Should Man City Worry? New Premier League Spending Rules

Should Manchester City worry about the new Premier League spending rules?
This is your latest Man City news and Man City transfer news.
The Premier League has voted to introduce new financial rules, with an anchoring cap being reportedly linked to the lowest earner in Premier League broadcasting revenue.
How will this affect the Premier League clubs, with each football club having their own agendas and spending power?
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @typicalcity9320
Facebook: / typicalcity9320
Twitter: / typicalcity9320
Instagram: / typicalcity9320
#mancity #manchestercity #premierleague #mcfc #championsleague #epl #football #footballnews #soccer #manchestercityfc

[@leon_sale]

If you haven't watched this lad, get subscribed (I've no affiliation by the way whatsoever) but he speaks sense and not on the 'click-bait' bandwagon.

[@renzelkhamacho1379]

The funny thing is, these rules they keep introducing will not hurt us, they'll hurt those that wish to be like us, clubs like: Villa, Newcastle etc. They are too late in trying to stop us, we're already dining with Kings and Queens and there's nothing they can do about it.

[@BikenutGB]

@@Wickedpissah41 Your knuckles must be really sore, keep dragging them along the floor

[@SemmeralddynamicsBaammy]

​@@Wickedpissah41 I guess you'll count down the clock forever. Go moan and cry somewhere else.

[@GalayethZen]

@@Wickedpissah41 lol, came to a City Pod just to troll City? Its very common for clubs to sponsor themselves. Look at Reynolds at Wrexham. Its done up and down the leagues. Dont like self sponsors - make a rule Dont like multi club - make a rule Dont like the fair market accounting that was signed off on by reputable auditors who work throughout the league - make a rule. It doesnt matter - you’re stuck with Noisy Neighbors until the Premiere league / England force the owners to sell like Abramavich for hypocritical political reasons.

[@GalayethZen]

Renz - the old guard have to make these rules to keep new clubs out. Theres only so many more rounds and tiers of international qualification that they can create. Soon theyll need to make 10 european slots to ensure those red shirted clubs can qualify 🤣

[@Wickedpissah41]

​​​yes you can sponsor yourselves but it has to be at market value not the 10X market value deals that you were doing with the etihad and Etisalat deals and then getting ADUG , your owner , to pay citeh the money that was supposedly coming from etihad and Etisalat, your club is corrupt as fuck and everyone knows it , your owner said he would rather spend £50m on lawyers and drag things out for years than pay a £10m fine , and he's been true to his word hasn't he , citeh fans know citeh are as dodgy as fuck why do you think citeh don't get any credit for the football they play or the trophies they win ...cos everyone else knows that you are dodgy and financially doped up to the eyeballs

[@AU_CITYYY]

My favourite city youtuber😎 #CTID

[@singingthebluestv]

i miss the days where we sat around a table and wrote our premiership XI .. these days i have to take my scientific calculator to the local pub and do hard maths! haha

[@singingthebluestv]

i should take my 'cap' to keep everyone on side

[@lewish_1476]

The premier league is pissing me off now. They keep changing rules. Even Newcastle can't spend. I miss old football. The football where you were allowed to spend what you wanted. Fck premier league now

[@blueshadow62]

Super league comin bck

[@GalayethZen]

@@chriscooper4205 what laundering? They are state owned teams. Countries dont need to launder money. And even for circumventing sanctions, the league/UK just forces a sale or blocks fund transfers. Abramavich did it to protect himself and his money from Putin. Nation states generally do it for investment diversification. Debatable about image washing being something that matters to them or is just a byproduct of their other goals.

[@GalayethZen]

@@chriscooper4205 idk the context of my other comments - i serious discuss things in some and troll back at trollers in others. For your thread here, i am truly interested in what laundering you are referring to or concerned by. This may have cone from my assumption that you meant an owner laundering their money with the club as a clean business. Which i am not aware of anyone being like that. The only thing i can think of is kind of the opposite. using the term laundering loosely in the sense of a club using the owners other business as the clean way to balance ffp. - i.e. city’s owner paying players and coaches for non-city related things back in their ruling country. Or the accusation of inflating purchases and sponsorships. Is that what you meant by laundering? I truely am asking and want to understand the context of the original comment.

[@GalayethZen]

@@chriscooper4205 I have a slightly different perception of what happened. I believe that they didnt exaggerate revenue. They actually received it. The dispute seems to be more the sponsors paid more than what fair value was. And they did this because they were either owned by or governed by the city owners. When it comes to hiding expenses. Thats where it seems to come into the manager doing a coaching session for UAE national team or whatever and then being paid for it again, accused of above market value. When it comes to their hired external auditors, i was under the impression that it was a big name firm who audits several premier league clubs. This essentially gave credence to the idea that they were too reputable and divested from City to give a slanted review. Lest they lose other accounts because of those teams feeling slighted. Now certainly audit firms could be colluding with their clients and willing to help hide items. But it also can be just that certain areas are vague and / or subjective. So an example of that - maybe City finds a Sir Alex consulting contract that is around that price and say yep that makes sense. And the prem see a mourinho consultation and say well this is a better estimate. The number of infractions the 100+ that folks throw around. It is yes that number. But i believe its 10 violations repeated yearly for 10 years. But if you dont realize that its a violation or you disagree and are waiting on a ruling. Its understandable that you could do your normal business practices that you think are ok for 10 years. Then are told actually thats wrong or just have grown to a point where its no longer seen as a stretch. Kind of like take a pen from work 10 times in year one. Do it 9 more years 10 times each. Then in year 11 you get on your performance review - stole 100 pens over 10 years. United having less growth than City is because they were already a global brand. They already had superstars and trophies and were the jerseys available at heathrow airport. Regarding stalling. Any big company will use their legal team to fight every detail in a case, especially when the stakes for the business are so high. Its a different story when someone says you broke a rule pay 20m. City’s owner says do you want that in gold, oil futures or cash. But when you say we are going to invalidate your trophies, your brand, Pep will leave you, all your stars will leave, you’ll be kicked out of either the prem or all the way down to the national league. Thats when they say ok let me introduce you to my 100 lawyers who are going to appeal from the big stuff all the way down to the ink you used to write us. And we’re going to counter sue you for defamation since weve had to listen to all this will players and coaches who werent even here at that time lift the trophy annually. Anyway, good stuff bud. I’m curious how it all works out. Good chatting with you, great points. Happy to keep in touch or even do a cross town podcast about it.

[@freddiehardicre8752]

The big question is 95% of clubs in the premier league including the red cartel are in debt up to there eye balls yet clubs who are debt free can't spend what they like, not only in the premier league, baca,Madrid, billions of pounds in debt but they can do what they want.

[@MCFC_BlueMoon_4_Times]

The noise is getting louder regarding city's FFP charges... It's sounding very good. 😉

[@handlerahdbwjsjs]

Stupid rules. They have nothing to do with the field

[@stevehall713]

Simon Jordan 😢 really wishes he could change all business rules so he could afford to run a football club again😂

[@k9services271]

Jordan is a knob. Hates City and doesn't try to hide it. Bell end.

[@christerskjellvik2169]

For a club like City this will not be such a big problem. City has the world's best academy. we only need to buy 1 or 2 players. our neighbor, on the other hand, has to buy 11 new players to even get to 4th place.

[@chrisbolton2500]

And good luck getting Madrid and Munich signing up to this nonsense 😅

[@Wickedpissah41]

Good job they aren't in premier league then ain't it 😂😂😂

[@anthonyharney2495]

Will this new ruling bring the breakaway super league a step closer?

[@chrisbolton2500]

@@Wickedpissah41 Indeed it is, a good point and well made. However, imagine what this, if applied, will do for our chances in European competitions. The likes of Madrid will spend us out of the game. Not all bad though. Our beloved neighbours United's planned fire sale and squad rebuild may take a hammering. Bet Sir Jim is raging.

[@Wickedpissah41]

​​@@chrisbolton2500European clubs like Madrid, barca ,juve are crying out for a European super league cos they cannt compete financially with the Premier league so how they goina outspend us ...they don't have the money, as for citeh as soon as them 115 charges come home to roost proberĺy just after pep has left citeh will be ringing clubs like real and barca and juve þoo kick-start European super league

[@chrisbolton2500]

@@Wickedpissah41 You could be right, you could be wrong, let's wait and see. Just seems the Premier League is determined to damage, if not destroy its own product partisanship notwithstanding. As for the rest, your guess is as good as mine.

[@CyperN077]

Why not move the goal post when the ball is in mid-flight? Why don't you? This is absolutely ridiculous. All this just to keep Manchester City at bay. whatever they do. I'm sure we'll find a way around it and twist it like it's a pretzel to suit our needs.

[@HaydenTaylor-qs1si]

Absolutely agree!! 💯

[@kippaxstreeter]

They'll change it again when the Star players stop coming and they're struggling to sell the product. Top video well explained. CTID

[@spark556]

The ones that should panic are everyone else 😈🔥

[@58JMG]

Great video as always mate. Regarding Brent de Goldbridge, he actually said in his video "we have to find a way to stop Man City" and there you have it .... Its a witch hunt always was. And just like the old rules, they will only harm the aspirational clubs.

[@nmb46]

Amazing Johnny, you put into words what I'm thinking but can't say...

[@sapeart24]

Great job done here ....

[@denis1996DV]

Something has to be done,but this is not a solution

[@gentwhoisoverit6992]

Very well broken down and explained Johnny!

[@man.q]

To be honest i would like to see Man city use more home grown players from their academy because we have somme brilliant youngsters

[@joshuabakutson239]

We can add more than the ones we have now and compete with the champions league big boys. We loan some and sell some is best we can do

[@miltonroy1449]

Very well explained !!!

[@kevinmillar1122]

Its about time great to see the sooner the PL gets back in its box the better for footballer

[@ademuaolumide2471]

Just let club spend what they earn simple. They complicat things too much

[@Hellothere-ok4pk]

Class as always mate 👍

[@davidmaskew]

The new rules seem to be almost like the PL asked the likes of Real Madrid and Bayern Munich what they would like them to do to give them a better chance against the English Teams in European Competition.

[@morts89]

The problem started in 92/93 United, Blackburn, Liverpool, Newcastle. Big spenders. No one complained then. It’s silly and fuck up when 20. Place in PL get more money price then 1st in serie A

[@petelawton7814]

Brilliant podcast love listening to your comments.You speak a lot of sense.CTID.

[@christerskjellvik2169]

The positive thing about this is that players can no longer be overpriced. Then no players are sold or bought.

[@andrewbrown1258]

Brilliant vlog mate!! Shines a light on the ludicrous and damaging nature of these rules from a big picture view!!

[@carlheald9228]

Another own goal by the premier league. They devalued their product when charging City with 115 charges.

[@Wickedpissah41]

Not really did the tour de France devalue their competition for banning lance Armstrong for cheating 🤔 🤔

[@david6532]

these are not rules, they are purely for discussion, yet the pfa will block this without doubt if it was to be introduced as they will not allow any wage caps at all.

[@achsdu17]

I get what the PL is trying to do, but I feel like this is really going to backfire on the Premier League and this could push players to go to other leagues to get a hefty payday. Salary caps work in the US... you really have 1 main league in sports with developmental leagues under. Not in Europe though... I don't see it lasting very long.

[@abetekandong1101]

Definitely, good players will move to other leagues and premier league will be less watched and less interesting

[@brentcockcroft4171]

Well done for putting your neck on the block and trying to explain and put your point a view across 👍

[@bluemooner1958]

Great content as usual.

[@abetekandong1101]

You’re wonderful and unbiased in your opinion and analysis. Kudos Man !

[@Renegade76892]

I'm still so confused😂 but I really dont like how close we are getting to the American style sport model in the prem...and I'm an American. One of the reasons I fell in love with football was how different it was from all our American sports and now we're getting closer and closer to that same model

[@rockyming1801]

Fantastic vid as always broke it down for the average fan

[@GalayethZen]

Thanks for clarifying. Not the pod i think you were eluding to, but another big one also only mentioned the cap.

[@KarlOmatsola]

Excellent work

[@jawheralhamedi859]

Good job mate

[@user-hg9mk3zj3l]

Again ...a top video . ..with great knowledge of what's happening in the weird world of football...cheers Jonny!

[@mauricesmith5871]

Cheers Jonny wtf are they doing 😂

[@johnsimmonds5876]

Easiest would be if all European Leagues and the PL had the same set of financial rules so the playing field was even!

[@typicalcity9320]

Stop talking sense John! 😉

[@stephenkent129]

Informative brother youv said exactly what iv been saying if i understand ya correctly,it’s surly gonna de value the premier league,where’s the logic,if anything surely this will help some teams then try to push for another European super league,they are seriously making themselves look even more incompetent 🤔good as always johny brother 👍👊

[@sunnydutta6194]

Any official article to read and understand by myself?

[@Hyster1aMcR]

I agree huge spending needs to be brought under control within football but things like aren't the way to do it and with how big clubs like us Madrid United Liverpool and so on its almost impossible to stop us its just going to hurt all the other teams as usual.

[@dnc9952]

Very good video, thanks for sharing your thoughts on it. The only bit I’m not sure you got right was on investing. I think the more you invest to bring in more revenue, like seats and stadium still adds value. if you can fill it with increasing capacity the more revenue you will have for the 70% of

[@macman622]

So what happens to all the excess money that is not allowed to be spent ? If city can’t spend say 200 million each year after 5 years = 1 billion that city can never spend ??

[@niyiodemakin6408]

Brilliant question, I think he should answer this

[@tomcrown9546]

Don’t forget the30m between the two caps is an annual pl charge so for example in the higher case w3 could buy a 150m pound player amortised over 5 years equals a 30m annual pl charge! Massive difference….

[@paulashwin247]

Watchers of the 'other individual' consider crayons a food group.

[@HALWASRIGHT]

Do you know who Jonny is calling out?

[@paulashwin247]

@@HALWASRIGHT Has to be the forest fan.

[@topazmcfc6405]

@@paulashwin247 Goldfish really grinds my gears.

[@paulashwin247]

@@topazmcfc6405 I honestly don't get why so many blues get off on sharing his rants. It's what he wants, yet some still can't see that it's all a money making scheme.

[@topazmcfc6405]

@paulashwin247 No, don't get us wrong, we all know it's a money-making scheme he's on about, but the fact that he does it to influence so many fans who can't think for themselves into thinking this nonsense and flooding social media, it starts to get really annoying.

[@raymondcochrane8617]

I really enjoy your take on things. Obviously they align with my own, but it's a view that city fans can agree with and I appreciate your general take on football. CTID

[@HaydenTaylor-qs1si]

Great video as usual mate, still struggling to get my head round it completely but this video has certainly helped! The premier league has been damaging it's own brand since they started bringing in these nonsense rules to thwart our rise to the top, (yet they failed in thay regard anyway) they haven't got a clue 😂 Loving the content my friend!! 💙👊

[@markgardner-oo6qp]

We've been shopping in the charity shops for the last 3 seasons anyway. What have we spent ?? What did everybody else spend in the last 3 years ? Whatttt?? Think hard people!! Our manager is the best in the world "fact" he's a genius so don't get anymore jealous than what you all are. By the way I hope Newcastle the best. They fully deserve it by far. Great fans and a great football club. I'm 53 so don't ever call me a glory hunter. Times change I'm afraid so don't be seething bcs we're going to win 4 press in succesion 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@mimicmickmickdoyle911]

Thanks Johnny mate for the explanation, much clearer now, they will try anything to stop City. May I ask why your so confident of the 115. Hope to God your right.

[@Wickedpissah41]

Cos he's deluded uefa already found you guilty

[@topazmcfc6405]

@@Wickedpissah41 You are the prime definition of a clown. The only thing uefa found us 'guilty' for was not co-operating with the investigation.

[@mimicmickmickdoyle911]

Doyle you are getting mixed up, it was United who were found guilty by UEFA and fined ,not a lot of people know that because it was hushed up in the Media , it was just a minor breach so that was ok.

[@stevedouvas1681]

Agree! The EPL is not the NFL! Totally different league structure! .

[@mauricebrian2258]

We are not guilty until proven otherwise i believe in our owners and the board and we will prove the hater's are wrong

[@allanambunya]

There's no stopping city, the train already left the station

[@andym5338]

Why dont ffp go after the cartel clubs that are up to their eyeballs indept, and yet stilll spending over their buget....

[@Louback33]

The devil will be in the details. Is this a salary cap? A total club expenditure cap? Do transfer fees factor in? Also, this should be seen as a further attempt by the PL to demonstrate they can regulate themselves. They fear the impending Independent Regulator. That context is important. Also it seems weird to have two sets of factors on a spending cap. Why not one or the other? I guess they're attempting to introduce a way that the little clubs won't send themselves out of business and the big clubs have some sort of limit on spending

[@KenTudor-sc1pt]

The Premier League needs to ask one question. What are we trying to achieve? The rules since loadsamoney came in have not added anything. The more things change the more they stay the same. Manchester Utd Arsenal and Liverpool ruled the roost and led the charge to stop Man City and before them Chelsea. So from a top three we have changed to a top three. Only the names have been changed, slightly. I feel sorry for super rich Newcastle who are not going forward much. Meanwhile Bury and Macc Town et Al are fucked, but who cares about the grass roots…….. not the PL that’s for sure.

[@AK-pw3oq]

They can try all they want that are not getting us in any way 😂

[@BdubbsVt]

This is a way to make the most popular clubs in prem history the most successful. The best players will go to the bigger clubs.

[@pushstart1t]

I don't think it's going to hurt football. It's just that clubs are going to have to stop demanding these ridiculous asking prices for the sell of their players... i mean if more clubs are going to be able to be in conversation with players and not be priced out I'm for that, but than again when the bidding wars starts than I guess bigger clubs will always have the advantage 😅.

[@anshumansahu1087]

The only solution to this problem is if FIFA come up with an universal set of rules that apply to all the football clubs in the world.

[@lwandilentaphane5719]

Toed Boely will find a loophole😂😂

[@jakeblues5854]

Salford dolphins 🐬 over a billion in debt dippers also heavily in debt but nothing mentioned, city debt free and well run

[@rashedalhamli3133]

Great input from you lad. Keep it going 🫡.

[@siralanmancini8048]

its a proposal

[@giventema4009]

Now u have to have a PhD to enjoy premier league matches

[@thelittlepikachu8241]

1 more reason to remove The Useless Ghost. His 800k salary+reward is too much.

[@MuddyDuck...]

As usual you make some great points Jonny 👍 But as you mention 'muddy waters', I feel suitably named to wade in with my 5 cents worth...🦆😂 . This is clearly yet another PL knee-jerk reaction to appease vested interests ('Red Cartel'). Which in its current proposed format appears to be very short-sighted and ill conceived. (sound familiar? 🤦🏻‍♀). Therefore in addition to your points, I would like to add the following: 1) The powers that be claimed that FFP / PSR rules were introduced to “improve the overall financial health of European club football”. 2) However the proposed new rules do NOTHING to improve on this. 3) Indeed it actually PUNISHES successful clubs like City that are the most financially healthy. 4) The arbitrary choice for a 'cap anchor' based on an apparent random multiple of the lowest PL TV revenue is TOTALLY NUTS ! 5) How can clubs build 5 or 10 year multi-billion pound business plans, including expensive infrastructure investment, based on what third party companies like Sky may (or may not) be able to afford downstream? Indeed companies that may be in financial difficulties themselves. 6) In the case of Sky, its parent organisation (Comcast) paid far too much for it. Now the US behemoth is weighed down by £74 billion of debt and has vast repayments to make, with Sky having become just an orphan in the rambling Comcast universe. So do we just hope that Sky survives? 7) By deliberately trying to cripple the more successful clubs, the PL opens itself up to legal challenge under the Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1976. 8) Indeed I can see some clubs including City ultimately taking class action against the PL, based on: a) **Compliance with Previous Rules**: Clubs might argue that implementing a new spending cap would disrupt their existing carefully laid-out financial strategies. b) **Investments Made in Good Faith**: The clubs could also argue that they have made long-term investments in players, infrastructure, and other areas in good faith, based on the rules and regulations in place at the time. Implementing a new spending cap could undermine the investments they've made and the stability of their financial planning. c) **Impacts Competitiveness**: Clubs like City can argue that the proposed spending cap unfairly restricts their ability to compete with other clubs in European football competitions (despite being fully compliant with current PSR rules). This will adversely impact their potential for earning significant revenue from European competitions. Will clubs even seek financial damages as a result of PL mismanagement ? d) **Legal Considerations**: Depending on the final terms (and formula) of the proposed spending cap, clubs could explore potential legal avenues to dispute its implementation. This might involve challenging the legality of the cap or arguing that it violates principles of fairness or competition law. [ Sorry - here endeth my rant... ]

[@muhammadnizam3397]

Jonny they are doing is now bcoz they doesn't want m.city win the EPL or any cup😂😂😂😂they jealous us bro😂😂😂

[@lwandilentaphane5719]

Thanks mate for this Video. These rules are a joke. Let's hope the cap is more than 4

[@terjeriis1156]

Of course Man City people think the money side of the game is boring. Yeah, they are probably the best team in PL, but they are certainly the most BORING side. More passes go sideways and backwards, taking the fun out of the game.

[@vaibhavnehe6388]

man united and liverpool also arsenal fans arent that educated to learn this maths and understand it, they focus too much into the delusion of their club and jealousy on ours. its going to be fun when city signs 100 mill 2players in same window and we dont even need to spend anymore. Premier league are basically with so many loopholes and if we maintain our top club status, we will keep making 500-700 million every season. we need to spend at most 200 mill in summer windows anyway to stay where we are but villa newcastle tottenham cant spend more than 150-200 mill.

[@petersmith5638]

Roll on the super league 🙏

[@LordMcQuack]

Will the companies that pay tons of money to broadcast the Premier League be happy about this?

[@andym5338]

The FA will destroy the PL, and English football . They will make unattractive to those footballers who were thinking of joining the Pl.....

[@bigm9465]

Premier league will capitulate on itself. It's all about control for the elite clubs. They don't want another Man City model knocking them off their perch. If they wanted a spending limit it should be fixed not percentages as percentages will never be fair for all. Let owners invest in clubs and cover any expenses that the club can't fund itself as they grow. Protects clubs from debt and allows for investment.

[@blueviper3861]

CITY rivals all butthurt and in bed together

[@felipec.santos4370]

Premier League needs to be rethink and reshaped, it's an absolute JOKE these days with this stupidity. The clubs need to go to the English Tribunals (even if it goes to the supreme court) and try to revert this crap, don't accept this!

[@Adam-ui4ef]

Of course Newcastle and City fans want unrestricted spending. You guys are owned by gulf states who enjoy the vanity projects of owning football teams. However you would become the very thing you claim to be against, that is the PL being a 'closed club', as City and Newcastle eventually turn the Premier League into a pissing contest between the UAE and Saudi Arabia. What's wrong with a more egalitarian approach that bridges the spending power in the league from the richest to the poorest? It would make the league more competitive for a start, which has always been the PL's biggest trait. Try and separate your self-interests as City fans and see it from a league perspective.

[@bambamxdrip1933]

Bam In The house! I have no spending rules

[@user-uc6ni6zv2u]

City being against it is enough reason to mean it's a good thing 😂

[@user-nr1dx4us4d]

Wow, you don't use your brain, am I shocked

[@GermanChickenwing]

City was against the old rule, so why are they charging it then? Please tell me..By your logic, the old rule was a good 1

[@siralanmancini8048]

Super league is coming

[@blueshadow62]

U r sooo heading 2 Super League Whether any f💔💔ker like it or not‼️🙄

[@toniorims8667]

You caused it now your crying

[@topazmcfc6405]

You do realize that Blackburn, Leeds, Newcastle and Chelsea also did the same thing, right? I swear you clowns just come on these platforms just to cry about our success

[@mikeoxsmells450]

This will keep happening when certainly polly pissy pants clubs cry sweet tears of bitterness GOD I love it