Landmark Judgement in Hindu Succession Act | Retroactively, Daughter has EQUAL Rights | Siddharth A.

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

The judgement was delivered by a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, Arun Mishra and MR Shah. Key Highlights 1. The Supreme Court ruled that the 2005 amendment would have retrospective effect in conferring rights on daughters who were alive at the time of the amendment, even if they were born prior to it. 2. The court also stated that daughters' right over the parental property will stand even if the father died prior to the coming into force of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. 3. Justice Mishra stated “DAUGHTER REMAINS A LOVING DAUGHTER THROUGHOUT LIFE” and they shall remain a coparcener throughout life irrespective of where the father is alive or not. The judgement was pronounced by Justice Arun Mishra, who while reading out the operative part of the judgment said that daughters have to be given an equal share of coparcenary rights in the share of property like the son.

[@gsingh5617]

Applicable on every hindu or those registered as huf under income tax?

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

I have already launched. Please visit my website siddharthagarwalclasses.com for details if you want to verify.

[@jiljilljigaa7547]

Limitations??

[@darth_vader4824]

How to get a judgement copy ?

[@svb7555]

What if the daughter uses this judgement in wrong way...!? It is applicable only on parental property ryt?

[@akash5703]

Pray they(girls) dont use this in any other bad way . Haq ki baat shi h pr aise toh expenses for father should also be shared by boys n girl equally .

[@pratikjaiswal5171]

But daughters doesn't take property of parents even if its a judgement passed by sc, judgements are one thing and practice are another. This wouldn't mean daughters would ask parents property as they already have husband's ancestral property . Further more this judgement too much vague as these days people live in apartment so what would u divide in a 2bhk or 3bhk apartment??...

[@she_with_words]

Yeah absolutely right... I wish they don't use this right in bad way like boys used to do...

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Dear Pratik. Please don't feel bad about this judgement. Suppose if you are a son, then your wife will have right in your property and her father's property. Practically, daughters relinquish their right in father's property in favour of their brothers, but in case, her husband dies or husband is poor, then she may prefer to claim her right in father's property. Also the law does not apply when father does not leave any inheritance.

[@pratikjaiswal5171]

@@SiddharthAgarwalClasses You're right Siddharth Sir , i didn't feel bad about it , its just that every law has it's own flaw . People find loopholes in everything and i thought of giving my perspective , and that is ,these days when rich gets richer and poor gets poorer , considering this law's application in kolkata , people live in single 2bhk or 3bhk houses ,my concern is how can Son and Daughter divide such small property which isn't further divisible. Who would have its final possession

[@mickeymouse4938]

Law is correct. Wrong is the society - parents paying dowry for daughters'marriage even though it is illegal, and parents expecting only son(and daughter in law) to take care of them financially and physically- but daughters going away after marriage.These things need to change.

[@neerusharma7862]

Thank you so much Sir for this wonderful information. And I am really proud of all the 3 judges for their fair judgment. 🙏😊

[@parasmahajan1617]

dis is very bad judgement 2005 se phle jinki partition ho gyi h..beto ka uss property pr lagav h..betio ka nhi..to kase easy ho jayega..vase b court kehta h 12 sal jiska kabza uski property..15 sal to ho gye amendmend ko bne hue..

[@Rayling699]

This is not a right to equality , unmarried girl should be equal share holder of parents property , but once she is married she should only be share holder of her husband property , This judgement only encourage more dispute cases , already over incapable of resolving cases in 10years of times . Reformed in property and land Rights law is must in indian system to avoid failing unnecessary cases

[@mamathareddy8211]

Actually this made me broke..bcs my grandfather not thr his acentral property Shd come to my dad he is not mentally n physically well he has 4 sisters who were well settled ..thy r fighting from lng bck, my mom is suffering wth husband n this people . Finally it came to end this time but at this time this act came ltrally not every1 situation r same . Im also a grl..but situation were difer from 1 to othr ..this shd b include little changes.

[@venkateshtata3935]

Thank you for sharing with us sir, hope you come with more such updates for gaining knowledge.

[@kundanjha3436]

Dear sir... Pls clear my doubt.. Daughter remain daughter... Son is son untill marriage... Is both statements equal in ur parameters.. How they judges can do equality through an un equal statement... Pls pls reply sir... Clear my doubt..

[@tylerdurden5642]

Yes bruh ur right...don't know y they are targeting guys....

[@krishnasinghrajput5425]

Sir UP Mai married daughter ko adikar nhi diya ja raha. Kya kre sir please reply me

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Dear All, The Hindu Succession Act applies if a person dies without a WILL (legally it is called death intestate). Practically, most middle class or poor families don’t have enough property to write a WILL. So, this problem of inheritance does not arise. As far as wealthy families are considered, they all have a written legal FAMILY Constitution document or WILL to avoid any inheritance related disputes. Where there is a WILL, the above Hindu Succession Act does not apply. Also many comments have a negative sentiment towards Daughters or their Husbands. Remember that SONS or their wives too may have malicious intentions. In today’s nuclear family concepts, Hindu Succession Act does not work; this Statute mostly works in case of HUFs.

[@CMAchiever]

Awesome.. Sir.... Your teaching is... Very... Very nice.. And easily understand 😊

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Dear All, Many comments have a negative sentiment towards Daughters or their Husbands. Remember that SONS or their wives too may have malicious intentions. In today’s nuclear family concepts, Hindu Succession Act does not work; this Statute mostly works in case of HUFs.

[@she_with_words]

Great decision sir... 🙌🙌and nicely you explained it... 🙏

[@amitshukla9194]

Sir you're doing very good work love your skill of simplifying the study, cases+ law...

[@manjunathaks607]

My father sister died in 1966 , will her children's now have rights to get their share in my grandfather and forefather properties who also died in 1984... please give me your valuable advice sir. All properties are devided by 2 son's by oral partision at 1984 and mutations RTC,khata are running in their names from 1984..

[@EeshuNeeshu]

Nice one sir.... Good decision... 😍N your teaching.... We students are your fan sir.. U explain everything so well..

[@sahiljain6061]

If its ancectal property that is farming land not the father's earned property ,and if the property is willed between 2 sons...can the daughter still get an equal share???

[@shabisingg9831]

Sir ji hindu succession act Jammu and Kashmir ma lagu hua ha ja nai 11aug 2005 daughter equal rights jk ma lagu hua ha ja nai plz btaoo sir ji

[@pavan1854]

1956 before birth be rights or not please tel me

[@arifsayyed2410]

Will this apply in Uttar Pradesh for agriculture land as well because till date in Uttar Pradesh married daughters were not allowed to inherit fathers property despite Supreme Court 2005 judgement. In Uttar Pradesh they follow Zamindari Act. Can anyone enlighten whether in Uttar Pradesh today's 11th August 2020 judgement will be implemented or still will continue with Zamindari Act. Uttar Pradesh daughter's should come forward if still UP does not honour the judgement of SC

[@arifsayyed2410]

@Akansha Shrivastava I hope after latest Ammendment Supreme court should make sure that in Uttar Pradesh married daughters too get their rights in agriculture land. Also, you are absolutely right that maximum lawyers are not aware about it. I suggest to you approach supreme Court directly and I am sure SC will help you out and you can get your property. In YOU TUBE also no one talks about Uttar Pradesh. Media houses should help and married daughters of UP should come forward and fight for their right.

[@Yashwanth.S23]

Hello sir. I have a question. If women died in 1985 will there childrens have right to ask ancestors property if property division not happened till now.

[@chandnisramnani8069]

Sir You Always comes with some knowledgeable facts...!👌

[@vikrantpatil4519]

Hello sir plzz reply my mother is in trouble. Her brother have taken all the property and her father is dead in 80s but now her bother is not giving her .Looking at paper's my mother have legally named on that property,but my mother is in tention that if we case on him ,he will take the case for years and we don't have that much to fight further.. Do reply

[@gopiedharada8342]

Daughter's equal rights in property is good decision by Supreme Court I to accept it but there should be one condition that the daughter who makes love marriage without knowing to the parents or without permission( acceptance ) of parents ,she should be uneligible for(daughters equal rights in property) she should have no rights in property.few people trap girls by seeing their property

[@_farhin_khan1542]

Consent of parents are not needed if the girl is above 18.

[@priyanksingh3468]

Sir ek baat batae govt new rule lai acha hai 2020 se apply kree na yeh piche se kyu kisi bete pr whi property se ghr chlta ho pichle 15 saal se ek dum sewoh chize ke 3 hisse ho jae yeh galat hai aaj se apply krna chaiye jo phle ke case hai unhe solve ke lia sabko kyu lapet lia ab 60 saal ki bhen bi sasural se hakk mange aa jae yeh toh galat hai married n unmarried bi ni btaya yeh toh uss bhai ki aane wli beetiyo ke sth galat ho bhen roop beti ko achank fayda jo 60 saal ki hai jinka kal future hai un baccho ka hakk chinna ja rha

[@sauravkant1933]

sir if i am not wrong , "aab hamare bua ke ladke hamare ghar me aake humse adhi prpoerty ka demand karenge jinki sadi 35 years pahale ho gai thi " kyuki hamne apni jamin and property aaj tak bacha ke rakha hai aane wale generations ke liye .., in short aab humare property ka distribution koi nhi rok sakta chahe hum ghas(grass) kha ke use bachana chahe aane wale generations ke liye

[@diwakartiwari6496]

Ye kanoon 2005 ke baad waale mamlo me lagoo hota hai. Mujhe to dar is baat ka hai ki ab zameen lene buaa ke ladke bhi aawenge aur jeeja bhi🤔

[@Anithashivappa876]

Rights on grandfather property? Plz help

[@watchsubham5196]

Please help! 💡 What if the parental property already transferred to son's name in back date around 2012-13 . Can the daughter claim now? My prop. Has been taken forcefully by my brother. I hav 0 , will I get?

[@harshas8161]

Yes

[@jeetendrapathak7329]

🙏🙏Please send judgement copy in pdf🙏🙏

[@NiyatiAtal]

What abt liability of parents ... is daughter cmg to share that ... is she ready to take care of the parents in old age ... daughter shld not come only to share property but also responsibilities towards parents 🙏🏼🙏🏼

[@Riteshkumar-fj2nm]

What if the father died before hindu succession act 1956 ?

[@kishorekrish8399]

Hi sir...can we take legal action on already registered property...the above said property was registered in 2015 stating that women have no rights on ancestry property and the deed was released

[@kkamalslu]

sir. my father in low ki death 19april2020 ko ho gyi ha . but my father in low ne 3-4 saal phale vasiyat banava di thi ki jb tk main jinda hu tab tk meri proprty meri ha mere marne ke baad mere bate (putr) ki ha. ese case me kya hoga . ye proprty mere father in low ko apne father se virasat me mili ha. my brother in low ki 22 saal phale marrage hui thi us ke baad aaj tk wo merei wife se baat na ki ha na hi in 22 saalo me mere father in low se baat ki us ne . plzz guide me

[@jeetendrapathak7329]

🙏🙏Sir judgement ka pdf send kare please 🙏🙏

[@jeetendrapathak7329]

🙏🙏Sir please give me judgement pdf🙏🙏

[@sarveshreddy468]

Only advocate will live happy by this type of judgement . From now every home will have a case of partition .

[@Abc-fj6zy]

Kyu.. Bhai bhn ka haq agr barabar ho gya.. Toh bhai ko hajam kyu nhi hoga.. Kya vo apni bhn se pyaar nhi krta? Yh baate mt karo.. Koi nyi cheez nhi h yeh equal property rights toh 2005 m hi mil gye the.. 15 saal ho gye

[@subrataghosh7639]

@@Abc-fj6zy behen aapki saadi 1980 mai ho gyi hai...aap apne pita k marne pe v nei ayi aur aap abhi property mai hissa lene k liye aa gyi katora leke..wah!

[@subhasishnaskar6638]

Even if the father is alive, is there more to the ancestral property?

[@veerannaparma8797]

Sir, In view of supreme court's new decision, I have an agriculture land of four acres. The partition ( Mutation registry) was done in my and my brother’s favor equally during 1986 june with help of village accountant and tahasildar.Since from 1987 I am getting holdings certificate, Phani nakkal.But partition has not done through deed registration nor court decree . My father died during 1998. Before june 1986 the agriculture land was on father’s name.before 1963 it was on the name of my grand fathe who divided the agri land in between my father and and my fathr’s elder brother equally. I have four married sisters who were married before 2004 june, asking share in the above land. If father died before 2005 sep 9, can they claim if it is ancestral property . Kindly answer. With regards Veeranna parmar. Sir, I want to download this judment , Kindly send the url . for preparing mutation registry, in karnataka talathi, girdavar and tahasildar prepares documents like notification, receiving application from (father ) owner of property etc are coming under public documents or private documents sir?

[@darth_vader4824]

What if the property is sold prior to 2005? Can they claim the ownership of land even though it is in third party hand and the sale happened before the judgement? Also, what happens in case of will?

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Dear All, The Hindu Succession Act applies if a person dies without a WILL (legally it is called death intestate). Practically, most middle class or poor families don’t have enough property to write a WILL. So, this problem of inheritance does not arise. As far as wealthy families are considered, they all have a written legal FAMILY Constitution document or WILL to avoid any inheritance related disputes. Where there is a WILL, the above Hindu Succession Act does not apply. Also many comments have a negative sentiment towards Daughters or their Husbands. Remember that SONS or their wives too may have malicious intentions. In today’s nuclear family concepts, Hindu Succession Act does not work; this Statute mostly works in case of HUFs.

[@sharathk2135]

Sir if daughter was born before 1950(before Hindu succession act 1956 came into force) will they get equal right in ancestors property???

[@hypercubergumi]

I also need an answer to Ur query

[@shradhapatra7193]

Sir , if father has given his ancestral property to his one son in will ..then can the daughters object it

[@shradhapatra7193]

Sir reply ???

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

NO. Pls read my initial comments on video for clarity.

[@vivekparmar6705]

Sir, if property in ownership of grandfather and at present no partition of ownership and marriaged daughter's widow daughter-in-law want file claim in property of her mother-in-law's father property,such claim is valid, if her mother-in-law is pass out??

[@vivekparmar6705]

Sir , answer??????

[@jhingurop9333]

2005 के पूर्व जिनके पिता की मृत्यु हो चुकी है उनको लाभ मिलेगा लेकिन मृत्यु किस सन तक होनी चाहिए,,नही तो लिमिटेशन एक्ट भी अप्लाई करेगा,,जजो का यह निर्णय क्लियर नही है

[@VLOGWITHSANDESH]

2 बहन मिलकर एक भाई को चुपके से अपना हिस्सा को लिख दी है वो रहने वाला घर है तो एक भाई रहने के लिए कहाँ जायेगा

[@sonamgujar4341]

घर के बाहर यही तो हकीकत हे भाई

[@p7235]

Sir mere pitaji ke sath aisa ho raha hai abhi Kuch samajh mein nahin aata hai kya karun

[@byomakeshmuduli1643]

Thank you sir....

[@sarveshreddy468]

This judgement will go to 5th branch ?

[@sumansiva1405]

Is there any rules to share the dept with daughter which borrowed in grand-father time ?

[@firdoushussain8655]

Sir yours update are very helpful

[@Tushar-ym5yo]

Why you don't launch Google drive/pendrive class plz give reason n sir plzz reply....

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

I have already launched. Please visit my website siddharthagarwalclasses.com for details if you want to verify.

[@Tushar-ym5yo]

@@SiddharthAgarwalClasses ok Thanks for replying sir I don't know about it that u already launched classes 😊😊....

[@nainsimachhi5560]

Sir Agar 2019 me case filed huva hai 2005 k basis par toh ab uska dessision kis basis par hoga 2005 act ya 2020 act..plz reply sir

[@sarveshreddy468]

Sir my grandfather have 3 daughter s and 1son .3rd & 2rd daughters died in 1971 & 1983 .the 3&2nd daughter children's file a case against the living son claiming her mother share .they will get any rights ? In this judgement .my grandfather died in the year 2003, so plz clear the confuse

[@utkarshpandey6137]

Sir kya isme krishi bhoomi bhi include hogi kya?

[@khushalking]

This is really very genuine information. I have a query in case daughter is expired and his husband can claim her property rights.

[@rohitarote4153]

Agr jaijat ma ke nam ki hoti hai to kya beti ka hakk hota hai ya nahi......? Plz rply me sir.

[@abhijeetsingh5310]

Bahut bdya judgement hai😘😘

[@Shank1qq]

Why there is appreciation about this worst judgement. Because of this judgement even old women's aged 80 years put case against their brothers and this judgement leads to decline of family relations . 2005 ammendment was misinterpreted by supreme court. From the commencement of this act if a father died his interest can be devolved to son and daughter... It is not retrospective

[@anuragkrishna798]

Jai shree Krishna sir ji🙏

[@vasanthk6kenganvar747]

Sir my mom born on 1953 will she get benifit from this act

[@hypercubergumi]

Really dont think so.. as it's from the codification of act which is 1956

[@milindmayekar152]

Sir does it have Retroactive effect means it applies to daughter alive on 9 Sep 2005?

[@sonamchouhan3957]

sir property jiwan yapen k liye de ho toh

[@anoopkumar-yt5zy]

one thing , is this apply on agriculture property also or only city property ??

[@risvanth1874]

From which year this act passed

[@tylerdurden5642]

Sir this is honestly unfair🥀😫 don't know y they are targeting guys... They should have made this prospective not retrospective....even in marriage if a guy gets divorced has to pay for all her experience... This is the reason I don't want to get married at all....

[@rahulverma3976]

If parents get ill, will their medical bills and other expenses be divided between sons and daughters?

[@urjitajain8507]

It will be deducted from the property , and don’t crib about it or take it personally , chill

[@remisingh5100]

Sir is it applicable for agriculture land in uttarpradesh for married daughters also?

[@remisingh5100]

Sir plz reply

[@prakashmishra156]

प्रणाम सर.. कृपया एक प्रश्न का उत्तर दें आप। यदि पिता की दो सन्तानों मे एक बेटा हो और एक बेटी तथा पिता वर्ष 1995 में हीं बेटे की बुरी आदतों के चलते पैतृक सम्पत्ति (जमीन) बेटे की पत्नी के नाम वसीयत करके वर्ष 2016 में मर गया हो। तो क्या सुप्रीम कोर्ट के अगस्त 2020 के फैसले के आधार पर बेटी पैतृक सम्पत्ति के लिए दावा करके उसे प्राप्त कर सकती है ? आपसे हाथ जोड़कर निवेदन है कि कृपया इस बिन्दु पर ध्यान देते हुए जवाब जरूर दें मान्यवर। 🙏

[@atyagi05]

jitni jaankari mujhe hai us hisab se jo property will ke dwara kisi ko di jaati hai uspar aur kisi ka koi haq nahi hota hai. jabtak ki yahi prove na kar diya jaaye ki will galat tareeke se banai gayi.

[@siddeswaramv6114]

This Is not landmark judgement ,this is a judgement to increase the cases in court and keeping fights in families.supreme court it self informed in 2018 the father must alive till 2005 to get equal share keeping this in mind we have done many transactions so supremd court need to give clarity on this.second fathers loans and liabilities who need to pay only by son this also need to clarify from suprem court.

[@anuragojha394]

Sir ,clear please,if father makes a testamony will to the name of his sons by will Still daughters can claim by the law ?

[@urjitajain8507]

Yes please reply

[@sandeepkapoor6530]

Does this judgement apply for Muslims and others religion? If not is our Constitutions laws equal for all religion? Why in schools teachers taught that we all have equal rights in all religion? Please explain 🙏

[@krishnaraizada8385]

Sir ek jaankari chahiye aapse, aggar koi beti 1991 me born hui hai aur 1992 me uske father khatam ho gaye. Isme yeh jaanna hai aapse ki yadi unki mother ne saari property bech di ho, to kya unki beti case file kar sakti hai ya nahi.

[@sriranganaidu6222]

Equal right on ancient property was introduced by NTR in 1985 in Andhra Pradesh later many states followed the same then central government made central law

[@vaishalij7590]

If father and daughter both died before 2005 will this act applicable?

[@gurusuhasana5824]

@@vaishalij7590 yes ....if your mother and her father died still you can get property....but property shouldnot be devided

[@saurabhsingh6362]

Does married daughter have right over property in real father property or have right in husband’s property or in both sides?

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Yes. Suppose if you are a son, then your wife will have right in your property and her father's property. Practically, daughters relinquish their right in father's property in favour of their brothers, but in case, her husband dies or husband is poor, then she may prefer to claim her right in father's property.

[@saurabhsingh6362]

Siddharth Agarwal Classes thanks you sir

[@akashsindhu1929]

Siddharth Agarwal Classes sir if her husband is a thug then also rule applies (other two options of husbands death and poverty)

[@nic09101982]

would have been happy if the SC had some powers of daughter in laws in marital property...

[@supriyachawan5348]

Sir wt if property is transferred to sons before 2005?still we can claim or not

[@siddeswaramv6114]

no if property transfered before 20.12.2004 you cant claim for this public documents is required.

[@p7235]

Sir meri pitaji ki jamin pitaji ki pitaji ki pitaji ki hai to sir meri pitaji ki jamin mai apni 2 behan apni nam krabake bhu Mafiya ko bikrdi Kar Diya abi ar ak brhan nam lgbane ke koshish Kar rahi hai .. sir avhi ham 26 sal Kai hai or hamre Pas itna jamin bhi nhi hai in dono behen milkr Jami ko bhu mafiye bikrdi krte hai or .inka bibha vhi 1985 1995 ke sabka vibah ho geya . Sir jab ye sab behen vibah nhi huwe the tab q inko jamin nhi sahiye the avhi 2000 me ye behan Jake apna nam karbake ak ak jamin Ka hak leke bikrdi kr rahe he 2000-2008 tak krib krib in dono behen ne 3 bigha jamin bokrdi Kar Diya ..or jamin unko unki pitaji ne Apne nam nhi karbaya tha unki pitaji 1979 me hi mar geya tha .usi time in behn ko jamin nhi sahiye tha lekin abhi unko sadi ho Jane ke bad jamin sahiye . Ar ha agr kal ham sadi karenge to hamiri batcha Kaha rahega kha pe bo apni Ghar banbayega ham abhi 2 vhai he ..2005 se abhi tak pitaji ne court me case hi Kar rahe he abi tak Kuch nhi huwa tha or avi to umid he soro ... Abhi hamri future ko dekhete huwe asi larki ko sadi Karna parega Jo Apne sath rahene ke liye jamin la sake nhi to hamiri future rahigi kaha pe ...usko dahej ki Tarah mat dekhna hoga .....qki Ase Karna hoga ...age Jake hame vhi...khud jamin dusroko do or dusorki jamin apna lo ..or behen rahegi dono tarf se moj me. Vhai ki jamin bikdi kro pesa lo husband ki vhi jamin bkrdi karke pesa lo or enjoy kro life ko ..... Ase meri pitaji ki behan Kar rahi thi avi or achan ho geya he usko jamin Lene ke liye abhi hamko dekhete rehena he Jo Thora sa tha o vhi abi bhag kre do jne ko ...ar ham dono vi ko avhi Achi Karna parega ye batcha mat peda karo ye fir apni wife ko vhi sath me jamin lane ko bolna prega.. tvhi future age barhegi rehenki .. me manta hu jamin behan ko vhi dena sahiye tab jab unki sadi nhi huwa ya fir unki husband me inko sor Diya Ase behan ko milna sahiye ... Jis behen ke Pas sab Kuch he tab vi usko denna pre to ham Bhai log kha pe Jaye .

[@GRishabhMishra]

Sir what about the daughters who died ...... Does her children has equal rights on their maternal property ..?

[@dr.msangeetasharma8037]

Thenk u sir plz help me. Mai brahmin hu maine inter cast sc marrige ki h .mere parents mujhse rishta nahi rakhte h na gher bulate h mere bhai or bhabhi bhi dhmki dete h ki mera ab us gher se koi lena dena nai h . Mere papavki parental propetty bhut kam h .sari property mummy papa ki job se hi bsni h .mimmy ne sari property apne nam kerwa rakhi h.apne dono beto pe luta rahi h or ve bewkoof bana rshe h . Sab kich in logo ne barbad ker diya .mimmy papa puri tarah se unhi k fevrr mai h .meri to shekl bhi nahi fekhna chahte h .saat sal ho gaye sir lekin ab mujhe bhi us self earned property me se hissa chahiye .mai kya karoo koi bhi mera soporter nai h .bhai bolte h ki tujhe to ma bap ne bedakhel ker diya h tu hamare gher mat aaya ker

[@ramamallireddy482]

What about rights of women born before 1956

[@msrk1015]

If a father purchased a property in the name of his son. Whether daughter have right to share the property? Eventhough it's in the name of son. What about HUF property? But property is in the name of sons only?

[@Summarizetube]

Sir, I thank you for your time and review on this latest judgement I have confusion here. My father died in year 2003 leaving a will in name of my mother. I have one brother and 3 sisters. Though father will was not probated. And in records it's still in my father's name. My father got the property in rehabilitation under his will he claim it to be self acquired property. Now, my mother died in year 2016. And non of legal heir have filed suit till date to claim there shares in property left by father. As far as latest judgement is conserned will my 3 sisters have right in this property now? Can they claim there shares? Please clarify? Thanks in advance

[@Summarizetube]

Sir your reply?

[@JaisriRAM007-a2z]

Can I get a copy of the judgement

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

drive.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/pdf_upload-379766.pdf

[@pragyasingh4020]

Thank you The hindu to Upar se ja raha tha

[@prithwirajdey1187]

what if the father has given the property to son willingly after 2005 ?

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

If father has made WILL, then this does not apply.

[@sunilt8411]

Sir Plzz reply me.. Is it applicable today onwards? Or after got partition also?

[@narendra1995]

Sir If the daughter has died on 1998 then the law will apply or not, Sir please give Answer If it requires paying a fee for the same.

[@pawankumar-pd8xf]

If the daughter has died before 09.09.2005 ..then nobody can claim right on behalf of her. so no problem.

[@shovitsingh5938]

Dear respected Sir, I am sharing my query with you after having failed to get the unqualified response from other sources. Hopeful that my query would be answered with your best efforts for which i owe you a debt of gratitude. Whether grandson acquire any right in the property inherited by his father by way of succession after grandfather’s death. Actually, property in dispute is the self-acquired property of Grand-father. Please explain and may share Supreme court ruling in support of it. (Assumption - Grandfather wife is dead and has only one son, daughter in law and grandson) OR Can grand son stake claim to his Grandfather’s self-acquired property which is after grand father’s death devolved upon his father by way of succession. Please explain and may share Supreme court ruling in support of it. (Assumption - Grandfather wife is dead and has only one son, daughter in law and grandson) Family Tree Grandfather (100% self-Acquired Property) | Son ---- Son wife | Grand Son Note: Grand Father died intestate leaving behind self-acquired property which devolved upon his son by way of succession. Regards,

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Dear Shovit, I am not an expert on Succession laws. Every case study such as yours requires a lot of research and analysis of preceding case laws. Unfortunately, the topic falls beyond my area of expertise. I suggest that you consult a top law firm. They will charge you a lot but it is better than to go to numerous lawyers. It happened with me in my own legal case. So out of experience, I am suggesting you.

[@pawankumar-pd8xf]

Yes, the grandson can claim his right in the property and he will get an equal part to his father.

[@prasannasawant1212]

hello sir...aapse ek question hai...kya is judgement pr chief justice ke pass firse appeal ho skta hai kya ???

[@prasannasawant1212]

plss reply sir...this order appealable or non appealable

[@xyzabc1427]

Sir kya is amendment yeh bhi point h ki gar 4 bhai aur 1 bhen h to bhaiyo ko 50% me se milega or bhen ko 50% pura milega???

[@xyzabc1427]

Thanks your heart but as you read my comment please reply

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Please read my initial comments on this video. It covers many common doubts.

[@sruthilaya8257]

Hi Sir Do daughters born before 1956 have equal rights too?

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

NO. Not before 1956

[@sruthilaya8257]

@@SiddharthAgarwalClasses Why not sir? SC has never mentioned this in the judgement

[@vipulsinghal518]

Sir in case father has already written his deed in favour of son..then whether daughter can also claim her right in the property

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Then, No. Pls read my first comments.

[@vipulsinghal518]

Okay sir thanks

[@gurusuhasana5824]

@@SiddharthAgarwalClasses my mother was born on 1970.....and the ancestral property is in my grandmother's name....do we have rights on it....

[@PradeepSharma-fm8jj]

This judgement basically pertains to the provisions of Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 which deals with right on ancestral property. Self acquired property of father is dealt in section 8 of the Act.

[@ashokmenghani]

Daughters are still treated the other house people.

[@hoysala.s.7704]

It should've made clear while getting her married by her family to treat their daughters as their own.

[@hoysala.s.7704]

It should've made clear while getting her married by her family to treat their daughters as their own.

[@gohilacc]

What about responsibility??????

[@ab-ve4zt]

Sir if ancestral agriculture property is divided in 1980 b/w two brothers in sdm court after father death without will but married daughter not got share at that time will she is eligible know to get property. Hindi family

[@shaleenmalhotra781]

If father doesn't wants to give then what?

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

Dear All, The Hindu Succession Act applies if a person dies without a WILL (legally it is called death intestate). Practically, most middle class or poor families don’t have enough property to write a WILL. So, this problem of inheritance does not arise. As far as wealthy families are considered, they all have a written legal FAMILY Constitution document or WILL to avoid any inheritance related disputes. Where there is a WILL, the above Hindu Succession Act does not apply. Also many comments have a negative sentiment towards Daughters or their Husbands. Remember that SONS or their wives too may have malicious intentions. In today’s nuclear family concepts, Hindu Succession Act does not work; this Statute mostly works in case of HUFs.

[@nehapathak9875]

Sir agar kisi ke cousin brother ne forcefully will bana liya hoga daughter ki knowledge ke bina to is case me kya hoga?

[@sandeepkapoor6530]

The side effects which we are seeing that parents don't want to give birth to girl child and boys girls ratio will get bad effect.

[@innocenttrader1280]

@siddharth one clarification, this judgement will be applicable only for joint undivided family? My mother has signed relinquishment deed due to mental pressure given by their brothers, now do we still have the right on the property pls clarify thanks 😊

[@innocenttrader1280]

Bro pls suggest me

[@innocenttrader1280]

Waiting

[@innocenttrader1280]

For ur reply

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

If you can prove it that YOUR MOTHER signed under undue influence and the terms of the deed itself are unconscionable, then it mauy be quashed. You need to hire a lawyer because your case is more about Question of FACTS (proof based).

[@innocenttrader1280]

@@SiddharthAgarwalClasses thanks for the reply sir

[@vijay1putcha]

Should the daughter be alive on 9/9/2005?

[@hoysala.s.7704]

If daughter is also equal then let them also do all the deceased rituals just like sons. Like including, shaving their hairs. It's just bullshit, Supreme Court should've made it from and after who are born on 2005 . This may lead to fights between brothers and sisters. Such a shameful verdict. Let see where this world finally end up. And by the way , my father in law is a from a poor background, all they have is only one acre of land, which is given for my brother in law, he is uneducated and only source of income and few small business, now should I run to my wife and ask her to file a complaint against her family. You judges are worthless and hopeless. There is no faith in Supreme Court anymore.

[@jaihind7621]

To fir betiyo ko apne mata pita ko sambhalne me bhi equal rights hona chahiye....

[@untold_miles]

It will applicable to muslim?

[@SiddharthAgarwalClasses]

NO.

[@harshas8161]

Excellent dear judges, God bless you.

[@durgaparmeshwari6490]

This is reference case....not enforced act....let's watch nd wait....fr further loop holes to discussed....

[@arshaulakh4230]

Agar 2004 se pehle he petrik sampatti Ka batwara ho geya ho toh kya bateyuo Ka hakh bnta hai