Shekhar Prit Jha Mr., Advocate Topic: Hindu Succession ACT - 1956 & Amendment Thereto in 2005

[@sanjeevsirohi8056]

I am so impressed with the way senior advocate Mr Shekhar Sir speaks! I would urge him to spare some time and also speak on why Uttar Pradesh which is the state with maximum population, maximum number of pending cases, maximum number of Judges in all Courts, maximum number of constituencies, maximum number of MPs, maximum number of MLAs and what not and still has just one Bench and that too so near to Allahabad at Lucknow only and nowhere else? Why state like the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud that is Maharashtra has maximum number of Benches and why lawless Bihar which is the home state of incumbent Chairman of Supreme Court Bar Association of India Mr Vikas Singh has not even a single HC Bench and which is slammed by senior Union Cabinet Minister like Giriraj Singh as lawless State where Jungle Raj prevails has not even a single HC Bench? Similarly why West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases of UP has not even a single HC Bench and this despite the irrefutable fact that Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge recommended three HC Benches and why Maharashtra which is the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud has maximum number of Benches and why it was given one more at Aurangabad in 1985 while depriving UP of even a single HC Bench? Why when lawyers of West UP went on strike for 5 and half months in 2014-15 when the incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud was Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court and yet we saw no initiative forthcoming from him even though he speaks so brilliantly on many things pertaining to UP even after becoming CJI? Why the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud we saw the former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray approved one more Bench at Kolhapur for just six district only but for 30 districts of West UP with population of more than 10 crores and still not one Bench created? Why Centre happily approved two Benches for Karnataka in one go at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively for just four and eight districts only and population of Karnataka is just 6 crore? Why the incumbent PM Narendra Damodardas Modi who represents Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh approved statehood for Telangana with just about 3 crore population but for more than ten crores people of West UP not a single HC Bench is being approved? Why the 230th report of the Law Commission of India recommended creation of more High Court Benches in States and why even after 14 years it is still gathering dust? Please organise lecture on this also! It is my humble request! My very best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate

[@Pokethuder]

Jha sir very cogently explained the difficult act very eloquently &; erudite ly.

[@bindalaanandraj5233]

Excellent informations from you thank you very much sir jaishriram jaihanuman

[@scientificspiritualityBHARAT]

Pls sign this petition to save Indian family values. Unmarried daughter naturally have their undivided right and as per tradition, earning brother has to care for his unmarried sister after the demise of their father or both parents. Even Married sisters are looked after in all aspects by Brothers if his sister becomes a Widow, or is a Divorcee and has no assets of her deceased or divorced husband. Today almost every urban married woman is working and earning too. Such married women generally do not contribute to the financially weak brother in any manner as this is not acceptable by the society and the brother has to fend for himself. All Hindu personal laws can be made only as per the set tradition and norms of age old customs which have been followed to protect sanctity of relationship between family members. Can any law enacted be anti family,? is the question. Also in India even today, many Hindu fathers do not feel the need to make their last Will and testament on the firm belief that their married daughters will not claim suddenly after their demise from their son, who is left with no choice but to give half share as per law. Point is... In this process the relationship between such a married sister and brother ends on a very bad note. They stop talking with each other for life due to the evil design of a mindless and biased law. There is no respect left after such brother suddenly has to sell his ancestral home which provided shelter to sisters in times of distress for several generations. He is forced by law to sell and alienate his house of ancestors as his well established married sister now has law in her side to demand a partition. Therefore this petition to call for abolition of the unmindful Amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, 2005 which has now caused big rift in the Hindu Families of India www.change.org/p/government-of-india-stop-double-benefit-to-married-daughter-in-estate-of-deceased-father?recruiter=false&recruited_by_id=2c72eae0-b81a-11e9-8015-1da649b8981c This decision by the Apex Court will certainly break the pious relationship between a brother and sister. Married sisters will be double beneficiaries of both husbands property and fathers property. Relations will get spoiled as the brother will have to sell his ancestral home and give half from established family business. Daughters Have Coparcenery Rights Even If Their Father Was Not Alive When Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 Came Into Force: SC www.livelaw.in/top-stories/hindu-succession-amendment-2005-has-retrospective-effect-161260?infinitescroll=1#.XzJGgDJxRdA. Dear readers, because of this decision in the coming years Hindus will consider their cousins and aunts as enemies. From the very childhood the male heir will be now the loser, in heirship and this will dissuade him to do anything constructive for his family or family business. The core value of relationship of brother and sister will disappear. Courts base their wisdom on HINDU succession laws from Mitakshara who is mentioned by Yajnavalka. Yajnavalka was not known to Hindus in India till British invaded here. Hence Mitakshara is fake, Yajnavalka is fake, their commentaries on the Hindu Laws are fake and we're custom made by White invaders to implode India from within. In reality.... Once a daughter is wed by a Hindu father and he performs Kanya Danam ritual, the DNA and lineage of the married daughter gets attached with the family of her husband for the remainder of her life. The father lovingly bestows upon her all he wishes at the time of her marriage with gifts for life called Streedhan. This Streedhan word is now being misused in divorces by women in India only. This concept is alien to the world and they are satisfied only with Alimony. After receiving the Streedhan, the daughter takes holy vow to never leave her husband who now becomes her protector for life. Husband will make use of her Streedhan as a last resort to protect her under situation of extreme calamity. Father of the bride considers it Taboo to demand even a glass of water from his daughter husband for life. This is because in ancient SANATAN DHARMA a gift once given can never be taken back. Kanya Daanam is the biggest gift that any man can give in his life time. Father literally shears a part of his heart and gifts the groom his treasured hand of his loving daughter for her future safe keeping to his son in law. This is natural because no father can be expected to live as long as his beloved daughter and to protect her after him, he marries her to a suitably strong male. The Hindu Father knows that his lineage will be carried forward and his legacy will be taken care by his own son who is the recipient of the rest of his estates to nourish it and expand his vision of happy family ahead. White invaders could not digest this happiness of every Hindu family and they DEVICED a method of ruling us by their laws that will create rivalry between the brother and sister, husband and wife, father and son and so on.

[@latakakkar112]

Sir, it seems you are not capable of anything on your own😊 Of course your wife is also a daughter of somebody. Daughters and sons are equal in the eye of law and the nature .for their rights and duty. So brother be cool.enjoy yourself.

[@cstechguruji.Hari5]

Really Great Sir ,I am not lawyer still nicely able to understand the lectures। Useful thanks 👍

[@yatikaverma6651]

Kash Mai bhi iss superb Friday Group ki member bn pati

[@atultungare5978]

I am practicing advocate at Mumbai. I heard your complete lecture. It was very exhaustive and helpful. I feel you ought to have mentioned the judgment of Uttam very. Saubhag Singh reported in AIR 2016.Pl.add the above citation in your next lecture. Thanks for enlightening us on the effects of Amendments.

[@nerfsmashers5793]

Hindu succession Act is very well explained by supreme Court Advocate on Record.

[@BC-ky7ps]

Well presented by Mr.Prit Jha.

[@harikrishnan9713]

Thank you, sir . The nuances of partition laws were well explained cogently.

[@sheelan3031]

Very helpful for everybody, thanks Sir.

[@prakashah1189]

I am from South India I think I got from this video's and sharadha bless you

[@advocatesharadkumarshukla2007]

great work sir. i am glad to get such knowledge

[@itsrahul1994]

Grandfather Father Son Grandson Great grandson

[@umar255]

Sir pl clarify whether no daughter/son have share in their fathers property who are born before 1956&father died befor2005 its very urgent I want to produce it in my fathers property case as evidence also mention ur fee to my mail tanq

[@drsundipshenoy2471]

🙏☺️

[@abhishekrangenahalli1113]

Thanks you sir it's 100% helpful to juniors

[@jammy1785]

Very nice

[@hemavenkatrau]

Excellent speech

[@nileshjoshi107]

Sir in short it's beautiful even still today there is so much conflict in regard to right of female property

[@prakashah1189]

Thank you very much and appreciate

[@rajkumar-kd7yj]

Sir let me know if weather Hindu succession actis applicable to Schedule Tribes? If yes kindly give few judgements.

[@rakeshkumarmeena4171]

The father dies in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, who dies. The father belongs to a Scheduled Tribe and has got agricultural land in the ancestral part. In this, apart from declaring their daughters as Scheduled Areas, whether they are entitled to the rights in the area or not. If any such notification is issued by the state government or the central government, then clarify it. This is a point of contention.

[@antrikshachatterjee368]

How much time does it take to settle property case Sir

[@sachinkeni3548]

Thanks, i have one quastion 13(2)of constitution oppose to make any laws which are incosistant with part 3 of constitution are invalid. in that way equal rights garanteed under article 14. Then others laws can not be made which violate article 14. pl Answer.....thanks

[@mahesharyal394]

I kindly request you to have a lecture on principles of writ laws and its concept.

[@lingarajdharmayat923]

Sir, pl clarify section 6(1)proviso & section (6). E xplainatin. Other things are very good. Thanks

[@reyansh4640]

Case डिसीजन-- We the juveniles after admonishing them. There shall be no disqualification of the juvenile and records concerning to this case shall be removed that the concerned authority as per section 19 of the juvenile Justice act 2000. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance. पुलिस वेरिफिकेशन में सरकारी नौकरी में दिक्कत आएगी सर

[@ghanshyamnagar6967]

सर प्लीज बताओ हरिद्वार में पुरुषों के रखें बही खातों को सुप्रीम कोर्ट सबूत के तौर पर मान्यता देता है यदि और कहीं पर कोई सबूत उपलब्ध ना हो तो

[@ankitamaji5329]

Sir amer baba oner house amer choto sister ka donate karoche ami tar birudha kichu karte pari ki

[@purnachandramohanty9184]

Please clarify after death of father in a 3 daughter & 01 son family . Only son sale all property without taken permission of daughter from 1995 to 2000( means before 20 Dec 2004).In this situation daughter can claim partition or share on sold up property long back before 20 Dec 2004 by the son or not ?

[@bagulrahul582]

Thank you Sir

[@allariravibabu2031]

Good evening sir Is there any amendment in 2015 regarding the class 1 and 2 heirs sir? Please let me know sir

[@sureshsetty3744]

SIR, If a daughter was born before 1956is succession act 1956 is equal share is available.

[@rishabhvarshney6396]

No

[@PP-zr3ih]

@@rishabhvarshney6396 how?

[@PP-zr3ih]

@@rishabhvarshney6396 pls explain??..

[@sandeepsinghsoni]

♥️♥️🇮🇳

[@MuraliKrishnaLanka-v1c]

As on the date of filing of of the partirion suit. No properries are existing in the nqme of karta. Case laws latest

[@ankitm7139]

Thank you!

[@Towardslight111]

Good

[@GlobalSkillCentre]

Sir, If Hindu mother died without making a will 1. Will married daugher and unmarried daugher both get the property? 2. Will father also have share in the property? 3. Will only unmarried daugher have right in the property?

[@satishpathak3869]

There is provision of transfer of property from daughters parent to inlaws but not from inlaws to daughter parents even if they are poorer than inlaws. Males ko bali ka bakra bana diya

[@bunty5520]

RIGHT

[@bunty5520]

THIS ACT MEANS MANY MURDERS 🩸🗡

[@saketkashyap8983]

Hello sir.... My question is A Hindu widow can be gift her husband's property to her Brother'Son

[@aksshaysharma96]

If it's husbands self acquried property then not, if husband dies intestate then only such which lawfully belongs to wife.

[@saketkashyap8983]

@@aksshaysharma96 This is joint state property her husband died in 1920 ....she was gifted to her Brother'son in 1968.... Some Advocate suggest me that she has no title but they not exactly clear nd give ruling regading this matter so plz as per possible help me

[@hazurasingh9191]

Please confirm a father can execute the WILL of ancestors property

[@srinivasgm2523]

My wife mother another Sister and a brother divided the property in 1998.The property was acquired on death of her father death. My wife died on 04.06.2018 The brother and another sister have sold their partitioned properties prior to death of my wife Now the brother has without to my notice has at transfered to his mother an illiterate LTM then killing her he has transfered to his name.He has unofficiially changed his name and declared that my wife is unmarried what can be done

[@APsingh-sci]

Good explanation

[@sumandey3973]

Sir can a person gift all his self acquired property to his son depriving his married daughter without her consent

[@amyvoyager]

Yes he can. As the person has self owned property so it will be his own volition to transfer property owned by him with his own earned funds.

[@PintuKumar-me4nx]

इंसान बने

[@RajaKumar-mr8wh]

जैसे की कोई पैथिरीक् सम्पति है अगर माता पिता की मृत्यु 1990 मे हो गई है मगर उनके पुत्रो मे अभी तक बटवारा नही हुआ है तो क्या उस पैथिरीक् सम्पति मे शादी शुदा बेटी का अधिकार होगा

[@acrlegal2482]

Frst maitain throat clear......

[@satishpathak3869]

If the married girls inlaws are richer than her parents then what? Secondly if the married girl is only interested in transfering funds and property from parents to inlaws then what? Who will insure that she looks after her parents, particularly if she and her inlaws are living far off?

[@gurdeepgill6224]

How the property is divided if will is made by the deceased and wife is not mentioned in the will.she is the second wife dudnot luve with the husband from first day of marriage and have no children from the deceased

[@PintuKumar-me4nx]

पॉलिटिक्स है

[@adarshverma877]

What if father died before 2004

[@sajagraja6361]

Daughter can't claim. Death defines the title.

[@boyavenkatesu3267]

@@sajagraja6361 Father died before 2004 without Will and no partition among sons, where do daughters stand of right to claim?

[@RDayal-qr6ip]

@@boyavenkatesu3267 HUF did not give rights till the Law was amended. Prior to amendment law is clear as property was planned accordingly . I would suggest let the daughter And son in law put their property in the HUF and then divide itv.

[@samadarshikar9408]

Doesnot matter. Vinita sharma case suprem court said by birth daughter will get irrespective of father death. Untill unless there is no separation happened by civil suit or register deed.

[@ShwetaMohitsharma]

The subject which has a very wide scope and has not been explained in a proper manner. Many concepts have been explained incorrectly. The concepts should have been explained in their true spirit and not as per the judgements of SC only, which are conctrovercial if they lay down a good law or not. Disappointing!

[@rakeshkumarmeena4171]

In the ancestral agricultural land of Scheduled Tribes, do daughters have no right to get equal share of sons in the state of Rajasthan. Will bother to explain this by mentioning the relevant law.

[@srinivaserat3720]

Dear Sir, Thanks for this beautiful articulation. I am writing this to seek your legal opinion on the below-mentioned sequence of events: My maternal grandfather and his wife (my maternal grandmother) had 4 daughters and one son (my maternal uncle). Out of 4 daughters 2 have expired and 2 are alive today (one of whom is my mother). On the death of my maternal grandfather in the year 1951, his property devolved upon his wife (My maternal grandmother) and his son (my maternal uncle). Thereafter the property was again taken on Pattam from the original Janmi by my Maternal uncle and his mother (my maternal grandmother) in the year 1953 by way of registered Pattam deed. A partition deed was executed between maternal grandmother and maternal uncle and eldest aunt (my mother’s eldest sister) without the knowledge of my mother and my mother’s sister. The other two daughters viz. my mother and my mother’s sister were not given their share in the property as they were born before the advent of the Hindu Succession Act, in the year 1956. Eldest aunt was given the share as she was a spinster and was ailing from heart ailment. After the death of maternal grandmother in the year 1985, the whole property was devolved upon my maternal uncle alone. 1. Now as per the Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005, all daughters irrespective whether they were born before 1956 or thereafter and are alive as on today, are entitled to their share in their father’s property. In view of this, are the daughters (my mother and my mother’s sister) entitled for their share in their father’s property? 2. We would also like to understand if this partition deed done is legally valid as it was without the knowledge and acceptance of my mother and my mother’s sister. On the death of my maternal grandfather would it not have been a deemed partition with the property being equally shared? Please let me know if you need any further information. We would appreciate if you can help with your reply.

[@shivraajpatil450]

Very poor language.

[@KKK-eu6mz]

Great job sir... but it is opined that, you just left us with so many queries unattended..as usual in line or tune with the other lawmakers...

[@scientificspiritualityBHARAT]

Pls sign this petition to save Indian family values. Unmarried daughter naturally have their undivided right and as per tradition, earning brother has to care for his unmarried sister after the demise of their father or both parents. Even Married sisters are looked after in all aspects by Brothers if his sister becomes a Widow, or is a Divorcee and has no assets of her deceased or divorced husband. Today almost every urban married woman is working and earning too. Such married women generally do not contribute to the financially weak brother in any manner as this is not acceptable by the society and the brother has to fend for himself. All Hindu personal laws can be made only as per the set tradition and norms of age old customs which have been followed to protect sanctity of relationship between family members. Can any law enacted be anti family,? is the question. Even today, many Hindu fathers do not feel the need to make their last Will and testament on the firm belief that their married daughters will not claim suddenly after their demise from their son, who is left with no choice but to give half share as per law. Point is... In this process the relationship between such a married sister and brother ends on a very bad note. They stop talking with each other for life due to the evil design of a mindless and biased law. There is no respect left after such brother suddenly has to sell his ancestral home which provided shelter to sisters in times of distress for several generations. He is forced by law to sell and alienate his house of ancestors as his well established married sister now has law in her side to demand a partition. Therefore this petition to call for abolition of the unmindful Amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, 2005 which has now caused big rift in the Hindu Families of India www.change.org/p/government-of-india-stop-double-benefit-to-married-daughter-in-estate-of-deceased-father?recruiter=false&recruited_by_id=2c72eae0-b81a-11e9-8015-1da649b8981c This decision by the Apex Court will certainly break the pious relationship between a brother and sister. Married sisters will be double beneficiaries of both husbands property and fathers property. Relations will get spoiled as the brother will have to sell his ancestral home and give half from established family business. Daughters Have Coparcenery Rights Even If Their Father Was Not Alive When Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 Came Into Force: SC www.livelaw.in/top-stories/hindu-succession-amendment-2005-has-retrospective-effect-161260?infinitescroll=1#.XzJGgDJxRdA. Dear readers, because of this decision in the coming years Hindus will consider their cousins and aunts as enemies. From the very childhood the male heir will be now the loser, in heirship and this will dissuade him to do anything constructive for his family or family business. The core value of relationship of brother and sister will disappear. Courts base their wisdom on HINDU succession laws from Mitakshara who is mentioned by Yajnavalka. This Yajnavalka was not known to Hindus in India till British invaded here. Hence Mitakshara is fake, Yajnavalka is fake, their commentaries on the Hindu Laws are fake and we're custom made by White invaders to implode India from within. In reality.... Once a daughter is wed by a Hindu father and he performs Kanya Daanam ritual, the DNA and lineage of the married daughter gets attached with the family of her husband for the remainder of her life. The father lovingly bestows upon her all he wishes at the time of her marriage with gifts for life called Streedhan. This Streedhan word is now being misused in divorces by women in India only. This concept is alien to the western world and they are satisfied only with Alimony. After receiving the Streedhan, the daughter takes holy vow to never leave her husband who now becomes her protector for life. Husband will make use of her Streedhan as a last resort to protect her under situation of extreme calamity. Father of the bride considers it Taboo to demand even a glass of water from his daughter husband for life. This is because in ancient SANATAN DHARMA a gift once given can never be taken back. Kanya Daanam is the biggest gift that any man can give in his life time. Father literally shears part of his heart and gifts the groom his treasured hand of his loving daughter for her future safe keeping to his son in law. This is natural because no father can be expected to live as long as his beloved daughter and to protect her after him, he marries her to a suitably strong male. The Hindu Father knows that his lineage will be carried forward and his legacy will be taken care by his own son who is the recipient of the rest of his estates to nourish it and expand his vision of happy family ahead. White invaders could not digest this happiness of every Hindu family and they DEVICED a method of ruling us by their laws that will create rivalry between the brother and sister, husband and wife, father and son and so on. So... so... Please sign this petition to save original family values in India. Let's reenact all HINDU laws as per our time tested traditions, mores and norms. 🙏🏼🌹🇮🇳🚩🕉️

[@reyansh4640]

Case डिसीजन-- We the juveniles after admonishing them. There shall be no disqualification of the juvenile and records concerning to this case shall be removed that the concerned authority as per section 19 of the juvenile Justice act 2000. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance. पुलिस वेरिफिकेशन में सरकारी नौकरी में दिक्कत आएगी सर