Sieve Analysis | WET Sieving and DRY Sieving

[@PrakashSingh-gw7yb]

Why was 1.18 mm seive placed over 2.36 mm it was obvious it won't have any retention The correct order would be 4.75-2.36 then 1.18

[@CivilEngineeringVibes]

"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."

[@lolalove3151]

The BS1377 wet sieving method is more straightforward, thank you

[@mithinshah6113]

why 425 micron sieve not used

[@ayangaming1350]

Very comprrhensive Thanks for sharing

[@mabrook9536]

Thank you sir.

[@visakasview7466]

Since sieve of 2.36 is misplaced below 1.18 the entire test result would change

[@DilipKumar-ji4im]

Wet sieve analysis 11:58

[@glocktopus888]

ty

[@bagavathi1635]

HI sir this instrument company share sir

[@susmitalimbupeko]

2.36 mm should be above 1.18 mm

[@CivilEngineeringVibes]

"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."