Sigma 150-600 F/5-6.3 Contemporary Vs Sigma 150-600 F/5-6.3 Sport Lens Shootout

[@vojtaG]

I can not believe how a video this good has only so little views. Really underrated in my opinion.

[@PhotoFeaver]

Thank you for your support! It really helps my channel grow :)

[@johnnyutah7299]

Totally agree.

[@martinhotmann7868]

Totally disagree! No images provided when it comes to EVERYTHING he does have an opinion on!

[@alanaperture]

I wish you showed sample images to show what you mean by the sports lens was sharper, every other video I’ve seen say sharpness was about the same and with no noticeable difference in image quality. One video also showed comparison shots at different focal lengths and apertures and stated he could see no difference.

[@martinhotmann7868]

Absolutely!!! Apples to Apples comparisson... but not for us .. lol. Direct downvote!

[@milesbickford2624]

I own both and the contemporary is actually sharper at its longest focal length lol

[@yasin6904]

Yh the whole video seemed biased towards the more expensive one lol

[@peterschumann661]

Excellent video man, very well explained in detail, now I know which one to buy, you already have a new follower, I wish you much success, I send you hugs from Peru

[@rahultj89]

How both lens act when we shoot a moving subject ! Likd shooting flying bird ?

[@PHOT0GUY]

Adding a UV filter does not reduce lens flaring. In fact, adding another glass surface is likely to increase flaring or ghosting. A super multi coated filter is less likely to add flare than using a non multicoated filter. 2.8 meters is not the lens minimum focussing distance, it's the lens minimum autofocus distance. Mine manually focusses to under 2.6 meters. Sample variation can make either lens sharper than the other when comparing any pair of contemporary and sport lenses. On average I would expect the sport to be a bit sharper. Cheap filters can destroy sharpness. I tried a cheap polaroid filter, it created a donut of blurriness between center and edge of frame.

[@mosquito8038]

Is the contemporary not available for Sony e mount?

[@paulpisanitv]

what makes it sharper? What is the difference in each camera that would make for this ?

[@PPPEEEKABO]

What's better?

[@ifilmic]

Super helpful, was struggling with choice

[@PhotoFeaver]

Glad I could help!

[@bruxi1111]

This vid should have 10,000 likes

[@kathyrager6695]

Does the sport need a teleconverter on a Sony a6000

[@muskateer10]

Is there any difference in Zoom operation? I have heard that it is very slow to soom the contemporary.

[@av11xx10]

you can remove the tripod color on the sport one just unsrew the black knob sitting at the side of it like on the hood then it will come right of :)

[@noahm44]

Thank you ♥️

[@ГеннадийГенн]

Hello, which of these lenses is optically better Nikon 200-500 or Sport 105mm

[@s87343jim]

Just wondering how does adding another glass element helps to reduce lens flare?

[@PhotoFeaver]

It's not be adding of the glass element that help reduces lens flaring, it's the coating of that new glass element that reduces light scattering, the primary cause of lens flaring and a lack of contrast. I hope that helps

[@PHOT0GUY]

@@PhotoFeaver The same elements that are under the filter will still create the same amount of lens flaring. The coating of the filter does not change the light passing through it to the lens, it just means that a multi coated filter exhibits less flaring than a non coated filter. The lens elements will still create the same amount of flare, otherwise all lens manufacturers would need to do to fix lens flare would be to add more multicoating.

[@JasonRN]

Hello. I was curious what the difference between the 2 lenses is for continuous shooting?? I do photos for my son's baseball team and do a lot of burst/continuous shooting to try to catch plays. I have always had Nikor lenses for my Nikon D7500, so just seeing if there is significant difference between the contemporary vs the sports. Thanks.

[@mikejeskin7420]

Should have no difference in that regard

[@-esseff-]

This is a really good video. Great detail.

[@chrislognshot]

what camera was this on. looking for nikon test between the both

[@PhotoFeaver]

This was on a Canon! thanks for your comment! :)

[@e.s583]

I'm not good in english so I can't understand 100% what you saying, but this video really helped choose the lens between C and S. Thanks for sharing the video!

[@PhotoFeaver]

Happy to hear that!

[@ZeldagigafanMatthew]

If money is of no concern, then 9 times out of ten, you should go for the more expensive item, but if cost is a concern, then you need a lot more nuance. This is the main reason I opted for the Contemporary version.

[@SurferBro1000]

How about weather dealing?

[@PhotoFeaver]

Hi, the sport lens has better weather sealing if that's what you are looking for? Thanks for the comment!

[@andygray7776]

Great video thanks. Did you notice any difference in auto focus speed and accuracy between the two lenses? How well weather sealed is the contemporary version?

[@BuckBrothersProjects]

very nice tutorial it touched on everything I wanted it to.

[@agentorange1291]

Hmm sad that you didnt mention something about autofocus speed on moving subjects like birds, cars, planes etc....

[@Bangkitdion]

after seeing the comments I already understand about the weather seal feature and build quality, but I'm getting confused about the sharpness of these two lenses because some people think the c version lens is sharper

[@captinktm]

Best review I have seen.

[@christydaniel4140]

Can i use Sigma 150-600mm contemporary version on Sony a6400

[@benuovir]

With a MC-11 Adapts EF Lens to Sony E Body

[@chippie779]

You can buy the sigma 150-600mm sport now on the sony e mount

[@charlesfick729]

I myself would need to see the images in all comparisons

[@LPius]

Thank you for this Video, it helps me a lot what i want to buy.

[@striderwhiston9897]

Odd, a few other reviews said the contemporary was sharper, and others say they're equal Seems they have identical optics with quality variation

[@Ninja-Alinja]

apparently the contemporary is 1/3 stop faster than the sport around 350mm. can anyone confirm that?

[@skakdosmer]

I've seen other comparisons between these two lenses where the Contemporary was sharper, so I think on the average they're probably about even. I've never tried the sports version, but I do own the Contemporary, and I certainly have no complaints about the sharpness. By the way, very few people use UV filters now. Every digital camera already has an inbuilt UV filter (sitting on the sensor) which is probably better. And the filter offers no protection whatsoever against damages. The front element of the lens is much sturdier that any filter. So the only value of a UV filter is protection against getting dust, dirt, grease and grime onto the lens. So if you think that's a problem, by all means get a filter.

[@higinoe-tv7014]

an you do review of Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS Sport and the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary video and photo stabilization put the milimeter how far and distance the video and photo take lake video & photo in 200mm , video & photo in 300mm in video in 400mm , video & photo in 500mm and video & photo in 600mm how it perform in video and photo stabilization thanks

[@TRIAMedia]

Great video! I've only noticed one issue, in "Filter Size" section, you show a screen shot of the 105mm at 160 pounds, not 200 pounds. Thanks a lot for all this data! Cheers!

[@djmills9549]

Great video. In NZ the C lens is $1800NZD as opposed to the S lens which is $2900. Im trying to decide whether the extra $1100 will be worth it for the sport lens, as i plan on doing motorsport photography. Is there much difference between the autofocus on the 2 lenses?

[@seangray4512]

You might want to check again, price is $2,549.00 for the sports lens at Auckland Camera/ Photo warehouse

[@KoneStone1]

Go for sport mate. I have Sport version for Canon EF and Canon EXT 2x III and this setup is amazing with R6. Was abelto get usable quality even at forest where you need to pump ISO a litle. Mostly did 1500-2000 ISO and only pixel peeping shows grain there. Auto focus and eye tedection works well. I did do some tuning with Sigma doc by reducing focusing speed and limited focusing area to far end. Cheap 1200mm there and with APS-C 1920mm.

[@djmills9549]

@@KoneStone1 interesting that the sport was fine. People find that with the C the autofocus "pulses". Anyways I ended up getting the C, but am getting rid of it now as I have a 400mm 2.8 and a 1.4x converter now.

[@KoneStone1]

@@djmills9549 I have heard a lot of pulsing problems with R7 but you can do a lot with right camera and Sigma doc settings.

[@djmills9549]

@@KoneStone1 Yeah its weird because ive used it on an R3 and didnt notice any pulsing at all...

[@suprarune]

ive seen about 10 videos on both of these lenses and some of them where pro photographers and they could almost not see any different in image quality on these, but the sport was a tad sharper, but for any amateur or hobby photographer it wouldnt be noticed and for under 1000$ it was more bargain than the sport lens.

[@gilsontopfstedt3554]

very nice review.

[@kevywilliams3304]

The c doesn’t focus properly :( I’m out of money and very disappointed

[@Bangkitdion]

what camera series are you using?

[@alanperez4921]

Try changing your focus option to point

[@a2roland]

Awesome! Thank you!

[@alanperez4921]

I order the cheap one but honestly sport will mostly be better in any way since it’s 2 times the price

[@1XX1]

Amazon has several 105 mm multi-coated UV lenses under 100.00, -just sayin

[@brightsimukonda5441]

Am always coming back here to watch reviews of lens I can’t afford because photography is my hobby 😢😢😢

[@ImNotQualifiedToSayThisBut]

Save for it

[@shaun1040]

I don’t think he covered weather sealing during build quality. For wildlife photographers who shoot in tropic or rainy environments, the weather sealing in the sport lens is priceless. As a 1dx shooter, having a fully weather sealed setup is fantastic. Does get extremely heavy pairing a 1dx2 with the sport but eh. It rains a lot where I live haha

[@shaun1040]

@@user-yw2si2hm3u nope. Contemporary is not fully weather sealed like the sports one.

[@Bangkitdion]

@@user-yw2si2hm3u so they both lens have same weather sealing? no differences? the difference just is the mention of the name of the weather sealing feature?

[@shaun1040]

@@user-yw2si2hm3u pretty sure the difference is in how they weather seal the lens. Contemporary it’s only the rear element whereas sport the whole barrel is weather sealed. Either way I’ve been shooting with my camera in the rain and I haven’t had any issues

[@wasil3k]

I just check and both lenses are at the same price now ;d

[@danfox1458]

If you want to do the sharpness the right way, First you never even stated what camera you was using, and secondly put said Camera on full auto to take out any bias from i prefer the sport

[@limelightmuskoka7237]

If weight is an issue then the Sigma 600-600mm really makes sense. But where this 60-600mm lens really shines is that it's one the few camera lenses that is "Parfocal" meaning it retains perfect focus at all zooms levels. A necessity for shooting high-end video. The Sigma 150-600mm sport is NOT PARFOCAL so if you shoot video this is not the sense for you. All Cine Lenses are par focal but Cinema lenses are quite expensive for this reason. Understand that more than 90% of the photography lenses by Canon, Nikon and yes Sony are not parfocal because the cost to make it that way. Some lens come close to being parfocal but be careful because if you are not paying attention you can get burnered by that almost perfect focus. For critical work keep it parfocal. Also even if you are not much of a videographer having the focus still perfect even though you have zoomed in and out is a boon for nature photographers.

[@willparsons32]

The sport version has bigger and better options - perhaps because it's also $1000.00+ more as well! As the ol' saying goes; you get what you pay for!!

[@ronchappel4812]

Really annoyed you didnt show the image quality comparison!

[@jensjordan89]

thank you for that comparison. good information. the video is sadly a bit too long. i wished there were more original pictures oder videos that were shot with these lenses. thank you

[@loboptlu]

Im shocked the twice as expnsive lens from the same manufacturer is better 😂. And unfortunately the price has exploded 1049 € for the contemporary with 1.4 extender , 999.89 without , and 1900 for the sports.

[@kentozapater8972]

Does this lens work on my Sony alpha A7

[@benuovir]

The sport will without an adapter, the contemporary with a MC-11 Adapts EF Lens to Sony E Body

[@p382742937423y4]

The weight of that sportslens, is a MASSIVE problem.

[@-WhizzBang-]

Well gee, the lens that is almost $1000 MORE expensive is better. Who would have guessed! LMAO

[@johnnyyu68927]

There is no need to compare at all. All indicators of the sports model are better than the C model, but the weight and volume are larger and heavier. This is obvious from visual observation. You can know the advantages and disadvantages from the price positioning. Your so called "Compare" is a bit redundant~

[@frostybe3r]

I decided to buy an EF 600mm f/4 L IS II USM instead.

[@PhotoFeaver]

Thats is such a good lens. Amazing detail and resolution. Hope you enjoy it. Hopefully getting a review unit of that lens soon 😃

[@iwaswithyourmom9410]

good for you. even though that lens wasn't compared here....

[@alanperez4921]

12k lens ? Way over the range of the sigma lens

[@tarr1846]

gotta hit the gym if you wanna shoot handheld💀

[@Whiterabbittail69]

So pretty much save your money and buy the sport, u can tell from the beginning of the video. It's obvious.