Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary Review for Bird and Wildlife Photography

[@Duade]

G'day all, I have released a video with updated AF settings to reduce the pulsing on Canon Mirorless bodies. kzbin.info/www/bejne/omi3dqhnicyka6s I hope you enjoy, Cheers, Duade

[@ordyhorizonrivieredunord712]

I have to watch this 🦉

[@alohamark3025]

Your honesty and humility are much appreciated. Very valuable for those with old cameras, looking to upgrade to the newer models (R5, etc.).

[@Duade]

@@alohamark3025 My pleasure Mark, Cheers, Duade

[@blassedtwc9307]

Hiii

[@blassedtwc9307]

Hi

[@abhishektiwari2101]

I really really love how you show the RAW/edited photos so it is so much easier for me as a young amateur to understand what aspects you touch upon to get those beautiful results! Thank you, subscribed just a couple of minutes into this video :D

[@Duade]

That is great to hear, I will continue to show the Raw conversion, Cheers, Duade

[@Agfhhh6]

I really like that too.

[@Duade]

Sigma have responded that the Sigma 150-600C is not compatible with the Eye Tracking Servo mode of the Canon mirrorless bodies. You will need to use single shot AF to get accurate autofocus. The AF will still work in tracking mode but you will get inconsistent focus as I have demonstrated. Cheers, Duade

[@photo_shoot_travel]

Thats very bad news, for now what lens do you reccommend for a new R7? Canon RF 100-500 it great but a little above budget.

[@LoneWolf-qz5fy]

@@photo_shoot_travel very good point

[@ottenburger]

I use M6 mark II (APS-C sensor same as in 90D 32Mpix) with Sigma 150-600 and unfortunately there is the same problem as in R5 sharp, sharp, sharp, soft (in single spot AF-C mode)

[@orloaguilar]

@@photo_shoot_travel Yeah kinda disappointed, just got the 150-600C to use with the R7 when I get it so i'll have to change lenses eventually if the focus proves to be too inconsistent

[@daveg3138]

Hi Duade. I have the 150-600. I wonder will Sigma make a compatible 150-600 for mirrorless R7?

[@PhotographerSen]

Man, Sigma should approach you with an award only for making this video. Managed to see it till the end (birding patience kicked in). Thanks for that refocus tips. Gotta come handy for me. 🙂

[@Duade]

Thanks mate, you did well making it until the end without falling asleep :-) Cheers, Duade

[@pratapslair]

@@Duade how are you so modest...?♥️

[@BruceGoett]

I really like your comment about sharpness - I sometimes obsess over taking super sharp images and overlook a really nicely composed photo because it's grainy or not as sharp as I think it should be.

[@guyjackson4143]

That is without a doubt the best review of a camera lense that I have seen posted on any channel. The fact that I own the lense is definitely a plus. The time and effort you put into this video is amazing. I own all three of the lenses that your friend owns and totally agree with him on the quality of the equipment and its results. Thank you for the video. I plan on purchasing the 90D at some point after the new year.

[@Duade]

Guy, thanks for such nice feedback, I appreciate it. Nice to hear you are enjoying your Sigma lenses. 90D is great for its price, the AF lacks behind the mirrorless bodies but it does take nice shots. I am looking forward to an APSC mirrorless body from Canon with Eye AF, that will be great. Cheers, Duade

[@fgb3126]

@@Duade Agreed. I really am used to APS-C and don't know if I'd like full frame. Of course I "suffer" from age - you know, 'old dog, new tricks'?

[@RickRose]

I love the fact that you tested the lens with an old 40D. Makes an intriguing proposition for someone interested in getting into wildlife photography for the first time. I've recently dipped my toe with a used 7D mkii (USD$500) and a used Canon L 400/5.6 (USD$700), and I am hooked. I think this is a good time for budget-minded novices.

[@Duade]

Thanks Rick, yes, there are some great DSLR and Lenses on the used market with many switching to mirrorless. That was the kit I used for a long time 7D/400 5.6. Cheers, Duade

[@SpiritualVibesGM]

YEP ME TO... That was a great idea!

[@brucea.kenney7957]

I am a wee bit jealous. I think it would be so awesome to live where there is so much diversity in wildlife. I find your videos are so informative and just extremely detailed. Thank you sir

[@jessicamahon5900]

I REALLY appreciate that you share the OC shots and outline how you cropped them. it's so beneficial for those learning!!!

[@Duade]

It is my pleasure Jessica, Cheers, Duade

[@Stran8n]

I bought my 150-600mm about a year and a half ago. I used to have an older Sigma 150-500mm EX DG OS HSM that I bought back in 2012 to shoot my son's high school soccer games. Then I sold it to buy it's successor when I started birding in the summer of 2020. I also paired it with a 90D and got excellent results - eventually. The 90D was a little more advanced than my old Rebel T3i (600D) and I had a lot of soft shots early on due to my inexperience. I wish we could share photos here - I would show you some of my favorite shots with both Sigma lenses. Duade, I just wanted to add that I really enjoy your videos! I like learning from your experience and seeing your photos of the birds and other wildlife of Australia. Thank you and Merry Christmas!

[@Duade]

Craig, thanks for sharing your experience and the lovely feedback, I really appreciate it. Feel free to send me some shots at [e-mail] Cheers, Duade

[@garretduthie8665]

I've had the sigma 600 for over a year now. I use it with my r6, it has gotten me some amazing results. The focus pulsing is real and can be frustrating at times. It did open up a world of wildlife photography that never existed for me before. If you are on a more limited budget I highly recommend!

[@Duade]

Garret, thanks for sharing your experience, I agree for the price it delivers amazing quality that would cost 10x more for an f4 prime lens. Cheers, Duade

[@rui7773]

I store mine in a plastic box with a dehumidifier but every now and then a white dot appears inside! What do you do to avoid it?

[@JustAnotherDronePilot]

I appreciate this video a lot. I actually have purchased this lens after doing a bit of research and looking at what I wanted to get. I currently own a Nikon 75-300mm 5.6-6.3, and the Sigma 150-600mm fits what I was working up to. You actually going into detail about user error and fixing the ISO/Aperture/etc really helps me understand the limitations of the lens and how you shoot your photos. There are other KZbin videos where others are quick to blame the lens without providing the appropriate background information, while going straight to, "you wouldn't have this issue if you were using x lens or y lens." To me, this video fully encompasses an understanding of the limitations of the lens, while also showing just how capable of a lens it is, and I appreciate actual photos rather than just an explanation. Overall, very detailed information, and I'm going to have to come back to this video a few times to make sure I understand your explanations. I still consider myself more of a hobbyist when it comes to photography, but I'm getting there with understanding all the settings. Thank you again Duade!

[@ggwildlife]

Hi Duade, this was a top quality video, it covers absolutely everything that any photographer could wish to hear, the downfalls were great to listen to due to user error etc, so detailed, i love mine its pin sharp on my 40D, 7D, 90D & my 5D mkIII you covered a lot of variants that i have also come across which made me smile a few times, thank you once again for a quality video.

[@Duade]

It is my pleasure, I am glad to hear you enjoyed the video, Cheers, Duade

[@jan_wegener]

That 100-500 vid was definitely the most stable video you’ve ever taken handheld hahaha Great video mate

[@WernerBirdNature]

*LOL* I was indeed wondering why Duade took soo many images with the sigma when his 100-500 should have been superior .. but it was busy doing the other part of the job ;-)

[@Duade]

Lol, thanks mate, that means a lot. :-)

[@Duade]

Werner, Jan was ribbing me due to how shaky my footage usually is. I used the Sigma extensively for this review, I would usually use my prime or 100-500. Cheers, Duade

[@WernerBirdNature]

@@Duade @Jan Wegener Yeah, I follow both of you long enough to pick up that internal joke ;-) Actually you both are down under, but also very down to earth with your feet. You both aim for perfect bird shots, but you are not too vain to show it takes effort, patience and failure to achieve it, rather than being just great and affording the best gear. My professor used to say: In life you need to relativate everything, starting with yourself. And you seem to apply this principle👍. Happy holidays to both of you, and looking forward to enjoy more of your YT's in the next year. And hopefully a few YTs with you combined, even when I fear the distance between has grown a bit.

[@thehainanchannel]

Hi Duane, it’s videos like this that keep people coming back to this channel, really well done. I’ve had the sigma 150-600 for just over a year and I’ve been both very pleased, and extremely frustrated with it. Under ideal conditions, good light, optimal distance, little movement etc it works great and produces excellent images. In other situations, like a dull overcast early morning, I’ve come home with a bag of noisy, blurry images. I shoot on a 6D mark 2, (saving for an R6), and balancing high ISO and shutter speed sometimes feels like a game of attrition. The focus hunting has me grinding my teeth sometimes, (thanks for the tip on SS). If you live in a country like Australia, with bright sunny days and lots of light that’s great, but if you like somewhere like the UK or Ireland this lens can be difficult.

[@Duade]

Yes, I am very fortunate to live in a country with plenty of sun that is for sure. Thanks for the great feedback and sharing your experience, Cheers, Duade

[@PaulAmyes]

I'd really recommend getting hold of the dock and tuning the lens. You can adjust the acquisition speed and the accuracy and the OS. It can make a lot of difference.

[@cedric9370]

Duarde! One of the few that doesnt sugar coat his reviews.

[@Duade]

Thanks Cedric, I try to give an honest review. Cheers, Duade

[@fgb3126]

OK I watched this entire video Duade. I watched it with GREAT interest because I own a Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary and have it on my venerable Canon 7D Mark II. Actually I have owned two Sigmas. My first one got knocked pretty badly when I fell and thereafter, even using micro-adjust, it never was the same again. So...I sold that lens and bought...wait for it...ANOTHER Sigma 150-600mm. That's the one I have now and it has been much better than my first one even before I knocked it. I could not agree with you more. My bird photography teacher recommended this 150-600mm zoom as a way for me to get out to 600mm without having to pay an arm and another arm to get a Canon 600mm prime. I value the flexibility of zoom which you touched upon. Recently I was out in the field and an immature Bald Eagle appeared about 50 yards away from me and proceeded to fly right at me. I started to shoot it at 600mm but as it got closer and closer, I hastily took my zoom ring and backed out! Because of that I got a super image as the eagle flew literally right past me - I'd say it was about 5 yards away. I would never buy a prime lens given my age, arm strength, income bracket, and lens needs. Okay. Now - I have two Canon 7D Mark IIs, one I bought new and one used. I keep this Sigma on my best one and have my wonderful Canon 100-400mm Mark II lens on the used one. This is a permanent arrangement (I could never get the hang of switching lenses in the field). As a result I can compare the two lenses almost every time I go out. If I am going to be in the woods photographing small passerines I definitely want the Canon 100-400; it can auto-focus INSIDE of twigs and branches to get the bird. If I am going to be on the seashore, or open country, where I expect to see birds at some distance I use the Sigma. Frankly the Canon 100-400mm is in a class of its own. I bought mine soon after I began to photograph birds in about 2018 and that was a superb investment. It's the gift that keeps on giving. Built like a tank, probably nuclear bomb proof. Heavy. But I just love it and if/when I got to Canon's mirrorless cameras I can still use it. The Sigma is up against stiff competition as a result but I am more and more surprised and pleased with it. It's a perfect adjunct and when you put it on the Canon R5 I really perked up! I would be wanting to do that for sure b/c the cost of the Canon camera alone would be a big investment for me, and hence I would not initially be able to buy the Canon RF 100-500mm; although down the road I would be looking forward to it - esp. since it appears to be a worthy successor to the 100-400mm (which as I'm sure you know was specifically designed for the Canon 7D). So that's my tale. I hope this helps.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing and your use case highlights the power of both the 100-400 and the 150-600. We often need different tools for different jobs and you have that sorted. Thanks for sharing your experience. Cheers, Duade

[@bwanaron]

I watch a lot of camera gear videos on KZbin and yours are definitely the best. Your knack for good explanation and depth of real-life testing sets you apart. Even with its faults, I will probably buy this Sigma lens to mate with my older Canon 5D Mark II. I am a retired professional studio photographer but an amateur bird photographer, and it looks like this lens would be perfect for my new hobby. I'm glad I discovered your channel.

[@Duade]

Ron, welcome to the channel, I am happy to hear the video helped in your decision. Good luck with the lens and your bird photography. Cheers, Duade

[@berntolovhellstrom8891]

I got a sport version and i wasn't very happy with it. But, it changed one day when i bumped the tripod with my backpack and the lens took the hit on the ground. It stuck and needed some care so i sent it in and the cost was €350. When it returned it really amazed me about its change. Now everything was obviously adjusted to the better by the service guys. This lens is now one of the sharpest lenses i got as long as i keep it on the tripod and with decent shutter speeds. It also tells how little the lenses are adjusted in production and how little the dock actually can do. Guys with screw drivers and knowledge can do much better. And....you have produced one of the best Reviews on a lens, i've ever seen. You really deserve more subscribers!

[@Duade]

Thanks Bernt I appreciate the feedback, glad to hear your lens is performing well. I al sys struggled with the lens align tools and no doubt to professionals do an excellent job with calibration. Cheers, Duade 👍

[@s77hphotography]

I've owned this lens for 2,5 years now, started out using it on my Nikon D7200 then on a Nikon D800 and a Nikon D810, now I'm using it on my Nikon D850 and it has delivered crisp and sharp images on all the cameras I've used it on. I'm keeping this lens for sure and as a complement to it I have the Sigma EX 120-300 f2.8 wich is also a great lens, I've had the same auto focus issues you mentioned in the video but still not so much it's a headache so to say... Thanks for a great video I really enjoyed watching it! - Best regards, Stefan from Sweden.

[@Duade]

Stefan, thanks for sharing your experience, I appreciate it. Stay safe in your part of the world. Cheers, Duade

[@edwardfoster6367]

My experience has also matched yours. I started using the Sigma 150-600 on an 80D, and it was such a step up from the kit 70-300 that I was thrilled with it. It can take amazingly sharp photos, but it is a bit slow and not always easy to focus. I just recently purchased an R6. I am able to get a fairly good keeper rate on birds in flight, if they are 20 meters and beyond, but little birds and birds close up... it just can't keep up. On birds that are stationary though it is really good, far from perfect (but then again, so am I) but for the price, I am satisfied and will keep it until I can find something that works better that I can afford. I appreciate your channel and your work. Watching one of your videos feel like hanging out with one of my buddies. Thanks for all you do!

[@Duade]

Edward, congrats on the lens and the R6, a great combo for sure. Thanks for the feedback, that is the exact feel I am going for. Cheers, Duade

[@MikeBroderick]

Ed, I have a Canon 80D, I was thinking of buying this lens. It's at the limit of my budget so I'm wondering if you would recommend it for the 80D. I want to shoot wildlife photos. Thank for you reply in advance!

[@mistergiovanni7183]

Hopefully all reviews were made with this level of analysis. Not only is it a lot of valuable information about optics, but also how to technically take good photos, compose, etc. I'm going to watch it several times to assimilate all the information. Many, many thanks, Duade.

[@Duade]

It is my pleasure and thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it. Cheers, Duade

[@DalsPhotography]

I wanted to wish you the best for the New Year!!! I loved having being in touch with you! Let's hope next year will bring us all around again!

[@Duade]

Daniela, thank you for your ongoing support, I appreciate it. Happy New Year to you also. Cheers, Duade

[@barphoto1663]

I've been a pro photographer for 45 years and this the very best zoom (in this range) that I've ever used. The best.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade

[@mountainshadowknives9787]

Incredible review on this lens! I just got this lens about two weeks ago for my 90d. I have only used it minimally, however the times that I have had time to use it, it has given me great results. I will agree that the auto focus seems to lack slightly in low light conditions, but overall it is a great lens that has given me some tack sharp shots! I would highly recommend this lens for anyone getting started into wildlife photography. At a very affordable price, it is well worth the money for this nice of a lens.

[@Duade]

Braxton, congrats on the lens and thanks for sharing your experience. Cheers, Duade

[@michaeltuffin8147]

I have it also, and like you, seldom use it. It's a great piece to have in your toolkit, though, for when it is needed

[@Rick-wu9gu]

Thoroughly enjoyed the video, very thorough! I shoot the Sigma 150-600 on a Nikon D5, and I love it, and your video confirmed that. I have used it a bit for shooting birds, but mostly larger animals (not a lot of opportunity to shoot pretty birds in Western Canada this time of year (-22C here today). Where the lens has really impressed me has been with lunar photography. I have some amazing shots of the moon using that lens. I've used the Nikon 200-500, and find that the Sigma is its equal for the most part. The Nikon might be a touch quicker to focus, and if I'm honest its a tad sharper at long focal lengths. I've also used the Nikon 500mm prime, and I like the variability of the Sigma more. One downside I've noticed, that when paired with the D5, it can get a little heavy, so I've begun using a monopole. I would like to find someone who shoots the sigma and has fine tuned the focus using the docking port and would be willing to share the adjustments they made. Great work Duade!!

[@Duade]

Rick, thanks for sharing your experience, -22 sounds tough, we are a nice 32 today. Cheers, Duade

[@kaninrail]

Great review! I own this lens, but haven't had all that many opportunities to shoot with it yet. One benefit that I don't recall you mentioning to these super-zooms vs a prime lens is that (at least in my experience) it's a lot easier to scan for a bird at 150mm and then zoom in to capture it once you've found it in the viewfinder, than to find the bird with a locked long focal length prime lens and have to essentially sweep the landscape with a magnifying glass to figure out where your bird is (especially if you're trying to find a flying bird). My eyesight is godawful, even with glasses, so maybe folks with sharper vision find this easier to manage with a prime than I do? Regardless, it's great to see the kinds of shots you were getting out of this lens, it's given me some incentive to get back out there in the spring and see if I can improve my skills :)

[@Duade]

Thanks Kanin, very good point and very true, I do the same, I will be sure to mention that in future zoom lens reviews, Cheers, Duade

[@golamashraf1464]

Amazing review Duade! Detailed, real-world, an incredible testimony to your skills, and also an honest proof of the lens' limitations. Your review was like a breathe of fresh air... head and shoulders above the armchair pundits raving and ranting without any real experience in the art of photography. Thank you!

[@Duade]

Golam, you are too kind, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it. Cheers, Duade

[@sulemanabdullahsulemani1038]

How poetic! I just got my lens last week and its a sharp lens even with APS-C body

[@ZombieRofl]

The best Sigma 150-600mm review I could find period. That Sigma can deliver wassent something that I was surprised at. I own the 85mm art, and its a beast, specially if you look what you get for the money. That's a trend that's relevant for most of the Sigma lenses. Great job mate!

[@Duade]

Thanks for the feedback, I was surprised with the results I got with this lens. Cheers, Duade

[@1oldman4u2]

I love the photo with the dark background. I own three Sigma lenses and the 150 - 600 C is one of them. I normally use it with the Canon 90D but have tried it with the R6 also. I like to shoot most of my bird photos at f/9. As long as there is enough light to keep my ISO at no more than 4000 that is. I truly love the 150 - 600! Great video by the way!

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience and glad to hear you enjoyed the video. Cheers, Duade

[@Ambress]

I stumbled upon this video as one who has owned and used the this Sigma Contemporary 150-600mm lens since late 2019, yet I learned something new here....that lock on the lens isn't simply a lock for the lens in the fully retracted position for storage. When you mentioned it is a zoom lock, I had to explore and confirm that as something I hadn't noticed, and I also learned why. Yes, it is a zoom lock, but only at the marked focal lengths; between those marks the lock doesn't work. Still, a very convenient feature to prevent zoom creep when working at just one focal length as I often was doing with astrophotography. Great presentation!

[@Duade]

Daryl, that is great to hear, I'm glad the lens is working well for you. Cheers, Duade

[@allkar2957]

Hi Duade, your review is really not bad. For me this is the best budget zoom over 400mm. The RF100-500 is of course faster and in a different class, but not suitable for everyone in terms of price. So I find the Sigma to be the best solution for photography without going into excessive prices. I've had it on the 7D Mk II for 3 years and now on the R5 and find - you get more than you paid for. At least compared to native RF lenses and their prices. Cheers, Allan

[@Duade]

Thanks Allan, I agree, for its price it can't be beaten. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Cheers, Duade

[@jamesmcgraw8392]

I was about 5 minutes away from grabbing the Tamron 150-600 (which has gone up to $1400 USD) and then I saw this review and went with the Sigma, which I found new for $865 USD on Amazon. Awesome review, subscribed.

[@Duade]

Congrats James, that is a really good price, Cheers, Duade

[@eddozier2988]

Great review! I have had this lens for 7 years now, and use it on Nikon D7000, D7100, D610, D500, and D850. Never noticed any focus pulsing on any of these bodies, but D500 is definitely best for AF speed. I used the Sigma dock to program their "Speed Priority" AF instead of using the default "Standard" AF to get faster AF with latest firmware. The lens definitely needed the focus fine-tune calibration (4 focal lengths, 4 distances per focal length) on DSLRs. Sharp images, but even sharper using Topaz Denoise AI 'Clear' algorithm on the RAW files. Thanks Duade!

[@Duade]

Ed, that is great to hear it is working well on your Nikon gear, for its price it is great value. Cheers, Duade

[@rui7773]

What do you do to prevent fungus! I keep it with dehumidifier but it still shows little white dots! I keep it more at night because during the day I use it often, sometimes not! Does fungus proliferate in this range outside the box? Note: when it comes out of the box/dehumidifier, it always faces the light!

[@Duade]

@@rui7773 Fungus is more like creeping moss with tendrils going out I think. It sounds like you are doing everything right. If it doesn't impact your photos then I wouldn't worry too much about it. Likely sending it to be professionally cleaned is the only solution which is likely expensive. Cheers, Duade

[@annapalooza8686]

I have this on a d500. How do you fine tune ?

[@Duade]

Anna, you need to purchase the Sigma Dock which allows you to update firmware and make adjustments. Cheers, Duade

[@alanrannow5278]

Most thorough and seemingly honest review of this lense. Thanks for your time. Great shots.

[@Duade]

Thanks Alan, it is my pleasure, Cheers, Duade

[@DaveCox56]

I use this lens almost every day on my Nikon D7200 for bird photography. Budget combo that has given me a few images used in calendars etc, and outperforms a lot of newer and more expensive lenses. Even Sigma have used a couple online

[@daveevans7151]

Thanks for sharing this...I have an old D7000. It's just fun for me and not a prof by any means. I live in CO and have lots of wildlife opptys and can't wait to put it to good use. This review and your comment helped me make my decision. I have three baby big horn owls in a huge cottonwood tree in our neighborhood and the kit lens I have to 105 just doesn't cut it. Will get a chance to practice with them first!

[@inspiredartphotos]

I have used that combo. I love my D7200 with this lens. I have a Z9. I need to really try that combo!

[@cavedshukla4778]

What a detailed video man. No nonsense, just onto the point. You have put on so much work, kudos.

[@Duade]

Thanks for the feedback, it was a fun lens to test, Cheers, Duade

[@Martino2579]

Hi. A really good review. I’ve had the Sigma 150-600 C for about 6 months and use it on my 5D IV. I initially rented a lens and was very impressed. For the money it’s excellent. What you say about learning how to a) use this particular lens and b) learning the craft is spot on. I’ve had some super results, but also many soft or out of focus efforts. As you say the bad ones are invariably user error. I’m sure some more expensive kit would be better, but may well be wasted on me. Likewise, when I eventually go mirrorless, I’m sure I’ll benefit from things like the eye detection. However I’m sure the experience I get with my less sophisticated kit will help me there. Overall your review is almost exactly what I would say, so prospective buyers would be well served by your comments. Thank you for putting this together and I look forward to checking out your other videos.

[@Duade]

Martin, thanks for sharing your experience and great to hear it echoes my findings. Cheers, Duade

[@GOTOHOBBIES]

Hi Duade Thank you for your review of this len. I got it for a Christmas present, and wow, what a lens. I do aviation photography, and after asking other photographers what they used, naming the Sigma 150-600 was the most respected lens for capturing fast jets and aircraft. I did look at the canon 100-400 but just didn't have the reach and I totally agree yes it faster and sharper than the sigma but considering the results I have from the sigma 150-600, I am very pleased with images and the sharpness and speed focus gives excellent quality and a high keeper rate. I use the lens on a canon 5DS. Using a fast shutter speed to freeze the jets and avoid blurring. Overall, I would give the lens a 9 out of 10. It would get a 10 if Sigma adopted the same zoom configuration instead of the tube extending, apart from that, an excellent lens. If you are considering buying one, you will not be disappointed, but just buy the Sigma dock so you can upgrade the lens software and adjust the settings. It cost me about £40 in the UK. As a matter of interest, if you buy the canon mk 3, 70-200mm lens and the mk3 teleconverter, it is sharper than the canon mk2, 100-400mm lens as review by another KZbin channel. Because I was originally thinking of buying 100-400mm or buying the 70-200 mm and the 1.4x teleconverter, Because I wanted the sharper option, I bought the 70-200 mm and the 1.4x teleconverter. Obviously, my choice may be different to your preferences, but I am just giving you my honest thoughts, and my reasons are quality, sharpness, and the important factor was reach, I mentioned that I do aviation photography and photographing aircraft landing and taking off, My nearest airport to me in the UK is East Midlands Airport, I use the sigma 150-600 on my canon 5DS as the aircraft are approaching the runway which is over 2 miles away and further sometimes from my location at the other end of the runway. Obviously because of distortion in the air and the distance it is not perfectly clear but is achievable and I have taken shoots that are good enough to keep with the aid of software like Topaz, if you want to get better results buy the software because it is really good. Sorry for going on but the lens is well worth buying and Duade has given a excellent review and has my respect and gratitude. Many thanks mate always appreciated. Don't forget to buy the sigma Dock with the lens, it will help you upgrade firmware and adjust lens software settings.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience and great to hear the lens is working well for you, for its price it is hard to beat. Yes, the dock is helpful with updates etc. I must try avaition photography one day, probably a little more consistent in their flight path than a bird :-) Cheers, Duade

[@GOTOHOBBIES]

Thanks mate, always appreciate your euthanasia and help. Cheers, David.

[@encellon]

This the sharpest lens I have ever owned. It even out-performs my 50mm fixed focus lens. Amazingly, in decently bright light, the max'd-out OIS is enough to hand-hold at any FL. My only nit (true for every zoom lens) is how '600mm' is only true for the closest focus distance. When shooting at infinity, the max FL is only ~560mm.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience Ken, great to hear you are enjoying it, Cheers, Duade

[@jaycee6996]

Best review of wildlife lenses I have seen. I used to use the Sigma C 150-600 on my d500. It is for sale at the moment. I was finding the weight a problem after a day in the field. I am now in the market for a wildlife lens for my SONY A7 3 (shortly about to become an A7 4) for its size and weight the Tamron 150-500 looks the best option to me at the minute but the Sigma for the SONY looks also very attractive.

[@Duade]

Jaycee, yes, the weight can get a bit heavy using all day. The Tamron 150-500 was a beautiful lens but is not that much lighter then the Sigma unfortunately. Good luck with the lens you choose, Cheers, Duade

[@paulgibbings9553]

I've had mine for about 18 months now and have used it on Canon 80D & R6 and really can't complain. The AF isn't perfect, but it does represent amazing value for money (although when I checked out the exchange rate, I nearly fell off my chair at how cheap it is in Australia compared to here in the UK). I have found that with the eye tracking on the R6, it holds focus much better when moving horizontally across the frame than when coming towards me, but I suspect that this would be the case for most lenses. I'd love to try the RF 100-500, but at 4 times the price it would have to be a huge improvement to justify the cost for a amateur such as myself. For the time being I'll make do with deleting the soft images, knowing that in most circumstances I will come away with some wonderful pin sharp images as well.

[@Duade]

Paul what a great post and I totally agree with what you have said. Cheers, Duade

[@chadolson5537]

If you have a uv filter on the lens take it off. My auto focus got better immediately and so did my photos.

[@paulfrancis7207]

@@chadolson5537 so did mine. Good advice.

[@clairehachey2189]

This is an incredible lens! I've been using it on my old but trusty Canon Rebel SL1 for bird photography with incredible results. Once you learn to work with the lens and find the sweet spot, you will be blown away by the quality of the photos. I always work in RAW format and have had such wonderful results that I'm bypassing my editing software altogether. I had incredible results at both 1/400s and 1/1000s, F/8, ISO 200 @600mm. Thanks for an awesome video! Cheers!

[@Duade]

Thanks Claire, it is my pleasure and great to hear it is working so well for you. Cheers, Duade

[@darrenrowley5646]

I have this lens and everything you said in your video was spot on. Ive had exactly the same experiences. I have been blown away with how sharp this lens can be. The reach of 600 is bar far the biggest selling point along with getting sharp images. The down side as you experienced is the auto focus it is very hit and miss but not a huge amount. I recently took some action shots of bears play fighting and when I got back to edit I was a bit disappointed due to it missing focus even though it seemed I was in focus taking the shot. You are right in the fact that you need to burst shot a lot to get anything action wise and sometimes its just luck, but when you do hit the sweet spot boy does this lens take some fantastic shots. Low light is an issue compared to my canon 70-200Liii even when using flash. For instance when I have a flash and use live mode in the dark on the canon it displays on screen and also focuses better, but with the sigma its just dark and I can't focus. Overall though for the price I use this lens more than any other I've used and I tried using a 2x converter on my canon L70-200iii lens and it just was so bad at focusing so bought the sigma and love it. Great detailed vid covering everything and have subscribed :) Ive just bought a gimble to use with it at an air show next month so that will be a good test, great tip on turning image stable off when on a mount as hadn't thought of that.

[@Duade]

Thanks for taking the time to share your experience with the lens, I am happy you found the video helpful and useful. Good luck with your photography. Cheers, Duade

[@deborahhutchinson4518]

I have to say a massive thank you! I watched your video on this lens which has helped me out tremendously with my birds in flight shots. This weekend I have taken some of the best photos I’ve taken since buying the sigma 150-600mm lens. If I could hug you I would do !!!! Thank you so so much 😊

[@Duade]

Oh Deborah, that is too kind, I am happy to hear the videos are helping and you had a good time. Virtual hugs from this part of the world. Cheers, Duade

[@msyuan1124]

One of the best in-depth reviews of any lens. Great job!

[@Duade]

Mark, thanks for the feedback, I'm glad you enjoyed it, Cheers, Duade

[@spacewavecr]

Great video. This video cover everything. Really good review. This took you a while to create, and the end result is really pro!

[@Duade]

Thanks for the feedback, yes it too awhile but a good resource for those looking at the lens. Cheers, Duade

[@theoneandonlymattsmith]

Great review Duade. I've had the Sigma 150-600 C for over a year now which I use on my Canon 70D. I use it primarily for wildlife but also for military aviation - particularly fast jets. I can really relate to the auto focus issues that you have highlighted. The number of shots that I find out of focus when I get back to my computer can be really frustrating. However, when I do get shots that are in focus, they are pin sharp. I have just ordered the dock to see if I can improve the situation.

[@Duade]

Matt, sounds like tough conditions that is for sure. Good luck with it, Cheers, Duade

[@TieitAndFlyit]

Did it improve?

[@ptdphotos]

Excellent walk through/review as always. For context I photograph wildlife and warbirds (prop airplanes) I owned this lens for 3 years upgrading from the Canon 100-400 Mark 1. I think I put about 600k photos thorough it on my old 7D2 - and still recommend this to others when they are looking for that win for their money. Hands down I think this is a great lens for those stepping into wildlife and are budget conscious. What I can say is if you are one that can stretch the budget, upgrading to the Sport version of this focal length, or even the 60-600 that I upgraded to, you are in a higher performance and capability bracket for the money. Same f/6.3 on the long end, but the 60-150 focal length range is a game changer for a single lens. You can even pull some landscape shots off with it if you are in a pinch. It is about 2x the cost, but for what it is still a very positive price point with what I feel more than twice the performance.

[@Duade]

and thanks for sharing your experience, it sounds like it is a real winner for people starting out. Glad to hear you are enjoying the 60-600. Cheers, Duade

[@johndecriscio9586]

I bought this lens four years ago to take with me on a safari in Tanzania. I am far from an accomplished photographer, but highly believe in take a lot of pictures, and hopefully some of them come out great. I got some great photos, well great for me, so I am super happy I bought it. I would have been very disappointed with my photos if I did not have this lens with me.

[@Duade]

John, thanks for sharing your experience with the lens, and it is great you took many wonderful shots which is great. Cheers, Duade

[@bruceholmes8010]

I own this Sigma 150-600mm Lens now for over a year and agree on the focus pulsating is real on mine also and can be aggravating. That being said, I use it on a Canon 6 D primarily and also use it on an EOS Rebel SL2 at times. This was a great video and one that really showed the highs lows of this lens. I wanted to get into bird photography as the reason I bought this lens and its price point was very agreeable. I wanted to improve my picture taking and once I feel I have improved (I am my worst critic) I might move to the Mirrorless Camera R5/R6. I really do like the lens and it is light enough to not always need a tripod. Fits in my Camera Backpack good enough also. The picture quality I think is very good - I will say at full 600 length, the focus sometimes is an issue so I have dial down to say 590 or 580 - or could be user issue. Thank you so very much for providing this video and all the links.

[@Duade]

Bruce, thanks for sharing your real world experience, it is very helpful to others. Great to hear it is allowing you to enjoy bird photography. Cheers, Duade

[@MrWDCash]

Duade, Nicely done. Thanks for all the work that went into this. The Cockatoo with the dark background is wonderful. Merry Christmas Bill

[@Duade]

Bill, thanks for the feedback, yes, the Cockatoo is a highlight for sure. Cheers, Duade

[@jamesconibear2913]

Excellent video Duade. It's helped me make my mind up about this lens, so thank you! I often struggle getting close enough to skittish small birds - particularly Kingfisher and Bullfinch here in the UK - with my 70-300, so this should help me immensely. Looking forward to using it on my 90D.

[@Duade]

James, it will be amazing going from your 300 to the 600, good luck with it. Cheers, Duade

[@iancarroll3918]

I agree, here in the UK my 75-300 is just not close enough and have felt down about my photos, not being able to get close to the subject. Think I will splash out and get the Sigma 100-600. wish me luck.

[@katarzynaa2926]

This review helped me choose my lens. The best I've ever watched. I am just starting my adventure with photography. Great examples and clear information. Thank you!

[@Duade]

Thanks Katarzyna, it is my pleasure, be sure to watch this video on settings if you get a mirrorless camera, kzbin.info/www/bejne/omi3dqhnicyka6s Cheers, Duade

[@comeraczy2483]

Thanks a lot for making such a comprehensive review. I've used this excellent lens for over 3 years, both with a Canon rebel T7i and a Canon 5D IV. It is a very versatile lens and even thought I use it mostly for wildlife, it is a reasonable choice for easy astrophotography targets (e.g. Orion Nebula, Andromeda, Neowise, etc.), it is great for some landscape and even portrait. There are a few additional things that I find important enough to be worth mentioning. First, at close distance, it is definitely not 600mm and for small bird close-ups a short extension tube does go a long way in getting back to the expected magnification (not too much otherwise the autofocus is quickly limited to LiveView only). Then, the autofocus is really borderline for BIF. It can work with profile shots of larger, slower birds, but with faster birds, head-on shots will frequently fail because the AF is too slow closing in and eventually will find something more contrasty in the background. Finally, as this is supposed to be a camera for wildlife, chances are that it will get exposed to sand, dust, dirt and wet weather and this is something that might become a problem because this lens is really not dust & weather sealed. With the accumulation of dust, the autofocus on my lens has become really temperamental and I can't use it at all at altitude (over 3000m/10000ft).

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience, it is very helpful, yes, I should have mentioned the weather sealing etc. Cheers, Duade

[@281Boss]

I just got this lens yesterday (4/30/2022) for use with my Nikon D7500. I have the Sigma 100-400C that I've been lugging around on wildlife hikes. While wonderfully light, the reach just isn't there for small birds beyond 30ft. My Nikon 200-500 lens is fantastic but heavy--it's not something I'd walk with in hand. I watched your video and talked to some bird club folks with the lens, and gave it a shot. I spent just two hours in the field this morning and can attest it's definitely capable of taking quality song bird photos at a distance. Like you said, the AF hunts a bit and I had to quickly spin the focus ring manually a few times to get my shot. I'm going to test the AF using some recently acquired calibration software but I have a feeling it will be dead on. While light enough to carry carefully, I bought an inexpensive Nicama chest harness and found it distributed the weight comfortably. Tomorrow morning I'm going on a long hike along a lake and need to try out the AF for BIF. Anyhow, I've subscribed so I'll go through your videos over time. Thanks Duade, this was a really nice overview of your experience with the lens!

[@Duade]

John, congrats on the lens, it is very good for birding, if the light allows try to stop down to f8 when at 600mm as this will often help with sharpness. Cheers, Duade

[@chrissaunders2246]

I've had the lens for two years now and I find it amazing..,I use it on a D500, owing to the lack of light here in the UK I find myself consistently using it at ISO 3200,that is my ceiling I won't go higher,and people cannot believe it, the photos are consistently sharp, I had an accident with it a year ago and had to send it off to Sigma,when it came back ,they had calibrated it and it was even sharper,! it doesn't like low contrast and will hunt a bit and also in certain low light situations. But all in all a great lens, I have neck problems and mostly use it on a Gimblehead on a tripod , and this gives it the advantage,no camera shake ever, I consistently shoot at f6.3, even when I don't have to..no problems, if you pull the lens back from the long end it goes sharper still. Hope this helps, Chris.

[@Duade]

Chris, thanks for sharing your experience and it confirms my findings. It is also interesting how correct calibration can make all the difference. Thanks for sharing, Cheers, Duade

[@ronwilson9855]

Just taken delivery of the Sigma 150 600, your video was the decider, looking forward to getting out with it.

[@Duade]

Ron, great to hear, good luck with it in the field. Cheers, Duade

[@andyrob64]

Great video Duade, I have had my 150-600 for around 18 months and pair it with my 7D mk2, as you say autofocus can be a bit slow especially in low light but that is easily outweighed by the fact it is so light as I very rarely use any support as I prefer going out lightweight!

[@Duade]

Andy, that is great to hear, that does make for a great kit. Cheers, Duade

[@arielkraus7958]

Thanks for the review! I just bought a Sigma 150-600mm for my 90D and came here looking for answers for my AF issues straight out of the box. Thanks again! I hope updating the firmware solves my issues!

[@Duade]

My pleasure Ariel, it is a great lens but the AF can be a bit hit and miss at times. Take lots of shots in bursts and constantly focus on the subject and you should increase your keepers. Make sure your SS is high enough, ideally over 1/400 if you have the light. Good luck with it, Cheers, Duade

[@arielkraus7958]

@@Duade update: spoke with Sigma, and somehow they believe a sensor was damaged in shipping. So fingers crossed a replacement will be much better!

[@bazsan10]

I have had this lens in the nikon mount for just over 2 years. I use it on my D500 mostly. I noticed some things in common with what you found. First I haven't had to calibrate it at all it worked great straight out the box. Image quality is great and mine is just as sharp at 600mm. I to have tried a 1.4x tele and while it worked I was not a fan it seemed to lack clarity or crispness to the image when compared to images with out a teleconvertor. I have also used Nikons 200-500 and I prefer the Sigma 150-600mm c focus is about the same that is to say I didn't notice any difference in speed between them. I have a extra 100mm to play with and it's just as sharp if not a tad sharper at least with my copy. For value I don't think it can be beaten its the cheapest option for a 600mm. I have managed to get great results with birds in flight and even Dragonflies inflight with this lens love it. Lastly if I need more reach instead of a teleconvertor I stick a m4/3 adapter on it and use my Panosonic GX9 it looks absolutely ridiculous but it gets the job done lol

[@Duade]

Barry, thanks for sharing your experience, sounds like you have been very happy with the lens and nice to hear the comparison with the Nikon 200-500. Cheers, Duade

[@mountys_photoadventure]

Thank you Duade for this excellent review. I bought the 150-600 last year and absolutely love it. I mainly use it for wildlife and birds. I use it on a Canon 650d and a 200d. Greetings from Germany Mounty

[@Duade]

Mounty, great to hear the lens is working well for you, Cheers, Duade

[@Hummingbirder1]

Ha! Merry Xmas!! I was really waiting for this present to land in my suggested feed today, and it did. And it's sooo long, what a good time I'll have with this, Duade. (haven't started watching yet, got to fix brunch for me and my parrotlets first) Edit: Back from my forest bird-feeding station, where I brushed snow and filled up the feeders before nightfall, then back to my warm appartment for some quality video-watching time. Since I've never used this lens I have nothing useful to add.

[@Duade]

Yes, it was a long one, took a lot longer than I anticipated but I had so many photos to share. I'm glad you enjoyed it. Cheers, Duade

[@laszlobacs9347]

Great review on this sigma lens. I own one of these and I agree with everything you mentioned in this video including the pulsing issue in continuous AF mode. For the price is a great choice to have that reach. I also owned the canon 100 to 400 version 2 and yes it is a wonderful lens. I still have the canon 400f5.6 prime which I reach for when I just want to go light and have some fun. I'm a huge fan of the channel and I would like to find out more about the fujifilm xh2s with the fx 150 to 600mm if you could make a video that would be great. Cheers from Canada

[@Duade]

Thanks Laszlo, sounds like we have used very similar lenses. I will try to get the Fuji, Cheers, Duade

[@Wolf-6567]

Hello Duade, this is one of the best lens reviews I've seen. I will be buying this lens. Thank you for taking so much time and effort to really go through what this lens can do, and how to get the best out of it. Amazing bird shots, after watching a lot of your videos I can say I have really learnt so much- so thank you. Hand holding suggestion follows hopefully useful. On the subject of hand holding a heavy camera and longer lens, a technique I use follows, try it out and with a little practice see if it works for you. I keep my left elbow real close to my left hip, locked in. Feet set shoulder width apart. My left hand, I point my index finger forward towards the front of the lens, rest the lens on my hand but at the joint of the wrist, my left fingers gently wrap around the lens. Right hand grips but not too tight, its a suppport. I lock my right elbow into my right hip. To rotate I twist my hips. My body sort of sits almost 45 degrees to the subject, natural and not a forced position. This stance is used in rifle shooting. I am a marksman from a younger day, so adapted from that, at longer zooms, slow breathing down also helps with really locking onto a subject. A solid stance, but not over gripping, and try to really avoid fingers in the left hand supporting any weight, use the wrist joint at the point where the palm meets the wrist in that V shape you create as you wrap the thumb around. I keep my left elbow to a max of about 45 degrees, when the stance is correct you'll feel it is right and easy to maintain. Then when the stance is right, keep the stance and just drop the camera into your hands. Legs and body makes a solid, but not rigid tripod. Try and relax into it, but not floppy. If this becomes a consistant standing pose, it will become easy to maintain, and more natural. My Canon 70-300 ISL USM can get a bit heavy after a while haha. Great video, love your content and check out the stance see if its any use. Good luck and thank you again. :)

[@Duade]

Thanks Wolf for such a detailed explanation on hand holding, sounds like a good pose for sure, I will try next time. Cheers, Duade

[@nphotodotorg2690]

Great job Duade! You did such an awesome job with this video! I do have this lens and still use it regularly, but I am saving up for the Sony 200-600mm. I use the Sigma with the Canon 80D and Sony a6100. I get better results with the Sony for whatever reason. I use them on a monopod, stabilization always on.

[@liting3944]

Hi, May l learn your EF to FE adopter for Sony? Thanks!

[@nphotodotorg2690]

@@liting3944 I use Sigma MC-11, Canon mount. Make sure to get the one that fits your lens mount. For example, If your lens is the Canon mount, make sure to get that one.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing, it appears that mirrorless bodies do deliver sharper shots than DSLR, I suspect this is to do with calibration issues on DSLR and the AF systems. Good luck saving for the 200-600, you will love that lens. Cheers, Duade

[@donaldjones2106]

Great review. I check out this lens and found the 150-600 mm worked great. My first time with it got me sharp pictures. Love the 500-600 range. I was hand holding it. I even got one for a friend of mine. I am going out next week to shoot birds and I am sure the reach will be helpful.

[@Duade]

Great to hear Donald, happy birding, Cheers, Duade

[@somewhatfunny]

Excellent assessment of this lens' strengths and weaknesss. I have been using it for 6 years, with a Canon 60D and an 80D. Sharp results are possible, but low light or rapidly moving subjects such as flight shots are challenging for consistently accurate autofocus. I also stop down to f7.1 when lighting is good, but I have periodically gotten sharp results at f6.3. My Canon 300mm f4, even with a 1.4 extender is better for flight shots.

[@Duade]

Thanks Ronald, I appreciate you sharing your experience, I agree with what you have said. Cheers, Duade

[@happynjoyousnfree]

I just bought this lens for $749 from B&H! I haven't started to use it (feeling very intimidated as it's my first heavy lens) but I'm excited to start! I have a Nikon D3300. Thanks so much for all of your informative videos!

[@jcphenix1]

That's a lot of work! One of the best review ever, Bravo! I'm very pleased with the lens on an EM1.2 after recent tests 1.200 mm handheld, pro capture, 18fps, good IQ, fast AF (better than 400/5.6L on Olympus), single AF only but as it is fast and reliable you can play around with it : BIF is doable. And a lot of fun. Not too Frankenstein on the semi-dwarf Olympus, the lens is (somewhat) light and compact (@150 mm). I'm considering a speed-booster (105-425 mm f3.5-4.5). It won't replace my main gear (Nikon), but is ready to go on a R5 (perhaps?) despite the unfortunate pulsing issue Merry Xmas !

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing how you use the lens, great to hear you enjoyed it. Cheers, Duade

[@DWIngham]

I have a SIGMA 150-600 that I use with a NIKON D7500 and come to really like the lens. I bought it on a recommendation from a friend and didn't put much research into it but luckily I have found it to work for me. For a 40+ minute video I was fairly enthralled and found the presentation informative as well as entertaining, very well done. Good catch on the AF/Pulsing issue, luckily my camera doesn't have the problem since no Eye Focusing available. However the simple workaround should be very helpful the those with those systems. I am a little jealous of your location for wildlife photography specifically with the varied types of bird life. Australia is on the bucket list. In the American Northwest the wild life is interesting, just not a colorful. Count me as a new subscriber.

[@Duade]

Welcome to the channel and thanks for sharing your experience, great to hear it is working well for you. Yes, we are very lucky down here. Cheers, Duade

[@A3Kr0n]

When I was a kid we didn't get 10,000 pictures, we got something like 36 shots on a roll and you made every shot count (hopefully).

[@Duade]

Yes, we have come a long way, I remember sending off a roll of 24 photos and waiting a week for them to come back. Cheers, Duade

[@__-bk6mm]

Duade that Spinebill photo is stunning! I really hope you have that on the wall at home it's a beautiful shot!

[@Duade]

Thank you, it was a real highlight that is for sure, Cheers ,Duade

[@TheBetonbob]

Im still a beginner in Wildlife photography and i bought this lens and adapted it to my lumix g9. I'm quite pleased with the pictures i get from that combo. Even the animalrecognition works. I had the Leica 100-400 before and the iq was not better than with the Sigma. For me this lens ist the perfect mix of price, reach and IQ.

[@liting3944]

Hi, May I learn your lens mount of FF and adopter to M43? Thanks!

[@TheBetonbob]

@@liting3944 I'm using the viltrox ef-m1 and the ef-m2. My Lens has a Canon EF-mount. The ef-m2 ist a 0.71 speedbooster, it gives me a better f-stop at the expense of more glass in the way and a shorter reach.

[@Duade]

and thanks for sharing how you use the lens. Cheers, Duade

[@nathanwatsonphotography]

Stunning Spinebill image and an excellent review. The Sigma contemporary or sports versions of this lens represent great value for a 600mm and take some great images.

[@Duade]

Nathan, thanks for the feedback, the Spinebill was a highlight, Cheers, Duade

[@TsvetanVR]

Thank you for the in-depth review and the video production quality! As someone getting back into photography and still owning my good old Canon 60D, I greatly appreciate the fact that you took the time to show what this lens can do not just with the latest and greatest but with both the 40D and the 90D! I'm happy to see that it's totally feasible to stay with the now old school DSLR tech, get the lens and upgrade the body down the road. Maybe just swap the 60D for a used 80D with minimal investment. That 150-600mm lens will definitely blow me away, both in terms of reach and quality, as I'm currently used to my budget, ancient Sigma 70-300 APO DG. Cheers from Bulgaria! Needless to say, you gained a sub!

[@Duade]

Thanks for taking the time to comment, yes, it is one of the best valued lenses on the market. Cheers, Duade

[@TsvetanVR]

@@Duade You are most welcome! It's incredibly hard to find quality, relevant wildlife content. Glad I found your channel as I only had Simon d'Entremont until now. Too bad wildlife here is not as diverse and colourful but I know there are a few eagles and vultures as well as wild horses up in my local mountains. Can't wait to get these stitches removed so I can go out and seek them. I hate motorcycle crashes. Looking at the current Canon mirrorless bodies I can't help but feel that most of them would be a step down from what I'm used to in terms of build quality, ergonomics, weather sealing and the second display on top. Unless I go for something several times more expensive than what I paid for my 60D when it came out years ago. And as great as their low-light and focusing capabilities are, many of them also seem slower than an 80/90D and with terrible battery life. Apart from the R5 which is mindbogglingly expensive for a hobbyist.

[@abhinavrana2663]

I am a casual photographer/hobbyist. I bought this lens as a beginner with no clear purpose and just for the reach. once I learned more about photography, I can say this lens is worth every penny. it is sometime slow and misses focus but being a third party lens and one of the cheapest in the category, that is acceptable. overall its great for the price.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience, I totally agree, Cheers, Duade

[@parksnewbornportraiture4989]

I am going to be testing this lens from a friend shortly. Your video was hugely informative, though. I was debating between this and the 800 RF and I know you said you’d probably pick the latter, but honestly, the focus pulsing is something I have already encountered with my older 300 f/4L and - like you - have been able to account for that. I really appreciate how thorough you were in your review. Thank you for taking the time to do this!

[@danielm1dnighthunt3r87]

I have this lens now, your review is one of the view which really helped me make a choice on camera vs lens upgrade. So happy I chose the lens

[@Duade]

That is great to hear Daniel, I am happy to hear it is working well for you. Cheers, Duade

[@alienxyt]

I gave you a thumbs-up for showing your edits versus the original shot. And you can even see the crops too. Well done!!

[@Duade]

Thanks for the thumbs up, I find the crop and raw are a good learning tool to show how I edit my shots. Cheers, Duade

[@edgaralegre9725]

Your Review of this lens is Spot On. I rented this lens to see how it compares with the Canon 400 5.6 L and i had the same experience. The autofocus is a little slow and it hunts once in a while compared to the Canon which is quick. The other thing i didn't liked is the Focus Limiter, i kept switching it and kept forgetting to switch back. So, my Advice is for those trying to decide which lens to get, I'd defintely recommend the Canon 400. 5.6 over the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary.

[@edgaralegre9725]

In Addition, it's frustrating when you miss a lot of shots because the lens isn't focusing quick enough so i'd rather have smaller images but tack sharp than missed shots and i do agree with you that 100% of errors comes from the photographer & not the lens.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience, I agree the 400 5.6 is such a light fast lens it makes other lenses seem slow. Great to hear you are enjoying it. Cheers, Duade

[@aeroptical]

Fantastic in-depth review Duade. Merry Christmas.

[@Duade]

Thank you, I am glad you enjoyed it. Cheers, Duade

[@marianhamster]

Great review! I actually got the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary after watching your video and I am really happy with it so far after a faw weeks of using it 🙂

[@Duade]

That is great to hear, thanks for giving me the feedback, Cheers, Duade

[@StephenJStephen_Photography]

Very informative and thorough video Duade as always. I bought the Sigma 50-500 non-IS used in 2005. I regularly shot with it regularly for 14 years until I dropped it in the Galápagos in 2019. The price, zoom capabilities and sharpness, at least for the one that I owned, offered great value. IMHO. I do own the Canon 500mm F4 & 100-400mm II but I will miss my old Sigma.

[@Duade]

Stephen, thanks for sharing, sorry to hear about the lens, I dropped my camera once into saltwater, it didn't survive. Great to hear you have some nice Canon lenses there. Cheers, Duade

[@saipraneethm5525]

I was looking for best and clear review of this sigma lens in KZbin I have so much questions in my mind after seeing your review video now I'm satisfied and my all questions cleared thanks buddy for making a good review on this lens now I have only have to do is try to buy this lens Good day😊 love from India🇮🇳

[@Duade]

It is my pleasure, good luck getting the lens. Cheers, Duade

[@ThatOneSceneDude]

This lens is a game changer for wildlife photography. I had a 200mm for 9 years before I got this sigma lens. I recommend this to anyone wanting to do wildlife photography.

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing your experience, sounds like you enjoy it. Cheers, Duade

[@simeonandrews8223]

I have this lens, got it about a year ago as my wife and I got into bird photography. My wife uses a 90D and a Canon 100-400 Mark II, and I don't think I could convince her to change. She's reasonably strong, but the lightness of the Canon, and its sharp consistent pictures are not something she would trade for the extra 200mm reach. I shoot on a Canon R6, and whenever I can get away with it, I use my 600mm f11 lens, because it is so light and easy to use. When going at dawn or dusk, I'll usually take the Sigma 150-600, and it behaves well and of course gives me a lot more light in these low-light scenarios. But I usually pack along the 600mm f11 and swap out as soon as it gets light enough. The image quality is comparable, and after an hour of walking and shooting with the Sigma, by arms are tired. Probably wouldn't be an issue if I used a tripod, but that's not how I usually go birding. There are a few occasions where it would be nice to have the zoom range of the Sigma instead of being stuck at 600mm for the 600/f11, but even when I'm shooting with the Sigma, 95%+ of my shots are at 600mm. I never really noticed the focus hunting you mention, but I usually put it down to me not holding the lens steady enough due to weight; now I'm curious to investigate.

[@Duade]

Simeon, thanks for sharing your experience and that real world info is very helpful. The weight is an issue for many and those RF lenses are so light, as is the RF100-500, EF100-400. I am just happy we have these choices as consumers. Cheers, Duade

[@roybarnes-thewildlifeman1855]

Many years ago considered both the Tamron and Sigma lenses and went with the Sigma variant because it included a neat case and other additions. I've shot thousands of images with this lens and have always found it remarkable. Reasonably priced., so versatile, and delivering such great results, this lens is a wonderful investment for the wildlife photographer.

[@lachlangraham1062]

Epic piece of work! Great video, this lens is on my short list if my present Sigma 150-500 dies. Have a great Xmas.

[@Duade]

Lachlan, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade

[@Jennyjk2016]

I'm a new photographer, and I just bought this as my first wildlife lens. I'm no professional, but this has the perfect reach for me as a beginner. I'm really happy with it

[@Duade]

Great to hear!

[@deanroslynmengel5575]

Merry Christmas Duade - another great video.

[@Duade]

Thanks mate, hope you had a great day yesterday and got some camera related presents. Cheers, Duade

[@Lunafilms12]

I have this lens and paired it with my R5 and R6 and i have been very impressed with the performance of this lens. I shot lots of bears , Moose and bison at Yellowstone last year and was very impressed .

[@Duade]

Jose, that is great to hear, thanks for sharing, Cheers, Duade

[@andygray7776]

Great video, thanks Duade. Really helpful. I think that the photo you took of the white bird against the black background coming into land. is fantastic. Well done! Ps. Hope you are fully recovered from your recent Op.

[@trevor9934]

As always, I am a fan of your no-nonsense, highly objective and professional presentations. I have the Canon EF 100-400 MkII and the RF 100-500 lenses, and they are both awesome lenses, but I must admit that the Sigma 150-600 is one of my favourite units and gets used a lot. I would be really interested in a review by you of the other super great Sigma lens: the Sigma 60-600s lens - more expensive and much heavier, but a great lens when you want to take only one lens and your may have to shoot across a wide focal range! If I was in Oz, I'd lend you mine but I'm in NZ! As to the 90D, I was disappointed that it did not inherit the much better focusing system of the 7DII, it would really have improved that body.

[@Duade]

Thanks Trevor, it is my pleasure, I might try and get hold of that lens to test at some stage. Yes, the 90D should have got the 7D2 AF. Cheers, Duade

[@marcymaurer4040]

Hello from Idaho. Thank you so much for posting this very informational video!! I have this lens on my radar and have been searching about how compatible it is with the 90D. You have convinced me that it will be a great addition to my camera bag. Your photos are wonderful and enjoy viewing your videos

[@Duade]

Marcy, thank you for such nice feedback, it makes me happy to hear the video is helpful for those looking at the lens. Good luck with it and I hope you capture many beautiful shots. Cheers, Duade

[@hugomouteira7015]

Great review Duade. You are the best wildlife photographer on youtube! Cheers from Portugal!

[@Duade]

Hugo, thank you for the kind feedback, I appreciate it. Cheers, Duade

[@hugomouteira7015]

@@Duade I also have a question. Does the R6 record in 1080p clog at 10 bit or you need to record in 4k for that 10bit juice? I have a small budget, but I would love to get the R6 somehow, because I would like to get at least 12fps and good video quality and double cardcslots, just for safety, so the eos R is a no-no, I guess ;(

[@trevor9934]

Hi Duade et al: I hope you are all safe and well and having a good holiday season. I live in NZ and we've just come out of about 15 weeks of lockdown, so I've been a bit low on imagery lately. Still, I have had the 150-600c and its mate the 60-600s from Sigma for a couple of years and love both of them. Just to give you context: I shoot with both DSLRs (5DIII, IV, DsR, 60, 80D, 90D)and MILCs (R5 and R6), and with them I have the EF 100-400MkII, and RF 100-500 lenses to compare to the Sigma units. I have to say that the conditions under which I shoot are different from Duade's because the birds in my area are usually in deep, thick bush, with the exception of the sea birds: Gannets in particular. Post lockdown, I have made a few trips out and even gone to the zoo - just for a change - and taken the Sigma with me. To me, the most challenging combination is with it on the 52MP EOS 5DsR, hand-held: a camera that will show any flaw in technology or technique. I really like the Sigma 150-600c, and find it performs to MY needs for the output I want. I think a lot depends on what you are going to produce. It demands a lot less performance to create images for social media and digital display than for hi-resolution Fine Art images. In that respect the lens is able to bridge both realms to a degree. Certainly, value for money, it is hard to beat and I shall be keeping mine and using it for the foreseeable future!

[@Duade]

Trevor, thanks for sharing your experience, sounds like you have plenty of gear for the right scenario. Its great to hear you have been able to get out and about again. I hope to get back to NZ next year Covid permitting. I really want to do the Kaikoura Pelagic. Cheers, Duade

[@chrisgrylls9132]

A top notch video Duade, and a real down to earth assessment of the lens. I don't have any experience with the lens and contemplated buying it at one stage, but opted to make do with my Canon 100-400 Mk. II on my 90D for the moment. I do own a Sigma 170-500mm which I have had for many years, which gives acceptable images, but is no comparison to this lens.

[@Duade]

Chris, thanks for the feedback, the 100-400 really is a fantastic lens and the IS and AF are very good. Cheers, Duade

[@andreleroux7484]

From South Africa, where "wildlife" really has meaning, this lens is a must. Any other 600mm is far too unwieldy when one has to move fast, IQ is a bit of a compromise but not much. I permanently use Sigma on a 90D. I also own the Canon 100-400ii with the 5Div and have worked out ways to use the two bodies/lens combos in tandem as circumstances and scenes can change quickly in the African bush with our abundance of wild animals and birds in action. Both combos have pride of place on the car seat next to me. In hides, and the like, I set both combos up and use them as necessary. I agree IQ with the Sigma is a bit of a compromise compared to the 100-400ii but not much. Getting the shot is what matters.

[@Duade]

André, thanks for sharing your experience, sounds like you get the best out of both kits. Good to have the reach of the 600mm when needed and the wider FF option. Cheers, Duade

[@fenraven]

I just photographed a snowy egret, which is blazingly white. I adjusted for that by lowering the exposure to prevent blowing it out, and the background was darker. I loved the effect. It framed the snowy egret beautifully and details were clear. I prefer the background to be darker, so the subject is the focus, and I process for that effect if it doesn't happen naturally. I've been using the Sigma C 600 for a couple years now.

[@Duade]

Theo, sounds like a great shot, thanks for sharing, Cheers, Duade