Sigma 35mm F2 DN Definitive Review | 4K

[@DannyChau7]

Dustin, you are probably one of the best photo reviewer on KZbin, thank you. I think Sigma got themselves a cult following with this DN series, I'm already in love with the 45mm f2.8, super happy with the quality it offers without breaking the bank and the built is absolutely fantastic.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Danny - I do think it is smart of them to tap into the demographic of those who love beautifully made things

[@chesslover8829]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I concur with Danny: you are one of the very best camera and lens reviewers on KZbin! The other reviewer I like is Christopher Frost from the U.K.

[@MrBraveTurtle]

I went to bed yesterday wishing you will review this lens. Thank you sir!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I guess wishes do come true ;)

[@joe2snj]

Been waiting for your review even more than the official announcement!! ☺️

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hope you enjoyed it!

[@enrico.ferraro]

Calm, kind, professional and easy to understand. Glad to have subscribed. Also, loving the jacket. I'm hoping the lens will soon be available here in Europe, the build quality and tactile feedback on the lens really caters to me. Stay safe during Christmas!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think a lot of people will really like this lens.

[@stevenec3207]

Dustin, you are the Fred Rogers of lens reviews. So good

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@networm64]

Wow sigma is doing a great job indeed! Can't wait for your review of other 2 lens in the trio! And a big thumbs up for zooming in more while showing photos...We all wachting on our phones most of the time so that would be a big leap in showing the details👍👌

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you enjoyed it.

[@breathoffreshair245]

So I was looking for a good sigma 35mm F2 review (planning on maybe picking one up in the future), and I was TOTALLY SHOCKED to see a picture of the city hall, and a photo from downtown. Did a little more research on you and realized we're from the same city (what a small world?) I'll definitely have to come and say hi if I ever see you out shooting! Got a sub from me.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't run into many photographers in the Pembroke community, for sure.

[@DA-yd2ny]

Great review, as usual. I am amazed at the amount of smaller yet capable lenses for mirrorless cameras being released in 2020 alone. Is lens technology catching up with the advantage that system has to offer over the DSLR system?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It could be. I counted more than 12 35mm lenses for Sony FE.

[@beerequalsheaven]

The 35mm focal length is shaping up nicely indeed what with the Sony 1.8 and the Sigma Arts 1.2/1.4....and I hear in the passing wind a Sony 35mm 1.4 GM is going to drop in 21!! on a side note I'm looking forward to your 65mm F2 feature and how it may compare, to say, the voigtlander (to which I own). However I really do need to stop watching your reviews Dustin or find myself spending Christmas alone! (50mm 1.4 planar is still a sore subject two months on!) hehe. Take care and wishing you and your family a wonderful Christmas mate :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

LOL - you may not want to watch the 65mm review, then...

[@gitithadani]

Its a very intelligent series of lenses too - combined with the mechanical precision of a Voigtlander, zeiss etc but in a very aesthetic design incorporating the best of the mechanical film era and the modern mirrorless digital. The optics too seems to have a lot of character. Its also interesting that the series has a 65mm - waiting to see your review of it & how you see it vis a vis the voigtlander. Thanks for giving us a taste of the snow through the window of this lens!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi GIti, that seems to be an intelligent take on these lenses. I'm working on the 65mm review right now.

[@gitithadani]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Looking forward to it. BTW the jacket has style - suiits you!

[@dhj013]

Fantastic review as always. I can see this lens going really well with a7c for fun and compact setup.

[@johnstinchcombe1811]

I totally agree, adding one of these beauties to a Sony a7c would give it that “Leica rangefinder vibe” for sure! Sigma’s a smart company!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is!

[@Mauroplcr]

Nice review Dustin and very detailed !

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@ianbrown704]

As always, great review. Thinking of buying this when the "L Mount" is launched this month in the UK. Nice coat by the way! Happy New Year - 100k subs very soon

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks...and yes, I'm definitely looking forward to passing that 100K benchmark.

[@MarkusSenior]

Great review Dustin. Seems like a nice lens. Sad that the Tamron 35 is so much out of whack with the autofocus performance, otherwise it would have been interesting to also compare the Sigma to that lens. Cheers from LA and enjoy the snow.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Agreed. Unfortunately I've already relegated the Tamron FE primes to the back of my mind, as I just don't find the AF performance competitive even though they are good optically. I think that was a big misstep by Tamron, particularly when the RXD motors are so good.

[@MarkusSenior]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks for your response :-)

[@The_Divine_Mine]

Hi Dustin, A thorough review as always. I’m looking to get a 35mm prime for documenting daily family life (candid moments with young kids etc.), family gatherings and the rest. I was going to get a Fuji X100V but have instead decided to add a light 35mm prime to my collection. I bought a Sony A7IV late last year and got a 50mm 1.2 GM based on your recommendation, and have been extremely pleased with it. But I find it a little heavy and bulky for everyday use, and 50mm somewhat tight for indoor photography. I’m deciding between this Sigma f2, Sony 1.8 and Sony 1.4 GM and have watched your reviews. The Sigma and Sony 1.8 are similarly priced here in Australia and the 1.4 GM costs twice as much. I know you really like the 1.4 GM and highly recommend it. I’m not a professional and would be willing to spend the money if it’s really worth it. My main requirement is a really great lens but more importantly, a lighter/less bulkier overall setup so it doesn’t feel like a chore to capture small daily moments (hence my initial decision to get a Fuji). I’d really appreciate your advice as it’ll greatly help me with my final decision. Thank you kindly!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The good news is that all of these are really great lenses. We are spoiled for choice. Just go for the one that suits your needs and budget - I'm convinced you will enjoy any of them.

[@The_Divine_Mine]

Thank you Dustin although you haven’t made it any easier 😀 I’ve just watched your Samyang 35mm 1.8 review so now that has come into the mix as well. I may go for the smaller footprint so if you were to choose between the Sony 1.8, Sigma 2.0 and Samyang 1.8, what would you personally go for in order of your preference i.e. first, second and third? Thanks again!

[@ThatComicsDad]

Thanks for the detailed video Dustin! Do you think the extra cost is worth it over the Samyang 1.8?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That depends on your priorities. The Sigma does have a few advantages in build and a bit of sharpness, but its not night and day better.

[@Fotogoscar]

I love the build quality. It resembles some of the vintage ones. I currently have the Sony Zeiss 35mm f2.8. Wondering if I should sell it for this one. Love the look. Not worried about its performance, sigma produces high quality.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think the Sigma is an upgrade, for sure.

[@Fotogoscar]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you Dustin. I respect your reviews.

[@jorgemartinyamamotosuda3232]

Thank you for your comprehensive review. At the end of the video you mentioned that the reviewed lens is like a 35 loxia with auto-focus. Does the Sigma have the same or near micro-contrast, 3D, color rendering; Zeiss pop? If I prefer these characteristics in a lens, should I go for Loxia, or the Sigma delivers near Loxia rendering?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't think the optics are as special, though the Sigma is definitely sharper at wide apertures. The construction and the general feel of the lens is similar, though.

[@albertogvphoto]

I loved Dustin , Thanks for this review I just ordered my 35mm 2.0 from Sigma , Great

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy it

[@romankampa6212]

Thanks for the detailed/great review and every single answer: really great work (as always). Love the 35 art at my 6d but most the time it was too heavy for my. I switched to fuji and really like/love the system.... but sometimes i miss a sigma-lens. Which body would you prefer for this? Maybe a SL, a S5 or a 7c?! Too many choices in these times 😅

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

A 7C is a nice fit, for sure.

[@romankampa6212]

Dustin Abbott thank you very much!

[@DavidStella]

Like the bokeh on the clips where you're outdoors. Which lens are you using to record that?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm actually using the Sigma 65mm F2: it's a great video lens.

[@DavidStella]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I'm impressed by it. Thanks!

[@stro_photography]

Thanks again !! Especially the language and choice of words, which surely comes from your work as a pastor, is very pleasant ! especially for a foreign guest (German) :-)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you, Steffen. I've heard similar things many times from those who first language is not English.

[@orhansimsek-hh]

After I bought the sigma 85mm dg dn, I wanted sigma to build a small 35mm for sony, but now I have a small sony 35mm 1.8. I am happy though. Many thanks for video. Orhan

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Sony is a nice little lens, too.

[@ZvonimirGrubisic79]

Hi Dustin. Thank you for the review. If we consider just picture quality, would you prefer this sigma or Loxia 35mm f2?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would say the Loxia probably still has slightly nicer bokeh and color (Loxia strengths), but the Sigma wins in just about every other category.

[@muhammadomerjan163]

You've been my go-to for lens reviews ever since I moved to Sony, so thanks for all that you do Dustin! I'm considering this or the Samyang 35 1.8. My requirements are good background blur, good lowlight video performance and good lowlight video AF performance. Which one do you suggest Dustin? I already have a Tamron 28-75 2.8 so is the difference between f2.8 and f2 siginificant enough or not?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would lean towards the Sigma. IT's a little more consistent optically and has the nicer build.

[@yurious02]

Thank you for the extensive review! Purchased using your B&H referral link.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hope you enjoy it!

[@jonoy4375]

Hi Dustin, what lens did you use to shot this self film outdoors? Looks great, crispy and clear. Is or Tamron 2875? I thought it would be a prime 85?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I used the 65mm F2 DN from Sigma.

[@ansontang9421]

Thumbs up. If I have a tight budget for only one daily use len, for portraits, landscaping and family gathering photos, Sony 35 f1.8, Samyang 35 f1.8 and Sigma 35 f2, which one is more recommendable?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think I liked the rendering from the Sigma best.

[@rommelsedano7739]

Love the tactile feel of sigma lenses. Wish they made some for Fuji. Great review and maybe better than my Batis 40.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's a tough call. The Batis 40 is a nice lens.

[@robertcudlipp3426]

Batis, fine, but what about the price pain of the Batis?

[@johnnytwo-shoes9798]

Thank you for another the excellent review. I'm tossing up between the Tamron 35mm f2.8 and this sigma. In terms of the sigmas sharpness at f2 and f2.8 (more so at 2.8 for equivalence) against the Tamron at f2.8 which do you think is sharper / has even sharpness profile. The deciding factor being sharpness at f2 & 2.8 of the sigma against the Tamron at 2.8 with the extra stop of the sigma against the tamron macro being bonuses. Any advice is always appreciated. Thank-you in anticipation

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do like the Sigma better. The build is much better, the autofocus is much better, and the only advantage the Tamron really has is the macro capabilities. The Tamron is fairly similar in sharpness, however.

[@johnnytwo-shoes9798]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thankyou =)

[@hansendhl]

Love the reviews! How does this lens compare with the Sony 35mm f/1.8? Would really love a comparison!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I won't be doing any kind of formal comparison, as I don't have either lens on hand anymore, but my feeling was that the Sony has a slight edge in autofocus performance in a few applications, while the Sigma has a slight sharpness edge at wide apertures.

[@hansendhl]

@@DustinAbbottTWI whoa! Dustin Abbott just responded to my comment! I’m telling everyone I know. This is so cool. Which one would you personally have picked if you were to keep one?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Probably the Sigma, as it has a better build quality and I thought the bokeh was more special

[@hansendhl]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks! I’m keeping the sigma. Such a beautifully built lens

[@FrancescoDeLorenzo]

Hi, Dustin. I would like you to compare this lens with the Sony FE 35mm f/1.8. Happy New Year

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Francesco, I'm afraid I won't have more time to give to comparing these. They were both loaners, and I no longer have them on hand.

[@jacobh5817]

Thanks for another great review. For street I’m still on an X-Pro2 with (a/o) a Fujinon 23/f2. Nice and compact, but not the sharpest and most contrasty of all. Knowing you’ve recently looked at the XF23/f2, how would you rate this Sigma vs the Fujinon?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

This lens is undoubtedly better in basically every facet.

[@babookah8116]

Iam working with product photography with a lot of smoke (hookah), iam thinking between sigma 35mm f1.4 or this one? Got a A7 M3, what would your choice? Btw. very informative Review, you got my follow!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I like this lens better. The F1.4 wasn't actually designed for Sony, and there are places it shows.

[@babookah8116]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you a lot, i prefer this one too! I will buy it, much greatefull thanks man

[@gunberriesgame7680]

beautifully detailed as walways. Top stuff.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you liked it!

[@Jack-dj2tj]

Which is the better lens for shooting video, this Sigma or the Sony 35/1.8? Many thanks.

[@rattoh]

sony for video

[@Jack-dj2tj]

@@rattoh Just because of focus breathing or any other reason?

[@rattoh]

@@Jack-dj2tj that and Sony AF is usually more reliable and smoother for video (maybe Dustin can confirm this), but not necessarily bad (still good)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I honestly don't think there is an measurable difference. Both are steady and quiet.

[@four-kings]

sony 16-35 f4 is better for video

[@piotrchmielewski4817]

Quality review as usual!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you, Piotr.

[@BenTuckerPhotography]

Just curious: if you had the choice, this lens or the Loxia 35mm?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would probably go with this one for practicality sake, though the Loxias have lovely color.

[@shawndean100]

Saw this coming soon lens on B&H, then found your review👍

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Awesome, thank you!

[@pahountisg]

I m really thrilled by the direction sigma is taking ! My question would be when should we expect this lens line on Canon RF ? I love the idea of small and high performance, something canon does not address yet, and I do not think they will as they would prefer to segment their products. Thank you for the review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The unofficial word from Sigma is that Canon and Nikon are being very protectionist so far with their RF and Z mounts. I think their plan must be to try to build up a first party base for a few years before opening up the platform. I think that's foolish, as it gives Sony a huge advantage.

[@pahountisg]

@@DustinAbbottTWI as much as I love Canon lens accomplishments, I refuse to have those gigantic lenses. I will patiently wait and stick with most of my ef lenses

[@chesslover8829]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I totally agree. It's the main reason why I won't be buying Nikon, and especially Canon.

[@ekphotography]

I am between this and the Viltrox 35mm 1.8? Any opinions on which would be "better"..?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would say the Sigma is the better lens, in my opinion.

[@ekphotography]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you for answering, I appreciate it..

[@evrythingis1]

How does this compare with the much cheaper and more versatile Tamron 35mm F2.8? Is it mostly paying for a solid metal lens housing?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Also for better autofocus and yes, a much nicer build. The Tamron is good optically, however.

[@evrythingis1]

Thanks for the reply! That is kind of what I figured. It will be interesting to see how this sells compared to the other 14 or so 35mm primes for the system.

[@DjCjFoto]

Great review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you enjoyed it

Can't wait for the new Art 50mm DG DN.. do you know if it comes out soon?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've heard no wind of that yet.

[@DanHelton]

I'm trying to decide between this and the Sony FE 1.8 35mm primarily for video purposes. Do you have an opinion?

[@rkjsll]

Me too! Looking to find an answer for this!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't have a strong opinion, actually. They both work very well. The Sigma is sharper, but I'm not sure if you would even see that in a video application.

[@rkjsll]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you. So I guess both are pretty comparable and one wouldn't go wrong in choosing either.

[@DanHelton]

Thanks. I like the aperture ring but am still leaning toward the Sony.

[@trippalhealicks]

Dustin, I wish you would review Leica lenses; specifically, the 35mm APO-SUMMICRON-SL f/2. I'd like to see your in-depth approach to gear reviews applied to that lens, which is supposedly one of, if not THE greatest lens Leica has produced.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I get a lot of requests to review other systems, but I don't have the time nor money to add another system.

[@trippalhealicks]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Good. Because deep down, as much as I want a Leica SL2, I know my Sony a7RIV is technically better. If you can keep me fueled with Sony reviews, it'll help me stay there. Sony needs to announce that a9III SOON. lol

[@medievil2]

thank you for this great review.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure!

[@stephenspiteri_zunkus]

I am still keeping my fingers crossed that this lens will finally make it to Z mount. It is exactly what I want.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That would be nice!

[@sjsphotog]

Definitely want this lens once I get my Sony a7iv

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That would be nice.

[@WhoIsSerafin]

Man this lens with the new zf camera!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That would be a nice pairing.

[@razone5947]

Odd question, but when the lens hood is on the lens backward (as in, the hood is being stored, not used to shade incoming light) is the aperture ring still comfortably accessible? Great review as always!!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The aperture ring, yes, the manual focus ring, no.

[@razone5947]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you!

[@robertcudlipp3426]

From your comments as to build quality and feel, your praise brings to mind the lovely feel of my not so new Leica M6 & the craft like build quality- from the ubiquitous "single billet" of alloy used to manufacture the Summicron 50/2 & 35 Asph.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's not a bad comparison.

[@jlexploretheworld1164]

Sigma amazes us again!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a lovely little lens.

[@kornasteniker3939]

Haha I understood: "just a gasket to help with Dustin moisture" 😂 Nice review and nice lens! If Sony or Panasonic finally manages to get good SooC Jpeg colors I would probably switch to Full frame some time in the near future. ;-)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do spit a lot while I shoot ;)

[@philipau3847]

I know it's probably splitting hairs, but how does this compare to the batis 40mm when it comes to image quality?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've changed my testing protocols since doing the Batis 40, so I'm working off of mental impressions, but I would say that any difference would indeed be splitting hairs. I wouldn't call that a deciding factor in your choice.

[@keithjanda6638]

Would the Sony 24-70mm GM at 35mm compare in sharpness and bokeh?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Not at sharp at wide apertures, but close. The bokeh would favor this lens.

[@JasonBagherian]

If Sigma could turn these lenses in to micro cinema primes with a real manual focus and aperture ring then these would be perfect for mirrorless video production. I refuse to buy any lens today that has a focus by wire system and it's a shame because these lenses along with the Sigma 35mm 1.2 would be dream lenses. Thanks for the video.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's going to be a real challenge for you, as basically all mirrorless autofocus system are (by necessity) focus-by-wire.

[@romangleyzer4567]

I believe the old version of sigma 35mm f1.4 IS a real manual focus lens but it is a lot bigger

[@IanWilkinson]

That was quick! :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's thanks to Sigma getting me early access to the lenses.

[@limagepicture9023]

Perfect Review 👍 This is the New 35mm « Summicron » for Sony 😉

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's a nice though.

[@maheshgvelly]

Is this better than Sony F1.8 ? For bothering Video & photo ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There are areas where it is better. I'm not sure it is better with autofocus, but I didn't see it as being worse. It is sharper, however.

[@maheshgvelly]

@@DustinAbbottTWI understood. If it’s video first go with Sony if it’s photo first it’s sigma

[@frontstandard1488]

Sigma's approach to weather sealing is realistic IMO. This fad of using sophisticated electronic cameras in the rain is based on marketing, and people's unrealistic ideas of engineering. Whilst the equipment may function fine, moisture will inevitably get inside these systems and lenses. Corrosion is being invited by doing so. Metal and water don't mix well. I am now reluctant to buy second hand lenses or cameras for this reason. A rain cover or an umbrella are what I use.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

What about in extremely dusty or humid environments where a rain hood isn't a solution?

[@cinegenies4651]

Great review, thank you ! It seems then that the Sigma 35mm f2 is overall better than the Sony and the Samyang 35mm f1.8... I'm wondering how the 65mm f2 will behave compared to the Zeiss 55mm f1.8 ...

[@gaetanomarrone1991]

there is some videos or photos that show the difference with the sony??

[@cinegenies4651]

@@gaetanomarrone1991 Dustin said in a previous video that the Samyang was on par with the Sony lens. When you look at the chart/resolution test of this Sigma vs the Samyang you see really better optical quality of this Sigma 35mm f2. You can as well have a look at Christopher Frost's comparison between the Samy and the Sony 35mm f1.8 that helps a lot.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The 65mm is very, very sharp. I didn't love the 55mm; I found it functionally fine, but with little character. I think the Sigma 65mm is the better lens.

[@cinegenies4651]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks for your answer Dustin.

[@thirdmort]

I think this might be the 35 that will finally let me sell my Canon 35 1.4L II. The Sony 35's terrible Coma and CA pushed me away from that one (especially for the price). The Samyang build reputation is still... improving. This seems to be everything I want, even if the MFD isn't as good as I would have liked (I'm really impressed with Canon throwing in half macro on theirs). Now time to start saving...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I know what you are saying about the RF 35mm F1.8, but I actually like the optical performance from this lens a lot better.

[@thirdmort]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I think what I liked about the RF 35 is the high potential for creativity more than anything else (didn't get to play with it that long). I'm really excited about this Sigma though! Too bad my next lens will be a 50 :D

[@lamontgilliland9664]

Dustin, I hope to also see your review of the new Sigma 65mm f/2.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

already working on it.

[@lamontgilliland9664]

@@DustinAbbottTWI, looking forward to it and any thoughts you might have in comparing it to the Voitglander 65 APO Lanther f/2 (though the Voigtlander is a macro and MF lens).

[@senthilrajac8596]

Dustin isnthe sigma 35mm F2 is better than samyang 35mm 1.8?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is definitely sharper at wide apertures and has a better build. The Samyang is lighter, has more thorough weather sealing, and is much cheaper.

[@cybernetennis]

Love your purple coat where can one acquire it?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I got it here: Dustin's Coat: www.banggood.com/custlink/vDmYIDnwdZ

[@obscurelines]

3 years later still my favourite lens. Shame I left the system. The s5ii just isn't good enough to warrant it.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I've been interested in feedback on the S5II. It seems like the bodies are lagging a bit in terms of AF and performance.

[@obscurelines]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I'm not a video guy but if the only FF camera in 5 years for stills shoots 7 frames a second with a shutter sound like a Mamiya 6, I don't think it's competitive enough. They are spreading their tech between the S5ii and the g9ii and neither is right for me. The stills focus seemed fine and the operating system is always excellent and quick. But it's not enough.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That sounds about right,@@obscurelines

[@rodneywatkins4731]

When will it be available?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Shipping starts in 2-3 weeks.

[@63MacGuy]

What about video? Eye tracking, focus breathing... vs the Sony 1.8

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Eye tracking works great (as mentioned in the review), and I would say there is more focus breathing than on the Sony. Video is not my main focus, however, as I run about 95% photography and 5% video on my channel. Other reviewers might focus more on the video side.

[@jamesvanderpool6079]

Man, I am a bit baffled at this lens. Looks to be a bit better than my 40 CF, actually goes to f2, but... is only sealed at the mount? Come on Sigma, how much do rubber O-rings cost? On the other hand, looks to be the absolute best fit for the α7C. Hmmmm. Thanks for the review. A bit to chew on, but certainly a tempting offering if I wanted to downsize.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I agree that it would be a great fit for the a7C.

[@chinhp]

Nicely built. Sigma, please make a 30mm F2 or F1.8 DG DN.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

30mm is a bit of an odd focal length on full frame. I think 28mm might be more likely.

[@chinhp]

Yes, it is. I am a fan of Ricoh GR for street photography but I found 28mm a bit wide. On the other hand, the 35mm FF equivalent seems a bit narrow to me. I also tried MFT before. The 15mm F1.7 Pana Leica was my most fav. I found the 30mm focal length a sweet spot for my preference but could not find a compact, similar one for my Sony system. Thanks for great your previews on the Sigma lenses. I pre-ordered the Sigma 100-400 DG DN from your review and link when it was released and have been liking it.

[@four-kings]

@@chinhp Sony 28mm f2

[@lionellow105]

what should I choose? A 400$ sony 35 1.8 or this

[@godsinbox]

what do you already have?

[@lionellow105]

@@godsinbox I have the fe 35 that I bought for 400$

[@godsinbox]

@@lionellow105 the sigma would be a tiny bit better, for more cost and risk of not getting a fair price for the old one. but for more pizazz, the f1.2 or f1.4(40mm) would be more versatile if you can stand the weight. full disclosure - i own none and only look at flickr

[@jonoy4375]

How can you buy Sony 35 1.8 for $400? A used one?

[@lionellow105]

@@jonoy4375 A used one, even wrapped with a matte skin. It definitely pristine in condition

[@JamesClark1991]

Day 1. My guy.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's really more credit to Sigma, who has chosen to give me early access to lenses.

[@raulfrias8436]

i wonder why sigma did not seal the f2, the much cheaper 1.8 rokinon has better sealing on paper

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

True enough. It's like they set a precedent with the 45mm F2.8 and are staying locked into it.

[@dr.mahera9284]

Great review as always Dustin..in your conclusion you mention your preference for this lens over the Sony 35mm 1.8..but I beg to differ..The Sony 35mm 1.8 has better bokeh (no concentric onion rings) and for this focal length which serves for environmental portraiture, I think that is a quality I would prefer more than slight edge in overall sharpness from the Sigma..The build on the Sigma is excellent however and I believe you are getting carried away by this..of the 2 newly released Sigmas I would prefer the 65mm..becuase of its unique focal length (lack of competing lenses at this focal length) and image quality (no bokeh issues)..if you would want to own a lens with this characteristic design and build the 65mm lens is the one to get.. Also I own a Tamron 35mm 1.8 SP for the A-mount which I use with an LA-EA3 adapter on the A7III..Image quality wise and referring back to your review on that lens..the Tamron is sharper than this Sigma throughout the image has similar bokeh with slight onion ring pattern and has no vignette issues..it is also a decent alternative for this Sigma lens..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hmmm, I'm interested in knowing what you are making your assessment of sharpness between the Tamron and the Sigma based on.

[@dr.mahera9284]

Based on your reviews of this Sigma 35mm 2.0 and the Tamron 35mm 1.8 SP and also looking at Christopher Frosts reviews of these 2 lenses..i find that the Tamron is sharper throughout the image at its widest aperture..the Sigma is sharper in the centre but the corners are slightly softer wide open..in terms of bokeh..both the Sigma and Tamron have a slight onion ring pattern..while the Sony 35mm 1.8 has no noticeable busyness

[@dr.mahera9284]

Went back and checked the sharpness and bokeh tests from other reviews..there are a few changes from my initial impressions..Sharpness wise the Sigma 35mm 2.0 is the sharpest throughout the frame followed by the Tamron 35mm 1.8 SP..Sony FE 35mm 1.8 is the weakest here..in terms of bokeh Sony is best, followed very closely by Sigma..the Tamron has the busiest bokeh..i now agree with your overall assessment the Sigma would be the one to get..i am planning to get one myself

[@powerlurker]

sigma shines at sharpness department，but i found their color is too flat，probably due to correction glass filtered some color information

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Zeiss is still tops in that department (Voigtlander, too)

[@youuuuuuuuuuutube]

22:30 "autofocus, I think it's pretty much the same" => obviously I haven't tested the Sigma, but there is no way it can be as good as the Sony lens, I mean it's doing 20fps without any issue, perfect tracking too, also no focus breathing.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Well, in my tests, it was. But how much tracking are you doing at 35mm? Not exactly a demanding focal length for tracking action.

[@godsinbox]

So this will be the last review I watch? Ok, deal!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

LOL. Thanks for the vote of confidence.

[@zdimic]

Dustin, if you're gonna point people to another video, 'standard review', please don't do it after 2 and a half minutes into this video. And honestly, do you have to say it in every, every, every video? How many people do you think drop by to see only one of your videos, and never come back? And are those people your audience, or ones that watch every review? And if it's the later, do you think you need to waste couple of minutes on our time on 1. description of standard vs. definitive review 2. how you don't like screw in hoods, and are rallying against them, eventhough they are traditional part of the rangefinder world, and those are people that are most likely to come to those manual lenses. So manufacturer knows better, but you're convinced you know better?. and 3. that you don't like focus by wire, all mirrorless lenses that are not manual have focus by wire, you find that it's not ideal, but then conclude that it's the same for all, and if you want manual focus, get manual lens. Love your reviews otherwise, and you've been influencing me since the Canon 6D (original) text reviews. Sorry I came in a bit short, but I've been thinking this at least 50 times so far... You are fantastic/amazing, when you're not dragging your feet repeating the same old, same old...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Zhelko. First of all, about 74% of the views on my channel come from those who aren't subscribers, so yes, it is important to quantify that there is an alternative video for two different types of viewers. I actually arrived at this format by polling my audience on multiple occasions, and this was their preferred system by a large margin. My explanation of the difference between the two formats takes about 12 seconds on average. As for screw-in hoods and the manufacturers knowing better - I have been consulted by these manufacturers dozens of times for my opinions, so yes, my opinion does matter, and yes, as a real photographer, there may be occasions when I know better than an engineer who designs but does not use equipment. As for focus by wire, you are making the assumption that everyone knows all mirrorless lenses are not focus by wire, but that's only because you are an informed photographer. Many are not, so I'm not just speaking to experienced photographers but often educating those who are not. I always take people's negative feedback under advisement, but if you were in my shoes, you might discover that it's all a little more complicated than you might think.

[@zdimic]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Dustin, since you took pain to answer, let me clarify what I meant. I feel you missed my point, or points, or said in a politically correct way, I didn't explain well. 1. Explaining different formats of video is fine and cool, but it should not come after sinking 2:30 into the existing video. That's more than 20% of the short video, and 10%+ of long video. I'm saying that should be your first statement. But seriously, do you need to explain it in every video. Non-subscriber doesn't mean someone who is seeing your video for the first time. So 95%(guesstimate) of your viewers have heard this message. I feel you're projecting from your primary vocation - you're dealing by nature with averages over there, and I know that people need repetition, and average people rarely pay attention. But I don't think that's your audience on this channel. Someone checking video reviews of all sorts of weird lenses (rather than basic zoom) is likely to be informed and curious. So, I think you are underestimating your audience. 2. Engineers are not deciding on the feature of the lenses, but product managers. I've been one, though for software/digital products. Job of product managers is to talk to many people, their audience, understand their needs/pain and make decisions that will sell most of whatever they're selling. So, you've voiced your opinion to them, and you've lost. You DO NOT know better than decent product manager. They'd lose a lot more sales from traditionalist, than gain from people that don't want to buy the lens because of the hood. This actually could change, as rangefinder ppl. disappear, so at one point, you will be right. 3. As for focus by wire, similar comments as for #1: education is fantastic, but repeating it again and again, you'e not educating, you're preaching ;) And repeating your own opinion/education makes you look what, a bit full of hubrus? Well, not full, but some for sure. And yeah, same thing for me, otherwise I wouldn't have answered. But I'd like to think that part of the reason I've done it is to help you get better. I could be lying to myself ;)

[@zdimic]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Having said that, I think what I should have said first, is that by doing these videos, you create something useful, and are doing service to the world. You create value. So thank you! And I apologize for not balancing my input early on. I have an explanation, but explanation is not an excuse, so I'll skip it...

[@Che-MingLin]

12:45 Old Taiwan dollars 👍

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes. I've got a collection of older bills.

[@stefanol9272]

I can imagine not liking a apeture ring weird

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I feel the same, but I know from audience feedback that some don't like them.

[@RagingBubuli]

This is looks like a tiny Cine lens.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Agreed

[@dch2896]

Enough distracting ads? Cuts you off half sentence?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Unfortunately I don't have a lot of control over that.

[@vladepast4936]

trusting your opinion is like trusting Fox news...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

LOL - not quite sure which direction you are going with that.

[@vladepast4936]

@@DustinAbbottTWI It is easy, Fox News is a "tell half-truths" or lie, lie, lie network. Do you see where I'm going? You are trying to be nice to everyone, everything (all lenses) is good...You are making it for the clicks, to get more followers and that is wrong. I do not reaspect people like you.

[@DoubleTheDom]

These lenses are frustrating

[@mauriceschoenen]

Why?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Care to elaborate? I didn't feel frustrated by it at all.

[@DoubleTheDom]

Well, the series has a 35mm f2 and 65mm f2 but a 45mm f2.8. I feel like the f2.8 is a bit limited, and the 65mm is in a weird spot. Also the 24mm is f3.5 and all different thread sizes.. They look amazingly builds and I’m drooling over them, and I’m willing for some compromise for the smaller size.. but at the same time I’m feeling like all of sigma lenses are too big or small and limited in some way.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I can understand the frustration over different filter threads, though the contrast is that Tamron had to make certain design compromises to accommodate a 67mm filter thread mandate. The 65mm is actually a great focal length. I've got the Voigtlander 65mm F2 and love the focal length.