Sigma 60-600 vs Sony 200-600: BEST WILDLIFE ZOOM LENS!

[@capturelightmedia]

With all these great Sigma and Tamron lenses coming out, as a Canon RF user, my soul hurts more and more with each release.

[@edvelfilms]

Canon made a dick move when they blocked any third party lens to use their RF mount. RIP Canon users.. you're attached to give money directly to canon.

[@capturelightmedia]

@@edvelfilms Also, whichever brand you use, you're giving your money to someone. One way or another, you have less money and more gear. What matters is what you make with it.

[@ArtKingjr]

Exactly why I bought both

[@imreallydamntired]

agreed i wouldnt be able to live without my 35-150 f2-2.8 tamron 🥺🥺

[@mrwashur1991]

The fact that Leica allows 3rd party lenses is an even bigger slap in the face.

[@youuuuuuuuuuutube]

+1 for showing how it balances on the tripod and for showing stabilization results.

[@evanlauber]

i can balance my 60-600 on my manfrotto nitro fluid head and fotopro e9h gimball just fine.

[@fondfarewell2]

You guys along with chris frost and matt granger do the best lens reviews. Thanks for the work you put in for these reviews.

[@joe_y.]

Dustin Abbott my friend. Dustin Abbott.

[@dicekolev5360]

They are Sony biased. Can't trust them fully. You need to find more trustworthy people ;)

[@Al.j.Vasquez]

@@dicekolev5360 Would you say that Christopher Frost would purposefully make a non Sony lens look worse than it is?

[@dicekolev5360]

@@Al.j.Vasquez Frost has Sony camera, Nikon, Canon, Fuji, Panasonic even if I'm not mistaken and he reviews them all + 3rd party lenses no matter the mount. I can't even put him in a same sentence with the Northrups 🤷‍♂️

[@chelseanorthrup8787]

Thank you!

[@lolobueno4877]

😂Wonderful Chelsea’s face at 2:22 after saying “mine doesn’t suck”. Love you

[@leokashian8846]

I thought she was going to burst out laughing.

[@MarkSmithphotography]

Send all the birds to me!!! Lol great comparison.

[@TonyAndChelsea]

MARK SEND MY OSPREY BACK!!! I'm so bored lol.

[@MarkSmithphotography]

@@TonyAndChelsea lol! In due time.

[@brandennall]

I had a Sigma 50-500 for over a decade and it was a staple on my 'car/travel' camera. I could take a photo of an elephant or the bird on it's back. Super convenient! Good to see this new 'update' option.

[@wildlifehouse]

Great comparison! Thanks! Literally just got the Sony 200-600 and was worried when I heard about the Sigma but, after watching this, the Sony is a keeper (for my needs)! You guys rock and keep up the great work!

[@TheAegisClaw]

Most of the other reviews are saying this lens is less sharp then the 150-600 and the 150-600 is definitely less sharp than the 200-600, I've personal experience of that. Not seen any lens to beat the 200-600 on sharpness except big primes.

[@Athiril]

I got the tamron 150-500 a while ago and it’s very sharp.. the Sony was sold out. Sony is internal zoom though which is great

[@sonofnothing]

Yeah for the same price, it's not an argument. Sony all the way. The extendable lenses are wack. However, a 150-600 sigma C For less than half the price, then it may be worth it on a budget.

[@Jabber-ig3iw]

@@sonofnothing not necessarily, like they said at times animals come really close to you and 60mm is way better than 200mm. Changing lenses repeatedly is a PITA, 2 cameras with 2 lenses is expensive so 60-600 is way more versatile than 200-600. I really want the Sony but the dilemma is the Sigma is way more versatile.

[@wk99]

Thanks Tony and Chelsea for keep posting all the wonderful educational videos even when you guys are sick! I noticed this from the beginning when Chelsea started talking. Please take good care of yourself!

[@kevins8575]

For me, the promary reason to have a zoom with 500 or 600mm focal length is to get the long end of the range. Getting the shorter end comes in handy, but I buy it for the reach and that's where I want the best performance.

[@richardbedford6166]

Great review, thank you. I do not see bird photographers rushing out to sell their 200-600 however. The Sigma is heavier, much more expensive (here in the UK anyway), unbalanced on tripods, horrible extension to lens body when zooming, and a so-so build quality - all compared to the 200-600. The 200-600 is so well built, lighter, sharp, quick & silent auto-focus and at a a great price. I've never really used anything less than 200mm as a commercial bird photographer (wild birds) in 25 years. The 200-600mm is also very nearly comparable to my Sony 600mm f4 at f6.3 in terms of sharpness and autofocus speed.

[@antonoat]

What is a “commercial Bird photographer” please enlighten me! 👍😀

[@AstralviewsUK]

​@@antonoatI think what he's trying to say is that he's 40+ and occasionally posts bird images to Shutterstock.

[@Flexipop76]

@@antonoatlol

[@masiguru9982]

Back in the day, shooting my daughter's softball games, the Sigma 50-500 was a game changer. I could cover all the bases and the out field standing at the same spot. Did not need to change positions. Loved the extra zoom range.

[@ryandetert450]

Yeah I'm shooting baseball on 150-500mm Tamron. Wish I had money for the sigma. Can't cover the nearest base at 150mm.

[@cindyrickes1244]

The most significant take away from this video was that Sony limits the fps for 3rd party lenses. Thank you for this info! Also, I was about to buy a Canon camera this week but cancelled the order because of your video telling me about no 3rd party lenses for Canon RF. I appreciate your help!

[@alansach8437]

Rumor has it that Sigma will announce an agreement with Canon to produce RF lenses possibly as early as February.

[@aliendroneservices6621]

2:18 This entire video, beautifully summarized by Chelsea in three words.

[@kqschwarz]

You guys are great. I watch you because of the combination of technical information and practical advice, plus the banter between you two keeps it interesting. Sorry you felt you had to work with colds. I hope you recover soon. All the best.

[@garynelson4485]

60-600 is a great range for shooting baseball! I sometimes can't use my 200-600G because I can't shoot the nearest base or the batters. But what I really want is a 150-400/4 w/o image stabilization (for lighter weight). That way I can use the lens under the lights also.

[@greggeis918]

For sure. My sigma 100-400 was pretty useful but realized how much the AF was lacking once I got my 200-600. Sounds like this 60-600 would fix the focus. 200mm is definitely too tight within half a base line, but I would miss the small zoom throw of the 200-600. Compromise either way but the 60-600 would be a compelling all around lens.

[@gordonyz4]

@@greggeis918 sigma af < tamron

[@Jwitherow1964]

Did you know? Y’all are the only photographer Chanel that ever mentions extension tubes, if it was not for y’all I would have never bought or knew about them, no photographers bag is complete with out these, so here’s a great big Thank you!! From all us photographers that you have help over the years. Love y’all God bless

[@TheSmartWoodshop]

Hey Tony, I was thrilled to see you giving recognition to Mark Smith in Florida. He's an exceptional bird photographer and storyteller, and I've been a fan of his work for a long time. As a fellow wildlife shooter, I can attest to the valuable lessons and inspiration I've gained from Mark's artistry. He's truly one of the best in the field.

[@brianriebedriveselectric]

Thanks for pushing through! Hope you’re both feeling better!

[@donaldlaing8397]

Great vid guys! Loads of useful info presented in an even-handed style. I'll be packing my extension tubes from now on after that scene on focus breathing. Keep it up!🤩

[@raven6studios]

I've used the Sigma 50-500 and Tony is correct...when used in the field over long periods of time dust does get in internally. I've used this lens all around the world filming wildlife professionally and saw this first hand. I tried to send it in for cleaning and was told that the internal workings had a sticky coating and therefore they are unable to clean the lens. Having dust spots grow as you zoom in created longer editing time! I'm looking forward to trying the 60-600

[@GV2755]

The Bigma 50-500 was a staple for many of us for years. Now we have "son of Bigma."

[@connemara522]

I am getting ready to go on safari (and do high school wrestling photos). If you could only choose 1 lens---which would you go with?

[@CostaMesaPhotography]

Sounds like you're both recovering from colds...you look energetic and happy so glad to see! Nice review video as well. Happy New Year!

[@TonyAndChelsea]

Thank you and happy new year to you! We actually still feel like garbage!

[@J36Ops]

While the Sigma is great for wildlife, you missed the opportunity to discuss what to my mind is one of the biggest advantages of the extra range on the short side. If you are photographing sports (football, lacrosse, field hockey) the action frequently moves quickly from close to the sideline you are standing by to the far end zone, or vice versa. With this lens you can get close ups of both the quarterback throwing the pass 15 yard from where you are standing, and then the reception 60 yards away.

[@edrader]

more people shoot wildlife

[@J36Ops]

@@edrader probably true, but there are plenty of dads on the sideline shooting their kids games as well. I didn't say to ignore the wildlife shooting advantages, just to add a note for the athletics shooters as well. I shoot both.

[@slimphotog]

9:00 I don't blame the birds. Mark Smith is aweseome.

[@fgb3126]

So...the Sigma is for mirrorless cameras? I missed that DC DN discussion at the start.

[@JenniferKlinger]

You both look tired on this video, but still manage to give so much insight. Never shot wildlife, yet this informations were really good. Bravo

[@rocketrollsvlogs7625]

Hope you guys feel better. Thanks for the commitment to your craft and profession.

[@Ayubgn]

I like the confession at the end. It makes the whole difference

[@sullivandamn]

Man I never thought of external zoom as sucking air in! That’s kind of scary lmao

[@NicholasStein]

The Sony limit of 15fps on 3rd party lenses is a HUGE gotcha. I had never heard that before. I wonder if the same limit applies to video with my FX-30. On my 55" 4k monitor and full screen, the Sigma seems like the colors are a bit more vibrant and lean less into the blues.

[@EmilWall]

It shouldn't apply to video though?

[@daran0815]

It doesn't. The limit applies "only" to stills photography with AF enabled.

[@stevearita3267]

This was an excellent comparison video, thank you very much for doing it.

[@PhotoLillia]

You both rock! Love you both and your so knowledgeable. Thank you for sharing 😀😀💕💕

[@brucea.kenney7957]

I just want to say you guys are great. Informative and have great attitudes.

[@aytraf]

Really loved the section starting at 9:00. I tasted a bit of the fun you get while doing bird/wildlife photography!

[@groggu]

Thanks for the helpful review. Hope you’re feeling better soon!

[@sijodee]

I notice the Sony is bigger diameter.Does that affect the difference in light that gets into the camera?

[@01gsx1]

Great review. Chelsea, she's so funny. Thank you, guys .

[@shooterscott]

Nice work on the video. I’m new to your channel, I appreciate the way you both present yourselves and the gear. Thanks

[@rinku533]

Superb review..waiting for time to compare these two lens ...Love from India..

[@houserhythm]

No mention that you can't use a TC on Sony with the Sigma?

[@PaulTakesPhotos]

I love the 200-600 because the focus is fully internally. The 60-600 external zoom is one thing, the weight another different things. My Sony 200-600 is sharp until 550-570 mm after which it becomes less sharpened

[@toloman]

Nice comparison, loved the Mark Smith mention :D

[@MichalOlender]

Are these 2 the best lenses with those focal lengths one the market?

[@ben.huynh.2012]

Great review , Thanks. Is the Sigma 60-600 sharper Than the Sigma 150-600mm ?

[@kaimelis]

i wonder how does it compare to the tamron 50 - 400 overall. tamron seems to be pretty sharp and quick, and im wondering if the extra weight and price is worth the +200 milimeters. but that stabe seems to be very nice, i would like to see how it performs for video, because the tamron is so so in that regard.

[@T-Slider]

Thanks! Get better soon! What is the frame rate with the 7RV?

[@alien6551]

A great video lots of info

[@JABloch]

wow, never knew how much focus breathing could affect those super telephotos, that's nuts.

[@isabelladavis1363]

many thanks for sharing great information...stay blessed

[@straighterline]

I hope you both are feeling better soon.

[@TonyAndChelsea]

Thanks James! Every day is a little better... And we're on day 7.

[@bahaatamer1245]

Ironically, I tested their Canon EF version of that lens (on my R6) just two days before they announced the Sigma version. Honestly, even the DSLR version ain't bad at all

[@withoutpassid]

Thank you for your very informative and helpful review on both lenses.

[@leerothman7570]

One thing you missed. The A7R5 is the ONE body in the lineup that provides Sync Steadyshot which will easily equal the amazing stabilization of the Sigma. Too bad you didn't get the opportunity to see the A7R5 with the 200-600 in action. it's amazing now as well. Make sure you update the firmware on the lens for sure for those who have a A7R5.

[@commane21]

I don’t see “sync steadyshot” in any sony literature. What exactly are you referring to?

[@ScottBrills]

@@commane21 I think Lee means the Active Steadyshot

[@connemara522]

I am currently looking at this camera.... I am getting ready to go on safari and can only take 1 lens... torn between 50-400 and 60-600! or even the 5-500 :). do you love the A7R5? I'm torn between the Sony and the Nikon Z8

[@aniketranade4422]

Excellent point about "Focal Shrinking" starting at 6:20 but I did not quite understand how and why that happens and why extension tubes are able to overcome it. Could you explain it in more detail or provide a link to any existing video. If the barrel is fully extended out in case of Sigma, how does a fully extended barrel become 300mm if the barrel does not retract back in?

[@robertbrown9785]

love your reviews!

[@kmulhall8233]

Loved the call out to Mark Smith lol! Great video.

[@nivethanuthayakumar4718]

That was a calm review Chelsea trying to hold in her laugh after 2:18 lol

[@vishalzparadize]

2:18 Enjoyed that joke a little too much 🤣

[@jeffhampton6972]

I really appreciate the detailed description and context you give your reviews! Also the humor is much appreciated. Damn seagulls.

[@Bo_Hazem]

Amazing review, and I have the 200-600mm and think it's the better one mainly for weather sealing. But might as well buy the Sigma if I get another Sony body or if I can only carry one lens as 60mm on a full frame is wide enough in most cases and the insane close focusing distance.

[@anniegrant8136]

As always entertaining and informative for us hobby photographers considering lenses and cameras. Thanks!

[@yahya2700]

Can I get a quick review on that red jacket you’re wearing? Is it worth it?

[@TonyAndChelsea]

Yeah it's great. Chelsea just ordered the exact same one.

[@frankiebmedia9003]

Her face at 6:20 when he says “focus shrinking” 😂😂

[@PhotoArtBrussels]

Good and useful feedback! Thanks

[@christopherloffredo9126]

Mine does not suck…lol. Major point as I recently sent my Sony 100-400mm GM in to be cleaned, which I also had to do with my Canons in the past. 99% of the time I personally use my 200-600mm at 400mm+ and love its balance. THANKS Sony for sharing your mount and giving us third party options like this.

[@markharwood]

Great comparison video thanks! I see you have the same cover on your Sony as I do - what a bugger that cover on the lens hood was to get on! But happy with the RolanPro cover over all.

[@Lifetogo]

What camera backpack can you recommend for a larger setup like S5 II or EOS R6 with 60-600mm + second body + 24-70mm and maybe 50mm lenses? On top batteries, filters and a dji mini 3 drone would be awesome.

[@QuietOC]

I think you are off on the focal length reduction. At minimal focus distance the 200-600 has a bit tighter framing than the 400mm prime I compared it too. The 200-600 doesn't show much breathing.

[@TonyAndChelsea]

I demonstrate this with extreme detail in the video.

[@AdamCasada]

@matthew, undoubtedly the lens you compared to also has focus breathing

[@Oztubee]

What's your opinion on pairing this lens with Sony 6400 camera? picture quality? Is it worth it or is this lens ideal for a full sensor camera. Thank you

[@ulrikno]

Can you test the stabilization effectiveness of the 200-600 on the A7RV (which have sync IBIS for Sony lenses) vs Sigma vs Sony without sync IBIS? :)

[@chetananandlove]

Awesome comparison 👏 👌 👍

[@robertv4083]

Thanks for the review! If I did go with the Sigma do you recommend a specific camera?

[@robertv4083]

Is it just the burst speed that's limited to 15fps (not video)? Sorry, new to this stuff :)

[@cefoxiii1]

Hi, I watch you guys all the time and appreciate your reviews. I'm going out this Monday to take photos of Eagles for the first time and I am considering purchasing the Sigma 60-600 F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM. Question, will it work on the Nikon Z7 and the FTZ adaptor? Is it an FX lens? I am looking at it because of the price. Is there a better lens option of me as a first time wildlife shooter? Thanks! Clayton Fox

[@GOLDDYNACO]

I was here to look at Sigma's new telezoom. Suddenly I see a flying seagull take a fish out of the sea. I have been interested in (sea)birds all my life and have seen a lot but NEVER seen anything like this! Completely lost focus on the lens, but have googled around and asked my competent friends if this is something seagulls do - usually. NO, this is probably something that can be demonstrated to ornithologists and zoological scientists.

[@gamebuster800]

You mention "sucking in air" at ~2:18 - could that be the reason one of my zoom lenses is filled with weird crystals inside?

[@henryt9254]

Yes, and the lens get softer as it ages. Not to mention there is also a lot more flare as a result of the dusty coating on the inside. Servicing is a chancy ordeal. I did that once to a long zoom and thereafter could never retain the sharpness as original.

[@renes4302]

I assume not available as an EF mount... sad day! Would love this for my 90D. I'm trying to decide which zoom to buy for it.

[@papolini109]

Nice review. Your guys are totally right, No limitations for the 3rd party lenses in fps please. By the way I like to shoot in Rocky Neck and Harkness Park too.

[@ollypurrs8677]

Those with a1’s I doubt would be considering this lens! A better test would have been with a Sony A7 iv

[@Hunterwelshwild143]

Hello Tony & Chelsea, I am a wildlife photographer that does a lot of wildlife photography and videography in the backcountry of Colorado. I am planning to buy either this lens or the Sony in the near future. Due to my shooting style I really am interested in the sigma more because I like to shoot wide images of wildlife to show context and a scene as well as portraits of animals. The only thing possibly keeping me from pulling the trigger on the sigma is I’ve heard mixed thoughts about image quality. I will gladly switch back and forth lenses if it means the image quality will be noticeably better especially at the tighter zoom ranges 400-600. In your experience shooting with this lens in real world scenarios do you think it would be a noticeable difference in image quality that will make me regret not opting for the Sony?

[@ryonadcock]

I love that you are comparing the Sigma lens against Sony lens. Great job as you made me think outside of my, "Personal Box".

[@ulyssessait]

10:26 I agree with you. It the reason Im going to buy A7iv instead of R6mk1. I have budget of $2200. But with E mount has pletora of lens freedom (yes im going to pick sigma) compared to RF mount, I think Sony is the way now. Im talking as someone from 80D for years. A7iv will be my first full frame camera.

[@sudhaneelakantan843]

Have both a74 and r6ii and canon is way better IMO unless you have had and love sony

[@ulyssessait]

@@sudhaneelakantan843 r6ii is expensive in my country. a7iv is on same price as r61

[@sudhaneelakantan843]

@@ulyssessait I found that with adapter, the EF lenses with adapter work fantastic. And the R7 has most of the features at less, same APSc format as 80D and you don't need new lenses even then till you can afford. I found Sony very frustrating to learn menus and use. Though yes, it takes great snaps

[@RobertShaverOfAustin]

Great video. I want one of those. Oh, and what does "Fixed Zoom" mean in the the lens name: *Sigma 60-600mm f/22-32 Fixed Zoom*

[@lafonevc5663]

I have the 200-600 and when I want something more compact I use the 100-400 Sony or the 150-500 tamron. This new sigma looks good for people who only want one lens from short to long but the weight is off putting. It’s a do all the things slightly less well sort of lens but it looks sharp and well made. Such a positive to have so many good lenses from Sony and third parties. It’s good to see an improvement over the previous sigma 150-600 for Sony e as that was very disappointing AF wise. At the same price as this new sigma for wildlife the sony 200-600 still represents great value.

[@duffy2512]

Hello Chelsea & Tony! As always you are as quick as possible to present us the new products. One thing you didn't mentioned and that was one of the reasons why I didn't go for the old 150-600 Sigma e-mount, is the fact that you can't use an extender like the 1.4x or 2.0x from Sony. I assume that is still not supported with the new 60-600 Sigma, right? Best regards Paul

[@TonyAndChelsea]

I'll test this and make a follow-up short.

[@bjdent]

That was my same question, Tony and Chelsea. I just returned from a Safari in Kenya and really enjoyed shooting on the Tamron 150-500 but I wonder if I would have been better served by a lens with teleconverter support. There is no official teleconverter support for a third-party, super telephoto, or e-mount lense; as far as I know. However, I'm curious if any of the lenses will simply work with a sony or third-party teleconverter.

[@idol031808]

@@TonyAndChelsea I’m not impressed with the 1.4 tc performance on the Sony 200-600 either.

[@LucidFX.]

AWESOME video and so very informative! what was refreshing was no adverts!! I GET IT and i understand but sometimes 3 times in a vid is tiring LOL but I think i know what i will buy. so, do i stay Canon (reluctance) or go Sony A7R IV... not happy with Canon's stance on 3rd party lenses

[@garymeredith2441]

Okay Tony I'd like the review that you and Chelsea did it was good , so with the Canon mount model will that Sigma 60-600 on the Canon mount model will it work as good as the Sony one that you tested their .

[@BluZephial]

have you tried balancing the lens while half way zoomed? It is the best way I've seen for these types of things

[@TonyAndChelsea]

That's about as close as you can balance it since the foot is too short.

[@senthiljams]

@@TonyAndChelsea may I ask why do you use a gimbal head? Would balance be a problem on tripod if I use other type of heads, say a fluid head or a ball head? Also, does the Song 200-600 really not have a similar balance issue while zooming on a gimbal head? I was expecting the movement of lens internally when zooming would be enough to shift the center of gravity on the lens?

[@t.raghavendrat.raghavendra3841]

Very nice👍👏💯 and thanks for sharing👍

[@alwynmc1]

Great Comparison!!!, You really made me rethink Buying the Sony>

[@ch132212]

How much extension did you use? I’m going to try this on my 400mm while I save my pennies for this 60-600!

[@AnOpticalView]

Tony & Chelsea, I always love your practical sensible reviews and always feel I can trust them. Regarding the limitation in FPS (on the A1) I recently read Sony categorically claiming the limitation applied to third party lenses is the fault of those third parties and not Sony. However, that being said, is not limiting a product like this anti-competitive and anti-customer/consumer? I thought Apple had been penalised for the same activity?

[@Skipsul]

Having borrowed the Sony, and not being overly impressed with it (especially compared to the 100-400GM, which is fantastic), I've been curious how this would stack up. But boy you are right about the dust sucking. I've got a specialized tech vacuum I use to clean the 100-400.

[@aliendroneservices6621]

The 100-400 suffers from the same external-zoom problem. What kind of vacuum is that (brand/model)?

[@d_r_e_g]

Interesting. Why did you like 100-400mm so much? I own both and my experience is the opposite: lens creep, no strap eyelets, essential 10m-2.4m focus limiter mode is missing. While even not being sharper than 200-600mm except for the corners. I still use GM when I need a closer reach/MFD or more compact size but it just feels like a much older development.

[@Skipsul]

@@d_r_e_g It's definitely an older design, but I've found it more sure and fast in its autofocus on my A9, where the 200-600 I borrowed seemed slower and tended to focus hunt a lot. And at least to my eyes on both the A9 and A7R3, the images from the 100-400 were much sharper and clearer. The minimum focus distance of the 200-600 made it impractical for anything but distance shooting, while a lot of what I need is closer in. And the GM, because it does collapse, is much much easier for me to pack for travel, event, dance shoots, etc.

[@mikehines14]

@@Skipsul I've found the exact same thing. I've put my 100-400 up against the 200-600, the Tamron 150-500 and sigma 150-600 so far the sony 100-400 has beat them all in image quality, even cropping in to match at 600mm.

[@CesarinPillinGaming]

which vacuum you recommend? my 24-105mm F4 has quite a bit of dust inside (its my to go lens). Luckily my 150-600mm hasnt got dust in yet despite my usage.

[@NeonShores]

The advantage of the external zoom on the Sigma is the fact that you can push/pull to zoom instead of using the zoom ring so that could be useful for faster zooming.

[@TonyAndChelsea]

I haven't found the push/pull capability to be an advantage. It extends your arm awkardly, there's no grip on the end to push or pull it, and it's not significantly quicker because the extension speed seems limited by either the gearing or the airflow.

[@mrwashur1991]

Also the Sony has like a 90° focus throw so it’ll still be quicker. There’s zero advantage for an external zoom over internal. I’m not harping on the sigma at all but their external zoom is cumbersome. It’s even less worth it when the Sony is the same price.

[@jassenjackman3284]

Super interesting comments on the use of tube extensions with big zooms. Have you done a comparison between extension tubes and teleconverters? When would the teleconverter have the advantage to justify the extra expense?

[@chrisscarffe7416]

Very useful thanks

[@ericphalin85]

Hey guys, great video! I am a hybrid shooter and was wondering if you did any tests with this on the video side of things as well? Would be very interested to see which is better for videos as well. Keep up the great work!

[@15minutestravel]

For plane sporting, which camera body lines also is best video and photoshoot? can you suggest a lens and body?

[@rudynorvelle2870]

That is a great review as always. I wish I had a camera that could use the new Sigma. All I have right now is a Canon 7D and a 7D MKII

[@lookingforplaces]

very interesting video, big like! Greetings from Italy

[@legolindirteso9430]

@TonyAndChelsea Tony you complained about the length of the foot, but did you know it exists replacement foot for the sigma 150-600 mm and for some other big lenses from canon or nikon? As I suppose that sigma didn't change the design, I suspect that the replacement foot will be compatible. The manufacturer is jobu design

[@SergiyKalynyuk]

Would you be kind enough to compare new fuji 150-600 along with sigma and Sony zoom lenses of the same range. Thank you