SIIIG vs SyfeTalk: Are there Contradictions in the Qur'an?

[@KafirGoy]

Syfe is reading of a script written by his sheiks and heavily edited videos, everyone would love to see a live debate.

[@SIIIG1]

I would too! Hopefully we can set something up!

[@garyknowles2822]

@@SIIIG1 Sign me up for that live interview bro

[@hamicestormgladiator]

Wouldn't the very fact that he is appealing to tafseer prove that the Quran is not detailed in its explanation?

[@i.hopeinJesus]

Exactly

[@theonejesusloved7379]

It's weird if you think about it. Humans that weren't ordained by God are attempting to explain his own words because they are not clear enough

[@catchme78]

Using tafsir does not imply that the Qur'an lacks detail; rather, it offers context and clarity for a deeper understanding. The Qur'an is clear in guidance, but interpretation helps reveal its full depth. Similarly, commentaries and interpretations of the Bible clarify meanings, historical context, and linguistic nuances.

[@i.hopeinJesus]

@@catchme78 it isn’t the same equivalent comparing Tafsirs to Christian commentaries. Tafsir is almost a necessity to understand the Quran, same goes with the Hadiths. You can’t understand the Quran on its own, you’ll always need the Tafsir and Hadiths with it.

[@catchme78]

@@i.hopeinJesus While tafsir and Hadiths provide valuable context for understanding the Qur’an, it’s not accurate to say that the Qur’an cannot be understood on its own. Many verses are clear and straightforward, conveying essential teachings directly. Additionally, the Bible also has complex passages that benefit from commentary and context for better understanding, suggesting that interpretation is a common practice in both traditions.

[@AlonzoHarris264]

I am an abdul. My prophet muhummud is the best of mankind because he received revelations in aisha's garment.

[@nobody_158]

I am Abdul ,if she is nine she is mine

[@lovechannel3862]

😂😂

[@1The.moon-gt7vf]

Issac married the 3 years old Rebecca and dived married 7 years old girl Mary was 12 when she brings children's

[@AlonzoHarris264]

I am an abdul. My dad's name is abdul My mom's name is abdul My brother's name is abdul My sister's name is abdul My cousin wife's name is abdul My uncle's name is abdul My aunt's name is abdul My cat's name is abdul And we all pray to 8 pebbles in saudi arabia and believe an elevenmonths old is a woman

[@halfwaydead3087]

Yo he changed sides

[@bluebible1199]

@@halfwaydead3087 🤣

[@AlonzoHarris264]

Contradictions in toeheed: 1. islamic theology asserts that allah is one, meaning his essence must be singular and undivided. Otherwise, allah would no longer be the Creator but would be considered a creation made up of different uncreated parts. 2. The salafis and atharis, unlike the maturidis, mutazilites, and asharis, believe that allah's attributes are real and uncreated. They reject metaphorical interpretations of these attributes, arguing that such interpretations could lead to theological innovation. They contend that the salafi/athari position is stronger because islamic scriptures do not describe allah as a Spirit or incorporeal being but as having bodily attributes. 3. This poses a problem: if allah’s essence is undivided, then his uncreated attributes cannot be part of his essence. Otherwise, allah would be divided into parts, which would undermine the concept of toeheed. 4. To address this issue, salafis and atharis argue that allah’s attributes are not part of his essence but are distinct from allah. 5. However, this raises a significant issue: if allah’s attributes are distinct from his essence, it implies the existence of multiple uncreated entities within islam. This creates a theological contradiction, suggesting that allah is not the only uncreated being. 6. In contrast, Christianity does not face this problem because it teaches that God is a Spirit, and attributes are understood metaphorically, which aligns with its doctrine.

[@syedtalhanoor7361]

Where did you get the idea that Allah's attributes are parts? We are not made up of our attributes, they are within us and only describe. They aren't a being on their own. Allah told us a few of His attributes in the Quran, but that is not what the Ashari and Athari disagree upon. What they disagree on is of no importance to Muslims, but to satisfy the people who have trouble imagining Allah when it literally is impossible to do so. It has nothing to do with a Muslim's core belief nor do they have to have the anwer to get to Paradise. Also, Christianity has much larger issues, don't know why you made it seem as if this is the worst thing that can ever be disagreed upon, and not something like the actual Trinity or the reliability of the Bible.

[@theonejesusloved7379]

You still muslim??

[@lukkash]

😂And then WHAT? Do u wanna say that Jehova’s attributes are separate beings which are gods too? Your concept of monotheistic god is quite odd.

[@lukkash]

Bro, SHOW just one passage in the OT where Yahweh revealed Himself as One & Triune - three divine persons, co-equal, co-eternal, one in essence & in hypostatic union. Prove also that Jews believed in trinitarian concept of God thousands years ago.

[@AlonzoHarris264]

​@@syedtalhanoor7361if allah’s attributes are distinct from his essence, it implies the existence of multiple uncreated entities within islam. Definition of being: "something that is conceivable and hence capable of existing" - merriam-webster

[@JoshuaTeasley-m8l]

Thanks!

[@Gady______]

Respectfully we need more dunks on syfe 🗿

[@greenbird679]

If quran is clear, then can someone explain me the meaning of *Alif Laam Meem* in the quran?

[@forsakenbanksy1269]

Syfe is just the type of guy you never wanna hang with

[@SIIIG1]

Thanks for watching everyone! Make sure to keep suporting the ocntent down below: Insta: instagram.com/thesiiig/ Tiktok: www.tiktok.com/@siiig10 Patreon: www.patreon.com/SIIIG1

[@JohnGeometresMaximos]

Half the video you're explaining the age of the guy from the OT. I would have said it's a scribal error - even if it isn't. I really don't mind either way. We shouldn't allow ourselves to fall into their "derailment" traps.

[@SIIIG1]

@@JohnGeometresMaximos Yeah one can say that there is an error in the masoretic. However, i dont think this was an error, as there was already a lot of data in the books of the Kings and chronicles regarding Omri and the House of David.

[@AlonzoHarris264]

When talking to an abdul: Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Is hafs quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is warsh quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is doori quran a quran? A. Yes Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Are all qurans around the world same? A. Yes Q. Do the Sana manuscript and Birmingham manuscript have variants? A. Yes Q. Are qurans preserved word for word, letter for letter? A. Yes Q. In sura 37.12, one quran says "you", another "I"? A. They are different accents Q. How many ahrufs did muhamad recite? A. 7 Q. How many ahrufs did uthman destroy? A. 6 Q. How many ahrufs today? A. 7 Q. How many qiraats did muhamad recite? A. None Q. How many qiraats today? A. 10, 15, 20, 50 Q. Is Bible preserved? A. No Q. Is muhamad prophesied in the Bible? A. Yes Q. Did muhamad marry a child? A. No Q. How old was aisha? A. 6

[@nyctom08]

Siphee turned his mic down 🤣

[@AlonzoHarris264]

I am an abdul. My prophet muhummud believed in 3 allahs, lat, manat and uzza 🫠

[@garyknowles2822]

someone outchea is trolling the OG AlonzoHarris troll and i love it.

[@AlonzoHarris264]

@garyknowles2822 I am the original.

[@JathelyHelliya]

​​@@AlonzoHarris264😐 are you a Human?

[@AlonzoHarris264]

@@JathelyHelliya I am an abdul

[@AlonzoHarris264]

Contradiction in the qurans: sura 6:115 says nobody can change the words of allah sura 2.75 says the Jews changed the words of allah.

[@syedtalhanoor7361]

Well, it's clear you're either not trying to use your brain, or you have hate against Islam for no reason. Allah's words are words, not texts. Anyone can easily take a Quranic text and write something in it. However, that doesn't change the words that Allah spoke.

[@nasiryahaya4184]

@@syedtalhanoor7361How exactly would one change the words of Allah. If i said no one can change my words, doesnt that mean I can also do something that Allah can do? How would one change my words in a way that they cant do the same Allah? Please explain

[@AlonzoHarris264]

​@@syedtalhanoor7361so muslims who recite the qurans are not reciting the words of allah?

[@bluebible1199]

@@syedtalhanoor7361 it says books in the verse doe....quran 6:114-115

[@syedtalhanoor7361]

@@nasiryahaya4184 That's the point. If you say something and someone else changes your words, the words you spoke haven't changed, they were just broadcasted different. Also, this is not an action done by Allah, so I don't know how you can say you can do something Allah can? You speak, someone else distorts.

[@1The.moon-gt7vf]

Contradiction in the Bible The lineage of Jesus according to what was stated in Matthew (1:1-17) and what was stated in Luke (3:23-38) are two completely different lineages. In the Gospel of Matthew we find (27) men to David, while in the Gospel of Luke we find (42) men to David, that is, an increase of 15 people, the difference between the two lineages. Therefore, it becomes clear that it is impossible for them to be truthful together, as one of them must be wrong. In the Gospel of Matthew: 1/ Joseph the carpenter/ 2 Jacob/ 3 Matthew/ 4 Eliezer/ 5 Eliud/ 6 Achim/ 7 Zadok. /8Azor /9Eliakim/10Bihud. /11 Zerubbabel / 12 Shealtiel / 13 Jechaniah / 14 Josiah. /15 Amon /16 Manasseh /17 Hezekiah /18 Ahaz /19 Jotham /20 Uzziah /21 Joram /22 Jehoshaphat /23 Asa /24 Abijah /25 Rehoboam /26 Solomon /27 David And in the Gospel of Luke: 1 Joseph / 2 Heli / 3 Matthath / 4 Levi / 5 Melchi / 6 Janna / 7 Joseph / 8 Mattathias / 9 Amos / 10 Nahum / 11 Hesli / 12 Negai / 13 Mathath / 14 Mattathias / 15 Shimei / 16 Joseph / 17 Judah / 18 John / 19 Resa / 20 Zerubbabel / 21 Shealtiel / 22 Neri / 23 Melchite / 24 Addi / 25 Qasm / 26 Almodam / 27 Er / 28 Joses / 29 Eliezer / 30 Urim / 31 Matthath / 32 Levi / 33 Simeon / 34 Judah / 35 Joseph / 36 Jonah / 37 Eliakim / 38 Meliah / 39 Minan / 40 Matthatas / 41 Nathan / 42 David Thus, there is a number.. {15 individuals} difference between them, and we assume on average that the age of each of them when he gave birth to his son who is in this lineage is at least 20 years, so the period during which they gave birth to these people is 20 x 15 = 300 years! That is, a difference of at least 300 years between the two lineages. The death - they claim - of Jesus on Saturday, April 15 (according to Matthew 17:26 and 1:27). And between the Gospel of John, which confirms that Jesus died on Friday, April 14 (John 13:1, 19:14, 19:31), this is not at all consistent with the concept of the absolute inspiration of the book. The most dangerous contradiction in the false bible (Genesis 6:6) And it grieved the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him in his heart. (Exodus 32:14)... “And the Lord regretted of the evil that he said he would do to his people.” (1 Samuel 15:35). And the Lord regretted that he had made Saul king over Israel” ( contradiction) (Numbers 23:19). God is not a man, that He should lie, nor the son of man, that He should repent. Does he say that or not? Or does he speak but not say hello? Christianity is a contradictory religion, a weak and fragile doctrine built on emotion. F_u_c_k the false biblep

[@Ondonol_]

Nice to se you here.

[@nothingnothing7958]

1. For if there are 2 different genealogies for one person I recommend " Different Genealogies?- Bible Contradiction #1" by Inspiringphilosophy. 2. For the issue of the 14 I recommend " How many generations before Christ?- Bible Contradiction #2" by Inspiringphilosophy. In Genesis 6:6 and the other verses the human authors are trying to explain Gods emotional state so that is why they apply a human term( regret) to him because God is sad that his creation turned out bad. That's not to say God regrets as he is all knowing but he is experiencing something like it.

[@roginyappl7158]

​@@Ondonol_The 4 Gospels are different emphases highlighting different aspects of Jesus life and his Ministry The Gospel of Matthew record more about Jesus teaching in sermon form than any other Gospels for report for the Jews Luke records to stay focused on knowing Jesus Christ for the Gentiles In the New Testament, Matthew includes 27 names and Luke 42, when recording genealogy, can we put these together for a whole list or are there differences? Actually, Matthew listed 42 names to trace Jesus’ lineage from Abraham, the Hebrew Father of Faith to Jesus. Matthew’s gospel was written for the Jewish Christian audience in Antioch so tracing lineage back to Abrahamic and Davidic descent was important to establish Jesus’ legitimacy and credibility at the start of his gospel. (Matthew was bent on gematria to stress the number “7” for perfection in God’s plan of salvation.) In contrast, Luke listed Jesus’ lineage from Adam to Jesus in Chapter 3 (not the first chapter). Since Luke was writing for the Gentile audience, he traced Jesus’ lineage back to Adam, the first of all born in order to establish that God’s salvation in Jesus’ ministry was for the entire human race, not just the Jews. Biblical scholars have in the past tried to reconcile all the names between the two gospels and it went nowhere every time. There are differences and these days nobody takes the actual names as exact or historical. They just won’t match and they’re not complete anyway so don’t bother. The lists were provided by the evangelists for theological reasons not historical. The gospels record two genealogies of Jesus Christ. In general most Biblical genealogies don’t record every succeeding person from generation to generation. Hence the difference in the number of individuals named. Matthew’s record traces back to Abraham to show that Jesus was a Jew and through David’s line to show He is qualified to rule from the throne of David as Messiah. Luke’s genealogy goes all the way back to Adam and follows back down to Mary. Luke clearly states that Jesus was supposed , or presumed to be the son of Joseph, yet in chapter 2 we have the record of the angel Gabriel coming to Mary to announce that she would conceive a child by a miraculous overshadowing of the Holy Spirit so that the child would be the Son of God. It is from Mary that Jesus Christ derives His Jewish ethnicity as a descendant of Abraham, His place in the kingly line of David and the singular distinction of having been conceived without an earthly father. Numbers 23:18-19 [18] And he took up his parable, and said, Rise up, Balak, and hear; Hearken unto me, thou son of Zippor: [19] God is not a man, that he should lie; Neither the son of man, that he should repent: Hath he said, and shall he not do it? Or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? God cannot become a Man that he should lies Balam says God cannot be a Man that he cannot lied to people And God cannot be a Son of Man that he changed his mind You are twisting the Verse Read Colossians 1:[15] Christ is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: Jeremiah 32:[27] Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh: is there any thing too hard for me? John 1:[14] And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. You're just fabricating False Contradictions and you're so Confused in the Bible scripture because you're not enough smart. God bless ✝️🧔‍♀️

[@Ondonol_]

​@@roginyappl7158What did i say for you to make such a large comment response to me? I wasn't the one bringing up the contradiction's i was just happy to se this guy in the comment section becouse i know the brother.

[@roginyappl7158]

@@Ondonol_ listen when I write My comments, it disappeared So when I pick you in the comments Finally is here and it stay still. There is a problem on KZbin It keep deleting my comments on this channel, so I need someone to communicate. Like you, I picking you because my comments will not be Gone. Every time I send a comment without a person to pick, it will be Gone!! 😁 Please don't delete your comments If you do it, KZbin will ban my comment

[@JohnGeometresMaximos]

In Christianity the Logos became flesh. In islam the word of allah became parchment [the quran]. Divine Wisdom entered creation. Literally in the case of the Logos who is the Truth, and allegedly in the case of the quran which is false.

[@badonlikoy5571]

How come a creator question himself on how to create something. And He even comparing himself to human beings. Because human beings cannot have a son without His partner or mate. Read Surah 6:101. When according to Quran, if Allah says "be" it became (read Surah 3:47 & Surah 2:117). So this is a clear contradiction to Surah 6:101.

[@bluebible1199]

12:13 I love how he added those things further proving the lack of explanation in the verse itself 🤣like how is it a detailed explanation then? even if you grant that the verses explain everything IN THEIR CONTEXT, the quran still fails to do that in the verse that Syfe's trying to exegete

[@AlonzoHarris264]

Abduls believe in three qurans

[@Ryan_Nath]

SyfeShout

[@ricetanzania4148]

11:58 allahu ahad? Ythe Arabic is using the Hebrew term Ehad in Arabic one = wahid