CITIZENS OF HISTORY! Decorate your walls with a Simple History Premium Print today: electrify.art/collections/simple-history and don't miss out-grab a 25% discount now!
@FrostyLego225 күн бұрын
i’m broke 😭😭😭
@quinnwaloch97505 күн бұрын
Those dumb bastards
@davidspencer83735 күн бұрын
Like video
@wolfmechace13385 күн бұрын
starting with the willy d
@mingfanzhang46005 күн бұрын
😊
@kevindavidson88024 күн бұрын
This reminds me of the old joke, During WWII my grandpa downed 10 German fighters, worst mechanic they ever had.
@xvoidfight18894 күн бұрын
I don't get it
@brunozeigerts63794 күн бұрын
@@xvoidfight1889 He was a German mechanic.
@nyxspiritsong55574 күн бұрын
That's hilarious! Love it!
@kevindavidson88024 күн бұрын
@@xvoidfight1889 I live in the US, most people assume when they talk about their grandpas in the war they were on the allied side, so when they say My grandpa downed 10 German fighters they think the persons grandpa as an allied fighter pilot. The joke ends up being one of those unexpected twist endings.
@xvoidfight18894 күн бұрын
@kevindavidson8802 Oh, now it sense 🤣
@aleksandarvil57185 күн бұрын
*_"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."_* - Napoleon Bonaparte
@linuxsuperuser5 күн бұрын
i feel like he learned that from experience.
@PaintingWithLindy5 күн бұрын
@@linuxsuperuser Most likely from Russia 🇷🇺
@kingofohio56895 күн бұрын
Goes still Hard 🔥🔥🔥
@julianmhall4 күн бұрын
@@PaintingWithLindy Unlikely as Napoleon allegedly said it or something very similar in 1805 at Austerlitz.
@fatdaddyeddiejr4 күн бұрын
I think Sun Tzu said that. And Napoleon you want to talk about mistakes? Let's have a war with Russia. How did that turn out?
@Sandman100325 күн бұрын
Okay but imagine going down in history as the man who saved the president who ended WW2, by shooting a moving torpedo with a pistol
@liamhashmi77505 күн бұрын
wait what??
@cartoonraccoon20785 күн бұрын
@@liamhashmi7750 Didn't watch the video and went straight to the comments, huh?
@cartraz18395 күн бұрын
Some guy tracked the torpedo with his pistol but didn't shoot
@liamhashmi77505 күн бұрын
@@cartoonraccoon2078 yea pretty much lol
@xCosmicMuffinManx5 күн бұрын
@@pfiction2453Technically he didn't, Truman did 🤓
@ExtantPerson5 күн бұрын
Luigi Cadorna would be an excellent lesson for aspiring officers so that they can learn everything NOT to do.
@markstyles12465 күн бұрын
If you can't be a good example, try to be AN example?
@thingamabob39024 күн бұрын
in the same way as aspiring tank designers are shown the british Valiant tank ( in Bovington museum ?) to try and find all of the many flaws.
@DonPatrono3 күн бұрын
He is in fact studied in Italian military academies with a big red lettering of "Do NOT do this, it is dumb, and if you do it you are even dumber"
@mattiaproserpio14532 күн бұрын
Haig is worse than cadorna
@silver10d8119 сағат бұрын
As an Italian, I fully agree whit you
@wilhelmvillagracia96705 күн бұрын
Luigi Cardona was the best Austro-Hungarian general ever.
@TC1YT5 күн бұрын
Best joke by far 😂 he helped Austria Hungary way more than his country italy
@lantruongtuan5824 күн бұрын
They should made him a national hero lol.
@javierandreszunigagarcia87914 күн бұрын
CadoRna, not CaRdona...
@RaltBoi4 күн бұрын
Mama mia
@aliakber7754 күн бұрын
We must thank cadorna on failing 12 times on a insignificant river😊😊
@MTTT12345 күн бұрын
Not really an idiot, but more of an arogant fool, was Augustus Adolphus of Sweden, who was killed because he refused to wear glasses. During a battle he lost sight of his own troops and rode on his horse towards what he assumed were friendly soldiers. They were not.
@Scavneger7765 күн бұрын
100% he was a very good leader that just made a fatal mistake that cost of him his life and more.
@simpro17564 күн бұрын
To be fair, glasses with corrective lenses were just appearing at the time meaning he probably wouldn't have access to them and glasses before that were just not worth the risk of loosing your eyes if they broke during battle.
@Divano-qw2sb4 күн бұрын
He also did not wear his armor during that battle.
@jimqatnt3 күн бұрын
I was taught that it was because of a thick fog that rolled in that made him get lost and accidentally ride into enemy lines.
@zero1zerolast3933 күн бұрын
Guy sounds near sighted
@robertdacquisto68715 күн бұрын
“Wheel him to the deck for a better view”, man they don’t make em like FDR anymore.
@dunbar9finger3 күн бұрын
Well if the threat to your life is that a torpedo might be hitting the ship you are on, up on deck is probably safer than inside. Going overboard and treading water until rescued is probably a better strategy for him than being stuck inside a room he can't get out of. He did a lot of swimming after his legs stopped working as a means of getting at least some type of exercise in.
@sergiojuanmembiela62232 күн бұрын
To put things in perspective, I cannot think of any dreadnought that was sunk by a single torpedo hit. I mean, had the torpedo hit, it was not funny business and probably many men could have died. But it would have been very unlikely that the ship would have been sunk. And even in that case it was probably safe to assume that FDR could have been safely evacuated in a raft.
@Manco652 күн бұрын
If it was like most of the torpedoes we had at that time built by the lowest bidder it probably wouldn't have went off anyway.
@SavageGreywolf2 күн бұрын
@@Manco65 All torpedo ordnance during WWII was designed by the Naval Undersea Warfare Center and manufactured at government ordnance plants. The Mark 14 torpedo had some design flaws, but it was not because it was 'built by the lowest bidder', it was because of the technology at the time.
@timothyjburton2 күн бұрын
I mean getting shot in the ear and standing up and yelling, "Fight Fight Fight"! is pretty Bravo Alpha.
@nizaralsaidi42795 күн бұрын
Letting soldiers take their families with them on a large-scale suicide mission is just peak idiocracy.
@fiyahquacker28355 күн бұрын
1863 Civil War watchouts in a nutshell.
@Sorcerers_Apprentice5 күн бұрын
Camp followers were common practice in pre-industrial wars. They took care of logistics - foraging/preparing food, repairing clothes/weapons/shoes, medical care, etc. The Romans also had relatively good relations with the Germanic tribes in the area at the time, they thought they were still in friendly territory.
@standardgigachad32975 күн бұрын
Idiocy***
@critter300020014 күн бұрын
All major nations did that back then. Look up the Briton’s revolt. They did the same thing when facing the Romans. Modern logistics did not exist back then. So having servants and families along allowed for maintenance and support for the Soldiers.
@collaborisgaming21904 күн бұрын
Boudica did that and Lost 200,000 to 10,000 Romans trapped in a Ravine, in a Battle that would have made Nero Withdraw from Britannia if she Won.
@c.w.johnsonjr63744 күн бұрын
Stalin firing all his best generals right before Hitler invaded Russia deserves a mention.
@wildbill69763 күн бұрын
"firing"... that's one way to put it... he had 90% of his military leadership killed...
@albertwolanski76882 күн бұрын
How could he know Germany will invade him?
@nirghall24582 күн бұрын
Tuchachevsky's conspiracy. Google it idk
@elessartelcontar9415Күн бұрын
Yeah, 'firing'; that's kinda accurate he had them shot. 900 officers in total.
@pascalpaps3139Күн бұрын
Stalin did that in 1937, Hitler invaded in 1941. 4 years is not exactly what i would call "right before". And those generals were plotting treason against Stalin so in that context it was a good decision. Besides..did Russia ever really had good generals? Zhukov is bassicaly the only Russian general that anyone can think of and even he won his battles by throwing waves and waves of cannonfodder against the Germans.
@jokodihaynes4195 күн бұрын
"I'm surrounded by idiots"-Scar The Lion King
@Scrapyard24c5 күн бұрын
"I've got morons on my team!" - Megatron, Transformers Generation 1
@TheOneManWhoBeatYou5 күн бұрын
"I'm surrounded by assholes!" -Dark Helmet, Spaceballs
@NicoBabyman15 күн бұрын
@@TheOneManWhoBeatYou “Keep firing, Assholes!”
@ShadowMark3_5 күн бұрын
I thought you were surrounded by gumdrops and ice cream!
@brunozeigerts63794 күн бұрын
@@Scrapyard24c Actually, I thought that was Strother Martin in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.
@indianajones43215 күн бұрын
For the military: Luigi Cadorna and Conrad Von Hötzendorf In general: The Politicians
@aleksandarvil57185 күн бұрын
Muhammad II of Kwarazm AND Francisco Solano Lopez are in BOTH categories!!!
@GageEsterly-us7xm5 күн бұрын
Hotzendorf is largely to blame for WW1
@hernanuliana91112 күн бұрын
Like Churchill, Roosvelt and Stalin?
@GageEsterly-us7xmКүн бұрын
@@hernanuliana9111 that would be ww2...
@noHarmony14 күн бұрын
I kinda expected Konrad von Hötzendorf to be on this list, but when I saw Cadorna being there I remembered "Oh yeah, there was that one guy that made him look almost competent" XD
@Ccdddttt5 күн бұрын
90% is crazy but at least he died in battle and not hiding inside a bunker.
@fiyahquacker28355 күн бұрын
That kinda feels like put how good he is from 1 to 1.01
@tylerredforge55635 күн бұрын
@@fiyahquacker2835 truuuu lulllll
@PohEnYuDariusBsss5 күн бұрын
Then again bunkers didn't really exist at the time
@SymphonyZach4 күн бұрын
@@PohEnYuDariusBssstrue but caves did and fortresses kinda do the same idea
@PohEnYuDariusBsss4 күн бұрын
@@SymphonyZach fair point
@cutlassken61945 күн бұрын
Varus! Oh Quinctilius Varus! Give me back my legions!
@drankjehierdrankjedaar38225 күн бұрын
Damn varus
@lantruongtuan5824 күн бұрын
"Armenius? A traitor? I think not"
@darth_yoda3 күн бұрын
What they kinda forget to include is the reason WHY Varus trusted Armenius he might have grown up as a hostage but he had through LONG serviced shown him self as a loyal soldier of Rome through many campaigns so when warned by a stranger whom would you trust? The man whom have fought at your side for years and even saved your life a number of times. OR the stranger whom come in and tell you that he is a traitor?
@flamethefirefox90065 күн бұрын
I'm surprised you didn't include U.S. General George A. Custer, considering the fact that he was a glory seeking egotist.
@commonsenseking63865 күн бұрын
Yeah, or Santa Ana. Even Crassus, who just defeated Spartacus but met his end with the Parthian Empire. He was a very wealthy man it is like the owners of Tesla, Facebook, and Microsoft were given an army to do due battle.
@AutismTakesOn5 күн бұрын
Well, at least Custer was never president and did some good work in the American Civil War before.... That
@thomassabino135 күн бұрын
Yeah you're clearly no history major lol pipe down
@IsaiahRichards6925 күн бұрын
Francisco Solano Lopez doesn’t belong on this list! He had a smaller, more elite force than Argentina and Brazil and his plan, on paper, was sound. Also, he suffered regular casualties for the time period but is seen as a butcher because Paraguay already had a small population!
@flamethefirefox90065 күн бұрын
@@thomassabino13 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@sankyu39505 күн бұрын
Atleast they didnt comitted martial law at 3am
@cowboys254895 күн бұрын
Oh give it time the day is still young
@gabrielc78615 күн бұрын
South korea moment
@corporatejones91264 күн бұрын
I agreed!
@brandonhorwath63513 күн бұрын
At least they knew how to use language properly...
@knightingale98335 күн бұрын
Who was more stupid though, Cadorna or the people who took two whole years to relieve him 🤔
@skyripper28375 күн бұрын
Tbf 2 years is a reasonable amount of time to judge someone's ruling. Considering, you probably wouldn't want to deal with putting down rebellions in a middle of war.
@dallasjonpaulgrove5474 күн бұрын
Cadorna was a General made by political friends in Rome, so he was first and foremost a Roman politician. A lot of people wanted him to stay in command just a bit longer in the hopes to prove that they were not incompetent for putting him in the position, much less about proving Cadorna's competency. The series of Isonzo was THE prime example of what not to do as a commander, he kept pressing his men into the same area that was getting increasingly difficult to push due to the ever-strengthening defenses. Also because Cadorna believed Trench warfare was cowardice he very rarely ever allowed the construction or entrenchments of proper defenses. It wasn't until Diaz came into command that the Italian front was finally stabilized and the Italians actually managed to preform so much more efficiently being able to use elastic defensive tactics and proper fortifications. Diaz basically put the life of an Italian soldier to hold more worth than Cadorna ever could.
@petergray27123 күн бұрын
The Italian political class was clueless about war. The general they sent to conquer Abyssinia in 1896, Oreste Baratieri, did a good job wearing down the numerically superior Abyssinian forces through a Fabian strategy, but the politicans demanded he fight and win a glorious victory so they would look good to the voters. Instead, he waged the most disastrous battle ever for a European army in Africa, the Battle of Adwa, losing 11,000 out of 17,000 men. Abyssinia would remain free from European colonialism until 1936 as a result. And if you think a Fascist would do better than these inept democrats, let's talk about Mussolini's shitshow during WW2.
@sergiojuanmembiela62232 күн бұрын
Not stupidity, but: * You do not want to fire generals just because of lost battles. Sometimes battles cannot just be won. And sometimes even mediocre generals win battles through numbers and luck. Certainly a defeat should cause some concern and research, but then the people at the top would have been given information from Cadorna and his entourage. * It is not that other countries'offensives in the war were doing great, either. It was assumed that the defendant would have massive advantages. * And, even after you have realized the man is stupid, firing him reflects poorly on those who chose it. So they may try just to "wait a little more" to see if something changes and there is a victory that validates the choice, or even provides for an opportunity for replacing him without linking to his incompetence ("due to health reasons the General has asked to be granted leave.")
@tov.zheleznyakov74942 күн бұрын
What's your problem??!! That was a decision of the king, it was not democratic or something
@corymorimacori10595 күн бұрын
Theodore Roosevelt: You should be ashamed of your military honor!
@VivaLaEdits5 күн бұрын
👏
@cowboys254895 күн бұрын
I won't find a better comment today this is it for sure....has never rolling ima go back and rewatch it
@wnc11295 күн бұрын
"Everyone know you were back home saying Thank God for Pearl Hahbar!"
@ExtantPerson5 күн бұрын
You comment this on every video, and on this one it fits perfectly. I admire the perseverance.
@aaronfield78995 күн бұрын
Did he really say that?
@goldosprey5 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="673">11:13</a> I love the fact that even when the Mongols were bloodthirty, they weren't shy to use a pen. Which makes the dumbass emperor killing their messenger even dumber
@CM266175 күн бұрын
Well, if there ever was a real-life case for 'Never kill the messenger' ...
@Taistelukalkkuna5 күн бұрын
They needed to have excuse to invade. Shah provided it.
@TheEmolano5 күн бұрын
Fun fact: Brazil and Argentina went to war multiple times over Uruguay before Paraguay decided to piss both of them. After that both countries never fought angain. Solano should at least have waited until the next war before atacking one of the larger countries.
@BensonCaisip5 күн бұрын
To this day, Varus still hasn't given back his 3 Legions.
@nematolvajkergetok51044 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1110">18:30</a> The battle of Caporetto was so terrible that even today, "una Caporetto" is used as an idiom for an unmitigated, terrible disaster in Italian language. Interestingly, Hungarians also have a similar, yet less common idiom, "a Doberdo" to a terrible mess or chaos, referring to another WW1 battle with Italy.
@Gideon02155 күн бұрын
Honorable mention-Sir William Elphinstone
@isauldron43374 күн бұрын
Genghis khan when his trade offerers get massacred: Come on let's try again King: kills the diplomat Genshin khan: so you have chosen death
@michealklondike40492 күн бұрын
Which is fair enough. The king was just being an A-hole at that point. They could have negotiated something 💀
@magnusm417 сағат бұрын
There's also the british noble who sent one of the most infamous awful orders in a letter now presented at a museum. He basically pointed up on a hill and said: Attack the cannons. Not realizing the men below couldn't see the enemy. And had the letter sent of the order. They marched straight into cannon fire on all three sides. He of course, blamed it on the one who wrote the letter for him.
“Don’t shoot we’re republicans!” Other ships in the Pacific fleet to the “Willie D”
@Tripact_of_fire5 күн бұрын
Immediately when i saw the name of Varus i said oh no. "Quinctilius Varus give me back my legions"
@kirgan10003 күн бұрын
It was a crunching defeat, but if you was in Varus situation, why wouldn't you trust a senior Roman-Germanic auxiliary pathfinder/scout leader, and his men, that served Rome faithful during 15 years time, with a excellent track record. Shall you carry out a campaign, without pathfinders/scouts with local knowledge?
@Tripact_of_fire3 күн бұрын
@kirgan1000 one word "Germanic"
@kirgan10003 күн бұрын
@@Tripact_of_fire Rome have loots of auxiliary Cohorts, even the Emperor have a Germanic bodyguard. So your plane is to carry out the campaign, without pathfinders/scouts with local knowledge?
@Tripact_of_fire3 күн бұрын
@@kirgan1000 i know but i think it was a mistake to do so
@knightingale98335 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="790">13:10</a> low end estimate indeed, I’ve heard the population of modern day Iran is still lower than it was before Ghengis Khan invaded
@Horologist-zu5vq4 күн бұрын
Good.
@micg72824 күн бұрын
It is I think. Not to mention that all the advances in science, medicine and philosophy was lost. They put them back in the Stone Age. And the Middle East never really recovered.
@DuckAllMighty20 сағат бұрын
@@micg7282 I always see this advancement in science, medicine and philosophy, so what did they bring to the table, that the Greeks already hadn't thought of 2000 years prior? I'll give the middle east the idea of the telescope, but that's pretty much it.
@SirAsdf5 күн бұрын
From what I remember from the Sam O'Nella video about the USS Porter, the entire ship's crew was utterly incompetent.
@GuyIncognito-1113 күн бұрын
That whole ship was a comedy of errors
@zp6riКүн бұрын
that ship was just straight cursed.
@casualobserver51833 күн бұрын
Dude, you did Varus dirty 😂. Varus was a reasonable competent administrator and general. The terrible reality is that there were many commanders it could have happened to.
@dude123nice6Күн бұрын
This is just a poorly researched clickbait piece.
@time_warriors5 күн бұрын
The way history and animation are combined is brilliant, and the storytelling keeps you hooked until the very end. Thank you for making history this exciting! 🏛🔥good job man
@Goc4ever5 күн бұрын
I agree Simple History, in war there are heroes and fools and these guys fit the the latter category.
@arthurcardozo53693 күн бұрын
Brazil did not exactly invade Uruguay, Emperor Pedro II supported the Colorados in the civil war and Solano Lopez supported the Blancos. The Colorados won and joined the Triple Alliance due to a debt with Brazil.
@SwattyBoiPlays5 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="221">3:41</a> bro stood up for the torpedo man dawson
@blackfox74485 күн бұрын
I mean to be fair, he did order to make the simulation that eventually lead to the accidental firing of a live torpedo so i guess he felt somewhat responsible xD
@seanmueller71255 күн бұрын
Ngl, surprised Custer didn't make it on this list for his idiocy at Little Big Horn 😅
@inisipisTV5 күн бұрын
In truth Custer was one the Union army most skilled commanders winning lots of battles. In the war against the Indians, Custer pushed for diplomacy and integration than outright hostility, but was overruled by the War office. In Little Big Horn, Col. Custer was leading the initial patrol group when he got surrounded by Sitting Bulls forces. He was expecting the main US Union forces down the hill to come and releave his trapped forces, as was planned, but the commanding General opt to stay put and sent a smaller group to try to rescue Custer, obviously it failed. Custer then ordered his remaining troops to try to break through from the encirclment and reach the main Army group. Only one survived.
@FinnishDragon3 күн бұрын
I would add British general William George Keith Elphinstone and his adventure to Kabul during 19th century to this list.
@lygames_10274 күн бұрын
Uruguay was having a civil war, brazil intervened after rumours of brazillians being targeted by one of the sides, they didnt invade uruguay Then Solano invaded brazil and tried to send his troops to uruguay via argentina to help his allied side of the uruguayan civil war
@VinlaandКүн бұрын
Uruguay was NOT having a civil war. Brazil provided support to a uruguayan general to start one, due to Uruguay trying to leave Brazil's sphere of influence. The rest is correct.
@lygames_1027Күн бұрын
@Vinlaand how so? What about the blancos vs colorados? It was a political unrest that then turned into a civil war. In wich Brazil supported the colorados... While Solano the blancos. He invaded Brazil becaused he feared that if the colorados won, uruguay would stop giving paraguay access to the sea by the plata river
@lauratomaszewski79425 күн бұрын
The thumbnail is truly amazing
@peterwhite64155 күн бұрын
The Dawnson I think can be excused due to it being an acident and atempting to fix his mistake, but hes still an idiot. Everyone else on this list? Absolutly pathetic and infuriating, to the point they activly dont seem to think on the posisble consequences.
@Scrapyard24c4 күн бұрын
Well, the William D. Porter is often referred to as one of the most incompetent ships in US Navy history for a reason as the torpedo incident wasn't the only one the crew was responsible for. When the Porter first left port to join in the Iowa's escort, the crew failed to raise anchor properly and ended up causing severe damage to the ship next to them. Later on, an unsecured depthcharge rolled off the deck and exploded, scaring the other three ships into taking evasive action before the Porter broke radio silence (this was before the torpedo) in order to tell the rest of the fleet what happened. The William D. Porter would eventually be partially responsible for its own demise. During the Battle of Okinawa, the Porter shot down a Japanese Kamikaze plane and ended up sailing right over the wreck, which then exploded. The damage would cause the Porter to sink around 3 hours later.
@bkjeong43023 күн бұрын
@@Scrapyard24c Actually, only the torpedo incident and her sinking actually happened; the rest are 1990s fabrications.
@notreallymyname37363 күн бұрын
Luigi Cadorna wasn't a great general; but at least his brother Mario was a very successful plumber.
@jagmarc3 күн бұрын
Paraguay had lost 90% male population. Maybe Hxmas 2023 should be a mention, though the good news is the population of Gaza had actually INCREASED by 2% since 10-7 !
@jacobzehner20045 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="226">3:46</a> A man unimaginative martinet who was ruthless with his troops and dismissive of his country's political authorities.
@jokodihaynes4195 күн бұрын
"Fool of a took"-Gadalf the white
@TrevDri5 күн бұрын
Thought he was grey at that point.
@littleblackcat22735 күн бұрын
@@TrevDri ... well, everyone's hair changes as they get older.
@DOOM_Dwarf4 күн бұрын
Guys give Gadalfs hair a break.
@TrevDri4 күн бұрын
@@littleblackcat2273 yea but your name usually doesn't thats pretty unique.
@rensienator2 күн бұрын
Bedankt
@Hathur5 күн бұрын
Correction: Longbows did NOT exist during the Roman Empire. It was a Medieval era invention (about 1,200 years after Publius was even born). The best bow during the Roman Empire was the composite bow... considerably shorter range than the medieval longbow. In fact, Roman Legions rarely used bows at all and Publius would not have had many at all in his ranks, if any. The pilum and javelin were the preferred ranged weapon of Roman Legions in his time.
@jffry8905 күн бұрын
Slings outranged bows anyways.
@lawrenceofarabia92195 күн бұрын
The Romans had auxiliaries (non-citizen soldiers) who served as archers.
@Taistelukalkkuna5 күн бұрын
If you are talking about Welsh Longbow, maybe yes. But bows have existed thousands of years. See Holmegaard Bow for example. You are correct that bow was not standard weapon in legions, yet.
@Hathur4 күн бұрын
@@Taistelukalkkuna I referred specifically to the "Longbow". Historically they don't exist until around 633AD (Welsh) and not become more wide spread across some parts of Europe until 1,200 AD. Bows prior to that were short bows, composite bows, self bows, etc - all of which were substantially shorter in range than the earliest Welsh longbow and had drastically less armor penetration due to draw strength. Rome had NO longbows as this video stated. They had composite bows at best and archers comprised less than 5% of a typical Legion (Rome was still mostly using Pilums and Javelins for ranged combat as it was built into their tactics and formations. Archers were usually not legion soldiers themselves but mercenaries / peasants etc and were exceedingly uncommon at this point in history for Rome. It would be another 110 years before Rome began utilizing bowmen as a larger part of their army than they do here). It's important to differentiate because the Longbow is closer in time to history to Muskets (separated by only 500 to 600 years) vs 2,000+ years for Rome's composite, recurve and self bows at this time in history. The longbow to a Roman would've been almost as far fetched as the musket would've been, considering even their "artillery" mangonels would've struggled to match the range of a longbow.
@kenneth98743 күн бұрын
Composite bows outrange longbows
@HammerJammer815 күн бұрын
LMAO .. The animation for the first "Idiot" ... hahahaha
@rafaellorentz65924 күн бұрын
Even if some people say the estimate of Paraguayan loss is too much to believe,the minimum estimates of population lost ( in general, not only male) was around 30% , with most of it being male. To put into perspective, is a percentage bigger than the population loss of Germany and the Soviet Union combined in the Second World War. And remember, it was a xix century war. No machine guns, no air strikes. Just muskets, cannons and good old cholera and malaria casualties.
@rpower14015 күн бұрын
How did a guy who just missed the arming device on one of three torpedoes (and maybe a few other things) end up on a list with these far greater disaster makers? I'm not sure which side is to be insulted by the combination, but somebody is being snubbed!
@KingOfStopMotion4 күн бұрын
Respect to Segesties for trying to warn the Romans. A lot of Romans could've been saved and 3 Legions could've survived if not for Varros.
@llucas.M.O5 күн бұрын
Just for the Record. The lance that hurted "El supremo" was The lance of a brazilian soldier called "Chico Diabo" (Chico the Devil).
@AirJoe5 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="429">7:09</a> I'd like to imagine he actually ran away like that 😂
@dallinn91645 күн бұрын
"There's a torpedo coming!" FDR: "My time has come."
@junedhussain62524 күн бұрын
Thank you Simple History for all your hard work. This is one of my favourite videos. As always wars can bring the stupidity out of people even Today. Keep up the good work Simple History.
@ll_Chaos_ll3 күн бұрын
I'm not sure if anyone tells you this but man your thumbnails are getting better and better, Makes me laugh everytime a new vid comes out.
@KyleShiflet136665 күн бұрын
You need to do a solo episode on "The Willie D"
@michaelaustin3345 күн бұрын
Cracked already did it. Not a video hillarious.
@TheyCallMeDio4 күн бұрын
Sam O'Nella did a video about it
@ericlathan61784 күн бұрын
I really hate that “definition” of insanity, is that what you do when you practice something??
@kenneth98743 күн бұрын
Yes, but you don't expect different results.....
@ben97245 күн бұрын
Should do a video about the most intelligent soldiers. I pretty sure that Canadian soldier Arthur Currie would be there since he studied the battlefields to limit the losses
@Cheeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee4 күн бұрын
The ONE thing I will say about Lopez is that at least he fought to the end and died with his men.
@Grumpyburger05 күн бұрын
Nice 👌 you never disappoint us
@simonesilvestri73413 күн бұрын
Just few word in defence of Cadorna: 1) The Isonzo is 1 of the 2 passages throug the Alps, the second one were too tight for an army passage 2) On that front were the strongest, so make sense to attack the enemy in the only place just that large to support a campaign battle 3) Cadorna use the same strategy that every WW1 general uses (frontal attack with artillery), what other strategy he can use. With that im not defending Cadorna, but i want to show to you that, yes is cruel, very cruel, but is not entirely his fault.
@BaxterAndLunala5 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="367">6:07</a>: Is it any wonder why anyone would quote Vaas? He's one of the most iconic video game villains ever, up there with the likes of Senator Armstrong and Handsome Jack.
@skrahnha5 күн бұрын
Bro, the quote is way older than that game. It was even (most likely falsely) attributed to Einstein.
@joshcompton16934 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="719">11:59</a> “not unreasonable” Genghis Khan literally sent them a diplomat that said give up your sovereignty you king and he’s supposed to do that. You don’t understand what a king is
@Rotionu3 күн бұрын
Killing an ambassador has always been considered one of the hugest international crimes and an act of war declaration. From Genghis's his point of view they had it coming. After the mob murdered Russian ambassador Griboyedov after attacking Rusiian embassy in Tehran, the Shah sent his grandson to Saint Petersburg to avoid another war with Tsar Nicholas I and gifted to the Tsar the one of his most valuable crown jewels - the Shah Diamond.
@Speleomimus2 күн бұрын
Well he followed your advice and got annihilated, is that what a king is too?
@joshcompton16932 күн бұрын
@ yes. you should never ever give up the sovereignty of a nation.
@Speleomimus2 күн бұрын
@joshcompton1693 ah yes better that everyone dies so a ruler can keep their dignity(?) What kind of insane, self-destructive philosophy is that?
@sabiant.lawson29095 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="368">6:08</a> Far Cry 3! Let's go!
@rbrice41285 күн бұрын
I love this! Thank You!
@mattiafrancesco5 күн бұрын
It’s interesting that in Italy, many squares and streets are still named after Luigi Cadorna. Historians have mixed opinions on his contributions during the war.
@Tahitilover18995 күн бұрын
Italians are terrible at war so it makes sense they still honor a idiot
@shashwatsreenivasan45055 күн бұрын
Oh man sam o nella doing the fdr torpedo one was also funny
@Snarlacc5 күн бұрын
Always surprised how accurately you portray weapons and armour of the time. Could be just generic, but they are alway modeled after reality. Plus always informative. Superbly done!
@Shaosprojects5 күн бұрын
I saw the title of this this video and I immediately thought of Luigi Cadorna I wasn’t surprised to see him in this list 😅
@HRHooChicken5 күн бұрын
What about Winston Churchill? His list of blunders is impressive
@esajuhanirintamaki9652 күн бұрын
Especially, when he suggested Gallipoli operation.
@HRHooChicken2 күн бұрын
@ yes. That nearly ended his career and he ended up as an officer on the frontline because of that. Other blunders in WW2 were Norway, Greece, Italy. He was too inept and too drunk to make any good big decisions.
@ianblake8155 күн бұрын
Also shout out to L. Ron Hubbard 😆
@seanlander93214 күн бұрын
General Dentz, he surrendered Paris to the Germans in 1940, then he surrendered Syria and Lebanon to the Australians in 1941. He was a buffoon.
@bruceanthony33573 күн бұрын
Have you noticed some of the worst idiots placed in command are "daddy's boys". They never develop strategies nor are trained under harsh conditions. Their synonymous to the coach's son being the quarterback of the team. Lose every time.
@lisalennox78355 күн бұрын
I watched one about WWll in history class today!
@Harikejn5 күн бұрын
Here are some couple of fun facts. Firstly, I'll say about Mongols two things. In Europe, Mongol Empire reached the Southern - East Europe, almost to the Danube (taking the Pannonian Plain in Balkan peninsula). Second thing is that Mongol Empire have defeated the Ottoman Empire in 15th century. Secondly, I'll say about French Empire (about the Napoleon here two things). First thing is, when he was invading Europe, he took the Dalmatia (also in Balkan peninsula). Second thing is that when the Napoleon tried to invade Russia, he firstly helped Turks with weapons, so the Turks could start to recapture territories from Serbs in 1813. Well also during the WWII when Germany was preparing to invade Yugoslavia in 1941, the Yugoslavian fighter planes and bombers had white cross with red an blue insignia. When the planes were moving Germans thought that those are their planes, no matter how does this color scheme of Yugoslavian planes was different. <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1087">18:07</a> Nicola Tesla (awesome). Next time in Simple History print, put also following people. Those are: Michelle Pupin, Michelle Petrović, and Milutin Milanković.
@mingfanzhang46005 күн бұрын
😊
@mattislindehag30655 күн бұрын
In world war one the British stoped using the union jack as the marking on their planes because it looked to similar to the german black and white iron cross. These symbols look nothing alike if you get even a halfway decent look at them... but on a moving aircraft you frequently don't. All you have time to recognize is a vague cross shape then your brain fills in the details.
@selimcardak77995 күн бұрын
Mongol empire had already collapsed by 15th century, no way they can defeat the ottomans It’s the timurids who are a Turkic empire who defeated the ottomans
@Harikejn4 күн бұрын
@@mattislindehag3065 Here is one fun fact also. Believe it or not, ever reported shooting down of an airplane from ground to air, occurred in Serbia during the WWI. Radoje Raka Ljutovac was the first soldier who shot down the enemy plane. It all occurred on 30th of September 1915, when Austria-Hungary empire sent 3 planes to bomb Kragujevac. Army used pistols, machine guns, and rifles to shoot down airplane. Then Radoje Raka Ljutovac decided to use the old Turkish cannon that was in storage, since it was there. He aimed a cannon towards the plane, an fired at it. Then the cannonball or shell hit the plane, and the plane crashed. After that Radoje Raka Ljutovac went to the crash site, and he saw 3 dead pilots there. When he saw them, he saluted to them. After that people were gathering to see what's going on. Then Serbian army told the citizens these things: Noting to see; Show's over; Go back to your daily life activities. Also Serbian air force did also bombed the Austria-Hungary in 1915, so they can stop their advance.
@lesamar86114 күн бұрын
@@selimcardak7799 The Mongols did defeat the Turks on Angora in year 1402. You can see the details about that on internet.
@Panzersoldaten5 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="228">3:48</a> yes Cadorna was a huge Baffoon. He literally tried to attack Austria in the worst places. Now if he attacked Tyrol that does bring up harder challenges due to the very poor terrain but Italy was not prepared to attack such a position on the isonzo. Cadorna could’ve possibly just waited for proper siege artillery then do anything but a frontal assault. One of his generals Armando Diaz and his army was the only one to make progress in the isonzo river battles but Diaz was able to bring victory
@mirceazaharia20945 күн бұрын
I'm pretty sure I played a similar battle in Battlefield 1. It was a tough fight... Damn you, Cadorna!
@GPDermawan5 күн бұрын
More like Italian idiot general
@niceofgames19 сағат бұрын
My grandpa said it best: “Insanity is doing something repeatedly and expecting a different result. Stupidity is doing the same thing repeatedly and then being SURPRISED when you get the same result.”
@emmaccode3 күн бұрын
I am thankful for you, SimpleHistory. Never would've learned that first one if you hadn't told me.
@Lemmiwinks_The_Gerbil_King2 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="570">9:30</a> average german win <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="675">11:15</a> smartest Muhammed
@txgunguy27664 күн бұрын
There's also Colonel Johann Rahl, commander of the Hessian troops at the Battle of Trenton, NJ, on December 26th, 1776. Prior to the battle, a Loyalist sent Rahl a note informing him of Washington's impending attack on the Hessians at Trenton. However, Rahl couldn't read it since it was in english, and Rahl REFUSED TO INTERRUPT HIS CARD GAME to find somebody to read it to him. After Colonel Rahl died from mortal wounds relieved in the battle, the note was found still in his pocket.
@marleegould5423 күн бұрын
The whole career of the William D. Porter is hilarious, I highly recommend watching the many videos people have made about it. It was simultaneously the unluckiest and luckiest ship in the Navy.
I wish I was lucky enough to be a famous military idiot
@conradovillegasalvarado63924 күн бұрын
Love the backgrounds for the Cardona part based off the Isonzo game!
@brunozeigerts63794 күн бұрын
I have a book about great military blunders. One of the chapters was 'Unfit to command.' It included MacArthur, General Buller(the idiot in charge of the British army at Spion Kop) and others.
@angrydoggo716018 сағат бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="101">1:41</a> "Say. You guys remembered to remove the primers from the torpedoes, right?" "Yep." "Yes sir." *Eating glue.* "What?" "FFFFFFFFFFFFF"
@justinhadley25832 күн бұрын
Those artists did phenomenal work on all the drool in this episode.
@TridentAminations3 күн бұрын
that luigi general is the perfect example of the sentence “so stupid even your enemy concerns”
@luigiduca21 сағат бұрын
Actually the ene.y hastingly mounted a counteroffensive subordinating itself completely to the germans necause they had come to a braking point.
@rtyrsson2 күн бұрын
When I saw "Biggest idiots in war" I expected it to be far longer than eighteen and a half minutes. History is replete with them.
@alexandergausJTP2 күн бұрын
Yeah, the fight in teutoburg forest was quite something. As a child a friend of mine found some rusty scrap metal. We did hike there often aside the larger trails. Sometimes deep into the forest where no way was and we did imagine we found rare Roman stuff like helmets and so on. We really had fun.
@alexandergausJTP2 күн бұрын
Also: Games of thrones killed that one fella Mongols style. That's the correct order. We don't want to take anything away from the Mongols fame, do we? Maybe at some point in our existence we meet them and they are way too much into revenge for my taste ..
@a.m.71654 күн бұрын
Pointing your pistol at a torpedo seems desperate but it's better than doing nothing. There is a microscopic chance you might achieve something.
@MikeStar20002 күн бұрын
I love how Dawson was drooling all the time 😂
@Lion7182 күн бұрын
Another BS video... Despite the many tropes and stereotypes surrounding World War I, the Italian army actually won 8 of the 11 battles of the Isonzo (compared to only 1 Austrian victory and 2 inconclusive), made some important advances, and won the war, soundly defeating the Austro-Hungarian army in the two major battles of Second Piave and Vittorio Veneto, which directly caused the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The idea that the Italian army “attacked the same river 11 times” is a canard which demonstrates ignorance concerning the Italian Front. This was alpine warfare, conducted in the high mountains and on plateaus, in the most difficult climate and harshest terrain of the entire war - it had nothing to do with a river. The reason why the battles of the Isonzo were in this location is because it was the only place where an offensive attack could be launched with the hope of breaking through the Austrian defenses and advancing. Austria controlled all the key alpine passes and held the defensive advantage. The Isonzo valley was the only location suitable for large-scale military operations. Furthermore, the Isonzo valley led to the Gorizia bridgehead and the stronghold of Tolmino, and more importantly led to Mount Hermada, which was the main Austrian defensive line blocking the road to Trieste. There was no other way to reach Trieste except by completely destroying the city by attacking it from the port (guarded by the Austro-Hungarian Navy). Note also that the Isonzo valley is 138 km long, and the 11 battles took place across this very long stretch of territory; they did not merely fight 11 battles in the same exact location. The battles involved different armies, in different locations, mostly in the mountains. Numerous battles between the two countries took place also in other sectors (see the White War, which Italy also won), but they were not major focuses of operation, precisely because the war could not be decisively won in those areas and did not lead to any strategically important strongholds. In order to understand the strategy and objectives, one needs to first understand the geography and terrain of the Eastern Alps. When focusing on the number of battles, perhaps many people do not realize that there were actually five battles of Ypres. Perhaps they also are not aware that between July and November 1916 there were no less than fourteen battles of the Somme, which resulted in the loss of over 1 million men in only 5 months while advancing only 10 km. Historiography has arbitrarily decided to speak of the Somme as if it were a singular battle, but in reality there were even more battles of the Somme than there were of the Isonzo. Moreover, the battles of the Somme resulted in a greater loss of life in a much briefer amount of time, and with less gains to show for it. And this is not the only example. Yet, for some reason, the various armchair generals do not think to highlight the supposed ‘incompetence’ and absurdity of “attacking the same line 14 times and hoping for a different result”, nor do they speak of any other military with the same mocking or condescending tone. Such post-factum criticism is evidently reserved only for Italy, as if every other country were not similarly engaged in trench warfare with soldiers and officers falling by the millions for a mere few kilometers of territory.
@hooks463816 сағат бұрын
In regards to FDR and that narrow miss. You should research the boat that the torpedo was launched from. That particular boat, not necessarily the crew just the hull, has an interesting history. It's involved in A LOT of unlucky events. When I find the video or article that covers its story I will post it at a reply to this.
@GuukanKitsune2 күн бұрын
...the Willie D Porter... yeah. Everyone, just... read up on that ship. The torpedo incident was just ONE of its many famous blunders. It is an INFAMOUS ship for sure.
@johnmcvey42435 күн бұрын
Im surprised general santa anna isnt on here.
@Hauggyful12 сағат бұрын
Guess Roosevelt was lucky US torpedoes were utterly useless for a good portion of the war.