God bless you man Haven’t seen a better explanation in my life. Love you man
@anneupp94216 жыл бұрын
I loved how you explained this topic so simply, very graceful
@MrRumblefrog4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaining where this came from, other videos simply chuck this formula at you and doesn't explain why you use it and just take it for granted.
@JasonConner849 жыл бұрын
This was absolutely perfect. I understood how to use Simpson's Rule but, until this video, I couldn't understand how we could possibly take the area under a curve by taking the area under a finite but greater number of curves. Anyway, thanks so much!
@Josiah_Cornett9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for making this video!! I was trying to decipher my books derivation, and it wasn't making sense, but this cleared it up!! Much appreciated
@mich60107 жыл бұрын
Better explanation than most! Well done Patrick!
@calambuhayjr.josevirgiliog20943 жыл бұрын
If not for these kind of videos on youtube, I won't be a top student. I owe you all my grades
@duchieu0833 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. I find this video very helpful and easy to understand the Simpson's rule. Keep it up dude, very appreciate it!
@karthikr79567 жыл бұрын
It really helps to know where this long formulas suddenly jumps to mathematics, great thank you.
@abdelrahmangamalmahdy11 жыл бұрын
FROM EAST TO WAST U R THE BEST
@jayant91516 жыл бұрын
West*
@insidetrip1018 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I am reworking through my calculus book, and my book just kinda gives you the formula and doesn't even make an attempt to prove it for any reason, and I was completely lost as to even where to start. I tried doing some of this stuff, but namely I got stuck because I didn't make the observation that the definite integral -h to h of bx would always be 0. If I had seen that I wouldn't have been so frustrated. Pretty embarrassing I wasn't able to see that >.>
@ulquiorrashinigami11 жыл бұрын
I just had my numerical methods exam last friday, this would have helped me a ton :(
@jonathanblack59404 жыл бұрын
It's great to know where the seemingly arbitrary 1, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 1 thing comes from. Thanks!
@kushalsharma7073 жыл бұрын
Her from Dukes lesson
@louispender93473 жыл бұрын
same lad
@rawansaif704411 жыл бұрын
Awesome as always .. the best teacher I've Ever had !
@thomasledgerwood96439 жыл бұрын
Great video! Just a note, It works really well, but only describes the case where odd pieces are parabolic stationary points - it doesn't have to be that case, and you can kind of get the maths to describe that from this, but it would be more complete to include that. Sorry for the pedantism :P
@lostlatinlover8 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation Patrick! As a tutor this is a great help.
@whiteboarddude35664 жыл бұрын
This explanation is super crazy AWESOME. thank you so much
@user-kt3mb8ug8r3 жыл бұрын
Loved this man…..
@won20529jun4 жыл бұрын
Wow, amazing!!! You make it so clear
@mariobaeza81145 жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful explanation!!!
@mitchellschoenbrun9 жыл бұрын
Marvelous, simply marvelous
@ltroop3437 жыл бұрын
Bless you Thank you so much for your videos
@fourierbird10 жыл бұрын
at 8:00, why do you multiply y1 by 4? What is the "clever observation?"
@benitokestelman454510 жыл бұрын
There is a reason! Once you have the equations: yo = Ah^2 - Bh + C y1 = C y2 = Ah^2 + Bh + C Notice that yo can be added to y2 to eliminate Bh: yo + y2 = 2Ah^2 + 2C And the area beneath the curve is: x/3(2Ax^2 + 6C) So if we want to express this area in terms of yo, y1, and y2, we have to find where we can substitute them. Immediately, we can replace 2Ax^2 + 2C: x/3(yo + y2 + 4C) And C = y1. Therefore: Area under curve = x/3(yo + y2 + 4y1)
@FAHayekSays9 жыл бұрын
Ur dumb
@sreyasingh37558 жыл бұрын
+Benito Kestelman Aha, thank you!! I have also been trying to figure out why 4 was used and you have explained it very well!! :D
@mimiarina94256 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for this video! It really helps
@mastermime10006 жыл бұрын
Thanks man! Awesome proof vid!
@nikkiactub11 жыл бұрын
Patrick do you have any bernoulli differential equation tutorial? I stick with you because you really teach very well.
@patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын
no, not at the moment, sorry
@tahsintahsinuzzaman7812 жыл бұрын
Bruh, that took a while. Now I know why the professor didn't bother showing this in the lecture lol
@andyapi422 жыл бұрын
Hello one question , in y0 +4y1 +y2 , where did the 4 come from? thankyou
@andyapi422 жыл бұрын
minute 8
@zaidan567 жыл бұрын
I am not comfortable when you set y0+4y1+y2 = the area expression. I don't see the rationale or physical/mathematical connection by doing so.
@davidlee81668 жыл бұрын
awesome! this really helps me!
@DarkNinjaStudent9 жыл бұрын
I have a question, perhaps a stupid one. Since we can shift the function in any way we like without a change of area, in order to make it symmetric about the y-axis, how can y_2 for the first parabola be the same as the y_2 for the second parabola? Wouldn't the shifts required for the two parabolas to be symmetric about the y-axis be different? Thanks :)
@RajeshKumar-rg5lf9 жыл бұрын
is this possible if the upper limit is smaller than the lower limit?
@1manband2211 жыл бұрын
wow! so helpful! thanx Patrick! :)
@jayjayf96994 жыл бұрын
Wait so you use integration to compute the approximation of the the integral seems abit like chicken and egg
@rafaelmelo25768 жыл бұрын
Just a question, isn't the simple formula of Simpson in the form "((a-b))/6)(y0+4y1+y2)"? (With (a-b)=h*n, being a the beginnig point, b the last, and n the number of equal devisions of that intertval.)
@SniperMonkeh8 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's (a-b)/6 but (a-b)/3 because you don't know delta x yet(h).
@melannieruiz42598 жыл бұрын
im a little confused, if you had n=2 how would you solve? would it be f(x)+4F(x1)+f(x2)???
@SuperMerlin1008 жыл бұрын
"im a little confused, if you had n=2 how would you solve? would it be f(x)+4F(x1)+f(x2)???" Yes.
@nelsonwetmore11 жыл бұрын
YAY Numerical methods!!! plz make all the ones you can think of.
@alexandredamiao13658 жыл бұрын
Nice video! Thanks!
@tshidzolinda91211 жыл бұрын
is it possible that you do a video on diagonilization of a 3*3 matrix
@VictorE10308 жыл бұрын
why does the rule only work if the number of parabolas is even?
@derek37198 жыл бұрын
This looks like a helpful video, but it keeps pausing. I thought it might be my computer, but had the same problem at the library. Is there any way to fix this?
@BSplitt8 жыл бұрын
I think it's the computer or internet connection. I have no such issue.
@halhauder7911 жыл бұрын
Hi Patrick . how best to prepare for last year college maths exam.
@patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын
works lots of old practice tests if they have them.
@patrickjmt11 жыл бұрын
and i would ask someone at your actual school; it is hard for me to say
@roaahedaya17797 жыл бұрын
That's awesome 😊👌👌
@nickcochran634311 жыл бұрын
It's so beautiful!
@alwayslovelbjkyle64302 жыл бұрын
thats brilliant
@thejspace3027 жыл бұрын
Why do we multiply Y_1 by 4 in Y_o + 4Y_1 +Y_2?
@TheWolfXCIX4 жыл бұрын
You are amazing
@djmpvae2709197811 жыл бұрын
How many rules are in the math problems? Cool vid.
@qinisombulawa7276 жыл бұрын
It's only about 6000 Math rules we have in Mathematics
@sadbutitstrue23235 жыл бұрын
@@qinisombulawa727 beautifully created
@11crazykitties8 жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@ChechoColombia15 жыл бұрын
Is There a geometrical explanation?
@patrickjmt5 жыл бұрын
yes
@ChechoColombia15 жыл бұрын
patrickJMT do you know where to find it? By the way if found your explanation really helpful
@alphamega33067 жыл бұрын
Great video! I just want to add, though, I believe that the parabolas aren't symmetric about the y axis - the parabolas are being shifted such that their two far ends will be equidistant from the y axis. The only way the parabola will be symmetric is if its endpoints of the domain (-x and x) result in an equal y output, along with the B coefficient being equal to zero in the equation.
@firstnamelastname46857 жыл бұрын
Very clear!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! appeciate
@ashishsasmal75235 жыл бұрын
Thanx
@tiffanywong5795 жыл бұрын
very helpful , thxxxx^^_^^
@khushimaurya45906 жыл бұрын
Sir plz also explain 3/8 rule
@truthjunkie33 жыл бұрын
Didn't like the jump to the solution and trying to backtrack to "observe" it. Better to just derive it all the way through.
@AHMED501499310 жыл бұрын
patrick how to use simpson's rule from - infinite to a number
@thesage109611 жыл бұрын
Thanks!!!
@muhammadsadiq17927 жыл бұрын
sir why we take n is even
@anneupp94216 жыл бұрын
makes it easier to explain
@banderfargoyl6 жыл бұрын
Cool!
@iwilld0it2 жыл бұрын
mind = blown
@nikkiactub11 жыл бұрын
Ohhh, its fine! ;)
@saimafa55795 жыл бұрын
All i notice is that he is left handed
@laughtale11817 жыл бұрын
nice voice
@sonicworld79044 жыл бұрын
Sorry this my mistake
@jayant91516 жыл бұрын
Please be my teacher
@spectralanalysis8 жыл бұрын
9:22
@gian2kk7 жыл бұрын
you cheated tho
@sonicworld79044 жыл бұрын
See my post then comment ok
@rawansaif704411 жыл бұрын
Awesome as always .. the best teacher I've Ever had !