House of Games Scrooged Blue Velvet She-Devil Field of Dreams Once Upon a Time in America
Пікірлер: 164
@threeminuteshate3 жыл бұрын
God, they gave great film criticism. Regardless of how they rated a film, they saw nuance in a storyand explained themselves in ways which were unmistakable.
@ryangettig2743 жыл бұрын
Siskel & Ebert Gave Great Insight On Nuance:)
@zetetick3952 ай бұрын
These two really are great, I love how they can passionately disagree and then make each other laugh the next minute. Like an old married couple.
@Wildcock233 жыл бұрын
“Once Upon a Time In America” is a complete masterpiece… simply one of the greatest movies ever made.
@ryangettig2743 жыл бұрын
Cinematograohy-Tonino Delli Colli-Once Upon A Time In The West:)
@suzycreamcheesez43713 жыл бұрын
completely agree one of my faves
@jamesmitchell8922 Жыл бұрын
Execept the rape scene that offended me.
@rckblzr10 ай бұрын
Well at least you could say that audiences didn't blow it on that one since they wisely rejected the butchered version.
@CommieGobeldygook7 ай бұрын
@@jamesmitchell8922wuss
@doddsino3 жыл бұрын
Oh man, Gene accusing Roger that he didn't like Blue Velvet because it confused him sexually...the look of contempt on Roger's face afterward is PRICELESS.
@JeanAriaMouy3 жыл бұрын
That's below the belt i guess
@michaelmcdonald84523 жыл бұрын
He didn’t say it “confused him sexually,” you’re twisting his words because you think it’s cute to do so. The look of rejection on Roger’s face is simply because he doesn’t like the presumption (his own twisting) that Gene is making instead of Gene just listening to him.
@blastbeatindustries31912 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmcdonald8452 Gene should not have said that.
@billscannell932 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmcdonald8452 I think his exact words were "made him sexually uncomfortable," but that is more or less the same thing as "confusing him." I think the original poster is right--Ebert's expression was a mixture of incredulity and contempt.
@royfr81362 жыл бұрын
probabaly true though other wise he wouldnt have reacted like that ... i can't imagine him having sex
@Curiamacabre Жыл бұрын
As a woman i couldn’t agree more with Roger Elbert’s Point about the exploitation of Isabella Rossellini. I love David Lynch too, long time fan since 1981, and I adore Gene Siskel and side you him more, film wise. But Ebert has always been spot on about a lot of themes or issues in films that were exploitative and false. For that he was quite prescient and conscientious. As I get older, I have so much more respect For his opinions and his character and integrity as a man and a critic.
@DoncoEntAgain6 ай бұрын
Field of Dreams is one of the best-written movies of all time. Every once in a while I just like to read the dialogue and speeches from the film because they simply give me chills. Here's one great example: "Getting thrown out of baseball was like having part of me amputated. I've heard that old men wake up and scratch itchy legs that have been dust for over fifty years. That was me. I'd wake up at night with the smell of the ball park in my nose, the cool of the grass on my feet... The thrill of the grass." Just beautifully vivid writing.
@erinmalone2669 Жыл бұрын
Scrooged is my favorite adaptations of A Christmas Carrol. Two thumbs up.
@zetetick3952 ай бұрын
I love Murray comedies - But personally I'd give it to A Muppets Christmas Carol (from the following year after Scrooged?) I do love em both though
@nospam3327 Жыл бұрын
Scrooged is one of my favorite films of all time; I have it on VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray.
@grantwileyesq.5962 Жыл бұрын
I watch it once every year around Christmas! Great movie!
@raymondm.9954 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting this episode. I have been waiting for years to watch again their rehash of "Blue Velvet." Their original review of it was included as a DVD extra; this should have been, too.
@Jbaxter85 Жыл бұрын
My pleasure
@paulymar59962 жыл бұрын
Man, I'm really impressed with Siskel's point that initial box office numbers being reported can influence many people to either see or not see a movie. Basically that quite often people follow the crowd when choosing which movies to see.
@rckblzr17 күн бұрын
That's happened to me a couple of times. After The Super Mario Bros Movie made a ton of money in its opening weekend, I went out and saw it to see what all the fuss was about.
@williamnoonan73803 жыл бұрын
I only watch one holiday-themed movie around the Christmas season: Scrooged. Shine on, Gene!
@goldentaco49703 жыл бұрын
Funny that Scrooged became a cult classic/one of the most popular Christmas movies of all time. It's probably in the top three along with Christmas Story and Christmas Vacation.
@gspendlove2 жыл бұрын
It's always on my list, along with other Yet Another Christmas Carol movies (An American Christmas Carol with Henry Winkler, A Christmas Carol with George C. Scott, Scrooge with Albert Finney) and Home Alone.
@theessentials4507 ай бұрын
Siskel is spot-on about BLUE VELVET!
@sisterdoublehappiness9714 Жыл бұрын
So refreshing to see critics admit they may have been wrong.
@anothermonday5664 Жыл бұрын
But neither one of them did lol!
@markelijio60122 жыл бұрын
"Blue Velvet" (1986) was one of my favorite films and of course it's one of the best movies of the year. Nominated for an 1987 Academy Award for best direction-David Lynch. Released by DEG.
@bbender19752 жыл бұрын
To this day, it is the most original film I have ever seen.
@iluvmylovebirdandmybudgiet77292 жыл бұрын
Dennis Hopper was great....
@markthomas6703 Жыл бұрын
Boring. I made it maybe a half hour into it before turning it off
@sleong2 жыл бұрын
Amazing episode thanks! Their debate on Scrooged and Blue Velvet was awesome
@Jbaxter852 жыл бұрын
Once upon time in America is greatest epic period film, masterpiece 👍🌟🌟🌟🌟 Field of Dreams is ambition sport movie with great performances by Kevin Costner, Amy Madigan & James Earl Jones. 👍🌟🌟🌟🌟 House of Games is devious noir film with impeccable story & twist characters 👍🌟🌟🌟🌟
@lerm28663 жыл бұрын
Very cool find! Thanks. and as far as Blue Velvet goes they’re both right.
@JeanAriaMouy3 жыл бұрын
You beleive it was humiliating and mysoginist for isabellz rosselini ?
@lerm28663 жыл бұрын
@@JeanAriaMouy I believe those scenes focusing on her degradation are effective and a bit tasteless but they work for the film
@JeanAriaMouy3 жыл бұрын
@@lerm2866 yes it's quite tough in the film... But it's a role...it's fiction and besides her character is tormented and not simple in the film.. So i'm confused...
@rckblzr10 ай бұрын
And I'd say they're both right about Scrooged. I like the film, but Bill Murray was probably miscast since he can't convincingly play a reformed sweetheart.
@ShyGuyTravel9 ай бұрын
I would have liked to have seen a segment in which they raise movies that they feel other critics blew it on.
@crystalshaw87449 ай бұрын
I LOVE this...giggle
@efan20122 жыл бұрын
It really does warm my heart seeing Roger defend She Devil; it's really imo over hated and deserves more appreciation. It's a wickedly dark satire of women empowerment movies (it attacks the cliches of those movies, while doing a more natural character transformation for Ruth,) while being dark in how how the characters act and evolve (Streep is great and all but Begley Jr is really, really good in this. Prob one of his best performances as the ahole husband.) Roseanne really was good in this too; she hated making it but she wasn't awful in it. She fit the role perfectly. The director was a solid hand and she helped make it more sound and wicked with the satire. Granted it looks cheap in spots and hasn't aged well in a few places but I had a ball watching this recently more so than ever before in the past. Roger pretty much nailed it in terms of how Gene completely didn't get the movies point and whining over Rosie and Meryl not being on screen more. He musta seen the first teaser where they are both in it and that's all he knew. Props to Roger for knowing how the previous adaptions were. I do however disagree with Roger over Scrooged. It's honestly a great modernization of that story and I love how wickedly dark it is (Michael O'Donnahue co-wrote it.) There's nothing overly preachy about the end, Murray's monologue is one of his finest and is very heart warming. Gene nailed it on how awful Frank is; he has to fight to become better it doesn't naturally happen. Great cast and solid direction help makes it very solid imo.
@ricardocantoral7672 Жыл бұрын
I saw She Devil awhile back and I enjoyed it. Roseanne stole that movie.
@carlosoliveira-rc2xt Жыл бұрын
It's Garbage with a capital G and I'm a huge '80s movie fan. The fact that it grossed only 15 million dollars demonstrates most people feel the same way.
@williamgullett59113 жыл бұрын
A friend reminded me of the day I saw Blue Velvet in the theater. I saw it with two other friends. Later tgat day the friend asked us how Blue Velvet was. One friend said "It was great!!!!", I said "it was okay"...and the other friend said "IT SUCKED" opinions vary
@patrickriley6742 жыл бұрын
Ok, while I agree with Ebert about Bill Murray’s speech at the end of Scrooged was forced, I still seriously enjoyed the film. And Siskel giving thumbs down to Field of Dreams…I am still shocked. Still, I love these guys and I loved hearing them talk about movies! 😄
@nivbri7 ай бұрын
Gene could have said Rossellini chose to do that movie. Surely she wasn’t ambushed by full frontal
@Hossflex3 жыл бұрын
Ebert with the nice hair cut
@robzilla7304 ай бұрын
It's funny how Ebert is always quoted in media and Siskel almost always never is...
@user-uq6sz6po3dАй бұрын
Siskel's work is impossible to find on the web. It's never been collated and made available. Roger has a great website, wrote multiple books and made his work accessible. Other than these KZbin clips Siskel's work is gone. No idea why.
@woodenturkey2 жыл бұрын
She Devil is really funny
@seanc2061Ай бұрын
Gene slayed Roger here
@jessehaltia47953 жыл бұрын
How about Gene thumbing down Apocalypse Now? Must be the biggest wonderment in the series.
@avntori2 жыл бұрын
A few years later Gene admitted he was wrong on Apocalypse now
@rustymertz Жыл бұрын
Scrooged was funny, but it was completely unbelievable that he actually changed at the end. It didn’t even really feel like he did.
@ricardocantoral7672 Жыл бұрын
I totally agree. The film was quite funny and cynical until the end and then it became insincere.
@ZyxthePest6 ай бұрын
Thats...literally what happens at the end of A Christmas Carol. Scrooge flips as soon as he sees his own grave. Roger hating the movie for following the formula is headscrstching and his criticism of the supporting cast is bonkers.
@goldentaco49703 жыл бұрын
Funny that Scrooged became a cult classic/one of the most popular Christmas movies of all time. It's probably in the top three along with Christmas Story and Christmas Vacation. That is generally speaking. I like all three but I also have some more obscure favorites: like Emmet Otters Jugband Christmas and Will Vintons Claymation Christmas.
@brettayres57049 ай бұрын
I liked Scrooged
@TheNameisPlissken19813 жыл бұрын
Escape From New York and Over The Edge, two of my all time favorite films, were also split reviews. Gene gave thumbs up to NY and thumbs down to Edge. Roger was the opposite. However, I think time would have changed their minds. At least, I hope so.
@lerm28663 жыл бұрын
Over the Edge will forever be relevant
@losttribe30012 жыл бұрын
As I’ve gotten older, Escape from NY hasn’t hold up despite loving it as a teenager. Call it maturity…call it a change in interest…but I just don’t care for it anymore. So I’d be curious if they would change their minds also.
@doloreswallin43812 жыл бұрын
Over the Edge was great.
@Tolstoy1112 жыл бұрын
@@losttribe3001 It's not that great. It's a great idea for a movie that wasn't realized with much imagination.
@NeoConnor12 жыл бұрын
The irony was Roger didn't like escape from new York and gene did, yet Roger liked escape from la and yet Gene didn't.
I can see where Ebert is coming from in his dislike of Blue Velvet. I wish I could point out to him, though, that Tarantino is every BIT as exploitative and self-serving a director as Lynch (I would say a good deal more so) yet Ebert liked almost all the Tarantino movies, even the nastiest ones.
@braddyer44413 жыл бұрын
Ebert gave SCROOGED one star.
@bijibadness2 жыл бұрын
yes, thank you, they cleared that up. on this video. the video you just watched. or I _assume_ you watched, seeing as how you're commenting on it. laff.
@rucksackzen2 жыл бұрын
Roger was dead on about “Field of Dreams.” Gene was asleep at the wheel on this one.
@knownpleasures2 жыл бұрын
No gene was right. It’s an odd unconvincing mixture of fantasy and reality
@mjgyrosdude4843 жыл бұрын
If Roger was that morally offended with Blue Velvet then it was good that he never could review A Serbian Film. Hell he would have given it a negative one star possibly!
@gspendlove2 жыл бұрын
One critic (I forget who) said perfectly, "You don't want to see A Serbian Film. You just think you do." I agree. It's trash.
@smileybubbles98942 жыл бұрын
There's some serious cryptic things only certain people see that are very very wrong with the movie Scrooged
@jvick87 Жыл бұрын
Like what
@smileybubbles9894 Жыл бұрын
@@jvick87 can't tell you 😠🤪😓
@reneedennis20113 жыл бұрын
Blue Velvet is weird! 🥴
@chriscornelius25183 жыл бұрын
All Lynch films are weird.
@peterj47413 жыл бұрын
Better than normal, especially in film.
@danorthsidemang38343 жыл бұрын
Weird=stupid
@ricardocantoral76723 жыл бұрын
That was Lynch's most accessible film.
@willyboyw.57713 жыл бұрын
"Warm f'ing beer makes me f'ing puke!!"
@peterj47413 жыл бұрын
I think Ebert had some inside info regarding how Lynch treated Rosselini.
@Goldenwhatever3 жыл бұрын
More like Ebert was known to be infatuated with Ingrid Bergman and probably wasn’t able to separate those feelings when seeing someone that shares her blood and looks just like her on screen, abused. He wouldn’t apply the same criticism to a slew of other films that would fall under a similar level of, shall we say, harshness to an actress, which is why Gene was so mystified throughout the years over Roger’s really empty take. He’s projecting a lot onto the screen for an actress that literally dated the director. (This is coming from someone that’s a big fan of both guys.)
@handlebarmustache Жыл бұрын
Yes, the ending to Scrooged is "cringe", but it's also a Christmas movie. For whatever reason, Christmas movies can get away with certain tropes that are awful otherwise.
@ricardocantoral7672 Жыл бұрын
I like Scrooged but I agree with Roger about the ending, it just didn't work.
@jvick87 Жыл бұрын
Gene was wrong about She Devil, Roger was wrong about Scrooged.
@sallybrown4947 Жыл бұрын
Field of dreams...oh what a snoozer!!
@treystephens6166 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I don’t like sports movies.
@billnolte8644 Жыл бұрын
Even though he totally missed it on Field of Dreams, Gene won this one. Ebert lost all credibility for defending She Devil.
@GlorifiedTruth Жыл бұрын
I agree with Gene on Field of Dreams and about movies in general. Some movies are more concerned with creating iconic scenes than with telling a compelling story. (Licorice Pizza, e.g.)
@anothermonday5664 Жыл бұрын
This just seemed like an excuse to get them to fight one more time about old movies... And it's hilarity. . Because neither guy changed his mind LMAO!!!
@saffmichael43692 жыл бұрын
Gene was right about Field of Dreams. It is a movie of great moments but doesn't really have a cohesive throughline. I still watch it from time to time but I can stop watching it at any point because it just doesn't matter what comes next...just a serious of moments.
@guidosanchez56952 жыл бұрын
Hmm. I loved "Blue Velvet." And I liked "Scrooged." A Lot. I didn't care for "Field of Dreams." Or "She-Devil." Guess I'm Team Gene.
@bbender19752 жыл бұрын
Roger blew it big time on Blue Velvet.
@gheller2261 Жыл бұрын
Nah. It was an icky film.
@treystephens6166 Жыл бұрын
@@gheller2261 icky ???
@Hexon66 Жыл бұрын
It's surprising that Gene, in his criticism of Field of Dreams, didn't mention the elephant in the room (or cornfield, as it were) that holds the film back from being great, in my opinion. The monologue by James Earl Jones may be stirring and inspirational, but rings hollow considering that being spoken by an African-American actor, it becomes all too clear that there is not a single Black historical baseball player on the field. By virtue of the choice of James Earl Jones as a Salinger surrogate, it very obviously and cringingly ignores that baseball has not been as wholesome as reported, banning Black players for nearly half a century until Jackie Robinson. And it would have been so easy to remedy, with plenty of players to choose from... Moses Fleetwood (19th century player in professional baseball), Josh Gibson, Jackie Robinson himself, could have been featured, even passingly. They had non-White Sox players by the end, Smokey Joe Wood, Mel Ott. But even by 1989, filmmakers couldn't quite recognize their bias against inclusion.
@gheller2261 Жыл бұрын
Good points.
@kaneko2693 жыл бұрын
Lynch comments on sexual violence 'cause unfortunately it happens in real life not 'ceuse he enjoys it, some people just dont wanna see the truth
@BM-wh5qk Жыл бұрын
I guess I identify more with Siskel because I think Field of Dreams sucked and Scrooged was okay.
@jamesquinonez3914 Жыл бұрын
I don't understand why Roger was so morally opposed to Blue Velvet and gave a negative review because of it but gave both the Birth of a Nation and Triumph of the Will 4 stars? I don't know if he just changed that mindset of giving negative reviews to films he morally opposed or if he just gave them good reviews because they are important to cinema history
@crystalshaw87449 ай бұрын
Rivals The Godfather....uhhh no
@daakrolb Жыл бұрын
What a great show. Great guys. Real men who could disagree while staying composed & not acting like emotional women.
@jamesmitchell8922 Жыл бұрын
The problem for me with Once Upon a time in America is the De Niro character raping his new wife inside a car. An awful scene that wrecks the popularity of the movie.
@michaelmcdonald84523 жыл бұрын
It is specifically moments like JEJ’s cheeseball speech that make me like FoD less and less every time I watch it.
@ericfelds62912 жыл бұрын
Even when they were blatantly wrong, like Ebert with Blue Velvet, and Siskels apocalypse now review, their criticism was still at lest insightful and interesting. RedLetterMedia is no Siskel and Ebert, Mike and jay are siskel and Ebert if they went down two standard deviations in Iq and then became cynical, socially unconscious drunkards. Rich is great though.
@natejamesr10813 жыл бұрын
At least Gene knew he was wrong and flip flopped on Broken Arrow. Unlike Roger having to double down on Cop and a Half bc his big ego wouldn't let him change his mind 🤣
@keithforsay42043 жыл бұрын
It's Hard To Figure-Out Just How Big Was Roger Eberts Ego About As Big As His Fat-Keester Was I Guess
@michaelmcdonald84523 жыл бұрын
@@keithforsay4204 childish comment
@michaelmcdonald84523 жыл бұрын
What does his “ego” have to do with simply having a consistent point of view thats different from yours?
@michaelmcdonald84523 жыл бұрын
Your view of and use of “wrong” regarding criticism of art is hilarious.
@natejamesr10813 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmcdonald8452 How so? You trolling douche!
@CR055FIRE9 ай бұрын
blue velvet is well directed but it's just lame the story is boring and uninteresting
@morgan87573 жыл бұрын
field of dreams i did not like
@goldentaco49703 жыл бұрын
I never saw.
@michaelmcdonald84523 жыл бұрын
@@goldentaco4970 wow, two unsolicited pointless comments
@goldentaco49703 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmcdonald8452 I guess three unsolicited pointless comments if we include your random shit. Move along now.
@royfr81362 жыл бұрын
For me Ebert comes across in these shows as just not a nice guy....
@royfr81362 жыл бұрын
Field of Dreams is a terrible movie.
@dibbsutd2 жыл бұрын
Field of dreams is one of the most overrated movies ever.
@LumpyAdams2 жыл бұрын
Scrooged is okay but She-Devil is GOD awful.
@danorthsidemang38343 жыл бұрын
Roger couldn't have been more WRONG about Field of Dreams. Most overrated piece of crap sports film ever.
@blastbeatindustries31913 жыл бұрын
Bull Durham is an overrated piece of crap.
@ryangettig2743 жыл бұрын
Are Bobby Deerfield & LeMans Sports films or racing films?are they a sub-genre like Quentin Tarantino might say??:)
@doloreswallin43812 жыл бұрын
Field of Dreams was excellent.
@widowrumstrypze97052 жыл бұрын
It was nauseating DRECK!! I wouldn't date guys who liked it, lol. Blue Velvet was better!
@Psylliumhead Жыл бұрын
Blue Velvet is horrible.
@robink.85322 жыл бұрын
Gladiator is overrated (despite the good performances).
@robink.85322 жыл бұрын
I like it, but…masterpiece? No.
@Tolstoy1112 жыл бұрын
It's just plain old lousy.
@keithforsay42043 жыл бұрын
The Star Wars! Movies Are The Biggest Overrated Bores In Movie-History Darth Vader Sounds Like A Obsene Phone-Caller With That Heavy Breathing Of His
@michaelmcdonald84523 жыл бұрын
Your comments are idiotic
@yaywhewclips2422 жыл бұрын
Seek professional help
@knownpleasures2 жыл бұрын
Or some dude who simply smokes too many cigarettes 🚬
@freddyfurrah37898 ай бұрын
Field of Dreams had a useless and nonsensical scene, just so it could spout off how good the 60S were? I bought House Of Games and The Right Stuff. Two of the best movies from the 80s, or from any decade, for that matter.
@ricardocantoral76727 ай бұрын
House of Games is one of the top Neo Noir films. The Right Stuff was inspiring and highly accessible.