Siskel & Ebert (1993): Point of No Return, CB4, Fire in the Sky & Barbarians at the Gate

[@joshgellis3292]

‘Siskel & Ebert’ was a perfect show. R.I.P the show, and, both of them.😢

[@ryangettig274]

Siskel & Ebert Loved Fear Of A Black Hat which was light years better than CB4-Chris Rock is clearly doing Eazy-E:)

[@ricardocantoral7672]

James Garner was one of the finest natural actors who ever lived.

[@matthewschwartz6607]

Is it true that he suffered from depression, as well?

[@ricardocantoral7672]

@@matthewschwartz6607 I have no idea.

[@Shorty_Lickens]

Barbarians at the Gate was one of those special movies that no one saw yet entertained greatly.

[@gregman05]

Love CB-4 😎

[@aggressiveattitudeera887]

Yeah, it was hella funny. But not as funny as Fear Of A Black Hat.

[@ganglabesh]

fire in the sky is good

[@aggressiveattitudeera887]

That spaceship scene gave me nightmares.

[@ganglabesh]

@@aggressiveattitudeera887 its really good stuff in there

[@moppetgirl8831]

Fire in the sky is good film. I enjoy the whole film.

[@Hellraiser0601]

Surprisingly I agree with Siskel. The remake added absolutely nothing new or different to the original. They only translated the script and casted new actors. If you feel intrigued or interested by the plot, check out the original French version.

[@reneedennis2011]

I like LaFemme Nikita, too.

[@reneedennis2011]

R.I.P. Deezer D.

[@johnszczerba9979]

Funny watching them now i didn't recall disagreeing with their takes so much. At least one of them usually Siskel gives a rhumbs down to movies i like

[@ilovebrandnewcarpets]

Anyone ever listen to Roger reviewing a movie positively, and know with about 90% certainty that Jean is going to hate it? 😂

[@ganglabesh]

Gene

[@rustykuntz94]

Not even a mention of Robert Patrick in Fire in the Sky. I thought his performance was great in that

[@ganglabesh]

absolutely

[@RemoGutierrez1]

Point of No Return is like the Bourne Identity but not as good

[@uhdudewhy7980]

The reason the alien abduction scene was "spiced up" in Fire In The Sky is because the filmmakers were attempting to make the viewer feel the same level of emotional trauma that the real Travis Walton went through. If they had filmed a fact-by-fact account of the abduction, the viewer would've been bored to tears even though the actual abduction still traumatized Walton. Walton at first objected to the way the filmmakers were going to film the scene but they explained what I explained above to him and so he came around and went with it.

[@DeanStrickson]

LOL. A truly true account would’ve been really boring, considering Walton is a fraud.

[@uhdudewhy7980]

@@DeanStrickson Why do you think he's a fraud? I've read his book and if he's a fraud, he's certainly had to go waaaay out of his way to cover it up.

[@matthewschwartz6607]

Did some of this get cut off? They didn’t even introduce themselves.

[@BallparkHunter]

CB4 could have been so much better. There were some funny parts, but as a whole, it was a disappointment.

[@Jbaxter85]

II Ladro Di Bambini 👍🌟🌟🌟 Barbarians at the Gate 👍🌟🌟🌟🌟 Point of No Return 👎🌟🌟 CB4 👎🌟🌟