Siskel: "The film does work as a pulp drama." Ebert: "(Michael) Douglas is right on. It's a terrific performance."
Пікірлер: 263
@80sNewWaveGeek2 жыл бұрын
Watching Siskel and Ebert 30-40 years later is quite fascinating, as they were around when films seemed to be held to much higher standards than today.
@taroman7100 Жыл бұрын
YES!
@kevaninthe41357 жыл бұрын
I'm with Ebert on this. Wall Street is a classic.
@marioiacolucci4 жыл бұрын
Yes it is
@marioiacolucci4 жыл бұрын
I've seen both of them
@dominatedrebin3 жыл бұрын
Siskel is totally off base here Wall St is an absolute classic!
@SuperRip73 жыл бұрын
It is not a classic. It is just a good movie.
@GregoryAlanBaileygamereviews2 жыл бұрын
@@SuperRip7 Falling Down is his best movie.
@christopherthorkon3997 Жыл бұрын
Roger Ebert was right on the money with this one. And, of course, Michael Douglas ended up winning an Academy Award for his performance.
@adamgordon64356 жыл бұрын
I love when Siskel and Ebert disagreed and argued. Some times I agreed with one, some times the other, but their passion and insights always made it fun to watch. Often they both had good points, even if their opinions differed. I miss these guys. No one has really taken their place.
@mikemorgan80804 жыл бұрын
I was just thinking the same thing...And if they both agreed - it was a must see movie for me!
@natalieps23873 жыл бұрын
The best review I ever saw was theirs of red sonya. They are almost slap happy barely getting through it without laughing. I mean they have Been off the mark many times or like something awful. Siskel could never get over ebert loving cop & a half lol.
@ssssssstssssssss2 жыл бұрын
Yeah. I really enjoy it. Cause you can tell they respect and like each other even when it gets heated. You don’t see much like it anymore
@birdmantd2 жыл бұрын
So true. This kind of kind of spirited but intelligent back and forth is lacking today. Argument not to be mean to the other person but because they're both passionate about what they do and see.
@reginaldperiwinkle3 жыл бұрын
Only Siskel and Ebert could both give a movie thumbs up and still strongly disagree with each other.
@maskedmarvyl47745 жыл бұрын
At 2:58, Siskel says, "he could run for office with that speech". If only he knew what was coming in twenty years....
@cockoffgewgle49934 жыл бұрын
Obama?
@ntl59834 жыл бұрын
@@cockoffgewgle4993 Bush whacked.
@80s_Boombox_Collector4 жыл бұрын
More like 30 years
@lenblack14623 жыл бұрын
@@cockoffgewgle4993 Trump, of course.
@RideAcrossTheRiver3 жыл бұрын
@@cockoffgewgle4993
@HHM7062 жыл бұрын
Bloody hell Siskel was barking up the wrong tree on this one!🤣
@viralbuthow0003 жыл бұрын
Miss these two. Simpler times, man.
@highvoltagemedia71506 жыл бұрын
Aaaand Douglas won the best Actor oscar. And he deserved it. Great performance
@paulpatane24397 жыл бұрын
Siskel said Douglass over-acted.?? What the fuck. Douglass was brilliant
@degsbabe7 жыл бұрын
Certainly was . When he got his Oscar he should have gone up to Siskel and said 'this is what over acting gets you..'
@nikosvault6 жыл бұрын
it was brilliant over-acting.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
*Douglas
@paulrimmer28532 жыл бұрын
Siskel tried to kill the best movie of the 80s. Michael Douglas's performance was iconic. Gordon Gecko is the Film star of the decade.
@guslakis2 жыл бұрын
Ebert was always smarter and more accurate with his reviews.
@MAFion Жыл бұрын
He gave it thumbs up.
@NemeanLion- Жыл бұрын
@@MAFion begrudgingly
@kfreeze28365 жыл бұрын
Im usually always with ebert. And he is right again.
@NemeanLion- Жыл бұрын
I think Siskel’s problem is he would just reject films on principle, rather than just sit back and view a film with a neutral perspective.
@bitw91414 жыл бұрын
Michael Douglas delivered a great performance in this film, along with his great performance with Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction.
@wolffman24452 жыл бұрын
100% agree
@rochelle123ist5 жыл бұрын
I like hearing these two argue
@majestyk33376 жыл бұрын
Ebert: "Of course he could run for office, he's really slick and smooth."
@jrock27202 жыл бұрын
god I miss this show. two deeply intelligent and experienced individuals, well versed in their craft, having a cogent and civil argument sparring with each other without any guff and without taking any offense. they push each other without their language becoming personal. such a brilliant series.
@rnoitheryet90872 жыл бұрын
yes, a time when you'd debate an issue--not a person--and enjoy learning something new and gaining a richer perspective.
@warriormanmaxx8991 Жыл бұрын
@J Rock - re: "god I miss this show." Do you often write to God via KZbin comments ?? Ever get a response?
@taroman7100 Жыл бұрын
We got lucky now we dont have squat. The Marvel comics universe crap would have them both crazy!
@The3rdGunman7 жыл бұрын
Love Love Love Michael Douglas!!!
@redastrachan89784 жыл бұрын
"Overplayed" his part? Error. I know some some of these Wall St. pirhanas...
@SG-xc7of7 жыл бұрын
A great film is one in which you can watch it again and again and it still entertains. Wall Street is a great film. And Michael Douglas is superb in this film. Siskel was dead wrong.
@kendallandrews86915 жыл бұрын
Yep. Wall Street can be watched over and over. It is also one that if it is on tv you stop and watch it even if you have it on dvd. It is that good.
@jeffwolfe40585 жыл бұрын
Siskel and Ebert wrong again. So sad these guys had a monopoly on film reviews for too long.
@lenblack14624 жыл бұрын
@@jeffwolfe4058 Siskel only. Ebert was right.
@buddieadkins78084 жыл бұрын
@@jeffwolfe4058 uh how can you have a monopoly on film reviews?
@jeffwolfe40584 жыл бұрын
@@buddieadkins7808 cause back in the day if it got two thumbs up it would be in every ad for a movie or poster. Usually wouldn't mention any other reviews. Plus there was no KZbin so the only reviewers with a show was them and they were regularly booked on talk shows to discuss movies as the headline guest for the show. This went on for more than 2 decades. Hope that answers your question.
@jasonthompson-zq4js5 жыл бұрын
God, I miss these guys.
@warriormanmaxx8991 Жыл бұрын
@jason thompson - re: "God, I miss these guys." Do you often write to God via KZbin comments? Ever get a response?
@celsiusfahrenheit1176 Жыл бұрын
Turned out to be a classic
@edwardcampion47006 жыл бұрын
Skel so wrong douglas was brillant thoroughly deserved his oscar
@NemeanLion-4 жыл бұрын
Lol, Douglas won an Oscar for this film. Siskel was too hung up on the director of “Platoon” and expected every film thereafter to be the same caliber.
@fawkkyutuu88513 жыл бұрын
I'll take Wallstreet over Platoon any day.
@ANTHONY0808able3 жыл бұрын
Yes Siskel was distracted by Platoon, what a clown. Wall Street a mega classic.
@FantasticOtto3 жыл бұрын
NemeanLion Should you not expect film makers to create films of the same caliber as they’ve made before? I think it’s totally reasonable.
@NemeanLion-3 жыл бұрын
FantasticOtto No, it’s not reasonable to expect a director to produce an Oscar winner every time they make a film.
@FantasticOtto3 жыл бұрын
NemeanLion I’m not talking about awards. I’m talking about craftsmanship. Awards are political and fad driven. A director should strive to make every film his best. Of course the success rate isn’t high and I’m not saying Stone didn’t try. But that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be pointed out, as Siskel did here: Wall Street did not live up to the expectations that Platoon created. Win some, lose some.
@natalieps23874 жыл бұрын
Douglas deserved the oscar. The greed is good speech is a classic.
@roypiper581 Жыл бұрын
When Ebert and Siskel disagree, 4 times in 5 I would side with Ebert.
@christopher82205 жыл бұрын
Siskel and Ebert - I give it two thumbs up!!!
@robertpolanco19736 жыл бұрын
Personally, I LOVED "Wall Street" because the movie shows about the politics of capitalism. I was so entertained by the movie and it should be a life lesson for those who want to experience the myth of capitalism.
@4redniwediS4 жыл бұрын
Robert Polanco how is capitalism a myth?
@josephmalez49184 ай бұрын
great movie.
@natepeace1737 Жыл бұрын
Big miss for Siskel here. Michael Douglas won the academy award for his performance.
@75aces974 жыл бұрын
4:40 Ebert concedes that Sheen is weakest link in the movie because he's too baby faced. 😄 That actually makes this even more fascinating, knowing what was to become of Charlie.
@birdmantd2 жыл бұрын
Most critics seemed to be of the opinion Daryl Hannah was actually the weak link. Even she herself has admitted she was wrong for the part. I thought Charlie did an alright job. If he played the character as more cocky it would have undermined Douglas' great performance.
@75aces972 жыл бұрын
@@birdmantd Yes, I've heard a lot of peop,people, say that, and I would agree. Not so much that she's a weak link, but just that she was wrong for the part. You can be a good enough actor, and still be miscast. I thought the comment on Sheen was strange, though. 😆 He was still a fresh face, but had already shown he can have some menace just below the surface (Wraith, Out of Bounds, Platoon, Ferris Bueller).
@Hack_The_Planet_ Жыл бұрын
@@birdmantd personally I don’t think Daryl was miscast, more misused.
@NemeanLion- Жыл бұрын
@@75aces97 I somewhat agree with Ebert. I don’t think Sheen’s performance was bad, but I wasn’t captivated by it in this film. I don’t agree with Ebert that he’s too much of a baby face though, as long as you can display the emotional complexity of the dilemma he was in. I never really felt it.
@75aces97 Жыл бұрын
@@NemeanLion- I suppose. I kind of view Sheen as a good character actor who got starring roles in major films…until he didn’t. Who would have been a better casting choice at the time? Robert Downey Jr? Cage? Depp? 😕
@xendava72174 жыл бұрын
Gordon Gecko to me is one of the best bad guys ever in film. That look on Buds face when he realizes he's been played is classic. But not as much as when Gecko realized that Foxx found out before he was supposed to. I thought this film was very good. The end was a bit of a letdown but it's good. I love that scene where Bud Foxx's dad told his son exactly who Gecko was. Not only did he not fool the old man he was disappointed in the fact that his son didn't see it. Good stuff. It's like he blamed himself for it. One should see it if they haven't. Michael Douglass was great.
@jjgreen52062 жыл бұрын
Love the discourse on Wall Street. One of their best reviews
@jcferg77336 ай бұрын
The best…!!
@SN29037 жыл бұрын
Great film.
@MapleSyrupPoet2 жыл бұрын
Great actors in this 👏 🎭
@BAS-gi8qi2 жыл бұрын
Loved seeing these guys disagree! So entertaining
@L3nny6665 жыл бұрын
Gosh these must have been good times... People actually having an argument
@yowtfever4 жыл бұрын
great back and forth!
@mykal.74244 жыл бұрын
Douglas was masterful ...Sheen doesn't get credit , but he really good in this you see his transformation as his father warns him early on what he's becoming. It's a great film .
@09rja3 жыл бұрын
Great film. I always thought one of the plot holes was a guy like Gekko meeting with union reps that low on the food chain. In reality, there would be several layers of union management between them and Gekko.
@kimward5746 Жыл бұрын
I love that Big Guy criticized Skinny Guy's criticism because it's just comparison. I HATE it when you say "Hey have you heard Blank's new album?" and the only thing someone can say is "It's not as good as Blank's other stuff." Irrelevant information for judging THAT album, or THAT film. And Wall Street rocked.
@adamkelly80703 жыл бұрын
Michael Douglas was fantastic in this. The theater was captivated by how unapologetically evil he was.
@taroman7100 Жыл бұрын
He looks like the devil when he rolls down the window after Bud tells me he's in!
@hmdwgf10 ай бұрын
Wall Street is probably Michael Douglas’s best performance- at least it has the best acted scene by Michael Douglas. That scene in the park where Sheen entraps Douglas is so brilliantly acted by Douglas that that scene alone is probably what got him that Best Actor Oscar.
@DJ-bj8ku3 жыл бұрын
Loved Siskel
@coreyoldknow2725 жыл бұрын
Elbert nailed on this one .
@MrNerflow5 жыл бұрын
Oh my God Siskel is so wrong when he says that Michael Douglas is overacting. Michael Douglas was extremely good in Wall Street. We all make mistake and siskel made on reviewing Wall Street
@quitstaringatme17 жыл бұрын
Usually Gene reflects closer to my opinion but on this one I'm Team Ebert all the way, classic movie!
@danielmcdermott1386 жыл бұрын
quitstaringatme1 4
@damonwillis36725 жыл бұрын
He still recommended the film though
@ACD1994 Жыл бұрын
Oscars disagreed with Siskel here. Michael Douglas, won best actor for, his performance as Gordon Gekko.
@GlorifiedTruth3 жыл бұрын
IT HURTS.
@xpat735 жыл бұрын
Siskel is totally wrong. The script was great and Michael Douglas was perfect.
@Danimal774 жыл бұрын
So, his opinion is wrong, but yours is right? That's not how opinions work. You should know this by now at 46 years old.
@1986SSMONTECARLO6 жыл бұрын
Thumbs up
@Kruppt8085 жыл бұрын
Wall Street is a much better movie than Platoon, Gecko is one of the most memorable characters in movie history.
@jamesmack33145 жыл бұрын
You're kidding right? Platoon is much more powerful,moving,and intense than WS
@SN29034 жыл бұрын
Different types of films.
@robbie1923 жыл бұрын
@@acestriker413 you don't know that
@thornto8883 жыл бұрын
I've binged A LOT of Siskel and Ebert reviews and it's shocking how many times Siskel gets it wrong. In contrast, Ebert's reviews nail it and hold up 30+ yrs later. It's just so shocking how different these guys are. Siskel is out of touch, much of the time.
@michaeljordanfansaretheworst2 жыл бұрын
You just wrote that basically because you agree with Roger Ebert .
@erichaynes75022 жыл бұрын
I agree it's almost shocking how picky and negative he is about many good-great movies.
@knownpleasures Жыл бұрын
Sometimes they deliberately disagree with each other to play ying and yang
@NemeanLion- Жыл бұрын
Siskel’s problem is he rejected too many movies on principle alone, without seeing movies for what they are. He just sees it as an Oliver Stone film and if it’s not the caliber of Platoon, he considers it a failure. He can’t see how good it is because he’s wearing rose colored glasses and his standards are set too high. His sound criticism of Michael Douglas’ performance, shows just how ridiculous he can get, especially considering how Douglas won the Oscar for this performance.
@joeblough261 Жыл бұрын
@@NemeanLion- Indeed.
@mortgagesdemystified10 ай бұрын
Ebert is on the money here, love the comparison to 'the Sweet Smell of Success'
@jec1ny3 жыл бұрын
The verdict of the box office, the Oscars and history have clearly come down on Roger's side of this debate.
@AngusRockford4 жыл бұрын
I think Gene was right on this one. Unlike most of Stone’s early movies, this one does not necessarily reward repeat viewings. Good to see at least once for Douglas’s iconic “greed is good” speech, which still resonates, much like Baldwin’s “ABC” speech in Glengarry Glen Ross.
@STONESGAM4 жыл бұрын
How could anyone not be entertained by this film?...You don't need to know much about trading and Wallstreet to enjoy the film. And Douglas gives one of the all time great performances here. Siskel really was hard to please...he was always looking for something to nit pick about.
@thevoxdeus Жыл бұрын
Well, to be fair, his job is literally to be critical. A critic who loves everything or who treats everything as a binary (it's the best or it's the worst) has little value to his audience. Siskel says the movie is worth watching, it just doesn't meet the high standard that he had in mind for it.
@mattcastellanos2178 Жыл бұрын
Sometimes siskel would trap himself with “predictable”, this great film was all about the performances.
@barbaraalexander31786 жыл бұрын
Ebert's comment that "Wall Street" should be regarded in the same genre as "Sweet Smell of Success" was right on target. In fact, Oliver Stone later admitted that "Wall Street" was modeled on "Sweet Smell of Success," with some scenes and situations coming directly from that earlier movie classic. And Stone was a big fan of Ernest Lehman, who co-wrote "Sweet Smell of Success."
@kristiantoimil4 жыл бұрын
It's fascinating watching these old reviews and really makes you appreciate their original show, "Sneak Previews" which being on PBS, was not constrained by commercial-requirements. Would have loved to hear these two talk some more about it, but their budgeted their 5 minutes and must move on!
@sha112356 жыл бұрын
In Roger's written review of this film, he predicts the Donald Trump Presidency!!!!!!!!!!!
@luqas996 жыл бұрын
Back then, that seemed crazy. Innocent times...
@johnwilburn4 жыл бұрын
In Gecko's model, everyone loses their job and Gecko makes money. In Trump's mode, everyone who wants a job has one.
@80s_Boombox_Collector4 жыл бұрын
@@johnwilburn Except Trump doesn't give a shit about any of that. He plays to his middle-class base, but he really doesn't care about them beyond playing to their emotions to get their vote. Trump's true base consists of billionaires and corporate lobbyists, because they're the people who benefit most from his policies.
@johnwilburn4 жыл бұрын
@@80s_Boombox_Collector The people who have the most will benefit the most, but that’s true of a lot of things. If the real estate market is up 10%, that benefits a person with a $500,000 house twice as much as a person with a $250,000 house. Ultimately, everyone is better off under Trump, but you’d never know it from listening to the media trying to blame him for the current rioting, coronavirus, and everything else.
@80s_Boombox_Collector4 жыл бұрын
@@johnwilburn Better off? That's debatable. If you're in banking or real estate or fossil fuels or defense, then sure. But in other industries it's a mixed bag. The blue collar jobs he brought back to the US were negated by the jobs he destroyed with his trade war. And sure, his corporate tax cuts have caused stocks to go up, but they haven't caused salaries to increase for most workers. Also, I don't agree with tax cuts if they cause an increased deficit, which is what happened after he approved those cuts. I also don't agree with cutting regulations that protect the environment, which also often protects our health as well.
@jonathanruano49739 ай бұрын
I know people like Gecko and their personality is exactly the same as Gordon Gecko's. Ebert is right on about that.
@Socialdogma4 жыл бұрын
Douglas won a Best Actor for this role. Ebert > Siskel.
@nickcopeland69155 жыл бұрын
The only film to win both an Oscar and a Razzie.
@jonathanlocke64044 жыл бұрын
After watching dozens (maybe hundreds?) or these reviews over the years, I've come to the conclusion that: A)Siskel just lost a coin flip, and had to take the contrary side just to make an argument or B)He doesn't really know what's he's talking about...
@Ailsworth3 жыл бұрын
Oh Gene, how can you be so wrong so often? Nobody quotes Platoon ever, but I don't know anyone who has no Wall Street quotes on their lips - even today.
@66trw4 жыл бұрын
Martin should have won the Oscar
@acork7601 Жыл бұрын
Bro we get it, it’s not Platoon. It’s a different movie.
@victorespino56505 жыл бұрын
Lol their arguing is aweome haha
@jasongoodner15185 жыл бұрын
2018 wants to talk about dat cell phone...
@davidhutchinson78884 жыл бұрын
The legendary Motorola brick
@williamdillard50603 жыл бұрын
Well we know Mr Ebert was wrong on Michael Douglas's amazing performance because he won an Oscar for that performance.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
Wrong critic.
@davidfrederick60035 жыл бұрын
I love that argument between them about Gecko...real wall street tyrants are silent or are they out in the open
@EGC3162 жыл бұрын
Ebert proven correct again
@DannyAbs4 жыл бұрын
Siskel .... Wrong Again !!!!
@SNESdrunk Жыл бұрын
Siskel had a bad habit of letting his own already-well-formed opinions affect his viewpoint of certain films, and this is a good example. He says it's not reflective of the actual state of finance in the US... so what?? Like Roger says, look what's on the screen
@Flosseveryday4 жыл бұрын
Siskels logic doesn't make any sense. Ebert countered him perfectly on every point.
@majestyk33376 жыл бұрын
After all that Gene gave it thumbs up. Go figure.
@Kruppt8085 жыл бұрын
Shits on the movie and Douglas performance but then gives it a thumbs up. Fuck you Gene. You were always the sidekick.
@purplemonkeydishwasher42414 жыл бұрын
@@Kruppt808 That's bullshit. Siskel and Ebert was an equal partnership, he was no sidekick.
@Maniac16075 жыл бұрын
Ebert was right - Douglas was excellent, Sheen was weak.
@rxtsec14 жыл бұрын
still a good movie but sheen was kinda weak
@USA-qm2bk4 жыл бұрын
The sheen character is suppose to be weaker
@zackmiller7082 Жыл бұрын
Siskel's analysis that Gekko could run for political office was dead right....Donald Trump went up to Oliver Stone after a screening of that film and said he liked the Gekko character a lot.
@Pedrosdanckwardt5 жыл бұрын
"Although Gekko's law-breaking would of course be opposed by most people on Wall Street, his larger value system would be applauded. The trick is to make his kind of money without breaking the law. Financiers who can do that, such as Donald Trump, are mentioned as possible presidential candidates, and in his autobiography Trump states, quite simply, that money no longer interests him very much. He is more motivated by the challenge of a deal and by the desire to win. His frankness is refreshing, but the key to reading that statement is to see that it considers only money, on the one hand, and winning, on the other. No mention is made about creating goods and services, to manufacturing things, to investing in a physical plant, to contributing to the infrastructure." Quote from Ebert's written review of the movie.
@ML-ul2zq4 жыл бұрын
There is nothing refreshing about Donald Trump. He's a soul killer.
@rxtsec14 жыл бұрын
funny that siskel said michael douglass overacted when he won a oscar for this
@AngusRockford4 жыл бұрын
rxtsec1 Lots of Oscar-winning performances are horrendously overacted. Anthony Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs, and Tom Hanks has in almost all of his Oscar-winning and nominated performances come readily to mind. I’ll throw Bette Davis in there. In fact, early Oscars really loved over-the-top melodramatic performances. Having said that, I don’t think Douglas was that bad by comparison.
@rxtsec14 жыл бұрын
@@AngusRockford will have to disagree on that and obviously Hollywood disagreed with you & siskel also
@AngusRockford4 жыл бұрын
rxtsec1 Well “Hollywood” has a great track record for always being right and having great taste. You got me, there.
@rxtsec14 жыл бұрын
@@AngusRockford not always but I happen to agree with them here. You agree with siskel & Ebert who once gave speed 2 two thumbs up. Again speed 2 so I guess they have great taste like you
@AngusRockford4 жыл бұрын
rxtsec1 All I said was that lots of bad performances have won Oscars. If you think, conversely, that all Oscar-winning performances are golden, by definition, it’s your privilege to feel that way. If you thought Hanks in “Forest Gump,” Pacino in “Scent of a Woman,” Hopkins in “Silence of the Lambs,” or Crowe in “Gladiator” were the best male performances of those years, you do you.
@SwordofDamoclese15 жыл бұрын
Every now and then one if them just got it wrong For Ebert it was "Gladiator". For Siskel it was "Wall Street".
@tristramcoffin9263 жыл бұрын
It never occurred to me before because the Gekko character is so devilishly fun to watch but Siskel is right. Michael Douglas does over-act the performance.
@brianforbes83253 жыл бұрын
Even though Ebert loved this film, he was right that Charlie Sheen's performance had a weakness - he did seem too fresh-faced or baby-faced to sell any one on these manipulations. And while Siskel was overly critical of the film, he did have a point that many of the big heavy-hitting Wall Street raiders were (and are) cold, quiet, cunning, ruthless types, more so than Gordon Gekko was.
@jikan-tabi-18884 ай бұрын
And the 1988 Oscar goes to....Michael Douglas...Sorry Siskel but Ebert was dead right about Gordon Gekko. And we agree.
@nomibe29115 жыл бұрын
Overacted? That's one thing you don't come off saying after watching the movie.
@joefelice50623 жыл бұрын
Siskel suddenly thinks this film should be a documentary where the Gordon Gecko character is concerned. He makes no sense trying to explain that Stone should have made GG quieter because he thinks that is what real tycoons are like. Such a disjointed, inconsistent criticism... Ebert wrecks him in the argument.
@maxreturn343 жыл бұрын
"Fuck you Gene!" - Ebert
@meltz9115 жыл бұрын
I usually don't agree with Ebert but he's right. Wtf is wrong with Gene, was he having a bad day? Wall Street is considered a classic now!
@MaverickOrange6 жыл бұрын
@1:45 Important.
@rondobson182811 ай бұрын
I usually agree more with Ebert, including on this one.
@TillThenPlease3 жыл бұрын
What is Siskel on? Michael Douglas was phenomenal in this film
@labenbrittenum69342 жыл бұрын
that elevator scene between CHARLIE an MARTIN was almost to painful to watch
@justinbergmans364 жыл бұрын
I wonder what siskel thought when Douglas win best actor. Roger has a more tuned in sensibility when it comes to films that will be well received. He loved chariots of fire and thought it was the best film. Gene didn’t agree. Then it won
@holydiver13764 жыл бұрын
Poor Siskel.
@rahulshome27584 жыл бұрын
Ebert is right on this one. This is easily Michael's best performance he ever did and won an Oscar for it. Siskel's review on this movie is wayyyyyy off!
@popeyedoyle2356 жыл бұрын
Roger Barnes is the man.
@user-fe6dn7cq6f4 жыл бұрын
This was one of those films that I enjoyed well enough watching, and then a couple days later thought, boy I got nothing out of that, that sucked.
@sysbm4life9234 жыл бұрын
It's funny that these film critics that know everything, can't make a hit movie.
@jjmalm2 жыл бұрын
I think they're both right. I think Douglas could have played it way more subtly and it would have made it better. I think it was a better movie than he gave credit. The evidence is how it remains an '80s masterpiece
@MrBdiddypop4 жыл бұрын
Wall Street is an entertaining movie. I think it's about the seduction of money and wealth and all it brings. It's got a lot of classic lines. It's funny they talk about money men as possible politicians....hmmm. Anyway, it's makes a great statement about our current world where there seems to be no more middle class. Just rich and those who struggle. It sucks. But that's capitalism. "How much is enough? How many yachts can you ski behind? How much is enough?"