Sita's Agni Pariksha Story Explained Simply In 10 Minutes

Рет қаралды 32,519

Күн бұрын

Watch The Full Episode Here: • Yashodeep Deodhar On T...
Check out BeerBiceps SkillHouse's Podcasting 101 Course - bbsh.io/podcas...
Follow BeerBiceps SkillHouse's Social Media Handles:
KZbin : / @beerbicepsskillhouse
Instagram : / beerbiceps_skillhouse
Website : bbsh.in/trscli...
For any other queries EMAIL: support@beerbicepsskillhouse.com
In case of any payment-related issues, kindly write to support@tagmango.com
Check out my Mind Performance app: Level SuperMind
Android - lvl.fit/androi...
Ios - lvl.fit/iosdow...
Join the Level Community Here:
linktr.ee/leve...
Follow Yashodeep Deodhar's Social Media Handles:-
Instagram: / 21notes_valmikiramayan
KZbin: / 21notes
X: x.com/21Notes_R...
✅ Subscribe To Our Other KZbin Channels:-
BeerBiceps (English Channel):
/ beerbicepsofficial
Ranveer Allahbadia (Hindi Channel):
/ ranveerallahbadia
TRS Clips हिंदी (Hindi Podcast Highlights):
/ @theranveershowhindi
Best Of TRS :
/ @bestoftrs
Best Of TRS Hindi :
/ @bestoftrshindi
RAAAZ By BigBrainCo :
/ @raaazofficial
RAAAZ Clips :
/ @raaazclips
BigBrain Plus :
/ @bigbrain_plus
Link to our blog: beerbiceps.com/
This is a Ramayana special episode where we dive deep into the real Ramayana story and whether our knowledge of Ramayana is accurate or not. Today, we have with us Yashodeep Deodhar, an entrepreneur dedicated to studying the Valmiki Ramayana and emphasizing the importance of understanding the Valmiki Ramayana, the original text, as a historically accurate and biographical account of Lord Rama.
In this episode, he discusses the differences between the Valmiki Ramayana and other versions, including those found in popular media. Deodhar also provides insights into the nature of the Vanaras (monkey-like beings) and Rakshasas, arguing they were not distinct species but rather human groups with unique customs and attire. He explores the weaponry and warfare depicted in the Ramayana, suggesting that the text reveals lost technologies and advanced weapon systems.
This was an amazing episode, understanding the true Ramayana. If you love our history-based episode, then this one is for you. I hope you will enjoy this episode and let us know your thoughts in the comments section.
#ramayan #valmikiramyan
--
INSTAGRAM : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
FACEBOOK : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
TWITTER : @beerbicepsguy
/ beerbicepsguy
WHATSAPP: BeerBiceps
whatsapp.com/c...
LINKEDIN : @beerbiceps
/ beerbiceps
TELEGRAM: @beerbicepsguy
t.me/beerbicep...
SNAPCHAT: @beerbicepsguy
----------------------------------------------
About :
TRS Clips is a collection of SHORT CLIPS from The Ranveer Show podcast. Enjoy our latest knowledge-fueled videos from the BeerBiceps team. Every conversation on #TheRanveerShow is intellectual, deep & progressive. We cover everyone from entrepreneurs to Bollywood film stars to even athletes.
Today, The Ranveer Show or TRS - Happiness Through Curiosity. A show where we host the world's greatest success stories and try digging out their secrets to success. Every conversation is an EXTREME learning experience for the viewer.

Пікірлер: 104

@kafirNo01 3 ай бұрын

Your guest is a great storyteller. It is so engrossing and captivating listening to him. He should make a series of the whole stories of our epics/history both of them. It will help our younger generations even older people like us. 🙏🙏🙏

@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm 3 ай бұрын

Check his channel '21 notes' where he made a series on Valmīmi Rāmāyana.

@prema9169 25 күн бұрын

Jai sheee ram and jai mata sita

@lovereachable 2 ай бұрын

Ranveer is surprisingly quiet and thoughtful in this clip. Goes to show how great a storyteller the guest is. 😁❤

@ds7503 2 ай бұрын

Finally somebody who is actually speaking about this incident based on what was actually written in Valmiki Ramayan. People can’t digest facts in Kalyug.

@Myplaystations Ай бұрын

But bro whole point is ram never says sita to step into fire

@absurdist8 25 күн бұрын

@@Myplaystations But he says enough harsh words to her to make her do it.

@Myplaystations 25 күн бұрын

@@absurdist8 yes he knows what's he doing that's the reason he said lakshuman in sign language wait for it

@satyanarayana3111 Ай бұрын

Good to see someone speaking the truth amidst all the nonsense spread by people these days

@kanchanwelcomes Ай бұрын

U brought a great guest ... explanation was verse by verse..I wish I could learn from this person...great person.. perfect interpretation...❤

@akanxa1874 3 ай бұрын

People should realise, there are many altered versions and not to blindly believe in anything.

@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm 3 ай бұрын

He is narrating the Original Vālmīki Rāmāyanam.

@akanxa1874 3 ай бұрын

@@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm ohh guys really know nothing

@auroraabagel6168 2 ай бұрын

@@akanxa1874 and how do you know which one is 💯 % correct. We all just accept the version according to our biased beliefs.

@coveringeternity 2 ай бұрын

When blind faith backed by ignorance, uneducation and political motive.... It becomes dangerous...

@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm 2 ай бұрын

@@coveringeternity Your statement applies to dogmatic religions. Others do not work like this. Never have any Dharmik or other pagan religions triggered anything like Jihād or Crusade. Even today, have you heard a Hindu asking for war with Pakistan for Hinglaj Mata or Prahlad Mandir or for the city of Lava? Nope. And this was one of the reasons for which Roman Emperors converted - abrahamic religions are dogmatic.

@sayan4847 3 ай бұрын

Shree Ram took all the blame upon himself so that no one can say anything bad about Mata Sita in present and future generations yet some sickulars like Ranveer instead of false equivalence compare the Agnipariksha with the evil deeds and atrocities of Islam just for appeasement😔😢😡 without even knowing the context

@starauto4263 3 ай бұрын

lol how come islam came in this convo. lol

@sayan4847 3 ай бұрын

@@starauto4263 Because in one of the podcast when the guest(who was a historian) was scrutinizing the evil and dirty mindset of Islamic ideology then Ranveer like every sickular does tried to defend it for appeasement by saying "O then Ram also told Sita to take Agnipariksha" these were his exact words(without any context) so who are we to question on their bad omens and this is his reality

@bharathn1059 3 ай бұрын

@@Jsiienthat is not the Valmiki Ramayana , no where in Valmiki Ramayana it is mentioned don’t give fantasy stories from some bastard commies

@GSV27266 3 ай бұрын

@@Jsiien.It's foolish argument,never bring things without source .

@bluewaters2231 Ай бұрын

@@sayan4847 he is defi a sickular. all this is for name n fame but at heart his understdg is nil batte sanata.😊

@anupa1090 3 ай бұрын

This is the purity of sita ,so in this world every women should know this power of purity.....

@swatipriya562 3 ай бұрын

Tum apna purity dekho , you are no one to pass judgement

@mohitpatel9974 3 ай бұрын

@@Jsiienread Valmiki's Ramayana - which is original. Not stupid internet rumours

@anupa1090 18 күн бұрын

@@swatipriya562 🤭😊

@ravindrajetty7102 3 ай бұрын

The Scholar cites the verses and explains the scenes extremely well. Hats off to him. Please make more podcasts with him.

@gopaldhussa3226 3 ай бұрын

Anyone can form a verse and make it look legitimate. No such verse exist in original Ramayan. Please read original Ramayan. You will love it.

@Rohit-ij7mb Ай бұрын

@@gopaldhussa3226lol. He is narrating the original valmiki Ramayana

@sudhindrabukkebag7502 3 ай бұрын

सादर प्रणाम श्रीमान 🙏🏵️🙏 Thank you TRS clips

@shivam_s_sisodiya 3 ай бұрын

Send this video to vikas divyakirti...

@anshuman19anand 2 ай бұрын

धन्यवाद🙏 जय सियाराम 💞

@vedangmehta1371 3 ай бұрын

Jay ho sita maiya ki .....

@indhujar6609 3 ай бұрын

No matter how many Ramayanas come along, the one that aired on NDTV and Dangal TV in the period of 2008-2009 has a separate fan base and won 99% of Indian hearts. The Sita's image in this thumbnail is a witnessing that fact.

@piyushabhargava3486 3 ай бұрын

uttarkand was added later in Tulsi Ramayan. Valmiki ji doesnt mention Luv Kush or Sita ma being sent to forest

@cheemunlalldookheet94 3 ай бұрын

I am A bit confused.I have visited Sita Mahi near Varanasi where Sita went into the fire and a temple has even been built on the spot. Now I am learning that Sita jumped into the fire in Lanka itself. Pl. Enlighten me.😅

@sandeepmellacheruvu4688 2 ай бұрын

@@cheemunlalldookheet94 I think you are referring to Sita Marthi. It's the place where Ma Sita got absorbed into the earth. It's also called Sita Samadhi stal. This happened long after Agni pariksha and has nothing to do with Agni pariksha.

@bharathn1059 3 ай бұрын

Also there is one line missing here , Ram also says just like fire of deepam cannot be seen clearly by foggy eyes similarly my eyes are foggy, which is to indicate that he is viewing her(fire referring to Sita ma) from foggy eyes refers general public point of view how they view her and so he does not want to give chance to public to insult Sita ma and not accept her as queen in future ,and when people read this part of Ramayana they automatically blame Ram for this , hence he took the blame for it. Sita ma also knows why Ram is doing it , but they just follow the act for the citizens to revere the queen Sita ma. But just like humans are they just won’t change again later in utara Kand ppl again insult her

@sudhabk6013 3 ай бұрын

It's Agni pravesha. It is not Pariksha. Please change the title.

@swatipriya562 3 ай бұрын

We don't know how much verse are added later so can't say if these things are actual version

@SeattleMelody 2 ай бұрын

Brilliant 💯🌟

@-7x70 3 ай бұрын

Radhey Radhey 🙏💜💜🌼🌼🌹🌹

@vaishalimanchanda6514 2 ай бұрын

Then can you kindly explain Ram's thinking and behavior when he did Sita's pari-tyag in Uttar Kand? He knows everything ...agreed. Doesn't that make him look even worse when he tells Lakhsman to take Sita into the forest. HE COULD'NT PROTECT HIS WOMAN, it wasn’t her fault that she was abducted. Sita went to exile with Ram even though only Ram was exiled, to fulfill her duties being his wife, but he failed as a husband. He was more human than a God. Sorry...just my opinion.

@broadcastwithatg5195 2 ай бұрын

He says in his channel valmiki didn't write the uttrakand it is later addition in valmiki Ramayana

@simplyfygaming6172 5 күн бұрын

He already told Ram did that to for other people and not for himself. As other people are humans and humans have doubts, which are if not cleared can spread as rumours.

@nithyapalanisamy633 3 ай бұрын

Loved this!

@Expression24 2 ай бұрын

Ranveer’s face expressions …. Do not match the conversation…. I find them misplaced

@rezwanasultana4470 28 күн бұрын

The point is why does she has to prove anything. It's not about any religious belief. It's just a point.

@AdityaShekharMishra Күн бұрын

you can worry about your hadith and hijab respectfully speaking not tell you what to do just telling my point before pointing fingers at others faith look into your own🤡

@scoopidiboopz77z26 3 ай бұрын

Ram spoke harsh words against Sita in response to her questioning Lakshmana's motives for not pursuing Maricha's bait.

@Dillikidastaan 2 ай бұрын

Everybody should read the Valimiki Ramayan at least.

@SanjeeveRao 3 ай бұрын

There is a better version than this narration. Sita is Laxmi herself. In the ladder of hierarchy of souls, Ravana is very low in the rung and no one can be equal to Laxmi except Narayana who is greater. Ravana could not even touch Sita. She would have burnt him. When laxman rekha brought fire, sita was sent to the Agni Loka (world of fire) and am illusory sita was replaced. Ravana took that sita. Rama need not fight for sita. He fought to kill bad people. Abduction was an excuse. Then after war, they had to create fire and bring original sita.

@charlesdarwin5185 2 ай бұрын

Your explanation is not credible. If your wife runs away after you have been with another woman, and comes back pregnant. Who is the Daddy?

@sanjayangarai1624 Ай бұрын

In Which version of Ramayana includes this??

@charlesdarwin5185 Ай бұрын

@@SanjeeveRao this is mainly confabulation and not credible.

@charlesdarwin5185 Ай бұрын

@@SanjeeveRao what is a soul? Where is it?

@sujilegzeglier 3 ай бұрын

Amazing stuff

@parthchaturvedi8614 3 ай бұрын

Amazing❤

@karthi7016 3 ай бұрын

We need historians with peer review. Archeologicalists, theologians all peer reviewed.

@suvarnapatil7663 2 ай бұрын

Invite ani ghanatra in trs podcast

@suvarnapatil7663 2 ай бұрын

For real ramayana

@gopaldhussa3226 3 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, tgis man is narrating from that part of Ramayan which was not written by Maharishi Valmiki ji. In Valmiki Ramayan and in Ramcharitmanas both have simply stated that Ram ji asked the Lord Agni to return His Sita. Please read the correct version. Agni Pariksha is a big lie which is being taught to us since last few centuries.

@binamralamsal Ай бұрын

He is stating based on Valmiki Ramayan. The story you mentioned is in Ramcharitmanas but not in VR. Whatever he said in this video is based on VR.

@dayaniosho7063 3 ай бұрын

What happened after coronation ? Why did sita leave ayodhya ?

@charlesdarwin5185 2 ай бұрын

DNA fidelity. Paternity of her children was in question

@bethivenki 3 ай бұрын

This sounds little different

@cssuntherrao 2 ай бұрын

Sita was required to do agnipariksha & came out unscathed. People can argue about the wrong or right of her having to go through it. Maybe her deep love & respect for Rama & the deep faith of both, in dharma protecting them & also faith in Sita's purity made them go through with public etiquette. Firstly, a modern day Sita would have protested & not gone through it. Secondly how can anyone, however pure escape being burnt alive in fire, today. Teaches that in a different Yuga such things as not being burnt alive for purity happened. Most importantly, the discipline of what is rightfully & dharmically applicable for different times should be respected, whether in private or public life. What is right or dharmic is a matter of integrity and needs to be pondered about within. These ithihasas need deep pondering, also taking into account many factors.

@renukabalvalli4634 3 ай бұрын

But why did Rama sent Sita in the forests when she was pregnant?? After Luv Kush came in front of Ram why did he not accept them as his children??

@sai_charan 3 ай бұрын

There are also many others who have explained those topics.

@mohitpatel9974 3 ай бұрын

@@Jsiienhe didnt put her on fire, read original

@sai_charan 3 ай бұрын

@@Jsiien Just curious, which version of Ramayana did you read?

@charlesdarwin5185 2 ай бұрын

They were Ravana's children. Sita knew Ravana before she got married to Ram. When Ram was philandering in the forest, she ran away to Ravana. Ram knew that DNA fidelity has been broken.

@mohitpatel9974 2 ай бұрын

@@charlesdarwin5185 you people like wanting to be assholes isn't it? Deliberately changing stories to suit your agenda?

@Annie_R18 2 ай бұрын

Shree Ram is the incarnation of The God Vishnu, and Sita Maa is nothing but the Goddess Laxmi. Shree Ram and Sita are the one individual. They are not different. Shree Ram said, I know that Sita, the daughter of Janaka, who ever revolves in my mind, is undivided in her affection to me He further said, "The world would chatter against me, saying that Rama, the son of Dasaratha, was really foolish and that his mind was dominated by lust, if I accept Sita without examining her with regard to her chastity." Therefore, in order to convince the three worlds, I ignored Sita while she was entering in the fire.

@karthi7016 2 ай бұрын

A very different people's today as from Lord Rams time.