Sita's Agni Pariksha Story Explained Simply In 10 Minutes

Рет қаралды 37,693

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 120

@kafirNo01 5 ай бұрын

Your guest is a great storyteller. It is so engrossing and captivating listening to him. He should make a series of the whole stories of our epics/history both of them. It will help our younger generations even older people like us. 🙏🙏🙏

@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm 5 ай бұрын

Check his channel '21 notes' where he made a series on Valmīmi Rāmāyana.

@prema9169 2 ай бұрын

Jai sheee ram and jai mata sita

@satyanarayana3111 3 ай бұрын

Good to see someone speaking the truth amidst all the nonsense spread by people these days

@kanchanwelcomes 4 ай бұрын

U brought a great guest ... explanation was verse by verse..I wish I could learn from this person...great person.. perfect interpretation...❤

@lovereachable 4 ай бұрын

Ranveer is surprisingly quiet and thoughtful in this clip. Goes to show how great a storyteller the guest is. 😁❤

@akanxa1874 5 ай бұрын

People should realise, there are many altered versions and not to blindly believe in anything.

@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm 5 ай бұрын

He is narrating the Original Vālmīki Rāmāyanam.

@akanxa1874 5 ай бұрын

@@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm ohh guys really know nothing

@auroraabagel6168 4 ай бұрын

@@akanxa1874 and how do you know which one is 💯 % correct. We all just accept the version according to our biased beliefs.

@coveringeternity 4 ай бұрын

When blind faith backed by ignorance, uneducation and political motive.... It becomes dangerous...

@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm 4 ай бұрын

@@coveringeternity Your statement applies to dogmatic religions. Others do not work like this. Never have any Dharmik or other pagan religions triggered anything like Jihād or Crusade. Even today, have you heard a Hindu asking for war with Pakistan for Hinglaj Mata or Prahlad Mandir or for the city of Lava? Nope. And this was one of the reasons for which Roman Emperors converted - abrahamic religions are dogmatic.

@anupa1090 5 ай бұрын

This is the purity of sita ,so in this world every women should know this power of purity.....

@swatipriya562 5 ай бұрын

Tum apna purity dekho , you are no one to pass judgement

@mohitpatel9974 5 ай бұрын

@@Jsiienread Valmiki's Ramayana - which is original. Not stupid internet rumours

@anupa1090 2 ай бұрын

@@swatipriya562 🤭😊

@ds7503 4 ай бұрын

Finally somebody who is actually speaking about this incident based on what was actually written in Valmiki Ramayan. People can’t digest facts in Kalyug.

@Myplaystations 3 ай бұрын

But bro whole point is ram never says sita to step into fire

@absurdist8 2 ай бұрын

@@Myplaystations But he says enough harsh words to her to make her do it.

@Myplaystations 2 ай бұрын

@@absurdist8 yes he knows what's he doing that's the reason he said lakshuman in sign language wait for it

@habibveen Ай бұрын

@@absurdist8 No he didn't It's the author Valmiki who added agni pariksha version so that common people like us must stop doubting mother sita's character.. Sita was an innocent woman who had to face all the abuse with no fault of hers.

@ravindrajetty7102 5 ай бұрын

The Scholar cites the verses and explains the scenes extremely well. Hats off to him. Please make more podcasts with him.

@gopaldhussa3226 5 ай бұрын

Anyone can form a verse and make it look legitimate. No such verse exist in original Ramayan. Please read original Ramayan. You will love it.

@Rohit-ij7mb 4 ай бұрын

@@gopaldhussa3226lol. He is narrating the original valmiki Ramayana

@sayan4847 5 ай бұрын

Shree Ram took all the blame upon himself so that no one can say anything bad about Mata Sita in present and future generations yet some sickulars like Ranveer instead of false equivalence compare the Agnipariksha with the evil deeds and atrocities of Islam just for appeasement😔😢😡 without even knowing the context

@starauto4263 5 ай бұрын

lol how come islam came in this convo. lol

@sayan4847 5 ай бұрын

@@starauto4263 Because in one of the podcast when the guest(who was a historian) was scrutinizing the evil and dirty mindset of Islamic ideology then Ranveer like every sickular does tried to defend it for appeasement by saying "O then Ram also told Sita to take Agnipariksha" these were his exact words(without any context) so who are we to question on their bad omens and this is his reality

@bharathn1059 5 ай бұрын

@@Jsiienthat is not the Valmiki Ramayana , no where in Valmiki Ramayana it is mentioned don’t give fantasy stories from some bastard commies

@GSV27266 5 ай бұрын

@@Jsiien.It's foolish argument,never bring things without source .

@bluewaters2231 3 ай бұрын

@@sayan4847 he is defi a sickular. all this is for name n fame but at heart his understdg is nil batte sanata.😊

@anshuman19anand 4 ай бұрын

धन्यवाद🙏 जय सियाराम 💞

@shivam_s_sisodiya 5 ай бұрын

Send this video to vikas divyakirti...

@vedangmehta1371 5 ай бұрын

Jay ho sita maiya ki .....

@indhujar6609 5 ай бұрын

No matter how many Ramayanas come along, the one that aired on NDTV and Dangal TV in the period of 2008-2009 has a separate fan base and won 99% of Indian hearts. The Sita's image in this thumbnail is a witnessing that fact.

@meret99 Ай бұрын

Brilliant❤

@piyushabhargava3486 5 ай бұрын

uttarkand was added later in Tulsi Ramayan. Valmiki ji doesnt mention Luv Kush or Sita ma being sent to forest

@cheemunlalldookheet94 5 ай бұрын

I am A bit confused.I have visited Sita Mahi near Varanasi where Sita went into the fire and a temple has even been built on the spot. Now I am learning that Sita jumped into the fire in Lanka itself. Pl. Enlighten me.😅

@sandeepmellacheruvu4688 4 ай бұрын

@@cheemunlalldookheet94 I think you are referring to Sita Marthi. It's the place where Ma Sita got absorbed into the earth. It's also called Sita Samadhi stal. This happened long after Agni pariksha and has nothing to do with Agni pariksha.

@swatisreepanigrahy2100 Ай бұрын

But Luv and Kush went to aswamedha yagyan and recited ramayana taught by Rishi Valmiki then how come that portion is not there

@bharathn1059 5 ай бұрын

Also there is one line missing here , Ram also says just like fire of deepam cannot be seen clearly by foggy eyes similarly my eyes are foggy, which is to indicate that he is viewing her(fire referring to Sita ma) from foggy eyes refers general public point of view how they view her and so he does not want to give chance to public to insult Sita ma and not accept her as queen in future ,and when people read this part of Ramayana they automatically blame Ram for this , hence he took the blame for it. Sita ma also knows why Ram is doing it , but they just follow the act for the citizens to revere the queen Sita ma. But just like humans are they just won’t change again later in utara Kand ppl again insult her

@sudhindrabukkebag7502 5 ай бұрын

सादर प्रणाम श्रीमान 🙏🏵️🙏 Thank you TRS clips

@SeattleMelody 4 ай бұрын

Brilliant 💯🌟

@scoopidiboopz77z26 5 ай бұрын

Ram spoke harsh words against Sita in response to her questioning Lakshmana's motives for not pursuing Maricha's bait.

@nithyapalanisamy633 5 ай бұрын

Loved this!

@swatipriya562 5 ай бұрын

We don't know how much verse are added later so can't say if these things are actual version

@Dillikidastaan 4 ай бұрын

Everybody should read the Valimiki Ramayan at least.

@-7x70 5 ай бұрын

Radhey Radhey 🙏💜💜🌼🌼🌹🌹

@sujilegzeglier 5 ай бұрын

Amazing stuff

@parthchaturvedi8614 5 ай бұрын

Amazing❤

@Annie_R18 4 ай бұрын

Shree Ram is the incarnation of The God Vishnu, and Sita Maa is nothing but the Goddess Laxmi. Shree Ram and Sita are the one individual. They are not different. Shree Ram said, I know that Sita, the daughter of Janaka, who ever revolves in my mind, is undivided in her affection to me He further said, "The world would chatter against me, saying that Rama, the son of Dasaratha, was really foolish and that his mind was dominated by lust, if I accept Sita without examining her with regard to her chastity." Therefore, in order to convince the three worlds, I ignored Sita while she was entering in the fire.

@karthi7016 5 ай бұрын

We need historians with peer review. Archeologicalists, theologians all peer reviewed.

@suvarnapatil7663 4 ай бұрын

Invite ani ghanatra in trs podcast

@suvarnapatil7663 4 ай бұрын

For real ramayana

@SanjeeveRao 5 ай бұрын

There is a better version than this narration. Sita is Laxmi herself. In the ladder of hierarchy of souls, Ravana is very low in the rung and no one can be equal to Laxmi except Narayana who is greater. Ravana could not even touch Sita. She would have burnt him. When laxman rekha brought fire, sita was sent to the Agni Loka (world of fire) and am illusory sita was replaced. Ravana took that sita. Rama need not fight for sita. He fought to kill bad people. Abduction was an excuse. Then after war, they had to create fire and bring original sita.

@charlesdarwin5185 4 ай бұрын

Your explanation is not credible. If your wife runs away after you have been with another woman, and comes back pregnant. Who is the Daddy?

@sanjayangarai1624 3 ай бұрын

In Which version of Ramayana includes this??

@charlesdarwin5185 3 ай бұрын

@@SanjeeveRao this is mainly confabulation and not credible.

@charlesdarwin5185 3 ай бұрын

@@SanjeeveRao what is a soul? Where is it?

@sudhamuralidharan6574 5 ай бұрын

I rqte Sita higher than all .

@karthi7016 4 ай бұрын

A very different people's today as from Lord Rams time.

@Expression24 4 ай бұрын

Ranveer’s face expressions …. Do not match the conversation…. I find them misplaced

@rezwanasultana4470 2 ай бұрын

The point is why does she has to prove anything. It's not about any religious belief. It's just a point.

@AdityaShekharMishra 2 ай бұрын

you can worry about your hadith and hijab respectfully speaking not tell you what to do just telling my point before pointing fingers at others faith look into your own🤡

@Kanvichan Ай бұрын

The thing is if prove nahi kiya tho ppl are going to talk shit however they want to save from that they did this so that it will shut up the ppls mouth

@abhijit1509ibskol 14 күн бұрын

The point is they are public figures who are not irresponsible, public opinion mattered... This is careful public opinion moulding for PR issues during those years!

@rezwanasultana4470 13 күн бұрын

@@AdityaShekharMishra You missed the point. Read again

@rezwanasultana4470 13 күн бұрын

@@AdityaShekharMishra You don't tell me what I should be worried about. Unlike you I respect all religious beliefs and respectfully follow mine. It's you and people like you creating confusion. People who can't respect other people's opinion are not needed here.

@dayaniosho7063 5 ай бұрын

What happened after coronation ? Why did sita leave ayodhya ?

@charlesdarwin5185 4 ай бұрын

DNA fidelity. Paternity of her children was in question

@SomeoneOfficialReal Ай бұрын

That's never happened

@hypatia123456 5 ай бұрын

Here agni pravesh is not in ayodhya...its in lanka?

@SivEndzeit 3 ай бұрын

i am 35 years old male and a virgin, hopefully someday i would marry a virgin hindu girl....

@bethivenki 5 ай бұрын

This sounds little different

@renukabalvalli4634 5 ай бұрын

But why did Rama sent Sita in the forests when she was pregnant?? After Luv Kush came in front of Ram why did he not accept them as his children??

@sai_charan 5 ай бұрын

There are also many others who have explained those topics.

@mohitpatel9974 5 ай бұрын

@@Jsiienhe didnt put her on fire, read original

@sai_charan 5 ай бұрын

@@Jsiien Just curious, which version of Ramayana did you read?

@charlesdarwin5185 4 ай бұрын

They were Ravana's children. Sita knew Ravana before she got married to Ram. When Ram was philandering in the forest, she ran away to Ravana. Ram knew that DNA fidelity has been broken.

@mohitpatel9974 4 ай бұрын

@@charlesdarwin5185 you people like wanting to be assholes isn't it? Deliberately changing stories to suit your agenda?

@sudhabk6013 5 ай бұрын

It's Agni pravesha. It is not Pariksha. Please change the title.

@gopaldhussa3226 5 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, tgis man is narrating from that part of Ramayan which was not written by Maharishi Valmiki ji. In Valmiki Ramayan and in Ramcharitmanas both have simply stated that Ram ji asked the Lord Agni to return His Sita. Please read the correct version. Agni Pariksha is a big lie which is being taught to us since last few centuries.

@binamralamsal 3 ай бұрын

He is stating based on Valmiki Ramayan. The story you mentioned is in Ramcharitmanas but not in VR. Whatever he said in this video is based on VR.

@cssuntherrao 4 ай бұрын

Sita was required to do agnipariksha & came out unscathed. People can argue about the wrong or right of her having to go through it. Maybe her deep love & respect for Rama & the deep faith of both, in dharma protecting them & also faith in Sita's purity made them go through with public etiquette. Firstly, a modern day Sita would have protested & not gone through it. Secondly how can anyone, however pure escape being burnt alive in fire, today. Teaches that in a different Yuga such things as not being burnt alive for purity happened. Most importantly, the discipline of what is rightfully & dharmically applicable for different times should be respected, whether in private or public life. What is right or dharmic is a matter of integrity and needs to be pondered about within. These ithihasas need deep pondering, also taking into account many factors.

@Jacqueline.Soraya 5 ай бұрын

🙏🏻

@shivamdubey4262 5 ай бұрын

🙏🙏

@vaishalimanchanda6514 4 ай бұрын

Then can you kindly explain Ram's thinking and behavior when he did Sita's pari-tyag in Uttar Kand? He knows everything ...agreed. Doesn't that make him look even worse when he tells Lakhsman to take Sita into the forest. HE COULD'NT PROTECT HIS WOMAN, it wasn’t her fault that she was abducted. Sita went to exile with Ram even though only Ram was exiled, to fulfill her duties being his wife, but he failed as a husband. He was more human than a God. Sorry...just my opinion.

@broadcastwithatg5195 4 ай бұрын

He says in his channel valmiki didn't write the uttrakand it is later addition in valmiki Ramayana

@simplyfygaming6172 2 ай бұрын

He already told Ram did that to for other people and not for himself. As other people are humans and humans have doubts, which are if not cleared can spread as rumours.