2025 Atomic Bent 100 On Snow Ski Review at Pico Mountain with SkiEssentials.com

[@joelhawkins3580]

Definitely add reviews like this to your usual rotation, its awesome seeing the skied and reviewed at the same time

[@SkiEssentials]

Okay! We've done more over the past two seasons and spoiler alert, we like them too!

[@ljshoreslokal]

My QST98's are giving me the mad-eye right now while I'm watching this video and loving the Bent 100's!! I really like my Bent 90's now that I've lost weight and don't push through them in the turns. I love this format, thank you!!

[@SkiEssentials]

There's enough love to go around for all these wonderful skis!

[@austinado16]

I really enjoyed watching you guys push the skis, and hearing your (very grounded) commentary. Thank you!

[@SkiEssentials]

thank you! And as an update, I skied the new Bent 100 here at Stowe in the woods on Friday and Saturday and it was awesome!

[@chrisgravel7157]

Love the changes Atomic is making to key skis and adding a Maverick 105 & 115 - their killing it for 24-25. Loose and playful in the trees and can rip GS turns? 24 Rustler 9 is pretty close at least in the 186 for this 185lb lb expert. Love the sound of ths new 100 for my son who wants a playful ski but consistently find himself hauling butt. Or for the swath of friends that are Advanced and want something fun that helps them expand their off piste tree- bump repitoire.

[@SkiEssentials]

Agree! The whole new tip shape and construction for the 2025 Atomics is great!

[@aishaa9418]

This ski resort looks fantastic, such.a terrain! The review is very helpful and interesting, thank you!

[@guspachio4977]

Love the videos, this format…well done!

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks! These are fun to do!

[@jehjay2600]

GREAT REVIEW!!! Love the format and all the info..

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks so much!

[@tonylewis1803]

One important point that you brought up in previous models was the price point to value. I own a pair of 2023’s and I love them. The price was around 450. previous years making them, to me, the best ski, hands down for the price. Yes, they may have made a bit better ski, but they want 200. more for the improvements. But we also have to figure in the environmental benefits of materials being used which may be like organic vs. non-organic produce where the enviro- friendly materials cost more?

[@chriscowan6630]

Love this format guys! Terrific content and great review...I have the old model...may need to pick these up!

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks! It definitely feels like a different ski with a different sound--that was one thing that I didn't love about my own Bent 100's--they just felt a bit hollow. The new ones feel more woody.

[@philippefagnant1841]

Would not mind those videos to be like 45min.thx to the whole team.

[@SkiEssentials]

Ha! We'd just have to take a few more runs and we might get there!

[@TheOriginal1234]

Are you going to create a video specifically on the mount points? That would be awesome, especially for this pair of skis!

[@SkiEssentials]

While providing information about what we choose to do with mount points is something we've shared in the past, we're also very aware that this is a personal thing and is mainly a journey skiers must take themselves. If applicable or notable in a specific ski, especially if that ski has multiple lines, we'll generally talk about it. If a ski has one line and is more of a directional shape, we feel that's the proper point based on the ski's intended engineering and application.

[@Travelling_wm]

When is the 2025 Bent 90 coming out? Haven’t seen it for sale anywhere.

[@SkiEssentials]

We'll probably see those in our main order later this summer. Unchanged except for graphics, so feel free to pick up a 2024 if you're itching! www.skiessentials.com/products/2024-atomic-bent-90-skis-w-tyrolia-attack-14-gw-bindings?ski%2520size=157

[@Travelling_wm]

I have the 2023.. I love them but, the new graphic on the 25 Bent 90 looks amazing… all of the new bent graphics are awesome looking for the 2025 line.

[@tyler.corbiere]

I’m roughly 185lbs and just over 6’ tall. I like hitting a little bit of everything all over the mountain from starting with a challenge on the double blacks out of bounds, to bombing groomers to get that speed rush but my favourite is playing around the whole mountain, finding small jumps to hit through the trees and what not and just adventuring trying to do small tricks like 360’s all over the mountain or 180’s, nothing crazy as I only hit park like 5-10% of the day typically but I’d like to get better at bigger jumps eventually. Would these be good for my style? Or is there something you guys would recommend over these bent 100’s?

[@SkiEssentials]

These are sweet for what you're looking to do. I'd also check out the Nordica Unleashed 98 for slightly stronger performance, and then the Line Chronic 101 for more playful tips and tails. But you are in the right spot for sure.

[@tyler.corbiere]

@@SkiEssentials I’ve been looking into those faction mana 2’s as well, what are your thoughts on those? I really like the black color way so I’m in between those and the bent 100’s

[@Kandalf8989]

Hi Jeff Hi Bob. Did you guys notice any flex difference in the tail, knowing the fact they added finally a bit of tail rocker... ? I sold in January my bent chetler 100, honestly didn't like the ski at all, and have some high hopes that the new chasis changed for better.. Tail rocker in bent 100 18-24" gen felt like a brick, and made ski dive a lot, having super soft tip, and super stiff tail with almost no rocker, making hard to ski bumps. Also doing 180's was hard rather than 360.. As well as turning while skiing switch. Also mounted my bent 100, same as Jeff at +6, just to make enough length for almost empty tail rocker.

[@SkiEssentials]

I think it's easy to say that I certainly prefer the new Bent 100 to the old one--the longer wood core and added tail rocker are two of the main culprits for sure. I don't think it's a totally different ski, so if you didn't like the old one at all, you will likely feel roughly the same way about the new one. I don't think the +6 is doing you any favors in deeper snow, perhaps leading to the diving characteristics and sub-par mogul performance.

[@richardcole4776]

Loved it ! Two snaps up in a circle! (but don't misinterpret this reference, lol)

[@SkiEssentials]

Men on Skis? Is that what you're going for? We'll have to find a ski we dislike so we can say "Hated it!"

[@richardcole4776]

😆😆😆@@SkiEssentials probably best you don't go down that road. But, seriously, the chairlift format with the three of you has been really enjoyable and informative!

[@jameswharton6276]

Love the review guys. Gonna pull the trigger on these shortly. 6' 200lbs, Advanced east coast skier skiing mostly bumps, tight trees and variable terrain at Mad River. Should I go 179 or 186?

[@SkiEssentials]

I still think it's okay to go long on these skis if you're in the middle. I'm 6/2 225 and love the 186 for bumps and trees here in Stowe.

[@connershore2842]

Great review. I’m in the low intermediate group and haven’t skied a ton, but progressed really quickly this year. I like to try and ski all mountain but it’s just hard when you get the rentals at the resort. Would you think this could be a good ski to buy and grow into? I have been told I will have issues turning on the ski as a newer skier. Also looking at the blaze 94. Thoughts between the two? 5’7 155-160 pounds

[@SkiEssentials]

It is not difficult to turn, it's more that it doesn't carve hard on firm snow as well as some other skis, but just turning it is very easy. The Blaze has a bit more pop and zest to it, and some more grip as well. The Bent is more playful while the Blaze is more precise. Based on what you're looking to do, it does seem like the Blaze is a slightly better fit, but you have two very nice options here. I'd go 172 in that ski, maybe 165 if you're less aggressive.

[@Aleksy79]

Great reviews - recently discovered this channel. Do you have any views why (apparently) in US you test / ride more of wider skis (so significantly above 80mm), when at the same time in Europe they only try to sell me those race / slalom carving skis (70mm or less). I see that you also mostly test on the slopes (groomers), so this is not potentially the freeride aspect. Greetings from Germany

[@SkiEssentials]

We talk about this from time to time. There's more marketing energy in Europe behind the pure and narrow carvers, and I think that's because racing is more a part of the culture. Here in North America, the concept of freeride seems more important to the manufacturers, hence the wider emphasis. As such, we also find that freeride is a subjective term and more of a style of skiing based on where you are and how you ski. While things like the Freeride World Tour can certainly put their own definition of the term and have a strong foot to stand on, most skiers can at least access these same feelings and sensations in less than extreme conditions and terrain.

[@mikestanley4457]

It’s like you knew I was looking at these skis today.

[@SkiEssentials]

A big part of the job is knowing what every single skier wants to see at each and every specific moment.

[@legoben1998]

Do y'all know when these will be available to order?

[@SkiEssentials]

We ordered them a few weeks ago and requested them as soon as possible. Check back soon!

[@yamaha120sd]

Great review! Love it! How would you asses touring capability with shift bindings? Looking for a 80/20 skis that can handle all conditions possible and I'm torn between these and qst echos.

[@SkiEssentials]

No issues! The Echo 106 is going to be a better pure floater but I'd rather ski the Bent 100 in a day to day situation, especially here in Vermont. If you're seeking out deep snow for this setup, then it's tough to go against the wider and more rockered Salomon.

[@yamaha120sd]

@@SkiEssentials Thanks a million! You guys are the best!! 🤙

[@lucashrabal4953]

What do you think about the bent 100 vs the QST 98?

[@SkiEssentials]

I think there's still more substance to the QST and more style to the Bent. If you're looking for better flotation, stronger carving performance, and a sturdier overall feel, the QST is a slightly more reasonable choice. But for playful and creative skiing, it's tough to beat the new Bent.

[@kokibr91]

I hope you get them to the studio and compare with the old model side by side. Change in shape and rocker would be nice to see next to the outgoing model. Questions arise. Given the tail rocker I guess now they ski a bit shorter than the old ones? The old model felt surprisingly long for such a playful ski. Weight is also something to consider. Are they heavier? This would affect touring capability. I wish they have put 120 sizing but anyway, personal preference.

[@SkiEssentials]

I think the added density to the core and especially in the tip makes more of a difference than the tail rocker. The new ski is a bit heavier than the old one, about 20 grams per ski, so not a whole lot. I didn't find the 186 to ski shorter than the 188.

[@surfmarko]

I love this type of review. How well do they carve vs the 2023? I really hated the 2023 Bent 100s and sold them because they skipped and chattered so much when I tried to stop and they were so squirrelly. The looked amazing and were super lite though. I ended up selling them for cheap.

[@SkiEssentials]

You're getting an extra 100 grams or so per ski, so the sturdiness in a carved turn should be better. Fortunately, we never got to ski them on a firm trail or any type of groomer so I can't really tell you.

[@tomdegraan998]

Looking forward to your thoughts on the maverick 105. Also how do these compare to the Origin 96/101 now?

[@SkiEssentials]

Regarding the 105, the move to the CTi build makes it a very stiff and strong performer. For how well it floats, it's incredibly light and maneuverable, but also stiff and sturdy. This is a high-octane ski and will make a lot of aggressive skiers very happy. As for the Origin/Bent relationship, the Atomic is still more flexible in the tips and tails. The Origin is smoother and quieter with slightly higher end performance.

[@petrosbass7357]

What length would you recommend to a 6.1" advanced skier? Thinking about mounting a shift or a tecton and use it as a hybrid ski. I'm also a bit confused about where to mount the bindings since the recommended line is a bit t forward.Have you tried -2 from recommended? Keep up the good work Fellas.

[@SkiEssentials]

I think the 186 is fine--these skis are still light and mobile so it's okay to go a bit longer. I would stick to the line unless you are sure about your -2 preference.

[@petrosbass7357]

@@SkiEssentialsRoger that

[@joris7124]

Hi guys really enjoyed the video thanks, im looking for the lightest-feeling, most easy and quick ski in the ~110 category for this year. Stability is still kind of a thing for me, i want it to feel lively and poppy. Currently on a Chronic 2021, now wanting a more powder-dedicated, wider buddy. What do you recommend? Big love guys!

[@SkiEssentials]

If you're going close to 110, looking for blending light and stable, I had a wonderful time on the Line Bacon 108. They also make it in a 115, but that might be on the wide side? Head Kore 111 is also worth a look!

[@LucasBassFishing]

what are all of your specific daily driver skis for New England?

[@SkiEssentials]

Interestingly, while we do own skis, most/all of the time we're on some sort of demo ski. I use a Head Kore 93 as my personal ski since it morphs skiing by myself and skiing with my kids very easily. I love the lightness and high performance character. Jeff mainly will ski a Nordica Unleashed 98 and Matt loves his Salomon QST 106.

[@pawelsz4825]

Hi, would you recommend BCh 100 2025 + shift 13 bindings as an ubiversal ski for slope and one day touring?

[@SkiEssentials]

Yup! Nice and light, floaty, and well-rounded--makes a great ski for this application especially when paired with a nice hybrid binding like this.

[@jnilloc]

Hi guy. How does this compare to the volkl blaze series, such as last years 106. I'm far from an expert in gear but sounds like both are a lighter weight, on the middle of the road or just under (but not cardboard) ski that are designed to excel on soft snow? both have decent amounts of rocker and limited metal. are both also pretty solid on harder stuff, excluding the sheet ice? keep up the great vids. Thanks!

[@SkiEssentials]

Yes, they are pretty similar, although the Bent 100 isn't nearly as good of a pure floater as the Blaze 106. The Blaze is a bit more directional in nature--it's not as creative or playful as the Bent 100. I think if you're mixing on and off-trail skiing, the Bent has a lot to offer but for powder and soft snow specifically, the Blaze 106 is a better option.

[@benferguson8098]

I'm thinking about picking up a pair for the trees and a quick turner...but unsure on what length to choose. I'm 5'8" at 145Lbs. Feel like I'm stuck between the 165cm and the 172cm. Average skiing abilities. I like off trail, small drops and jumps. Any thoughts or recommendations?

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd think the 165 will offer more satisfaction overall.

[@ericmcafee4766]

Hey there, I know these posts are everywhere. I’m 5 9’’ around 160-165. Should I grab the 172s or 180s? I like trees, jumps, and bumps probably a bit more than steep carving.

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd go 172 based on your stats and application unless you know you prefer longer skis.

[@flick7402]

Looking for advice here. I used to ski a faction CT 2.0 2022 (102) in 178 which I mounted dead center. Even tho the skis lost a lot of carving power with this mounting point i liked them way better because they were extremely responsive and playful. I then purchased a Black Crows Atris 2022 (108) in 184 which I mounted at the recommended spot as these are my touring set up. After trying the set up my conclusion is that it carves well on groomer but I am extremely disappointed by the off piste performance. They ride well in powder but feel very heavy and slow on the trees. They are also the opposite of playful. I am an advanced skier on the east coast, i ski strong but only weight 150lbs at 5’10. I am thinking of remounting the skis with regular fix on a spot close to dead center. Do you think this could make the skis feel more alive? Or maybe I should size down to 178? Please let me know as I heard the Atris were amazing but I don’t enjoy them at all right now.

[@SkiEssentials]

It's also possible that the Atris just isn't a ski for you! I do think that moving the mount forward would make it closer to the CT because they should be pretty similar skis.

[@klank67]

I'm on the Maverick 95ti - 180cm and they are tons of fun!!

[@SkiEssentials]

Great grip and energy in those skis for sure!

[@klank67]

@@SkiEssentials I picked them after watching your reviews and you're spot on! Thanks everyone :)

[@joehumphries_]

Thanks for another great review! On another 2025 topic, I was surprised to see that Liberty has moved factories and is changing their entire lineup, including ditching the popular Origin series (one of my personal faves). Do you guys have any plans to introduce/review the new skis?

[@tomdegraan998]

Really?

[@joehumphries_]

@@tomdegraan998 yep, according to their instagram

[@SkiEssentials]

We'll certainly be taking a closer look at Liberty's wholesale changes. I skied the Radian 92 and Scope 104 the other day and really enjoyed the Radian--wasn't really a Scope day. They've also ditched the bamboo and vertical metal, relying more on poplar and horizontal metal now. Radian has a highly mobile shape to it and fits my style of shorter turns and more energetic skiing quite well. It's also very interesting in the Radian line, specifically, that the core profile thickness is a lot thinner than that of Evolv.

[@mikestanley4457]

Do you guys carry LiB tech skis? I wondered what your thoughts on them were. Looking between the UFO 95, Rustler 9s, and Camox

[@SkiEssentials]

We do not carry that brand--they look great to me! Between Rustler 9 and Camox, I can tell you that there's a bit more pop and pep to the Camox while the Rustler prefers to be bent in a rounder shape and style. I'd rather ski the Rustler in softer snow and trees but I love the Camox from an overall/well-rounded standpoint with a ton of fun.

[@garenmanoukian8415]

Considering these new 100s for this season. 5'11'' at 155 lbs. Do I go with the 179 or 186. Advanced skiier.

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd say 179 would be a better choice for your stats and application.

[@chrism9976]

Haven't skied since the late 90s. Old school freestyle skiier. 6'2", 190. Used to ski Rossignol 4M 190 cm mogul skiis. What size do you recommend for new school big air tricks?

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd go 186 in these skis. They're pretty light and mobile, so it's okay to be a bit long.

[@chrism9976]

@@SkiEssentials Thanks. Seems like a fun ski. Would love to see your review on the different mount points.

[@kingluk812]

Would it be worth waiting for this new version? Or go for the discount current version?

[@SkiEssentials]

Since this is an incremental improvement and not a wholesale change, I think getting the current version will make sense for those looking to get a good deal!

[@jesseb5822]

Great video! Between these and Maverick 95s for PNW wet and heavy snow. Mainly on piste intermediate trying to advance and venture into trees a bit. 5’9 180, any recs?

[@SkiEssentials]

You might find better success with the Maverick, especially since you're mainly on-piste and in heavier snow if off. These skis will be a lot more fun and interesting in the trees, but if that's not a majority of your time, it's harder to recommend the Bent over the Maverick. I'd look to the 172 in that ski.

[@jesseb5822]

Sweet thanks!

[@nrager]

As of now, is the additional cost of the 2025 compared to the 2024 worth it? I am looking to pick up a new pair of skis and am stuck on if I should spend the extra money on the 2025.

[@SkiEssentials]

That's more of a question for your financial advisor. I can say that from a skiing perspective, the 2025 is a better ski. This does not mean that the 2024 is all of a sudden a bad product--it works darn nearly as well. We currently have the 2024 version for $454.97 while the new ones look to retail at $649.95. For me, I don't think that it's $200 better, but that's just my opinion given my relationship with my bank account. www.skiessentials.com/products/2024-atomic-bent-100-skis-w-tyrolia-attack-14-gw-bindings?ski%2520size=164

[@nrager]

@@SkiEssentials thank you for the great, timely reply. I’ll definitely take this into consideration.

[@brooksralph1096]

How would you compare these new bent 100s to the QST 98? I’ve been leaning towards the QST 98 for a little more stability and stiffness but seems like they may be pretty similar now

[@SkiEssentials]

I still don't think it's very close. QST is considerably more substantial than Bent in terms of build and stiffness. The Bent only gained about 20-40 grams per ski and while it helps with stability, it's not a totally different thing. If you want something that holds up to more aggressive skiing in variable conditions and terrain, as well as having more edge grip, I'd still lean to the Salomon.

[@brooksralph1096]

@@SkiEssentialsI ski mainly in Wisconsin and upper Michigan and am hoping to have at least one trip out west a year. I’d consider myself an intermediate skier and enjoy going in the trees, side hits, butters, but also rip groomers with family. I’m around 210 lbs, which would be better?

[@llSkyzxll]

Would you recommend the last year's pair as they are currently on a heavy discount near me? I'm 6ft3 190lb what length ski should I go?

[@SkiEssentials]

It's not a totally different ski. If you find a last year's at a price, I'd go for it! 188.

[@llSkyzxll]

@@SkiEssentials thanks!!

[@llSkyzxll]

@@SkiEssentials hi may seem weird, but how long do skis like this generally last if taken proper care of? Never owned my own pair and am curious

[@SkiEssentials]

@@llSkyzxll There's a lot of factors at play here. Use rate, intensity, care, the unknown...the list goes on. If we're assuming that an average skier skis about 10 days per year, then the skis should last at least a few seasons before they start to lose energy, but you can certainly make a pair last a lot longer than that.

[@llSkyzxll]

@@SkiEssentials about a week a year, maybe more if I'm lucky :)

[@CC-ys8qq]

What purpose would the bent 100 have vs. the nordica enforcer 99? Similarities/differences? I know the stoutness of the Enforcer has it's advantages but I've never tried the Bent 100 and wonder if it would fill the gap of a more playful ski in the trees/bumps and just be an overall easier ski to use vs the Enforcer, my fear would be to give up the edge hold and just general solid feel of the enforcer if you know what I mean enforcer is trustworthy, how would this bent compare?

[@SkiEssentials]

playfulness and ease of use are two big highlights of the Bent 100. On firm snow, it can't quite stand up to the Enforcer 99 by a long shot in terms of grip or stability. The Bent needs slightly softer snow in order to compete, otherwise it's not a fair fight.

[@outvid]

Compared to the Black Crow Camox?

[@SkiEssentials]

The Camox is stiffer consistently from tip to tail. This makes it more reactive and more stable, especially with the added weight. I think that more aggressive skiers who like to open it up a bit more will enjoy the Camox while those that fall more into the freestyle and creative realms will fare better on the Bent 100.

[@outvid]

Thanks! @@SkiEssentials

[@markkim4841]

bent 100 vs arv 100, they seem like similar skis. What are the differences and what kind of skier would want one vs the other? Thanks!

[@SkiEssentials]

The ARV 100 has a bit more pep and zest to it than the Bent 100. Skiers looking for more energy out of their skis will likely gravitate to the ARV while those that feel that smoother performance is a higher priority will enjoy the Bent 100. Overall, very similar applications and styles.

[@rickden8362]

The greater rocker, tip and tail, of the Bent along with it's thinner core and 1 less glass layer will make it more forgiving than the ARV. Whereas the convers of this makes the ARV more peppy and lively. You can compare the 2 on soothski(thanks Matt).

[@tidal8665]

hey i was wondering if you guys could review the 4frnt devastator some time soon. much appreciated 💯

[@SkiEssentials]

We had a great time on the Switch and the MSP 91 this past year--we should definitely reach out regarding other models including Devastator.

[@darinsmith2458]

It looked like you guys had a fun review..

[@SkiEssentials]

It was!

[@Wrgb1]

How would this compare to the armada ARW 106 UL or Line vision with somewhat similar weights.

[@SkiEssentials]

The Bent feels slightly sturdier than those other skis, and while the Armada is the floater of the group due to the shape and profile, the Bent is the most versatile, and for here in Vermont, I'd rather ski the Bent most of the time unless faced with deep snow.

[@delriv5238]

Pico is a fun mountain

[@SkiEssentials]

Summit Glade is my favorite run by a good margin. We also got over to Upper Giant Killer (fantastic trail name) and it was pretty much untouched and a special ski experience.

[@BenGreen-h8u]

Hi guys, Currently skiing a faction CT 2 for general all mountain freeride type skiing in Europe, looking to buy this new bent 100, my question is 179cm or 186cm I’m 5’11 and 195lbs Many thanks

[@SkiEssentials]

I think 186. It's a bit over head high, but I think that's okay on this ski, especially if a feeling of stability is important to you in a ski.

[@kgbzee]

style tip. what brand is that forest green git up he has on?

[@SkiEssentials]

That is a Black Crows Freebird XPore top and bottom suit. Very techy!

[@AudioAdvisory38]

Hmm. Not on topic of Bent 100 specifically so likely DNQ. However, brought up the mention of getting my ski team mounted (Jeff talking about mount points) this year, while the shop intake staff was insistent that I wanted a center mount. And how this applies to your video, beyond that I just like some knowledge and it is fun to watch the skiing, it likely doesn't. But I was fairly promptly told; top sheets are not always set consistently on a set "pair" of skis. I was shocked, because suddenly I realize, they were dead right. I was then promptly "bullied" into, 'if you are mounting twin tips, you have to be in the park.' Hahaha. Dead. I'm dead. Hahaha. Guess I ski park now.

[@SkiEssentials]

So yes, we do see topsheet graphics that are not lined up. It's always best to measure each ski from the tail to find the precise mount point that you want. If the factory line on a Bent 100, for example, is -6 from true center, then you do have to measure the entire ski and then work from the tail on each. That said, there's really only truly symmetrical park skis that are ultimately best served by a true center mount, and that's done mainly by supreme preference for total equality and balance. That's like .02% of the twin tip population. Most skiers ski on non-symmetrical twin tips with more all-mountain oriented mount points. Enjoy the park!

[@RRAkita]

When will you have this 2025 bent 100 or 90 for sale?

[@SkiEssentials]

The 90 gets a new graphic but no structural changes. www.skiessentials.com/products/2024-atomic-bent-90-skis?ski%2520size=157. The 100 and 120 get build updates, and we have the 100 in stock in the 186: www.skiessentials.com/products/2025-atomic-bent-100-skis-aa0030338?ski%2520size=186

[@brennanlindsay3589]

Will you guys ever review ON3P skis?

[@SkiEssentials]

We're always on the lookout for testing brands like ON3P but since we're not a dealer of the brand, we don't have as much motivation to actively seek it out. What's your favorite ON3P ski and why do you like it?

[@brennanlindsay3589]

@@SkiEssentials I am from the Pacific Northwest right outside of Portland. With ON3P being a local company and also being made here makes them appealing. I haven’t been able to ride any of their skis but was surprised to see you hadn’t reviewed them yet. When on the lifts I’ve talked to quite a few people with them and they always have good things to say. Out of all of their offerings I’d probably be most interested in seeing a review for the Jeffrey 100 or Woodsman 100. Both these models tailor toward what I personally like to ride. With your guys knowledge and extensive background on testing skis I’d be interested to see where these models stack up.

[@karsonricelli1492]

Question..... How do these compare to the liberty Evolv100? I'm bob's size and charge hard.

[@SkiEssentials]

The Evolv has more smoothness and stability for sure. The square tail and low profile tip make the Liberty a wide front side ski, in essence while the Bent 100 is still strictly in the creative and freeride zone. If you are my size and charge hard and aren't looking for as maneuverable or playful ski, the Evolv is a more relevant choice.

[@karsonricelli1492]

@@SkiEssentials thank you! I currently own the evolv plus most of the origin line from liberty. My only complaint, as you stated with the evolv is that it gets kinda tough to maneuver in bumps and in tight trees, but I primarily use it as a hard pack, front side ski

[@mariantepes1117]

So overall would it be worth it over the 24 model

[@SkiEssentials]

I think there is about a 10-15% increase in performance overall with the 2025 model. If that is worth it to you to wait and spend some more money, I'm not going to talk you out of it! Nothing is suddenly wrong with the 2024 ski, though.

[@iblaster1o1]

what skis should i get if i send hills but hit jumps also?

[@SkiEssentials]

It's nice to have somewhat of a twin tip like this Bent 100. I'd also look to something like the Nordica Unleashed 98, Rossignol Blackops 98, or the Black Crows Camox.

[@mikestanley4457]

How do we feel about these vs the ripstick 96?

[@africanjew1596]

If you’re good at skiing then avoid the bents

[@mikestanley4457]

🤣🤣🤣 good to know. My focus has shifted more towards the ripstick vs Maverick 95

[@SkiEssentials]

There's more pop and pep and energy out of the turn in the Ripstick as it's got that more directional tail shape and carbon rods. If you're mixing on and off-trail, the Ripstick will deliver more precise carving performance. If you're playful and creative and looking for a fun-loving ski, it's tough to go against these Bent 100's.

[@kesinzimmerman]

Hey, any idea where +6 is in relation to dead center? Thanks!

[@SkiEssentials]

It's probably one back from center.

[@roryberger]

Did the zero line move at all from the old model? Agree it would be helpful to reference from true center. Looking forward to further park info and comparisons.

[@brand13007]

How would these compare to the blizzard rustler 10?

[@SkiEssentials]

I personally prefer the playfulness and ease of use of the Bent, but the Rustler is smoother and more stable. For here in Vermont, the 100 makes for a better every day ski, especially if you like the bumps and trees, while the Rustler operates better in deeper and softer snow at a higher rate of power.

[@brand13007]

Thanks! That helps a lot!

[@brand13007]

Definitely looking at the getting the bent 100. Is it worth it to wait on the ‘25s or go for a discounted ‘24?

[@SkiEssentials]

@@brand13007 The 24 is still a very good ski and if you're more budget conscious then I say go for it. That said, I have skied the 25 these last few days/weeks and love it. Definitely an improved build and feel.

[@Ma0i]

Mounting point?

[@SkiEssentials]

The Factory line seems to work great on this ski. More forward for more creativity, but I don't think I'd go back.

[@thomas-wq9pl]

Want size do i get im 184 cm and 81 kg average skier

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd go with the 179 based on your stats and application.

[@africanjew1596]

I don’t think I’ll ever buy bents as their tips will chatter at high speeds… many other great light skis which that won’t happen to…

[@SkiEssentials]

It's the well-roundedness that sticks out here--I don't think anyone's buying these to access stability and power at speed.

[@KyleRattay]

Same cookie cutter skis too light for goood performance atomic is making or printing $$$ with these

[@SkiEssentials]

I mean, they could charge more--the 2024's before price drop are $649 which is not in the upper end of ski prices these days. And the great bulk of the market out there will find more than adequate performance with this ski. I would hedge a bet that it's a very successful model for them, financially, yes.

[@timothyharrison-l9h]

someone tell that guy to buckle his boot before his toes get cold!!!