2025 Men's Mid-90 mm All-Mountain Ski Comparison with SkiEssentials.com

[@captpinstripe]

Love these guys, watching Jeff flex a ski vs Bob only begins to tell how they compliment each other, their passion and knowledge no one can match and thanks to them we are able to make smart choices. Bravo

[@corbel793]

The preseason excitement starts with a SkiEssentials lineup review. Keep up the great work and cheers from western Canada

[@reginarosander7655]

Totally agree😂. Excitment builds up gradually until snow on the ground mid November... cheers from Sweden.

[@alastairstephen6048]

I think these are best reviews on the net. I got myself a pair of Blizzard Rustler 9's last season on reco from you lads and they are the best skis i have ever owned they do anything and go everywhere. Thank you for all the effort you go to putting these reviews together.

[@ADHski]

The days are getting shorter...

[@adamradley4407]

Chill in the air most night...

[@charlesreuther2916]

2.5 hours and no coffee break - props!

[@arviddistner3017]

I’ve got 2 pairs of skis and can’t get more, but I still love watching these, I began to get better knowledge before buying but now i just love watching

[@beeegeeedeee]

Appreciate how much work you all put into the reviews, great job and what a great job to have.

[@TheMirrorVision]

You guys did a great job as always! Love the look of the new Black Crows graphics, and have been eyeing the Serpos since last year.

[@spontaneousexploration]

Hey Bob! Thanks for dropping wisdom at the warehouse sale. I ended up with a new pair of Enforcer 94 172's. Now I'm anxiously awaiting seeing some snow on Mansfield.

[@raymondmsenecal]

Jeff for the 457th time: “hey skiers 👋” Me as if actually know him: “what up Jeff 🤙”

[@NibbleSnarph]

I was in shambles yesterday, happy to see it today!

[@SkiEssentials]

KZbin processing took longer than I expected so had to push it to today.

[@troypeterson27]

Love the depth & thoroughness guys!

[@arpadhamori711]

Very happy, that you're back! Worldclass videos! THX for your hard work!

[@SkiEssentials]

More to come!

[@arpadhamori711]

@@SkiEssentials Just can't wait the 84-93 category!

[@esief1970]

As always, the best reviews on the net.. nice job boys!

[@frankstrobel4350]

even though I am not in the market for new skis...I always like watching theses videos

[@Connor-lt2ql]

This is like watching Birdman. You absolute legends, thank you!

[@bbomer3777]

Just bought the rustler 9 and I am sooo pumped for this ski season!

[@sebastienbeau5783]

The Rustler 9 are great. Got them for a year now, great fun !!!

[@michaeloneill5824]

Jeff...That turn at 1:46:50!!!! Very cool!!!

[@danrohm5643]

THEY BACK!!!! 🎉🎉

[@carterfan80]

Agree with jeff 100% about Maverick 95. Soft spring snow day at Heavenly was amazing on this ski. Couldn't think of a better choice. Grips and rips. Great directional ski.

[@JB-wu1wd]

I love you guys!

[@Bushwacked487]

Thanks guys! A vote for mid 80s or 90mm next.

[@brucerehberger9080]

Great job of reviewing all of those skis! Mercy! One of the things I really appreciate about your reviews is that you talk about the weight of those skis.....something other reviewers totally omit. The weight of the skiis is just as important as the length and waist width. I believe the long term trend will be towards lighter skis. So thanks for the info.

[@christophermagnuson1270]

Oh boy is this great❄️⛷the new intro rocks

[@RobertJoynt]

Thanks guys!

[@SkiEssentials]

Thanks for watching!

[@Mr_Dusty]

That turn at 23:22 was so sick!

[@SkiEssentials]

Almost lost it in that soft snow!

[@Mr_Dusty]

@@SkiEssentials You literally aired like 10 feet into the turn, so rad!

[@AudioAdvisory38]

hahaha yeah. another caught the part where it almost ripped his leg off. :)

[@joshuamcdonnell122]

Totally agree about the K2 Mindbenders. Super fun ski and crushes the trees. Not for bombing hardpack groomed trails but perfect for the end of the day what the snow is all cut up.

[@Surfandski11]

Y’all are the best.. thx

[@philippefagnant1841]

2 and a half hour!! Let's fucking go!!

[@markantony3875]

Nordica Enforcer: I downsized all the way down to a 165 last year. However I ski mostly in New Hampshire where many ski areas have very narrow, tight trails. You guys in Vermont have wide superhighways for trails in comparison. LOL. As long as you keep it on edge, very stable even in a 165. Sounds like the new model will be even more stable.

[@bearclaw5115]

Kudos to Bob for hustling that Mantra M7 through the bumps. I thought I was watching in 2x!

[@SkiEssentials]

Credit is due to spring bumps and well-formed lines!

[@barnesheyward8824]

Oh sweet joy

[@NikoWolak]

Any review of the bent 90 coming soon? Loved the vid btw happy to see bob back in the mix

[@SkiEssentials]

It's on the wall right now as we get ready for the 90 mm comparison!

[@TheWingedflurry]

just grabbed last years line optic 92 without the metal, hoping I made the right choice for my hard pack, mess around tree ski. maybe should have gone with the 96 but only time will tell

[@msal-45]

Hey Jeff and Bob, really appreciate and learn a lot from these lineup videos. Have you ever thought of doing a vid on the skis you each own personally and why? Curious to see what you guys choose to own after having tested hundreds of skis.

[@SkiEssentials]

We've done a few over the years--I (Bob) need to update this year: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3S0n3ehgZJ1n7c kzbin.info/www/bejne/iqSUkJeJo92hg9E kzbin.info/www/bejne/fWKUnYyDps14jpY

[@markfriedman8892]

Another great comparison. Def getting QST 106 on your rec but need a 93/94 ski. Love my FX 96 ti and their feel but need the tail a touch more releasable so looking at the Paragon 93. Can you compare the Paragon 93/Mpro 94/Serpo or anything I need to consider? Didn't love the declivity 92 or rossi 94ti & Black Edition tip too soft but ski great. Stormrider out of the budget since I am getting 2 pairs of skis this season but demoed them and they are pretty sweet. Ski in CO, ski the groomers to the back bowls. Snowed Thursday & Copper opening Nov 8th! Looking forward to the next video. Thx as always.

[@SkiEssentials]

Paragon and Serpo are pretty similar, probably more smoothness and stability in the Paragon with more zip in the Serpo. The M-Pro is rounder in nature than either of the other two. I'd say the Serpo will be a great complement to what you have and is different from the skis that you didn't like.

[@pauljeitler7678]

Hey guys, I need your advice! Been waiting for this review/comparison for weeks - thank you so much for doing these every year! I'm looking for a new daily driver, on piste ski that offers more high speed stability than what I had until now. I'm 5"4, 135 lbs, advanced skier, likes to go fast and already has 3 pairs of skis. What I skied until now: 2011/12 Völkl Wall in 161 (87mm under foot with 16m radius) with center mounted Marker bindings as my main piste / hard pack ski 2012/13 Armada TST in 165 (100mm underfoot with 12,6m radius) with -5 mounted Marker bindings my second main ski that I use in spring, in light pow or every day in the afternoon when the little hills form from all the people pushing the snow around. 2017/18 Armada JJ Zero in 175 (116mm under foot with 16m radius) with - 5 mounted Marker bindings as my pow (15" or more) and touring ski. Völkl and the TST carve WONDERFULLY, like a GS weapon! But at high speeds they get chattery and unstable and they don't love it when it's icy... I'm looking for a more stable ski for hardpack and going fast. I think around 78-87mm with an 18m radius or a tripple radius would be ideal. I don't want a hardcore piste ski like an Atomic Redster or similar. Offpiste performance is of zero concern with this ski. If it were versetile enough for the soft afternoon snow and bumps it would be neat but It doesn't have to be fantastic at that. The skis I'm considering: Armada Declivity 82 Ti Armada Declivity 88 C Armada Declivity 92 Ti Atomic Maverik 88TI Black Crows Captis Blizzard Anomaly 88 Blizzard Brahma 82 Elan Wingman 86 Black Edition Elan Wingman 86 CTI Nordica Enforcer 89 Rossignol Experience 86 Ti Salomon Stance 84 Salomon Stance 90 Völkl Deacon 84 Völkl Mantra 88 Can anyone be of assistance here? 😬

[@SkiEssentials]

This is a big list. I do think you can chop some fat by sticking to the more front side-oriented skis of the group. I'd narrow focus to the 2025 Volkl Peregrine 82 or V.Werks (upgraded version of old Deacon 84), Elan Wingmans, and then a few of the narrower all-mountain skis, so Blizzard Anomaly 84 (new Brahma 82) and Declivity 82 Ti. I don't think the other skis are as fitting as what you're describing your application to be, although there are a lot of fantastic all-mountain skis on this list.

[@superboost1574]

You guys need some beers for these

[@SkiEssentials]

Need all focus and concentration.

[@ktraughb]

I'm very surprised Liberty got rid of the Evolv90. That ski has been my favorite for a long time. A carving ski in its own category. I'd like to get my hands on another 2021 pair in 172. I absolutely loved that ski for all mountain. The base last year was different and not as fast, no matter what waxing I did.

[@SkiEssentials]

Yeah, I'll miss the 90 as well. I just don't think it caught on even though it is super smooth and powerful. Weird about the bases--maybe needed a different stone pattern?

[@ktraughb]

@SkiEssentials possibly. I love skiing, but all that stone grind base sruff is beyond me. They were very grabby when I used them last year. The base looks very different, not as plastic like as models past.

[@OB2Kenobi]

Bob, as someone with the same build who skis very similarly to you, I would be interested in hearing your personal top five, across all widths. We already got one in the Camox. Don't be afraid to include the non-mainstream picks!

[@SkiEssentials]

Generally, I like skis in the mid to upper-90's range, so I can easily take 5 from there. Camox, Unleashed 98, Justis, Enforcer 99, and Kore 99 are right there. If you're wondering about different widths, I'd say that in ~90 mm range, Anomaly 88, ~105 mm I like the Blaze 104 or Sakana, mid-80's the Nordica Steadfast 85 or Montero AR. In the ~110 wider skis, Declivity X 108 and Unleashed 108.

[@OB2Kenobi]

@@SkiEssentials Super helpful! Thanks!

[@samedhadzic3630]

As someone who has used these reviews to get my powder ski I found it very useful, just had a quick question on which one of these would be the best for piste riding/every day ski.

[@SkiEssentials]

While "best" is highly subjective, I'm a huge fan of the Black Crows Serpo and Stance 96 for blending energy and grip. Enforcer 94 for power and smoothness.

[@samedhadzic3630]

@@SkiEssentials How would you say the Kore 93 compare to the Stance 96 when it comes to on piste performance. Like carving for example.

[@SkiEssentials]

@@samedhadzic3630 The Kore 93 is an interesting ski. It is very light and stiff. If you have either the weight or the skill to flex it, you get amazing rebound and grip in a carved turn. If you don't have one of those aspects, the Stance is a more well-rounded and universal ski with broader appeal.

[@ethanmasse7740]

Thank you for the quality reviews. Which ski would you recommend for a ex racer, looking for a playful, midweight yet carvable ski for all conditions in Colorado? Possiblly interested in touring as well

[@SkiEssentials]

In this range, I think the Stance 96 makes good sense--you want the stability of the metal but not an overly heavy ski like the M7 or Enforcer. Paragon 93 is right there as well.

[@ethanmasse7740]

@@SkiEssentialsthank you!

[@MillsapsFan]

Would I gain much off trail performance going from the qst 92 to the new rustler 9? I assume carving on trail would be a little better.

[@SkiEssentials]

You'd gain a touch of float in soft snow, but you're not gaining much else. If anything, QST is quicker. Rustler is absolutely the superior carving ski. You'd gain there for sure, where off-piste is more just different rather than better or worse.

[@fynnderallereschte7991]

Hey First of all i love your Videos. Im looking forward to buy a qst 92 would you recomend Thema Or would you recomend me any of the skis instead. I am looking for a 60 powder 40 groomers

[@SkiEssentials]

QST 92 is a fantastic ski, although if you're really spending 60% of your time in powder, it might be worth bumping up to the QST 98! More float, better shape for deep snow, and still can hang on a groomer.

[@fynnderallereschte7991]

@@SkiEssentials thanks for your oppinion love your contant Keep it up ❤❤

[@fynnderallereschte7991]

Would a Salomon Strike 12 work Witze the qst or would u recommend an other skibinding

[@bearclaw5115]

@@fynnderallereschte7991 Not sure of your body weight but a simple answer would be to get a Strive 14 and have your bases covered.

[@SkiEssentials]

@@fynnderallereschte7991 Strive would be great!

[@Ready-r8n]

Hey guys, I've been skiing the Stormrider 95s for years and love them and think the new model would be even better. But if I wanted the same kind of feeling with a little more float in softer conditions, what would you recommend? Thanks!

[@SkiEssentials]

I do think the Stormrider 102 is worth a look if you like the feel of the Stockli skis. Blizzard Rustler 10 and Armada Declivity X 102 are two of my favorites in this range as well.

[@damageinc.3695]

I'm an expert former pro skier. I can't for life of me figure out what to buy in this category. I need an all mountain, about 14-18m radius pair I can take on the groomers and ski chop/off groomer runs with to the point where the powder isn't bottomless. I sometimes do this on slalom skis rather than my big wide skis that just hurt my knees and clank around anytime they aren't in full on powder. For groomers and working while coaching I use any number of slalom skis but I want something for most days up on the whole mountain. I only find rocker useful (marginally) in all out bottomless powder. Any thoughts? Am I thinking about this wrong? My all time favourite pair for this was the original red and black head monsters (circa 1999-2001 or so). You could charge them into any kind of crud and groomers, even ski bumps with them (not well but it worked). They would do just fine in almost all powder conditions too if you knew what you were doing...

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd put in a big vote for the Anomaly 94, Enforcer 94, or M7 Mantra. Pretty much anything here has rocker--that's just the going rate of ski shape these days in this width category. You're getting close to the 18-meter arc with these, although the M7 and Enforcer feel like they are more capable in the mid-radius range.

[@MacMadnessx]

i'm looking to buy my first ski's? pretty experienced. would like to do 90% piste with a bit of park and leaning more to the fun side of things. the armada arv 94's look great. or would these be a bit too park heavy? i'm 171 cm and weight 73kg

[@SkiEssentials]

While they do excel in the park, we find the thicker core profile and sturdy feel also translate well to all-mountain performance. I'd go 171 in that ski and have fun!

[@res_ipsa-REX]

When are you guys going to review the Octo??

[@SkiEssentials]

Individual, in-depth review probably won't happen until December, but we will have it in a Comparison video and in our Ski Test results, which will be live SOON! It's a fun ski. It's a nice progression from the Vertis. It's kind of like taking a Vertis and giving it a Mirus Cor tip. It initiates similar to the Mirus Cor, but it's straighter through the tail and softer flexing, so it finishes a turn differently. Actually allows for more turn shapes than the Mirus Cor, but doesn't quite get the super round turn with the strong finish like the Mirus.

[@res_ipsa-REX]

@@SkiEssentials Thanks for the analysis. I will keep my eye out for the ski test and comparison info in the near future.

[@lineskis]

Grab the popcorn folks!

[@SkiEssentials]

We've been pretty Line heavy in the Mid-100 and Mid-90 so far!

[@cube11112222]

Amazing review, thanks! Which of these would you say is the best east coast bump and tree ski?

[@SkiEssentials]

I'd prefer the ARV 94 or the Blaze 94 for eastern bumps and trees.

[@DavidGiambarresi]

For someone who has absolutely loves ripping a 182cm Rossi Experience 100, what’s the best replacement? Enforcer? Serpo? Really looking for a fat GS ski and forcing it to work everywhere.

[@DavidGiambarresi]

Hmm or storm rider?

[@SkiEssentials]

Stormrider is the closest shape and I can pretty much guarantee you won't be disappointed. Enforcer would be a pretty good choice too. Serpo makes beautiful turns, but doesn't feel as much like a wide GS ski as Enforcer or Stormrider IMO.

[@douglasdavies9756]

Awesome video. Any experience of the Zag Mata Ski? Looking for a 1 ski solution for European skiing. Piste but variable conditions.

[@SkiEssentials]

We've seen them but have not skied them. Looks like they fit well in that category for sure.

[@BenDavenport-sg5mt]

I’ve had volkl m5 for last six years loved the ski. Looking at the m7 for upgrade for new season. Can you advise me on the main differences please.

[@SkiEssentials]

There's a lower profile in the M7 and this makes for smoother transfer of power from boot to ski, and from turn to turn. It's got a shorter turn feel overall, with more energy out of the tail. Somehow, they made the ski crisper and more eager to carve with a more compliant feel in softer snow and crud.

[@BenDavenport-sg5mt]

Can you recommend a ski bindings for m7.I’ve seen the marker jester 16 is it worth the extra money?

[@SkiEssentials]

@@BenDavenport-sg5mt it's not like the Jester 16 offers better performance than the Griffon 13, but there is a sense of confidence that comes with the higher DIN binding. You're paying for the confidence.

[@Ethan-ue2xb]

I'd love to see you guys talk about the Faction Studio in one of these comparisons.

[@SkiEssentials]

We'll have the Studio 2 in the ~100 comparison.

[@theoutsider6191]

Hey guys, can you tell me if the Oblivion 94 is the same ski as last season except for the new topcoats? So design of the ski otherwise unchanged?

[@SkiEssentials]

Yes, same ski, just new graphics!

[@theoutsider6191]

@@SkiEssentials Nice one. Thanks 🙂

[@jakub09]

hello guys, I've been skiing Vertis for 5 years and I'm looking for something similar, only with better edge hold on hard and icy surfaces. I am 194 cm tall and weigh 86 kg. Could you give me some advice?

[@SkiEssentials]

Are you looking for wider as well, moving into this mid-90's category? If so, I would say the Black Crows Serpo is a very logical next step. Armada Declivity 92 and Salomon Stance 90 are also wonderful options. In the mid-80's. the Rossignol Arcade 84 and Blizzard Anomaly 84 are amazing skis.

[@jakub09]

@@SkiEssentials yes, stance 90 are first in my shortlist, I'm also thinking about maverick 88, I'm more drawn to playfulness and medium-long arcs. Will I make a mistake if I decide on maverick?

[@twinstwins5211]

Hey guys! Huge fan of your reviews! For an advanced skier from Quebec, 5.6 height 170 pounds, which one would you recommend for mainly on piste , but really good for that spring skiing slush and different conditions but that you don’t have force at every turn.Was leaning towards the enforcer 94 or the new m7 mantra

[@bearclaw5115]

I don't know the answer to your question but I doubt it is the Mantra or the Enforcer. Maybe Ripstick Black Ed. because it pulls you into turns on its own and stiff enough and shaped correctly for slush.

[@SkiEssentials]

The Enforcer and M7 are on the demanding side of the spectrum. If you're looking for a very sturdy and stable ski like that, then go shorter. For something similar in shape and style but a bit more amenable to mobility and versatility, I'd look to the Stormrider 95 or the Maverick 95. Just a bit lighter and easier to wrangle.

[@twinstwins5211]

Thank you! You guys rock!

[@JoeyAdams-i2j]

I got the Ranger 96 a couple seasons ago. They were fun for half a season but I eventually found them too loose and the tips too floppy. I’m going to replace them with either the Storm Rider 95 or Paragon 93 m. I’m looking for the most versatility for 50/50 days at Alta/Byrd. I’ve got 2018 Kore 105 in 189 that I really enjoy for ‘deeper’ days. Thoughts between the SR and Paragon?

[@SkiEssentials]

While you have two fantastic options here, I'm not going to talk anyone out of a Stormrider 95 if it's on their list--it's so incredibly smooth and predictable with excellent power and dampness. The Kastle is wonderful, but a bit louder and more pingy than the Stockli.

[@davidg1234567]

Hi guys, I'm wondering if there's much difference between the enforcer 94 173 vs 179. I'm 6" and about 87kg.

[@SkiEssentials]

The stability and power remains quite similar, it's the turn shape and the comfort at speed that differs most. The 173 gets the shorter arc, so prefers more slalom-like turns. The 179 will like to run a bit more, with more of a GS style. I think your stats put you in either, it's more about turn shape preference.

[@choski76]

Best site

[@Ready-r8n]

Hey guys, love love love these videos, super helpful, super informative. But question re the Stormrider: in the video you allude to this and say it in the Chairlift blog "While other heavy hitters on this list may outgun the Stormrider from a pure performance standpoint, none can match the smoothness and silence of the premium Stockli." It's not clear to me, what other skis are you referring to? Thanks!

[@SkiEssentials]

In the mid-90's skis like the Nordica Enforcer 94, Volkl Mantra M7, and Blizzard Anomaly 94 all qualify as heavy hitters.

[@Ready-r8n]

@@SkiEssentials Many thanks. I've been skiing the Stormrider 95s for years and love them and think the new model would be even better. But if I wanted the same kind of feeling with a little more float in softer conditions, what would you recommend? Thanks!

[@SkiEssentials]

@@Ready-r8n Slightly wider, you could simply look to the Stormrider 102, but there are other good options here. I'd check out Salomon QST 98, Blizzard Rustler 10, and Armada Declivity X 102.

[@teleturner207]

Am I crazy or was some of the footage not at stowe? Kore 93 in particular

[@SkiEssentials]

Not crazy! That footage is from Waterville Valley.

[@bearclaw5115]

I was wondering that too! I was like hey where did all those pines come from?

[@bpb5593]

Can I get a quick comparison on Rustler 9 and Ripstick 96 Black? Carving groomers at high speed, stability, and maneuverability in tight trees, etc. Thanks again!

[@GrampyScott]

New Rustler 9 everyday

[@SkiEssentials]

The Rustler is more consistent and smooth from tip to tail while the new Ripstick 96 Black Edition is more flexible in the shovels. The Elan is still quite peppy and energetic, and also light for great mobility. If you're carving groomers at high speed and are looking for stability, the Rustler is probably the ski you're looking for as it still keeps the tight trees intact.

[@robertvilter9196]

Would like to hear more discussion comparing the Enforcer 94 vs 99, including in respect of conditions in which one may excel over the other in the NE and skier ability. Thanks.

[@Bushwacked487]

More soft snow go wider. More normal snow go narrower. That’s the universal rule.

[@SkiEssentials]

There's really no difference when it comes to skier ability. Both are burly, strong, and incredibly powerful. I find the 94 just a tad easier to turn in more medium radius arcs while the 99 can run straighter and flatter with more confidence. For here in Vermont, it's tough to go against the 94 for most days while the 99 just has a bit more of a freeride character for this upcoming year with the added tail rocker and slightly wider platform.

[@robertvilter9196]

Thank you!

[@richardgeraghty7407]

Hi Guys, after a bit of advice. Im a dynastar fan have the CHAM 108 as my off piste ski and a GS Pro for piste. Id now like a ski to go all places is the new 94 what im after?

[@SkiEssentials]

That's the idea behind the new 94--supreme versatility. Great on-trail grip and carving power, fun off-piste performance, and a well-rounded design that handles variety and variation quite well. Definitely a good mix of the GS and the 108.

[@austinmoran456]

I skied 3 feet of powder in the woods with the 2024 rustler 9's and spent the rest of the year in VT on groomers. If you are afraid of wrinkles from smiling, do not buy this ski.

[@horsebeef]

How would you compare the dancer 96 to the m pro 100?

[@SkiEssentials]

M-Pro feels a lot more lively for sure, easier to release the tail edge too. More versatile, in my opinion. Dancer is stronger overall and has more vibration damping. Better at high speeds on firm snow, but not as dynamic or versatile.

[@horsebeef]

@@SkiEssentials very helpful, thank you!

[@markfriedman8892]

Guys another question. If I found some extra cash could you compare the Stormrider 95 to the Paragon 93? Prob quieter that's their formula but what's else would be the differences and pros/cons? Thx

[@SkiEssentials]

The noise level is the most notable change. The taper of the shovel in the Paragon is the next biggest one. Since it shares shape with the freeride-based ZX 92, it has a very floaty character. This comes through in the shovel as it has longer and more dramatic taper, as well as rocker, versus the more traditionally shaped Stormrider.

[@chadridsdale9970]

So the ripstick black is the dampest, smoothest carbon ski. How damp and smooth compared to an enforcer 94 or declivity 92 ti? I have an enforcer 88 and LOVE how it loves to attack bad snow. While I appreciate light weight skis, I hate the noisy pingy sound and feel. I much prefer a quieter damp feel. Thanks🎉 again

[@SkiEssentials]

It's not there. I think the Head Kore series is considerably more damp than the Ripstick Black, for what it's worth, and those hold up much better compared to the Enforcer/Declivity.

[@patowens-r7f]

Hi guys, really like your reviews. Maybe you can help me with my next super critical ski choice. Sierra bred skiier for the last 60 years. Non race background. 5'10" 230#, mostly on piste, going to 2nd season at 3 vallees this year, whoop! I have been on 184cm x 86mm volkol rtm 's from like 2018 ish, the black ones with the silly vibration damper. Loveeed em. I thought they were great carvers. I could ski powder just fine, great skiis. But I hit a rock at VT and blew out an edge. Soooo..... I guess my old ideal skiis are big shaped skiis. I skiied a big pair of Triple XXXs for many years and that seems to have imprinted on my ski psyches, talk about a BIG shaped ski! I saw the deacon 84 and the maverick 88, kendo 88? some others. what to do what to do? And maybe I don't want to ski on solid metal mass plankers, I like the idea of the colin chapman light is fast thing. My enemy is the alp ice, at my best and with sharp edges this is my skiing rubicon. got to work on that ice. Keep up the great reviewing. Thanks Pat

[@SkiEssentials]

Definitely check out the new Peregrine 82 and the Mantra 88 (just a Kendo). I think the 88's are intriguing because they seamlessly tackle ice and are versatile. Peregrine is more married to the hardpack.

[@cams3425]

Great video and excited for the season to start. Curious if Bob ever got on the 186cm size of the Rustler 9 and had a better experience of not pushing through the tips?

[@SkiEssentials]

I have not skied the 186 in the Rustler 9 but have put quite a bit of time on the Rustler 10 in the 186. I think I can make a fairly good estimate of the 9's performance in that length, and I'm pretty sure that the extra 6cm would add a good deal of stability and predictability to the ski.

[@cams3425]

@@SkiEssentials Gents, I'm looking for some advice/recommendations. Currently I ski my 2020 QST 106 as my daily driver (in Colorado and Utah mainly) and enjoy skiing mainly off trail. Love pow bowls, bumps, trees as my go to terrain. I'm trying to become a better on trail carver and the QST 106 has to be skied in the center to carve (or at least at my level I can't lean to hard on the tips or tails without washing out). I looking in this mid 90s category for a very good carver on trail but would hate to have a one dimensional ski since I truly love off trail skiing. I'm thinking of Rustler 9, Salomon Stance, Blizzard Anomaly and possibly Fischer Ranger. Thoughts? Recommendations? Also, I only have Shift bindings on my skis so a good lighter alpine binding recommendation would be helpful as well. Thank You!

[@cams3425]

BTW, I'm 6' and 180 and consider myself an advanced skier always moving towards an expert but not there.... :-)

[@SkiEssentials]

@@cams3425 If you're looking to keep it slightly lighter, you could easily narrow focus to the Stance and the Rustler. Between those, the Rustler is the more playful option while the Stance is quite a bit more precise. I think if carving is more of a priority here, seeing as though the 106 exists in your quiver, the Stance makes good sense to me.

[@SkiEssentials]

@@cams3425 I think the 182 in the Stance 96 is a fantastic option

[@moodied]

What are your heights and weight? It will help with all the reviews and your length favorites.

[@vanderdim]

Would be helpful to have them in the video descriptions

[@SkiEssentials]

I (Jeff) am 5'10" 160 lbs, Bob is 6'2" 225 lbs. We've talked about that a lot over the years, but maybe time for a refresher as we do have a lot of new subs.

[@moodied]

@@SkiEssentials Put those details in the description, As you are the goto reviewers. I think you both are the best and most detailed out there. My one-stop shop!

[@chrislovell7448]

Stockli Stormrider 95 is a great quality ski, but terrible in anything fresh and over 3". It's a terrible floater but awesome carver. I use mine mostly on blue-bird days at Deer Valley ripping groomers.

[@brianverschoor1161]

Good stuff here! In search of a replacement for my 19/20 Kore 93. Really interested in the Maverick 88/95. I am 6’2” 265 and really like the feel of a lighter all mountain ski. Will the maverick support my weight as well as the kore does? Would width matter in terms of stability in this ski? I would probably prefer the 88 width for east skiing but not opposed to the 95 if it would better suit my build. This ski will complement a redster q9 in my quiver. As always great video, can’t wait for the 88-92 comparison! Edit: Should I just leave the carving performance to the q9 and pick up a qst 92?

[@SkiEssentials]

Ha! Love the second guess at the end. First, I do think the 88 will hold up to your stats in the 184. You could go 188 in the 95 if you want more stability, but it just doesn't turn as well as the 180 or the 88 in the 184. Same type of light performance as Kore, so this is a nice move. Second, I do think there's plenty of difference between the Q9 and the Maverick 88 (or other skis in this range)--no need to go with a more freeride-based option like the QST.

[@brianverschoor1161]

@@SkiEssentials Thank you for the feedback, I think the mav 88 is the way to go then. Only other ski I was looking at was the Stance 90. Am I correct in assuming the mav 88 is a little more versatile for east skiing?

[@pport]

Does anyone have any insight if the Elan Ripstick 96 - Black is too light for a 6'4 225lb skier. Looking for an all mountain ski that is stable and not too chattery at speed (groomers) while also being able to turn tightly in trees and hold up in powder. Thanks

[@SkiEssentials]

I'm 6/2 225 and I struggled with the softer shovel of the 96 Black for 2025. I'd check out Stance 96 and Line Optic 96.

[@Maximal05]

@SkiEssentials i am looking for new skis. I‘m from Europe and most of the time on piste but i like to try more off piste stuff. The Rustler 9 is very interesting, do you think this would be a good choice or do you know better alternatives? Thanks and greetings ⛷️🎿

[@SkiEssentials]

It's a very good choice. The metal handles the firm snow and the progressive shape takes care of anything soft or manky. They're both fun and high-performance at the same time. In this range, similar to the Rustler, I'd also check out the Line Optic 96 and the Fischer Ranger 96 as comparisons.

[@zumi1993]

Thanks for your great reviews! I want to get a new all round ski, 70% for slopes 20% park 10% outlands. Id go for Bent 90, Oblivion 84 or 94. Im riding for more than 20 years and want to start with park sort of things and play a little more on the slopes. In reviews they say that the Bent 90 is a little poor quality. Is this true? If so, would you recomment Oblivion 84 or 94 for me? Thanks a lot!

[@SkiEssentials]

The Oblivion skis certainly feel more stout and better constructed--most skiers who put casual use on the Bent 90 will never notice. The Oblivion 84 is a standout, though, with a stiffer flex, increased camber, and thicker sidewalls than the 94. If you are spending most of your time on the trails and in the park with minimal soft snow, the 84 is a league above most other skis in this category.

[@zumi1993]

@@SkiEssentials thanks for your fast response and your opinion !

[@smartcar8]

A little off-topic but - I have another length question. I'm 5'10" (but light - 140 lbs) and can't decide between the Salomon Stance 84 in 169 or 177 length. . I'm 67 and an intermediate skier and ski primarily in the east. thanks for any advice. ( I love these comparison vids!)

[@SkiEssentials]

The stats and application are leaning to the 169 in this ski.

[@smartcar8]

@@SkiEssentials Thanks!

[@johnsutherland3191]

Great Video Jeff and Bob. Im still on some Volkl Bridge 187 from 2014. Im 6th4 and 92kg. Loved them. So hard to find something like them. Great all mtn ski good and groomies and great in powder or off piste. Would a Volkl Blaze or Blizzard Rustler be similar. I'm not a mantra fan? Cheers John at Treble Cone New Zealand

[@SkiEssentials]

I was a Bridge 187 skier for a few years--loved them! I think the Blaze 94 is more similar than Rustler in terms of energy and grip, although the Rustler is closer when it comes to profile. The nice thing about the Rustler, though, is that you can go a bit longer to the 186 and you're getting more metal for increased support due to your stats. That said, I think I'd take the Blaze in the 184 at 6/2 225 over the Rustler in the 186 if I could choose one.

[@deyanmitrovich3590]

Have you tough about making a mid-90 comparison in 2 Parts like you just did with 100mm skis from playful to more stable and carving oriented? I am asking this cuz' its hard for me to choose between Maverick 95Ti, Rustler 9, QST 98, Stance 96, Unleashed 98. Essentially, I would like to learn how to ski trees and 4-6 inches of powder but also be able to carve on groomers. I am intermediate - advanced 6'4'' 210 pounds, but I would consider myself a beginner when it comes to freeride (trees and a bit of powder).

[@SkiEssentials]

We may have to next year if we decide to bring more skis into the mid-90's mix. That said, the Unleashed and QST are both in the 100 mm comparison, with the QST falling more on the freeride side mainly because the Stance 102 from Salomon is in the All-Mountain division. Further, I'd say the Rustler and the QST 98 are your two best choices of the skis on your list because they both float well, are amazing in trees, and function great on groomers. Amazing for learning and progressing.

[@deyanmitrovich3590]

@@SkiEssentials Thanks!

[@taylorlabarr9973]

You say Rustler 9 are “Some of the best tree skis for soft snow days” … would you put them over the rustler 10 for that? Or fisher ranger 96/102?

[@SkiEssentials]

The 9 is more versatile than the 10 overall, especially here in Vermont. Sure, on deeper days, I'd take the wider ski, but for an everyday option the 9 makes more sense. I'd personally put them over the Rangers in terms of smoothness, control, and overall satisfaction.

[@Nisschgl]

Hi guys, love the videos. Would like to ask your advice on a pure in-piste ski. Not going to be used at all off-piste. I am looking for something that would be very stable at high speeds, no twitching, no floating and no vibrations. Cutting through all types of snow, even if going straight down above 90khp. In-piste, I am not really interested in carving, more super-G turns at high speeds. I am 6'2 and 200 pounds and I usually do not have problems getting the edges into the snow, so I also do not mind having wider in-piste skis. Stability is the main goal. But also the skis need to be very good at getting grip on an icy surface. All the best.

[@SkiEssentials]

Are you looking for pure and narrow? Atomic G9 or Blizzard WRC is the place to be for stability at speed and race-like feel. For a wider carver, like in the mid-80's range, the Stockli Montero AR or Blizzard Anomaly 84 are wonderful and somewhat versatile.

[@Nisschgl]

@@SkiEssentials I guess I need a bit wider ski. I ski a lot the whole season, also in springtime so it is icy in the morning and slushy in the afternoon. Thus the ski must handle both ice and slush really well. So a ski for all in-piste snow types. I do not have a lot of experience with narrow skis but I imagine they would easily get stuck in slush. I would also imagine wider skis would be better when going straight down in high speeds. Right? Maybe then the 84mm would be preferred for me, either the Stöckli or Blizzard.

[@Nisschgl]

@@SkiEssentials Hi again. Just wanted to give feedback to you and extend a great thanks. After your advice and watching your videos about the Anomaly, I realised maybe the Bonafide 97 was actually for me so I checked all your videos about them. I found a pair still on the market and I had my season premier last weekend on them. Hands down the best on-piste ski I ever tried. They do exactly what I want. Unlimited power. I am sorry I cannot buy from you since I live in Europe, but I still watch your videos with great enthusiasm. I also bought new powder skis on your recommendation, the Revolt 121, have not received them yet but I am excited to try them out the first powder day I get.

[@Coven_NjMaNy]

Is Rossignol sender 94 Ti still on the 2025 list?

[@SkiEssentials]

Kinda sorta but not really. We didn't hear a peep about the Sender 94 this year and just kind of figured that the Soul 92 was replacing it. Then we see it in the catalog for 2025, but it didn't even appear on our order form. It's a graphic update but the same ski, so if you're looking for a set, it's a carryover build from 2024.

[@billruth7940]

Is there an on snow Enforcer 94 review coming?

[@SkiEssentials]

That'll be a great early season on-snow ski to review for sure. Maybe mid-December?

[@stonecoldsteez]

Yall should do an Omen Team and Poacher comparison. Omen has to be very good to usurp the throne.

[@SkiEssentials]

So far so good when it comes to Omen Team--they feel substantial just like Poacher, but bring some modern shaping and tech to the mix.

[@stonecoldsteez]

@@SkiEssentials Word! I was thinking of it more like the Poacher deserves a retirement ceremony video. Then welcome the new giy

[@paulherrington394]

When do you guys sleep ! Comprehensive summary thanks. So of these skis which are the 2 closest in style and performance to the rustler 9 that you would put in a head to head ?

[@SkiEssentials]

In the mid-90's, I'd say the Ranger 96 or the Optic 96 are closest. You could also look to skis like the Nordica Unleashed 98 or the Salomon QST 98 on the slightly wider side for comparison.

[@paulherrington394]

@@SkiEssentials thanks much appreciated. The optic fell under my radar on first view but having looked again i like the look of it. Is the 2025 version any different to when introduced in 2023?

[@SkiEssentials]

@@paulherrington394 The 96, 104, and 114 are the same build, the 88 is new this year (with same metal as 96), replacing the 92.

[@jeffbooth6962]

Mpro 94 vs mindbender 89ti?

[@SkiEssentials]

M-Pro has more of a pure all-mountain feel--it can do any turn at any time in any conditions or terrain. The K2 feels more locked into a carved turn on groomers--in that area it's amazing, but if you're looking for more of a versatile ski, I'd go with the Dynastar easily.

[@johnnyblazo]

@Bob, we sound like similar builds and styles. What's exciting you most on this wall for 2025?

[@SkiEssentials]

For new skis for 2025, I think the Armada Declivity X 102, Line Optic 88, and Volkl Blaze 94 and 104 get me the most excited.

[@christieman4001]

It’s a shame you guys couldn’t or didn’t include the QST 92 or 98 in this category. I bet if you actually measured the waist of all the skis you’d find some discrepancies.

[@mattgill69]

Yea what?! QST very noticeably absent. Debatably best skis in the lineup

[@SkiEssentials]

We will have the 92 in the men's ~90 mm comparison which ranges from 88 to 92 mm underfoot. Similar with the 98, as that ski will find its way into the ~100 range going from 98 to 102. We understand that different length skis have different measurements, and that a 92 is not always a 92, but for us to take that time to measure the waist of all skis in all lengths, we would simply run out of time. Additionally, we try to adhere to the manufacturers numbers and stated widths as to not further confuse the public as much as possible. There are certainly many layers here.

[@mattgill69]

@@SkiEssentialsthanks for the response! I bought my first pair of QSTs back in 2018/19 under your review & direction. I just passed this video on today to a friend of mine in the market for his next pair. I’m a huge fan

[@christieman4001]

@@SkiEssentialsthanks for the feedback, arguably the most popular ski category and leaving 2 of the most popular skis out of it seems a bit weird. I think Salomon has positioned their 92 and 98 perfectly to cater to the mid 90s all mountain skiers with the 92 favoring the carve oriented playful offering and the 98 favoring the western US side stash oriented skier.

[@ok2x]

Jeff are you saying that you prefer the elan ripstick 96 over the rustler 9 ? But at the end there you said “ one of my favorite skis on the market period” so i got confused. 😂😂😂 yes i stuck it out thru 2 1/2 hours.

[@SkiEssentials]

Nice! I think it's okay to have multiple favorites, especially since there are so many terrific skis. The Rustler is likely more appealing due to the more twin tipped shape and freestyle potential.

[@jackieonassis7438]

Jeff & Bob are the best. I love the energy that I get out of the Serpos, how does the new M-pro compare to the energy and pop I get out of the Serpo?

[@SkiEssentials]

Not as precise or as engaging as the older M-Pro 90, so there's a bigger difference now. The new M-Pro is considerably rounder and more accessible than before. This will be better for more skiers, while the Serpo still feels stiffer and more responsive in the tail than the new M-Pro.

[@jackieonassis7438]

@@SkiEssentials That makes sense. Can't wait for the 90mm wall!!! That new Declivity 92 Ti is calling!!

[@weispicture]

may i ask where is the mogul course and who built and maintains it?

[@bearclaw5115]

They were somewhere else that day. I'm forgetting right now. Maybe Pico?

[@SkiEssentials]

Waterville Valley, NH. They have an upper T-Bar that has a slopestyle course, a little bump line with jumps, and some bigger park hits--all open to the public and a great way to get kids and other people excited about skiing and hopefully showcase their competitive programs. We certainly enjoyed this section of the mountain!

[@weispicture]

@@SkiEssentials that's awesome!

[@xAliPoPx]

For a level 3 instructor out of Whistler, what would you recommend as a light-ish all mountain ski that has energy in turns but is still confident inspiring in variable snow/ice etc? I’m 6’4 185lbs for reference. I already have a 68mm carver and ben chet 120s for the deep days/touring, so really looking for that workhorse in the middle - potentially kore 93/declivity 92/rustler 9?

[@scollyutube]

Declivity, pick your width...... 😉

[@Sep45]

Anomaly 88?

[@scollyutube]

​@Sep45 agree, except they are noticeably heavier to ski, so I wouldn't classify as light. You can feel the weight difference swapping from a 180cm Declivity 92 to the Anomoly 88 in 176cm. My Enforcer 88 is the same too.

[@xAliPoPx]

@@scollyutube have you had any experience with the ti vs the ca version?

[@scollyutube]

@xAliPoPx in the Declivity 88? Only a short ski from top of Symphony to the bottom. I took Enf 88s that year to Canada and also skied a whole day on the Declivity 92ti which I thought was very versitile and less fatiguing than the Enforcer and gave me more initial turn in too. The 88 carbons were fun and even lighter but not the same feel and control carving faster on groomers. I bought the Dec 92ti after that trip and also the 82ti which I took to Europe and loved it. Tried the Anomoly and new Enf this season here in NZ.....

[@foaly8]

how do you not have the Declivity in here :D always just the ARV from Armada

[@SkiEssentials]

The Declivities 88 C and 92 Ti will be in the ~90 mm comparison ranging from 88 to 92 mm.

[@jeffbooth6962]

M-pro 94 or ripstick 96 black as a resort ski?

[@jeffbooth6962]

Michigan ski

[@SkiEssentials]

I love the new M-Pro from a grip and energy standpoint. The Ripstick 96 Black is easy to ski and very mobile, but if you're in the resort and the conditions tend to be firmer rather than softer, I think the new M-Pro is a better fit.

[@reginarosander7655]

No Armada Declivity in any of the rewievs? Would really love to have your side-by-side review there. Also want to see you guys ride them❤!

[@bearclaw5115]

No room for 28 skis I guess. Or they didn't have one in stock.

[@xAliPoPx]

Declivity 92 will be in a 90mm comparison video

[@SkiEssentials]

Declivity 88 C and 92 will be in the ~90 mm video which ranges 88-92. The new X 102 will be in the ~100 mm comparison ranging from 98 to 102. The new X 108 will be in the ~110 mm range.

[@reginarosander7655]

@@SkiEssentials 🥰

[@mattclark1278]

So Rossignol doesn't make an all-mountain 90 or 100 category ski?

[@src248]

They've got a 92, 94, 102, and 106

[@SkiEssentials]

The new Sender Soul 92 will be in the 88-92 comparison. The Sender 94 and 106 are no longer available in North America, so that's out for us, the Blackops 98 will be in the 98-102 range, as will the new Sender Soul 102.

[@src248]

@@SkiEssentials Both of the 2025 Senders are currently available in Canada, we're still part of North America last I checked

[@SkiEssentials]

@@src248 I suppose I should have said that it "seems" like they are no longer available. We didn't see them at all last winter as a 2025 product.

[@88500990]

Yeah!

[@SkiEssentials]

Yeah!!!

[@-m0nke-728]

Where will the qst 98 fit?

[@SkiEssentials]

We look forward to discussing the QST 98 at the directional end of our ~100 mm freeride comparison with skis ranging from 98 to 102 mm underfoot! Coming soon!

[@timothyharrison-l9h]

you guys maybe overdo the enforcer? the 89 is my bump ski...

[@SkiEssentials]

Overdo as in make it seem too powerful? Other than the Mantra and Anomaly on this wall, skis don't get much more hefty or powerful in the recreational world.

[@timothyharrison-l9h]

@@SkiEssentials Specifically when Bob said it made tight bumps a bit of a chore... i'm not what youd call a good skier lol but i call myself good, i found this ski great in hard tight bumps and especially good for just going straight skipping off the tops.