Sky Mother Aviana is surprisingly awesome!

Check out the NEW All-Day Pants from INTOTHEAM! Get 10% off site-wide when you click the link below:
intotheam.com/CHUMBO-pants
MartianBuu plays Aviana Dragon Druid!
Code: tinyurl.com/9v9wsxyt
AAEBAZICCvX8AsX9AomLBKWtBISwBJfvBJ/zBcGVBsekBqqxBg9f5AiKDp7SAr/yAo/2AoyuA6+ABM+sBPa9BK7ABNv6BbuVBtqcBomhBgABA/WzBsekBvezBsekBujeBsekBgAA
Streaming Hearthstone on twitch weekday mornings (~9am-1pm Pacific)
/ martianbuu
Posting lists and random Hearthstone related thoughts on the social media app formerly known as twitter
/ martianbuu
Join the discord to chat about Hearthstone and have your deck reviewed!
/ discord
Full VOD Channel: t.co/vPrt4KTgo6
Outro is "Kazoom" by Quincas Moreira
• Kazoom

[@andrewspencer7804]

I think Fye is invisible because the 'echo' card effect was never programmed to show on signature cards!

[@MartianBuu]

Oh yeah I could see that

[@chorko696]

​@@MartianBuu You can report this in their forums, they will fix it in the next patch

[@theperson912]

never knew how much I’d enjoy watching mr buu on a playground

[@thecakecraft7724]

I think the fast forward at the end being you creating the deck you played in the video is actually genius and the perfect footage to show there, caps off the content in a satisfying way

[@Begeru]

Commander Uthok being the counter to infinite mana is amazing.

[@hambourje]

14:00 this guy is right, there's just no way i don't watch you videos to the absolute end because the last bit is so entertaining and so are the games so thank you for doing it! Love the videos and i can never wait for the next one !

[@MartianBuu]

😊

[@superpixelknight4706]

Honestly, Martianbuubuu has become a big highlight throughout my days

[@TheRavingLobster]

That last game was an absolute banger. Actually every game in this video was a banger. Super awesome my dude!

[@HeeHooHell]

Great content as always Marshie, I don't have the time to catch that many streams right now but your content makes my day

[@mertylgor]

Definitely one of the decks of all time

[@adrienroyer233]

Missleathal at [37:45] with branching path +1attack, +1attack to board and then windfury with zephrys

[@MartianBuu]

Look again.

[@mafain]

Zephyr was offline

[@elliotboiii]

This is exactly the deck ive been wanting to play but been too lazy to build, thank you mr buu

[@gavsterdb]

Beautiful modelling, top marks

[@ph1lny3]

Sbergs is a treasure, have pretty much the same thing in Reno Rogue

[@medicalkir]

Would love to see sbergs' deck code, that's a fun deck as well

[@Gematria009]

Another riveting game of Chumbostone

[@omega4223]

Ulthok broken confirmed by that first game lmao

[@johngleeman8347]

The see-saw stress test!

[@rippedshoe9998]

What is that first game priest's deck list?? Looks hella fun and I didn't understand your answer when someone asked what they were playing

[@sathrielsatanson666]

Renault (reads reno) priest

[@lwyz8a]

Awesome streamer and youtuber, you deserve more subscribers!

[@draconic787]

The loss was big funny too

[@Pink_Maggit]

It's weird, I faced this exact deck yesterday on ladder lol. And I used your XL Shudder Shaman. I lost, opponent had the giga nuts.

[@NN-cr6gx]

I think the raza priest didn't realise that he needs to have the life in order to pay for reno (so he opted into the tie instead) 😆 🤔

[@conalthomas-mcginnis6148]

marshie outro ramblings do indeed go hard, gotta agree with Chatter

[@THernane]

CHUMBO ad spot, very entertaining. Now let's watch the games.

[@nathones]

Does anyone have replacements for both Floops?

[@schneeluchsalpha2966]

I feel like you should always coin out wild growth because you get the full worth of the coin for each following turn until you are at 10 mana. Or maybe now that I write it you should keep it if you have a possible 11-mana combo in your deck.

[@schneeluchsalpha2966]

Yeah, I guess a funny cut of a loss against aggro may also be a little mood riser inbetween two games. Also that last game was really worth a watch both players had their crazy turns.

[@schneeluchsalpha2966]

Annoy-O-Horn has a few new lowrolls since Kaz moved out of standard (some dudes without divine shield, because usually their battlecry targets a minion which then cannot attack while the not-so-annoying-one is still on board, well and said battlecry does not trigger of course)

[@MartianBuu]

I dont love that but I think its balanced out by the 9 cost highroll

[@blackholesun4942]

12:11 Tie 😂

[@themightysandwicho2121]

I love Druid stuff renathal Druid, my favourite kinda Druid!

[@the_jeff3005]

Wild MartianBuu in the wild!!!! Literally!!!

[@SeanH80]

Now we have to ask Marshie to show off his pants on stream ❤

[@jeroenooijen]

I'm going to give you my like, mr. Buu, and there's nothing you can do about it! Also thanks... for one of the video's of all time!

[@Bloozur]

good ad read

[@otzaixia]

this is what matarain would call a deck of all time

[@MonkeePyrotts]

All the funnies!

[@georgeherbert8508]

Someone played annoying board against me with 4 available spaces and rolled 3 annoy-o-troops. I was fuming

[@thearclight4481]

You should’ve doubled down with the random legendaries and brought Prince Malchezaar!

[@orcspanker]

how do i get my hands on this HL rogue deck that sbergs guy was playing

[@usernameabcd1915]

He’s on roguecord. Great community and he’s a good guy to theorycraft with, he always leads the Reno rogue theorycrafts on there. Best HL Rogue player I’ve ever seen.

[@MartianBuu]

I posted it in the post section of my youtube if you havent seen it yet

[@orcspanker]

@@usernameabcd1915 I am a rogue main and I love this. How can I get into that discord server?

[@cosmic3689]

I think hearthstone's animation style actually speeds up very cleanly so I'm surprised there is no option to speed them up ingame. it makes it hard to actually play because I'm too used to the animations playing at double speed from yt. I guess occasionally decks seem to be balanced around some combo taking too much animation time to pull off infinitely / consistently enough, so it might cause issues if they suddenly let you double the speeds ??? but tbh it feels like that cant be healthy and they should bite the bullet and just nerf any combos that come up like that. its never a good sign when e.g. its common for content creators on youtube to speed up card drawing animations,, like, if they think it's worth the effort to manually do that then maybe the devs should speed it up in engine? ps: I slightly wonder if we'd have faster animations overall if more of them showed up in battlegrounds.. I remember poisonous taking forever, (largely because the minion didnt start dying until the poisonous animation finished,) and then as soon as battlegrounds came out and the meta was divine shield poisonous murlocs,,, I feel like it got sped up pretty quickly after that lol.

[@hihigocat]

sometimes the animations taking a while is for the game itself to process the card. you can see it on finley sea guide, where suddenly it speeds up the process the animation. definitely not the case for all of the long animations, but it is a thing to consider

[@MaeJazz]

Fresh cut cheif🫡

[@DillonChichester]

Most useful Commander Ultrith or whatever his name is in human history and it was still only a tie lol

[@lighterraptor7607]

Damn I’ve never been this early to a Marshy vid

[@namelessshadow7748]

Why no dew process?

[@schneeluchsalpha2966]

I'd say this deck has a lot of draw already making dew process at 4 mana a bit too slow (doing nothing but drawing can often be not enough, especially since dew would only help agains more controly decks, which this list is already more built against, versus against aggro, which itself would profit from dew, making it another card that would not help then, or in other words a dead card in the weaker matchup ... this may have been a bit of messed up sentence building, but I'm not gonna change it, sorry)

[@schneeluchsalpha2966]

But as usual in card games, if you want to fatigue your opponent by playing dew process, as well as shuffling new cards into your own deck (for example by Aviana, Kazakusan, or this old card thats in the core set right now, I forgot her name I'd guess Elysiana) you could more or less easily switch a few cards in this deck around to make that happen.

[@MartianBuu]

I wasnt trying to be mill druid

[@namelessshadow7748]

@@MartianBuu Respectable.

[@kuwaitian1579]

martian puts the bod in dads or his bod on dads wait nevermind

[@kaiserkarl1750]

Lmfao! Wtf did a just watch? Cookie monster pants are next!

[@amberlee4536]

I keep getting Hearthstone ads on Hearthstone videos... Greybough VC: YOU'RE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE!! Also the ads are comically bad. I don't think even a single meta card is notably featured in them ever, except when they show a brief shot of a board with an Amalgam of the Deep on it.

[@sathrielsatanson666]

Wut? Of course cutlass Rogue is playable in Wild, especially the aggressive version. It's not super competitive but it's fine.

[@dafredi97]

how much ramp do you want? "yes"

[@CountFab]

That's Reno Druid for you

[@havasicsongorgeza]

I recrafted Elise and Rafaam for my diamond Reno, he is my one and only Diamond card as of now, but he is my favourite card ever.

[@lucaslorencini3453]

You're really a fellow human?

[@weenblizzard9780]

Isnt crow lady with bio project just infinite mana

[@MartianBuu]

Minions have echo

[@weenblizzard9780]

@@MartianBuu my reading comprehension strikes again

[@wisdomball4584]

I dont think we're indulging your outro ramblings i at least enjoy them.

[@saintroy16]

Hello Martian, With the recent nerf to Aviana, I think the community needs to talk about the state of Hearthstone’s red headed step-child, the wild format. The reason I wanted to bring this to the community’s attention was that, few professional players have discussed the change to Aviana, from what I could tell at least. Kripp mentioned it in his reaction video “Designer Insights with Kappa”, and even then only briefly. Besides that, I haven’t found any professional players discussing the change at all! The problem with the silence on this topic is that I feel that Blizzard did something completely unprecedented and only provided very sparse comments when it came to the nerf. Since the introduction of Wild in August 2016, Blizzard’s policy with Wild decks seems to have been to nerf cards pre-emptively, that is to say, right as they are about to rotate into wild. The memorable examples of this being Patches losing charge, and Raza essentially becoming an early version of greymane. There have been a few notable exceptions to this policy, where nerfs were had but for two different reasons. First, there were nerfs along the lines of nerfs to dreadsteed and shadowboxer. These were cards that were largely unplayed, but with the new cards coming into the game, the game would break because of possible endless loops. Second, there was the Naga Sea Witch Nerf. This nerf was really due to a reformulation of the rules of the game that caused a problem with how Naga was discounting cards. As a result, giantslock came into being kinda by accident. Although it was a powerful deck, blizzard believed that Naga’s accidental interaction was too powerful, and so the devs actually stepped into the wild metagame and nerfed it. This was the first time rebalanced the WildHS metagame by directly stepping in and changing a card, rather than trying to introduce new tools to combat the dominant deck in future sets. Whether there was any card that could be introduced in future which was also balanced was a discussion going on at the time, but since this was an accidental deck, again, no comment from Blizzard on that point. When it comes to the Aviana nerf, though, the change we got doesn’t necessarily fit this logic. In Wild, Aviana + Kun were the engine of a lot of druid decks. This engine was what kept druid at tier 1 for a long time. (for those not in the know, Aviana made your minions cost 1, and with the one remaining mana you could play Kun who’s battlecry was to give you 10 mana back. From there you could play any number of other minions for 1 mana). I’m not commenting on whether this engine was a good or bad thing for the game. Instead, I’m saying that this was an intentional piece of old design for the druid class, which was then later directly nerfed by blizzard, This type of change has never happened before in the wild meta, but has happened several times in the standard meta. And if you buy into Kripp’s comments, this change should be very alarming to everyone because Blizzard nuked the class from orbit. Further, the comments given by blizzard for this change really leave us in the dark. In the first “In the Works”, the developers came out and said explicitly: “There’s been an ongoing discussion within the team regarding how Wild should play.” But when this unprecedented change to wild came around, no design philosophy of wild came with it. The team didn’t say anything as to why they chose this card from the range of their perceived problem cards, and the team didn’t give us the range of possible nerfs to Aviana (example: why not leave her at 9 but make the minions cost 2 instead? Why not just the next minion costs 1? Why not redesign completely?). What’s most disappointing about this silence on blizzard’s end is that the team explicitly asked for the community’s thoughts at the end of the “In the Works” update on how wild should play, but again, never said what feedback they got and which responses they found most valuable. Finally, I think this is a topic that should be concerning to everyone whether you play Wild or not. You should be taking notice here because wild is where all your cards are going to end up, and if you would prefer to try and keep up with standard you’ll always be at a dust disadvantage since HS is a closed economy. I think given the player bases reliance on Blizzard when it comes to the economy and the game state, and Blizzard’s promise to have wild be the format that’s supposed to be “truly wild”, Blizzard should inform us on why *this* change and where they intend to take the wild metagame in the future.

[@MartianBuu]

Oh my glob, I think I remember this one? What a pasta.

[@saintroy16]

@@MartianBuu What's a pasta?

[@MartianBuu]

🍝

[@Smallpriest]

Doesn't this deck get absolutely destroyed by combo decks

[@CountFab]

But do combo decks have 1 mana legendaries? Checkmate atheists!

[@sathrielsatanson666]

That is basically any control deck. You either play only to win or playing to have fun. If you play to have fun you accept that you will get rekt by this or that.

[@colleenlove2114]

Interesting ♨now 🤪👑😘

[@luke8973]

What is up with these players named godgun I have faced an abundance of them

[@Av1]

bm into stupid game losing misplay, you love to see it