Sky Wolf Wind Turbine Animation 2014

This animation describes Sky Wolf Wind Turbine Corporation and shows how the turbines interact with wind.

[@jabba5263]

I can see a bird entering this and being completely transformed in jelly.

[@oldbatwit5102]

Showing an animation is about as convincing as showing a cartoon of Fred Flintstone's car.

[@Psy0psAgent]

Yea. Nice. I’ve said for a few years now. Show me the maths. Superman can fly in a computer model.

[@harenterberge2632]

@@Psy0psAgent or even better build a real life prototype and test it in Praxis.

[@RandyZimmerman-pp5wj]

Awesome less impact on the environment well above average kudos

[@ronelcalamba2390]

Sky Wolf Wind Turbine, one of the beautiful win turbine I see, and as it the best function.. great I want to have this kind of turbine in my yard...

[@RudolphHaynes1943]

NICE... we will look into getting one down herein the Caribbean.R V Haynes.

[@greenman1411]

Just seems to be a turbine but is not connected to a generator. How's it supposed to generate power?

[@VamosConLaPeli]

Cool, keep on the good work. (Detail: at 1min42, "40 kilowatts" is power, not work done, I think it should be "40 kilowatts hour per day", or "40 kWh per day".)

[@VamosConLaPeli]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt_hour the paragraph "Confusion of kilowatt hours (energy) and kilowatts (power)"

[@ecosphere6525]

i live in north india i want to use this gen set upto 10 kw .. is it possible to work and also tell me its minimum speed at which it work properly

[@markcoventry6698]

I truly wish that people who claim to know what they are talking about would understand the difference between kilowatts and kilowatt hour is. Doe he mean that this bit of kit will produce constant 40kw or will produce 40kwh per day ie 1.7kw average, big difference.

[@karthikeyacreation8056]

Is these wind turbine get fire with more speed....?

[@keithmailhotte8449]

There is wind energy that is bought and paid for every day at the local airport that is not being used.

[@rommelcarino967]

I refute the logic behind the skywolf. Static pressute will always b high in a duct enclosure than in the open. This holds even if the duct shape is diverging or towards wider opening. This is because the duct wall always offer wall resistance or dkin friction. So better that no duct or enclosure at all

[@Mm-vr8ss]

No the air being diverted around the cone pulls the air out of duct. The Venturi effect of the narrow

[@Mm-vr8ss]

Opening leading to wider outlet leads to low pressure so long as the air stays laminar and attached to diffuser. If there’s no stall the diffuser will significantly decrease pressure. It the environment your used to, there likely isn’t a flow inside and outside the duct. When both flows are attached there’s definitely a vacuum.

[@Raptorman0909]

"40 kW per day" -- what the heck does that mean? Is it supposed to be 40KWHrs/day or a peak output of 40KW or something else. Kilowatts is power, killowatthours is energy -- they are not the same thing!

[@BackToConstitution]

Where is the link?

[@Dude408f]

Do you have something in the vicinity of 1 or 2 MW? How is that better than a commercial typical turbine? Thanks

[@petergoestohollywood382]

It obviously isn’t. This design is nothing revolutionary. But there are always people who want to sell you their shitty idea.

[@mohdmahrouqi7404]

From where can I get it

[@user-rx2zu7qk9p]

Красивая картинка, когда лопасти расположены как у вас, направление вращения нужно поменять)))

[@chrisw1462]

So if this is all true, as of the date of this video its been over 10 years since the first patent. Why are we watching 100% computer animation? Why isn't there a single frame of at least a prototype in the air? Because that much weight and wind drag at the top of a tower is EXPENSIVE to support. Shroud size (due to drag) and weight limitations also limit the size of the blades, killing your efficiency and output (Longer blades == more efficient). Sorry, Sky Wolf.

[@MuhammadSaleem-rj2wg]

Error in defining capacity of turbine 40 KWh ?you must Write capacity in watt per second

[@davidwall7747]

They have a solar panel version that has half the solar panels pointed at the ground - duh!!

[@itslivefromdc]

#derp 😬🤣😂🤣

[@margarita8442]

How Can I invest every thing I have ?

[@dilsatuyguroglu9390]

website ?

[@raulimhof]

Wrong specification for the energy produced in a day.. .

[@123bugness]

Right? That's like saying it will run 40 RPM in a day... makes no sense.

[@greenman1411]

Makes it sound a bit like a scam!

[@br0th3rtub34]

i don't care who you are this is cool

[@petergoestohollywood382]

BR0TH3R TUB3 yes, this is cool if you have little understanding of the technology^^ Why do you think theses things don’t exist on grande scale, but the regular large 3 blade airfoil turbines do? Because engineers who know the physics calculated it through, and economists who know the numbers commissioned it.

[@davidbrandenburg8029]

it looks almost identical to the wind tamer generator

[@TheTrainChasingPoet1999]

Same guy.

[@prafullachandrajani7954]

40 kilowatts per day means 40 kilowatts per 24 hours Therefore, kilowatts per hour is 40/24 = 1.66 Kwh. Kindly clarify the per hour power capacity.

[@harenterberge2632]

Watt is a unit of power. Power is in this case electric energy generated per unit of time. The unit for energy is Joule; one Watt ist one Joule per second. 40 Watt per day would mean 40 Joule per second per day. This makes no sense and suggests the maker of the video doesn't understand basic science.

[@Kazya1988]

Lol... I wuild not be even supriced if they claim to even bring some birds back to life because there are no records as far we know

[@MuhammadSaleem-rj2wg]

Actually it is generating 0.46 watt per second as per your statement about sky wolf turbine please note 🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻

[@sneakyguy4444]

Wouldnt it be better to increase the pressure and harness the energy behind it with a multi stage system? Lots of energy going to waste. At the end you just need the vent to be grounded and all static charges will be negated

[@user-xj7sx5mx4d]

Ελληνική μετάφραση

[@dimi]

The turbin is rotating in the wrong direction lol hahaha

[@hyqhyp]

Science shmience! We need all the inventions we can get to maximize economic returns from global warming concerned consumers. It wont last forever you know.

[@davidsherburne8429]

dimi I thought the same thing.

[@elingecepeda2107]

Exact! Hahaha

[@joebender3662]

40kw per day. You lost me already

[@TheAnantaSesa]

+joe Bender; yeah how many kwh per day! Not very scientific sounding to use wrong units.

[@RobWillmot]

Why is there an eagle flying around an animated video?

[@davidjames1684]

It wanted a birds eye view of this contraption. Note: the Eagle has NOT landed (meaning this contraption doesn't look like it can "hold water"). It is like they say, you can patent just about anything, it doesn't have to actually work well.

[@dougpenhall]

@ 1:44 -- 40 kilowatts per day makes absolutely NO sense!!!! 40 kilowatts at any given point in time, sure. But per day would have to be kilowatt hours. So, maybe you meant to say, "40 kilowatt hours per day" instead of "4 kilowatts per day". If you want be credible with people who actually understand this stuff, and you don't want to confuse those who don't, please correct this.

[@petergoestohollywood382]

Doug Penhall duuuude. 40 kW per day is obviously 960 kWh ;)

[@dougpenhall]

@@petergoestohollywood382, LOL Right!!! 40*24 = 960

[@77gravity]

All that extra mass and effort, for "more efficiency" - not very efficient. Easier to use the same mass and build a bigger, simpler unit. Also, imagine one of these, scaled up to the size of current equal-power units, on a proper mast, in any decent storm - HUGE side-load.

[@grahamflowers]

Betz limit has been smashed and debunked regards Graham Flowers

[@TNW1337]

Yeah no Eagle/bird would be fly around a Wind Turbine as it would be dead after be sucked in!

[@Pawel5837]

How much is it? 40 kW per day? 40\24 = 1.67 kWh? Or what is that?

[@mariecentsous5478]

Your calculation doesn't work either. If you divide watts (which are joules / second) by yet another time unit (hour), you get joules/time^2. If you want kwh from kw, you have to multiply power by time, not divide.

[@ETA555]

Sky Wolf / Bird hunter

[@paulmoffat9306]

How about showing a REAL one in operation, and not an animation.

[@OldF1000]

And what show you that it wont work

[@bouyant8659]

INDEED

[@abialo2010]

They cant because this video is complete shit.

[@utubeaccess7]

And there likely has never been a prototype made. If they built it from their animation plans btw, the turbine blades would go backwards, LOL... Look at the angle of the blades... Duh.

[@GerhardAEUhlhorn]

What is 40 kW per day?!? kW is an electrical performance.

[@TheAnantaSesa]

Each day of nonstop wind, the performance increases by 40kw. In 3 days it should be producing 120kwh per hour.

[@TheAnantaSesa]

Im jk btw

[@GerhardAEUhlhorn]

_„In 3 days it should be producing 120kwh per hour.“_ This is nonsense! If the turbine has a power of 40 kW (nonstop), then it will produce 120 kWh in 3 hours! 120 kWh / 3 h = 120 / 3 kWh/h = 40 kWh/h And then You can shorten out the hour: 40 kWh/h = 40 kW.

[@GerhardAEUhlhorn]

_„Im jk btw“_ What is jk?!?

[@TheAnantaSesa]

+Gerhard A. E. Uhlhorn; by the way. Just kidding.

[@solarhome_ru]

You are lying when claim that your turbine is the first with diffusor creating negative pressure behind the blades. When I worked in Moscow research institute in early 90th we investigated diffusor for wind and hydro turbines.

[@oldbatwit5102]

I came to this video straight from watching another company's 'first' diffusor turbine.

[@davidgillman5368]

The answer to wind turbines is that they are now unnecessary. We now have the ultimate and cheapest green power device with none of these problems, in the SAFIRE GENERATOR. This is what we need to negate all the problems of all competing green energies. It produces almost costless electricity and therefore hydrogen from new FUSION NUCLEAR and is now immediately upon us. We have recently taken a new step to advance the physic of medium temperature plasma fusion power production by enabling chemistry of the atomic nucleus, or "nuchemy" in the newest FUSION NUCLEAR POWER technology. We are passing the chemistry level where we interacted with the atomic electron shells and are moving on to manipulations in this "NUCHEMY" atomic nuclear era when we interact and multiply nuclear protons. We have rediscovered the lost work of the alchemists and can make new elements with different atomic weights. This was ably demonstrated in "THE SAFIRE PROJECT". Quanta are important. We now have enough energy to manipulate the atomic nucleus much more easily by creating a compartment, or what is a local region of plasma containment so reactions at this atomic nuclear level can easily take place. This is about to practically enabled a really fantastic and cheap new era of energy production for the whole of mankind. This with hydrogen, so free fuel obtained from water or atmospheric moisture anywhere in the world. This new fusion nuclear SAFIRE GENERATOR is at the industrial commercial production final development point as of now and it can retrofit older and decommissioned power plants. The energy argument and other power methodologies are all now virtually irrelevant as we have new and very physically and economically powered practical and local community level fusion nuclear power. Solar roof plus Teslawall battery may be the present way to go domestically but megapack batteries and multiple storage technologies interconnected with an expanded ugly grid have a less certain requirement when you consider new any-scale community based and 24 hr reliable and self-fueling fusion nuclear in the form of the "SAFIRE REACTOR". Learn all about it at "AUREON ENERGY.COM". Then learn the newer EU Theory and plasma physics at "THUNDERBOLTS PROJECT.COM" and you will be permanently reeducated with this advanced newer EU theory that will allow you to understand more about the astrophysics of our whole universe and all within and you will be more informed and can teach your peers.

[@christophvonwaldhuf]

pls go outside into real world btw there is nothing wrong with diversified energy production and trying to innovate Fusion is very expensive and won’t be happening for some time plants to long to build

[@hermancain3399]

makes exactly the same claims as the SkyTamer scam

[@harenterberge2632]

Vapourware much?

[@betelgeusesupernova1738]

Boff!

[@TechnoGlobalist]

Now build it in 160m diameter and make it cost effective. NOT VIABLE

[@YTBySIB]

show real product, not a animation.

[@victoraustria5763]

Useless, you put it in a mountain top and it can only produce 40kw???

[@TheAnantaSesa]

They prob meant 3.5 kw max. and 40kwh/d average output.

[@miorieser3210]

Falsche Richtung?

[@petergoestohollywood382]

Ja, und hinzu kommt, dass niemand solche Rotoren für Windturbine verwenden würde. Auftriebsläufer sind schon seit Ewigkeiten der Industriestandard.

[@trenthealy4963]

Its a Windtamer rip off & waste of Patent

[@yancemayor2469]

Ouuyustin Y Yu Yustina kao Yustina kaise atlit lempar lembi ng juara satu pada pon ke sebelas di Korea telah tiada

[@mechadense]

OUCH! It's kilowatt HOURS per day. Both narrator and scriptwriter obviously lack knowlege about basic physics. With that bad of a first impression noone serious would even bother to check out this contraption.

[@kamalali3904]

ششششش

[@glendaw2268]

BS

[@fje1948]

Hi. Scam!

[@andrzejpl9897]

Turbine is not producing electricity ! Is producing electrical energy ! Energy is measured in kWh ! Not in kW . In kW is measured power ! How about some technical education mister speaker or and mister producer of the video ?