Parvati and Padma? Nice Harry Potter reference. ^_^
@Snowmunkee5 жыл бұрын
Caught that too!
@francoislacombe90715 жыл бұрын
During all that talk about statics and dynamics, I kept an eye on those weird shelves behind her.
@TheResidentPsycho5 жыл бұрын
One of the most interesting episode in this series
@RangerRuby5 жыл бұрын
Very true!
@LifeAsJester5 жыл бұрын
Now everyone who watched this knows almost as much as me and I've done 3 years of this in school lol
@cpi235 жыл бұрын
dude we are watching this stoned and aren't doing the applied math!
@RangerRuby5 жыл бұрын
That's what Crash Course is for!
@engibear63925 жыл бұрын
*A B.S. in Civil Engineering only teaches you just enough to be dangerous. An actual Structural degree is presumably better, but in the end school is only the beginning of your engineering education.*
@AlicesWondereland5 жыл бұрын
I'm about to sign up to engineering school and challenge the final on my first day!
@Bob-jn8jt5 жыл бұрын
Love this!!! I finally understand static and dynamic. I was really struggling in class. Now for some reason it all makes sense. (Not being sarcastic). Really thank you for this episode!
@dishakhurana67395 жыл бұрын
Parvati and padma😊😊I am happy to hear these Indian names!!!😊❤
@RangerRuby5 жыл бұрын
That story at the beginning must have been so scary! Engineering is very important in our everyday lives and that show in that story!
@treelight17075 жыл бұрын
Love the series. The animations and the pace of everything. That engineer was kind of careless to people living in the building. He knew it was dangerous, but still didn't say anything?? He was damn lucky nothing happened during the time.
@ilikemusic27265 жыл бұрын
My university combines statics and dynamics into one class. It is notoriously the hardest class at my university. I have my first test in 2 days and am using this as a “I’m kind of studying” distraction. The first test has about an 80% fail rate. Wish me luck.
@shaunaisaJellyBean5 жыл бұрын
We need an episode on bridge types and how they work plz
@AlipashaSadri5 жыл бұрын
A Civil engineering and a physics student walk 'onto' a bar and soon they talk about "moments" and "torques"... the great confusion ensues!
@Someone-cr8cj5 жыл бұрын
This is a really enjoyable CC series!
@RangerRuby5 жыл бұрын
I feel you! This is so interesting and fun!
@oreubens5 жыл бұрын
5:38 The idea shown here isn't a suspension bridge, but a cable-stayed bridge. Should be obvious since nothing is actually "suspended" in that particular concept.
@ridwansetiadi83935 жыл бұрын
I suddenly remembered the difference between suspension bridge and cable-stayed one hahaha. Thanks...
@engibear63925 жыл бұрын
*I concur.*
@johndavid360 Жыл бұрын
Had to watch this for homework lol
@johnmacdonald10945 жыл бұрын
I worked in that building at about that time. Luckily it wasn't the one in sixteen.
@SunriseFireberry5 жыл бұрын
May the Force be with you.
@paramjeetkaur14335 жыл бұрын
CAN U GUYS DO A CRASH COURSE ON SIKHISM-JOHN GREEN
@Hambxne4 жыл бұрын
Funny you mentioned the citicorp building, I just listened to the 99% invisible podcast on it last week!
@engibear63925 жыл бұрын
*An episode on statics with no truss diagrams? :(* *Also, the second bridge is a cable-stayed bridge, not a suspension bridge.*
@AlipashaSadri5 жыл бұрын
Only a civil engineer would notice (and cringe) at the cable-stayed being called a suspension and immediately afterwards a comment about loads being carried by the cables (and no mention of the deck that will be in even more critical compression)
@zhubajie69405 жыл бұрын
I thought you should have presented D'ALembert inertial forces and torques for FBD's as saying a dynamics problem can be instantaneously modeled as a static one for each geometry in an instant in time as an alternative way to look at FBDs.
@psikeyhackr6914 Жыл бұрын
So where is the data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the structure?
@dan1204hc5 жыл бұрын
You can work and research Skycrapers, Statics and Dynamics following the career of Civil or Mechanical Engineering.
@user-zo3wy4we3t5 жыл бұрын
She was on scishow and same topic too...
@shaunaisaJellyBean5 жыл бұрын
Or can we have one on building materials! They are really interesting
@abdallababikir44735 жыл бұрын
70% of comments: What an interesting video 20% of comments: Better than my teacher 8% of comments: Your shelves are crooked 2% of comments: Me
@ryze54314 жыл бұрын
me
@FellowgoofyGoofer5 жыл бұрын
3
@oldcowbb5 жыл бұрын
why the very first engineering course ends ip at ep 26 tho
@ChessMasteryOfficial5 жыл бұрын
*When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it--always...*
@Azdur5 жыл бұрын
Lys 2017den önce atsaydınız keşke fizikte işe yarardı...
@jasonh45345 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed my Statics and Dynamics course... And then I became an Avionics tech rather than an engineer.
@andybearny5 жыл бұрын
Okay that's great explain the WTC 9-11 collapse. I'm intrigued.
@GamesFromSpace5 жыл бұрын
They were hit by gigantic planes. That's a lot of dynamic forces.
@engibear89665 жыл бұрын
*Progressive collapse initiated by column buckling due to a combination of reduced stiffness and initial out-of-plumbness from elevated termperatures.*
@kadeschuman82535 жыл бұрын
Hi, I wanted to throw out the idea to go back to some biology and make updated videos with current facts (as science changes all the time) and more pictures and diagrams for a better and easier understanding of biology. Thanks!
@95GuitarMan135 жыл бұрын
That "industrious team of engineers" who "managed to save the Citicorp building" were, as you said, the company that that botched the design in the first place, and their actions were made all the less heroic by the fact that they hushed up the information until the repairs were carried out, even when a hurricane almost hit Manhattan while they were halfway done... I know this series likes to glorify the engineering profession but that was a poorly chosen example.
@unleashingpotential-psycho94335 жыл бұрын
❤️🔥🔥
@realdealholyfield96165 жыл бұрын
a bit of humor wont be bad.. Is that too much to ask ?
@williamsmith72215 жыл бұрын
I have no idea what you just said
@cpi235 жыл бұрын
start at the beginning again
@humanrightsadvocate5 жыл бұрын
Now do a video on 9/11 and explain the collapse of: WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
@yaddahyaddahyaddah27095 жыл бұрын
That's easy: two planes being flown into the first two buildings and then massive pieces of the the collapsing towers hitting multiple adjacent buildings besides WTC7. But you go ahead and keep believing whatever you want LOL
@humanrightsadvocate5 жыл бұрын
Oh! So that's what happened! OK, thanks! @@yaddahyaddahyaddah2709
@robotguy45 жыл бұрын
Also, while fires at the temperatures cited can't melt steel beams, they can make the steel hot enough to bend and deform, changing the static structure (a standing tower) into a dynamic one (supports fail).
@humanrightsadvocate5 жыл бұрын
And instead of a slow and progressive bending of the building we saw a _sudden vertical collapse_ as if the internal support structure was being destroyed by explosives. Only the steel near the fire was hot, the rest of the building was cold and 100% capable of supporting multiple times its weight + the weight of everything inside it (it's called safety factor). You're either dumb or a troll. @@robotguy4
@engibear89665 жыл бұрын
@@humanrightsadvocate *Compressive buckling of structural steel columns is a stability failure mode, not purely a materials strength failure mode. Once stability is lost in one or more columns, partial collapse can be quite sudden. Assuming that the adjacent columns already have reduced stiffness due to elevated temperatures, it isn't hard to imagine how a disproportionate total collapse would be initiated by dynamic loads from falling concrete and steel. While I can't say I've personally done a multi-million-dollar forensic simulation of the event, the WTC collapse certainly passes my sniff test as well as those of any practicing structural engineer I've ever come across. I think that @robotguy4's explanation is fairly decent coming from a layman.*