Small, Full-Frame, 6k Video Camera!? 👀📸

[@erickail8979]

I never trust when a KZbinr says "affordable". Most KZbinrs are so out of touch with reality.

[@zachdavis7234]

He mean affordable in comparison to the other 6k cameras

[@imagistatheimagista1870]

Agreed. Definitely not “affordable”. Plenty of way cheaper options. However, it does look like a great option for a full featured lighter weight and smaller in size “all rounder” A better video title might have been “Powerful Small All-Rounder Camera”.

[@zulfahmi633]

Agreed

[@nope8637]

The title should be switched to cheaper, or more budget friendly. A budget friendly plane may be 200k, but that isnt the same as affordable even though planes are millions normally

[@attraxia]

Considering a lot of cameras are around the 3k-5k price range I think this is decent

[@szczecin_]

1500$ What a world we live in where it's considered affordable

[@hermanzhang6494]

Already very cheap compared to other full frame cameras

[@rephaelreyes8552]

@@hermanzhang6494 just buy yourself a 10 year old full frame DSLR. Cameras aren't like smart phones. The technological advancements of cameras aren't that fast

[@cmog6036]

This is very cheap compare to sony

[@TomCalton]

Everything is relative. Is $1500 at lot of money? Absolutely! But is $1500 a lot of money for a full-frame camera? Absolutely not!

[@UncleReg]

@@TomCalton Yeah, but where's the affordability part?

[@vaskoobscura_]

This camera is $1500 USD it's not affordable when you consider how little you get for your money. You can get a used EOS R5 or R6mkII for around $2000 and get way more value for your money.

[@turo9992000]

1500 is less than 2000. It's more affordable

[@replaygoplay7919]

or a sigma fp for the same price, or a nikon z5 for 700$ , or a sony a7ii for 1000$

[@jaysonva4256]

Canon R7 or Sony FX30 would be wayyyyy better especially if you want to shoot video lot more support and lenses better af just as many codec options more flexibility or if you want full frame there’s the R8 and these are all the brand new options maybe if it was priced more accordingly like say 1k maybe 1,100$ but for 1500-1700$ it just doesn’t make any sense imo

[@Kevin-mx4vm]

Used vs new

[@JJARCHIE]

I can get the s9 used at 1k , its almost a thousans buxks cheaper

[@irychioperez8272]

Sir this cost $1,700 nothing cheap here

[@heymynameangel]

For a 6K camera, 1700 is ridiculously cheap compared to other 6K cameras, if you really want a bang for ur buck though I’d recommend a lumix g7, resells around 400, shoots in 4K, does the job

[@lucadipaolo1997]

@@heymynameangel well, the X-S20 is 1500 and does 6K open gate as well and has a viewfinder, mechanical shutter, with the only "disadvantage" being it's APS-C. If this thing had a viewfinder I think it would be more appealing.

[@heymynameangel]

@@lucadipaolo1997 true that, thats also a very good alternative! forgot all about that camera lol

[@Lowns_300]

Cheap af for a full frame

[@iaintamish]

bruh who are these people why dont you buy me a 1cm choclate for 1k

[@djlapio93litlebro]

I will buy it used, from people that bought on credit but never end up using the camera, so to recoup loss they listed it on eBay.

[@jaysonva4256]

This, best way to buy gear shit is too expensive these days and why pay the depreciation tax

[@nickbarrow2805]

Great idea. I’ve bought all my instruments used, except for one of my saxes. You can get absolute steals if you’re willing to make a 3-hour drive or pay for shipping.

[@thomasmacdonough288]

Used gear is awesome. Like you say, many people buy these things and just let them collect dust. Unless you're buying retired gear from professional photographers, every used lens and body I've purchased has been practically unused.

[@jaysonva4256]

@@thomasmacdonough288 Not to mention manufacturer refurbished gear! I got a refurbished canon rp for 600$ from canon with a warranty when I got it, it was like new

[@miklosnemeth8566]

The guys who buys S9 know perfectly why they buy it. This is the camera I have been waiting for 10 years, so I bought it immediately when it was available in my city. Definitely, I will not sell it any soon, it is fantastic camera with the Sigma compact prime lenses.

[@Zainphotography]

This guy is determined to make his YT channel grow big and it doesn't matter where, when and how the viewer wastes their money.

[@CallMeRabbitzUSVI]

BINGO! You finally got it, now multiple that by 1000 and you have Camera/Video KZbin

[@encloud19]

In Malaysia, it is sold at around RM7,400 - RM7,900 @ around USD1,614. Not really affordable for commoners.

[@mackisbrocklesnar]

it is the "most" affordable camera in its category. just like Cullinan is the most affordable Rolls Royce. it has nothing to do with who can afford to buy.

[@reapanomin899]

I'd probably let it age for 2-3 years and then purchase it when the price can be anywhere between 15-30% less by then (used condi of course).

[@sangwonpark8967]

Yeah I'll remember this and pick it off a pawn shop at 50~70% off 5 years in the future

[@rkgaustin]

If that were only true. A used Oly EM5 III was $200 used last year. They're $700 now.

[@maxii59]

Good idea, only 1095 days to go, I'll start counting 🤣

[@Defula21]

Sony A7c 1st gen you can find for 1000 USD. It is compact full frame camera with same sensor as A7M4, but with some software limitations.

[@jojovogel]

I can recommend the Canon EOS RP. Full frame, 26,2 MP, Mirrorless. I got mine from a store, brand new but without the Kit lens, so just the body for $750

[@franchocou]

@@jojovogel no 10 bit video 🦖🦖

[@null-undefined]

Nikon z5

[@SketchTurnerZero]

@@franchocou 8 bit is okey for that price

[@SketchTurnerZero]

Yes! Or u can buy Canon EOS R. It's even better and price is low

[@kevrosas1]

It doesn’t have a mechanical shutter. That’s the catch.

[@titomiguelmarques5512]

A second hand a7r ii is more affordable still, yet has twice the resolution, 4k, pdaf, ibis... All of that in 2015, currently for half the price on ebay. A steal.

[@colbyfinnigsmier933]

Funny that you say that because I literally just bought an a7rii. Great camera!

[@Ridge_does_tech]

@@colbyfinnigsmier933 same I just bought my a7rii it’s a lovely camera!

[@ilfaraone91]

Wait,the s9 is not stabilized?

[@JJARCHIE]

Apsc battery, 4k30 at 100mbps 8bit, no open gate,no 4k60, 4k is also from a lineskip variant,blurry fhd, pre a7iii/a6400 colors, ibis issues ( like the a7ii ), bad low light performance ( 1-1,5 stop worse )

[@saturnmedia1]

@@JJARCHIE Will you elaborate a bit on that please?

[@andrewyarcew8542]

No hot shoe, no viewfinder, 6.2k for ten minutes, 4k for 20 minutes, poor controls, no audio out, pancake lens only with manual focus and aperture of F8. 1500 for a body only Good luck with that 😂

[@ademdingin]

No mechanical shutter for photo😅😅

[@brugj03]

Yeah, all those youtubers are bought and sold. They`re making commercials. That lens is really worthless.

[@Zack-xz1ph]

if it was 300 or less it would be worth it just to have a travel full frame camera

[@brugj03]

@@Zack-xz1ph For 300 i would buy it right now. I do like the looks.

[@PixelMoverVP]

Sheesh f8 is rough. It’s also 30fps

[@deepblueskyshine]

3x2 - the traditional photographic format (36mm*24mm, 6cm*4cm, 9cm*6cm, though traditionally they were pronounced differently - 24 by 36, 6 by 4, 6 by 9, regardless of the frame orientation derived from/governed by usable film width).

[@jorgeRamirez-yc2eh]

Everytime I see this guy mention an affordable camera, its like he saying "this is a camera you will not afford!"

[@DarthJarJar6]

My cousin made night vision out of these. Surprisingly good

[@darkpheonix69008]

Cropping doesn't make the shot anamorphic. Still looks like a nice small camera

[@ecchstore2939]

A 36x24mm 6K resolution is perfect for 4K resolution at 22x18 mm original cinemascope projection area. With a classic standard 1,33 or 1,66x anamorph lens it can priducttiom a 4096x1640 px sized 2,38:1 perfect output. As we seen with S5II.

[@liamcroy2494]

Yes its expensive for a camera, but it's already been pointed out by many people that it is considered affordable COMPARED to other cameras of its type. And, for the people its i.e. content creators, its great. Film in the average 16:9 aspect ratio, then crop to whatever you need for shortform content, or 9:16. It also debuts a few new streamlined editing features. What im getting at is that its cheap AND competitive for the people shopping for this kind of camera

[@CoreFineArt]

Id been using my GX85 for a long time and wanted to upgrade it to a newer, drop in my pocket shooter, and when I heard about this camera, I got excited. Imagine my heartbreak when I learned there is not viewfinder :((

[@asdcomasdcom]

Can you make a full video for this S9? I’m very interested in.

[@TomCalton]

Already live my friend: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZDRhnurh9SGb5o

[@stefanvasilev9318]

Someone at Panasonic HQ saw the Nikon Zf with the color leather and boxy design and was like "We need that as well" 😅

[@TomCalton]

Ngl, I got Zf vibes when they announced the colourways too

[@stefanvasilev9318]

@@TomCalton Just no EVF, so you're stuck with the toirist-taking photos-with-phone stance 😂

[@Wildridefilms]

Panasonic did multiple colour options for the GM1 and GM5 about a decade ago.

[@ChasedRabbit]

Really interesting point with the aspect ratio, that’s pretty cool. Not something I’d have thought of as a plus, but actually very useful in a time where content has to be posted in different aspect ratios for various platforms/content types.

[@Kids11111]

It doesn’t have auto focus for video, save your money

[@user-uv1ux2sm2s]

It’s cool but no EVF is a dealbreaker for me and I’m assuming most others in the market for a FF camera body.

[@manuelaj3z116]

SERIUS QUESTION, what is the advantage to have a full frame camera?

[@Xottapchenko]

Panasonic forgot the hotshoe :(

[@tonkatsu9907]

the hot shoe is right there?

[@sauzefilms]

@@tonkatsu9907 the S9 has a cold shoe.

[@kylejenkins5050]

@@tonkatsu9907 there’s no electronics that allow anything you may place in the slot to communicate with the camera, thus by definition makes it a “cold shoe”

[@Xottapchenko]

@@tonkatsu9907 no, it’s a cold shoe

[@gwenlop9512]

How does Panasonic go from inventing the first camcorder with image stabilization to forgetting about adding contacts to a 1,000$+ camera’s shoe so you can use Speedlites? At least, they could’ve put an additional connection in the shoe so you could use some accessories they made like a viewfinder or a microphone, like the Sony Multi Interface Shoe

[@techpassion4126]

The KZbin algorithm is the devil because now I'm curious to buy this lol, those samples look stunning! Never seen your videos before or any camera-related vids in general, just gonna have a quick look around the channel!

[@aaronDyates]

The most affordable mirror less full frame would be a canon RP.

[@michelecintramika8482]

Nop! Nikon Z5 > Canon RP

[@CallMeRabbitzUSVI]

​@@michelecintramika8482 Canon RP usually sells for $600 refurbed from Canon

[@markomilojevic8122]

Nikon Z5.

[@miklosnemeth8566]

I bought this camera, the Panasonic S9, as the first customer in my city, immediately when it was available. In my decision almost none of the features mentioned here played any major role. My preferences were totally different, this was the camera I had been waiting for 10 years.

[@420gl7]

Affordable? Since when is £1.799,99 affordable??

[@jjOnceAgain]

For a full frame camera, it's a good price. They're usually around $3-5k

[@ziks4103]

@@jjOnceAgain thats complete bs. They are by far not in the 3-5k. Its 2-3k and under 2k if you get a good deal or cash back. Smth sony and fuji do a lot

[@jjOnceAgain]

@@ziks4103 so it's still cheaper than that. Nikon Z9 is $6k, Nikon Z7 is $2.5k, Cannon R5 is $2.9k.... so the $1.7k is affordable in it's class

[@icedcocoa01]

I'm seeing so many comments justifying the price tag for this camera, and while I think it is a powerful camera I cannot agree with the affordable part. I think the title was originally "An Affordable full-frame camera" for this short, which is now changed to "Affordable 6k video camera" to make it more sense (though I could be wrong, so sorry if my memory is incorrect Tom). But as there's already an actual affordable (and newly made) full-frame camera - Nikon Z5 - I still can't agree with "one of the most affordable full-frame camera" part. currently $821.99 on amazon for body-only, and Nikon made it much more content camera after years-long software updates. It does suck at video part, but 1080p wise it's still decent. For video part, other than I don't get the obsession with 'full-frame' tag, I don't think it's even a good budget video camera when there's severe recording limits (6k 10min, 4k 15min, fhd 20min??), no viewfinder, no hotshoe, no anti-flickering, suffering from rolling shutter. I would go with new APS-C (super 35mm) cameras which are a lot more affordable than the full-frame (and more variety as well), Panasonic S5 which is full-frame currently under $1200 (body) with lot more features. And then there's a wide world of well-used cameras. But what do I know? According to many comments in this section I'm hopelessly broke when I don't find this camera attractive for it's price tag. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[@jjOnceAgain]

@icedcocoa01 that is because you don't know the difference between a full-frame camera and an iphone. For a semi-professional camera, $1.7k is amazing pricing.

[@CrowFlips]

I feel like I’m not trusting a lot of new companies except Sony canon or Nikon. I think that one of them with a good lens is basically all you need instead of a bunch of small artisan cameras. It does look quite nice though.

[@Hiah.l]

What were Panasonic executives thinking when they implemented a cold shoe for this

[@gwenlop9512]

Panasonic executives were WAY too high to think. They didn’t even think about normal camera things or stuff that would be a great compelling reason why to buy an S9 over other cameras.

[@thesinysterstyle]

It's not about megapixels, it's about the physical size of the sensor.

[@WNKYFCE]

Frame of reference for Photography KZbinrs. Anything over $600 is not considered "affordable" by anyone making under $200,000 a year, which is 99% of people.

[@Funkteon]

I don't know how these camera companies stay in business now that 99% of the population are using their phones to take all of their photos these days. I'm pretty fkn certain that their entire customer base is cashed-up, trust fund, neppo baby vloggers with daddy's money to burn, given the state of the global economy over the last half a decade... Even pre-Boomer 'Silent Generation' folks born before the end of WW2 have figured out how to use their basic smartphones to take photos after some instruction from their Millennial grandkids... Who in the living fuck is spending the better part of $2,000 USD on a pocketable snapper these days?!?

[@daitedve1984]

Full frame is not an end in itself! You can use 1/2" too. But main Q is LENS - you need a rich choice of best lens. Does Panas has any?

[@deang5622]

The thing was that years ago, the lenses for Lumix were actually made by Leica. Leica. Let that sink in.

[@vaskoobscura_]

This camera is trash. You have 10 min record limit that's pretty much useless. You're better off making videos with your phone and saving up your money for a real camera. For Photography we'll see how the AF works when the non-sponsored reviewers get to test it.

[@jaysonva4256]

Has no mechanical shutter so I doubt photography will be better

[@kylejenkins5050]

@@jaysonva4256 I tried it the other day and it’s not good for anything you’d get paid for. It’s good for street stuff with a 24 or 35 mil but other than that, the AF doesn’t track well, I get banding under LED lightings, and the readout is slow so when taking pictures of folks playing soccer or volleyball, the ball or arms will warp. The cam isn’t good enough for its specs. Also, why is there no grip??? It’s like a phone with a lens mount

[@Adreno23421]

Compare it to Canon R8, the R8 is 1099 new on B&H (compare to 1397 of the S9). It has an EVF, only digital stabilization, can do 4k60 instead of 4k30 of the Panasonic. The R8 can do 2 hour recording, the S9 only 15 minutes. Over 4 thousand autofocus points vs under 1000. Panasonic does not even have a flash shoe... This channel is anti-Canon for some weird reason.

[@MyLifeFrAiurGaming]

addressed by firmware update thank god, unlimited recording now

[@Voltarion_WWa]

It's more expensive than many full frame canon mirrorless cameras

[@Jeremy.Jerelle]

Canon RP is full frame at half the price...

[@bryan3am]

I think the selling point to this camera is mostly the size. An alternative to Leica's Q line or Fuji's X100 line.

[@fotografalexandernikolis]

@@bryan3am With a rolling shutter sensor and no mechanical shutter, it's not going to compete with any of those either. X100 has an F2 lens whereas this camera has no lens that small and bright. Bruh you just looked at the physical dimensions and thought "oh a competitor!" without taking ANY other factors into account? 💀

[@michelecintramika8482]

Nikon Z5 > Canon RP

[@alrayson]

@@bryan3am if you want to compete with fujifilm and leica, missing an EVF is a big discouragement for photographers. With this price I would at least want a EVF. All I can say is that’s a Ricoh with video features and bigger sensor… lol such a stupid decision for Panasonic

[@jaysonva4256]

@@fotografalexandernikolistbf this seems to be exactly what Panasonic did when maki g this thing

[@AyFantasma]

Reminds me of the Sony a7c I feel as if cameras are going for smaller bodies on purpose

[@trulsdirio]

Yeah. Nah. Crippled a bit too much to achieve the size. Also isn't the Z5 cheaper? And soooo much better?

[@Jose-gx5vp]

Great job on the video. You just earned a sub.

[@Drawperfectcircles]

It’s over a thousand dollars, bro, that ain’t affordable

[@neyfarias23]

You might as well just buy a second hand sony a7 III and a lens for the same price 🤣

[@astralgod6448]

@@neyfarias23 the sony a7 III is over 2k euros where i live

[@heymynameangel]

dawg its a quality camera, other 6k cameras sell for 3k+ , it damn near cut the traditional price in half which makes it more affordable .. wat

[@JJARCHIE]

​@@neyfarias23i dont see an a73 with 4k60 nor 10bit with the lumix ibis it has

[@Hoodoovudu2]

I wonder how this compares against the sony A7C. Same price and form factor.

[@theinternetkid]

😂 everything is affordable, depending on whom you ask.

[@guillermo7168]

Full frame and all that in such a small camera? OMFG! 🤯 I used to be really interested in cameras some years ago but left that hobbie around 2019, technology has come so far

[@shApYT]

Isn't it the z5 that's the cheapest new?

[@PakuZero]

I dont really know why any person except a full on movie studio type would need anything better than the amazing phone cameras we have these days

[@Girtthquake]

Affordable? Just looked it up, its $1700

[@jjOnceAgain]

Full frame cameras are usually $3-5k

[@kylejenkins5050]

@@jjOnceAgain this is like the 5th time you ever copy pasted this comment with wrong information. Full frame cameras (brand new) start at 1200 bucks. If we’re talking used in new condition with less than 4 hours of use time, they start at around 800 bucks

[@CallMeRabbitzUSVI]

​@@jjOnceAgainYou can grab a Nikon Z5 right now for $860 new, please stop spamming this comment

[@jjOnceAgain]

@kylejenkins5050 Don't compare used cameras to new ones. Fujifilm's GFX50S is $3k, Sony A7 iv is $2.2k, Nikon's Z 8 is $3.5k, and Cannon's R5 is $3k. A $1,700 camera is extremely affordable in it's category

[@JJARCHIE]

​@@bedenegative the s9 is a great B cam for tight shots and handheld gimbal work

[@thigsproductions]

What's the lens mount?

[@bapt_andthebasses]

LUT ? As in Teal & Orange filter... Like no other colours exist?

[@kris4637]

Lut doesn't mean teal and orange filter.

[@bapt_andthebasses]

@@kris4637 You missed my point: all the LUT he showed on this video looked very teal&orange. All of them... so, honestly people are abusing that kind of filtering.

[@eggydrums]

Considered getting rid of my X100V for this but the lack of mechanical shutter is making me doubt.

[@tolgaygulec]

The v is better

[@michelecintramika8482]

@@tolgaygulec Nop!

[@soprolakido]

affordable is used a7 with 11k shutter for 450 eur

[@jjOnceAgain]

Yeah, where are you finding that price? Because New, the A7 costs nearly the same price

[@soprolakido]

@@jjOnceAgain you cant buy new a7, they are discontinued

[@jjOnceAgain]

@@soprolakido Then it's a false equivalence. $1400 is an affordable price, for a new full frame camera. That's like someone going "this brand new sports car is affordable" and you go "No, because if you buy a used 2008 car its cheaper"

[@soprolakido]

@@jjOnceAgain but you can buy a7iii new for 1500 eur or a7c

[@jjOnceAgain]

@@soprolakido $1.4k is still cheaper

[@valala2987]

You can get full frame cameras for half the price or even less. The market does not just included the newest and greatest.

[@leoslash]

$2000 isn’t affordable.

[@maximedelpech7217]

Of course it is a substantial amount of money, but there are very few cameras with this kind of specs. Not every camera has open gate at 6.2k on a full frame sensor. There are other options, and the one that seems the most comparable is the sigma fp.

[@jjOnceAgain]

Yes it is. Full-frame cameras are usually $3-5k. It's very cheap within the category. It's like saying a $30k sports car. Can you find cheaper cars? Yes, but it's an affordable car in it's category

[@maximedelpech7217]

@@jjOnceAgain totally, I think "value" would be a more adequate word than cheap 🤝

[@jjOnceAgain]

@@maximedelpech7217 he says "affordable". The definition of "affordable" is literally "reasonably price"

[@AKB47ANCE]

I agree not cheap , i don’t know what other brand or models run for that probably support what this does as well . If I had to guess it’s touristy cheaper than the alternatives

[@datcheesecakeboi6745]

It's the cheapest new full frame

[@ABF_x]

3:2/3:3 aspect ratio, my beloved

[@dionsmith2405]

Hi guys, just a general question since i cant seem to get a solid answer elsewhere; i want to go travelling and need a camera to take with me, but im completely new to photography and dont want to pay a huge amount to get some decent pictures. What camera should i get?

[@n8-creates]

No hot-shoe, no deal.

[@alistairbadger4413]

Just because a camera is VERY expensive (which this one is) doesn't make him wrong. A lot of people can spend over 1K over the cost of this one for a full frame camera (admittedly it would have more bells and whistles than his one does). We're talking about professional or luxury-grade camera equipment here, not your average consumer stuff. This is very much a 'more affordable' option for that range of products

[@liamleech4748]

where is the grip

[@fayed.untitled]

What's the video recording limit of this camera again? :D

[@reaxxion]

1,500 affordable? LOL

[@TomCalton]

In the world of full frame, this (unfortunately) is considered affordable 😅

[@reaxxion]

@@TomCalton darn it! I guess I’m stuck w my lumix gx85 for now 😅

[@willywonka3050]

$1500 for a full frame is a steal dude

[@kylejenkins5050]

@@willywonka3050 Canon R8, RP, A6700 with a speed booster all beat this lumix. This LUMIX has cool features to keep up with the pack, but not any real hardware to stand out. I’d buy a used one for an actual deal and use it for everyday carry but not for paid gigs

[@sauzefilms]

@@reaxxion bruh dont listen to them. a brand new Nikon Z5, Canon RP, Sony A7c/A7iii body are much cheaper.

[@GeorgeDaPro3847]

Bro took never judge a book by its cover to a whole new level 💀

[@escapemetracks]

lol this camera is not affordable. Is almost about 2000€

[@phin1871]

Affordable FULL FRAME camera.

[@hexium_]

@@phin1871there are many cheaper full frame cameras buddy

[@jjOnceAgain]

Full frame cameras are usually $3-5k

[@fotografalexandernikolis]

@@phin1871 Still a waste of money. It's bad for video because it's got a 15min recording limit, and it's bad for stills because it doesn't even have a mechanical shutter despite using a slow sensor. You'll get rolling shutter on anything that moves.

[@zookrobe3749]

Eos r8 is way better for the price especially if you can get it refurb straight from canon it's only 999.

[@BoomixDe]

Full frame, 10bit, Open gate is actually impressive compared to more expensive cameras

[@r.s.w.k4569]

Until you find out it has unusable rolling shutter and 10 min record limit. lol it's a marketing gimmick.

[@kaihughes1857]

CAD $2000.00 affordable to whom?

[@lauverry]

affordable for what it can do lol, nothing is “affordable” when talking about cameras

[@zookrobe3749]

Technically it's affordable for full frame but lumix is pimping the "small" aspect alot it's not worth it eos r8 and other competitors are better.

[@HammerGameCheats]

I just want to say that he didn’t say its affordable/cheap which its not but he said its a affordable full Frame camera so for the feature it has its cheap ❤

[@yoshy2628]

That's 1.7K... affordable?

[@VideoGameBoxReviews]

For a full frame camera, yes it's affordable.

[@oddtrack]

i recommend the Rebel T7. 450 USD, and plenty of aftermarket stuff. if you know your settings, you can get some nice shots. the reviews i saw sold me on it. now, instead of more cameras, i can just _focus_ on getting a few more lenses. though those prices can go from $70 to $10k REAL fast. the same can be said for any camera...so , 🤷‍♂️

[@olivertrees]

It’s just 6k, not 6.2

[@TomCalton]

What an idiot- you're absolutely right, my apologies! Not sure where I got the extra .2k from!? Thank you for correcting me!

[@osepvelasquez]

@@TomCalton hahaha rofl

[@kulupal]

Beware. This camera has only an electronic shutter. This has some consequences on shooting in rooms with artificial light. You can get some banding. Too bad that they did not build in a mechanical shutter

[@laurenthenry]

Biased review. 15 minutes max recording in 4K LMAO, are we back 10 years ago Pana ?

[@gwenlop9512]

Panasonic actually still thinks they’re in 2008. You’ll actually need uber-proprietary software in order to even read and export the files, you will have to jump through hoops since the software only works for Windows 8 32-bit and it’s also only available as a Metro app that only works on a Let’s Note CF-XZRF7VS, otherwise it will outright crash the whole in classic, convoluted Panasonic style.

[@manavmanav31]

just FYI i think you meant *biased not buyest

[@laurenthenry]

@@manavmanav31yes thx English is not my first language 👍😁

[@EMTOHyt]

I dont really agree when people say 3:2 is good for reframing. Unless you adjust the shot to account for these crops, most people will use the entire view of the shot for their images. Cropping the footage still cuts out important parts of the video. If you want 16:9 footage, shoot in 16:9, etc...

[@Chow0012]

15 min 4k record limit, 4k60p 1.5x crop and a 26mm f/8 manual focus lens which cannot use nd filters stop the cap - terrible camera

[@yadalin917]

Maybe the context of "affordable" in this case is compared to those professional camera that is same class as this lumix. Cmiiw

[@mewli7402]

affordable? I don't think so

[@VideoGameBoxReviews]

what's wrong with you?

[@mewli7402]

@@VideoGameBoxReviews Hey bro, I mean this new camera w/o mechanic shutter, no hot shoes, no EVF, no small & compact lens to choose from (that MF 26mm F8 is a joke), recording limit (even in FHD), plastic body (no weather sealing) and it charged for 1500$

[@Phantraas]

You can get a Sony full frame, a good bit cheaper. They go on sale often

[@tuvirat238]

I think it’s versatile than Leica Q Series.

[@dspinilih]

what about its auto focus capability for video?

[@Robert_E]

Sexy camera, but "affordable" is just a plain lie

[@TomCalton]

It's affordable in full-frame terms. Everything is relative.

[@Robert_E]

@@TomCalton that's valid, considering the new Sony cameras are 3x more

[@kylejenkins5050]

@@Robert_E you can buy a brand new a7iii right now for the same price and have unlimited 4K record time and take higher resolution photos. Autofocus is better as well as IBIS. This is simply a pocket/fannypack camera

[@Hasman12]

I bought a fz1000 in like 2018 which was great

[@gonzolx]

It’s not affordable at all, you can get best camera for that price

[@Drewqes]

Affordable (full frame)

[@michelecintramika8482]

Leica Q3

[@dfotos]

The S5 II doesn't cost that much more either. I don't understand the hype from many KZbinrs about the S9. 15 or 10 minutes shooting limit, no viewfinder and an F8 pancake without autofocus. I don't understand Panasonic. A Gx9 II would have made much more sense. But the photography world is simply clamouring for the so-called full-frame format, which in reality is a 35 mm format.

[@kylejenkins5050]

Jared Polin was right 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@kylejenkins5050]

@@unbroken1010 What are you talking about?

[@michelecintramika8482]

@@kylejenkins5050 KZbinr too

[@kylejenkins5050]

@@michelecintramika8482 can you tag the channel? All I’m getting is obviously the P Diddy allegations and no KZbinrs

[@BAYgaming-c2c]

I feel like people saying $1500 is unaffordable when Canons newest video camera goes for $6000+. Ill definitely be buying this camera especially with best buys 12 month 0 interest financing

[@MatPLJ]

No grip, no thanks

[@tonyhernandez4185]

The S9 vs the A7C. Both comparable?

[@sweeneyTodd-de4by]

This camera is obviously for people with loads of money, how about doing something for people on a low budget rather than expensive price range

[@CallMeRabbitzUSVI]

He does that all the time, he recently a lot of $300 camera like the NX Mini and the Nikon 1 J5, now I don't think he did the best job with those videos but they were basic and passable to get your info with a few cheeky laughs in there. But yes he does cover tons of cheaper cameras

[@abirahmedtuhin4440]

What do you mean by affordable???

[@siniestrotrasgo971]

Hi, forgetting the 'affordable' thingy... How does it behave under low light, namely concerts with moving musicians? Any other suggestions? Thanks!

[@Professor_Aggressor]

I feel a clobbering coming on. 4:3 is THE traditional aspect ratio. The 24x36mm full-frame format is a holdover from 35mm film standards. Also, if you're not shooting through an anamorphic lens it's not an anamorphic shot, it's a sparkling crop.

[@bobbyneedle]

I could advise a Sony Alpha 7s !!! You can can pick them up for 400€ and its ISO is the best!!! Full Frame too

[@yorgenibnstrangle3072]

I was exited to see affordable. Then I googled it and its $1,799.99 as of mid 2024. You gotta be kidding.

[@victorfaria7439]

I hate living in Brazil cause there’s a lot of products they don’t sell here, so I search for this model and google show me the Sony ZV, yeah Google almost the same

[@22welcome]

Thank you for sharing this nice video, which lens I could use it ? Canon or Nikon ?

[@gwenlop9512]

Leica L-Mount

[@22welcome]

@@gwenlop9512 Thanks 🙏

[@Recycler-tq1cl]

It should have been built as a photography centric camera, a pancake kit lens, with minimal video capability but priced much lower.

[@JoshTrombone]

Isn't 3:2 more traditional than 16:9, since 35mm full frame is historically 3:2?

[@adriancozma6102]

I think we have a different approach to affordable. Also, there are plenty of full frame cameras out there, under half the price of the S9

[@prof_jesus]

For the original USD price, this camera is a steal because it is amazing when it comes to colors and low-light. However, here in India, it's priced equivalent to 2800+ USD for just the body, and while the camera is amazing, it's not so practical to spend that much despite my want for it. I think people need to see its real world performance to understand how beautiful it looks, and I'm not even a Lumix guy, never have I even considered anything outside of my trusty Sony ecosystem, but this particular camera blows me away. It performs better than the Sony a7c II when it comes to videography, and I'm literally buying the a7c II at this very moment (partly because I have been used to the Sony ecosystem and also because the price for the Lumix S9 is so crazy inflated in my country). I personally, and genuinely feel anyone who buys this camera is going to have little to no regrets because the results from it is beyond my expectations. I've seen reviews that blow me away and some sample images from online databases have convinced me that it's more than capable despite its size. I don't think you're hearing what Tom is saying- this is an "affordable full frame camera", not an "affordable camera". It is priced just right for such a capable full frame camera, but y'all crying over here while an APSC sensor Fujifilm x100 VI is always out of stock at the same or more price... and it's getting all kinds of good remarks? Be reasonable.

[@Fourbars26]

I really wish it has a view finder.

[@0Rumpy]

An actual affordable camera is canons EOS series. More specifically the EOS 100 great for beginners from $500-$700