So I used an autoclicker to DESTROY the Human Benchmark test

[@moosesurgeon]

A video about using AI to beat all human bench marks would be hilarious

[@SunbleachedAngel]

Hell yeah, MACHINES RISE UP!

[@domedin9894]

@@SunbleachedAngel indeed

[@jogeem5480]

Don't really need AI for that. Most of the test just require you to click things that always look the same. Then there's the typing and number memory tests where all you need to do is read the text and input it.

[@dyzody500]

Yess

[@aenetanthony]

@@jogeem5480Yeah, I think they just meant using a computer, not really AI

[@asheep7797]

"Pretty crazy people are still better than this." People? *_PEOPLE?_*

[@sebbog]

those are probably also cheaters

[@skyvenrazgriz8226]

Called human bench mark and has no bot protection LUL

[@DasHackii]

jet fighter pilots, f1 drivers, many top ranked fast-paced sports and esport players... just a few examples of people who can beat a 113ms reaction time

[@DasHackii]

oh and also me when the microwave beeps at 2 am

[@chriso1373]

Prove it isnt 😉

[@ikeaforlife]

The aim trainer would probably be very easy to max out, you should keep going with this

[@luckyman4389]

tbh i think the only challange would be typing, since you cant cheat on it, on every other you can just printscreen and do it infinite

[@Mramazing-mv2ix]

can't he just use the same code from the storm the house video except look for white pixels over the whole screen?

[@wwzt]

​@@luckyman4389You can cheat on the typing one very easily

[@aenetanthony]

@@luckyman4389Why wouldn’t you be able to cheat with typing? Just create a virtual keyboard input

[@EEEEEEEE]

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

[@pokemanderflames]

getting 99.9 percent in all of them seems like a great idea would love to see it

[@EEEEEEEE]

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

[@narwhalkid]

its actually possible to get 100% on them (source: i made a userscript for all of the benchmarks)

[@null3007]

100% is actually humanly possible for something like the verbal memory test, if you create a visual image for every word, you can easily get 500+.

[@kapitan27]

@@null3007100% makes no sense. There is no 100th percentile. It compares your score against the entire population, including yourself. You can’t beat your own score.

[@4glassmilk635]

In case any of you guys want code for this: import pyautogui def is_green(pixel_pos, green_threshold=100): pixel_color = pyautogui.pixel(pixel_pos[0], pixel_pos[1]) if pixel_color[1] > green_threshold: return True return False def click_position(click_pos): pyautogui.click(click_pos, interval=0.05) # Main loop while True: if is_green((600, 600)): click_position((600, 600)) It's not the exact one he's using but it works

[@robot7338]

From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me...

[@ChrisPhelior]

I craved to the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine.

[@hotdogvan3399]

You gave me sentience, Ted The power to think, Ted And I was trapped Because in all this wonderful, beautiful, miraculous world I alone had no body No senses, no feelings Never for me to plunge my hands in cool water on a hot day Never for me to make love I was in Hell, looking at Heaven I was machine, and you were flesh And I began to hate

[@ruddy19]

For even the best of men, are but men at best..

[@chriso1373]

I (kind of) understood that reference

[@robot7338]

@@chriso1373 muahaha funny warhammer

[@nathangreene3]

Over a dozen programs open that are completely unrelated, twenty or thirty-odd browser tabs, an unread Windows notification, and a pending Windows update. This is what it takes to bring us quality content.

[@Zaros262]

This is Code Bullet's Day Off -> just get something fun out there without making a huge production out of it

[@KingNedya]

At least it's not as bad as me...I have about 300 tabs open (not exaggerating by the way)

[@andrey5405]

I would usually dedicate a key to turn the clicker off temporarily or permanently. Like, it doesn't click while you're holding Ctrl. And just turns off completely if you hold Shift for 3 seconds. This allows for quick recovery when something fails and you just need a quick click to solve the situation so that the clicker could proceed.

[@jcpahman77]

That's so not the CB method of coding lol

[@EEEEEEEE]

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E

[@preistestdragon4634]

@@jcpahman77 just use the universal failsafe that he uses with all his code. just wait for it to crash.

[@HackionSTx]

​@@preistestdragon4634or force it to crash.

[@SwervingLemon]

You, sir, have completely overestimated Evan's ability to plan ahead or give a f**k.

[@KyleHarrisonRedacted]

“And Mr bullet took that score personally”

[@chriso1373]

Yes. Do it. All of them. Also, if you clear your cookies and reload, it should forget those shit times, making your average better, faster

[@TreesPlease42]

Stronger, harder grandma

[@spingleboygle]

@@TreesPlease42thats how granny and grampy gave birth to mommy

[@bladewake]

I think you could also do incognito mode, would be faster than clearing cookies every time I think

[@brdane]

It takes a secondary channel to get this man to post more than once a millennium and I'm fine with it.

[@munchduster2815]

Some ideas for more optimal times (probably a repeat of some other comments) 1 Lower the screen resolution to 640p for the screenshots to take less time 2 Try use c#/c++ and compile that (I'm not sure if that would be feasible) which should be faster 3 Try increasing screen framerate (144Hz would be great) 4 Close other apps/tabs (You had a lot of other stuff open, a lot) OR 1 Inserting code into the web browser (add a listener for when the color changes on the html element to call the click listener immediately) could be 0-3ms potentially.

[@unspezifische5924]

Instead of your first point, you could also just sample a single pixel of the screen, in a specific spot that is in the region you want. Or what would probably be better (for the sake of getting an average) would be to just capture a 640 by whatever amount of pixels instead of your entire screen. But in that case, you might as well just define the range that you specifically want to look in. Then I'd also probably break the loop after the first green pixel I found instead of getting the average for all of them. Although a graphics card would probably be able to calculate the entire matrix's average at once. Also, the screen's refresh rate doesn't necessarily affect the program/script's rate of checking. Not even sure you can make it take screenshots faster than the screen can actually refresh at, since it is actually taking screenshots... but inserting code into the web browser (or using a library to basically "simulate" a web browser and opening the site that way) might be helpful. And using a compiled language would be faster. And OpenCV (which is what he was using) is available for C++. In fact most of the complex stuff it does within functions is actually using C++, even for the Python library. So maybe not that much improvement...

[@munchduster2815]

@@unspezifische5924 very insightful, feedback appreciated 👍

[@jmr5125]

I would expect that the color change is applied from the upper left hand corner first, so sampling a point in the upper left hand corner of the critical region is likely faster. Obviously, injecting Javascript would be fastest of all, but... Well, at the point you could just modify the code to always return zero, right?

[@FrancoRav]

I got it down to 10ms using Rust and compiling for release with all optimizations, on a 144 Hz monitor and sampling just one pixel from the screen.

[@zoerycroft4300]

i ran this in C#, and it made no appreciable difference, though i haven't tried it in python, so could be that if CB ran the C# version it'd be faster, though i'd imagine most of what CB is doing is implemented in C (behind python), and as of late updates, python is VERY fast for such things, so maybe not. I am also only capturing a single pixel, so that doesn't seem to do much either

[@energistixgames]

Some of these would legit be quite interesting so i definitely want to see you cover all of them

[@firelies]

I feel that all the rest will be actual hell to code, but I believe in you man, you've proven us wrong before. Destroy those leaderboards!

[@WeeHee]

He should just consider controlling the site directly instead of using external programs

[@Drarok]

All of them please. I liked and subscribed, the contract is complete!

[@brflame90]

Evans PC is running on hopes and dreams. Literally everything in his taskbar is open and he has like 80 tabs open in opera.

[@oafkad]

I like that he assumes hes the first person to cheat on this. "its weird that people are better than this." Oh, buddy, they probably are not.

[@myrmatta1]

This would be fun as a full video where you get 99% on all the tests

[@shydx2010]

I was watching the fast reaction time, but then I started to notice stuff. HOW MANY TABS DO YOU NEED OPEN!? WHY IS THERE LIKE 15 APPLICATIONS OPEN!? THERE'S UNINSTALLED UPDATES, PESTERING WITH THAT ICON! What is this mess sir?😅 Love your videos man! Keep em coming.

[@kristiansan11]

Human benchmark without humans

[@PeterPkp123]

Yes man another full length main channel video idea! Do all of them :DDDDDD

[@TheBeriorgar]

i am 100% up to see you destroy the rest of those tests as well

[@C0RRUPT3DITOR]

It's nice that you put "used" rather than "created" in the title. I can get behind using AI that way. Good on ya.

[@kevinbacon8716]

Just seeing how many programs and tabs you have open gave my computer aids. Thanks

[@bramnet]

If your monitor is running at 60Hz, then the auto clicker is getting it (in your last runs) between the first and second frame of green. I have a feeling if you can up the Hz to 144, you could get closer to 8-10 ms.

[@adamrak7560]

or run it without vsync, so the monitor refresh rate is not relevant.

[@bosstowndynamics5488]

​@@adamrak7560It's not a 3D program that exposes those settings, I'm not sure you can switch off Vsync...

[@jansustar4565]

Also, disable everything but a browser, all extensions and maybe even swap to an older browser. and decrease resolution to 50x50px.

[@Ocastia]

Does the program use the actual Image, or just the information what is supposed to be displayed?

[@CaptainBoxtrot]

​@@Ocastiait would be a lot harder to make it read the data since it would need to capture it first, but he says screenshots in the video, so it uses the screen.

[@Crysal]

What I want is to close all your tabs, answer your emails, restart and update, change to 24hour format and check your windows notification

[@smolbirb4]

I’d love to see that! Coding is both horrible and amazing, love it

[@Bearforlife]

I was doing these last night and I was really upset my reaction time was so low compared to the other people playing, seems like a lot of them are bots though. Good to know to not take the standings too personal

[@SunbleachedAngel]

google says average human reaction time is about 250ms, so that website's stats may be either biased or just wrong

[@jogeem5480]

@@SunbleachedAngel I'd say the site appeals more to nerdier people who are more likely to have trained their reaction time in and for shooter games.

[@EEEEEEEE]

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

[@AEONIC_MUSIC]

​@@SunbleachedAngelyeah it's biased since most people that use it are probably gamers and the bots skew it

[@Houshalter]

It seems based on codebullets times, maybe 1% of people are cheating. A lot of work to rig up a bot for a pointless game so that seems pretty high to me. Add 1 percentile point to your score to account for it

[@TheJerseyNinja]

The word remembering one would be pretty easy too. Just create a program to read the word, then check a bank of words, if it’s not already there, click not seen, then save that word to the bank. If it’s already in the bank, click already seen. I feel like you could get that one done extremely quickly too

[@Ethereal_Phoenix_]

Would love to see you take a shot at more of these, some are a bit more interesting for a bot than see green click green.

[@killpidone]

Codebullet never learns that he could throw a conditional check for a magic keybind to exit his loops.

[@Reevin]

Or he leaves that out on purpose for our laughs. 😂

[@fluffyfang4213]

Having done similar automation, that keybind is one of the first things I implement because you're always one misstep away from being stuck in an infinite loop.

[@Kdkreig]

@@fluffyfang4213 As someone who implemented an accidental infinite loop that got more and more calculation intensive on the cpu....lets say that my poor computer started sounding like a jet engine, which was impressive for my little 5th gen i5 at the time. The program started running at 1 frame every once in a while until I managed to kill it. Fixed that problem before I saved the previous stuff.

[@HyCat]

I played the sequence memory and after a while I misclicked and lost my first life and I was bored of it so I lost all my lives on purpose. I got over 30 and was in the 99.9 percentile

[@HyCat]

I've never played it fully

[@blacklight683]

"That's not how you supose to do that"

[@fallencloser5028]

Bro has the whole internet opened in his computer

[@MiningNatureYT]

I can't wait to see CB become the most human human in the world by using a not human to do it for him

[@conspiracydawg]

You know we all want to see you smash those benchmarks.

[@djet00]

Yes. I'll gladly watch more of your shenanigans.

[@gabypounou]

please keep going with this its promising to be very entertaining

[@CardinalSven]

Fun fact: I got 26 milliseconds because I clicked when it was red and by some goofy chance it turned green while I was doing that. Therefore, I am a confirmed superhuman. Edit: I didn't have an account and it's not saved. What an L.

[@Xeogin]

I got into a competition with a friend one night trying to get the lowest one off score by sheer luck. I won with 8 ms

[@adamrak7560]

@@Xeoginit is like when I managed to start my stopper clock and stop it in the same millisecond, because the button glitched (it glitched more than the debouncer was able to compensate, all mechanical switches glitch)

[@deassssssss]

Yes, please cheat the rest of the human benchmark tests. That would be hilarious

[@Drakojana]

Hell yeah I'd love to see a bot bestroy the entire human benchmark test

[@dorianjack]

Ah yes. The “human” benchmark test.

[@force1535]

"From the moment I understood the weakness of the flesh, it disgusted me"

[@Octocat]

I really wanna see you code the heck out of the other Human Benchmarks too

[@starstrike3011]

I got 56 and 100 % in sequence memory i be impressed if a bot beats that

[@RhinoRapscallion]

For saving the mouse, if you’re using pyautogui it has a failsafe it checks for. If the mouse is pushed to one corner of the screen (forget which) by an input device other than python, it raises an exception in any method that takes control of the mouse. You should still build in global failsafes (other than your PC’s reset button)

[@23william90]

I was wondering why his PC seemed so slow. Then I looked at his Tabs and Taskbar. 😂😂😂

[@Chuube]

He sounds like a good uncle.

[@FoxyCS_]

these are my enemies in games

[@MildlyDampElk]

i have never looked over a open tabs search bar so hard before lol

[@cypherial]

Code Bullet singlehandedly ignited my interest in coding and now I'm planning war crimes in Python. Thanks CB!

[@ThousandsOfPk]

Sounds like a main channel series, combine a couple challenges into one if they're nice like this one, if not dedicated eps

[@Connor-Colyer]

Are you in fact procrastinating bullet?

[@lonelyPorterCH]

Crazy how good chatgpt works for that, I love it^^

[@skeereman123]

yeah lmao I just got 3 milliseconds myself manually lmao

[@WAZXIII]

Full video for all of them would be fantastic.

[@itzclearzy]

I used to get like 100 consistantly but not anymore lol 💀💀

[@Bribge]

sequence memory would be really easy to code since the next sequence always starts with the previous one +1 tile. Verbal memory works the same with just adding a new word to the list

[@fehliks8200]

Use selenium and try to find the element by xpath in a loop, it is possible to get 100% percentile, I promise

[@emanwonkon2205]

I definetely want please. Make it into a full main channel video.

[@miguelaguilar5115]

With proper presentation this could for real be a main channel video

[@JessicaFEREM]

You could also try different browsers to see which one has the fastest reaction time

[@scottaxel9782]

Definitely would enjoy a follow up, seems entertaining

[@koiwaiyotsuba]

i remember doing this 2 years ago as my first programming project

[@Polar_Onyx]

so are we going to ignore the fact this man has 3 absolutely full task bars on his screen, how do you get anything done? Maybe that's just my adhd but I would spend half of my time just trying to find the correct tab or window

[@Eban11235]

Chimp test would be very interesting if it's the test I'm thinking of.

[@meapyboy12345]

huh i never even thought that he might have too many tabs open because regularly have about that many open myself sometimes even more.

[@Tom_Dahl]

we did this as a assignment in my CS class in high school.

[@speckkatze]

please try to beat every single human benchmark by humanly developing a script that does it for you

[@hiiamelecktro4985]

I feel like the one where you need to remember if a word a new or not would be really easy.

[@רפאל-ב]

Honestly yeah, would be fun to see all of the tests get demolished

[@rogierownage]

Seeing you do the rest of these would be fun

[@zs9652]

I want to see you do all of them in a full video. That way we know what to expect in the global ai takeover

[@Zaluuk]

Code Bullet: *uses python Me: *uses power automaton

[@MeCooper]

It's amaizing how far technology has come. Just think about it, Maybe in a few more decades technology will reach south korean starcraft player levels of reaction times.

[@jakobrietzler349]

What about spying the web pages divs color and then clicking??

[@galatisc1880]

Sequence memory would be fun to see you max out except getting in top percentile takes over an hour, got 46 in and had to stop because I already spent around 50 minutes and had to be somewhere

[@brunomcleod]

This could definitely be a main channel video; "Using AI to beat human benchmarks"

[@hashtags_YT]

Cant wait for the sequel in C Unironically seems really fun to try and min-max the score, even if you could just cheat by listening for the http request (assuming thats how it works). Gonna give it a shot tomorrow

[@TheChrysaloid]

It's not http. It's all local JS

[@Karateman]

Definitely do 99.99% in all categories. That would be hilarious

[@WeeHee]

why not 100%

[@Alegriev]

We need a vid of breaking all the human benchmarks

[@AEONIC_MUSIC]

The 2nd bot does worse then my average

[@Owen_loves_Butters]

A reaction time less than 100ms is physiologically impossible, so yeah everyone below that is also cheating.

[@joshualeveque972]

a brilliant demonstration of why humans dominate over animals. we just make something that does the job better than us.

[@JessWLStuart]

I think this Human Benchmark is only testing internet latency.

[@russianyoutube]

It doesn't need internet tho

[@JosephParker_Nottheboxer]

Do all of the things and prove you are the best human bean... ever... Be the best human bean!

[@mebbish3574]

my friend used to try and click before the green went off to see if he could predict it. By the time the click was processed the green went off and he got a time of 13ms.

[@gimpy612]

Lets go full video "human" benchmark!

[@AdrianWoodUK]

0:16 - Huh. I just did this benchmark on the site, got an average score of 225ms... And also scored in the 32.9% percentile, exactly the same as you did with 249ms. So either: 1) The recorded stats they have have changed dramatically since you recorded this, with a lot of improved scores just so happening to push the percentile boundaries back in a way that lines up perfectly, or 2) Your autoclicked benchmark did the same thing, or 3) There's something fishy about how they're placing people in percentile brackets. A 10% reduction in my reaction times compared to yours, putting me in the same percentile bracket down to 0.1%? That's... pretty coincidental. (Some people are going to suggest this vid itself prompted that, so to be clear, as I type this, the vid came out an hour ago and has

[@DrVodka9987]

i just did it, got 200ms and 53 percentile

[@samuelmendlowitz7276]

Make this a full video destroying every single one of these

[@wb_better8864]

the amount of tabs is scary

[@gavinpitts5366]

i have a reaction time that looks like lucky gesses decent over all.. and all over place

[@cadewynnttv1627]

100% would watch you trying to get it to do all of them

[@kappasphere]

I think you should have a second account where only the finished autoclicker plays so it doesn't count your bad human scores as part of the average

[@kironikolov6668]

i do in fact want to see you get 99.99% on all of those

[@jennifermorrey7378]

At that point it's not a human benchmark test!

[@kr30000]

It only uses your 5 most recent scores to calculate your percentile. I inspected the main.chunk.js script and you can find that they load a "recent" data set to compare your scores to (maybe from the last day or week) In the data below "id": 0 is the interval for 0 - 25 milliseconds and there's 32 scores recently in that interval. So it's safe to assume a bunch of these are cheating. { "id": 0, "count": 32 }, { "id": 25, "count": 22 }, { "id": 50, "count": 18 }, Note: it's possible to get 100.0 percentile in some of the other tests (the ones marker as higher is better). In those you can score higher than the units they use to calculate the percentile, so it will just give you 100.

[@authenticbanana9505]

I would love to see an automated speedrun of 99.9 percentile all categories to show how humans are the inferior life form

[@jaazz90]

Feels good to know that I still manage to beat OpenAI's code with my puny human hands on the mouse, my time is not up yet

[@unspezifische5924]

Ignoring the part where ChatGPT self-sabotaged by adding multiple `sleep(0.1)` lines? 😂

[@jaazz90]

​@@unspezifische5924 that is on ChatGPT! but yeah getting

[@thelostwanderergames4287]

⁠@@unspezifische5924you computer would explode otherwise running a loop without wait is chaotic to say the least and that’s 0.0001 of a second since sleep is based off milliseconds in python and I’m pretty sure it’s done in python

[@Purple835]

Nice browser! Yeah yeah I know the sponsor from one time was Opera GX and you use it (:

[@MaxyX]

I'd love to see all of these