the best. Sokolov is never afraid to play it his way, to interpret it personally. Thats the way it should be, otherwise the performer would simply be a robot.
@ИринаКалина-ч9п3 жыл бұрын
БРАВО !!! ЛОВЛЮ КАЖДУЮ НОТКУ КАК ГЛОТОК РОДНИКОВОЙ ВОДЫ , В ЖАЖДУ !!!! ВЕЛИКИЙ МУЗЫКАНТ !!!!
@vittoo496 ай бұрын
Thank you for this gift to me.
@nathanrakhlevsky51573 жыл бұрын
Superb!!!!!!!!!
@lluisrafalessole-classical50683 жыл бұрын
Wow Spectacular 🎹
@rekhabhatt67713 жыл бұрын
Why is the duration more than other interpretations I have seen... Somewhere it's 7mins and here it is 13?
@sketchgamma3 жыл бұрын
His tempo is very slow
@stonefireice60583 жыл бұрын
Schubert didn’t time his music, sorry about that. Sokolov with slower tempi gives us full spectrum of emotions, more intense, that we usually miss with faster interpretations, including Richter’s, who I love otherwise. But it’s your choice, what you prefer.
@PedroSouza-lz3gz2 жыл бұрын
The last theme that Sokolov plays was erased on the original edition, but Sokolov plays that last theme. (Claudio Arrau plays this piece with this theme too).
@wolfgangklofat594 Жыл бұрын
@@stonefireice6058 You are wrong in this special case, Richter and Sokolov do play the piece in a similiar tempo and both also play it the original score, of which the composer Schubert later cancelled a part - ignored by these pianists. Anyway, that(!) makes the real difference compared with other interpretations.
@automobilemusicengines Жыл бұрын
The reason being most pianists that perform this piece only play it through the A, B, A structure (the A section being Eb minor and the B section being B minor). However, a handful of performers, including Sokolov, play it with the ABACA structure (the C section being mainly a Ab major trio that Schubert crossed out from his first edition). It's hard to find a score or recording with the ABACA structure nowadays.