Solo 6/6!

[@lemonsorcerer3303]

Great game! Thanks for uploading it! A tip, regarding presence destruction: With a lot of Incarna spirits, you can often safely sacrifice your Incarna instead of other presence, when having to destroy presence. Specifically, at 25:00 you could destroy your Incarna, as Behemoth's special rule can also add it to a land with their sacred site. It wouldn't matter here, but it's good to keep in mind.

[@kelvinkoo6684]

For france 6 rule regarding fear card not removing explorer, you can choose whether or not to push the explorer. It is a “may instead push” on france 6 rule

[@AndreasVNesje]

I love this! Please do more high diff matchups. Doesnt have to be 6/6 to be interesting

[@droid-droidsson]

I thought because Royal Backing specifically says "during setup after adding all other invaders", it would trigger after France's Persistent Explorers, meaning you cannot put the extra explore and the royal backing town into the same land. Not that that would have changed much, I'm just wondering.

[@ryanlackie1129]

@@droid-droidsson I didn’t think about it at the time, but I think you’re right! Turns out Royal Backing is still my Royal enemy….

[@alexmadden4478]

😮😮😮

[@galahadb9723]

Hey Ryan, thanks for your videos. I have never played Ember Eyed Behemoth before, maybe I misunderstand the cards. But from what I read on the wiki, your actions at minute 07:00 seem confusing: Terrifying Rampage reads push 3 Dahan, doesnt seem to be optional. So you shouldnt be able to do damage in Wetlands 2 during the ravage step? Probably only a minor difference though. Blazing Intimidation reads "Push 2 things into a land without Incarna" on the wiki. You pushed one into Wetlands 2, the other into Sands 4. That does not seem quite correct to me as your Incarna was in Sands 4? That may have changed the flow of the game as either you push both explorers into Wetlands 2, causing it to blight (and Mining Rush) or keep one explorer in the Jungle 3, causing it to build and be a problem next round?

[@ryanlackie1129]

@@galahadb9723 you’re right, flat out misuse of those cards. That’s really frustrating for me, but I hope the other decisions in the video can still provide value

[@galahadb9723]

@@ryanlackie1129 Good to know I didnt miss anything about the cards then :-) And yes, I really enjoy your videos! Keep them coming please!

[@lukasb5469]

we need more of double adverseries content!

[@ryanlackie1129]

@@lukasb5469 most 6/6 are not possible solo, but 4/4 is usually doable. Have any particular combinations you would want to see?

[@gregghorwitz8832]

@@ryanlackie1129 Hi Ryan! Love your content! You have an amazing way of communicating your thoughts and I get so much out of watching your playthroughs notwithstanding how enjoyable your vids are to watch! I've been trying Scotland HLS 4/4 for a while and that's been quite tricky for me. If I could be bold enough to suggest that as an option I would be pretty excited :)

[@ryanlackie1129]

@@gregghorwitz8832 I was on vacation when this comment went up, so I apologize I’m just getting back to it now. Do you have any particular spirits you want me to attempt it with?