I built several of the Matchbox version of this, and liked it immensely - being a 'wilderness' aircraft, the range of civil schemes is vast. It's a really unusual subject, which was the USP of the Matchbox kit range. It's an old kit, but easy to modify - like the real aircraft. The only thing I like about the Revell version is that it is moulded in one colour. The moulding on it seems very soft now, which is a pity. I remember the Matchbox ones being pretty crisp.
@NielsenDK-120 күн бұрын
This Matchbox/Revell kit is the only one in 1/72. I build it some years ago on skies in Air Greenland livery. There are som issues with the canopy, nose and tail but only an expert will notice the two latter. Thanks for the review👍🏼🍻
@donalexander411320 күн бұрын
I built one of these in the Matchbox line and enjoyed the build. I applied Alaska Airlines decals in the Golden Nugget livery.
@ModelNerd19 күн бұрын
Nice review. I've always been tempted to get this kit - there's a nice decal set available that includes a British Antarctic Survey version in bright orange.
@ModelMinutes19 күн бұрын
That would be cool!
@markwhnd_89.20 күн бұрын
I actually have that in my basket on amazon it's 18 euro there, good to get the review. thank you very much
@michaelkeogh845420 күн бұрын
Here in the States, you'd be hard pressed to find any kit new-in-box for less than $20 USD in a retail store. So, I'm quite happy to find any model that cheap.
@sandwitch161320 күн бұрын
@modelminutes I believe that the question mark in the instructions next to the landing gear step is there to indicate that you have a choice between wheels, skis and floats.
@ModelMinutes20 күн бұрын
Yes, that is right :)
@ovidiuivanov175317 күн бұрын
I have built two of these in a row. One yellow with wheels and one in the white livery with floats. I enjoyed them a lot, it's a really nice plane to build and look at after it's done, in both versions.
@ModelMinutes17 күн бұрын
Very cool!
@yorkshiremanmodels20 күн бұрын
decent kit mat for a 80s tooled model personally i think revell should use something similar to airfix who use the vintage kit series where you know its a old kit and not to be disapointed in the quality i do wonder if the person who is incharge of the instructions for revell has actually ever built a kit because revell instructions are awful and hard to follow sometimes great unboxing as usual and looking forward to your next one
@CanadianSam99920 күн бұрын
Got to see a real one in Canadian Forces colors recently. There are still four of them in military service in Canada. I have a number of Matchbox and Revell releases to build so I can build wheeled, ski, and floatplane versions in military and civilian schemes.
@NielsenDK-121 күн бұрын
Looking forward to this one😃
@MrKevinbrindle20 күн бұрын
I bought and built this last year from Hobbycraft - a few issues with it definitely, and I ballsed up the weight and ended up waith a tail sitter!!! Looks nice when finished though!
@benmanning434020 күн бұрын
I believe if Revell don't use cartograf for their decals on some kits then they usually use zanchetti out of italy aswell. On the whole Revell decals are generally quite good quality. 👍
@NigelsModellingBench20 күн бұрын
Yes, these are Zanchetti? as there is a "Z" suffix after the number at the bottom left of the sheet. Cartograf has.. you guessed it, "C".
@benmanning434020 күн бұрын
@@NigelsModellingBench I believe that would be the case yes. As someone who has built many Revell kits now, I have found this, however the Cartograf decals are of course the best overall. I'm currently doing a weekend build of Revell's re boxed Frog Ta152 which has excellent quality Cartograf decals 👍 I did build the 1/32 Mosquito MkIV which had the Zanchetti decals which don't age as well as the Cartograf ones...
@Calloumi_Cheese20 күн бұрын
Funny thing is that I just built this kit a few days ago and it was my first model kit I've fully built and painted. I also had some trouble with the confusing paint instructions but in the end, it was a pretty good kit and I recommend doing the yellow and red paint scheme for looks; however, the yellow paint is a bit difficult to apply since it's a lighter colour.
@ModelMinutes19 күн бұрын
I think I saw you post it on Reddit
@Calloumi_Cheese18 күн бұрын
@@ModelMinutes You probably did, I made it just after the comment.
@MisterHampshire20 күн бұрын
I remember making this kit during the early-to-mid-80s. As all Matchbox kits, it was somewhat chunky and clunky, but, as the majority of Matchbox kits of the time, the fit was quite good and, for the time, reasonably accurate, certainly when compared with their competitors of the time.
@AB-mw8oz20 күн бұрын
Built this kit probably about 10 years ago. by no means a bad kit, but it does show its age compared to newer kits. I did it in the Canadian Firefighting scheme, but if I were to get another one I'd do it in the West Coast Air scheme
@mackerel187519 күн бұрын
Just remember to modify the props if you are building a "parked/shutdown" Twotter. PT6 turbines have the props feathered when at rest. As for the nose, check references for the particular plane you're building. DHC-6-100s, and most, if not all float equipped versions, were originally fitted with the short nose, and DHC-6-200 and -300 series had the long nose. The -300s also had slightly (at this scale) different props and exhausts. But... There are long-nosed 100s out there (retrofitted for extra nose locker) and short and long nosed float equipped Twotters out there too! Later engines have been retrofitted to older airframes also. The -400 series, produced by Viking, are another kettle of fish entirely. All in all, a wonderful aircraft!
@ModelMinutes19 күн бұрын
That's interesting, thanks for the info!
@kyleSD70MAC19 күн бұрын
Looks like a fun little kit, just ordered one! I like the West Coast Air float version.
@ModelMinutes19 күн бұрын
Very cool!
@davidhinkson885620 күн бұрын
Matchbox really did produce some unique and interesting subjects in its time and I particularly like the floatplane option. What would have been nice though is a fully detailed passenger compartment given the small size of the aircraft.
@JohnSmith-sl1my20 күн бұрын
Never built this but i may if i find it cheap somewhere. Would build with floots or skids . Look forward to seeing it built 👍
@Aaaeendrew19 күн бұрын
This is a brilliant aircraft, but a woeful kit. Would love to have an up to date tooling of this!
@lpjmodels20 күн бұрын
An interesting kit, don't see too many built up 😮
@andrewgardiner43920 күн бұрын
I’m trying to build this kit at the moment and as much as I was looking forward to it, it’s ended up being a right faff. The fit isn’t great, the clear parts are a headache and keep dropping out…into fuselage no less! Trouble is I love the dehavilland otters so will keep trying with it!!
@erwinvanleijenhorst760520 күн бұрын
I’m building one of these myself now and am really struggling with it. Primarily with how things fit and such. I’mm really curious what your opinion is when you build it.
@andthatt20 күн бұрын
This was my first-ever kit. I got it from my granddad in the set with paints and a brush.
@Payne2view20 күн бұрын
Certainly not a 2014. Its a Matchbox kit, from the 1980's probably. I started building it once but it was such a long time ago that I can't remember why I didn't complete it.
@glencwilson20 күн бұрын
That kit has the honour of being the only one that ended up in the bin. I went for the float plane version and the struts just didn't seem to support the rest of the aircraft weight. Maybe the Matchbox plastic was harder and stronger than Revell's or it was just me.
@NigelsModellingBench20 күн бұрын
Matchbox was harder than Revell for sure.
@ModelMinutes19 күн бұрын
Ah that is a shame :(
@AverageGreaseMonkey20 күн бұрын
Ive worked on these in canada. (Aircraft mechanic) the real thing has its problems to lol.
@goforitpainting18 күн бұрын
Cool model. 🛩
@ModelMinutes17 күн бұрын
Sure is!
@TheNorwegian20 күн бұрын
I always wanted to buy the Matchbox version of this, and modify it to a Norwegian Widerøe version, but never could afford it...
@ModelMinutes20 күн бұрын
This would be perfect if you can find one then - its the same kit really :)
@TheNorwegian19 күн бұрын
@@ModelMinutes I know, Revell took over all of Matchbox' catalogue AFAIK
@Damien-q8t21 күн бұрын
Have 1 of these on the bench as we speak.....and yes,for anyone who is wondering, it IS a reissue of the old Matchbox kit.
@ModelMinutes21 күн бұрын
Yup, I do explore that a little in the video
@Damien-q8t21 күн бұрын
@ModelMinutes excellent....after i get this done i am doing the Revel 1/72 Dornier Do -228.....a very similar aircraft .
@Damien-q8t21 күн бұрын
@ModelMinutes last week i picked up a mint in box Airfix 1/72 Tornado kit from 1975...kit nmbr is 0419-6,series 4...the 3 options on the decal sheet are a West German Navy IDS,an R.AF. Gr1 and the 2nd prototype of when the aircraft was still known as the M.R.C.A.
@vincentlefebvre925520 күн бұрын
I did buy it. It is indeed a former matchbox kit.
@Damien-q8t20 күн бұрын
@vincentlefebvre9255 not a bad kit...considering the toling is 31 years old
@Cheesetaxlord320 күн бұрын
Can you make a harpy hare paintjob for yaeklore harpy hare on a plane or helicopter with Cole on the vertical stabiliser
@ModelMinutes19 күн бұрын
thanks for ths suggestion
@Cheesetaxlord319 күн бұрын
I’d recommend you either watch harpy hare to see Cole or look at a pic of her (so we get business) ok thanks Matt (you also said Ths not the 😂)
@richardsweeney19712 күн бұрын
The kit was originally released by Matchbox in 1983. 🙂
@ModelMinutes12 күн бұрын
Yep, as mentioned in the video 👍🏻
@richardsweeney19712 күн бұрын
@@ModelMinutes yup, sorry, I wrote before I saw the whole video.
@sandwitch161320 күн бұрын
I mean, at least it's dirt cheap... Edit: I see we have a different opinion of the price. To me, £10 for a twin engine of this size in 1/72 is really cheap - you couldn't get a Mosquito or a Mitchell for that cheap, to my knowledge.
@ModelMinutes20 күн бұрын
Yeah, it is pretty cheap, but I think that the quality kind of reflects that. Tbh, its not as big as a B25
@sandwitch161320 күн бұрын
@@ModelMinutes They're nearly identical in size, in fact. The Mitchell is only about 3% larger.
@markshellard589420 күн бұрын
Transfers 😂
@ModelMinutes20 күн бұрын
yep?
@NickAndrewsFaulkner19 күн бұрын
@@ModelMinutes It's what we called them in the 70's! No issues with pronouncing the word unlike the word mangling versions of decals😀