Sony 18-105 F/4 vs Sony 35mm F/1.8

[@jackofclubs002]

I never comment, but I just wanted to say I appreciate your videos and all the time you put into them. You got yourself another subscriber!

[@ArthurR]

focovision Thank you! I'm glad you enjoy them!

[@cliveslack4698]

TechnologyMafia n h

[@MrTechGamer2000]

This has to be the best channel for Sony e Mount related lenses!

[@clarification007]

Now you will need to compare your Sony 35mm f1.8 vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary for Sony E-mount lens!

[@antruong4836]

for video : SEL 35mm, for photo: sigma 30mm.

[@ChrisParayno]

I'll take oss any day

[@smoothmoose]

Suggestion. Compare the 18-105 zoom to the 18-200 and/or 55-210 zoom. For general all-round zoom this is the dilemma that many face including myself. I did end up getting the 18-105 for variety of reasons, but many will wonder if they will miss the extra reach of the other 2 zooms. More importantly, I realized the Clear Image Zoom feature on the Alphas can make up the difference in reach with no image degradation. It would be interesting to actually compare the 105 @2x Clear Image zoom vs. the native 200 or 210 in IQ. My bet is the 18-105 still wins!

[@Kullaniciadibulamadi]

exactly my dilemma for days and months now:))) still couldn't figure out what to buy.

[@pappupappu3084]

You will rise very high. Just try to be humble , honest,and Hard working. Wish you all the best

[@ToddHanson]

You say the comparison doesn't make sense, but as a beginner, I appreciate this comparison. It's nice to see a bit of the capabilities between a prime and zoom lens. I really found the 35 mm vs 99 mm image comparison ( 7:27 ) to be very interesting as I am still trying to wrap my head around how the focal length affects the image.

[@MarlonKingShow]

As always... thank you. I have my eye on the 18-105 as I want a decent zoom lens. A shame there are no f2.8 zoom lenses for the a6500.

[@felixfelix9084]

LEA4 adapter and a mount ;) (lenses for the a77 fo example)

[@alexcrousz]

We got 3 F2,8 lens 3 years later!:D

[@Pululapu]

MAN!!! you're the best. I've just have this question a minute ago and find a video that you made more than a year ago.

[@manoj238]

Same here, I had to choose between A6400 and A6500 mainly OSS over IBIS, he answered that and now this.

[@TheEnergyball]

I'm amazed that since November, when you were excited about having 10,000 subscribers- it's only January and you are at nearly 16,000. Keep up the good work! This was a great video and helpful for anyone shopping around for lenses for an a6000...or Sony emounts for that matter. You've got a nice control on the editing and computer work so moving around and zooming in made perfect sense and was easy to follow your points. Thanks again!

[@SocietateaAscendenta]

4 years later: 172k... this man does a great JOB!

[@itsjustjonnoh]

Thanks for these videos.. I think the 18-105 is great for video due to a "softer" look.. Great for a cinematic feeling in my opinion. the 35mm is defiantly sharper and great for photo's.

[@Amwfilms]

This is an amazing video thank you so much i actually got the 18-105 & i am looking for a prime thanks for showing me side by side the power of prime lens. This video made me sub :)

[@DaveSincere]

Amwfilms I have the 18-105mm and the 50mm 1.8. The 50 mm is fast and sharp.. It takes pics in an instant. Only thing. You have to zoom with your feet. I've grown accustomed to the convenience of the zoom. If I had a choice I'd prob roll with the 35mm over the 50mm. All depending on what you will be using for.

[@smoothmoose]

Amwfilms I got both and both are great for different things. the zoom is more versatile and I tend to use the 35 prime at night. but this review has encouraged me to use the price.e more during the day as well!

[@Amwfilms]

DaveSincere thanks Dave and yeah I am feeling the same way the 35mm equals 50mm after the crop so it's awesome. thought of getting the 24mm but I like the extra mm for the close up look. and I will mostly use this for picture portraits and street photography. I got the 18-105 for all around lens and mostly for video

[@Amwfilms]

smoothmoose yeah I feel the same. I really want to shot at night as well as have a wide aperture for during the day still learning about the camera

[@smoothmoose]

Amwfilms Not getting the 50mm is no-brainer IMO. Just feel too niche and works mainly for portraits. Not wide enough for other stuff, and it doesn't zoom well anyway. If you need to zoom with your feet with the 35mm you'll likely need to with the 50mm also. However, 35 vs 30 vs 24mm. I think that debate is more close on which range is most versatile. 35mm no way you are doing a selfie and even can be restricting for street photography. I actually kinda of wish Sony made a 28/30mm. Even with my 18-105, I know i shoot more often wider than 35, than zoomed. But I guess it depends on what you like to shoot and your style.

[@ashifdx6328]

I already have 16-50 kit lens. Should i buy 18-105 or buy sony 35 1.8 and pair it with the kit lens? For video

[@Pululapu]

i got the same question. which lens you bought?

[@keremdrums81]

@@Pululapu I recommend 18-105 first. It has great flexibility and the only lens in whole e mount which has widest focal lenght. I use a6500 +18-105 mainly.after you feel like you need lower aperture like 1.8 or 1.4 for better low lighr performance, you can consider a prime lens.

[@Pululapu]

@@keremdrums81 Thank you. I just bought the 1.8 and I'm waiting for it.

[@glenn4612]

One thing to notice is 35mm 1.8 has color fringing even after stopping down...where as 18-105 has a green haze in the corners. I have both and 18 105 slacks indoors. My photos suddenly look like they were taken from a smartphone. F4 = high iso indoors. Looking for the Zeiss primes. 24 or 55?

[@TheJJohnsonExperience]

Great video, one question though. Wouldn't the 35mm always be sharper when stopped down to match f/4 aperture of the 18-105? From my experience fast lens are arent as sharp wide open.

[@chrisjamesies]

I think people ask for comparisons like this because they haven't spent a lot of time shooting with both. It takes practice to generate an idea of look and style of a certain lens!

[@RageCage1701]

What would you get if you were trying to select a single all-around travel lens for photo and video?

[@chrisjamesies]

Hands down 18-105. I have both on an a6300. The 35mm is nicer at lower light, smaller and for bokeh at that focal length but you’re limited. Especially since you’re on crop.

[@DDHDTV]

would you recommend ditching the kit lense (hence buying body only) and just go with a 18-105?

[@ldsconvert]

KirbyGoezPink i bought the 18-105g 2 months ago. I have not used the kit since. I have switched back to the 50mm once in a while, but plan on getting rid of 50 and getting the 35 soon

[@RageCage1701]

@@ldsconvert Can you expand on your reasoning? I have the kit and am debating between the 18-105 or the 35 prime as my next lens -- looking for a good all-around / carry-around lens that I can use to shoot photo and video.

[@leedye6687]

My 18-105mm is soft in comparison to my f/1.8. Of course I expected this to a small degree, but not to the extent exhibited. I might try the 16-70 Zeiess lens.

[@BrettMeredith]

I agree, the 35mm is an absolute gem of a lens! Great review.

[@simonelizza]

Great comparison as always! You should definitely try to make a comparison between 16-50 kit lens and 16-70 zeiss lens! It's absurd that no one have ever tested these lenses in the way you do your review! That would be awesome. 💪🏻

[@voltairejohntan]

This is a very good practical review. I have the 18-105 F/4 and waiting for the 35mm F1.8. Just switched from Nikon for portability, being mirrorless and extra features like better autofocus and video system.

[@manoj238]

No kidding... my last decision making searches (camera, lens, gimbal) , your videos show up in google... You really understand the beginners :)

[@templatewhoa6619]

Hey Arthur, thanks for this video reference : 07:48 Can you compare 105mm f4 vs 85mm 1.4? (looking for portrait photography) I am thinking of getting 16mm or 85mm f1.4 (Now i have 30mm f1.4 and 18105) If you can make a comparison, of the above it would be really helpful.

[@georgecantu8040]

Are all his sample shots RAW or jpeg ??

[@DerExperiminator]

Thank You for this nice comparison. But one question for You: Why don't You speak about the colour difference? I own the 18-105 and use it with the a6500. And i really don't like the bluish colour. In Your comparison, it's very good visible, the 35mm lens brings much more red in the picture or rather the 18-105 is filtering it.

[@dominikmirecki6159]

Please compare 18-105 vs 55-210

[@argafirmansyah]

Nice...i just purchase 18-105 last week and thinking to get a sharper low light lense...can you compare this 35mm against canon 50mm f1.8 using adapter? Because the canon 50mm is essentially cheaper...

[@srdjandmitrovic]

Hello Arthur! Which lens gives a better bokeh for portraits? 105mm (fully zoomed) f4 or 35mm f1.8? 35mm worries me about the portrait because I would have to get a lot closer to the person while he is being photographed, I mean less than half a meter if I only photograph the face. With 105mm I would have to move away 1.5m which is acceptable. From the point of view of the person being photographed, I think it's a little awkward when someone so close gets in your face with a camera... Please write me your opinion on this. I have found this infrormation on DOF simulator on web.

[@magunciero]

Another great video!! I was waiting really for pics of the 18-105 in the far range to appreciate the bokeh quality. Btw, congratulations for how well you present the contens: honest, clear and summarising at the end. Good job! In the meanwhile I got also the 35mmf1.8, which after 5 shots became my favorite lense. However, it is has extreme noisy aperture blades. When stopping from f6.3 to f22, you can clearly hear the grinding. As a result, the autofocus over f6.3 gets very loud too. Does it happen also with your lense? Thanks!

[@RageCage1701]

Do you encounter these noise issues when you're shooting video on the 35 prime? It's the one thing holding me back from purchasing it -- I'd like to use it as a mixed-used photo/video lens, but I'm concerning the operation of its motors is going to come into the audio of the video I'll be shooting.

[@LeahConsuelo]

Would you consider doing an intro/overview of using the 35? I've absolutely LOVED your videos with it and actually purchased it thanks to you! However, I am new to interchangeable lenses and it would be very helpful to have an overview to get started. I trust and love your work. I hope you will consider!

[@madmax1412]

I gather your samples are direct from the camera? For some reason, I can not get the same sharpness using the 18-205 on an A6400 even at f/6.3 @ 1/1000 sec at 34mm using eye AF and multiple shot (mid setting). None of the 4-5 shots taken have this level of sharpness on the eye. I would love to know why. For this reason I would like to find a program that can read the EXIF data and show the focus point to confirm where it was at the time the shot was taken.

[@sammyscrap]

This is a really great comparison. It's a good demonstration of what you give up going with a versatile zoom lens versus a prime. It's not easy to realize the advantages of a prime lens without experiencing them.

[@RageCage1701]

If you were picking a single lens to go around on a trip with, shooting photo and video, would you take the 35 prime or the 18-105 zoom?

[@AaronLyons]

@@RageCage1701 I'm annoyed no one answered you. I'm trynna figure out the same thing

[@Narab81]

Hi, thank you very much for all your reviews. I have a question if there is a sound justification to afford 35mm already having 18-105 cause I assume that I could achieve better shots during my city-break trips thanks to prime lens.

[@thedeeptone1986]

Could you do a comparison between the 18-105f4 and the 18-200?

[@Khoozl]

There has been an update on the lens firmware did it have any improvement on the quality?

[@zizu6524]

I am considering the 18-105, but it seems the sharpness is not as expected as what I want

[@ArthurR]

No zoom lens is going to give you the sharpness of a prime, unfortunately. The 18-105 is better than the zeiss 16-70 in my tests.

[@zizu6524]

i am using 50 mm prime lens, I would like to find another replace for my ki

[@frameemotion8037]

You have a video 18-105mm vs 50mm 1.8 ??

[@ivanshafiq2915]

can the f4 lens produce better bokeh when zoomed in over 100mm ? compared to f1.8 35mm

[@saifaldin_]

I had both these lenses for quite a number of years (I’ve since sold the zoom), so although I can’t make a proper test now, perhaps I can still share something from the back of my head. Generally speaking, the 35 at f1.8 gives a shallower DOF than the 18-105 zoomed all the way, wide open . It also has a larger magnification ratio (can focus closer) However, if we talk about bokeh - how nice the out of focus area is rendered, i have to give it to the zoom lens. This is because on the 35 prime, from f1.8 to about f2.8 the image has a bit of ‘bloom’. This is more prominent for close up shots (because of LoCA), and scenes with high contrast lighting. In short, the prime produces more blurry backgrounds, but the zoom produces cleaner, smoother bokeh even though it’s less blurry. For me it’s a tie - either can gain the upper hand depending on the subject and kind of shot.

[@GoferZeroSix]

I was looking for a similar strange comparison between the 18-105mm f/4 and the Sigma 30mm F1.4 Contemporary DC DN. The Sigma is affordable and the limitations of f/4 on the 18-105mm for low light and indoor keep me from using my A6300. Although this was a Sony to Sony comparison, it was enough to show me there's a big difference in the extra stops. Thanks (already subbed).

[@str8poisintv131]

the shot of you holding both the 18-105mm and the 35mm...what lens did u catch that shot with?...

[@ArthurR]

That one was shot with the trusty 16-50mm kit lens!

[@str8poisintv131]

wow...u must have gotten the god roll copy of that lens lol. ive only been using it when i bring my gimble, out you just made my camera bag a few grams heavier i gotta bring this lens with me every where now just in case . keep up the vids and thanks for the reply

[@vizualizefilmsllc6225]

Great video, i know you are matching specs across the board, but I was wondering how much on the ISO you feel you will need to "bump up" on the 18-105 to match the Prime Lens specs?

[@zionlion02]

Great vid. I've been looking at both of these lenses, so nice to see the comparison. Would be interesting to see you compare the 16-70 Zeiss as well. Lots of online discussion of that lens vs the 18-105.

[@Eric-vh7bl]

I felt the same problem with Sony 18-105 lens that is less sharp, the prime lens is still the best choice to produce sharp images, but thanks alot for your video.

[@akaPepinho]

I bought this lens (Sigma 19mm) but I have a big big problem ... when I record with autofocus on the A6000 the clip is very flickering along the edges of the video ... some help?

[@clarification007]

I have that 19mm on my Sony A6000 50% of the time and the Sigma 60mm 50% no problem at all, superb lenses. But since I have that A6000 I would love to get that Sony 18-105mm (I love mainly fix lens). It is not as sharp as Zeiss, but the price is OK for me with Sony lens.

[@T-Slider]

Why do you prefer the Sony 35mm 1.8 over the 30mm 1.4 Sigma.

[@ChazzProduction10]

I've been thinking of getting a 10-18mm lens from Sony , It would be nice if you made a review on it. I like seeing your reviews on lenses since it does help me decide wether I want to buy it or not. And so far I've gotten 18-105 & 35mm from Sony but I'm also interested in seeing your thoughts on the 10-18mm

[@g2gggg]

Hello, Stupid question: is clear that the 35 takes more sharpen imagines. But, can this sharpening be obtained on g lens photos in lightroom, by using sharpening/clarity/texture sliders, or is another kind of sharpening you are reffering to?

[@erlisabr]

i bought the prime lens as u recommended, but got 1 problem with the angle..i have to walk back far far away to have a full frame...and thats annoyed me...im looking for an affordable lens that can do wide range...any recommendations? oh i have a favor for ur video..can u compare the lens side by side with the same spot like u did on the 35mm vs 50mm thanks love you video

[@offset4853]

i am a beginner what all around lens i will ever need on a 6500

[@ArthurR]

Kit lens. Start there.

[@TetrahedronIX]

I got this lens best off your earlier videos. I love it, I also got the Rokinon 12mm which I love to, but having a manual lens really makes you appreciate the OIS and the best autofocus system around.

[@johnadams9044]

This video puts the kabash on the Sony 18-105 mm G lens. Zoom lenses are all about convenience at the serious expense of every other performance parameters. Thanks for this video.

[@anetalukescikova6804]

What is the lense you are shooting yourself talking? Looks great... I have a dilema between Sony and Lumix cameras. I have limitd budget nd want to shoot amateur films. Lumix G80 has in body stabilization but this is a way better image quality

[@2012planetxcom]

Hello great stuff , is it possible to get two photos side by side, the same image with 1.8 and f4 but adjusting the ISO on 18 to 105 to get the brightness the same

[@george.8522]

Hey! So I just got myself an A7iii! What would you recommend getting out of these two lens!? I already have the kir len (28-75mm).

[@conraddevera]

Need some input. I have the 35mm 1.8, and only plan to get 2-3 lens. Should I get 18-105 or the sigma 16mm? I know they are different. I guess my question is, given enough lighting, is the 18-105 close to sigma 16mm? I'm thinking, if they are close, it might be wroth the price difference so I can get a zoom lens. Thanks

[@paciulon]

Which of those lenses would you recommend strict for videomaking with Sony A6000?

[@ArthurR]

mkay If you don't have a kit lens, the 18-105. If you have a kit lens, get the 35mm.

[@RageCage1701]

@@ArthurR Could you expand on this reasoning a bit? I have the kit lens and am trying to pick a new lens to act as an "all-around" / travel lens that I can use for shooting photo and video. Gun to your head, you have a kit lens, a 35mm prime, and the 18-105 on a table and you can only pick a single lens to bring with you for a few weeks trip, photo and video both planned, what are you taking?

[@evagurning2663]

Hi, what microphone did you use while you were filming the video?

[@zero2nfinite]

Yet another great video! Looking forward to see you do reviews on Sony's 16mm and 20mm wide angle primes!

[@ArthurR]

Yes, I want to look at the 20mm. Most say the 16mm is pretty bad.

[@fariznur]

TechnologyMafia 16 mm is garbage tho, regret for bought those lens

[@sathishpastor9608]

Which lens best sir

[@charlottesplayground1096]

I use the sony f1.8 50mm for low light but thinking of getting the 18-105 for the zoom range. But when i see these results you sacrefice quite a lot in qaulity for it

[@kelvinwijaya1604]

awesome videos,very helpful,however im curious about those pictures,you shoot in RAW or FINE?

[@somboonvorapanyasakul417]

I own a A7R2 with FE 35mm f1.4 lens and a 6300 cameras. I am thinking whether to get a E35mm f1.8 lens to compliment the 6300 or just use the FE35mm with it. I like the E35mm f1.8 because of the weight. What do you think?

[@paulstevens2839]

I think this is a fair review. I always wanted to know the differences between kit lens vs low light primes

[@RageCage1701]

What is your overall takeaway from the review?

[@JDogProductions]

This was great! I have the 35mm f1.8 and been thinking of getting the 18-105 as an all round lens

[@somboonvorapanyasakul417]

I got the 18-105 and it a great all around lens. I even use it on my A7R2 because of the weight.

[@sammiedog4]

Have the Sony 18/105. Great results. No difference to 100% vs. 99%.

[@crossrevealed3563]

I was thinking about getting the 35 for wider shoots would it be great for that???

[@HelgaChrist]

I love travelling but I hate carry many lens should I buy 35mm or 18-105 mm? mostly I use for video and portrait

[@robertsacamano]

Hey, I just bought an A6000, just the body of the camera, which lens would you recommend for me to buy, keeping in mind the price?

[@pedro0563]

gaz88 this Lens. If you prefer primes, Get the sigmas (19mm, 30mm, 60mm. All three are F2.8). They are the best bang for the buck in photography. They are really sharp.

[@KaiyiHall]

Can you compare the 18 - 105 to Tamron 28 75? I am stuck in between the two.

[@wilsoncheng2517]

I suggest you to take a look at SEL1670Z. It would be interesting if you can compare it with SEL18105G. The battle of these two zoom lenses have always been come around for Sony APSC users I own SEL1670Z and the color is really amazing.

[@PixelSplash999]

Would you be willing to compare the Sony 35mm 1.8 with the Zeiss 35mm 2.8? Would be very interesting to see the results.

[@jas77450]

Good comparison, like your vids...can you please review the 18-2000 silver lens?

[@p7272]

I wish you could have included how the 6000 performs with both lenses using the auto settings. Thanks again.

[@BigBoss-gb4cx]

If you can choose only one which would that be?

[@Magowls08]

Hey I wanted to ask you if you could post somewhere pictures you've taken with your sony a6000 because I'm thinking about buying it and I want to take a closer look at some photos! I'm a bit worried about the quality of the pictures. Thanks in advance

[@Kim-is7vs]

Magowls08 they're a very high quality images.. It's the mAtter of which lens are you using

[@FahadKahut]

This is really helpful, I got both of these lenses for my fs5 but can u please suggest some other E Mount zoom lens with maximum f stop of f2.8? I am looking for E mount solution to 70-200 etc

[@fabianmac-namara8371]

Hi Arthur, great reviews. Will the Sony 35mm 1.8 work on my A5100 camera? Thank.you

[@kevindoh14]

FYI--- Your short links to amazon are expired on a TON of your videos! Great stuff, but you should get a better solution to the links in the "About" section

[@ArthurR]

Thanks for the heads up! Which ones? I just went through and tested all of them and they seem to work.

[@billycool7927]

I'm really curious how the kit lens stacks up against the 35mm 1.8. i just got the a6000 with the kit lens and am curious to seee on what I'm missing out on. if you get a chance, can you do a comparison. thanks

[@apamacam4838]

Billy Cool He already did. Check his channel.

[@RageCage1701]

There's no comparison -- the 35 prime is significantly sharper and faster. Unless you'll REALLY miss the range variety on the 16-50, the 35 would be a HUGE upgrade.

[@ahmedsolieman5556]

Can'rt make my mind about which one to purchase: 35 f 1.8 or 24 f 1.8 ? I mainly shoot videos on a6500 and hate the kit lens

[@saebacu]

What do you think about the sony 16-55 f2.8 and the sony 18-105 f4 ?

[@AleksandarRoman]

Great video, really helped a lot. Can you do a video comparison of 16-70 f4 vs 18-105, and also 18-105 vs 15-200. Thanks and keep up the great work!

[@andyh4241]

Hi can u compare the kit lens and the 18-105 G lens? I was thinking to get the 6300 body, not sure which lens to get. Thanks for the videos!

[@Cloud-db6zb]

I think he already did

[@ArthurR]

Yes, check out my video from a few weeks ago. In summary, both lenses are pretty close, slight edge goes to the 18-105, and when you factor in the F4 vs F5.6 after 30+mm, the 18-105 excels. The only drawback is the larger size.

[@jonolid]

love your videos. I have the Sony a6000 and just got the 35mm. looking at getting a zoom lens also, keep up the good work my friend!

[@ArthurR]

Awesome, thank you for the compliment! Enjoy your A6000 and the 35mm!

[@BigBoss-gb4cx]

I dont get it, shouldnt the right one's ISO higher than 100? Was it a mistake or how is it it's just as bright as the left one?

[@BarefootMediaTV]

im switching from panasonic to sony. Im getting the sony a6500 and im assuming the 18-105 for my all around broll camera. Any suggestions on 2 cheaper primes? one for wider vlogging (20-30mm maybe?) and one for interviews (50-85mm?) Any suggestions with the 3 best lenses i am looking for at a cheaper price but with good autofocus

[@andrespena3184]

you should be shooting RAW. While looking at the fine JPEG results off the camera isnt a terrible way to compare pictures, it's not truly accurate. one could make a better comparison by the results attainable through processing RAW.

[@ray-raym6551]

Could you do a comparison of the 18-105 vs the Carl Zeiss 16-70 ?

[@ScrapZero]

I concur!

[@cestcalatruitevolcan6376]

Great video! Can we use the 18-105 with a sony A7 II?

[@pablodoncor]

Hi, regards from Argentina. I've been watching your videos quite a lot lately. Thanks for such a good informative videos. I've already a Sony a6000 body, plus the 35mm 1.8 prime lens. I've been happy about it, but there were moments I couldn't reach places without a zoom lens. So, what should I buy? 10-105, 16-50 kit lens other options? I'm struggling a bit with this. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

[@flickclips5760]

Excuse me May i ask your opinion? So, i just bought sony a6000 (body only) and want to choose lens for the needs of portrait, traveling and video. Whether sony lens E 35mm f / 1.8 OSS match with that? And also i have 10-18mm canon lens that i want to pair with sony camera, what brand adapter that could possibly match and quickly respond to autofocus and whether the result is good ? I hope ur answer could help me Thank you so much

[@mobashirmohammad5953]

Thanks a ton for this awesome comparison. Wished it was there a week ago when I was deciding between these two as a newbie. Glad that I went with 18-105 for more flexibility like you mentioned. Time to play with a6300 :D

[@21jmack21]

Great job. I love how you compare lenses. I am noob in photography and have an A6000. I subscribed a while ago. Keep up the good work. Do you think I could compensate for the aperture by using a camera with in-body stabilization and longer shutter speed?

[@heyitzLou]

Got any zeiss lens to compare for a future video?

[@ArthurR]

louman-eightyfour I've been eyeing the zeiss 24mm and the 16-70. I'm a bit worried about buying the 16-70 because I've read about the QC issues, but I will definitely do a zeiss comparison in the near future!

[@Scorge120]

interesting, thanks for the comparison. I have the 35mm, going to be adding the 18-105 soon!

[@LoverOfTech]

Looks like if you have an A6300 or even A6500 especially the A6300, these two are the only lens you need

[@AmanChauhan.1111]

Please make video on 18-105 G vs 16-70 Zeiss

[@caslavvukojicic6412]

Which zoom lens do you recommend for taking videos with sony a7sII

[@HollyHuntty]

so grateful for this because im trying to figure out what lens I really need for portraits but also everything else I want/need

[@InsideSomething]

Really like your lens reviews with the a6000. Will you review the zeiss lenses, sel24f18 and sel1670, and compare them to sel35f18 and sel18105g?

[@bongwendy7589]

If u choice which one you pick between sigma 30mm 1.4 or sony 35mm 1.8 ?

[@renielbarnutts55]

Can u do Sony 35 f1.8 oss vs. tamron 28-75? Using 6400. Thank you so much