SONY 70-200 F4 vs F2.8 G Master | Which Telephoto for Sony Mirrorless Cameras

[@jimmyhidalgo2680]

I had the 70-200 F4 and i decided to upgrade, i definitely do not regret my decision. I agree with everything in this video but the f4 vs f2.8 is what made me switch, i love shooting low light. The IQ seems better imo also, sharper, more contrast, and less haze when the subject is backlit Great video you earned a new sub!

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey Jimmy! That's the case. If you are shooting a lot in low light than the Gmaster is your best choice. When I was starting with the Sony system, I bought the F4, because I was not using the 70-200 that often. However the F2.8 and smaller minimal focus distance is a big thing now for me :)

[@WayanSam]

totally agree. im looking to upgrade after testing the 2.8 a few yrs ago in a japan camera shop. the quality and IQ is streets ahead of the f4. This video doesnt give justice to the 2.8. But great video nonetheless. Sub’d as well.

[@Martin-nu6ym]

I went with the GM for many reasons: 1) Low light event photography 2) I can add the 1.4x TC so that I can have a 280mm f/4 3) The tripod foot is interchangeable with my 100-400 GM which I replaced with a Kirk foot that also accommodates for the QD socket for rapid removal of the strap for tripod usage 4) Constant close focusing instead of variable 5) I already have 77mm filters which I prefer over stepdown rings 6) Helps me workout my arms 😛

[@MartinNemeth]

Nice choice :). That's what I had in mind. GM is better for people who are using it for reasons :) However for people who just would like to have 70-200 just in case, I would recommend getting the cheaper F4 and invest the price difference in something else :). But anyway, great choice :)

[@quasiguy]

Well done! I appreciate your candor. On the first two images, I "thought" I liked the second images best...which were taken with the F4 (which I already own). You just saved me $1200! Thanks!

[@MartinNemeth]

You're welcome :) The F4 is really good. There's no need to upgrade if you don't really need closer focus distance and F2.8 aperture.

[@deathbystereo-]

I’d grab the f4 and another dope prime for same price as the 2.8

[@MartinNemeth]

My words :) Or you can get ND's, mics, or lighting :)

[@Mr_Wht]

Facts

[@rkdazet]

Thanks. A bit hard to concentrate on what you are says with the distracting background music.

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx for stopping by. Yes, I know. Unfortunately, with YT you cannot replace the video without loosing all comments and views :(. I have learned and other videos are mixed better I believe :)

[@richardpcrowe]

I shoot with the Sony 70-200mm f/4 G OSS lens... Regarding the lens hood: I replaced the OEM lens hood with a generic round screw-in hood which provides equal protection against flair and bumps but, allows me to rotate a CPL by simply rotating the hood. Regarding the Tripod ring: I replaced the OEM tripod ring with an eBay ring that includes an Arca Convertible foot; negating the need for a seperate A/C adapter between my A/C tripod clamp and the lens...

[@MartinNemeth]

Nice modifications :)

[@caesarbell]

The f.4 has more contrast, as story learned, Rolleiflex with Planar 2,8 was a perfect lens but less contrast than the brother 3,5, so the modern zoom, the f.2,8 are bigger and heavier than the f.4, with more shallow depth of field, soft and detailed. Personally I prefer the contrast of the f.4 considering I use always prime lenses and the 70/200, 3 or 4 time per year ( Canon EF f.4 IS + Sigma MC11 )

[@MartinNemeth]

My words :) Recently I made a followup video about some points you've mentioned here :). Btw. Thanx for stopping by. :)

[@rga66]

Interesting review where you confirmed exactly what I think since a while... I purchased the FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS and the FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS istead of the f/2.8 relatives and with the price difference (actually even less), I prefered to add the Sigma Art 50mm f/1.4 and 105mm f/1.4 lenses for the situations where I really need a bigger aperture !!! That choice has two huge advantages... 1. The f/4 lenses are lighter and more compact which is the purpose of using small mirrorless bodies ! 2. If I need more than f/4... f/1.4 is better than f/2.8 !!!! Extra bonus... These 4 lenses are cheaper than the two f/2.8 GM ones ;-) And these Sigma Art primes are simply absolutely AMAZING !!! Only my opinion but I think it makes sense ?!

[@MartinNemeth]

Great choice in my opinion. I don't have experiences with SIGMA lenses, but I want to try the Art series in near future. So far I have only native SONY / ZEISS glass.

[@rga66]

@@MartinNemeth When I was in need of a fast 50mm I wanted the Sony Zeiss 50mm f/1.4 but didn't have the budget at that moment... So I decided to purchase the Sigma Art 50mm f/1.4 and later, sell it and get the Zeiss when the budget would be available ! But using the Sigma made me realise that it was as good or even better as the Zeiss... At least for sharpness and rendering ! Since then I'm a huge Sigma Art fan and honestly, If I'm still a Sony Alpha shooter it's because of the Sigma Art line and all that absolute amazing glass ! 50 and 105mm f/1.4 are two beasts... The 85mm f/1.4 is among the sharpest lenses ever seen and the 135mm f/1.8 is also absolutely magnificent. But in my case, my next Sigma Art prime will be the 35mm f/1.2 !!! ;-) Their zooms, 14-24 and 24-70mm f/2.8 are also fantastics peaces of glass ! No need to pay double for GM lenses for having amazing results with the amazing Sony Full Frame sensors ;-) I'll puchase only two GM lenses in the near future... The 70-200 f/2.8 GM for Pro shootings, like weddings, portrait or event type shoots, like concerts... And the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM for wildlife and aviation photography !!! But I'll keep going witn my two f/4 lenses for daily and travel photography, because the 24-105 and the 70-200 f/4 are absolute must have and I was never disapointed by them ! I also love my tiny 28mm f/2 for some occasions and it fits in my "Go Bag" all the time because it's so small and lightweight (and cheap) !

[@petrub27]

if you are poor, yes

[@ianplested7874]

Nice video but can you make the background music a little quieter for the next one please.

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx for stopping by :) I am aware of that. If there was a possibility of replacing video on YT I would do that. My newer videos are better balanced I believe :).

[@jakepollen6839]

Nah bro great video krank thoz mf beats

[@MartinNemeth]

:D glad you like the music

[@jody8717]

No problem with the volume. I could still hear him. U Probably Got some sound filtering or focusing issues 😂

[@ZoltanF1LH]

One major difference is that only the f2.8 allows you to use the teleconverters if that's important to you. Differences in image quality would probably show up in backlit scenarios when controlling flare is crucial and in the amount of contrast, and also in the corner sharpness. Both of these are important in landscape photography. But even in those scenarios there is not a huge difference.

[@MartinNemeth]

I agree. There are scenarios where you really want to have the f2.8, but that is totally subjective :)

[@ZoltanF1LH]

@@njrtech I've ordered the Sony 70-200mm/f2.8 GM II 😁👍

[@end_theinflu]

worth to buy new in 2023 for 800 $ ?? :) i use Sony a7c

[@rajatcoool]

Hi Martin, The price of Sony 70-200mm f/4 G OSS lens has come down to $1300, so would you still recommend Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 that sells for $1200. Earlier the Sony one was more expensive so people preferred Tamron 70-180, but what's the verdict now? I am considering it for my Landscape Photography.

[@MartinNemeth]

Hi Rajat. Unfortunately, I have no experiences with the Tamron. They’re pretty close in price, which means you will save only $100. In this case I may still go for the native Sony glass. The 70-200 f4 is a solid glass for sure. My advice would be this: If possible, I would rent both lenses at the same time for a day or two and I would shoot some test comparison shots. If low light is what you are going after (mainly for video) maybe Tamron will be the way to go. For landscape photography, you can set the camera to the tripod and use longer exposure. I mean, that F4 should not be an issue even in low light for this purpose. Anyway. Your best option is to rent them before purchasing. :)

[@rajatcoool]

@@MartinNemeth Thanks Martin for a quick response. Renting is a good idea. Great advice

[@MartinNemeth]

@@rajatcoool You’re wellcome :). To be honest, I would do that (rent) regardless of any review. A review can tell you only so much. Personal experience is invaluable. :) Good luck and let me know about your choice if it’s ok with you :).

[@rajatcoool]

@@MartinNemeth oh yeah. I will share my experience. I am waiting for a good deal so might wait for a couple of months.

[@MartinNemeth]

@@rajatcoool Good luck :) Hope you will be satisfied with your choice.

[@TheOldKenobi]

Bought the F4 version!!! Thanks

[@MartinNemeth]

Glad it helped. I hope you are enjoying the lens!

[@DAvE9518]

Hey Martin, did you notice the autofocus sound? The gm is supposed to be louder while the f4 is basically silent. Is that true?

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey David, thanx for stopping by! Well, the af sound is nothing to worry about. It's nothing terrible. When you take photos with it, you won't notice it that much and if you are shooting an interview (on 70mm) for example, you will use a law mic or a shotgun mic on a boom pole, so you will not hear it in your clip. :)

[@jimmyhidalgo2680]

David Teufel i have used both and i can confirm this, the f2.8 makes a little sound, you can def hear it if the room is dead silent, although outside the GM you cant rly hear it. And yes the f4 is completely silent

[@DAvE9518]

@@jimmyhidalgo2680 Thanks for your answers! I just switched from the f4 and was a tiny bit concerned that there might be something off because the f4 is literally silent. Can I ask the both of you another question? I have never been on a different camera system and I noticed, that the 70-200 2.8 is not 100% tight on the mount. There is a tiny tiny bit of radial play when I have it on the camera. Is that normal? Haven't had that with other lenses on my a7III. Picture quality is awesome so nothing to worry about that but I was just wondering why that might be

[@jimmyhidalgo2680]

David Teufel i never noticed that on mine but with some force it does slightly move

[@schoeferfilm]

Great video Martin 👍🏻 I need a tele lens for my FX6 for filming (not foto) and I think the 70-200 mm f4 would be a great option 🎥 best cinematic greetings from germany

[@MartinNemeth]

Thank you very much! I really appreciate your comment. Yes, the F4 is really nice. If you don’t need excelent low light performance, you will be happy with it. However, the dual native ISO might also solve the low light issue with F4 :)

[@garybrown9719]

I could tell on f4 b2 and c1 Great video

[@MartinNemeth]

Gary Brown thanx a lot :)

[@garybrown9719]

@@MartinNemeth heres all i would need $2000 A7rIII $ 550 55mm 1.8 sony $ 700 28-70 2.8 tamron $ 700 70-200mm sony f4 $ 550 12mm 2.8or15mm f2 laowa $ 250 2x tele $ 100 extntion tube $ 350 macro 60mm laowa $5200 the new a7c looks tempting but looks small

[@gayoso87]

hello, could you tell me if you have a rubber band to seal the bayonet. thanks

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! Thank you for stopping by :) No, unfortunately the 70-200 F4 does not have that rubber seal.

[@gayoso87]

@@MartinNemeth thanks for answering

[@MartinNemeth]

@@gayoso87 You're wellcome.

[@lermil9]

I'm gonna buy the f4. Very helpful video, thanks.

[@MartinNemeth]

Thank you for watching :). I am glad it helped and I hope you will be satisfied with the lens :)

[@JustDavidMinistries]

Thank you for this beautiful comparisons. I love my F4 version and I thank GOD for it

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx for stopping by. Yeah, it’s a great lens. :)

[@JustDavidMinistries]

@@MartinNemeth It truly is.

[@FretsMcGee]

@@JustDavidMinistries i shoot some low light car photography (drifting) and race cars, should i not even consider the f4 or

[@JustDavidMinistries]

@@FretsMcGee I suggest you go for the F2.8

[@kenkazuto6277]

3:53 I think you should make side by side comparison. It is very difficult to see the difference if you compare like that. Anyway thanks for the video.

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey, good point. Thank you for watching and leaving feedback. Much appreciated! Hope you’ll have a nice day.

[@billzidis2656]

Very good Martin but for me Sigma 70-200 Sports with the MC11 for £1100 New... Works perfect

[@MartinNemeth]

Great. I might try this one out someday.

[@billzidis2656]

Don't forget your gym membership! It may be handy

[@MartinNemeth]

Especially for a whole day wedding shoot or something like that :)

[@billzidis2656]

@@MartinNemeth I did one event already.After a while you get used to it. Although i used only the 70-200 that day so that helped and no speedlights. Was fine :D

[@kolapyellow7631]

Where do they make these lenses??

[@MartinNemeth]

"Made in JAPAN" That's on my 70-200 :)

[@kolapyellow7631]

Where do they make a7ii and the kit lens ? Mine said Thailand. Should they have been made in Japan?

[@carlossantini]

What about Sony 70-200 f4 vs Tamron 70-180mm?? Price is close.

[@MartinNemeth]

Good question :) However I don't have personal experience with the Tamron. Anyways, great idea for a future video :)

[@user-dh5fp4gw1b]

So did u make a desision i cant decide myself

[@carlossantini]

@@user-dh5fp4gw1b got the 70-180! Very happy! Only drawback, no collar mount!

[@MikeMikeYT]

Are my eyes broken? The F4 examples looked sharper to me.

[@MartinNemeth]

I was surprised as well. The only downside for me is the f4 aperture. Thank you for watching my video.

[@MikeMikeYT]

@@MartinNemeth thank you for making it brother!

[@MartinNemeth]

@@MikeMikeYT You're wellcome

[@roberteneslatt5702]

The G-master is justified when shooting any moving person or object, such as sports, and definetely indoor sports or sports in non-ideal lighting. This because of the f2.8 ofc but also it is for me much more tack on AF than the f4.0. For me it was therefore worth the extra money to upgrade from my previous f4 to the 2.8 G-master.

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! Thanx for stopping by :) Yeah, that's exactly what I had in mind. For these specific purposes is the G Master the best choice! However for someone who want's to have a telephoto for occasional use, I would recommend the F4 and save money for something with more frequent usage. :)

[@roberteneslatt5702]

Martin Nemeth agree. My previous Sony 70-200 f4 G OSS was really a great lens for almost everything calling for 70-200 focal length. What could be an alternative for many is the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 art for Canon with MC-11 adapter. That crestes a really affordable 70-200 f2.8 with great IQ, but for me that combo came short to not bad, but still lower AF performance Vs. the G-master. Thanks for great review BTW!

[@MartinNemeth]

Thank you! I am glad you like it :). I don't have any experiences with the Sigma, but I hope I will be able to try it someday. I would like to test out another Sigma Art line lenses.

[@roberteneslatt5702]

Martin Nemeth Looking forward to such reviews!!! I am really impressed by my first Sigma glass, which is a Sigma 35mm f1.2 art. It i huge! -But it delivers awesome sharpness and beautiful creamy bokeh. And all AF works like it would be Native Sony, including Eye AF.

[@MartinNemeth]

Now I'm even more hyped to test them out :). I have to rent them (at least some of them) in the near future. :) Thanx for great tip!

[@jtwolfstories]

Nice job, man. Keep it up and you will be one of the big shots on here. (Edit) You are totally correct: the f4 is fine for most of us. I admit I thought the G Master had more detail in the portrait of the girl, but the detail was of her skin imperfections. The f4 looked better and you can adjust in post. The f4 seems like a no brainer unless you are shooting sports at midnight. On the other hand, I have the Sony f4 24-70 and it is total garbage in any low light, so hopefully the 70-200 is better than that. We shall see.

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx man! I have been not really active here for some time now, but I'm "powering up" and I already have prepared 2 new vids :) . To your comment. It's definitely not a low light king ( I mean 70-200 f4), but as you've mentioned, it's good for most of us :). Anyway, Sony mirrorless cameras are great in low light, so they will be forgiving. :)

[@mrz1342]

You made my decision :) pls introduce a same economy but sharp sony lens for portraiture and wide landscape?

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! Thanx for stopping by :). I've been not really active here for some time :(, but I think, that it's time for me to move on and try to continue with making vids here on youtube :). To your comment now. I really like the 55mm f1.8 for portraits. You can find a video on my channel about that lens. :). For landscape I have the 16-35mm f4, But I would go for a g-master version here. It's more expensive, but you will use it in more scenarios (unlike the 70-200 f4 vs f2.8 battle) :) .

[@eucsvoboda]

u need to compare f4 and f2.8.

[@MartinNemeth]

I think I did that in the video :)

[@macaciobchodik7025]

Good video. Thanks for sharing your experiences.

[@MartinNemeth]

You're wellcome. If you have any suggestion on what you want to see on my channel, feel free to tell me :)

[@thomaan]

Love these type of videos

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx man. I appreciate it! If there is a topic you would like me to cover, feel free and tell me :)

[@Sunnyc432]

Bought the F4 version. Thanks .....

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! You're wellcome. I hope you will be satisfied with that lens :).

[@Alberto.LIS.Morais]

Some times, it looks to me the F4 is a bit sharper in the middle……

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey, thank you for watching. It is much appreciated. I came to the same conclusion, which was shocking to me, because I liked the F4 version a little more than the GM.

[@Alberto.LIS.Morais]

@@MartinNemeth the decision of buying one off them , should be very well balanced , I don’t think i have a situation we’re i need to shoot f2.8, with 70-200 lens. The price, the weight, and the overall use of it, must be taken into account. But for me in particular the sharpness is a big one.

[@MartinNemeth]

@@Alberto.LIS.Morais yes, i know what you mean and I share your oponion. It is a special focal length and I also cannot find much use cases for F2.8

[@desertoo23]

Very nice video... and one more subscriber. I am also a Sony shooter, a happy one by the way!

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx for stopping by and for hitting that SUBSCRIBE button :). It means a lot to me. I hope that you will also enjoy also other videos. Btw. If there is something you would like me to cover in my videos, feel free to reach out! :)

[@Shaykin1]

great video !!!

[@MartinNemeth]

Thank you! I appreciate it.

[@ronstar7027]

You never mentioned the wider aperture advantage. That's the main reason for the larger lens to be superior. In low light situations, the f2.8 is best.

[@MartinNemeth]

I think I have mentioned, that if low light is something you are going for, the GM is the way to go. However I didn't want to touch on that in this video. I thought that it is obvious that F2.8 will be much much better for low light than the F4. I wanted to compare these lenses at the same conditions to see if there is a significant difference in the image quality. And ... there is not. So my point is that you are paying extra $1000 for that F2.8. Many people, who do not care that much about low light, may save $1000 and invest that in some other stuff (ND's, cards, other lens, ...). :)

[@apereeira]

To me the f4 seems sharper actually in the test

[@MartinNemeth]

I had the same feeling when I was making this video :) Btw. Thank you for watching!

[@Rattler]

Большое спасибо, выбор сделал в пользу F4

[@ayhancapan]

I'm in between 70 - 200 f2.8 gmaster and 55 - 210 for my a6000 :D

[@MartinNemeth]

Have you already purchased one of these? :)

[@ayhancapan]

@@MartinNemeth Yeah, a second hand 55 210 I had bought. Loved the lens. But there was a dust inside (he said that it was as good as brand new). That's why i sent it back to the owner. And took my fund back. I'm looking for a clean and a cheap one :) Just a week before I've checked another second hand 55 210. Lens was totally covered with dust in camera gear shop. How can they run a business like that. I'm out of my mind.

[@MartinNemeth]

@@ayhancapan I wish you luck. Hopefully you’ll find a fitting one. :) It’s really hard sometimes with second hand gear.

[@Peterogen]

Thank

[@MartinNemeth]

You’re wellcome. I’m glad you liked the video :)

[@Phototravellingitalia]

MOLTO ONESTO! Prenderò f4!

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! Thanx for stopping by :). You can't go wrong with the f4. :) Have a great day!

[@sonicstep]

01:53, Excellent idea💡

[@MartinNemeth]

Yeah, It's really handy :)

[@jsavak99]

Yeah but you can do more at F2.8

[@MartinNemeth]

Agreed. However if you don't care about low light and better min. focus distance, I think you can invest the $1000 to ND's, mics, etc.

[@omeryonis5493]

If you compare images like that, you might have hard time even telling the difference between iPhone 12 camera quality with Gmaster

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! Thanx for the comment. It’s hard to show the difference through a KZbin video. Maybe you can suggest some other way of showing the difference. I’ll be glad to hear some ideas :)

[@kunapicture]

Nice brother✌

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! thanx for stopping by :)

[@omeryonis5493]

This video is made to make broke people feel good about f4

[@MartinNemeth]

I would disagree. If you’re broke, even the f4 is expensive. Can you spot a significant image quality difference between them? My point in this video is, that if you don’t need better low light performance, you are good to go with the f4 because you would not sacrifice the overall image quality with the f4. Then you can invest that $1000 to some other gear.

[@prs26]

Save even more and get Tamron 70-180 2.8

[@MartinNemeth]

I should test that lens too. I don't have any experiences with Tamron lenses. :(

[@andrewthaking1]

What’s your thoughts ? I may look at that one

[@prs26]

@@andrewthaking1 Tamron is beating G Master or on par.. with new drive motor tech and compactness

[@varshachaudhari6719]

Thanks for help

[@MartinNemeth]

You're wellcome :)

[@atyl1972]

Music is wayyy too loud dude

[@nicolasgonzalezv]

Muchas gracias! Saludos de Wallmapu

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx for stopping by :)

[@gotchie1591]

man, that annoying background sound, your voice is low volume, then the background sound is so loud if you are wearing a headphone, damn RIP ear drum.

[@MartinNemeth]

I should be more careful about that next time. Thanx for feedback. I was testing it on my AKG closed headphones and the levels were ok,

[@wisdomboi4602]

@@MartinNemeth I concur, great video, only the music was a bit too loud

[@MartinNemeth]

Thanx for stopping by and for the comment :). Unfortunately there is no possibility of just replacing the video file without deleting the video (as far as I know).

[@galaxystars6409]

Why u shoot them both at f4 lol

[@MartinNemeth]

Hey! thanx for the comment / question. I wanted to test them out side by side. The G OSS cannot go below F4 so I wanted to know if there is any significant difference in the image quality between the G OSS and GM under the same conditions. Of course the F2.8 will have more shallow depth of field and better low light performance, but that was not my point here. My point here is, that the GM is a lot more expensive and there is not much of a difference in the image quality, when comparing those lenses under same conditions. So if you don't need better low light, you can save $1000 and invest that in something else, like ND filters, better camera body, other lens, etc. Of course I'm not saying that the GM is bad and if you have unlimited budget, go for it. However some people might think that there is "night and day" difference between the G OSS and GM and will buy the GM because of that.

[@galaxystars6409]

@@MartinNemeth ohh okay that makes scene and whats the point in the 2.8 if you can't use oss with it... lul

[@galaxystars6409]

@@MartinNemeth nice video anyway, just didn't understand that one part lmao

[@dhillonvideoniagarafalls]

Nice

[@Kinadnuf]

really annoying, unnecessary background music to an otherwise helpful video.

[@MartinNemeth]

My bad. Unfortunately i just cannot update the version of the video without loosing views and comments. :/ Sorry.

[@MChronicler]

You look like a discount Peter Mckinnon

[@billzidis2656]

Kinda rude but funny :P

[@MartinNemeth]

I guess I will take it as a compliment. I cannot be like him since I have more than 5M subs less than him

[@billzidis2656]

@@MartinNemeth I personally prefer watching this channel. All the big ones are only advertising at this point

[@MartinNemeth]

@@billzidis2656 Yeah, you can be sure, I have 0 brand deals at this point :). I know what you mean. Some vids look like they are made only to promote a product or service. In some cases I do not mind, because they still provides me with entertainment or inspiration :). And to be honest, I would also like to make such brand oriented videos from time to time.

[@niduabridal4222]

Oh god this backround music is killing me. I didnt understand anything because of this stupid music. This video would get triple traffic without any music in the backround. oh my god. I stop the video right in the beginnin and writing this comment. Dude you put a lot of effort for this video but you should understand. You simply stop your viewers to watch you own video by using a wrong music. Try something different. Use piano or guitar only.

[@MartinNemeth]

I know about that issue. I should have set it quieter. The irony is, that this video gained me the most views and subscribers :P. Other videos are better when it comes to music and sound mixing. My bad. :(

[@MartinNemeth]

What is your fav telephoto lens for your Sony camera?

[@Dan.gibson.photographer]

Martin Nemeth the 70-200gm 😉

[@MartinNemeth]

Great lens in deed! It could be more affordable however :)

[@Dan.gibson.photographer]

Martin Nemeth for sure, the other options the new 135mmf1.8 GM

[@MartinNemeth]

I like the GM line very much, even though I recommend the F4 version (which is still a great lens). I am shooting my short film next week and I am going to use the 24-70 F2.8 Gmaster. Also a great lens. I am planning a review video for it too. :)

[@hahahaha-m4o]

24mmGM

[@BrookviewLabs]

Image guality😂