Sony G 200-600mm f5.6-6.3 - Long Term Lens Review

[@trishmccallister]

Your videos have been immensely helpful! And your calm nature is much more enjoyable to watch than a lot of the other photography KZbinrs.

[@richinlukang7042]

I coupled the Sony 200-600 with the 2x teleconverter so I could capture the annular eclipse (ring eclipse,) in Taiwan, this past spring. It worked amazingly well. I almost have no other use for this lens, here in Taiwan, because there are very few places where a super-zoom lens comes in handy, but I have found uses. I've used this lens to capture a nesting pair of doves and their eggs out on my balcony. I'd set up my camera just inside the door to my balcony and they were nested just outside the minimum focus range. Other things I've used this lens for, I take pictures of the people on the streets below my 4th floor apartment. At night, by street light, I can almost clearly capture the people sitting outside the restaurant about 200 meters away. The photos are clear enough that I can read the big print on the labels of their beer bottles and I can catch the glow of the cherry on a lit cigarette. Also, I've taken some unique "macro" photos of spiders when trying to get a real macro photo was out of the question. Tropical spiders can be a bit scary if you try to get too close and a super-zoom eliminates the need to get close.

[@gudkarma4life]

Thank you Shane -very honest , most informative, practical ,unbiased and simply articulated review. Thank you for your time.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

No problem, thanks for watching! I'm happy my points came across clearly, I spend a long time editing these reviews 😅

[@badosu]

Awesome review Shane. I appreciate your expertise and the way you build the video. You have an appealing voice that is very easy to listen to and I am now a subscriber. Keep them coming.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks Bruce! I put a lot of time into these so I really appreciate your kind words 😊

[@JessDemant]

Great review! My Holy Trinity of Sony lenses is the 12-24mm.f.4 and 24-105mm.f.4 plus the 200-600mm.f.4.5-6.3, and I love them all :)

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you! That's a fun lens kit, must be absolutely stellar for hikes and travel

[@nguyenhoangvu9609]

I do the same like you but the mid range i feel better with 55mm 1.8 and 90mm macro:)

[@jglezpr]

Really liked the review. Extremely clear, easy to understand. Thank you!!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Glad it was helpful :)

[@adamhoranyi7595]

I was wondering if anybody even compares this lens to the sigma and tamron 100-400. And you do ! Great rewiew with fine details💯

[@gideonjeromeraj]

Awesome video Shane! Everything I just wanted to know. Thanks for this.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you, glad it was helpful!

[@niccolofoscarini8266]

Great video as usual. You deserve way more followers!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you! 🤞 One day

[@shanehirschi9943]

Totally agree!! Your approach and delivery create a very welcoming and educational atmosphere. Keep on Keeping On!!

[@stevearita3267]

Hi, just found your channel and subscribed. Really enjoyed your review of the 200-600, I think your the first and only reviewer that described how to really use the lens, that is, use the 200 to spot your target and then zoom in - seems simple, but something that isn't always obvious. Also, given the design of the zoom ring mechanism, a quick quarter turn zooms all the way to 600, which makes the above use and description of spotting and zooming even more helpful. Also, appreciate your honest thoughts in regards to who this lens is for, again, it seems intuitive and obvious a lens of this type is for wildlife, sports type of shots...but reminding viewers of this is always welcomed and in my mind only goes to show how honest and credible you are when talking about a lens of this size. Thanks again...and look forward to checking out all your other videos.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you 😊 I tried to keep this review as grounded as possible as it's not a very familiar lens for many photographers. Your kind words really go a long way and I appreciate it a tonne. I hope you have a fantastic day and all the best with your photography!

[@northernperspectives]

Thanks for another honest and humble review Shane. Great job!

[@pweston1970]

Great video - very helpful and honest review, thank you.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks! Glad it was helpful!

[@sushichef40]

Thank you! Awesome review dude. Excellent format

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Much appreciated!

[@tingtong0998]

Thank you so much for such an informative and educational clip. It’s also so easy and relaxing listening. Keep up the good work and please keep it coming. I am new to photography and you have been a great help. Be well.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you very much :)

[@moondancedude]

Well done, i appreciate the insights. I’m planning to match the zoom lens with the Sony A6700 soon.

[@horstkugel9419]

Thank you, Shane. Awesome review. Your video addressed all of the concerns I had with respect to this lens.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you! I'm happy it was helpful, sometimes i feel like I am talking about stuff no one really wants to hear

[@horstkugel9419]

@@ShaneBethlehem Different folks have different information needs. Some (folks) just won't read, or listen, beyond the proverbial "executive summary." Your video was to the point. From my perspective, you have spent a significant amount of your time to provide information to me I would otherwise have had to research from multiple sources. Again, your video is much appreciated.

[@PhillipGuyton]

Mine will be in tomorrow! I'm very excited. This is a excellent review and answers a lot about it ! thank you!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks Philip! I hope you have a blast using it today!

[@ThomasStreiff]

Beautiful bird shots! Thanks for your video. I just switched to Sony and bought the lens, I can't wait to try it out soon!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you very much! You'll have a blast with this ones I think 😊

[@Rei_n1]

Excellent photo material, excellent review. You deserve much higher recognition on youtube. Keep on making great content and followers will come!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you 😊

[@justinqian990]

like the way you present. good job!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you 😊

[@getkedar1]

You earned a sub mate!! i enjoy your videos. Keep it coming and thank you.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks for the sub! will do!

[@garynelson4485]

Great review! I love this lens for both my A9 and A7Riv. It's currently my most used lens.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I bet the AF is absolutely fantastic with those cameras!

[@gr1224]

Great review. Can you please share the details of that camera bag. I’m about to buy this one and I also have the 70-200 with Sony 7riii

[@penfex]

Great in-depth, easy to follow review - thanks :)

[@ShaneBethlehem]

No problem, thanks for the feedback and for watching! Hope you have a great day 😊

[@isaacj9799]

Great review. I'm looking for zooms on the Sony platform. Also would be great to see you compare which zooms you prefer and why? Also a review on the new sigma 100-400.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I've been debating picking that one's up actually! I'm working on a video talking about my opinion on certain zoom lenses in the future, but it's only at the scripting stage right now so it's a little ways off 😅

[@thomasevans1128]

Thanks so much for this review! It’s full of facts and really useful!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you for watching, I'm glad I was able to convey some good info ☺️

[@guillermobecher2848]

The video is great, I congratulate you, a query, the autofocus scene, at minute 9:17, is it done with the 7rIII or the 7III?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you! The autofocus is actually on the a6600, I should have mentioned that in the video, I was trying to put it through a stress test how it performed with the newer autofocus algorithms

[@jamaleldinkhaled9649]

This is one if the best video presentation I ever whatcha it this month,I was looking for an me who give me this more information but you did it , thanx a lot appreciate what you doing,it’s really like you this video take month to be like that 🥰🥰super pretty and awesome

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you 😊 I like taking time with making reviews when I can

[@uglyigor3055]

great review. Very calm and neutral. Thank you for this video. It helped me alot making my decision.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you very much, calm and collected is what I aim for! I'm glad to hear the video was helpful

[@edc641]

This is the voice I want to fall asleep to. Great review, thank you!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

ha thank you 😅

[@marclabro]

great video. sigma 150-600mm sport has come since that video. very interesting to see you used peak design on foot and on side of the lens and attach t your neck; i was wondering if possible. which bag do you use ? I'd like to start bird photography with a7rv. I am very afraid about weight and size of 200-600. Do you think that sony 100-400 allows to walk in forest and zoo and take good pictures ? does 100-400 external zoom has same problems for dust and water than old sigma ? do you think using a 1.5 crop on a7rv with 21Mpx would make a good 600mm from a 100-400mm without using a TC 1.4x ?

[@FranchiseBuyer]

Thanks for the great vid Shane. Same, bought this lens mostly for fun in shooting sports, and cool moon shots 😁. Don’t regret the spend one bit, even though is not in high use!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks for watching! this is by far the lens I have the most fun with Still not practical for any of my paid work, though one day I'll convince a client they need a 600mm shot 😅

[@FranchiseBuyer]

@@ShaneBethlehem 😂 We tried in vain at an expo recently to be all creative with it for a long distance stage composition video shot for a speaker - ah, bad idea We will find a way 🤦‍♂️😬😬

[@digo2829]

Great review Shane! Thanks for sharing!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks for watching!

[@JoseMatutina1964]

I never used a UV filter for lens protection. A lens hood that saved me a couple of times is enough.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I'm the same way, when I first started I used them semi often but so many lenses these days have coated front elements that they easier to clean than UV filters are 🤷

[@darrinyo-mamakimble7002]

I’ve got a friend at a Big Box Store they don’t get “bonuses” aka Commissions unless they sell a UV with the lens. There money grabs.

[@TLK22]

I religiously purchased a filter with all my lenses until I went to Nepal and had fog between the filter and the lens. I had to carry a useless filter on my trek, so never again lol!

[@SiebSonic]

Amazing video, thanks for the info! What camera strap do you use? The one with the red things

[@ShaneBethlehem]

No problem thank you for watching, I actually made a video on them, it's the peak design camera straps, I use the slide light most of the time these days.

[@SiebSonic]

Thanks for your reply, I forgot to delete my question. I found the video and ordered one yesterday! I'm pretty excited 😁🙌🏻

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Oh that's awesome, I hope you love it they're great straps

[@tchlin]

I found a used near mint version of this lens with a roland pro lens coat and a kirk foot for 1600 two weeks ago. Feels like I got a great deal! Great review!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Oh wow that is a great deal, thanks for watching and I hope you are enjoying the lens

[@PhardonMedia]

Very good and deep review. Thanks.

[@luispaxtor2680]

Indeed, it is a very fun lens to use. Very happy with this lens. Good AF & IQ. Perfect for wildlife photos.

[@EpitomePax]

Do you think one would miss having the reach of 600mm with a 100-400?

[@luispaxtor2680]

@@EpitomePax Yes I think so, that is a 200 mm difference.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

functionally that's like cropping into a different sensor size so it's a relatively large difference when you're in a situation where you need it, like wildlife or sports you'll notice it but for anything else usually you can just get closer or get away with cropping.

[@EpitomePax]

@@ShaneBethlehem good to know! I have the A7RIV & really like the idea of the 200-600, but it being 2X the size & weight & price as the sigma DN 100-400, I don’t think it’ll even fit in my 31L bag 😂. And by putting it in crop mode I can still get 600mm reach on the 400....

[@lpinto1251]

Thank you for your frank views on the special use that this lens should be bought for.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Glad it was helpful!

[@curiousart42]

Awesome video. Are you able to use the hood with a filter attached? Sorry to ask this, if you already covered this in the video - I clicked on it and liked the bot I saw just before bed. I'll watch in it's entirety tomorrow. Thanks again.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Hi there no worries, I forgot if I spoke about it in the video. Unfortunately though it has no hole or sliding door similar to that of what is found on the G master lenses, putting filters on here is a significant effort

[@curiousart42]

@@ShaneBethlehem Thanks!

[@shahzebnasir4692]

Great video as always!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Glad you enjoyed! :)

[@phildisberry2531]

Thank you Shane! I agree with Suresh, Very honest & unbiased review. I use the this lens with my Sony a6600.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you very much 😊

[@pvattoly]

Super cool review. Impressed with the details. New subscriber for your channel . 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks for the sub! I had a lot of fun making this video :)

[@neokwlx]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Your images look amazing and it's great being excited about your hobbies especially in these times! I'm still on the fence about getting this considering I have the 70-200 as my longest lens but haven't been able to make the decision to get an upgraded body (a9,a7r4), this 200-600, a 100-400, or a teleconverter with an a7r2 and a7iii body. Do you think the first upgrade for birding/wildlife would be with this lens or other options first?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

No problem, thank you for watching! the situation you're in sounds exactly like the same one I was in when I was purchasing this lens, realistically you can't really go wrong with getting a lens and then If you find the camera body you're using is limiting, getting a new camera body down the road. The lens isn't going to be updated anytime soon but the camera bodies will be replaced almost yearly by a newer version. no matter which way you cut it though it's still a tough choice, the a7riv is a dope camera

[@jdonn2678]

First upgrade should be your body, to the a9 if you want to pair the 200-600 seriously. I'd sell the R2 and 7iii to fund your build. Then buy a 1.4x tc, have the 70-200gm, 200-600mm and a A9 and call it done.

[@drummingspain207]

@@jdonn2678 I have the A9 and 70-200 2.8 - it's such a wonderful combo and I love using it. The image quality is outstanding!

[@philipgowdy]

Another spot on video..I have the Sigma 100-400 and its incredible for the price..

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you! I have yet to try one but I'm constantly hearing great things about it!

[@riverhe2852]

Great review. What do u think of this compared to 100-400 GM with X 1.5 adapter？

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I have no personal experience with using the teleconverter yet but I've heard mixed things about it, the biggest thing is you do give up a bit of sharpness when at 600 millimeters while using the teleconverter on the 100-400 and that the autofocus performance isn't as consistent as it is on the 200-600. overall though you're getting a way more versatile kit when using the teleconverter with the 100-400 which is smaller and lighter. personally if I didn't already need to have a 70- 200mm lens in my kit I would have opted for getting a 100-400mm lens And have tried the teleconverter, but it entirely depends on what your needs are.

[@RJ-wy6cx]

Have this set up with the a9 Mark II it's absolutely awesome You're right it's pin sharp

[@AliKazi]

Would you recommend this lent to someone shooting video - sports games.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

This lens would be great for shooting video of sports if you have a solid tripod with a tripod head that is relatively smooth like a gimbal head or a fluid head. It also depends on the sport you're shooting, for sports like football, baseball or cricket this would work great, but for indoor sports or more fast-paced close quarters sports this would be hard to use because it's just a little too zoomed in still at 200

[@AliKazi]

@@ShaneBethlehem yes outdoor Cricket mailing. So I am a little unsure to go for the 100-400 or 200-600. The Sony 100 to 400 is ridiculously priced at £2,299. Thus, I will have to go with the new Tamron 100-400 at £899.

[@AliKazi]

@@ShaneBethlehem for the tripod set up I was really happy with what I've bought. Recently got a ifootage TC7 tripod and an Manfrotto 504 video head

[@HarryTanHorolographer]

I used to shoot with Canon 5D3 or 7D2 with EF100-400mm and EF400mm f4 DO2 primarily for birding and zoo photography. When I got this lens matched to A7R3, it blew me away in usability and quality of the images. Now planning to get rid of my Canon equipment.

[@darrinyo-mamakimble7002]

Great Vid! As always. Thanks

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Glad you enjoyed, it thanks for watching 😊

[@fanwu3650]

You live in Oakville? Nice to see some local guy on KZbin.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Good eye 😅 I live in Burlington I shoot kinda all over the place here though, mainly in Hamilton

[@corybaker13]

Hi Shane , have you used extension tubes on this lens for subjects that are closer to you? Do you know much about that?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I made a video about extension tubes explaining the math some what, but with longer focal lengths you start running into diminishing returns rather quickly unfortunately, and I have tried it for fun, it’s not a fun experience

[@karthikvali2420]

Great review indeed. Can I use f5.6 on my A7RII? What is f5.6 to f6.3?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you :) it is a variable aperture zoom, I made a video recently on the topic and this link is to the part of the video where I talk about it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXzYqmtjfd-rkJo

[@bc5474]

Looking at this lens for rodeo shoots and show shots of a production I’m involved in. And also pictures of the Great Smoky Mountains which is my backyard. I know you mentioned sports photography, do you think that would transfer to what I’m wanting to use it for? Thanks!!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I think this lens would do fantastic for rodeo shooting, I'm not sure how large of a space are in though so it might just be a little too long at 200mm would be my only concern. I find a lot of photos for mountains though also benefit from a focal length smaller than 200mm at least for my personal preference however you definitely can get some really nice photos with this lens with some interesting perspectives

[@philiphansson7671]

Great review. Got a review planned for the Sigma 100-400?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I would love to one day if I get the opportunity, but as of now I don't have any plans in the near future.

[@G3N13music]

Would one of the Teleconverters work on my Sony FE 70-200mm F/4.0G OSS ?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Hmm I don't know unfortunately I'm sorry 😟

[@eraheem]

Nice review. For a hybrid shooting with video as the primary use, what do you think of 200-600 with the new A7S III?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you, that's a good question that I don't quite have the answer to, I'm sure that the 200-600 will perform well and it certainly sharp enough to resolve for 4K, but how the stabilisation and the improved rolling shutter effects the video output will be entirely dependant on how good the camera actually is, regardless I'm excited to try them out together

[@eraheem]

Thanks for your thoughts. I also thought about 100-400 instead thinking of the stability issue with the longer lens. Perhaps for nature documentary the 100-400 GM would be a better one.

[@TheNr08]

Good video! Can you recommend getting the 200-600 for a6400? Would it be silly or would it work out just fine?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I've used this lens with my a6600 and it performs well, but it's a little bit a goofy/unwieldy setup. So like, it works but is a very niche setup for super telephoto stuff

[@MomentousGaming]

Great review! Was that the 20L or 30L Everyday Backpack I saw? I have the 20L and was wondering if the lens would fit!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks! It's the 20L v1, and it just just fits 👍 but like, no lens hood or camera

[@MomentousGaming]

@@ShaneBethlehem Perfect, thanks!

[@MannyG32968]

I've got the 200-600mm and it's exactly as Shane's description... to the tee!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you very much 😊

[@BucNas7y]

As a landscape shooter this is far from useless for landscapes. It's bloody fantastic. The compression factor its quite amazing.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

That is fair, the compression can get really unique perspectives otherwise impossible to get. with other focal lengths. Though personally for landscapes I find the practicality of a telephoto lens tapers off at >400mm, atmosphere becomes far to much of an issue with image quality (I touch on this at 6:30 ish in the video) I feel a 70-200 or 100-400 makes more sense for landscape photos rather than the class of lens this is in. That's just my opinion though for if I am recommending lenses to people, if this lens works for you that's sweet!

[@philipgowdy]

Great Vid showing both sides of buying such a long telephoto lens. I had the Sigma 100-400 and for the price the image quality is Stella but I am still getting the Sony as that extra 200mm for Wildlife Birds is very necessary. There are also no plans for Sigma to make a teleconverter for it..I got this info from Sigma. One other major point is the internal zoom on the sony doesnt pump dust onto your sensor like the 100-400mm by either manufacturers. Regards Stay safe.

[@mosessparks8340]

Great review, thanks.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thanks for watching!

[@pradiptapd]

After seeing your review and some others, I picked up this lens last month. I am currently limited to birds at my backyard feeder and am impressed with its reach over the 70-200 which is also a great lens. I have the A73 body amd deffered the upgrade to A74. I am now considering an appropriate ball head considering the heft of the lens. I am not too keen on a gimbal. Any guidance will be greatly appreciated. BTW, I too live in the GTA in Mississauga!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I would actually steer clear of a ball head with this lens, I have had poor experiences with them and actually preferred using a fluid head when I could. The big con with that strategy is that it is so hard to carry a hefty video fluid head around, so I've been trying out a very niche solution: www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B08RJ9FXZJ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 I'm still working on reviewing it but I have enjoyed it so far for long hikes as its much more granular in its controls, but it suffers also because its friction based rather than being spring loaded like a fluid head normally is, and you also need a tripod with a bowl head to level it. If you do go the route of a ball head I would just aim for a larger sized one as you'll have more control. Ultimately, I am still working on deciding what I think is the best solution too 😅

[@EnigMagnum]

best 70-200 or similar focal range lens for sony apsc??? any recommendations?

[@kingweddingmedia]

Go for either the 70-200mm f4 G lens or the 70-350mm f4.5-6.3 G lens. Both are excellent lenses on aps-c. The 70-200 would also be useful on full frame if you ever upgrade, will be better in more challenging light, and slightly better bokeh. The 70-350mm is not as good in lower light and has a stiffer zoom ring, but has the much better range and is lighter and cheaper. I own both and if I had to give one up I don't know which one I'd sell as they both serve a purpose for me. Both are excellent lenses in terms of sharpness and optical quality.

[@EnigMagnum]

@@kingweddingmedia thanks... how is the tamron 70-180 on apsc?

[@kingweddingmedia]

@@EnigMagnum I ended up selling it - I love the tamron zooms but that one didn’t feel as fun to use. The zoom was quite stiff and I didn’t like the extending barrel. Also, having no IS in the lens means you have to bump the shutter up quite a lot to ensure sharpness, but it was an excellent lens in terms of optical quality, I just didn’t find it fun to use.

[@EnigMagnum]

@@kingweddingmedia ok.. thank you..

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I'm a little late to the party, but i agree with the everything Simon said. I think the Tamron is a fantastic value and it looks like they may be also making a APSc long zoom option after their last to APSc lenses have been well received, however my experiences with tamron lenses has always been a bit of a let down, the lenses sony put out just handle better and I prefer their image profiles in general

[@tysonchan4358]

Do you store it away in a drybox? My current drybox is very small for this

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I don't deal with a tonne of heat/humidity where I live in canada so I do not have a drybox, I just keep it in on my shelf out of direct sunlight

[@jimcrowdell7466]

I have both the Sony100-400 and the 200-600. Although you mention the dire MFD of the 200-600 you failed to mention the excellent MFD of 0.98m on the 100-400. This for me makes it a more versatile lens when on a nature walk I.e. Ok for birds (especially with the 1.4 TC) and also great for butterflies and insects.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Totally true! For most people who are looking at these two lenses that I think that's a very important fact, because most of us are interested in wildlife. Funny story, I was silly and I had that in the original cut of the video but I end up getting rid of it as I thought I was going going too deep 🙃

[@thilinaalagiyawanna3680]

Thank you

[@Itrepreneur]

I love the review

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Thank you very much!

[@denischasse3567]

Hé merci beaucoup mon ami très intéressant 🎥🎥🎥

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Mille mercis!

[@georgemahlum6542]

A pair of auto extension tubes can often solve the close focus needs of most folks using the FE 200-600/5.6-6.3 lens...one can also use the older FE 70-200/4 for close focus work...Also I and many others do not like external protruding telephoto zooms i.e. (sony FE 100-400/4)...Dirt...moisture... and damage when protruded because of...tree limbs...plus...falling down..etc. By the way... the FE 200-600/5.6-6.3 lens is great for concerts...crowds...street..air shows...wildlife...boats...even apartment living...etc...Cheers

[@arkadiusznowak]

Hi, I use this lens mainly for sport photography (football). I take a break with players because I can't feel my hand after half of game... this lens is heavy as hell!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Even after half an hour of use I feel the same, I always try and use a tripod as much as I can as heavy lifting isn't my forte 😅

[@1946gsp]

Would the 200-600 work in a stadium at night?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

It certainly can, but it's not the easiest environment for any lens as your subjects tend to be moving rather quickly you'll need to us an elevated shutter speed which will also require a higher ISO to compensate. Personally I haven't taken my lens to any sporting events so I can't speak from personal experience but I know other people have used this lens with success. So ultimately yes, it's a good option, and the only lenses better in this class are like 10k so they aren't really at all in the same class 😅

[@1946gsp]

@@ShaneBethlehem thanks so much for your reply. I shoot HS sports with a 22 year old 300/2.8 Canon L. Time for a change...

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Oh np, lol well thats a sick lens, but you'll be blown away by the AF on this zoom, it handles like a dream

[@superman8458]

Thank you brother

[@ShaneBethlehem]

thank you for watching!

[@francisjun]

does it overheat though?

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Apparently the lens is white to prevent that 🤔 Maybe the canon r5 should be white too

[@ggreyshade]

so i have a7r3, and i was considering the 150-600 from sigma to use with my mc-11 for a while, but i think im going to go with the 200-600 instead based on the fact that sony + sony works better, and internal zoom + weather sealing. i also have considered the sigma fe 100-400, but what detracts me from that is less reach in the extreme, and i have a sigma art 135 1.8 which has such good image quality, it fulfills the around 100-200mm focal length i wouldnt have going with the 200-600. and the sony i believe will hold value better and longer.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

When I got started with the A7R3 used the MC-11 For quite a while as well, after I moved over to native Sony lenses I was impressed by the huge increase in performance. it's a tough call because the difference between 400/600mm is pretty big, but the size difference between the two lenses is also extremely significant. for myself a smaller lens would be nicer just to be able to have something to take with me more often because the size would be less inhibitive, however, I did end up going with the 200-600.

[@migueltrujillo5932]

Maybe Sony meet us in the middle with a 200-400 f/4 GM for Three Papers US. Thank you this is also a lens to look if I decide in a Sony body.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Hopefully, they seem to be focusing on fleshing out their lineup considerably now that they have the basics. I suspect they will sooner come out with some telephoto primes though before putting out a mid-range zoom again

[@lapinuage]

lucky Shane ! :D i dram to get this lens but i cain't never carry the weight i wish someday the human being create a lens lighter with the same config =)

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Hopefully! I think it may just be a limitation of the focal length though 😅 they are inevitably heavy

[@lapinuage]

@@ShaneBethlehem sadly hehe and actually no one is purest than glass to use i'll reflect about to create something with mini helium ballons to hang on lol

[@ESCLOROPENDOLA]

the sony a7r4 and the sony 200-600 and in several years that I have been taking photos, a bird in flight has hardly ever focused clearly on me. I sent my entire team to sony Spain on 3 occasions and they told me Everything is ok. Even now I sold the sony 200-600 and bought another new 200-600 and it always fails in bursts. .I think that this camera and this lens are never compatible in burst photos with moving objects and animals. My approximate configuration is: ISO 800 speed 1/1600 or more f10 always because in f6.3 the static or moving photos come out very little sharp I don't know why central focus with tracking which is the last option on the menu. 60mpx extra sharp +5

[@beasleyfinds]

Good video

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Glad you enjoyed! Thanks :)

[@curiousart42]

This lena is currently on sale, $100 off. Hopefully someone is able to take advantage of this sale before it ends.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

That is a sweet deal!

[@markrigg6623]

Best not to add uv filters just for protection. Reduces image quality. The supplied lens hood if used affords all the protection that's needed.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Totally agreed, though some people still want that additional sense of security no matter what

[@BuildingCenter]

Shane has perfectly encapsulated why I do not need this lens right now . . . or probably ever. Watch my Gear Acquisition Syndrome dominate my Adorama account, though.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Ha yeah this lens is certainly not for everyone, I barely even need, it but it sure is fun to have!

[@AllCarsUnited]

Damn getting this. Also reminds me of how absurd my sigma 105 1.4 is. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ShaneBethlehem]

It definitely is not a lens for everybody

[@joshwhitee]

Soo funny! I shot a timelapse from sam lawrence park at almost the same angle with the same lens!

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Lol it's a nice spot eh! Lately is been pretty nice a clear for viewing Toronto

[@r.8514]

👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

[@ramnayak2209]

Who cares about edges when everyone love portraits

[@ShaneBethlehem]

🤔 I wouldn't necessarily get this as a portrait lens, though it can get the job done

[@abelfernandez5648]

Tengo esta lente junto con la sony A9 desde octubre del 2019 y tan solo puedo decir que se muestra como un tanden increible para fotografía de naturaleza. La calidad de imagen es fantástica y la velocidad de enfoque igualmente. En cuanto al precio no me parece tan caro como pueda parecer. En España se puede comprar incluso por bastante menos de 2000€, 1700€. Muy recomendable.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Sounds like I should move to Spain, that is some great pricing! Thank you very much for your comment, I hope you have a great day!

[@Designsecrets]

I'm finding this review weird......you keep on saying it's not a x lens or it's not a y lens.......it's a zoom lens....ie it can't do macro shots....obviously if you're going to use it as a long distance lens (which is what it is), you aren't interested in street photography or macro shots.....so yes it is a very specific type of lens, and should be reviewed as being so.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

I re-used the phrase too often, my apologies. I was trying my best to convey such, hopefully I can do so in future videos in a more straight forward way.

[@Designsecrets]

@@ShaneBethlehem I liked your review and how you split up each section and explained your thoughts / opinions. I'm looking at the 200-600mm lens at the moment, as it's a focal length I don't have at the moment.

[@migueltrujillo5932]

What's with the impersonation of Tom Petty? I go watch the video now thank you.

[@ShaneBethlehem]

Do I sound like him 😅

[@migueltrujillo5932]

@@ShaneBethlehem in your dreams :=)

[@Twothenines]

Yeah, the Sigma 100-400 is packed right full of disappointment.

[@olegm9736]

Sigma 150-600mm is unfortunately really shit. Sony G 200-600mm have perfect quality shots, perfect stabilizer, perfect autofocus. I would not recommend buying Sigma! If you make videos, you can buy Sigma, cuz in this case probably you don't need ideal quality.

[@trevorvonritter]

canadian

[@Jerry23555]

Gift me the lens

[@ShaneBethlehem]

ha, I don't plan on giving this lens away anytime soon 😅

[@Jerry23555]

I knw d value of d lens

[@AustinPetDetective]

Your voice puts me to sleep ?