Sovereign Citizens #18 David Rodriguez

[@LawTalkWithMike]

"You are violating us dude" 😂😂😂

[@jdranetz]

He'll say that when he's in prison one night.

[@dunelander-PC]

Hey Mike. Apparently Dewitt was booked into prison yesterday.

[@tomgraves6463]

No dude, we are tiny *violin-ing* you.

[@misty5979]

😂😂😂😂

[@csh43166]

😂🤡😂

[@acuyra]

I wonder if the ‘You work for me!’ line has ever worked on a cop, ever.

[@DozensOfViewers]

They should respond by saying, “You don’t pay my salary. The city steals your money and uses it to pay me. That’s not you paying me.” What are they going to do, disagree? That’s a central tenet of their faith.

[@acuyra]

@@caliindoor In what respect does it work? Does it get you out of ticket? Does it get them to leave you alone? Does it do anything but make you look like a jackass?

[@RobRoss]

@@caliindoor It’s not in fact a fact. The police do not work for you. You are not their legal employer. You do not pay their bills nor their equipment. Now, you may be able to say a thing or two about it as a taxpayer, but first you’d have to prove you actually pay taxes. I want to see your tax return. Because one thing I’ve learned about sovtards from watching youtube is that they lie like a fish swims. So you have no credibility and need to prove every statement you make before I will believe you.

[@acuyra]

@@caliindoor My name is clearly displayed. Can you not read?

[@craigcallan8002]

@@caliindoor The obvious response is: “If I work for you, you need to give me f’in raise, because I have to deal with jerks like you!”,

[@ChasKahler]

As a taxpayer, I am appalled at the lack of use of tasers. What am I paying taxes for?

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@Bakerstreetgaming]

Mace and attack fur rockets

[@ChasKahler]

@@Bakerstreetgaming I've never heard of attack fur rockets, but they sound great.

[@Bakerstreetgaming]

@@ChasKahler K-9 units lol

[@LawTalkWithMike]

They are 🐶🐶😂

[@darthbubba866]

If David thinks he's being violated now, wait until he's in prison...

[@janecridland1469]

Taser ......Taser .....Please...... Can you imagine the screams in stereo from these two! 😂😂😂

[@New_Wave_Nancy]

"It's OUR building." Um, these officers are also citizens who also pay taxes. It's their building as well.

[@1HippieChick]

Thank you! I came to point that out but you just said it for me. Plus I would bet those two probably couldn't pay for the cop's shoelaces! Some of these clowns are bragging about how much money they make doing that nonsense, but I wonder how much of that they report to the IRS? Hmhm...

[@1HippieChick]

I would like to see their tax returns....

[@mikegracie3212]

Im guessing that they would show no taxable income and if true that would refute their argument that "I pay your salary".

[@noahsarknancy]

Mike are there not provisions in the US and state constitutions for policies and rules and orders?

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Well yes I’m the sense that it provides for a legislative branch.

[@surfmanfish]

"You're violating us, dude!" Yup. That's David all right. It's like he has a soundboard that has "dude", "how do you sleep at night?", and "I'm a peaceful man" figuring prominently on it.

[@normanpearson8753]

I don;t know why the cops (?) talked to them for more than 2 minutes . If the judge says jump ,you ask how high .

[@dunelander-PC]

At 6.43 he says something about being there doing what he’s paid to do…. so, he’s obviously there to harass and cause a scene to make money from. This harassment of public officials for profit is beyond ridiculous.

[@Gamer88334]

Yeah. These people really need to stop. If they want to play journalist, they can follow every rule that real journalists have to follow. Meaning they’d get permission to record inside public buildings sometime before going to those buildings instead of just showing up and recording, avoid harassing people, avoid recording people who don’t want to be recorded (it’s not illegal, but a professional journalist will avoid recording people who tell them they don’t want to be recorded), avoid recording other people’s children (even if it’s not illegal, you still shouldn’t do it. At least not without blurring the faces of the children), they’d read ALL of Poster 7 instead of just the part that benefits their narrative, and they’d avoid acting unprofessional. If they don’t want to do that, they shouldn’t even think about pretending to be journalists. Unfortunately, I think all of that requires a certain amount of maturity that they don’t have. Of course, they’re free to prove me wrong about their maturity being too low. If someone’s gonna play journalist, I’m gonna hold them to the same standards I hold real journalists to.

[@allisonjames2923]

He’s being paid to “assist” a client - which means he’s accepting money to provide legal services which is illegal since he’s no lawyer

[@Gamer88334]

@@caliindoor Provide me with evidence to prove that I’m wrong. Also, the Frauditors in this video were very immature.

[@dutchbeef8920]

He’s not travelling he’s operating under a commercial licence, he needs to put the plates on his car then

[@skwak3041]

@@Gamer88334 Looks like Cali Indoor decided to do the sovereign disappearing act! 😂 That’s a common occurrence when you ask them if they have any proof their legal mumbo jumbo has ever worked. 😂

[@philo5227]

Jesus, it's like dealing with little children. Deputy: "You need to move, you're blocking the door". Sovtwit: "I'm not blocking the door, you're blocking the door" I know you are, but what am I? I'm rubber, you're glue - bounces off me and sticks to you. NANNY NANNY BOO BOO!

[@tamasmarcuis4455]

English is my fourth language and even I know the difference between Personal Servant and Public Servant.

[@ronfullerton3162]

You probably have language skills better than half our population!

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yup

[@petesmitt]

@@ronfullerton3162 not to mention IQ score..

[@ronfullerton3162]

@@petesmitt Well, since you brought that up, I guess that all I can do is agree!

[@christopherconard2831]

"You are a servant! Don't forget that!" She's gone from Karen to Victorian era Matron talking to the staff.

[@Caseytify]

"Two! Two! Two jerks in one!"

[@earthrise3672]

It sounds like him, but it's hard to tell. The Deputy said that there was an order from the judge, and seems like it was specific to them.

[@katmandu573]

When I was in school (way back), disruptive students were temporarily banned from attending class. Education is every child's right but socially acceptable behaviors must be practiced. Why can't these idiots get that? For the guards to remember them and seek to allow only one to enter tells me they were quite disruptive, enough to warrant preventive measures via judicial order. I think once the reason behind this battle is known, we will be slapping our foreheads from the stupidity. Arguments between this couple must be magic.

[@ronfullerton3162]

There is something more that we have not been told about. And as you said, it must be good.

[@mchume65]

Why do they always think a supervisor will say something different?

[@skip3778]

That is definitely her.. Her use of the words 'youse' and 'dood' tells me so.

[@kcindc5539]

You can always tell which one is David’s, uh, “lady”, as she routinely addresses people as “Youse” as in this oh-so-eloquent assertion of pure fantasy: “Youse guys work for us”

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yes 😂😂😂

[@1HippieChick]

Total TRASH!

[@mattymaple1976]

I left the upper midwest about 7y ago and I still catch muhself saying "youse guys" far too often

[@cygnustsp]

@@mattymaple1976 i say it all the time to be funny... doesn't always work

[@mattymaple1976]

@@cygnustsp try using a Harry Caray voice. It makes it funnier. Also say "bud-why-zerzss" instead of Budweiser.

[@jonathansim678]

This is a fascinating journey to follow. These sovcits are most entertaining. Thanks again Mike and love to the boys!

[@ladymopar2024]

I agree without even trying we are learning stuff everyday I also agree love to the puppy dogs

[@mircat28]

They are not entertaining any more after several hundred videos and a couple years. They are just a waste of time. They ALL sound the same, say the same thing and follow the exact same script. Some of them are better at memorizing the script than others. But it's all the same BS.

[@elhurricane1706]

When the judge issues an order SPECIFIC to you, and the deputies know you by sight...you may have taken a wrong turn somewhere in life.

[@elhurricane1706]

I am a bit surprised at how much you're throwing support behind them. Hearings are public, sure, but when you have people like them, they're not there to do anything but disrupt the court and cause issues.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Agreed but giving the government too much authority is also a bad idea.

[@elhurricane1706]

@@LawTalkWithMike not going to disagree with you, but in this case...the government has to protect the rest of the public from these guys. I find it justified. He danced on a tow truck; what's to say he won't disrupt the court?

[@petesmitt]

@@LawTalkWithMike That's why we have separation of powers. www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers-an-overview.aspx

[@jasa_TheRealOne]

This is definitely David, I recognize they're voices anywhere. They perfectly fit the definition of insanity. They just keep doing the same stupid stuff over and over and over again

[@kendalldad]

100% that's David's wife. I know, I've had nightmares of that voice. We need legislation making that voice illegal 🤣

[@boomer2095]

Great video as usual. As an attorney you must see it all the time where a plaintiff is allowed to go off on a rant and tries to justify their position to either the judge or a police officer who politely listens and acknowledges what they are saying without acknowledging that they agree, only that they heard what they were saying. The un indoctrinated person to the legal system takes this as a sign that the person is agreeing to their justification and therefore acquiesces to their argument. They just don’t understand wrong is wrong.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yup

[@awalton9024]

"You work for us. This building belongs to us." Well then, I guess this is what you call irony.

[@aporlarepublica]

Soon, David Rodríguez will be trying to enter that same place with a fake moustache and an oversized Mexican sombrero.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@SimonJM]

Curious that the officer was saying that only one of them could enter, so is that directed at them in particular or the populace as a whole, for social distancing reasons? I'd not like to presume but I was kind of gently assuming that the officer wanted to have a general idea of why, where and what would they be getting up to - such as 'going in to pay a fine/ticket' which would be a legit reason, as would 'going to observe a case'. Whereas, 'going to make an absolute tool of myself' would not really be a good enough reason to pass!

[@unquietriot8019]

I thought the bailiff/security guy said the judge had given instructions that they couldn't both come inside together because they had already made complete tools of themselves and the court wasn't having any more of it. That's especially funny because you know you've made your idiot mark in life when you get yourself trespassed from a courthouse for being an unrepentant dickhole.

[@lescook9021]

Notice that no other people were stopped or questioned as they were going in the court. So it was, as LE said, directed at them personally at the order of a judge. My favorite part, We are protecting people from you

[@ronfullerton3162]

We know how these two act, and how they believe everything is about them. I am sure that they have disrupted court big time to be bared this big time from court. Something is up here that we do not know about.

[@Pattsnogle23]

That is ABSOLUTELY David and his girlfriend. I can hear those two punks from a mile away! Just throw them in jail! 🤦‍♂️

[@texastargetman8165]

When they start that “this building belongs to us” stuff, they should clarify that they own AN EQUAL SHARE of the building with every other member of the public. If they interfere with other’s rights, they lose part of theirs. It’s the same basic argument that saysn”since my tax dollars helped build this road, I should be able to drive at any speed or do whatever I want while on it”

[@ladymopar2024]

We need P Barnes and his taser

[@masteroverincompetents7915]

That is indeed the domestic partner of the Incompetent known as David Rodriguez.

[@rcheetahcheeta27]

But if he was going to his own proceedings I am sure the cops would make HIM wait and then escort HIM to and from HIS proceeding(s). SHE could only go in if SHE was a witness and same thing: escort in, testify, and out. That is the onky proper solution.

[@slres8716]

This couple personifies "Doing the same thing but expecting different results." You really can make a comedy movie with this couple alone. So, who do you think could play the role of David James Rodriguez? Who could play his "better" half?

[@LawTalkWithMike]

🤔 good question

[@abrooks8154]

[David pulls a drawing from his pocket, clearly finger-painted by David himself. He straightens the folds and proudly shows it to the officers] "Look here, public servant. You see this picture? It's SpongeBob SquarePants. Do you know who SpongeBob SquarePants is?? He basically runs Bikini Bottom. He is like, super smart and knows all kinds of rules and stuff. Do you see what he's saying here? Look at the word bubble. He's saying 'Statutes are not laws'. See? He knows the truth. You're lucky Mr. SquarePants isn't here right now because he would be ashamed of your behavior."

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@willystuff]

I'm willing to say "they lack the ability to remain silent!!!!!!!!!!!!"

[@PipsKay]

I wish just once, these guards of the court, or police would say, when these absolute NUTS say oh you work for me, you're my servant BS I wish that the court people and police would just once say: um, news flash, I pay taxes too

[@1stltwife]

This building belongs to us! What are they the king and queen? They are so ignorant! If the judge says I am not playing, the judge is the boss! Do these people consider this their profession? The condescending " you work for us" crap..please! I just want to smack them. Petulant provocateur on parade! Keep up the great work ! You are the voice for the sane people! ( I think?🤩😜😛🤪

[@priscillaastling8707]

David loves the lime light. Should have gone into acting. Maybe he did and didn’t succeed.

[@richardvinsen2385]

He’s a meth-ed actor.

[@brianshoman1723]

@@richardvinsen2385 🤣🤣🤣

[@billclarke770]

Likely the judge ordered that they be denied access unless there for some reason that the judge articulated. So they are asked why they want to go in, in case it is for such a purpose. Obviously Security won't tell them the exceptions (because they could then lie and pick one of the exceptions as their reason.) So, Security asks.

[@thelatinist5024]

I think the officers should’ve just repeated, “by the judge’s orders, only one of you may enter,” no matter what the sovereigns said or asked, and watch them go nuts with frustration.

[@alicia.8857]

It appears these 2 have a history at that courthouse. If the administrative/chief judge issued an order, until further notice, the deputies have to enforce the order. Despite the usual sovcit word salad, they never disclosed why they were there.

[@cybelemarie7913]

Is this Mr. 'Parkour! Parkour!' on the tow truck?

[@sinchico3362]

LMAO, hello to the pups 🤗

[@stox5988]

When someone has a vast number of misdemeanors, they should be equal to a felony. When I lived.in Brooklyn, I remember reading about people that had 20-30 misdemeanors. That is just ridiculous!

[@deleteclawz4266]

last time i went digging on the dock I struck water....

[@RoadPirateFilms]

Nice one, Mike 👍

[@rifelaw]

I think there should be an alternative version of each of these in which "sovereign citizen" is replace with "male prostitute" a la Dan Aykroyd's SNL sketch from 40-odd years ago.

[@eamonhunt8781]

His followers were put in another room and had to watch remotely, because of their behavior. This aggressive behavior is their solution to everything, of course people have to respond with measures to curtail their childish aggression.

[@cxidp]

If I were as angry as the Rodriguezes and didn't care about good manners fear of arrest would prevent me from behaving this way. I have trouble understanding why they weren't arrested. They were endangering others by interfering with the work of the deputies.

[@SteinerSE]

"Feel free to charge me, the judge that ordered me to stop you is the one that will judge my case" :)

[@probablynotmyname8521]

The judiciary, at least in my jurisdiction, have made it very clear that they will decide how the courts are to be run. As such judges can do pretty much anything they want, they are literally the lords of their domains and they answer to virtually no one. You dont have a right to enter a courtroom but judges know that its better for justice if courtrooms are open (but they are usually empty unless the case is high profile). Essentially there is an open invite to go into the court that can be revoked on a whim.

[@hythekent]

It’s the same same problem. Security guards were told these two are barred. But the guards are uncertain about how to deal with it.

[@mikegracie3212]

Better training is in order

[@stefanlaskowski6660]

@@mikegracie3212 Clearer instructions were in order. The failure was on the order givers' part.

[@barackmycat9448]

Mike`s thoughts make more sense than these two crybabies.

[@OldSeer]

A judge's order has power. I sprained my ankle during jury duty. The Judge checked it, observed the swelling, and ordered the court officers to carry me to the Jurors area. "Under no circumstances, is Ms.Shields to attempt to walk. Am I understood? She was. When we got on the elevator, I assured them That they could put me down. (They were HUGE.) No ma'am. Not worth our jobs. So yes, judges orders are as serious as a heart attack.

[@OldSeer]

@@Blasted2Oblivion It was a stupid on my part .I was sitting half cross legged on the bench. I lack basis grace and balance, and when I tried to switch legs, I pulled the hell out of my ankle .Day that ends in y for the physically awkward.

[@chriscroumbie-brown6914]

If she is talking like Jar Jar it's a bit of a give away - this sounds like his Cheer squad - She could speak in a full, rational (kind of) sentence - That being said - the employment laws of most countries do not allow you to talk to your employee in that manner without repercussions

[@james4582]

They are Professional Court Disrupters.

[@cygnustsp]

SHOW ME THE LAW lol. Almost as good as DON'T TOUCH ME

[@GaylordBuzzard]

I've been trying to keep a list of all the times things got better for the frauditors when the supervisor arrived. Nothing yet.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yup that is going to be a short one.😂

[@geoffreylegard2468]

I’m a little late to this party but David is in Santa Clara County for this video. He’s originally from San Jose, the County Seat of Santa Clara County. Frankly, Santa Cruz County can have him. Luckily I left that god-awful area years ago.

[@tink1964]

I love all the people going in the door behind the officers 😹

[@bigs1546]

Mike, @6:36 you hear loud-mouth say "Client - that's what we get paid to do". Sounds like they are going in to try and be 'counsel' for someone and the Chief Judge is having none of their sov-cit BS screamed in his courtrooms by two wannabe layers. That is what I am getting from this. Also they need to be careful, her trying to push through, with her body up against the officer, is exactly the same as what is in court as assault against an officer up in Michigan [check out Lavender2's Moo Cow series].

[@LawTalkWithMike]

👍

[@firmestshrimp710]

Hi this is lead sales associate Casey Schofield comin to you FROM Johnson City, TN as usual.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Love it!!!

[@viandengalacticspaceyards5135]

The original sovereign citizen was likely Louis the 16th of France; an actual sovereign suddenly turned citizen by an unfortunate revolution. Like his modern followers,he argued at his trial that the court had no authority over him,and just like their modern counterparts,the judges disagreed,and he lost his case (and head). Learning from it seems to take a long time.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Interesting take👍

[@darkphase7799]

I am not from America. Legit until I saw this video I thought that it was mister meaner not misdemeanor lol. I always thought "Why the hell do they call it that?" Lol.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@markharrisllb]

He says he has a client and this is what they are paid to do. If you are charging for legal services aren't you breaking the laws in America? Do you have the principle of 'in camera' in America? Under certain circumstances in England, such as protecting a child, testimony that could put a witness in danger and some whistle blowing cases a judge can hear a case, or part of a case, in camera denying public access.

[@naustin4881]

He's almost enough for an entire channel.

[@jakeeschen7868]

On August 4 Rodriguez had a Faretta motion, in which a criminal defendant argues he should be allowed to represent himself. I don't see the outcome. On August 6, he filed a document seeking judicial notice of a bill of particulars. No, it doesn't make sense. That courthouse is not in Santa Cruz, and those are not Santa Cruz deputies. Their patch looks like Santa Clara.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Thank you that makes sense

[@grouchydropbear3981]

Why don't they conduct a citizen's arrest?...........Or do they know the basic elements of a citizen's arrest?

[@calvinlimgo]

Whenever they say you're a servant, the police should answer, yes i am but I'm not your slave, you may think I'm not serving you but I'm serving the public

[@johntrevy1]

Mike are you in IL? Are you familiar with Ryan Alton who calls himself "Sovereign Citizen" or "Ryan Esquire"?

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Oh yes I have done videos on him

[@mircat28]

Chicago is in Illinois.

[@KShea11]

Deliciously awful. Thanks Mike!

[@csh43166]

Really, David, we're just fine without you looking out for us - really. I'm pretty sure my IQ is twice yours, and that I can handle it myself if I feel my rights are being violated. Thanks, just the same. 🙄 That woman is a real condescending b**ch - she just makes me angry. Glad you're having fun with your videos, Mike - and letting us go along for the ride!! 😁 💕🐶🐶💕

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Thank You Connie 😘

[@ejagger]

How many times has the "you work for me!" crap worked in getting out of a traffic ticket? ZERO. Mental cases.

[@MelanaC]

In the UK to get past the security check point you have to answer questions by security. Well certainly here in Scotland. I had to drop some papers off and I was asked questions - just basic like ‘what is your business in the courthouse today?’ While I was waiting for my turn at the desk, a few other people were also asked the exact same question. Answers ranged from ‘I have a court appearance, I want to attend a court, I would like to enter the public gallery etc. In the uk we have terrorism laws that mean YES the court officials, i.e. security, can and do ask what your business is. They aren’t asking for names or medical history!! I believe if you want to enter the public gallery you must give a name and phone number - this is for fire safety in the event of an evacuation of the building…

[@celticcdlblues3819]

Actually unless that officer can give them a stature court order from the judge with a signature on it or a filing that says he or her are not allowed to come in they actually are breaking the law. Since it's open to the public and it's open to the public. Especially the way that he's stating it only one or the other can come in.

[@christina5kids16grands]

Ever heard the term, "don't shoot the messenger"? That applies here.

[@tdsil]

Where is P. Barnes when you need him?

[@ebredenberg]

These are like when I watch car builds on other channels. Fascinating and I love it!

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Thank You

[@robfive2555]

Good update Mike... Thanks ...

[@robertstogsdill1024]

The Public make terrible bosses.

[@RationallySkeptical]

11:13 The governor here in WVa literally had an official "Do It for Babydog" campaign except that was to encourage vaccinations. And yes, our governor's dog's name is.... Babydog. **sigh**

[@LawTalkWithMike]

🤦‍♂️

[@HappyHoboRecovery]

Thanks Buddy. I always like it when my lawyer friends use those expensive data bases to fill in the gaps. L.L.Bean to the Chicago Bean 🦉🌲🦞🍸⚓👍

[@TheUkester69]

Yo, Mike, have you seen the video of David and his Lady Friend being denied access to a supermarket for failing to wear masks? The dizzy Lady Friend takes center stage on that one.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

No 🤦‍♂️

[@jamesplymire5342]

If they don't wanna answer questions, they can leave. If they don't have business to handle, they do not need to enter. Abuse of Rights goes both ways.

[@Iamrightyouarewrong]

I watch court proceedings during my lunch break all the time with no problem,... Of course though, I'm not a prick.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

So there is that😂

[@alfranken3752]

Here is a thought for you. How about the fact that this is not the first encounter that the bailiffs have had with these two characters. Isn't it obvious to you that of all the people going into the courthouse the two bailiffs single them out and specifically them that the Judge doesn't want them in the courthouse? Only those two characters. So, indeed the question is indeed valid to be asked as to their reason for being there. They are making sure that they are not keeping either one of them from a court date. No court date. No entry.

[@debrastarr8436]

Or maybe if the said they wanted to observe a hearing (or whatever else) without divulging personal information, they’d have been admitted. Unless there are covid/delta precautions being observed due to the recent spikes in cases.

[@marigold3687]

When these folks bring officer’s defending their oath, officers need to tell them they are defending from all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC.

[@earlinenunn6013]

Thanks for educating me on this topic. Really enjoy LTWM.

[@lewstherin9464]

Do these people not have anything better to do but go to court?

[@jen5714]

With Covid a lot of places are limiting the numbers of people allowed in the building. The arrogance from this pair saying this is our building makes me what to slap them. I doubt they even pay taxes at all. If they don’t have a court date they don’t need to be there doing their crap with a camera.

[@marycarter6134]

His harpy wife isn't going to make any points by referring to these men as servants. Public servant does not translate to public slave and these guys don't have to put up with that attitude. Also, the building they work in belongs to them too, not just to her and her idiot husband.

[@texastargetman8165]

I thought any Judge can ban cameras from their courtroom.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yup

[@petesmitt]

A judge has full control over a court like a captain has full control of a ship or airplane.

[@cgaskill13]

It sounds as if they’re experiencing consequences for their actions.

[@piva1358]

Did he say "client" ? "We have to go do what we are paid to do?" WAS trying to help another person ? That world have been a reason for being excluded? 🤔

[@skycloudtraveler7786]

Thanks for the crazy. These people are so crazy.

[@martinfisher1484]

Check for longer period and you find a few more...

[@pennkeuka]

Courthouses are kind of interesting. The law is the chief judge. He/she is responsible for the safety of the occupants, so whatever rules he makes supercedes just about everything. Like for instance, you want some public records which is your right by state law, but if you won't go through the security in front, you can't get them.

[@Javiercastillo-tw4ce]

These police need more training on handlimg this people….

[@WhiteHatH4x0r]

Ideally, you don’t want to tase a driver when the vehicle is in drive. They could easily have a muscle spasm, floor the accelerator & take off with no control… no bueno. Also I hope they picked up the stop stick!

[@mikegracie3212]

The deputies should have told them that they had an order from the court and if they continued to try and violate the order arrested them

[@nancya5876]

Thank God you stopped the “semi-serious” channel. What fun would that be? Thank you for all the entertainment Mike! Another channel hosted the P. Barnes award of the year. You could start a “most cringeworthy voice award.” This woman would be in the top 5. 😂