Soviet Cruisers: How to Play

[@WorldofWarshipsOfficialChannel]

What do you think about today's video? Which new Soviet Cruisers did you manage to get in previous Update?:)

[@oillipheist]

I liked it!

[@stephencarbis8978]

What a joke World of Warships you don't have a favourite lol

[@StaK_1980]

Didn't get any apart from the Mikoyan because the drop rate was atrocious and the progress was set in stone. Furthermore these ships are utter BS and shouldn't have been added to the game. There, happy?

[@premthanathip7166]

Feaiw faw coconut grasses

[@stephencarbis8978]

the new German Battleship didn't get anything. small guns small health pool and normal secondaries the can't need anything. unless you build into them. the Americans have better secondary. So my question is World of Warships where are you going? what are you doing? you're making a game that is becoming boring all you do is sit back in spam. all have big guns that shoot long distances.

[@spookyserge5964]

What do you mean, “how to play?” This is russian ships! Built of glorious stalinium, no one can penetrate!!! Just charge and make motherland proud!!!

[@davidandmartinealbon3155]

And send capitalist pigs to gulag!

[@spookyserge5964]

david and martine albon they won’t survive

[@stevemc01]

Lol. I like capital a bit better. New York sends broadsiders to gulag for Stalin on US’s behalf.

[@theheavytonk928]

Montana: Ima give you citadels/penetrations every 30 seconds

[@Ruffwayjay10x]

💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💯

[@Leanginc]

*russian bias intensifies* Waiting for yeet fleet IV

[@shinki5361]

Lmfao

[@fakulm1436]

I was thinking the same xD

[@jamespridemore8709]

Balans! Historically the Soviets were known for their excellent radar in WW2.

[@capt.eddyhim9254]

You missed something. It is *long FUCKING range* radar. Even longer range than that if the US and UK : D

[@p.j7992]

Actually it is called fukin stealth radar

[@SomewhatSummarized]

And their impenetrable battleships

[@ComradeHellas]

It's a video game, lots of ships here were prototypes, it sacrifices "historical accuracy" for versality and entertainment.

[@maxoberg4642]

@@ComradeHellas not very entertaining to fight a russian ship nose in

[@Hugothester]

1-Go forward 2- Fire big guns 3- Be immortal thanks to stalinium 4- Profit

[@juicemeister1984]

Thank you comrade. This will help me when i grind soviet cruisers later

[@rudrakshmishra2761]

@@juicemeister1984 does not apply to tallinn lulz

[@deadlyapollo]

Soviet navy: does nothing in WW1&2 Soviet Navy in game: destroys everything

[@grimmshredsanguinus2915]

i heard even the great jack sparrow met the great soviet fleet back in 1786

[@fartnutssupreme4930]

Kinda the same with the German navy with the exception of their u-boats. They both just weren’t really navy powers.

[@1190-3-t]

@@fartnutssupreme4930 The Imperial German Navy in World War 1? Not a naval power?

[@cultofpersonality2002]

@@1190-3-t my Canoe could have beat them

[@morty8304]

1:09. "Another famous Soviet ship, Stalingrad". Cmon WG. You can't rewrite history. Even if you try. Say it like it is. "Another paper ship, Stalingrad".

[@omerfarukcetinkaya5943]

@@adalbert1972 dear Wojtek you're not playing WoW already??

[@niklasso]

I simply love it that Petropavlovsk with 220mm guns has almost the same pen as Bismarck with her 380mm but hey, I forgot that the Soviet Navy had all these powerful ships.

[@Choukai_Chan]

That joke made my day lmao

[@soarinskies1105]

Imagine actually complaining about the kool aid induced myth of Russian Bias

[@XHitsugaX]

@@soarinskies1105 there are some parts of russian bias, because after all the biggest player group is still in Russia so they have somehow to cater to it and its ok. (See Stalingrad, 12km Radar). However outside of Stalingrad and Kuznetsov who honestly needs to be nerfed since his special effect activates on low HP and not on an achievement you have to earn. Kuznetsov paried with Stalin, Petro, Kronstadt, Kremlin is just way too good. But youre right, people meme so much about russian bias they forget that ships like: Bourgogne exists which is one of the best t10 BBs, people forget about Des Moines which is still the best heavy cruiser in the god damn game if you think about it. Russians literally call it DEMON because its such a good ship. Best tech tree t10 cruiser for sure. Conqueror with his insane HE slinging damage, zombieheal and stealth paired with cunningham makes him broken as FUCK. People forget about Alaska which is just a Tier 9.5 Ship. People forget about Kitakaze which is in a tier of its own. People forget about shit like Thunderer which is probably the strongest t10 coal ship that came out (Smolensk doesnt count, its annoying and antifun but Thunderer is stronger). Massachusets is the best t8 BB hands down and blows even Vladivostok and Lenin way out of the water. Georgia is a gimmicky broken ship at t9 which does better than probably all t9 tech tree BBs. Daring, Jutland, Lightning Cossack are all insanely strong DDs especially Daring. Benham is an american DD that has a torpedo reload compared to a BB salvo reload.

[@Disruptuer]

XHitsugaX that’s nice that every nation has a couple of good ships while the entire Russian lines are all good. That’s the problem. Not to mention Alaska costs 70+ dollars or tons of Free XP and Bourgogne is a steel ship that people will only get AFTER Stalingrad. And DM is strong but it’s balanced. There’s no reason to touch that ship but then they introduce a ship with 220’s with more or less the same pen as the Bismarck with 380’s but yeah, just Russian bias complaints.

[@theheavytonk928]

@@XHitsugaX Where’s Montana though....

[@SomewhatSummarized]

“Their accuracy isn’t very good” **proceeds to hit two citadels in a row**

[@ME262MKI]

Typical WG excuse, like in WOT

[@grimmshredsanguinus2915]

Indeed isnt very good usually u devastate ships with stalin LUL

[@LuckDragonProxies]

As someone who owns the ship it sucks. 4k ap hits on broadsides and low HE damage and chances to set fires. Trust me. It's not even up to Krispy Kreme horrid standards

[@marvelous5038]

Cameron Belrose naw u just don’t know how to play the ship

[@alfredomariasammartino7728]

Yea, doesnt the petro have a sigma rating of 2.65 or something? (For any1 wondering, if I remember correctly, Yamato has a sigma of 2.01)

[@TheTh903]

Damn, forgot how powerful the Soviet fleet was during WW2, so powerful i guess that all naval history books didn't want to include them. I guess like countries like Japan and the United States just couldn't compete.

[@mrdunk2955]

Historians tried to hide it from us, but thank god War Gaming has our back providing us with real~ pff I cant... 🤣🤣

[@grimmshredsanguinus2915]

dont forget they surpassed british fleets before WW2

[@leroiarouf1142]

In 1905 japan killed the russian navy

[@theheavytonk928]

Unfortunately with all the powerful Soviet stuff, *they went bankrupt after world war 2*

[@jasonsu6214]

WeeGee is just russian bias

[@TheDedictvi]

*casually citadels Musashi at the range of 11 kilometers*

[@AH-pq7yw]

Do you think that staying alive at 11 km is easy thing to do??

[@TheDedictvi]

@@AH-pq7yw With 50 mm icebreaker, deck armor and 56k healthpool? Yes.

[@AH-pq7yw]

@@TheDedictvi try then get Petropavlovsk, no other ship, always finish at top. But dont babycry when you are at shell rain. Btw dont blame your teammates when you die. Thats all morons do when they die

[@TheDedictvi]

​@@AH-pq7yw Yeah no shit Sherlock. Every ship will die under focus fire and I can't believe someone is actually defending this ship. It's horribly broken and if you need some evidence compare it to any other non-soviet TX heavy cruiser.

[@kaikurohasegawa7275]

@@AH-pq7yw quite easy with surface concealment barely over 11.5km, ability to stealth radar, an icebreaker nose and pretty damn fast, i see no problem getting close to Musashi unless that Musashi stay at the back of the map like CV do

[@stephencarbis8978]

Yippee another overpowered Russian ship!!!!!! wish the Germans got the same treatment!!!!

[@uryen921]

Wargaming, you are nerfing the entire dd line, there are already too much radar ships, not to mention the German CV is coming...

[@benji5540]

Same opinion. They are nerfing DDs to the ground without anyone clearly “seeing” it . And for the new AP rockets... poor Tashkents and Harugumo... such large targets...

[@Xavagery]

DDs deserve the pain they get

[@AH-pq7yw]

What nerf are you talking about? Actually all DDs are gonna get super buff as their air detectibility will be halved

[@soarinskies1105]

Bruh are you actually brain dead, the German cv’s can’t do shit to destroyers they have ap rockets remember?

[@Disruptuer]

German CVs are good for destroyers, that’s the most balanced once’s against them

[@madkoala2130]

You remove stealth radar from woster then add it back to soviet ships.... Gg wargaming with your russian bias.

[@swiniatv3556]

Russian corporation, russian bias.

[@eruno_]

It's Belarusian, not Russian company

[@sussy9278]

There's nothing wrong about them adding more russain ships smh

[@k.b.4057]

When you take away RN CAs' slightly improved auto-bounce angles because they were "overperforming" just to give every possible AP oriented gimmick to glorious Soviet CA. Nice move, WG.

[@Abed1984]

Welcome to Russian Bias, Comrades! ☭

[@aquila3958]

220mm guns, yeah more like 406mm in disguise, another bunch of bs soviet paper ships...

[@Bambusz00]

How to play: just use your braindead stealth radar every time, the enemy dd won't escape, use your stalinium ap to every target in every range, because it will citadel everything, and you can even broadside in close range, because the enemy will get only overpens. You can long range snipe too, because you have laser bullets, so it is dead easy to hit everything in any range, and your 50mm plating will protect you from every bb. You have decent aa too, so don't worry about cvs... Your welcome

[@AH-pq7yw]

Your braindead radar lasts only 15 sec, let's to be honest here no one can slaughter DD within 15 sec (you can only shoot twice maximum). all enemy DD needs to do is retreat and come back within 15 sec. And overpenning Petro at broadside? I dont think you have over 1k battles in WOWS

[@Bambusz00]

@@AH-pq7yw i have more then 9k battle, and 55% winrate... So you say that a stealth radar is ok? No counterplay guaranteed dmg to dd? And i've alredy played against petro a few times and just like kremlin: most broadside shoots overpen or bounce. Sure you can citadel them but it's hard. Now go to your wargaming boss, you can tell him that you defended the undefendable fact that these new blueprint ships are just fckin op and noone wanted them.

[@Disruptuer]

Bambusz00 it’s a shorter radar duration for that reason you can get two salvos off while your teammates might get one, it’s not the radar that’s incredibly strong on this ship it’s everything else. It’s people who complain about these ships but buy them on release is why WG won’t ever listen to feedback.

[@Bambusz00]

@@matiscouillard1618 The worst thing is that a dd player can't counterplay a steath radar... Normally you see a DM or a Moskva, and you turn around and you won't be radared. But now you can't do anything, you will get radared, your position will be revealed, and you will get damage. It is soo much fun... At least if you see a rocket plane you can still prepare for it and try to get closer to an aa ship, but you can't prepare for a stealth radar. That's why it's braindead

[@h3llotherefellas]

balans.exe stopped working

[@estoyaqui5386]

cos you wrote it wrong. it´s BALANS

[@h3llotherefellas]

@@estoyaqui5386 I'm so sorry.

[@divide12903]

No debil, balans.exe reeealy startet working our blyatiful spreedsheat said they would be perfectly fine with their 406mm guns in disguise, uuuhhhh i mean 220mm guns

[@KnodsilMemeMaker]

Arent all of these capable of stealth radaring? Ugh....Y tho?

[@federkraecker9759]

I think WG stated somewhere these cruisers need good concealment to get into closer ranges and stealth radar is a side effect. But Thunderer gets good concealment while being a sniping ship and i won't even start with GK. I heard that from Flamuu's stream some time ago and i agree that these ships are simply overpowered. There's no denying that.

[@curiousentertainment3008]

The game doesn’t need these ships.

[@SomewhatSummarized]

Yes

[@estoyaqui5386]

I am all for more free ships, but yes, this addition is questionable.

[@mrdunk2955]

The glorious spread sheet will say otherwise

[@theheavytonk928]

The game needs these ships, after all, BB overpopulation. What the game urgently needs, is [in distorted voice] *paint the American warships’ deck correctly because gray just sucks*

[@adpop750]

"Soviet cruisers Tallinn, Riga, and Petropavlovsk are now available for all players to research" NO THEY ARE NOT. They become available in 9.6.0, which is tomorrow for everyone on EU, where the most of your players are. Is it so hard to write accurate news?

[@hiszkia2597]

the future is now, old man

[@AH-pq7yw]

Why you are so toxic?

[@carson5066]

They're available in 0.9.6 yes, but NA and SEA get them today. That's about half of the playerbase. Chill out buddy. Also, is it so hard to spell properly?

[@jaapbeuk9095]

@@carson5066 That's not half the player base, the playerbase on EU is more than twice as big as NA and SEA together. Besides that it's certainly not "all players". Ps. what's up your Pavlov spelling response, there not a single word spelled wrong buddy.

[@carson5066]

@@jaapbeuk9095 EU doesn't have "twice as big" of a playerbase as NA and SEA combined, it's actually smaller than both combined, but you're right, NA and SEA are not 1/2 of the playerbase numbers-wise. But NA and SEA represent half of the playerbase geography wise. But whatever. Also notice how he edited his comment? He had multiple misspellings. For example, his "where" was spelled as "were." I'm not usually the grammar police online, but if he's gonna be toxic for no reason, he might as well spell stuff correctly. Just a minor issue, so I gave him a little flippant rhetorical question.

[@gonotgone1]

I'm just here to see the same 2 guys get really angry at comments about Russian bias

[@blueflames6961]

*literally no weaknesses*

[@cringe_lord5762]

I have an idea, remove the British bb super healing and add it to Soviet ship, there happy now?

[@grimmshredsanguinus2915]

@@matiscouillard1618 u forgot a gun reload consumable for not having 30secs of waiting to blap somebody

[@davidandmartinealbon3155]

@@grimmshredsanguinus2915 yes, give them a buffed version of Jean Bart's reload booster, but it lasts 5 minutes, has a 15 second cooldown and has unlimited charges

[@theheavytonk928]

@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Why 15 second cooldown? Make it last for only 1:12 minutes but it has a 5 second cooldown, and unlimited charges. Happy now?

[@ren-yn7sn]

Okay okay cool I get it but.. What are their downside? Not having 20KM shimakaze torps? Not having RN BN superheal?

[@jasonsu6214]

they have lousy concealment and are big

[@Fackeldackel]

@@jasonsu6214 Lousy concealment? The Petro? Big? The Petro?

[@KimoFest]

A ship with a braindead playstyle and mechanics, just like the soviets in the war.

[@Lebdjev]

And they end up beating Germany amazing right ? Yeah, yeah probably, because they had a good RNG. :=

[@MickR0sco]

@@Lebdjev because they had millions of brain dead cannon fodder pretty much

[@Lebdjev]

@Meimme Wolf Most of them were just civilian... And i don't think talk about a conflict, like the american did with the vietnam war body count is a good idea for beginning.

[@Lebdjev]

@Meimme Wolf Please stop talk non sense civilians are not soldiers, or maybe you don't know what a conscript is. :/

[@Lebdjev]

@Meimme Wolf So if you understand civilian are not soldier, why are you talking about them like soldier ? And change the tied of war, like it was destiny for germany to win ?

[@Starkillerscat]

Famous Ship Stalingrad Yes, because it wasn't only somewhere on a napkin

[@sussy9278]

Why would you care?Smh no one cares

[@Starkillerscat]

@@sussy9278 I know at least a dozen who are bothered by this more than I am

[@alexandrechen3081]

Don't believe me? Who wouldn't believe you when it comes to OP USSR ships

[@hdjdgshs4368]

Soviet cruiser are not paper ships 🤣

[@shinki5361]

These never existed even on blueprints, so they are completely fake ships

[@sussy9278]

No one cares players will still use it

[@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014]

Moskva: “There’s someone in my branch occupying my spot at my tier, and it’s not me!😡”

[@davidandmartinealbon3155]

What about Kirov? Same thing happened to her at tier 5

[@theheavytonk928]

Both Kotovsky and Nevsky really suck. Nevsky only has 8 guns, at tier 10. I’d rather put Donskoi there in tier 10 and then Sverdlov class cruiser on tier 9. On Kotovsky, nah its fine

[@ImRandomDude]

What we have in game is AA useless, make AA defenses actually work

[@sussy9278]

Well they shoot so they work right? Smh get a life

[@rollsross8570]

Wargaming: "World of Warships, the thinking man's action game!" Also Wargaming: *Makes ships specifically made to suit people who are unable to think*

[@Hproawesome]

I never know soviet has lots of ship in ww2.

[@ntf5211]

they had about 270 ships. Most of them were small cruisers and destroyers. Also torpedo boats and submarines. Big ships were not common in the soviet navy

[@neonlight1214]

I would call these ships better than Stalingrad because lower citadel, lower ship profile, better rate of fire, stealth radar and 360 degree guns. With same AP shell efficiency. Only downside is the weak accuracy at 13km+ but it can still do 1-2 citadels so it is contradicting what WG is saying. 200k DMG will be your average in this petropavlovsk. Ruining both BBs and DDs lives. Oh well who cares about gameplay when you are greedy and selfish, wargaming?

[@jph-asmr9906]

What about the ability to stealth radar?

[@FirstLast-zv5od]

Video: *kicking absolute ass* Me in reality: *dies instantly*

[@r9dng289]

Asking Wows to become historically accurate Day 2

[@SaiIor_Moon]

Buff California WG, she's uhhh, 1/4 Russian, yeah, that's it! Now go buff her or you ummm, go to Gulag!

[@andreipoplauschi180]

Do you even realize what 1/4 russian means!!! They will most likely nerf her ruther by 0.1 sec but to make it more balanced give her nuclear warheads, on another note kremlin gets 1000mm Railguns

[@ramiel7666]

Pew Pew HE from max distance, if you get closer than 15 km, you get citadeled by anything from any angle....there, a short version of How to Play.

[@dinjoe828]

More Stalinium, yes pls. With this fake shit, I'll have all 5 T10 Soviet Cruisers that's more that all other nation. Historically accurate navy sizes comrade.

[@jasonshen7600]

Just you wait until Yuro makes a video about soviet cruisers and make this irrelevant.

[@r9dng289]

Asking Wows to become historically accurate Day 2

[@arvinzacastillo4410]

Next is Soviet Aircraft Carrier

[@ericd2926]

Russian owned company. What else do you expect? Haven't yet seen an OP American ship/tank in World of Warships, Tanks. Funny how America and our allies won both WW1 & WW2, yet the game does not reflect it.

[@HMSPrinceofWales]

Dear WG, you allways want people to believe your "historic accuracy". The London Naval Treaty defines a "Light Cruiser" a ship with a main armament of up to 155mm. Everything above is a "Heavy Cruiser". (Besides the obligatory: These were never even close to existing comment.)

[@tomlin9539]

Don't worry, I believe you, especailly after see the ship citadel a tier 10 battleship at 12Km range. Now I know what's gonna happen if you give Stalingrad crusier level reload, battlecrusier level armor, and 360 degree turret.

[@김범수-j4j]

The Soviet Union is the worst country in the world! May the Lord vader protect me...

[@salvoballarino6583]

Non vedo l'ora di ricercarle.

[@ya7ioo]

Am I the only one who noticed they spelt Tallinn wrong in the Armada screen thing?

[@nathanly3980]

it made sense to remove Moskva from the light cruiser branch, but there was really no need for a heavy cruiser split

[@fockewulf9518]

Project BALANS

[@Uncle-rdr2]

After 4 years these 3 are still my favorite cruiser’s

[@Yuki_Ika7]

i hate that many of these feel like the Zao but better, Zao needs a buff to hp at least. Also soviet bias

[@Nolsen]

I'm really confused, update 9.6.0 isn't out yet

[@thevoin8389]

On na it is, on eu it will be tomorrow.

[@julianmonakian]

Nothing more satifiying that one shot one of this fckers with My Yamato

[@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014]

2:27 *Laughs in Des Moines and Salem*

[@TB-ModelRR]

Stalinium - In Russia, armor penetrate you! 😅

[@WordingtonComment]

petro is literally bismarck in cruiser disguise

[@apleb7605]

1:29 Their secret is their Stalinium armor.

[@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014]

I’ll take Petropavlovsk over Moskva since Pet has better AA, citadel protection, and sits lower in the water.

[@gimpsgonewild]

due to this clear RUSSIAN BIAS, they now need to buff US, UK and Japan ships and even need to give both DD lines of Japan Heals and speed boosts. 100mm guns with IFHE cant damage the new Russian ships, only set fires, which even seems to be harder now. WG devs out of control

[@asrer579]

These are paper ships. They would have had many problems in construction considering the Soviets didnt put much emphasize on their navy plus they didnt have enough resources to build such ships, instead they put resources into the Red Army. Shame on you WG. Not just the Western Player Base but even the Russian Player Base doesnt care about paper ships (in WoT Russian Players only appreciated REAL Soviet Tanks). This is poor gameplay decision at best.

[@samarthraizada]

decent armor? No, sir, at least Talinn does not. Not to say that Matchmaking has given me braindead matches in that ship where my team cant consistently last 10 minutes: that's in over 35 games that I have played in the ship and my winrate is 15%. (Note that my winrate otherwise is 54%). The matchmking for Talinn is just broken for some reason.

[@ME262MKI]

WOWS is just a sea version of WOT at this stage, they already anounced the equivalent of the british light tanks, in the form of the new US BB line, a line dead before release and next will they will add something ridiculous like the "wheeled tanks"

[@Nolsen]

I just thought of something! Why don't they add the N3 class battleships design as a tier 10 premium/freemium (I would pay for that)? You just have to change some things: 1. Increase the speed from 23 knots to 26 knots 2. Increase the anti-aircraft armament to a point that works at tier 10. 3.Make it have a really good heal to balance out the relatively thin armour Why else thinks this is a good idea?

[@SackMaggie]

In short just click play.

[@marley9800]

Is this a anti furry ship? I cop it

[@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014]

HE DPM is pretty low to be honest, from what I’ve heard

[@antoniohagopian213]

BUFF KHABAROVSK

[@Strong_UP_Calvins_zombie]

Russian cruisers guns are awesome long almost BB range...I remember Kirov was a tier V monster

[@tuSpartanDady]

More overpowered ships, nice wargaming, You are doing the DDs job more and more painful, nobody needs radars in the game

[@pletchlupus2306]

Why AA It not animated???

[@timbernhardt7699]

How can someone even take this company serious anymore lmao.

[@sussy9278]

Because people like the game smh your those kids who complain yet they still play :/ Get a life kid

[@topkek8671]

Third

[@eaandersson5522]

Fourth

[@gundaniumdovah]

There's no audio

[@EidolonTeralyst]

bruh let me get that petro skin why are they time gated pain

[@EidolonTeralyst]

space camo being not time gated is such an awesome thing I would have bought this too

[@Kilen_BE]

On Tallinn, IFHE is a must have after survivability expert. AP remains excellent, but in practice broadside opportunities are not the majority of situations u face. And with 180mm guns, IFHE skill make it very deadly (37mm pen) with constant dmg penetrating lots of ships. When I unlocked it, I had only a 10pts capt for him, and I struggled to do good games in Tallinn (aka minimum 100k dmg). After get the Riga and others stuffs I was focused on, I decided to comeback to Tallinn and rush from skill10 to skill14 on him asap (using fxp & capt XP + playing him everydays until I reach that skill14 to get IFHE asap). And since I got it, it’s day and night ! Now Tallinn is a good dmg dealer in every situations, and not just on easy targets or advantageous situations. I always end with 100k dmg+ in every games I did since with (wich wasn’t so often the case before I get IFHE). So, I highly recommend IFHE for Tallinn, switching for AP when it’s worthy, but still using HE like 60% of the time (or 2/3 of time roughly). It’s the right way to go imo.

[@Hanimichal]

Better "Stalingrad" on line tree than only for some experts buying for a steel Many THANKS WG and please more equality between players stopping to push OP just for OP players

[@V8Vortec]

There's normally a section that discusses the ships downsides.....did I miss it?

[@banditodorito4091]

ah yes paper ships

[@lud7286]

Sooooooo technically you can 360 detonate an enemy in the petropavlovsk....

[@DividedByZeero]

Soviet Cruisers! Please no I don’t want suffering from russian bias

[@sussy9278]

Why care about them adding russain ships? Smh no one cares

[@DividedByZeero]

Intact you obviously have no idea about russian bias

[@zastronomer7592]

petro:citadel yamato

[@droidmotorola3884]

basically shoot anything with anything at time and place.

[@koyeldattagupta5571]

These Soviet Heavy Cruisers are just like Soviet Battleships

[@Ghost-gc7dj]

MM will be packed with Petros and Nevskys

[@ingocernohorsky]

Imagine a mod to play without paperships...

[@SauronRhun]

its time to uninstall the game bois!

[@sussy9278]

Sure you will its like you matter at all smh

[@travonwatson1405]

Guns that can rotate a full 360 degrees? Uk im starting to think wg said to hell with balancing. Instead of adding new op ships to the game like the entire russian fleet why not add new tiers and put modern ships into the game

[@Goodman-4525]

Everytime they say DFAA I chuckled

[@1panhelado]

Now this is a warship… Naval power is ours

[@rahmattulloh1844]

insert song PETROPAVLOVSK

[@CAPTAINNUT-ze3fu]

Add aircraft carriers to xbox

[@AllAhabNoMoby]

Two words: Power. Creep.

[@frankvc5899]

Use the Balans and you will be fine

[@Lohuanprieto]

I need to have all !!!!!!!

[@fakulm1436]

"Cruisers" kekw

[@janz.9385]

Tallinn is a great ship.