SPACE TIME: Understanding of universe - Deep dive in elementary particles, the fundamental of all!

SPACE TIME: Understanding of universe - Deep dive in elementary particles, the fundamental of all!
Elementary particles are the smallest known building blocks of the universe, forming everything we observe. These particles include quarks, which combine to form protons and neutrons, and leptons, such as electrons and neutrinos. Forces between particles are mediated by force carriers like photons for electromagnetism and gluons for the strong force. Understanding these particles and their interactions is crucial for exploring the fundamental structure of matter.
Prof. Ulrich Walter, former astronaut, takes a deep dive into the subject.
#weltdocumentary #weltnachrichtensender #spacetime #astronauts #astrology #physics
📺 Watch more documentaries • Full Documentaries
🔔 Subscribe to our full documentary channel
/ @weltdocumentary

[@SpotterVideo]

What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.....

[@Pasha8204]

Need all space video in 4k no 1080p...

[@Seekthetruth3000]

19:02, Dmitri Mendeleev Russian chemist 1860s, not 1960s.

[@HappyRescues]

The universe is different ages in different areas.. time is not the same everywhere

[@alextownsend8624]

Let's gooooo

[@scottgreen3807]

It was also said that quantum physics is stranger than you think because it’s stranger than you can think.

[@petereknetreba2697]

waru zwei schprachen..

[@KartikPatel-nt4ff]

😅😮😅😮😅😅😮😅😮😅😮😅😅😅😅😅😅well I information good show you 😅😅

[@xifoscarbonex4653]

And why welt, and not word ? translate to us english 🤭

[@QDoppio]

People clinging to the dead metaphysics not to lose their life jobs, understandable but wrong fundamentally

[@QDoppio]

Not at all fundamental if you know latest (2022) nobel winners work in the high energy physics… You are still rehearsing 400 year old dead metaphysics

[@ronaldwalvin]

c a D

[@xifoscarbonex4653]

Blasphemie 🤣😂😅🤭🎯