📲To Enroll Law Foundation Batch For Free - smart.link/48d3mk2o0n6zh Law Foundation Batch: This Free batch is for those students who are preparing for Judiciary Exam, CLAT Aspirants, LLB Students. 📲PW App Link - smart.link/m4rvjjxijr6wd 🌐PW Website - www.pw.live
@nayinaslkishayari4020 Жыл бұрын
✅
@Theartofstudentlaw Жыл бұрын
Not being too much familiar but ek baat bolunga.....as an student ki guru or shikshak agar lag bhag 3:30 ghante learn & Study Kara ra h focus & Concentration ,with intrest also to unse पढ़ना और समझना बहुत गर्व की बात है क्योंकि इतनी देर तक एक जगह स्थिर रहकर पढ़ना सबके बस की बात नही। वो भी फ्री में .... Hats off you TEACHER (Mam).🙏
@shivanivyas9640 Жыл бұрын
Just to clear Ma’am SRA is a procedural law because it applies certain kind of relief even Supreme Court considered a sSRA as a procedural law in - Adhunik steel vs. Orissa manganese .
@aditipandey9855 Жыл бұрын
yes exactly
@swetagupta838 ай бұрын
Mam one thing I must say this time u r the best teacher on you tube for law subjects,,,, wonderful mam,,, u become my role model mam,,, I also want to become like you mam😊😊
SRA is procedural in nature only sec 6 of SRA is substantive soo it considered as procedural law
@RahulYadav-uq4kq Жыл бұрын
Rahul's wale 😁
@amitkrai76406 ай бұрын
how sec 6 is substantive
@judicialstudy3918 Жыл бұрын
One of the best video on KZbin for SRA... May god bless u maam... Hard work DIKHTA HAIIIIII
@shalinirastogi1798 Жыл бұрын
Aap kuch jada he acha pdhate hain,ek dm concept clear kra kr, thanku mam
@TgbRathore3 ай бұрын
Galat information hai isme kaafi
@enigma876827 күн бұрын
It is a procedural law Held in the case of Adhunik steels ltd Vs St of Orissa Only sec -6 of SRA is Substantive in nature
@sachinveer33539 ай бұрын
Great Channel.. Great Work.. Legal study and Awareness in depth is what this country needs.
@shantanusinha7895 Жыл бұрын
God bless you Mam aap itna bara problem solve kar diye
@Kirannn0118 күн бұрын
The whole lecture is great but 54:00 vala gyaan is precious ❤
@ayushbansal5191 Жыл бұрын
Thank you thank you so much mam . really helpful for me. I wish aap aise he sb students ki help krte rahe🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
@seemaindurkar107210 ай бұрын
Bahut achha padhay ma'am sra act 😊 thank you
@singeRaj115 ай бұрын
તમે પોતાની ચેનલ બનાવી તે બદલ આપને ખુબ ખુબ શુભકામનાઓ સોલંકી મેડમ
@maheshnaik-e8i17 күн бұрын
Very well explained madam
@GautamKumar-mh6xf Жыл бұрын
Thnku so much ma'am, first time aacha se smgh aaya
@MadhukarKrishna-x8x10 ай бұрын
Section 5 is to be taught with Article 65 AND 64 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, in order to draw clear reference w.r.t Title suit and Possession Suit within section 5. And Section 6 with Article 64 Limitation Act.
@Advocateshivanibajpai3280Ай бұрын
Nice session on SRA , tq ma'am 🙏
@priyankakaithwas6 Жыл бұрын
To Finally mam ap yha mil hi gai
@prakashyadav-dw7hj7 ай бұрын
23.36.S.R.A. provides only relief not create any right or liability and not give any procedure.
@akku62389 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this lecture ma'am. 😊
@ravinamsaut Жыл бұрын
Great session ma'am you made the concept so easy with wonderful examples😊
@bharatgupta2609 ай бұрын
best video of SRA Act , thank you so much ma'am
@MadhukarKrishna-x8x10 ай бұрын
Court may allow Joinder of Causes of Action under O2R3 or may in discretion Direct for seperate trial under O2R6 when under sub sec. 4 of section 6 ,title is claimed along with possession as both being different Cause of Action. (Interlinking vd CPC must be taught as SRA is complimentary to CPC) But U taught very well on provisonal points.
@venikaseth8 ай бұрын
3:08:57 injunctions generally
@adv.satyamshrivastava458 Жыл бұрын
Your lecture is wonderful ma'am
@priyagautam6067 Жыл бұрын
Very nice video madam thank you so much
@shalinirastogi1798 Жыл бұрын
Section 28, awesome smjhaya mam
@RituSharma-pk6wg Жыл бұрын
ma'am, there is no provision under s. 12 (3), neither in a nor b case. the other party cannot claim compensation.
@ishitashukla2036 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much maam for this. Grateful
@TrailSpinners Жыл бұрын
Very good lecture mam
@Avie-kb6hb10 ай бұрын
Thanks Mam 🙏🙏
@poojaadvocate2958 Жыл бұрын
Super duper session mam 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 no compare for this session
@decodebareacts46616 ай бұрын
Hello mam. Mam you tell that promotor are those who propagate the company, when u taught sec15. But mam promotor of the company are those person who is the founder of the company.
@Art-Tornado14 күн бұрын
14 ka d. Agar defendant ke pass right he contract ko void declare karane ka to specific performance nahi ho sakta ase contract ka
@LEGIRLPREP8 ай бұрын
Thanks mam u make SRA so simple
@nikitarajput11877 ай бұрын
SRA konsa law hai..... Substaintive ya procedural law
@gauravkumarsingh741 Жыл бұрын
Kuch bhi ma'am.....section 6 me aap Title ke liye suit file karwa Rahi hai.....waah....56.51.
@parushisharma63105 ай бұрын
1:06:32 mistakenly and wrongfully are different
@narendrasinghsolanki2315 Жыл бұрын
Very good lecture mam🎉
@ranisuthar389210 ай бұрын
Thank you so much mam ❤
@uraddhuli Жыл бұрын
Sec 6 m title raise nhi kar sakte mam
@Pallabi36756 Жыл бұрын
Thankyou for the session mam But i think there's a mistake in interpretation of clause d of section 14.. It is talking about contracts that are terminable in nature.. for example partnership at will
@shinydropkaur7 ай бұрын
Yes mam here determinable means which can be terminated any time (not for which damages can be determined)
@mitalimohanty66086 күн бұрын
yes exactly
@GaneshBS45810 ай бұрын
Good learning madam thank you But in 12(3)(b)(ii) Whether Relinquishment is a prior condition for instituting a suit or not???
@iqbalhothi84511 ай бұрын
Thanks 🙏🏻 you mam
@chandusanjot365 Жыл бұрын
very nice session 👌👌👌
@aishanijain8255 Жыл бұрын
Barabar😂 is the key word 😂😂😂
@Vox_Populi865 Жыл бұрын
Ji Barabar😄
@ishabeniwal608 ай бұрын
Iske notes kha se lene hai telegram per tooh nhi hai
@shalini-d6h Жыл бұрын
Thanks mam.... mam jrf net ke lie international law bhi padha dijie
@shahilkashyap1517 Жыл бұрын
very nice lecture
@tusharmehta5727 Жыл бұрын
Mam section 6 clause 4 me owner k title ki bat hori h na ap tenant k liy bata rahe ho to thoda cle nhi h coz vo clause specific uske liy to nhi h jise disposed kia h balki isliy h ki owner ko khudka title claim karne se koi nhi rokega..plz clarify
@ShivaniThakur-bg8xu10 ай бұрын
Thank you so much Mam
@yuktivarshney657510 ай бұрын
Codicil means modified will or part of a will
@aartiyadav9167 Жыл бұрын
Just too good ma'am....can you please made video lecture on indian trust Act for BJS 🙏
@nikitarajput11877 ай бұрын
Mam plese aap rent control act ko bhi pdhao plz mam 🙏
@sampathmotadi2231 Жыл бұрын
Can we buy the notes
@jungkookedits976 ай бұрын
5:55 starting
@Ays67djd Жыл бұрын
Ma'am subjectwise judgements ka bhi start krva do
@MamtaPal-j4b11 ай бұрын
Mam reversioner or remainder man same hi to hue dono m diff smjha skte ho mam pls?
@Chetna1012 Жыл бұрын
Sec 15(h), as explained, seems a bit wrong as read by me in the bare act. Can you please confirm?
@Sheph0311 ай бұрын
Yes... Because ma'am said promoters. It should be the company who can claim and not the promoters. Likewise in Sec. 19
@Riya-tp6wmАй бұрын
Please teach court fees act
@RAMKARAN-wc2mt5 ай бұрын
V good mam BNS bnss bsa also plz
@poojaahrodia14838 ай бұрын
Agr kisi property p dispute h title ko lek to vo sra se cover hoga ky... Means ye mttr konse act konse sec se cover hoga... Plz btaye
@MamtaPal-j4b Жыл бұрын
Mam I have a doubt regarding sec 12 (3) part b is that smaller part to phle bhi perform krne k liye ready tha court Jane se kya hi faida hua aggrieved part ko fhr court gya hi kyu compensation to kuch Mila nhi
@rrp7872 ай бұрын
Mam iska pdf kaha milega
@yuktivarshney657510 ай бұрын
Mam where I can find this one page strategy for all minor laws in good pixels
@aditikulkarni2771 Жыл бұрын
Nhi mil Raha mam telegram PE apke pdf notes
@anupriya400320 күн бұрын
Ek no
@tusharmehta5727 Жыл бұрын
A little doubt mam, in sec 20 it was mentioned that notice should be given but it mentioned "and on his refusal or failure to do so" which means if notice not given but other party refuses or fail then also we can claim without notice. Please correct me if i am wrong
@BinduKottana Жыл бұрын
The “refusal or failure to do so” that is mentioned in the section relates to the performance of the contract and not regarding the giving of notice. So after the notice is given and if even after that the party breaching the contract does not perform or refuses to perform the contract then the other party can get it performed through a third party or by his own agency. I hope that I understood your question correctly.
@mankeshlamba1_13_711 ай бұрын
section 34 DD is jus in personam or in rem?
@crp535 Жыл бұрын
Mam ky trusty prior interest hota he
@HumaBashir-d1n Жыл бұрын
Mam is it helpful for mains or prelims judiciary?
@AdvNidazubi-is6kn Жыл бұрын
Sra is procedural law not substantive
@divyasharma-bv7rs21 күн бұрын
How can i get pdf of SRA now If anyone has pdf plzz share
@Prateek_Anup Жыл бұрын
Thank you ma’am for such a great session.
@tusharmehta5727 Жыл бұрын
A little doubt mam, in sec 20 it was mentioned that notice should be given but it mentioned "and on his refusal or failure to do so" which means if notice not given but other party refuses or fail then also we can claim without notice. Please correct me if i am wrong
@pushpamyadav8334 Жыл бұрын
Notice be given to perform within time specified than on his failure to do so part can obtain substituted performance
@Nops007448 ай бұрын
Sra is procedural law mam
@navitagupta-g1r Жыл бұрын
Where can i get the charts?
@HardikSingh-hv6fe7 ай бұрын
interpretation bhi krwa do rjs k hisab se
@dimplebhatia3043 Жыл бұрын
Very nice lecture
@Pooja-s7d7x Жыл бұрын
Exellent mam
@janvisharma7000 Жыл бұрын
Ma'am.... what's the difference between cancellation and recession?