Megalithic Softening of Stone Part 1

[@RostislavLapshin]

Several methods of fabrication of the polygonal masonry using clay/gypsum replicas, a topography translator, and reduced clay models of the stone blocks along with a 3D-pantograph are described in the article “Fabrication methods of the polygonal masonry of large tightly-fitted stone blocks with curved surface interfaces in megalithic structures of Peru”. KZbin does not allow a direct link. Search by the article title.

[@saintarmstrong8790]

Clay isn't granite

[@RostislavLapshin]

@@saintarmstrong8790, reread the article once more.

[@MamasFunkyMonkey]

@@RostislavLapshin clay isn't granite

[@RostislavLapshin]

@@MamasFunkyMonkey , reread the article once more.

[@MamasFunkyMonkey]

@@RostislavLapshin but it's not granite

[@karmicmessenger]

How beautiful it must have been when its ruins are so majestic

[@mrolas5683]

If modern man can’t figure out the technology of the ancients, it makes you wonder where they got the technology to begins with

[@paulsotheron710]

Aliens.

[@thatswhatshesaid.literally737]

😐 "Aliens", also known as extra dimensional entities that were brought here by the fallen angels.

[@Na_Me0815]

Or maybe maybe modern man is just dumb as a rock.

[@irishelk3]

Probably one of the most fascinating of all world mysteries.

[@luketracey3269]

Underwater lava ? Cool enough to handle ...hot enough to shape and mold ?

[@daieast6305]

there are many mysteries in life. another fascinating mystery would be societys of humans were formed to give abundance and peace to humans and yet society is birthplace of war and slavery.

[@luketracey3269]

@@daieast6305 where?

[@hectorgarcia9790]

Absolutely. Yes, this is an amazing mistery.

[@stephenjosephson2013]

If this has been mentioned before, my apologies: I've done a lot of injection-mold design, and often thought that the 'knobs' found on so many megalithic stones resemble the 'gates' through which material enters the mold. Other indentations look precisely as though the unhardened material was pressed upon, to adjust or re-position the mass, prior to hardening. This surface 'stucco' look is found in many places, along with the scooping and molded clay-like appearance of solid rock. I agree that Cymatic technology is a good candidate for the method used to de-stabilize the material.

[@MechanicalMooCow]

Stephen Josephson I agree, but also, as a carpenter they remind me also of tenons. Iirc, the columns at stonehenge also have these notches in them, with matching mortices in the lintels. That could be another possibility.

[@00cedge]

sounds very plausible but almost all the stones I've seen are different shapes or sizes which would mean custom moulds for each one? Which would make the process kinda pointless

[@sillybollox2244]

The knobs are the vestiges of supporting props that allow a stone to be undercut. I think they aren't completely fettled off as they are handy stays for ropes; props that allow ropes to be bound around the stone; pivot points; perches for birds, and may have been regarded as 'belly-buttons' from the 'birthing' of the shaped stone from Mother Earth.

[@rikirikibis]

@@sillybollox2244 This is the first interesting theory I read in this forum. This is not bad at all. I believe the builders used high speed saws to cut the rocks and boulders. The scooping marks found in assuan and cuzco suggest they used a sort of pneumatic or vibrating hammer with large blades. The marks would have smoothed with time (thousands of years). But even with a pneumatic or vibrating hammer, you need some support when undercutting the stones. The pillars may have been broken at the last minute leaving the knowbs. I would expect them to be removed with the same tools, but you may be right that they played some role also in the positioning of the blocks.

[@sillybollox2244]

@@rikirikibis Thank you! I too think the scoop marks were made with vibrating chisels. The seemingly drilled holes were also made with vibration, as there is no evidence of rotation, and the ends of the holes are often star shaped, as if the cutting tool has begun to crimp into itself. I spend a lot of time thinking about these things!! 🤯🤪🤣

[@mahkokhan]

it is obvious that the masters of these structures found this work easy and easily reproducible. furthermore whatever means were utilised was plentifull and world spanning in scope.

[@MellowYellow.]

Anybody that's worked cement like I have might draw same conclusion, it looks like it was poured into place because of intricate angles...this is pre-ice age advanced civilization tech way before Incas.

[@anthonymichaels536]

Ed Stack >>>Looks like cement and rebar structures to me too. Some has been doctored up, but others cast in place for sure.

[@gofigure4920]

Most are petrified wood made from mega trees that were cut down to extinction.

[@DucatiQueen]

The dinosaurs did it !

[@rikirikibis]

It may look like but it is not, simply beacuase it is not cemet. It is not a chemical ligant such a cement and sand, it is hard rock, makde of cristalline structures and minerals. The formation of granite and diorite stone requires the slow cooling of huge massess of molten lava, deep underground, at huge pressure.

[@duckpuddles]

Rikrikibis is there not a possibility that certain sands, which I assume can be any material formed by erosion, could not be bound together using some long forgotten catalyst to give the same effect as pressure and molten larva that you describe I cannot see how those massive stones with all kinds of odd shapes could have been put in position and removed to shave to fit maybe dozens of times using the tools they had available.

[@johnwick-ii6il]

A temple in India has stone chains hanging from it's outdoor corners. The circular links are made from different types of stone. This seems impossible unless the links were molded around eachother in a softened state.

[@Fruity_lexia]

There are many temples in india with this kind of decoration. The chains are carved from one rock, not many. You can very easily research this.

[@johnwick-ii6il]

@@Fruity_lexia Just because normal stone chains were carved from one rock, does not mean that they ALL were. We are referring to one specific anomalous case

[@Fruity_lexia]

@@johnwick-ii6il Can you provide me with a link or a name please?

[@johnwick-ii6il]

@@Fruity_lexia Praveen Mohan. How do musical pillars work. Still searching for the other one.

[@Pitereczek100]

2:20 looks like somoene was checking if stone already became hard

[@burtbenz9964]

impressions look applied when soft

[@wallacewithoutgromit]

What few people who are not quarrymen realize is that when monolithic stone first comes out of its original bed rock and still has its original moisture called quarry sap it is very soft and much easier to work. With prolonged exposure to air it becomes quite hard. The ancient Greeks had to build the twenty thousand ton Parthenon in only eight or nine years before the marble reached its present hardness.

[@cliffcurtistruth]

Not only did they have an ability to soften stone but they had a machine to render heavy stones weightless for transportation and placement purposes.

[@nicolasrose3968]

Yes Cliff whatever you say Cliff...

[@trippyturtle777]

I think the ancients had the ability to harness the magnetic energy of earth through a highly advanced tool or some type of resource that is now no longer naturally available

[@donlitos]

@@trippyturtle777I bet you think you can fly too good luck

[@trippyturtle777]

@@donlitos just my opinion man, and yea I do wish I could fly. Have a good day God bless 🙌🏽

[@awesome-o7220]

@@donlitos no need to be a dick, sir. thats just his opinion of how they could have moved such objects. what is your idea? i myself cant find an explanation for it. how did they make precision cuts in such hard stone? how did they move such heavy stones? our tech today can do so but with so much equipment that we say they cannot have. today we use huge cranes to move heavy objects, how did they do it? we cant find their tools, or building plans. its pretty mind blowing

[@juicefastforhealth]

You are correct. As a past archaeologist, I left the field because of all the deceit and stupidity. It was done using several if not many kinds of frequencies, in my opinion. They had a frequency to soften the stone, a way of scooping it while soft from the Mother Stone, a way (most likely through frequency again) of making it weightless, a way of transporting it while weightless from one area to another (flying it with their crafts?), a way of positioning it within a mold, and then another frequency to reharden it, which puffed it out a bit and gave it the smooth muffin look across the top with the mold imprint all around each edge that looks almost like a thumbprint. That's for the huge stones. For the cut grooves and squares and other shapes, once again, directed frequency.

[@mts7274]

lmfaoooo... 😂😂😂

[@MamasFunkyMonkey]

@@mts7274 lol thankyou.... I was thinking wtf did she smoke

[@mts7274]

@@MamasFunkyMonkey Jamaican ganja... slow dipped in ayahuasca and monkey dung.

[@MamasFunkyMonkey]

@M TS I love how she acts like she's the all knowing most likely sitting between a few crystals she thinks gives her special powers .... she has no idea how it was done but knows she's correct

[@Baseball4ever0130]

The saddest thing is that neither of you two know anything about frequencies and the power they have. We harness electrical power. I also like her believe they harnessed the full power of resonance frequencies.

[@STONEPOET2]

I work with natural stone and much of it is quite hard. Some of the basalts that I use are 8+ on the Moh's scale and range upto 30,000 PSI compressive strength. I use diamond impregnated tools to manipulate material to toleraces close to the photos shown on this video. Could I achieve the results without the modern technology? Yes, it would just take an absurd amount of time and energy. These incredible creations stem from determined, passionate, humans overflowing with a vigorous life force. Sometimes the hardest way is the best way. If you have never worked a stone, or moved a large stone, you should go do that. Go re-ground yourself with a sobering dose of reality. No magnets, smoke and mirrors, giants, or aliens...Just a bunch of serious people hitting something hard with something harder. Repeatedly, skillfully, and passionately.

[@Foxglove963]

Stonepoet2. There, that's it. Those people possessed absolute determination and interacted with PLACE.

[@jeffbaggett291]

As a life long stone mason myself that has spent three months in Peru studying the stone work with an open mind and I can tell you there is no simple solution. Ollantytambo is my favorite of all the temple sites. Ollantaytambo was being constructed when the Spanish invaded so it is a good in process study. Two of the stones were hauled 4 miles up hill from the quarry that weighed 75 tons plus with 1 mile still to go. 20 percent of the stones were fractured by the Inca masons to be shed off. What hit me was the question, "Why didn't they shed the 20 percent back at the quarry?" Moving the stone, just like cutting them was so easy they did not worry over it. If you go to Sascayhuman there is an incredible amount of masonry carving and stone work all over the surrounding hills for miles around the incredible temple site itself as well. What happened there is technologies that have been lost.

[@nobodythatyouknow241]

Thanks for the sane comment. I totally agree with you.

[@333bejara]

Soft or hard it should weigh the same. Transport is the issue. Regardless of those issues, those structures are amazing. Unexplained currently but for now speechless.

[@sebjones137]

do you know you can levitate things with sound?

[@333bejara]

Sound levitation implies a machine producing sound at variable wavelengths. And portable. If you can manufacture this device. why work with earth minerals {limestone, granite etc...} The device implies knowledge of metals. So why bother with a stone build.

[@cutsrosescents4950]

Yes play dough was popular in ancient times

[@peaceandwealthseeker4504]

@@333bejara cheaper and less input of energy to produce

[@333bejara]

Hello@@peaceandwealthseeker4504 - As said before a "machine that resonates sound would probably not be made of stone, so the implication would be that greater knowledge with superior materials such as metal or a more complex material is commonplace. It would be like creating a very advanced "robot" to build grass huts and then believing the grass huts are shelter of the most current technology available at that time,

[@modeldaughters]

Has thin slice, mass spec and x-ray (xrd) analysis been done on these structures? It would help those on any side of any theory.

[@no36963]

Magnetic anomalies have been detected in many stones.

[@naimulhaq9626]

The music was heavenly. The best flute ever. Magical and mesmerizing. Thank you.The link above doesn't have the flutes. Please give me the link where I can hear more of the beautiful flutes, please. They sound like American Indian flutes.

[@mauri1400]

Shut up bro.

[@Hutch5321]

Here ya go ...... "Dance Of The Earth" ...... kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpm8d3SIh8SIbLM

[@alexg6374]

Actually this flute is a sopranino in Fa.

[@multirichard007]

Sierra H - I am completely with you on this one. I have reached an exactly similar conclusion to you. The ancients had some way to render hard objects into malleable material like a plastiscene and so shape them easily, and their surfaces would remain separate but blend together. Or they could vibrate them (using sound?) so that the surfaces moulded together. Just because we don't have or use this technology now DOES NOT mean that it doesn't exist. I also believe that the ancients could move very heavy objects with weights of 2,000-3,000 tonnes using sound to change their physical property of mass so that they could be literally 'pushed' into place. This is how giant megaliths were moved across the countryside by ordinary people, and temples at Baalbeck and walls in Siberia built with stone blocks weighing upto 3,000 tonnes which were moved up slopes.

[@namiroraha7473]

any volcano nearby?

[@daieast6305]

perhaps so but only perhaps because if it could be done today then people certainly would be doing it and the nature of granite stone is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow so folks sure would like to enjoy such earthquake proof structures...we know alot about today but not about the ancients, one way or the other!

[@Bart-Did-it]

😂

[@veronicaroach3667]

Since this is one of my favorite subjects I may have seen this video B4 hence there might be a very old comment of mine somewhere down in that long list ! However - it seems to me that there is no doubt about the strangeness of this phenomena - my feeling is that we are stymied by the folks who think they have DEFINITELY got the timeline figured out - and they could be totally wrong about history - what if there was a period of time after massive earthquakes, roiling continents etc after which period there was, for some time, stone in the process of cooling that was easily malleable as in 'clay' - and until it all hardened it could be worked to make all these very odd walls that are found worldwide - something simply doesn't add up with what the experts consider FACT & what we see ! So I expect the 'experts' to eventually change how they see things. It's either something like that OR these 'stones' are simply a cement product - some of the underlying pyramid blocks (not the facing granite stones that still remain on site) appear to have plant parts within them, which would be impossible if they were million year old stone, rather than a mixed cement-like product !

[@accordingtohonda4308]

Ancient Egypt experts already told us = slaves and brass hand tools errr I mean rocks. This allowed them to carve perfect internal corners into a box. Yep, no TV and no internet made them super fantastic rock clubbers n' rubbers. If you try really hard and practice 10,000 hours you can rub a chunk of granite into a perfect, mirror smooth little gift box for your gammie with a relief photo of her and her dog on the lid. Great video by the way! Some of the comments on these videos have me a bit pissed so I’m triggered. You get a free SUB and a bonus like!!!1!!

[@PhilJonesIII]

Now how did they cut, fashion and grind the stone? Such a big mystery especially when you are so desperate to link up with extra-terrestrials and lost technologies better than our own. S America, rich ( and I mean RICH ) in diamonds and endless supply of grinding paste. When artisans finish a job they tend to take their tools with them especially when the tools tend to be expensive and personalised. Source : The voyage of Richard Francis Burton down the Sao Francisco.

[@luisaraujo8697]

Wonderful, wonderful, no words, thoughts, to explain, such, incredible works, many, many thanks Sierra H, love it!...

[@freshimpactco.8698]

It is something which I have pondered over for a while now... There are great questions surrounding the scoop like marks in various ancient qurey locations around the world.. With very obvious and seemingly effortless intricate detailed and acurate cutting and drill like holes which could only be achieved by a long forgotten and lost technology, our ancient ancestors built perfect stone constructions without mortar. There are also seems to be actual movement of stones by some unknown method of transportation, so large we can only wonder in marvel at how they managed some of their construction. I would consider water drills as one possible method.. circular saw marks are evident, however the diameter and width of the blades used lends itself to the idea that they had advanced saws beyond the capabilites of what we have today and what seems to be a way in which stones were removed much like a knife to butter! In fact I would suspect some stone work is from pouring the stone into some kind of mould like device... its the only thing I have managed to come up with as an explanation to some of these artifacts and stone structures. So whats the low down? There seems to be a number of these methods employed for the various masonry works and whether this is due or attributed to a particular civilization or geographical location, I would probably be against that notion for the reason that the methods I suspect were used are evident in all megalithic cultures... or at least some of these are observed... I would love to go back the countless 10s of thousands of years to see who did it and how it was done lol. One thing is for sure, ancient civilisation communicated globally and they very likely traded amongst themselves. I would also agree that the idea of stone age man must be thrown out the window so we can investigate these ideas constructively.

[@tpxchallenger]

Well one thing our ancestors had was time. Thousands of years in the same place. I'm still sticking with the old idea of using rock to shape rock. I, for one, am completely in awe of our Neolithic ancestors. We know for a fact that medieval cathedrals took two or three lifetimes to build and the same must be true of the working and placing of megaliths.

[@richardksimpson800]

If each stone is different, then molding is not a viable option. Think outside of the box. Once one stone is formed the following space is scanned and a new block is formed. Visualize a technology similar to 3D printing and I think you are nearly there. Instead of epoxy they were using liquefied stone. Each block is different because it makes the structure stronger when stacked. Blocks of a unified shape are weak when stacked like brick. Logic dictates that whoever built these things used this method because it was EASY for them, not hard.

[@omni5129]

I read an article a while back about a bird watcher who stumbled across a species of Kingfisher deep in Peru or around that area. He noticed that it made it's nest/burrow by the banks of a river/creek/stream, not in dirt/earth/clay as do most Kingfishers, but in the face of solid rock. It was a perfectly round hole. He asked a local in this remote area about this and was told that the birds use a local plants leaves, apply the leaves, or perhaps chews and uses the moisture ... applies it to the rock and it makes it soft. This guy then set out to find said plants. He was walking to someones place, that apparently these plants were along the way, but he got lost, went the long way .. bla bla bla ... got to this other persons place, without finding the plants ... but later noticed the metal hooks on his hiking boots had all but melted away.... he tried to back track to see if he could work out where he had gone and what what he had walked through to cause his metal hooks to melt ... but couldn't ......... End of story, I am looking for the article again .... it was supposed that this plant was used to soften rocks by the ancients. Even used to make them molten/liquid and able to pour the rock into moulds.

[@jenschristiansen9490]

The stone softening technique is explained here: www.academia.edu/37497925/On_the_reddish_glittery_mud_the_Inca_used_for_perfecting_their_stone_masonry

[@hectorkeezy1499]

There has bin a LOOOOOT more going on,that we don’t know about yet. The “experts” are,ofcause,wildly opposed to the idea,that they don’t know it all. Poor things.🤣✌🏻

[@donlawler9510]

beautiful images and a great sound track - thanks for posting! (however...we shouldn't marginalize these wonderful creations by thinking there has to be a short cut. It was lots of mind-numbing work - and that was why they did it, to blow everyone's mind).

[@evanw.3473]

Ohhhh THAT's why they did it! Where'd they say that?

[@donlawler9510]

@@evanw.3473 You'll never have an original thought if you only go by what "they" say

[@evanw.3473]

@@donlawler9510 I was talking about the stone crafters...i didn't know they documented that reason for making the structures etc

[@donlawler9510]

@@evanw.3473 "they" didn't. My comment was an original thought based on a long life of difficult endeavors with megalithic stone sculpting

[@toddwestgate7033]

excellent vid.... music was very tranquil loved both. would very mutch like to converse with you about it and other related topics. :) todd

[@BeautifulllColours]

It seems to me that this blocks were not carved out of stone then transported and laid there. This blocks are actually made out of some kind of cement and they used molds to shape the blocks, on spot. And when one block dries off they can continue the proces and keep building the structure up.

[@DucatiQueen]

Wished our roads would last this long......

[@scientistsbaffled5730]

The road to the Past are hard and winding like the farts of a dove

[@billwillard6828]

They probably would if people would stop driving on them

[@sccanj]

Roads are meant to not las long, is a business

[@lucbos7516]

Granite has a meltingpoint of 1200C

[@georgewolfiii1170]

But they didn't soften it with high heat.

[@hintzofcolorconcepts]

Watched this video a dozen times or more now, (still loving the music). Wanting to reproduce these beautiful building styles for my place. Wonder how long it takes mud to petrify into stone?

[@kennymichaud5366]

In petra there are some tool marks left wether power or hand you can see the tool marks. Some marks look as it was raise up around the tool mark....video was by Brien Forster on youtube about petra. I think he might have 3 of petra....check them out when you have a chance

[@hintzofcolorconcepts]

John Huchison documented turning metal into soft putty-like material, but I'm not sure if that effect would work on stone, i imagine its just a matter of tuning the frequency to match the stone's resonance. He had also levitated bowling balls using electromagnetic technology, which might explain how these huge stones were moved as well as shaped.

[@runyon888]

Love that music.

[@lolbr3720]

I've wondered about such a thing. Where I grew up there is a sudden rise in elevation that exposes tall eroded limestone looking like giant chimney. I'm told limestone when sealed by the ground is quite soft & easy to carve. Many lost secret's...

[@rickroche8860]

Wow! One of the best presentations I've seen. Great choice of music, too.

[@spidar1919]

Thank you Rick, much appreciated!

[@mr.underdog8282]

Rick Roche I know! Wasn't that woman's voice beautiful? I'd love to hear more like that!

[@cichlidbro8566]

one of the best vids with respect to the softening of stone by the ancients that I've seen. A LOT of GREAT examples that I've yet to see anywhere else! Thanks for the upload!!!

[@ToddRickey]

Many of the megaliths displayed do indeed appear to have been molded by some agency, applied at the time of construction. Now, the stone in most if not all cases seems to be igneous rock of various composition. Maybe some of it is limestone, which could be softened or in fact dissolved by hydrochloric acid. Such a solution, or carbonic acid might be readily obtainable, though neither would work. But what other than heat could soften the igneous (fire-made) stone? Other questions arise for the stone-softening hypothesis: what could be the material for the stones' cast or form? If it was softened by melting, the cast would have to be impervious to high heat, if by acid, it would withstand very powerful corrosion? What else might soften such hard and dense igneous rock? The two softening agents mentioned so far would cause a great deal of recrystallization and/or mixing of the original groundmass. Any softening method would result in such changes in the stone near the surfaces only. Is this condition observed in the stones? Many of the ashlars are quite massive, the question of transportation remains even if they were somehow softened. There is another possibility, powered tooling. This method would simply cut into the rock, without the 'side-effects' as noted above. Power for the tools, which would have to be hard as gemstones, could be from a number of sources. One we are familiar with is electricity, which might have a few sources, like batteries. Ultrasonic vibrations might be used, derived from vibrating metal, etc. It certainly is enigmatic. These are a few suggestions. Certainly though, an ancient epoch with advanced knowledge is lost to history and was worldwide in extent, at least in communication.

[@swansinthesea5381]

They lived within a different paradigm of technology that was cohesive with nature and that was meant to last , a really long time.

[@joewhitfield5561]

Swansinthe Sea you're a moron

[@peaceandwealthseeker4504]

@@joewhitfield5561 hed correct actually

[@Dev-In-Denver123]

@@joewhitfield5561 HE'S the moron? He's completely right.

[@ufoxfox4352]

@@joewhitfield5561 wats ur explanation then to this stone work seems as you know wats wat ,,.?

[@thecure4470]

@@joewhitfield5561 why dont you say something creative or just go watch East Enders and believe its real...🥳

[@the_waxen_pith8128]

Beautiful pics and music thanks

[@vanhaydu]

These structures were crafted by the giants children with the play-dough sets they got for their birthday.

[@Linox82]

Molded stone theories has been on my mind for years. Puma punku is a good exemple. Nice video :-)

[@tardigrade9493]

This vlog is beautifully done, and it leaves space for the viewer to think about what is shown. Thank you.

[@spidar1919]

I really appreciate your comment....thank you!

[@tardigrade9493]

My pleasure.

[@megalithicamanic3968]

I always think that it must have been super easy for these beings/people to construct all these monuments when I look at the pictures this & many more video's contain, because it does look like scoops and precision cuts that only tools of a fairly advanced technology could achieve, certainly NOT chisels and pounders as they claim. M Wing, I could not agree more that they were probably capable of altering substances in the manner you explained or another method yet perhaps harder to explain, but nonetheless remarkably easier than sculpting them with those primitive tools. We know very little and absolutely anything is possible, though we may not believe so. Just because we cannot perceive it does not make it impossible.

[@mattm4600]

Your the one who is saying they can not perceive it as soon as you used the word "beings" just say humans you fool

[@RoyalTDynoman]

some type of ancient fresnel lens and mirrors ? just a thought I use mine to melt some rocks

[@Misterlegoboy]

+Royal Trent sr It would end up being igneous rock

[@diannaskare7829]

+Misterlegoboy and some are! they have even found were some were taken from!

[@MartyDidier]

Part 2 has a pic that’s significant with showing clues with how it was formed. The knobs show a draft angle, some steep and others less steep. That’s normally used with molds to help a break away release. Finished large blocks appear impossible to move after curing/setting. Hence suggests using some type of mold support for pouring. Knobs would hold mold panels in place till removal. Draft angle doesn’t allow mold panels to stick. The steeper the angle the easier to break away. Finishing the edges with typical cement type troll tools can be done while poured block becomes mooshy, like how cement is finished. This could be why we see hand prints and art drawn in finished blocks. Realize today’s cement builders use certain tools to finish their work which in concept can be applied to a different type of material similar to cement. Perhaps focus should be on the material that can be processed like cement! Twitter: @marty_didier

[@robertmitford5329]

Truly Amazing mind blowing lost for words 😳👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[@GaryMcKinnonUFO]

The old masonry has fascinated me for decades. I've read about plant acids softening stone (acetic, citric and oxalic), the Geopolymer institute have done a lot of work in this area. In old Scotland we melted rocks by using fires based on Gorse bush charcoal, it burns at up to 1500C and only around 1200C is needed for granite.

[@saschahofer413]

Dear Mr.McKinnon i have known a freemason that have me and my cousins told about such a Method, but we were childs and i could not remember the Names from his Sources. Unfortunaly he died before i could ask him again. But 2 other People i have heard about the same direction talking with Plants involved. 1 is from India the other one is from sri lanka. Praveen Mohan has talked about this. And the other one i can not find anymore he was also on KZbin he talked also about a Plant mixture that was able to ´´mold´´ some sort of stones. Could you provide a Source from which Geopolymer Institute or where you read about that. Wish you all the Best.

[@saschahofer413]

@@GaryMcKinnonUFO Thank you so much for this fast respond. Have seen you are into Ufo s and you are from the UK, from a scientific point of view this Man is close to the Truth. And a good source of UFO Mystery Content in UK ( so as a little favour back) kzbin.info

[@nigelking1559]

There's a giant cut stone still in the quarry at Baalbec which might tend to disprove the geopolymer or softening theory. However they did it and the sheer scale they did it on bends my mind. Also it's non polluting and Earth friendly. I wonder what traces our "civilisation" will leave?

[@WardAlienVideo]

I was thinking the same thing

[@danwalters5198]

These people ended up being. The pollution, these people were pre-flood there could’ve been as manny as 7 to 10 billion people alive on earth at that time you take them the dinosaurs and all the animals and you have today’s gas. Ironically they ended up being the pollution.....

[@jetli8703]

Plastic bottles

[@cnccarving]

most likely as technology advancing, we become more and more ""numb"" for creativity.. just need to imagine those people didn't have no tools, no clothes even.. they made everything theirselves.. so we cant just simply thinking with their head

[@cheapdirt07]

I have no doubt in my mind that these stones where formed in a softened state... i also believe the walls are not made up of blocks... but indeed softened somehow out of one great stone and the so called brick bond formation where actually etched in later to look like impossible brick layers... only this logical explanation satisfies my aching head to how and why these crazy people would make it so difficult for themselves... when in fact... it wasn't. Just decoration.

[@Bird76Mojo76]

They are in fact individual stones. This can be seen all over the globe.

[@Maxumized]

Those “stones” were mud after the great floods. Now they are just fossilized mud rocks

[@udumspam6668]

really....fossilized.

[@Gerhard3838]

Fossilized Granite.....are you sure ?

[@nobodythatyouknow241]

Sure they are.,

[@davidsurrey4778]

As someone who has worked cut polished stone... there is ABSOLUTELY no way we can replicate or achieve some of the things shown here or at other ancient sites. Some things we can today but with great effort and with technology but impossible to contemplate on the sheer scale of some blocks. Other things noticeable is noticeable is vitrification of some stone after being worked of which is impossible to us. Im telling u there is only 2 possible explanations to these wonders ... 1 the ancients were highly advanced and possessed technology beyond our understanding, such as our electronic devices compared with cavemen or 2.. an advanced alien race have visited us and made these sites. Anyone believing primitive man made these is a liar or completely mad. I am dumbfounded and in awe of these sites

[@moemuggy4971]

Why is it so hard to believe that some or most of this is done with "Concrete" for a lack of a better term.. more of a Geo-polymer. Sounds way more plausible than laser saws or alien vibration machines or whatever.. I guess people would rather believe the fantastic, rather than the simple explanation.

[@moemuggy4971]

+Hile you want me to show you how to pour concrete?

[@moemuggy4971]

Hile And you're 100% sure about that how?

[@moemuggy4971]

Hile Can you prove you're right?

[@moemuggy4971]

Hile Most likely Concrete

[@moemuggy4971]

further more... Where do they clone you Idiots?

[@newyoda]

I would love to know how they did that - absolutely draw dropping stuff. They somehow had laser precision joints in some of the hardest known natural materials....how? I also cannot comprehend how they chose the design in which the stones are fitted - it is extremely strong because of the irregular spacing - resistant to earthquakes.

[@ElveeKaye]

We are told that people carved these incredible structures using only tools of bronze and copper and stone. Alright, then, let's see a demonstration of that process. Shouldn't be hard to reproduce the kinds of tools that were supposedly used, and carve a chunk of basalt, diorite, or granite into a perfectly smooth, rounded shape with a perfectly square cavity in the middle. Yet nobody has ever done such a demonstration, and I doubt they ever will.

[@fixbertha]

How about a demonstration on softening stone? That seems equally unlikely. Also, there are obvious quarries in many locations to which much stone can be linked. And there are megalithic sites all over the world that show identical skills in shaping and moving huge stones. I heard an anthropologist say that you can't swing a cat without hitting some sort of "impossible" stonework. Bottom line is that we have no idea how or when this kind of stonework was done.

[@nobodythatyouknow241]

Okay so show me how they melted and molded these rocks. Fairy tales.

[@ElveeKaye]

@@nobodythatyouknow241 Well, it's obvious they weren't carved with chisels and hammers and then dragged into place with pony carts. So how do YOU think they were made?

[@dennisdonovan4837]

Not sure if anyone has examined the density patterns of the the crystalline mass of these rocks that purport to have been softened. If no mass was removed, as in ground or scooped out in some frictional manner, then there would be a differential massing of the rock immediately around the area of deformation. Take a block of wax warm it to the point that it can be plastically deformed then stick your thumb in it and make an impression. My guess is that you will find there will be a thicker layer of wax right below the indentation. So... My question is: "Has anyone done a analysis of the crystalline structure of one of these rocks to determine what the internal structure looks like?"

[@danielpas368]

I've been wondering about ancient stone work being concrete that has changed into other stone by way of natural long term chemistry. We already know that had mortar and concrete back then. Thoughts?

[@williamgrimberg2510]

Usually when I’ve seem something carved from quarried stone it has sharp vanes of different minerals running through it like marble , which from these pictures or videos I don’t see any. So that leaves me to believe that these are molded with maybe a thick slurry of crushed stone or cement. They may have been molded right in the ground where the earth has also some clay / earth mix then they removed the soil from around it when their mix was cured or they were done with that section of wall . Looking at these structures, it looks like they work one corse and molded one stone at a time while using something like straight boards to hold the exposed side in place , pore the mix to a certain level, let cure , remove the board and then repeat the process for the next one next to it . The slight side outward bulges of each block might be from the weight of the slurry against the earth/ clay mold . Just a thought.

[@williamgrimberg2510]

Also, doing ground molding they could create a multitude of shapes with pretty smooth surfaces without the use of metal tools .

[@dtownwarrior]

@@williamgrimberg2510 thats nice theory and all.. but some of the largest 1 peice stones found in Machu Pichu were 20 tons... how 🤔 is someone going to mold that much "liquefied stone".. how much wood would be used to make the molds? & how are the molds keeping that much weight without busting open? Then they move the stones & stack some.. & the quarries are miles away from the peak of the mountain top.. the mold theory is very hard to swallow

[@freedapeeple4049]

I hoping to see something educational or informational, not just a bunch of unlabelled pics with zero information of any kind. Nothing but clickbait. 👎👎👎

[@kohoko1952]

To me, many of the 'knobs' look like they were placed there for aesthetics...I don't deny that they may have a practical purpose, but the randomness of the placement of the knobs on the rock, such as at the bottom, in the middle, or near the top; I've seen them in all those locations. The 'knobs' make an otherwise flat surface have some texture and focuses the person's attention to the almost artful and amazing precision of different geometric patterns used to join each megalithic stone. Woodworkers use beautiful joinery such as dovetailed joints which have a very pleasing visual aesthetic but are also strong and practical.

[@ray7940]

One person had stated that these rocks could have been originally molded and the knobs are where the mold had been poured from, another site had these knobs that would align shadows onto ledges throughout the day like a clock, they are very intriguing nonetheless

[@filibertogarciasi]

Cool music. I felt like a Peruvian indian skipping thru the cliff edge and blowing on my handmade harmonica with bells strapped around my heel as i skip to the beat of my Harmony

[@robertknapp2118]

what you see is not stone, it's mostly ancient concrete (much like modern geopolymer) poured into moulds probably using baskets or buckets, and then smoothed or shaped while the concrete partially sets - the ingredients of ancient concrete were readily available such sand, gravel, mud, clay and volcanic ash to produce ancient concrete that we see as limestone, sandstone and granite holes in ancient concrete are easy to produce using timber or copper rods which can be easily knocked out after the concrete solidifies

[@ValCronin]

Any sources/links/vids for this info? Thank you for sharing. In some pics, all of the 'stones' were different colors--though each person or group could have different source stone as their ingredient.

[@robertknapp2118]

search KZbin for "Green Concrete" and "Geopolymer"especially when volcanic ash is used as a binder for the composite material the amateur geologists call as granite

[@schumannresonanceswithverte]

Romans made concrete, that is correct. "-Crete" comes form the island of Crete. However, these allegedly "poured" blocks are ALL granite, or other pure stone, not concrete. Over time, the lime and morter will wear-away, leaving a rough surface, like sandpaper, as the aggregate becomes exposed over time. All concrete over time will do this, exposing the interior unevenly. Those who deal with concrete will tell you this. Clearly you don't deal with concrete. These stones are uniformly smooth, and don't give-way like concrete does. These stones aren't poured, because, well, they get poured into a form, don't they? How did these early "pourers" create these rounded forms? poured concrete forms are linear, steraightlines, with obvious telltales that the material was poured. Again, workers in concrete know this very well. Creating rounded forms necessary to create these rounded shapes is JUST AS BAFFLING.

[@robertknapp2118]

modern concrete is based on portland cement and that type of concrete has a short lifetime such as a few hundred years at best, but ancient concrete based on volcanic ash has thousands or more years lifespan. I am a highly qualified construction engineer so know how ancient concrete (geopolymer)could easily be poured into curved formwork (look at the concrete at ancient Delphi)

[@tobin83]

Robert Knapp explain why thr granit and other Stones come from locations in the area? Did they made a mountain of concrete and then cit it? Idiot

[@hrantash]

I was born in Egypt, the Pyramids and all the stoneworks have fascinated me as young as I remember, I have read and watched videos about all the ancient people's ability, yet the experts claim they didn't have the proper tools and materials to build in such scale, and yet here they are all over the wold. Forget about aliens! I am not a scientist, but from what I see, I came to the conclusion that they must have had the ability to ether soften granite, or had the formula to mix and pour granit in to shape as we do with concrete today.

[@gwhiten2158]

Here we are off exploring space when there are mysteries like these on earth we can’t be bothered to figure out 🧐

[@theobserver9131]

Are you suggesting we should ignore space until all earthbound mysteries and problems are solved? I hope not. BTW, there is a robust community of researchers investigating these mysteries with open minds. The old school is dying out. Also, we may find answers to these earth mysteries IN space.

[@theobserver9131]

We're in space already anyway. The earth is one great spaceship.

[@whakaoriori9366]

Space lol any real proof

[@tatradak]

Yes great images but 100% machined, there is no other way...image finding a watch a million years old and then say it was curved from clay and hardened like steel....the universe is made of the same stuff as earth....

[@lakeschoolrestorationchann1567]

If you heat granite with a fire and quench it with water it becomes significantly easier to use tools or even small rocks to chisel away material. This for some reason has been overlooked in almost every video I have seen.

[@Robert-mc7bz]

Because the hammer and chisel theory as a whole is not gonna explain the greatest megaliths. Do thousands of hours of reading and research and if your not a moron you will come to the same conclusion.

[@thewizardoftod]

People dont know because they dont know who they truly are, once people know and except who they are these things and more will be possible. Peace.

[@rd9831]

to soften stone all you have to do is heat it sufficiently.

[@Barskor1]

Parabolic mirrors or Fresnel lenses will do it.

[@guillermodehollander]

Not a bad thought, but why won't it melt into lava? Most of the stones in Machu Pichu are granite.

[@Tyler.i.81]

It hurts the mind of the different possibilitys that could have been used to create these blocks and structures we are still no closer to understanding some of these majestic structures the wonder is in not knowing I think it opens up the mind to many possibilities. Lovely video Thankyou.

[@weozol4065]

it would make more sense if it was ancient cement.

[@joelgreene1581]

It was not ancient cement but soft granite. We looking at a time when some elements of the periodic table functioned somewhat differently.

[@j.k24]

but how does concrete look like after 20.000 years, how is granite created?

[@nobodythatyouknow241]

@@j.k24 granite is created by extreme heat and pressure. Deep under the earths surface. Where in the world is there 20000 year old concrete?

[@PSYCHODIGITALTALIS]

OK, can't stand it anymore, You poor beggars can't figure it out so I'll tell you. The stones were coated with a tree sap(stronger than leaf juice) which softens the stone to a depth. Then they are placed together and allowed to 'set' in to shape and form the perfect union with its' neighbor. Then they are trimmed around the edges and indented at seams so earthquakes won't chip the exposed edges. Studying stone pipe sections shows the rough edge of one end is fitted molecularly to the next so perfectly that water does not leak. Looking at Laotian jars you see human hand scoops in solid rock as if the rock were very soft clay or mud. Indicating the process/chemicals are not harmful to humans. Softening the entire stone is unfeasible and only the surface needs be done as gravity and lateral pressure fits the stones perfectly while they retain surface plasticity. Since they had no electrical capability they used sound waves to 'tune' the stones into settling. As for movement, I once picked up a 12"x12" oak beam 15' long that fell on my father when I was around 16. It weighed hundreds of pounds and I threw it aside like it was Styrofoam. Later I came back to replace it and couldn't lift it. That was a state of consciousness caused by a emergency situation. Who knows if a dozen zoned out guys could pick up a 20 ton rock and maneuver it without ropes?

[@bid84]

Charles Lynch Charles are you sure that oak beam didn’t fall on your head?

[@Kasivarsi]

Maybe they used the power of dragon fire.

[@clivegilbert727]

Spent a lot of time exploring old jungle temples in Cambodia,..and listening to the passed down stories thro the elders,.. One consistent story I heard, was that the "Giants", who helped the Cambodians build, ..could indeed make the stone "soft and light".

[@JesseWolfboy]

Then they'd also have to have the technology to levitate those huge blocks in order to build such structures...

[@roco8511]

Maybe the borrowed a forklift ; )

[@MechanicalMooCow]

New Rule Media you know in modern construction foundations aren't poured off site and moved into place. Who is to say the raw materials were not transported to the site before the process of softening/moulding took place? It's how we use cement.

[@Nicoslast]

Fallen angel technology. They had children also known as giants see genesis 6

[@MechanicalMooCow]

@@Nicoslast LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

[@Nicoslast]

@@MechanicalMooCow have you heard the saying; truth is stranger than fiction?

[@reverseuniverse2559]

They would not be able to get the precision creation of stone if it were not hard also if it were softer it would compress over time and crack and decay

[@cutsrosescents4950]

Again wooly mammoth dung is the ancient secret geopolymer

[@bangaloreindia]

What I can imagine as "one of the possibility among many", is that there were some huge boneless intelligent creatures ruled the earth in ancient times which left no traces of them. Like giant octopus or giant amoeba.. They had ability to dissolve or cut the stone using their tentacles... There could also be a possibility of that human or non-human "civilization" to have ability to direct the flowing lava of active and slow volcano (like in Hawaii) to fill-build the pre-Inca walls...

[@MrVanhovey]

Interesting theory. Perhaps some type of sonic tool was used to make the rock malleable.

[@disklamer]

You have it all backwards, these building are from the future.

[@paulnielsen1446]

Mankind, in its present day mode of linear thinking and stark materialism, will likely never come to understand the superior constructions of our ancestors. Psychedelics offer the true path forward. “The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” - Nikola Tesla

[@latifquest5363]

Our ancestors ?

[@paulnielsen1446]

@@latifquest5363 You're right, that's a good point: they very well may not have been our ancestors...

[@jondoe2099]

Even if you could manipulate it like cheese, it still weighs the same...

[@drtydawg73]

love this vid! I have thought the same for many years, I personally thing they did change the stone somehow to be soft and I think it could be something connected with the ability they had to make heavy stone defy gravity too.

[@cbrucesbiz]

Here's the fact. Anyone can see, no evidence has been found to support the copper tools or harder rock tool could do the type of shaping found in this vid. I have studied this for several years and a scooping tool of a kind MUST be the partial answer. The fact that it's clear a scooping type of tool was used, in so many places, around the world that it gives proving evidence to the melting or softening of the stone theory. Now it may not be the entire stone was softened. May be contact area of the tool was the only effected part of the stone. I do have to say I have notices may stones with bumps, protrusions, perhaps contact points that may have been used to move a charge through, but that's just a early working idea. Now,...We must remember this is just part of the story. A method had to be at hand to easily lift and place the stones with an ease that would allow them no restriction to envision any structures size they desired. Residence frequency seems a good road to travel and others are surely to be followed so do your research and report. Keep asking questions. The answers are somewhere too be found.

[@rikirikibis]

The scooping tool could be a pneumatic hammer with a large flat chisel. The marks are very similar. Then 10.000 years of erosion would have made them look like smooth and rounded scooping marks.

[@drveritystrange-fish4685]

More inane drivel. There is no indication at all that a moulding process was used here. Moulds are used to reproduce things over and over, identically. And what would those moulds be made from anyway. It is immediately evident looking at this video that ordinaary stoneworking techniques were used, as always. If you don't know how things are made: in fact if you have no frigging idea of any industrial processes, ancient or modern, please stick to gawping in awe at what ancient man had all day and every day to achieve - probably under the threat of summary violence - before inventing vapid theories to explain why you can't comprehend the sophistication of a long gone stone age culture. The only reasonable thing here is the music!

[@MechanicalMooCow]

Dr Verity Strange-Fish not all moulds are reusable. Many casts are one-shot, and could have easily, in these instances, have been made for this one task. That's if you even consider moulding, and not softening as this video claims.

[@terryhale9006]

It's unfortunate that so many people have to believe that our ancestors had to have been less intelligent than us. People also fail to realize what can be built with persistence and dedication. No, it would be completely impossible to melt granite and shape it as it would recrystallize into something with much smaller grains. No, heating limestone until it became moldable would not leave you with limestone.

[@TheKevphil]

Since several people put forth a more prosaic explanation for how ancient Egyptians worked with granite (yet were oddly reluctant to supply "proof"), here is a link to a PBS NOVA article describing methods which were likely used: www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/obelisk/cutting.html This does not explain *_everything_* presented in the video, of course, but *_does_* provide some basic strategies for cutting granite in the ancient world.

[@WINDOWS94198]

did you consider the possibilities of elongated skulls

[@cb81965]

Miguel, your response to Kevin simply changes the subject. The PBS link seems to provide answers to some of the questions. And it does so without "E.T." or "giants". -- The simplest explanation is usually the most likely.

[@stephenrraible3765]

To date the stone work has never been systematically duplicated to prove any theories it is a lost technology terrestrial or not

[@mysterioussquirrel4456]

Wet sand is very abrasive and could have been employed to grind the stone.

[@wheelmanstan]

It's pretty simple, if they couldn't melt stone or soften it then they developed a cement that was so ingenious that it comes across as stone today. But if you're making stones casts and building monuments that need hundreds and even thousands of them then you would think we would see a pattern and jig to drastically speed up production. But they're all different, all different size. And people might chock it up to artistic expression but most of these stone walls look more practical than artistic. Their lines don't necessarily flow into each other and look as if different eyes laid each stone. Some stone looks like they were softened and sculpted into position, some is even vitrified, while others are clearly the product of very impressive machining. The serapeum boxes, puma punku h-blocks, that elephantine island stone "booth" for example. They were so good at it that they were show-offs with it. And they even had machine tolerances, for what? I think some cultures used a chemical to soften the edges and faces of the rough chiseled stone and once laid into place their weight did the rest. Others had giant machines as we not only see the overcuts and tool feed striations but we even see areas where stone was removed from rock faces like blocks of butter. They could cut stone like a 3-d printer blazes through plastic. You see the nodules on the soft appearing stone and that could occur when removing the wood beam that helped put it in place, the suction pulls some of the material outward upon removal (just a theory). Other stones have sharp inside corners and the list of impressiveness goes on and on. There were probably quite a few very advanced civilizations that have come and gone, died or left, and we're just another that thinks we're too big to fail. We'll probably leave behind the Panama Canal and Washington Monument and the next modern men will be scratching their heads about it like we scratch our heads about the Great Pyramid and Sphinx. And by the time they see the Forefathers faces they might be shaped into grizzly bear faces by then...who knows.

[@danielboland5523]

+wheelmanstan The irregular interlocking of the stones make them less prone to coming loose in an earthquake. this is a fact only discovered by "modern Man" in recent years.

[@wheelmanstan]

Daniel Boland yep

[@diannaskare7829]

lol all of the above? it seems when including the ancient red polymer found and the melted shear cliffs in some quarries, stones , etc.... it seems they could do it all ! Very Exciting!!!

[@rikirikibis]

What about a 3rd option: the developed some serious stone shaping machinery like the ones used in Egypt for the pyramids? It the pre-egyptian civilization could cut 60 tons granite blocks and move them almost 70 meters high with incredible accuracy, less than 0,1 mm every 10 meters, than shaping blocks to build walls should have been pretty easy.

[@duckpuddles]

Perhaps they found this special bonding material which would act like cement on all types of sand, they would mix it up and put it in a bag of linen or animal skin so it would mould perfectly into the shape of the blocks already cast. The bulge shape of the walls in Peru and the knobs where perhaps the liquid drained out maybe evidence of this. The other possibility is that by removing the cloth when it is half cured it would be easy to cut with simple tools, eventually hardening to leave us with the impression that they must have had greater tool technology than they actually had.

[@Zophim314]

Nobody ever seems to ask the rather obvious question: If these people had "highly advanced technology", why use stone in the first place? Why not use exotic alloys, plastics, kevlar, or carbon fiber, etc.. The evidence points not so much to high technology, but the presence of beings with a good supply of brute force and time.... like Nephilim, which we have evidence of for example, using simple levers and mechanical advantage, which is a technology more consistent with all the evidence.

[@annaluca761]

I wondered the same. If (!) there was any highly advanced civilization before us probably they used other materials too, BUT based on scientists speculations STONES are the ONLY things that would remain after humanity disappear. See the "Life After People" documentary that actually concluds only the Pyramids and the wall of China would survive for millions of years (covered by plants sand though). No man made material remain forever...only constructions made of stone which is made by nature itself we just reshape it. (sorry for my English)

[@JDsModernMartialArts]

Zophim314 it may have something to do with stone being so durable and available

[@Alamyst2011]

budcat7 Ever kind of metal or alloy does NOT eventually break down. Not in the time frame that humans have been around, nor the Earth. You are wrong there. Mainstream science can tell you with almost exact precision when the first alloys were smelted, as the carbon was sent into the atmosphere and collected in ice core samples. So you are wrong there. The fact that natural occurring alloys have been found near Volcanoes seems to suggest that people learned about alloys by accident. You are wrong there. Ancient people were actually smarter than us, because in each successive generation we lose DNA. This means we lose traits each generation as we solidify which traits to pass on. Some ancient people may have been widely smarter than us. So you are wrong there. And everything from earthbeforflood is subject to lies and misinformation. Someone is selling you a fairy tale as truth so they can fill their pocket book.

[@al2207]

if you had technology like aliens it is more easy to carry construction equipment than 100,000 tons of metal . Granite and hard stone are readily available on any planet if you had technology to shape and transport and they will outlast any modern material

[@budcat7]

Alamyst2011 What scientists can tell you, which ones? Can you give me the link to that. Maybe the lying sack of shit scientists from the Smithsonian huh? Your not talking about the "scientists" who contribute to the dumbed down State approved textbooks for elementary school students where you might learn about something like "metallurgy". Far as I know it is questionable where the roots of metallurgy are in the timeline according to some mainstream scientists and historians who question it, I'm not just pulling it out of my ass. LAH Russia researchers did their own study of this if I remember correctly. All metal oxidizes eventually with few exceptions but anything made of steel or iron will eventually disappear and most of our buildings are built with this material. Doesn't seem likely that buildings were made of giant blocks of gold or silver. Mainstream History (choke) Channel has even had their own mainstream scientists say that even a city like NYC would be completely consumed by the Earth in 10,000 years and that theory seems reasonable considering what happened to the Twin Towers in seconds. What about cities that are much older than that? What would be left of them? Not much apparently due to the scarcity of historical cities mainstream science agrees upon.

[@mvtelectra]

I believe they used Geopolymers. The mixture was "worked" as it hardened. I also believe that some sites were naturally in a "semi-soft" state at the time they were crafted.

[@maziel2]

People think it was advance technology involved but what if science is just wrong and the time the megalithic constructions were build in, the "todays" solid material was half soft like a clay and it took relatively long time to get hard? This would explain similarity with technics and time in history when they all were erected in many places on the globe .we need to investigate things again and rewrite history. we dont need making up theories about ancient aliens or advanced technologies in ancient world. Maybe geological crust of earth was going through big changes not so long ago like the mainstream archaeology and history is telling us.

[@billwilson3665]

This guy claims the sun novas every 12,600 years producing extreme heat. Maybe it takes awhile for the rock to cool and harden. kzbin.info/door/jBe55XpYzc0HzkK-8lgQtA .

[@benbrown2470]

Thanks. Lovely pictures.

[@mexcanfun4498]

A rotting banana makes concrete soft . It makes it white and soft like calcium.

[@nigelking1559]

Awesome video! Mind boggling. Thankyou for posting this.

[@billarcher7172]

This is beautiful….well done!

[@dougs7367]

1:00 those blocks kind of remind me of the H-blocks at Puma Punku

[@thethoughtczar]

Years ago I was at lunch with 3 other guys and we were talking about what an idiot Bob was. Then my friend Chuck said, “But, what if he is right?” I don’t rule out any

[@randyjohnson805]

I don't know why . but I love the music

[@relentlessmadman]

cool music, relaxing, the first stone in egypt looks precision milled some stones look hand carved alot look poured or molded!

[@WLUP1]

If the stones were so soft and for example they built these structures to keep the enemy out, how could they keep them out if the enemy could themselves drill or cut stones into them and get inside and kill them? These stones were not soft stones these stones were cut by electricity they had back in the pyramids. Look up how the pyramids were used for electricity not for burial whatsoever. Batteries were found in Bagdad Iraq and we today use the same design. They had cutting tools just like what we have today and don't let anyone fool you into believing otherwise. Even marble requires cutting tools and these cut you see on these stones are perfect lines and squares and cut a chisel you will never get perfect anything as you would with a cutting tool like a band saw and chainsaw or router or all these other saws we use today. Where do you think we go the idea for these saws from, they found these tools in caves, pyramids and in the earth. Look at the quarries in places were the pyramids of most countries have pyramids by the way, in China, Japan, Norway, all over Europe they are just hidden and they you know who they are don't want you to know about this. Look up stone structures all over the world. In France they have stone structures all over and they are everywhere in the world but kept hushed up. Giants built these structures and the technology was then as it is today but discovered as man dug the earth and went into the caves and the pyramids all over the earth and there you have it. The Bible says that there is nothing new under the sun Another thing is how did these stones get stacked on top of each other weighing hundreds of tons? Come on people man can only lift so much in a space the width of a man and these structures are far to much tonnage for your normal man to have ever lifted. Read the Book of Enoch to see where these giants came from and even the Bible mentions the giants in Numbers chapter 13 verses 30-40 and Samson and King David and even Moses killed giants. Be not deceived by the lies of man and seek truth in all things. All things.

[@intriguingmegalithicperspe1764]

Between the 'Scoop' marks found globally and the obviously somehow softened stones of Peru, isn't it obvious that certain stones can be softened? The secret is in the kinds of stone that we find with scoop marks and used in the polygonal walls. Basalt, Granite, Limestone,, is it the quartz?