The Most Controversial Tank In War Thunder

[@Spookston]

Install Mech Arena for Free - IOS/ANDROID/PC: clcr.me/Spookston_MA and get a special starter pack - Available only for the next 30 days #ad

[@PogChamper]

fking mobile game lmao

[@familyjobe853]

Can you Do how Bad was the isu 152/obj. 269 and play the strv 42 m TD please ?

[@urielOrnstein]

Get that bag cuz.

[@redtsar]

Just a fair warning if people are going to play Mech Arena It's extremely Pay to Win All the new mechs, weapons, and pilots are locked behind paywalls, no way to earn them It is fun, but way more P2W than WT haha

[@nanni-buyerofcopper]

I ain't gonna play it, but I respect the grindset

[@Spookston]

Obligatory "Spookston try not to make an HSTV-L video challenge (Impossible)"

[@llaammeerr2506]

Hey spookston, Try a triathalon for things like the hstvl, 2s38, (pt-76-57?) etc

[@jaidenlopez9032]

indeed my friend, indeed…

[@Katask0p0]

On the other hand, I would trust you with talking about it and assess its place in the game, so thanks for that!

[@matthewramirez6896]

Hey spook. Will ypu play the abrams tusk?

[@Dacy_man]

That was like more than 1 year ago

[@Spaceballz123]

The hstv-l is a great example of gaijin bias. Hstv-l sits at 11.0 with a penetration of 269 with 26 rounds while the 2s38 sits at 9.7 penetration of 221 with 148 rounds, proximity rounds, and irst tracking.

[@curtsauce3947]

Better thermals too

[@Horizon_333]

It's premium bias.. if it was German or American it would have had a similar treatment (like the turm 3, it's pretty nasty at 8.0). idk how the 2s is still at that br tho like fr

[@armyguy588]

@@Horizon_333 As its 50$. Premium bias is SUPER real, and this is the latest case. I still remember when the GR.1 was 9.7 or the Sea Hawk Mk.100 down there at 8.0 with A2A missiles

[@drytishuuz]

premium bias, half the premiums sit at 9.7 so if it was 11.0 that would require it to not be premium or sm

[@disturbedwaffle327]

But slower with worse protection and worse depression. (Though it still deserves to go up, and before any of you say that I'm a wallet warrior who doesn't want it to go because I want to be op, I don't own it) also side note I love how everyone cries saying russia is op while Sweden and other nations have blatantly overpowered premiums such as the cv90105, you all need to quit your hypocrisy.

[@antiheldd.3081]

Shots 1-5: Clearly missed. Shots 6-9: Missed due to recoil (bad spray control). Shots 10-11: Very close, but recoil and inaccuracy make these reasonable misses.

[@hunlepto2239]

Shot 12: Didn't happen, because u were already dead

[@Dennis-vm6lu]

TarkovMaxxing

[@thebiggeststarwarsfan6635]

Shots 12-13: didn’t even fire, you were dead already

[@sarunotaslt]

Spookston gets warthunder'd

[@glitterlich]

@@Dennis-vm6lu this is a CSGO meme (originally)

[@Martin-ot6kw]

That bit about the devs going "Well we think" despite evidence to the contrary seems a theme with most people I know talking about their own experience bug reporting. Supposedly a similiar bit about MANPADs with them saying they can't be that agile because they're smaller than Sidewinders and other missiles. Per example.

[@Gary_The_Metro]

Gaijin: Provide documented proof of vehicle inaccuracy or we won't fix it Playerbase: *provides proof* gaijin: "I'm gonna pretend I didn't see that." Reminds me of sherman smoke launchers... It's been 7? years now? There have been tons and tons and TONS of bug reports. stating that at the very least all 76mm m4a2 and m4a3 variants should have smoke launchers. (and arguably, all except maybe the m4a1 variant? but I might be mistaken on that) Yet with the exception of a few specific cases, no shermans have smoke launchers. Despite all the documented proof that was given to gaijin. And it's not even like they're saying it's inaccurate or something. No from all the reports I've seen gaijin just intentionally ignores them. Like outright not replying to it not marking it as not a bug/looked into etc. Just literally ignoring it. Meanwhile a poorly sourced report comes in about supposedly the m4a3 76 having a significantly slower turret traverse? less than a month after it was a posted it was included in the patch that followed. And this was while they were also still ignoring all the bug reports about the m4a3 having 500 hp instead of 450. So yea. Thanks gaijin.

[@morva4498]

@@Gary_The_Metro It all seems to be against USA in particular.

[@yolesanedrac9406]

@Gary_The_Metro Don't forget the T14, which ACTUALLY HAS THE SMOKE LAUNCHER HOLE MODELED yet doesn't get it.

[@isodifbrakiul6387]

Honestly is it shocking that people end up getting so frustrated that they leak classified materials on the forums when the Devs are like this? Its entirely a self made problem and will one day end up getting Gaijin in serious hot water unless they actually start listening to declassified materials and give no reason to post classified documents.

[@casematecardinal]

@@Gary_The_Metro the 75 a2 has it. Which I find strange. But its basically useless because unlike most other smoke launchers, it launches 100 feet in the air and basically makes the thing useless

[@teatanks6481]

Gaijin: Refuses to change the HSTVL ammo despite having overwhelming evidence proving them wrong Also Gaijin: buffs Russian tanks with zero sources or reason

[@exsplosivecake9064]

Russian bias...

[@laszlomiskei9138]

Russian copium game :)

[@FirstDagger]

War Thunder community: Russian bias isn't real

[@cookiecracker2]

That's proof of bias right there.

[@L.Chitabu]

Playerbase: Why don't you back it up with a source Gayjim: My source is that I made it the fuck up

[@falfill2096]

Imagine if they added the STRV 2000 into the game, basically a cross between an HSTV-L, CV90 with a 140mm gun, it would probably break top tier but it would be so cool to see it

[@sillylittleowlguy2392]

Stridsvagn male grindset

[@viperz3r016]

Didn't it have a 40mm coaxial

[@theboreditamar2108]

@@viperz3r016 one of the versions did have, but only a mocup was built of this version. the version that was built was the 2 carts conected in a strange way one

[@masterolof138]

@@theboreditamar2108 That is not the strv 2000 its a completely different vehicle in the UDES program, the UDES XX20

[@minigunuser25]

Imagine if it wasn't just a paper tank

[@fusilier3029]

Honestly, your XM885 Rant section basically proves the whole reason why so many classified documents keep on getting leaked... Frankly, I'm going to start blaming the developers if it happens again, since it is pretty ridiculous that they won't listen to legal and practical research, causing people to go to such lengths...

[@SpiritOfMontgomery]

My thoughts exactly. No wonder people keep doing it, because that’s effectively what they’re being asked to provide as proof/evidence, even though they’ve already cited all open source documentation which the snail says “no, not good enough” to.

[@bickboose9364]

People need to understand that no matter how much proof you provide it's never enough for the greedy thickheaded suits at Gaijin.

[@infiniminer7677]

>gaijin is a russian company >devs conveniently screw up tank stats and their playerbase does the dirty work of digging up classified documents from other militaries to get better stats for their tank game i think it's pretty obvious why the devs do it

[@dergunter1237]

you could also thank the devs for that, all those classified documents, its beautiful

[@davidnelson2464]

If you told me WT was a PsyOp to leak classified military documents to a 3rd Party via Whistleblower anonymity regularly to do an entire intelligence agency's department job passively by "encouraging" only 100% factual/actual information to feed to your government handler.. I'd call them insane but probably true.

[@hqwefg]

OK here's what I don't get: Gaijin gaslights the playerbase into thinking it needs classified documents for bug reports, like the exact dimensions of the penetrator like you mentioned, and then acts surprised when the playerbase leaks classified documents.... Like they literally ask for it. Maybe if they actually listened to players and didn't require you to sneak into the Pentagon for bug reports THIS WOULDN'T HAPPEN!

[@pax6833]

Also when it comes to Russian tanks some light whining gets their soft stats buffed. Like T-80 being quiet and most of them having carousel ammo that rarely detonates.

[@fire_drake12.arc.24]

@@pax6833 Russia legitimately gets buffs with zero sources provided and they just never say anything about it, it just happens.

[@realhebplus1871]

@@pax6833 or when you hit it, it either phases through or yellows for some reason but any other nation if 1 pubic hair length of shrapnel passes by within 2.3 micrometers it explodes with a yield equivalent to Krakatoa

[@realhebplus1871]

@@fire_drake12.arc.24 yea they kinda sweep it under the rug, or if they do mention it in the load up screen they'll say "YeA We MadE soMe TweAks 🤓"

[@mirroredvoid8394]

I believe gaijin is secretly a intelligence agency funded by the russian government. they know there is going to be weirdos that get triggered by pixel tanks and are willing give away their actual freedom and years of their life to change a number on a screen.

[@binkycatfish]

That Face When 2S38 is 1.3 BR lower than the HSTV-L, while being equally good if not better

[@dabu55ify]

Gaijin: but mah statistiks comrade ))

[@socialist_elmo]

higher rof and aphe too :))

[@milosmilictrob2046]

2S38 cannot bounce some shots that should have been pens.

[@ShinyRIS]

@@milosmilictrob2046 except it does

[@masau8672]

I mean, I always bounce the front plate of the HSTV-L with the 125mm guns, I hate that thing, it's true that the 2S38 should be higher but the HSTV-L is slightly better considering it's angled armor, low profile and better speed

[@kadebass6187]

The physics around destructible objects is wild. You’ll see videos of tanks going over cars with barely an issue (losing 5-10kmh of speed) and then when you do it in the same tank you lose half if not more of your speed

[@TransGirlGaming]

Lose all your speed, break your tracks and somehow kill your commander

[@IvanTre]

It really depends on the mass of the tank. Also, I'm fairly sure you only ever lose track condition hitting non-destructible objects.

[@Fiasco3]

Seems like some mundane items/terrain have been left coded as indestructible. I've seen a 50ton MBT blocked by a wooden table.

[@chef95rus]

Dont forget about Japanese concrete fence on Japan map, it's still indestructible as always (unless you run it over, cuz it literally eats rounds for breakfast)

[@tiv_2222]

Don't even get me started about the trees with 9 lives 🥲. I shot a tree too many times with m82 and it just kept popping back up!

[@Hosenfuhrer]

11:00 Gaijin: "Don't send us confidential documents" Also Gaijin: "Get exact cartridge dimensions from the military"

[@johndavidson4127]

I agree that this is not a bad tank. However the thing is that even when you are on the top of the skill celling - your performance would be still HEAVILY dependent on random. Current state XM885 should mean "inconsistancy" in any language around the world. You simply cannot rely on it. One time it will one-shot BVM at 1000 meters other time it won't set off the ammo that was directly hit from 50 meters. Every shot is like rolling a dice.

[@ross7872]

11:56 Spookston: So you want unclassified documents from the military Gaijin: Yes Spookston: but you don’t want unclassified documents from the military Gaijin: Yes Spookston: *visible confusion*

[@athenajayvieljerios8343]

*Confused K-9 noises*

[@morva4498]

Hey Spookston you should play the 2S38 and compare the two vehicles.

[@thcfck6870]

I play top tier US quite often and I must say that I relegated the HSTV-L to one of my last spawns, it's just so painfully inconsistent having to hit sometimes multiple times a single crew member, or just not penetrating at all breech areas or common weakspots due to the anemic shell, extremely painful.

[@Dragonwolf920]

Gas turbine engines: known for being more silent compared to turbodiesel engine Gaijin's world: loudest engine in the game

[@Feanor6450]

They are louder but higher pitched, which I believe means the sound doesn't travel as well.

[@normallymute0131]

Loud at 1-2km, silent beyond

[@pumapandora1310]

I just gotta mention it. I ALWAYS wait eagerly for your videos. You put them online around my dinner time and I love just watching them when eating so much that I sometimes wait a bit just in case or keep videos unwatched for a while so I can get food. Idk what it is, I don’t even play war thunder, but something about your content is just incredibly entertaining. Thank you

[@DrJorusUploads]

You should play the Italian M41M 90/53. Weird chassis but the gun is simply a joy to shoot.

[@sirnigel4332]

I’m getting it very soon, I can’t wait to play a tank with a really good gun for once in Italy,

[@tritipguy9325]

My favorite tank by far

[@finnthewastebin1503]

Its honestly an amazing tank for many reasons. The fact that most of the crew is on the ground makes it very good

[@IShallNotFall]

I love how you're slowly creeping closer and closer to meme thunder channels while still maintaining this level headed educational information delivery from you're old videos.

[@Predator20357]

Learning that they refuse almost all the sources you sent them makes me realize why Classified documents are being leaked, they are essentially asking for classified documents or they’ll shove their heads in the dirt and go “Sorry, not a bug report”

[@CheezeSpartan]

Spook went from videos on why tanks > mech to getting sponsored by mech games Truly one of the character arcs of all time

[@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830]

I don't think he actually even played it, or much anyway. Just said what would make the sponsors happy and that he likes the vehicle from the video they gave lmao

[@fernandomarques5166]

During the XM885 rant I could feel that sadness in his voice that no one had leaked the M774 documents on the forum C'mon WT forums do your thing!

[@Dinozavr210]

Spookston, I may be damned by almost every other viewer of yours, but I really enjoyed listening your rant-monologue about hstvl round. Would like to hear more in this kind of style of live gaming and semi discussion with proofs and suggestions, imo, actually pretty chill, thank you!

[@cinnamonoa]

2S38 is 9.7 and isn't just a fast firing light tank, it's also an AA with a 57mm proxy shell and IRST

[@skyrimn00b98]

Yet they have the gual to make the HSTVL 11.0. 9 times out of 10, the 2s38 will kill you if you see each other at the same time.

[@robrob3325]

@@skyrimn00b98 yep

[@fire_drake12.arc.24]

with superior survivability to the HSTV-L as well.

[@tankistrazumist]

hstvl is much faster, better armored, better gun depression. hstvl should be 10.3. 2s38 it's ok on 9.7. And US has proxy AA on 9.0. so what?

[@skyrimn00b98]

@TankistRazumist Typical vatnik apologist. Let's go point by point. The HSTVL is faster, but it's only by 10kmh. This is not a wide enough gap in performance to warrant a BR gap you are describing. The argument of armor is honesty hilarious considering just how little this matters when facing 600 mm pen kinetic rounds and HEAT warheads with pen in the 800 to 900 mm range. The HSTVL needs a buff, not a downtier. It had anti aircraft capabilites and it needs its faster reload that it does not have in the game. XM855 is also underperforming by quite a bit. Its pen is about 100 less than it should be(there's multiple documents saying it has similar penetration to M774), and its spalling is laughable, to say the least. The 2s38 with it's gen 3 thermals and IRST helicopter and jet deleting capability should be at 10.0 or 10.3. The M3A3 Bradley and Puma should also be buffed and moved up to a similar BR. As for the BMP-2M, it should 10.0, no buff needed. Lastly, you alluded to the Sargent York. This is a decent AA system, but severely lacks the flexibility of the 2S38 fucking miles. Kick Rocks

[@ArrivingPit]

Sorry if this has been asked before but would you be interested in covering some more of Sweden's tanks in depth, such as the Ikv 91 or the U-SH 405?

[@logannicholson1850]

If they fixed the post pen dmg it would be great

[@GraceFoulques]

Spookston going out of their way to dig up as much information about the HSTV-L to the point of getting in touch with the government and creating an eleven page document of how it can be improved in-game is more than worthy of respect.

[@nicolassanchez1194]

0:04 HSTV-L in the most spookston voice possible

[@FatherGrigori]

I'm glad to see another hstvl video, it's my favorite light tank by far in wt

[@FatherGrigori]

Could be better though :(

[@johncee853]

@@FatherGrigori Every single vehicle in game "could be better.".

[@PablitoAndCo]

-"Duh just aim for weakspots." My shot disappearing after slightly grazing a 5mm side skirt while shooting one: "I may not mean nothing to y'all".

[@cybernetic_crocodile8462]

It is hard to believe, but... Spookston loved HSTV-L. Also, would make a video about M4A3 105?

[@firestarteronyoutube5542]

8:04 that rev up the bugatti made my day😂

[@kauangarcia9236]

0:53 I'm happy with 3 kills in a top tier match because I get too nervous and my brain chooses not to work

[@Cyberboi]

Gaijin has the actual worst people on the forums, I submitted a report years ago for the Canberra Mk 6 regarding payloads and flight characteristics with 5 sources and they said it wasn't enough, I added a few more and the same guy rejected it. I still hate Smin1080p to this day.

[@tristandaries1129]

“Hey, we saw you wanted this document of a declassified round of a gun that was never put into production, but even though we said it’s declassified, we’re still not giving it to you” - US Military

[@NovaNeedsTherapy]

I use the 2S38, and sometimes i just can't help but laugh at how ridiculous it is after parading right into their team while taking 120mm apfsds to the ammo and watching it go right through the other end

[@twiggledy5547]

The T-series ammo hit without detonation is just **chef's kiss**

[@RustyDroid]

5:03 Well, since you said it and not us...something something furries, something something foxes

[@thekringe4387]

Can we all agree that it is so satisfying to kill tanks with Zs on them?

[@snilipp5]

It happens again..

[@jdawwwgytb]

Reevvv up that Bugatti urreeee😂😂😂 8:00

[@spartanx9293]

I think 10.7 would be a good battle rating for it a lineup with the m1a1 and ipm1 and pretty constant down tiers thanks to the turms and Leo 2a4

[@C0MMAND3R_ZER0]

The thing on the bug report about the ammunition, you can pull a "Freedom of information act" with the U.S. Government.

[@thegamemingk4933]

12:40 I am starting to genuinly believe thescottishkoala in ehat he said in his "I quit" video.

[@juliopedrogasparetovigollo706]

Yeah thats what got me out of top tier battles. You shoot russian breeches, they dont receive any damage, you shoot their guns, volumetric says otherwise. But the thing that definitely upsets me the most is the era. Totally unpredictable, making it unfair. I had kontakt1 eat m829a2 from my abrams, from a flat side shot. This is such an outrageous thing that I was forced to leave toptier for good.

[@i8yourDog]

Can't wait for Spookston to release classified documents to give his HSTV-L the M774 penetration values and faster reload...

[@edl617]

The HSTV-L was a remarkably small and light vehicle. The hull was roughly 19.38 feet (5.91 meters) in length, 9.15 feet (2.79 meters) in width, and the vehicle was 7.91 feet (2.41 meters) tall. With applique armor installed, the HSTV-L weighed 22 US tons (19.95 tonnes). The HSTV-L’s upper front plate was angled at 80 degrees. It was believed that this extreme angle, in conjunction with the HSTV-L’s special applique armor, would protect it from 115 mm rounds used by the Soviet T-62 Needs better ammo

[@thebiggeststarwarsfan6635]

At around 13:53 I SWEAR TO GOD I heard a little bit of Surfin’ Bird. Was that intentional or just a sound leak?

[@Spookston]

You did

[@thebiggeststarwarsfan6635]

@@Spookston sick

[@kaan_3516]

I fucking admire your edits. Just a fraction of a second. Flawless. Always on time.

[@TJ042]

My issue with the HSTV-L’s balancing is that the comparable Russian vehicle has both a lower BR and it’s proper fire rate. The HSTV-L should be slinging shells just as quickly.

[@Jp-ki6pz]

bro i love your content so much, didnt know war thunder exist until last month and im just loving it here in your channel, i could watch 20 videos a day easily, keep it up bro :)

[@Slowrider8]

Just wanna point out that the tank at 14:38 had the turret facing completely perpendicular to you but somehow when it fired it still hit

[@Fiasco3]

Happens alot have been trying to work out if this is a delayed graphics glitch or a hack. I'm starting to think it is bot code.

[@SSVX]

Have you tried the Japanese Type 89 in a capture point? It gets infinite ammo, replenish faster than uses

[@zerrierslizer1]

the HSTV-L, from what i can tell from how i and many other play it, and it's overall characteristics, it is an incredible Ambush Vehicle. it is relatively low in height, and thus can be effectively used to basically hide in a Ditch and then open fire on multiple vehicles once thye have passed. use it for Ambushes and Scouting, or to kill crippled targets quickly to help alleviate the focus on a singular target for your team, and you WILL do well almost every match as long as the entire Team isnt AFK.

[@skyrimn00b98]

Can we please talk about the turret ring on the HSTVL? It seems like every round I survive, which is unlikely to begin with, my turret ring is destroyed. This means that I will most likely die on the second shot.

[@normallymute0131]

Literally me in every Abrams. You could side pen perpendicular to my engine/transmission from point blank so there’s no deviation and somehow my turret ring dies, I’ve had shots that went straight through my driver’s feet (lowest possible pen point so nowhere near the turret) and my turret ring would be knocked out. If I survive the first shot, my turret ring will be broken and I cannot fight back. Also tried to turret ring a type 10 with M829A1…non-fucken-pen

[@SilentButDudley]

It’s a 10.7 tank. Yet, so is the 2S38. Spalling needs to be changed for cannons using APFSDS that are 60mm to 90mm, since it is nonexistent.

[@gentlemangeoff1023]

what I've noticed about apfsds and russian top tier tank breaches is that apfsds does NOT like to go through even if you are using very good apfsds but when it comes to heatfs it goes right through and takes the breach

[@furtado.g_]

Spookston: I won’t do good with this vehicle Also Spookston: *Gets 10 kills and a nuke every match with the vehicle*

[@GoldRaven-oe4by]

Basically full auto apcr

[@popinmo]

they should make it accurate to its real specs since the 2s38 exist

[@aidanacebo9529]

if you're an HSTVL fan, check out the original 1980s G.I. Joe series, the Mauler MBT that the joes use in their fight against Cobra is a laser HSTVL. they also made a 3-3/4 inch figure scale toy HSTVL that was motorized and awesome, in 1985.

[@hammersam75]

Military docs that are unclassed usually means that the manufacturer of said unclassed material is can and sometimes will give the desired information to potential buyers

[@tomthenot9786]

I recently got and spaded the HSTV-L it was a bit of a pain because the round is so awful. Btw Spookston i love your videos and the way you format them i also genuinly find youre voice rather calm. Keep up the great work!

[@epsiloneridani4638]

honestly love this tank, too bad it's going to take me years to get it, realize it's horrible, or find another tank that interests me 😦

[@Tetrazole]

I know you've said you're not into academics, but your devotion to researching something as mundane as the characteristics of a dart on a prototype test bed that never got anywhere near production... and then writing multiple lengthy documents presenting compiled evidence with unique conclusions, you're basically doing the same work that a graduate student in a history program is doing at any notable graduate research university in the US. It's impressive.

[@CrniWuk]

Player : Here, look at this data, it should be so-and-so. Gajin : Hmmm. Yeah. That's fine. But could you get them from Area 51?

[@rafaelzigx]

What about the lack of spalling on russian tanks? i saw a video of you saying you'd make some enquiries about it to Gaijin. But I never seen an answer about that.

[@Spookston]

I never got an answer :)

[@juri8723]

is not a bug, is a feature komrad!

[@user-fg6mq3dg3d]

It's a propaganda buff

[@hamoojamoo3145]

Opinion on the .8 sec reload

[@Spookston]

Would be nice but I think damage and penetration should take priority

[@DuckWithLongLegs]

14:03 he says a no-no word, nice knowing you spook

[@lucy_002-ONI]

i love this channel! its just such a mess of serious journalism, gameplay, educational content and rants and its always a blast

[@honeybadgerbomb4469]

"Which isn't really required for any other vehicle" The bug reports for the Leclerc:

[@blumpfreyfranks8863]

Could you play the 8.3 BMP-2. I find it pretty fun at its BR.

[@matheff71]

Spawn camping gang already here and the video barely spawned!

[@jaidenlopez9032]

on god (totally not me)

[@FrozenxDeath]

Gaijin: Stop leaking classified military documents Also Gaijin: better leak classified military documents if you want to prove we should fix a glaring problem

[@jasonfike4548]

Okay the quiet Surfin' Bird when you looked back to see the napalm really sent me.

[@manyhack9685]

"the document that proves it pens that much is unclassified but they wont release it" the warthunder community:we'll see about that

[@JerichoTheBeagle]

Gaijin bug report team: "No, reliable sources aren't good enough. You need to give me intimately detailed information to satisfy my back-of-a-napkin math about how I think it should perform." Gaijin PR: HURRR HOW COME PEOPLE KEEP SENDING US SECRETS!?!?!?!

[@Ghent_Halcyon]

Agreed, the double standard that a 120mm that has a 4 second reload (pretty sure it is actually supposed to be a 3 second reload) is fine but a 75mm can't have a lower reload even though it doesn't even do any damage. I wish it was possible to just hack an update into WT that fixes stuff.

[@assassin67904]

Spookston: flies through the air Tree: Abso-fucking-lutely not

[@brettleisy356]

For the argument on the pen, the VCC 80/60 in the Italian line which I would consider the earlier version of the HSTV-L has a 60mm where the HSTVL has a 75mm. now just cause its a larger caliber doesn't mean anything... what does matter is the kinetic energy of the rounds. the HSTV-L has 2.4 Million Joules of energy, the VCC 80/60 only has 1.14 million Joules so the energy on the HSTV-L round is well over double the VCC 80/60. doesn't mean double the penetration... but should be more than the 10% increase you get 2.3 BR higher.

[@digitalanalog9938]

"The HSTV-L is a hairline away from being overpowered" Meanwhile other tanks at its br: avereage hits to kill 1

[@ryancrazy1]

i had to shoot T seriies tank from the front. was penning his LFP and was directly hitting his ammo rack. took 6 shots before it finally blew up. The ammo just got darker and darker each shot... its was crazy

[@JSDFEnthusiast]

15:48 What the army means by an air transportable tank *throws it off a cliff with a chute and some air brakes I'd love to see a Leopard 2PL video because personally I love said vehicle. Everyone complained about it being a squad vehicle straight to top tier understandably but now it's kinda just left in the background behind the AIM and Swedish T-80.

[@Tamburahk]

thats just typical gaijin when you want to bug report something. They always know "better" just like last QA: "We wont add Hellfire L because it can track through smoke, which would be OP" (as if they cannot make it not to track through smoke right) meanwhile we have Vikhr in game lol

[@user-dq7tv2lr2o]

I love the halo nostalgia that you have been adding in lately.

[@aidenfredrick7281]

*me whose been stuck at 6.3 since sl and xp update* 13:00

[@KiithnarasAshaa]

Hearing you rant about the HSTV-L is very reminiscent of my own rantings about the old Hover Mode or upcoming Master Modes in Star Citizen

[@kevshabunas523]

I really appreciated the Surfin bird edit in and out... I had to go back and make sure that wasn't my own brain adding that in

[@jasonzhou5783]

3:42 about the drivers hatch, there's been a bug for about a month now where APFSDS just doesn't ricochet no matter the angle, which has been fixed just today. So it's probably not that feasible anymore. Noticeably affected the Abrams UFP as well.

[@tech6985]

11:16 mate, they only listen when you give them classified info

[@Thebaconmurderer]

I kinda want to watch you take out the type 10 and TKX since it alleviates that reload and pen trouble that the HSTV-L has but with a 120mm instead of a 75mm.

[@computer3255]

the hstvl should get the same pen as m774 but with a smaller spall cone, and a proxy round with the auto lock feature, and then it would be good at 11.0.

[@mattin5850]

IF you do get the ammo specs, they will call it a leak even if its declassified and just send you the other way

[@PonyJarCollector]

7:06 I think this is the first time I’ve heard a Sam Hyde soundbite used in a while. Good shit.

[@maledetto1221]

Spookston: the only person that can't leak military documents to Gaijin to fix a tank

[@coh2conscript851]

Gaijin really just said NUH UH

[@householdhacks]

you know what's really disappointing? hitting a bomber during a bomber run with the main cannon after the machine guns in a starter tank with a really bad turret rotation and really slow speed shell at 50m range but still didn't kill it. dang thing flew off with hardly any damage. ps the main cannon shell hit the engine.

[@TrepidDestiny]

I think an underrated aspect of the HSTV-L is that it FEELS good to play. Even stock as mine is, I have a blast playing it because it handles nicely. Until I actually start shooting things that is. Then it becomes a chore.

[@neck1156]

0:00 I was deadass expecting it to be "this is sub-optimal" LMAO

[@carimannola1447]

4:28 really nice sound effect