Sports Photography: Tele Extenders - The Pros and Cons

[@steventaylor5618]

Excellent Ben. Keep them coming.

[@BenLumleyphoto]

Thanks Steven

[@johnmallett2217]

Top review Ben. I have used a x1.4 for many years before getting a 400 f2.8 and had some decent shots but can’t believe the quality difference I now get with the prime. The loss of f stop with the extender is a problem at times in low light but would certainly hang onto it. Interested to try it on the 400 on a sunny day at the cricket where f4 will be just fine

[@BenLumleyphoto]

I'm excited to get a prime in the new year although my back may disagree!

[@johnmallett2217]

@@BenLumleyphoto I have had 300 f4 for a while and was keen to upgrade to a 2.8 at the beginning of the year but put it on hold when the virus hit and sport was on hold. I saw a 2nd hand 400 2.8 at the end of the cricket season and bit the bullet. Only disappointment was I didn’t get it in time for any cricket but am slowly getting used to it at the football. Have also traded in my 7Dii and am using it on an R6 with some encouraging results. Also added advantage of a weights work out 🏋️‍♂️ every game, as you say the back may see it different but I like the idea of sticking on my tripod on the boundary edge for the cricket. Hope you well and keeping busy. Take care

[@lensafergunn6363]

Bagaimana dengan autofokus nya saat menggunakan tele extender?

[@BenLumleyphoto]

The autofocus is fine, its a little slow at times but its something can easily get used to.