very nice singing. i give 99% marks for this wonderful singer. mehema sing keranna hamotama ba.. akurak waraduna kiyala ayi lankawe minissu mechchara kuhaka wenne. i am sum of music masters
@DulinaSandiv-qk3bj Жыл бұрын
Hukpn tho baudyek nam neme
@dilshanfernando5621 Жыл бұрын
Aah meka boudda geeyak da .? Man hithuwe srilaankikayan okkoma ekamuthui kiyala. Oba thuma nam honda kenek❤
Musicians have analysed the national anthem issue. Non-constitutional lawyers have issued constitutional law statements by just looking at a couple of disjointed constitutional provisions. I did not see a single constitutional lawyer writing on the topic. So, here is my two cents as someone who has studied constitutional law since 2007, taught it since 2013, and published on it since 2015: 1. As per Article 7, words and music of the national anthem are set out in the Third Schedule of the Constitution. 2. The Third Schedule indicates the national anthem is written in E flat Major in a 2/4 time signature. 3. The Third Schedule does NOT indicate whether a variation in the key signature is prohibited. 4. As per Sri Lankan law, the authoritative text of any law is the Sinhala version. According to Article 7 of the Sinhala version of the constitution, what is set out in the third schedule is the පද මාලාව හා සංගීතය which does NOT mean that the schedule authoritatively determines notes that should be vocally sung. 5. It is therefore possible to interpret that the notation is for the instrumental rather than for the vocal performance. 6. It also appears that the musical notation provided in the Sinhala version of the constitution is different from western notation. (I am not making any authoritative comments on this specific point because I have not professionally learned to read Sinhala notation.) 7. The constitution does NOT specify the kind of musical instruments that can be played when performing the national anthem. 8. The interpretation provision of the constitution is Article 170. None of the ambiguities pertaining to the national anthem are clarified here. 9. The constitution does NOT include an official sign language version of the national anthem although this has been sung / performed in many an instance to the appreciation of many citizens who prefer an inclusive society. 10. Against this background of constitutional ambiguities, it would be extremely unfortunate if we suggest that a singer should be arrested / penalised for a variation or a real/perceived mistake. 11. Such an approach would mean that anyone singing a single flat note, singing in sign language version or playing an instrument that is 'usually' not played for performing the national anthem can be arrested. This creates a constitutional absurdity. Remember that if you advocate for someone's arrest because they sang the national anthem badly, that means even YOU can be arrested if you sing a SINGLE NOTE FLAT on the national anthem or get one single word wrong because the constitution does NOT differentiate between famous people singing alone on a stage and a non-famous person singing the national anthem in a crowd. 12. Judgments on constitutional law and treatises on constitutional law, treatises on constitutional and statutory interpretation dictate that such interpretations as would lead to constitutional absurdities should be avoided.
i think as a musicians if you have msater of knowlage of vocal music..please carefully listen to the tone & middle frequent of the tonge language musicians, that should be a great opera output by her. their was no sound out coming "mahata" it's deep monatique rhythm of opera music with vocal sound of " mata"... think to be all of the sri lankan are poor with understanding of sound track identifications,....Umara done her job very well, it's rich with nice & beuty,,,good job.. umara
Very true. Weren't there any other girl or a lady who can pronounce this song properly. Should punish the organisers for choosing Umara for this event. This is not a joke.