Stare Decisis Doctrine: Definition and Example Cases

  Рет қаралды 140,239

Study.com

Study.com

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 23
@alessiamulaj4444
@alessiamulaj4444 2 жыл бұрын
i'am a law student in Italy and next week I have to do an exam about comparative legal systems. and this video is very clear. I I have not found anyone video on KZbin that explains this subject as you explained it. love love VERY GOOD
@moosilicious
@moosilicious 7 жыл бұрын
This was extremely helpful for my homework. You went at the perfect pace. Thank you.
@alexeybarykin2650
@alexeybarykin2650 5 жыл бұрын
Musi Moon me too. Hello from russian law faculty sukableat
@rhondalam
@rhondalam 4 ай бұрын
The end of the video gets cut off before the sentence was completed.
@leesahmadondo766
@leesahmadondo766 3 ай бұрын
Straight forward explanation thank u
@motivatedwoman3065
@motivatedwoman3065 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. You explained it very well.
@judithanih542
@judithanih542 6 жыл бұрын
Very beautiful and clear explanation
@swrace
@swrace 2 жыл бұрын
As a pro se litigant, this was very helpful
@ashishpuranik3471
@ashishpuranik3471 6 жыл бұрын
The video ends in between.
@mariealt
@mariealt 3 жыл бұрын
thanks but the end???
@chesusd9884
@chesusd9884 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you this helps me a lot!
@msrabiahealthcarecenterand2058
@msrabiahealthcarecenterand2058 8 жыл бұрын
I seen Stare Decisis Doctrine: Definition and Example Cases.
@dmoneygraves
@dmoneygraves Жыл бұрын
this helped me with my homework so much, wheres part 2? she was cooking lol
@stephenhampshire202
@stephenhampshire202 7 жыл бұрын
Explanation of Stare Decisis The doctrine of Stare Decisis is a legal principle by which judges in the UK are obliged to respect the precedent established by the previous decisions of other judges. For example if Conservative judge A decides in 2010 that the punishment for killing another person is twenty-five years in prison, then Liberal judge B in 2017 cannot decide that the punishment is twenty years. In 2017 Judge B must follow the precedent established by Judge A seven years ago. And so Judge B must say the punishment is 25 years not 20 years. Judge A Judge B 2010 2017 So judges in the UK are required to interpret the law in the present according to what other judges decided in the past VIDEO: Read the text below Stare decisis is a Latin term. It means to stand by things decided. Stare decisis is a doctrine used in all court cases and all legal issues. A doctrine is simply a principle or an instruction but it is not necessarily a rule that cannot ever be broken. The doctrine of stare decisis means that courts look to past similar issues to guide their decisions. The past decisions are known as precedent. Precedent is a legal principle or rule that is created by a court decision. This decision becomes an example or authority for judges deciding similar issues later. Stare Decisis is the doctrine that obligates courts to look to precedent when making their decisions. These two principles allow American law to build case by case and make our legal system a common law system. For example let’s say (person) blue borrows (person) red’s lawnmower while red is away on vacation…. (video continues). Now listen and answer the question below: Lawn mower Yellow car How are the red man + blue man regarding the red lawn mower and green man + yellow man regarding the yellow car used to explain stare decisis? - to repair a lawn mower = to fix a lawnmower Answer The judge’s decision that the green man must repair the yellow car and not replace it (i.e. buy a new yellow car for the yellow man) is based on the precedent of the red lawnmower which the blue man had to repair for the red man but not replace it (i.e. buy a new red lawnmower for the red man).
@awesomemantroll1088
@awesomemantroll1088 3 жыл бұрын
"UK"?
@claudiasrandomvideos7097
@claudiasrandomvideos7097 Жыл бұрын
@@awesomemantroll1088 Yea why do you think US is a common law country? A lot of college students from outside the US use this video
@readers9721
@readers9721 7 жыл бұрын
This really helped
@imaMickeysman
@imaMickeysman 6 жыл бұрын
0:23
@andrewl5272
@andrewl5272 6 ай бұрын
Can someone show this to the Supreme Court?
@alexadamsandler
@alexadamsandler 4 ай бұрын
Nice video. Only one thing to say. You cannot say STARE DECISIS in american/english pronounce. It's latin! You must pronounce it as you read it in Italian...
@Fc3s808
@Fc3s808 2 жыл бұрын
"Rule of precedent" in other words "law". Which means the judicial system is creating law. Bypassing our legislative system.
@danwolfe9087
@danwolfe9087 2 жыл бұрын
Good description of yhe legal term stare decisis. But the speaker has serious case of glottal fry.... every sentence ending with a crreeeking.
@senilefoolidge2777
@senilefoolidge2777 6 жыл бұрын
This helped a lot, thank you.
The Articles of Confederation and the Northwest Ordinance
2:34
Supreme Court Shenanigans !!!
12:02
CGP Grey
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
ССЫЛКА НА ИГРУ В КОММЕНТАХ #shorts
0:36
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Learn Voice Acting has IT'S OWN CHANNEL!!
3:07
Joe Zieja
Рет қаралды 765
doctrine of precedent
11:11
LearnLoads
Рет қаралды 136 М.
What is Business Law: Definition and Overview
5:43
Study.com
Рет қаралды 330 М.
Top 10 Supreme Court Justices in American History
19:06
Mr. Beat
Рет қаралды 297 М.
Stare decisis the doctrine of precedent www.e-lawresources.co.uk
2:32
How Student Loans Are Changing, Regardless of the Supreme Court Ruling | WSJ
6:59
The Wall Street Journal
Рет қаралды 768 М.
Stare Decisis: What Is Stare Decisis? [No. 86]
3:58
The Federalist Society
Рет қаралды 193 М.
Lecture3 Doctrine Of Precident
48:38
Faculty of AHSS, University of Limerick
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Binding and Persuasive Authorities (Stare Decisis)
14:14
Eugene Kim
Рет қаралды 37 М.
How to Read a Case: And Understand What it Means
15:25
LegalEDweb
Рет қаралды 585 М.