Study.com: Warm Up To Greatness
1:01
Study.com + ETS Praxis
21:28
8 ай бұрын
Study AI for Teachers
2:35
8 ай бұрын
Study AI for Test Prep
3:59
8 ай бұрын
Study AI for College Students
3:24
Пікірлер
@jwehrman2694
@jwehrman2694 3 күн бұрын
Distributive Property! Anything inside or touching the parentheses is first. He got it wrong!
@Llaveocculto
@Llaveocculto 3 күн бұрын
No wonder my math grades were always bad fuck my teachers lol
@jennyofbabylonia
@jennyofbabylonia 4 күн бұрын
Answer is 1. 2(2+2) is = to (4+4) by distributive property. Solve for parentheses which would be 8. 2(4) in this equation is not the same as 2 x4. You did not solve for parentheses.
@afonnes1980
@afonnes1980 4 күн бұрын
Then why is it that if instead you just write it out differently with 8 on top and 2(2+2), you get 1 as the answer? Same problem but written in a different format.
@thisisgrace7268
@thisisgrace7268 4 күн бұрын
Actual 0:57
@arieltaylor5512
@arieltaylor5512 4 күн бұрын
This video cuts off mid sentence.
@allenabeth15
@allenabeth15 4 күн бұрын
You didn't finish the parenthesis!!!!!!
@tylerjohnson35
@tylerjohnson35 4 күн бұрын
Now if you show it as a PROPER mathematician would written as 8/(2*(2+2)) then there wouldn't be an argument. These trick problems never occur in our profession until some uneducated clown comes along and butchers the expression.
@tiffanygallagher9647
@tiffanygallagher9647 5 күн бұрын
2(2+2)...... anyone remember ALSO being taught you could multiple the 2 on the outside of the brackets times EACH number on the inside and then add the two numbers together? so it would be 4+4 = 8. The bracket doesn't go away. It is there to show that step should be done first. PERIOD.
@D1hater-l6h
@D1hater-l6h 5 күн бұрын
THIS GUT IS AN IDIOT
@ibrahimahmed4008
@ibrahimahmed4008 11 күн бұрын
20th comment
@andrewe360
@andrewe360 13 күн бұрын
Trans rule cannot trump Consumer Law protection except in extreme or special circumstances exceptions
@RC-pz7tg
@RC-pz7tg 14 күн бұрын
The 2(2+2) is locked together. It is one side of the equation and can’t be broken apart. The question with are trying to answer is what is 8 divided by 2(2+2). You cannot do this without solving the 2(2+2) completely. It makes no logical sense to jump back and forth. 8/2x(2+2) is what this dude is solving. The answer will always be 1 for the way the problem is written.
@77dlight
@77dlight 19 күн бұрын
Cap
@AnnLouiseSantos
@AnnLouiseSantos 23 күн бұрын
Panget siya
@AyaKareem-n9k
@AyaKareem-n9k 24 күн бұрын
I'm from Iraq, and I want to subscribe with your website. I don't know how l do that
@TheGhostReacher
@TheGhostReacher 28 күн бұрын
Ffs. I was taught math by absolute idiots in school.
@kierstinrandall1841
@kierstinrandall1841 29 күн бұрын
I don't agree. But like every thing changes in life. So does interpretation of things.
@AmjadJob-f5u
@AmjadJob-f5u Ай бұрын
يا هو فين تكمله الفيديو ؟ ياخي معقوله ؟
@lindsaygreen4320
@lindsaygreen4320 Ай бұрын
So you don’t do the distributive property rule 👀🤦🏽‍♀️
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
The Distributive Property when understood and applied correctly supports 16 not 1
@raenandlal5893
@raenandlal5893 Ай бұрын
I was taught PEMDAS but also taught division is just a fraction written out. In problems like these, turn it into a fraction then solve it.
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
8 -----(2+2) = ?? 2
@richardpickman7594
@richardpickman7594 Ай бұрын
am i going crazy? if you write this as a fraction, it would be 8 over 2*(2+2), which would be 1…
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
Wrong 8 -------(2+2)= 8÷2(2+2)= 16 2 8 ---------- = 8÷(2(2+2))= 1 2(2+2)
@Explorer724
@Explorer724 Ай бұрын
Quick thought experiment: What is (4+2)? Easy, 6. But why? (4+2)= (6)= 6 Here lies the problem. The parenthesis does not simply go away. There is a hidden expression overlooked. (6) actually means (6)= 1(6)= 6 In fact, for any number by itself, you can express it differently. 8=4(2) or 1(8). The parenthesis bounds the expression as a term. Any manipulation (i.e. functions) outside the expression changes the meaning. Regardless, the problem is poorly written to draw up ambiguity.
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
WRONG... You can't factor a denominator without maintaining all operations of that factorization WITHIN a grouping symbol... Parentheses group and give priority to OPERATIONS INSIDE the symbol not outside the symbol. When there are no OPERATIONS left INSIDE the parentheses to evaluate you absolutely can remove the parentheses and replace the implicit multiplication symbol with an explicit multiplication symbol... There is no mathematical difference between 8÷2(2+2) and 8÷2×(2+2). There is no mathematical difference between 8÷2(4) and 8÷2×4 The correct answer is 16
@Explorer724
@Explorer724 18 күн бұрын
@RS-fg5mf 6 ÷ (6) please. Show your work.
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
@@Explorer724 your question is ridiculous.... 6÷(6)= 6÷6= 1 What's your point??
@Explorer724
@Explorer724 18 күн бұрын
@RS-fg5mf "your question is ridiculous" Subjective. "Your point" Based on your logic, 6÷(6) follows as such: 6÷(6) 6÷1(6) 6÷1=6, then follows 6•(6) 6•6 36 However, that's me filling in the blanks of your logic. You still need to show your own work on my example.
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
@@Explorer724 6÷(6) and 6÷1(6) are NOT mathematically the same... Dunning-Kruger 6÷(6) the Denominator is 6 6÷1(6) the Denominator is 1 Your logical is circular and wrong... There is no rule in math that says you have to open, clear, remove, take off, eliminate or get rid of parentheses. The RULE is to evaluate operations WITHIN the symbol of INCLUSION as a priority and nothing more... 6÷(6)= 1 6÷1(6)= 36
@IndyLiveMusic
@IndyLiveMusic Ай бұрын
Why isn’t the first 2 part of the parenthetical statement (since no multiplication sign was used, I used distributive property on the parentheses)
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
The Distributive Property is a PROPERTY of Multiplication NOT Parentheses and not Parenthetical Implicit Multiplication. As such it has the same priority as Multiplication and Multiplication does not have priority over Division. The Distributive Property is congruent with the Order of Operations it doesn't supercede the Order of Operations... 8÷2(2+2)= 8÷2×2+8÷2×2 Distributive Property
@equalnom
@equalnom Ай бұрын
8÷a(2+2) = ?
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
8÷a(2+2)= 32÷a
@GrantFoxOfficial
@GrantFoxOfficial Ай бұрын
I swear I always thought multiplication came first
@brajeshnayak2974
@brajeshnayak2974 Ай бұрын
Hello, Can I understand how can we relate the variables x and y in the car examples to the activities the car is doing..?
@Ezel_00
@Ezel_00 Ай бұрын
.... huh? wtf was that scuffed af cut, I was getting into it too 🤣
@AmielCronin
@AmielCronin Ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing such valuable information! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
@chiendybelle
@chiendybelle Ай бұрын
OH MY DAYS
@AhmedKhaled22-10
@AhmedKhaled22-10 Ай бұрын
Who came from school 😂🎉
@Shinichan684
@Shinichan684 Ай бұрын
Well done🎉
@Ark-v3q
@Ark-v3q Ай бұрын
WTF
@Nishbishblue
@Nishbishblue Ай бұрын
this was a video attached to my tenth grade lesson plan and as an indigineous person i have to say it is incredibly disturbing to see our history during this time completely brushed over. the underlying justification for genocide is unmistakable and frankly nauseating. i hated in particular how she painted chief josephs warriors in a "murderous" light, considering they were being forced from their home, their people were the ones being wrongfully murdered and their resources and land were being stolen. its entirely disgusting to see the federal governments actions glorified and any resistence is seen as unfounded. viewing the settlers as the victims in this time period is ignorant and wrong. we need to educate our youth in the REAL history and stop painting warriors who stood up against the genocide commited by the us as unruly savages who just cant "cooperate" with asimilation. like if you are also an "uncooparitve" indian. ✊🪶
@maccx2007
@maccx2007 Ай бұрын
this is my senior year in high school and I really wanna do something interesting. I’m going to win!!!!! Watch me
@BeFreeForInfinity
@BeFreeForInfinity Ай бұрын
Worship means defiling. They’re not revering the Mother Goddess, they are defiling her and what She stands for
@harrywalta7599
@harrywalta7599 2 ай бұрын
you spelt Calpurnia wrong.
@Megbabe426
@Megbabe426 2 ай бұрын
Why are they drinking wine??
@christopherlalnunkima8192
@christopherlalnunkima8192 2 ай бұрын
Wrong in math there no left to right rule.
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 18 күн бұрын
There is a left to right convention that works because of the Properties and Axioms of math not in spite of them.
@ViPUL_RATHOD_
@ViPUL_RATHOD_ 2 ай бұрын
Why play store this app in not aplod in other countri
@georgemitchell7788
@georgemitchell7788 2 ай бұрын
She's A Good teacher she's plan and clear need to live with her for 5 years
@MUsman-b6j
@MUsman-b6j 2 ай бұрын
Scientific method in Urdu
@harshsahu2553
@harshsahu2553 2 ай бұрын
ITM UNIVERSITY ATTENDENCE (Tap like button ) 💀
@girlielndngn
@girlielndngn 2 ай бұрын
my concentration went from 🤓 to 😧
@Mamosmeme
@Mamosmeme 2 ай бұрын
because im black? yo racist
@danielclay1378
@danielclay1378 2 ай бұрын
Exactly! I may have dropped out of college but I did get an a in applied calculus 😂
@lar7905
@lar7905 2 ай бұрын
I took Algebra in 1963-64 and 2nd year Algebra in 1966-67. I never learned the acronym PEMDAS
@sammantegna1444
@sammantegna1444 2 ай бұрын
Yes baby
@eros5420
@eros5420 2 ай бұрын
My favorite part of the video is where it just starts to get good then suddenly it
@angiebk1
@angiebk1 2 ай бұрын
It's not PEMDAS, it's PEDMAS
@RS-fg5mf
@RS-fg5mf 2 ай бұрын
PEMDAS = PEDMAS they mean exactly the same thing...