Starfield is Embarrassing.

this game sucks lol
follow me on twitch: / connahdc

[@unkosherfood]

i have 150 hours in starfield and agree completely. there is not a single thing starfield does that the studios previous games didnt do better. ive been a bethesda fanboy most of my life so i really tried to like it but still dont feel like i got my moneys worth despite the playtime.

[@TheManOfTheHourEveryHour]

I have 0 hours in this pile of trash game and am better off for it... I've only seen sunken cost clowns defending this sheer middling effort from the same studio that swindled them with 16x the gaslight that was FO76 😂

[@eternaldarkness3139]

SF is worth playing (assuming you like the genre). It is however, most assuredly NOT worth $70. I got my copy included in an AMD promotion; worth every penny.

[@bdleo300]

@@eternaldarkness3139 No it's not. Repetitive, endless generic recycling, duII, Iame lore, Iame factions, Iame combat, bad graphics, bad UI, bad level design, terrible companions, mediocre story...

[@nosse5232]

Starfield is a dissaster, its weird to see it gets some good review. Its booring and empty.

[@Winterfellen]

Carrying multiple guns and having to constantly switch them because lack of ammo is not fun. Bethesda needs to stop making games with guns and stick to ES.

[@ChipsChallenge95]

Everything about this game simply sucks. Even the world building, which is bethesdas strong point, sucks, and might even be the worst part of the game

[@deuswulf6193]

Well, here's the thing about world building and Bethesda. The only original thing they have is the elder scrolls, and the original team is likely gone from the studio, while its founder was driven out with the help of Todd Howard and some corrupt lawyer who was running Zenimax. Fallout was acquired from Interplay. Both pretty much had their worlds already built by then. Current Bethesda is likely not all that good at world building, they are relying on their name and on the IP's name to sell the products.

[@BenChieeal]

Starfield was the first game where I experienced sunk-cost fallacy. I spent so much, I was determined to "get my monies worth". After 120 agonizing hours, NG+, vanilla and mods, I can officially say I fucked up when I paid money for Starfield. I've never felt so much disappointment in a video game. From the gameplay, to the story, to the world building, it all just sucks. Add in the woke girl-boss saturation for kicking you while your already down and you have a disaster. Sad. Just sad.

[@TheBenlueks]

u can play it once and its fun but i got bored after 30 or 40 hours. whereas fallout 3 and 4 and skyrim ive played several times. even if i just end up as a stealth archer no matter how hard i try to be a mage.

[@AetherXIV]

name any feature of the game (except the ship builder) and I'd give it a 5/10

[@efxnews4776]

Ship builder is a niche feature, and by the way, there are better games for folks who like to build space ships, games like Space Engineers,, Empyreon Galactic Survival and Starship Evo are dedicated ship builders... In fact, Empyreon is basically a Starfield properly done, but less realistic in graphical fidelity...

[@SirKnasher]

Have you played Dread Delusion? Might be worth a look if you're looking for recommendations.

[@DCConnah]

yeah ive been thinking about this, 1.0 releases soon too

[@smithexem]

Oh wow genuine opinion on a game, I'll sub to that.

[@Woupsme]

I suffered through 12 hours before giving up. Hope the updates later this year will make it less barren and tedious

[@efxnews4776]

Try No Man's Sky.

[@savageaeternum6047]

This is the same shit i saw with The Witcher 3, Cyberpunk 2077, Mass Effect Andromeda, the ban vagon is crazy. The unwanted and unwarranted hate is not normal. I just passed 830h mark. Just in past 2 weeks by steam i have made 154h of playtime and over 830h in total. Am i stoping any time soon, hell no, this is my primary game now and nothing else i played can compare to how much staff i can do while playing Starfield. From Bounty hunter with his own head wanted all the time by trait, to runing cargo and passanger runs, being ambushed upon entering systems by mercs or pirates and claiming their ships for myself and those are the most fun and trill when i get outnumbered and still get out on top and than also attacking bounty hunter defenders who want me alive for the bounty on my head to be bigger but i decide not to leave them alone, working as corporate spy is my favorite story line and framing other corpos in process is that much more satisfying when i finish all the optional quest during quest line, being literal Clint Eastwood and renaming my space version of 44 magnum "Do you feel lucky punk", working my way as a literal colonial marine in UC Vanguard story line and becoming bug hunter like Johny Rico from Starship Troopers or VJ Dax from second movie who was badass btw, and finally working as a maul within crimson pirates to assist Syss def and get rid of pirate scum. I love all activities, cuz when i first logged in and created my first character and saw all the possibilitys for me to roll play as i was blown away. So to short this one up yes i think a lot of KZbin content creators are straight up liars just so they can get fast likes and views on their videos without fully playing or exploring this game. I mean every day i play i learn something new i didn't know before and possibly didn't care to even look up and see if anyone else have discovered it yet. So to me this is the game of my lifetime. Cheers everyone and have a nice day.

[@Canit19]

Bro has never seen a skill tree before. This game a hundreds of issues but my guy is losing it over one of the most standard aspects of RPGs. Goofy behavior

[@DCConnah]

Yes because it's too restrictive, did you even watch the video

[@haxx1707]

the skill tree is designed like a stupid battle pass just so they can pad the game length. It's a horrible design and makes the game even more tedious.

[@grantboz1147]

One of the poorest games iv played. Boring, long, forgettable characters

[@mobi1etone]

The characters are just flat out unlikeable. First time i turned up at Constellation, my first thought was what a massive bunch of tossers.

[@eternaldarkness3139]

* Sarah didn't like that *

[@Discovery2024-rn8kn]

Like all Bethesda games, fun and new for the first hour exploring the sandbox then...got boring. The writing, narrative, content is for 6 year Olds. Here hoping Bethesda does a v2.0 overhaul to the game.

[@bdleo300]

Coz they're recycling the same concepts and design since Oblivion and Morrowind. Same Iame quests, cringe dialogue and mediocre story, same boring combat, same dead NPCs... it actually devolved since Skyrim in some aspects, for example NPCs in Skyrim &Oblivion had daily routines (like in Gothic2 or KCD). In Starfield named NPCs just stand in the same spot 24h with one or two idle animation.

[@jfkst1]

It is NOT like other BGS games. Exploration is pointless. That is massively different and a huge flaw.

[@GoryionB]

I know some people love this game. But, some people like games about work (Farming, driving big rigs, etc.) This game is pure tedium. There are some mods that help. But no matter what, going from the surface of one planet to another is going to be 3-6 loading screens depending on how you do it....

[@wilssantos2]

That's funny, because after not playing it on release, I came back after the patch and I'm having a blast with Starfield. Like, all of your criticisms are either about things that I actually like, or about things that I don't mind lol. It's interesting how one thing can generate such different perceptions on different persons.

[@mobi1etone]

Starfield is just boring as fuck. Not touched it since December.

[@eternaldarkness3139]

Were Neil & Buzz bored on the Moon? Well maybe... Perhaps that's why Michael didn't join them... Best regards, Bethesda PR Department

[@eternaldarkness3139]

I absolutely hated my first 20 hours in Starfield. I did not partake in activities that would level my character quickly, so the lack of skill points really diminished the enjoyment. Around level 20, it felt much better. There's things I genuinely enjoyed about SF. Certain questlines, the creature designs, and most of all Glitch-Building ships. My A10 & F16 were quite well received. There was plenty I dislike as well: Terrible Stealth System, Boring Repetitive Exploration, Idiot Enemies, Mistakenly thinking Pirate-RP was viable, Empty Enemy Ship & Asteriod Pet Bugs. (I can overlook the lazy writing.) SF was okay, but I'm glad my copy was included as part of an AMD promotion. I'll check out the update next week, see how much it improves combat. Personally, I don't think this update will make SF worth returning to for most players. It's definitely good for those who still enjoy it though.

[@bdleo300]

I actually didn't hate my first 20 hours in Starfield, it was still new I guess... but after 20 hours I realized this game has absolutely nothing to offer apart from recycling the same planets, enemies... story is bad, companions are terrible, quests are boring, factions are IaughabIe (space cowboys). I somehow managed to endure another 20 hours, until I really started to hate it...

[@universeconsciouscitizensc592]

Though it had some good things, Fallout 4 was a warning. I waited for reviews on Starfield, and the warning seems valid.

[@thedurrancefamily3579]

Starfield was released with Bethesdas other studios not doing their hobs. Why they were fores and the studios closed. Starfield is the cyberpunk of 2024. Cyberpunk bandwagon jumpers called that game trash. Starfield will be the biggest comeback game in history. Mark my words. Its so much netter wirh maps. I own every Bethesda game. Including daggerfall on pc. Its not perfect...yet. But hey thats my opinion

[@bdleo300]

Cyberpunk was trash and still is, no matter what bandwagon jumpers (CDPR adoring fans and paid shiIIs) say. It was completely broken on realize, now it's just partially fixed but still buggy and mediocre as always.. yet CDPR invested huge money into marketing so bandwagoning sheepIe now love it.

[@Moosemanity]

I played it all the way through, it's lacking a lot.

[@joemama114]

They could have easily fixed this game by completely removing the "You require x more points in lower tier skills to get the skill you want" Let me start leveling the skills I want to, from the start, why not? Why would knowing anything about the hand scanner have any influence on weapon modding or suit modding? Also there are TONS of skills that have 0 right costing 4 skill points, many of them should have been 2 point maximum investment, that would cut down on the tedium of research. Far too many of the RPG elements of this game feel horrible, forced and arbitrary gates, rather than for any meaningful reason or game-play enhancing reason.

[@K-ro7lm]

The generated zones kill the biggest thing every one of these games had going wich was handcrafted storytelling through visuals and npc dialog giving us reason to explore, them taking out interesting weapons/gear and perks and stats was just so they could spend no time developing the actual game systems. It's just a big empty puddle miles wide but an inch deep

[@aaronvasseur6559]

Just do the quests then it’s not difficult still tons to enjoy in this game

[@Aussie-1979]

starfield is utter garbage, u just got a new subscriber!

[@nimarus3118]

Me: "...odd...it's about 300 years into our future and I haven't seen a single mention of any religion that exists today. Did everyone just abandon their religions and adopt one of the three religions in the game? The "I'm a spiritual person", "I believe in human kindness", or "All will be devoured by the space snake!" No way Christianity and Islam just disappeared after a couple generations. What happened?" Bethesda Employee fully decked out in pride gear: "...beats me."

[@naj3633]

star citizen?

[@greggomyegggo8040]

Have to disagree with you on this one. I have over 400 hours and I’ve really enjoyed my time with this game. But everyone has the right to their opinion on it.

[@aaronvasseur6559]

Same it’s definitely a great game

[@USA92]

Mindless hate posting is sad stuff.

[@zupmeoff]

Over 600 hours. Bethesda is incompetent

[@mookieisgoated546]

Fallout 4 and fable I and II are way better starfield is a mid game that didn’t have enough effort put into it. I don’t care what console you put it on it will still be and forever be a garbage game

[@Andriej69]

Amazon bots won't help you defend Starfailed, you butthurt Bethesda vermin

[@IcepickEddie]

you're just now playing this game? well, i mean suffering through this crap some people call a game? sorry to see you going through so much pain.

[@robertraygoza2117]

This video take sounds like it's coming from a Playstation fanboy

[@timeandspace_3.142]

This comment sounds like it's coming from an Xbox fanboy

[@eternaldarkness3139]

These comments are always so laughably stupid. The only thing "Sony-Ponies" are thinking is; "Dodged a $70 Bullet"

[@aaronvasseur6559]

He says you have to through 5 load screens well Yh this is the creation engine no seamless travel plus if you have a series x or a powerful pc those load screens are like 10 seconds so shut up

[@DCConnah]

You are conveniently leaving out that the load screens are everywhere so they build up Sounds like bethesda should start using a new engine then

[@USA92]

It's a typical Bethesda game. It's a shame you went in and actually here admit to going in biased by negative review. The need for posters to hate for views is rather creepy stuff. Nothing but a typical Bethesda game. Not perfect. Bugs. Etc. But this sad need to jump on the I hate this too! train is much sadder. See ya when the bugs are fixed and you're not posting!

[@Yuuppppp]

Get mods. Git gud

[@DCConnah]

You clearly didn't watch the video

[@Yuuppppp]

@@DCConnah git gewd m8

[@dsb333]

Its not that bad

[@YUNGSLEEVES]

get good

[@adrianwilliams6577]

Developers won't always admit they're selling an early access product, like Cyberpunk 2077 Starfield will need more baking time and development before players start to say the game is fun. Bethesda is likely to need longer than CD Project Red to make their game worthy of purchase.

[@efxnews4776]

I'm not sure if Bethesda can fix Starfield, it's problems are different from C77. For example, the story, characters, lore of Cyberpunk is great, can you say the same about Starfield? Presentation is another problem for Starfield... Starfield lacks the presentation, something that Cyberpunk had in gallons. Lore wise I'm not even compare Starfield with Cyberpunk, because the Lore of Cyberpunk reach back from the 80's, but what about Fallout 3? Yes, Fallout 3 has the DLC Mothership Zeta, that DLC has a better lore about the aliens than Starfield! If Bethesda had done a spin off of that DLC, it probably would go better than Starfield Characters suck, all of them are fkg boring...

[@saber2802]

oh boy time to get on my addiction of watching youtubers tell me how bad Starfield is again.

[@NathalieBaughman]

I'm on a trend like this as well, it's funny, I've watched more hours of youtubers bashing Starfield than I have played the game.

[@Andriej69]

Bethedrones need to be reminded that their favorite studio is a giant living failure, and even the success of that shitty Fallout show won't help them

[@jchamilton4476]

Take a break from games for a while. You hate them like most people hate a job. Supposed to be able to have fun in order to give a solid opinion on the game.

[@DCConnah]

in the first 30 seconds i say its not a review and more of a rant

[@jchamilton4476]

@@DCConnahsure; but you made a script, and posted a video. That goes a little beyond a momentary rant. The game isn’t phenomenal, but it aint all that bad either.

[@efxnews4776]

​@@jchamilton4476Starfield is exactly what is wrong with games this days... Uninspired cash grab crap, made only with money in mind not fun.

[@Magneticitist]

@@efxnews4776 Friend of mine told me he started playing it. I didn't know about it so he gave me the gist. I was like yea it sounds like they would make a ton of planets with nothing on them cause Bethesda ain't about to do all that. You'd just be flying around to distant planets to run around and do nothing. So then he was like nah they actually populated everything pretty good, and it's not like you gotta travel far in real time and just wait cause there will be a moon along the way or something. So then I start watching these reviews where everyone is like yea this game is garbage juice, and I'm like wtf?

[@efxnews4776]

@@Magneticitistit seems your friend never played a space sim before. Starfield is bs, buddy, even Mass Effect that you can't even fly the ship is way better than Starfield.

[@artur2604]

This is goooood! I am happy YT algorithms recommended Your channel!

[@sieda666]

Either you haven't played many games and they've all been great, or you're trying to get easy views while coming late to the party by jumping on the Starfield hate bandwagon. It's not the greatest game ever and certainly didn't meet its potential but it's still a good amount of fun for many, and easily launched in a more playable and complete state than say, Fallout 4 or especially 76, which are both currently seeing a resurgence in popularity. This game will ultimately live or die by its mod support, but unless Bethesda/Microsoft really mess that up, I expect we will be seeing people revisiting Starfield when it has had time to mature some.

[@Veteransmoker]

Bethesda sank so low, they made a space game boring. How the fuck do you make space boring??

[@efxnews4776]

That depends... One of the most boring games i ever play was Elite Dangerous, but at the same time i understand why it is boring, it's because the game is way to realistic...

[@DrVenture45]

I think that some people who defend the game should understand that there's nothing wrong with disliking it. It's not going to be everyone's "cup of tea". While there are some aspects I personally don't mind about the game, there are a few things that bug me to this day (be they technical, or developmental). I can't really be excited about new content when there are bugs that haven't been addressed. Also, while story-based DLC has some people salivating, random unexpected situations could be just as exciting; case in point, being attacked upon landing as opposed to walking to a location to meet an aggressor. And yes, there's more that needs to be done before Starfield can truly be Bethesda's opus...and that's just being honest.

[@TheMusicolophile]

I’ve been attacked upon landing. You understand that each person’s play through is going to be different for this game. Your play through is also dependent upon your decisions throughout the game. Have you encountered Poacher’s or Rival Agents?

[@thedurrancefamily3579]

Sorry i have neuropathy and cant type properly...

[@savageaeternum6047]

0:46 You have put 15 hours into the game and you can make a review. The monotony of today's gamers eludes me....do not come out for any review until you have put at least 100 hours into any game out there. I personally have 832,7 hours into Starfield and I still have to make my first NG+ game. The game world is huge and yes I can see that it might not be interesting for everyone, but that doesn't give you or anyone else the right to trash a game, and buddy you made 15 hours only...Gee, I wonder if you even made it into space at all since only 3,5% of people who played the game have ever gone into space itself. And those 3,5% are the people who trashed this game with bad reviews and made clickbates just like you did with this video here. This means they lied when they said that there is nothing to do in Starfield and that space combat is bad, lalalalala

[@nosse5232]

Wow you really spent over 800 hours on empty booring planets over and over again..thats werid

[@savageaeternum6047]

@@nosse5232 Nothing wierd for someone who loves this ganre of video game, and yes i am still playing, among all the content this game provides mods only enreach game lore.

[@DCConnah]

literally 2 lines after the 15 hours comment i explicitly say its not a review

[@TheMusicolophile]

This is such an ignorant take on the game. Did you play for four hours?

[@DCConnah]

could you not get past the first 30 seconds?

[@efxnews4776]

I played for 40 hours, for 20 hours i was expecting the game kick in on the 30 hour of gameplay i notice that i was forcing myself to play, the next 10 hour i was just trying to justify the money i spent on it... Starfield is not the first game that took me a while to kick in, my favorite game is also a space game and takes a whole to kick in. X4: foundations, really is a game that you only start to trully get on it, after at least some 40 hours playing, but also is a difficult game with a steep learning curve, the difference from Starfield is that In X4: after 40 hours playing you barelly scratch the surface, heck, i barelly know how to fly properly the ship with 40 hours... And that is the real difference between Starfield and X4, while in X4 in 40 hours it's was like i was still learning things, in Starfield i was asking myself is this this game is? Thats when i went to look the reviews for Starfield... And guess what, the answer was yes, those 40 hours were only what Starfield was... By the way, i have more than 5000 hours in X4, and I don't regret any of this hours...

[@ddfurrymann]

Yeah the game is straight garbage . Got my refund just in time.

[@VeloxCorvum]

I've just started playing and have about 50 hours. I disagree with some of the points you've made, particularly regarding the levelling and skills. I like the fact you've got to plan and develop your characters individual skills before jumping to a new one. I also feel that the levelling is quick enough that I find myself forgetting about the skilltree and coming back later to like 4/5 points at once. I definitely see you point though as it can be tedious. The main thing that's kept me playing is the story. Definitely not the main story because its pretty uninspired and become a 'space god' doesn't do it for me. However, the faction quests, particularly the UC & crimson fleet, are brilliant and some of the best narratives I've seen in a while. I have to admit, the level design and planetary traversal is boring as hell and I've only been able to keep playing to see where the story goes. I doubt you got to all the 'Unity' stuff since you didn't play for that long but part of is completing the EXACT SAME fetch quest 24 separate times. Its such a shame because starfield could've been incredible and you can still see some of the spark in the narrative and world building. Overall I'd give it a 7/10 but only because I'm the sort of person who can give up a bit of the gameplay for a good story.

[@VeloxCorvum]

Apologies for the essay.

[@aaronvasseur6559]

7 out of 10 that’s a good game ignore what people say anything over 5 is good

[@mobi1etone]

'you've got to plan and develop your characters individual skills' - Yet you can still beat the game without spending a single skill point. Pointless system.

[@bdleo300]

@@aaronvasseur6559 Ignore what people say, trust Lord Todd and Bethbots.

[@bdleo300]

Recycled graphics from 2015, optimization non existent, animations from Oblivion, stale combat from FO (without vats), empty sterile worlds, pretentious yet very weak main story, tedious and uncreative side quests (90% of them made for 10 years old kids), dull generic factions, repetitive generic enemies, irritating and boring companions and NPCs in general, even more boring, super-slow and mostly useless 'planetary exploration', complete lack of planetary vehicles, terrible AI, bad leveling system (items&enemies), terrible UI, aggressive woke propaganda, endless loading screens and countless bugs (my favourite: disappearing ships, not sure if they fix that one). If it's not Bethesda, no one wouldn't even mention about StarfaiI anymore.

[@joemama114]

I won't like 100+ hours into starfield and I can say, it doesn't even really get any better. Which the game told me when starting out, piloting and ship design are pretty much mandatory for mid to late game. You come across higher level ships even in lower level zones and they are better than you in every way, there's nothing you can do when you're 1v4 and outgunned in rank A ship.

[@mblair5327]

I can level a character to 100 faster than I can get a character to 20 or 30 in other games so needing lots of perk points to unlock things isn't an issue to me.

[@Spaccheesr]

Big thing for me was Starfield launched between BG3 and Cyberpunk 2.0. One of the BEST RPGs I have played and one of the best rpg lite/fps games I've played. Should do Cyberpunk if you're into it. Not a 10/10 but dam good