Starfield Xbox Series X vs PC Graphics Analysis - Is This Bethesda's Best Work To Date?

[@k9px]

Dude... show the FPS

[@EnzoBonelli56]

We... don't talk about that here 😉

[@D71Gaming]

It's a graphics analysis not a benchmark.

[@seanespinoza7683]

Xbox capped at 30, but for pc one would assume much higher

[@ericwalker6477]

I can’t even play on Series X.. it’s fine when ur just running forward but during fights…I just can’t do it. 30 fps makes me sick lol

[@spraynardkruger6426]

​@@seanespinoza76833080 will get you like 45 fps at 1400 with fsr at 75. It's awful.

[@nonyabiz3874]

You can't show fps count lol wtf

[@mm43153]

It's a graphical comparison, not a performance comparison.

[@nonyabiz3874]

@mm43153 lol really 😂 the world know there's only 1 difference lol a 2080 don't look no worse then a 4090ti lol only performance

[@robslams2324]

Im definitely not playing this anytime soon. Too many games coming soon and ive got armored core, and zelda to try and finish before lies of p and alen wake 2 come out on top of a frick load others.

[@jacobtom9736]

Well then don’t buy game pass

[@robslams2324]

@@jacobtom9736 I'm getting gamepass next month for lies of p newbski

[@mint3]

So you're just not gonna mention what FPS you got at all? No FPS counter? What are you guys smoking over there?

[@michaelblanchette1793]

I am so happy that Bethesda learned from their past mistakes to bring us a game that exceeded our expectations. I a relatively bug-free release of a Bethesda game?!?!?! Great job.

[@Nownadda]

I just can’t play 30 fps anymore sorry lol.

[@jegjrtp87]

Sucks for you

[@SOTVT]

I'd say this saves you a lot of money in the future, if you're playing on consoles

[@tristman8413]

It is hard.. once you go 60fps you can't go back 😂

[@anthonyrizzo9043]

Last gen effects, last gen tech, why does it seem like the specs are much higher than they should be? I don't want to hear that the game is big because there's loading screens between all the areas that aren't really shit and seamless. Cyberpunk overall looks better and came out way earlier.

[@_dmfd]

I personally think it looks great on my Series X & B2 65" OLED. Definitely an upgrade over F4 & 76. It's not the greatest graphics I've seen lately, but it still looks remarkable & fresh for a Bethesda Maryland title. One thing I am sort of confused on is back around 2020 or so, Todd had said they were completely rebuilding the Creation Engine & that it'd have its first true succession since Oblivion & F3, & that's the main reason Starfield had been taking so long is bc a whole new engine was being written for it & more importantly - Tes6 to eventually use. I'm confused bc it's evident in the graphics/ gameplay, & also being reported that it was more of a " refresh " for Creation Engine, not a full redev. Back when Todd said this he said that it was the main reason Starfields development was stretched so long, & he assured that Tes6 would take significantly way less time to develope/ be finished since the new engine would be up & ready to go. That's the main thing I'm worried about, is Creation Engine 2 needing way more time & development so it's ready for Tes6 & ends up making its development like 8 years + like we unfortunately went thru with Starfield. That would reeeeally blow & I hope that isn't the case man.

[@silverwerewolf975]

Starts at 9:30, thank me later

[@nicholasfpayne]

I like the part where he says there's no visible FSR artifacting while FSR artifacts are visible on screen.

[@CalvezTheKiller]

Anybody else wishing the colors were a bit more bright/vibrant? To me looks a little greyscale/pale colors contrasted to Fallout 4’s gorgeous blue skies. Just my opinion.

[@jacobtom9736]

Wait until you get to some of the more lush planets

[@Damned_Burnouts]

Yea I thought the similar, if you have the option, change the saturation/tints on your TV, it made my game a lot more immersive

[@broghad8241]

​@@jacobtom9736Which are very few

[@DanKaschel]

It's just the capture method. Your PCs HDR will look much better on a good monitor. Although I guess you're also right that the color palette tends to lean toward neutrals; I have to imagine that will change depending on where you go though.

[@jasonsmith530]

A game this BIG was made for a big TV

[@mattcolson2297]

I bought a 43” monitor just for this game

[@undead9189]

Egh

[@najdo]

65" LG OLED baby!@@mattcolson2297

[@evostu7814]

My rtx 4090 pc running through a 65” oled with Dolby atmos 9.1 surround at native 4k 60fps equals the ultimate starfield experience, I’m ready.

[@michubern1444]

Pc on a tv is a thing😅

[@BluD]

happens to be identical PC specs that i use. so exactly what i was looking for thanks.

[@dionwahn312]

@BF3Hiddenclass2:40

[@DanKaschel]

Haha, same except for a 7900x

[@obi-wankenobi8446]

This... is a very GENEROUS review lol

[@MumboJumboZXC]

No performance mode is some serious bullshit

[@spiketwo666]

looks better than PS5

[@Ghostofenzo]

Yeah you wish

[@squirrel_disaster]

Dude they all look and play the same

[@DepresjaToFikcja]

yeah in 30 fps on new generation lol

[@AlejandroGonzalez-ww6tz]

@@DepresjaToFikcja enjoy playing it on PS5, oh and hope you like to pay 30 bucks more to play ass ps plus

[@tristman8413]

Starfield vs horizon forbidden west graphics 😂😂😂

[@lawyerlawyer1215]

beautiful video, enjoyed it a lot. if i had to nitpick , it was more of a graphical analysis than a comparsion perse , i missed more head to head shots , to see how the console version stood against a maxed out pc version

[@Vakator-29]

Ive had my pc for 3 years now. Looks like my XSX is now better, I always knew this day would come but never wanted to believe it 😢. Time for a 4080 now i guess 😅😵.

[@McGeezle]

Now better? Was it not better before?

[@thomaseruchie1262]

what pc did you previously own?

[@gejamugamlatsoomanam7716]

4080 would curb stomp xbox series x so hard

[@Vakator-29]

I have a 2080. The fact that I'll only be able to do 1080p at 30 fps for this game and still struggle when I've been able to get 1440p 60 for most of my other games is sad. 4k is nice but i cannot play at 30 fps anymore. I tried with rdr2 on the Xbox and it hurt my eyes 😢.

[@ismo9529]

​@@gejamugamlatsoomanam7716says the 0.60% of the steam players

[@RRP801]

These guys saying it ran smooth at 60 with a 3080ti, its a whole different story on reddit? Hundreds of posts saying FPS sucks on high end cards?

[@Bakerwar]

30FPS for the most powerful console😂

[@Peylix]

Laughs in PC 💀

[@SolidSnacking97]

Yea bro this is nothing compared to my rtx 9090 pushing native 10k at 5000 fps ultra real life color shaders and path tracing for real life light conditions… oh wait y’all wouldn’t know anything about that because y’all are stuck at 60 fps 4k…. May as well be at 10 my boy.

[@Bakerwar]

@@SolidSnacking97 🥱😴

[@davidbueso3840]

​@Bakerwar what you expect little boy? High end PC inside of xbox or PS5 running at $500. You're out of your dam mind. How about get a PC and you won't complain. I'm just laughing at you because you make fun of an xbox but it's actually a good for the price; they're practically losing money. But, I bet you don't know anything about computers.

[@x0Fang0x]

@@Peylix even pc performance is shit I should be getting more than 120fps 4k on this game for what it looked with a 4090

[@GameMasterpg]

congrats on the PC getting the video out before Digital Foundry

[@GamingRobioto]

It's crap though

[@francoissmit9749]

Can’t compare this to DF video.

[@mint3]

This goes into zero detail on any of the settings, it's nothing like a DF video. Also, "no FSR artifacts" as they are on screen lol

[@GameMasterpg]

@@francoissmit9749 Who say's I did? Only u. I never ((compared this to DF video)) I only said good on getting it out first

[@francoissmit9749]

@@GameMasterpg you did. That is exactly what you did. So again - you can’t compare.

[@XiLock_Alotx]

that framerate is hard to watch..even through a video. feel bad for XBSX owners having to deal with this, without even a performance option. Such a shame

[@ESKATEUK]

“Next gen” consoles already struggling with these poorly optimised games.

[@davidbueso3840]

I'm playing it, and It's not bad as it seems.

[@robinaart72]

I'm struggling with the jankiness of it - not just fps - but wobbly 'dizzy on ice' movement, even pubg is better - colours in vigor are better (and that's saying something) - then there's the permanent 'isn't this just nomans sky' voice in my head, though NMS was just a better, smoother more colourful experience...albeit without the storylines of course. Kind of feels a bit shit really haha...I'll still stick with it - I like the main story so far.

[@MarioP9511]

I have a 5600X with a 3060ti and a XBox series X. On Game pass, now with the dlss at 4k medium with the mod of AMD AFMF replacing Frame Generation, running in the same 4k 55'' TV with 120hz VRR from Sony X90J, The PC looks better and faster.

[@Kryptix0III]

30fps is just complete trash. Steam is the way to go

[@Archy871]

So FPS on yer PC build?

[@briankgarland]

I think the graphics, and especially the character models, look like 10 year old shit. Can't wait for the mods to fix this crap.

[@TennessseTimmy]

A youtuber who can't put chapters in their video is a human who is lazy at their job.

[@FandangoBatter]

Played for about an hour on X and i can't stand 30fps. I will play a little more to decide if new gaming PC is in the cards. If this game is 30fps hellblade 2 will certainly be only 30fps on X.

[@jimifaughnan7006]

Unbearable I know, it’s worse that with todays graphical fidelity we see that 30fps blur a lot more sharper now and it’s much more noticeable.

[@HaloinfiniteEternal]

Ray Tracing is being used on Xbox Series / Pc and it’s using the most demanding real time global illumination lighting version of ray tracing even if it’s not using shadows or reflections and honestly Ray Tracing global illumination lighting is much preferred in a game like this as opposed to SpiderMan for example where you’d want the reflections for all the city buildings and indoor areas but it would’ve been nice had Bethesda included reflections along with the lighting but as far as shadows I feel those are a waste of resources because ray tracing shadows don’t do much for the visuals compared to standard shadows……….

[@chriswalker3257]

Would have preferred they dropped the RT and achieved 60fps in my opinion

[@HaloinfiniteEternal]

@@chriswalker3257 apparently I was wrong and they used a custom global illumination lighting that’s not ray tracing but who knows I hear global illumination and assumed it was rtgi

[@chriswalker3257]

@@HaloinfiniteEternal im disappointed that the SX versiom is 30fps and the pc performance isnt looking good :(

[@ChristopherYork1978]

It’s ok. You’re not on Bethesda’s payroll. They could have utilized DLSS and RTX but shrugged to save money….on a AAA release that is a 7/10 effort in 2023. Cool aspects of the game. Not GOT though.

[@AG_Da_Gamer]

This video is useless for pc players...

[@mrromanow3123]

There's nothing impressive about these graphics.. looks alright. Apart from the expected terrible looking Bethesda NPC's

[@spiketwo666]

looks better than on a ps5

[@TheShootersBay]

​@@spiketwo666hahahahahaha.

[@ddas7974]

@@spiketwo666 most intelligent xbox fanboy be like

[@jegjrtp87]

​@@spiketwo666😂😂😂😅😅😅

[@AlejandroGonzalez-ww6tz]

Let me know how does it look on PS5

[@jossyyoung9664]

I still dont understand why the series x model was limited to 30fps

[@tristman8413]

Poor development...

[@grahamt19781]

Because it's a console 👍

[@tristman8413]

@@grahamt19781 stupid comment. Loads of games support 60fps

[@grahamt19781]

@@tristman8413 what's your point? The answer is still because it's a console. Don't you think Bethesda would have given a 60fps option if it was technically viable without destroying the visuals. You're in denial. If you want full flexibility for every game then don't play on a console.

[@steadyeddi-yz3sy]

​@@grahamt19781there's always a sad PC fanboi

[@Angry_Wolf754]

Xbox series x... Starfield is constantly crashing for lots of people making it unplayable. There's lots of posts on reddit starfield. Bethesda is ignoring people's complaints.

[@ChairmanOfConstellation]

2:00 this guy wants to play on 3 fps

[@jonr7364]

This video was horrible. Literally no info.

[@michaelfallica]

Does the Xbox version support keyboard and mouse?

[@Uknown76]

Absolutely not only PS5 controllers

[@michaelfallica]

For me this is a major piece of information that is lacking by all of the outlets. I don't understand why everyone is so tight lipped about it. This will determine if I buy a $800 GPU today or not. @@aslgbg

[@Nightmare-xx4gv]

I understand they doing their test with 3080TI but why not doing it with an ever and higher components like a 4090

[@ajsgamingelgatohd4k60s4]

i'll put out some gameplay video's with a super pc out tomorrow

[@XiLock_Alotx]

Theres already plenty of gameplay with "super PC's" available now. Its depressing

[@ajsgamingelgatohd4k60s4]

@@XiLock_Alotx no problem mines £4000 rig

[@Mark-mu4pj]

Super PC to the rescue lol

[@AG_Da_Gamer]

Bro had dynamic resolution scaling on, motion blur on, and fsr? Why not try native? Why have a pc?...

[@govner5977]

i cant do this god damn 30fps on series X PLEASE BETHESDA WORK ON A PERFORMANCE MODE. I would happily have lower graphics with 60fps

[@BVargas78]

I think they'll add it at some point over the next year, but it will probably be at 1080p.

[@Akrymir]

Reflections are cube maps, not SSR (thank god). That's why reflections don't show NPCs, because it's not SSR, as SSR would reflect the NPCs, or at least the parts of the NPCs, that are on screen. Per pixel motion blur is not the "good kind", it's literally the reason most people just turn off motion blur w/out looking. The "good kind" is per object motion blur, where only fast moving objects have motion blur. Per pixel motion blur ONLY exists to hide poor frame pacing. Speaking of frame pacing... where's the performance analysis? Graphics are great, but it's incomplete without the impact of those graphics. Even an RTSS output would have been better than nothing. Why is there no breakdown of the graphics settings, this being a graphics analysis? This is honestly a pretty poor "Graphics Analysis" considering how much is either missing or blatantly incorrect.

[@mikekos7606]

PC with mods best choice, XSX version on disk only for collection. How about XOX, first game without support for XOX? P.S. It’s bad that there is no animation of dialogues and voice acting, and also landing and takeoff are not implemented.

[@cipherbenchmarks]

Is there a fov slider

[@benpoke]

no

[@Jcoxy2k10]

Someone tell me what I’m gunna achieve, I haven’t bought game yet. System: 3070, Ryzen 7 5700x, 32ram and SSD……4K 30?

[@SaltyMaud]

1080p low ~60 fps. You might get 30 on 4k low settings, but I wouldn't call 30 fps very playable.

[@supermetroid009]

*looks at my RTX 2060* sigh well i knew this day would come, time to upgrade....i mean its BEEN time but now its starting to show its age.

[@Bk_owns]

Do you care my 7900 xtx owns ur 2060?

[@killerbsting1621]

no support for 32x9 despite showing running on a g9 at gamescom just wow

[@gamer2101]

The faces don't look so good. It's not a big thing but I have seen better. I hope it lives up to the hype.

[@gejamugamlatsoomanam7716]

All gamea should use path tracing

[@dr.chungusphd108]

I can get 60 on my pc so it’s an easy choice.

[@nesseihtgnay9419]

so premium edition people get to play on august 31 right?

[@WASD-MVME]

PC is the old platform to play at 4K real native 4k

[@leelack9691]

Thank you for this, very informative. Patiently waiting to play on the 6th

[@grayglimpse]

I hate raytracing, always destroys my frames. I like playing at 120 minimum no matter graphic quality.

[@Satabell_Art]

What GPU you use?

[@grayglimpse]

@@Satabell_Art 2080

[@SaltyMaud]

@@grayglimpse I have some bad news for you...

[@grayglimpse]

@@SaltyMaud what's that?

[@SaltyMaud]

@@grayglimpse 2080 isn't going to run starfield at 120+ on _any_ settings. At best you can expect maybe 90 fps on 1080p low with 50% resolution scale.

[@eyedestroyeverything9953]

We waited years and bought 500$ systems that are arguably the best console ever made and they left out a performance mode 😂 30fps is bull**** 🤮 Thanks Bethesda

[@DepresjaToFikcja]

its not stable 30 fps consoles lol but have fun dude

[@Heisen_burger-dude]

Fps crying loser

[@BluD]

digital foundry already proved its rock solid 30fps in 99% of scenarios, the 1% being the games biggest city which will hopefully be better optimized and the loading screens which might be a bug depending on if the Series consoles SSD is fast enough or not. @@DepresjaToFikcja

[@christinaedwards5084]

It uses lots of motion blur to hide the stutter jutter

[@AriCalifornia-yu7vq]

I'm getting 70-80 fps on my pc on ultra 1440p native. It's glorious.

[@onepunchman4444]

Ngl this looks a lot better than when they first showed it last year. Looks like that year delay made a huge difference and its good to see a AAA game launch relatively smooth. And even though its only 30 fps the resolution looked better on the series X.Good job Bethesda. Cant wait to play next week on gamepass. GP needs more games like this

[@x0Fang0x]

For what it looked there's no reason for this to run 30 fps on on Xbox series X. Shit, even high end GPUs are struggling with this one even tho the graphical fidelity isn't noteworthy.

[@alecpelusey9516]

@@x0Fang0xI’m pretty sure the only reason it runs at 30 is because of the cpu and not the gpu, which is why the consoles are struggling

[@onepunchman4444]

@@x0Fang0x everyone I'm hearing from is saying and showing the complete opposite so it seems like you're in the minority

[@TheLegendaryLP]

I’ll wait for this game.

[@EddieW-kx5mz]

I would.. I'm running the series s and the graphics are 12 yrs old at best... at best... I've got pictures that would turn people away from buying this

[@alex1212456]

Fov on Xbox or no?

[@Toroleco]

No mans Skyrim

[@GameMasterpg]

Sony knows they're in a for fight with Microsoft

[@TheLuckyShepherd]

😂

[@GameMasterpg]

@@TheLuckyShepherd GamingBolt gives it 10/10

[@AlejandroGonzalez-ww6tz]

Lmk how does it look on PS5@@TheLuckyShepherd

[@TheLuckyShepherd]

@GameMasterpg yeah I feel like it's getting a lot of intellectually dishonest scores. A bunch of reviewers have a bunch of critique for the game but then they give it a great score. Smh... If you ask me they're worried about being attacked by Xbox fans and or they're worried about access from Bethesda/ Microsoft. That second part is unfortunately a common practice in journalism when it comes to politics, if you criticize a politician too much you don't get access and invited to events. Probably the same situation here.

[@tristman8413]

How? Sony sell hardware ms sell software 🤦‍♂️ or do you mean playstation vs xbox? Because we all know how that 'fight' is going lol

[@Ghosty_cat_]

Does Xbox have a FOV slider?

[@benpoke]

no

[@mrromanow3123]

IGN and GameSpot both a 7

[@THUGPUTIN]

Yea...Never believe IGN and GameSpot.... ACG is better... IGN and GameSpot loves to give 7 and 6 when they don't get paid.... They don't want to bash it or recommend it... A Safe 7 which is a message to Phil Spencer to pay them but uncle Phil doesn't give a fck because he doesn't care about sales number anymore.... All he wants is gaming content for the their gamepass subscribers... 😅

[@Lws-nt6kk]

Didn't know ign and gamespot were the only gaming publications that reviewed games. Maybe you forgot about the 87 metascore😂.

[@biggreek4022]

IGN Spain gave it a 10...just saying the same reviewer for ign gave Prey a 5.....Also out of 51 reviews. it's gotten 9 perfect scores... but let's only concentrate on those 2

[@grosebud4554]

God damnit.. I just bought a ps5 too..

[@g-unit692]

Unlucky 😆😅🤣😂

[@tristman8413]

You can get a series s for a couple of hundred £... be a gamer not a fanboy like the douche bag above...

[@Amhoj1]

not really unlucky considered PS5 has many good games out there.@@g-unit692

[@Slowburnripz]

Dude, spider man.

[@tristman8413]

@biajouorion8604 I'm more excited for rise of the ronin

[@3KPK3]

Looks freaking amazing as expected!

[@szihu]

In some places it looks amazing, in other it looks early ps4.

[@l.r.7505]

​@@szihuThere's always one😂

[@claraclean]

Actually, it doesnt at all...

[@silverwerewolf975]

​@@l.r.7505hes telling the truth

[@krzysztofwozny9742]

​@@szihuYes, it looks a bit uneven, but in some places it's stunning.

[@Satabell_Art]

10:03 did you just say " could've gone 40fps mode" ???? what

[@mm43153]

With VRR (Variable Refresh Rates). Try listening to what he's saying.

[@griffing2234]

So its poorly optimized for PCs because the focused on getting the most out of their inferior console?

[@Satabell_Art]

Nope it's an Old engine, and shitty devs.

[@MrVideoScape]

mid 6/10

[@marshapelo9830]

Its No Mans Land 2.

[@GiannisK]

How about Series S?

[@Leopez02]

I'llthink same because I have Xbox series S and Pc

[@tristman8413]

You mean series potato

[@EG-O]

well i got this game for free so i dont have to worry about not liking it. Well can't wait to test it on my RTX 4090

[@krispydream6907]

I knew this one won’t surpassed skyrim.

[@A-ZoneG4ming]

I knew thias was going to be better than skyrim

[@parzival123]

better than fallout

[@VelcroSnake93]

3:00 - So, do they not have the different FSR quality settings? Is there only FSR 2 ON or OFF?

[@billowywaffle1250]

It uses a slider that goes from 100% down to 50% resolution for fsr. Much more customizable than different quality settings.

[@markojovanovic9651]

Its a newer implementation, you turn on fsr and manually select the render resolution %, instead of fixed points with quality balanced etc

[@facuuaf]

Microsoft invested a LOT of money on helping Bethesda polish their game following Redfall's reception. So this is the exception, not a new rule and definitely not to their credit

[@bigfloppa9594]

Pony detected

[@Akrymir]

MS worked with Bethesda long before Redfall released.

[@lordxboss5700]

If Sony getting credit for Spiderman, Demonsouls, FinalFantasy, DeathStranding etc etc etc Xbox gets 100% credit for Starfield 👍They weren’t even 1st party Studios while Bethesda is 1st party

[@Akrymir]

@@lordxboss5700 There is a large, fundamental difference, in that Starfield was mostly done before MS ever got involved. The PlayStation games you listed where entirely funded by Sony and Spiderman is 1st party. MS surely helped, but was hardly instrumental in Starfield's success... beyond giving them the green light/funding for another year of development.

[@lordxboss5700]

@@Akrymir Spiderman wasn’t 1st party it released in 2018 and Insomniac wasn’t aquired until much later 🤷🏻‍♂️ Insomniac was developing the game before Sony. You give credit to Sony for simply writing a cheque for exclusivity to help fund a game but cry about Xbox actually paying for years of development and marketing of a 1st party Studio and IP 🤪 Do you see the absolute hypocrisy? I bet you blame Xbox for Redfall and it was further along than Starfield but it fits the narrative Ponys always trying to push

[@SolidSnacking97]

The graphics on the series x looked better in this video and 60 fps makes movement seem a bit more responsive but sped up like there’s a missing frame in each second and just compressed some frames instead of adding a new instance of movement so it’s prob more in the range of 50-60 with compressed frames. I get that feeling a lot with 60 fps games. The graphics on the series x and 30 fps seems to be more optimized.

[@Gen_X_Gamer_79]

You a clown I’m playing it on PC. It looks better and plays smoother. There’s nothing smooth about 30fps.

[@SolidSnacking97]

Not saying 60 fps isn’t smoother but its too sped up like everything is moving in smoother but unrealistic faster motion than 30 fps… just saying the frames at 30 are more in sync with real life movement speed than 60 here. And the colors looked much richer and deeper on the series x in this video. The game is much more optimized around current gen console hardware because that’s where the majority of people will be playing the game at that’s just a fact. Nothing wrong with 4k 30 fps with a complex game like this, just means Bethesda pushed the limits of what the console can handle instead of making a half assed battle royal at 4k 120 fps like Fortnite. You’ll be enjoying the game and I’ll be having the same amount of enjoyment for less $$$ because that’s just where technology nowadays has gotten to. Welcome to progress and innovation mate.

[@smashkommentiert]

@@SolidSnacking97 thats a lots of words for "my xbox isnt as good as pc but i like it that way better anywayy!!1!!!"

[@SolidSnacking97]

@@smashkommentiert sure a pc can be better but the series x is better than most pcs out there only exceptions are the pcs that cost thousands to build, but instead of thousands I pay 500 to get a great experience that is pretty much the same except for fewer frames. We both get 4k hdr ray tracing and will get mod support down the line. Sounds like we’re both enjoying the game the same amount 🤷🏻‍♂️. It’s 60 to 30 fps not like we’re talking 1000 to 10 bro 💀

[@smashkommentiert]

@@SolidSnacking97 yeah we are both enjoying the game, so why are you so defensive about your xbox? nobody said it's bad to play on it or whatever. but it sounds like either someone with a good gaming pc triggered you to write these big textes about how little differences there are between the experience or you just can't accept the fact a pc can indeed be better than your xbox in terms of fps and quality xD just enjoy your console man don't waste your time trying to convince others you are enjoying it, everybody who wants to play with 60fps will still play on pc even after they saw your comments and everybody who doesn't care about these things will still play on xbox. (sad ps5 noises xD)

[@anuur3349]

This PC test is wrong. Take a 32" 2k monitor at 240Hz and use the 1440p resolution with everything on Ult. Turn off ANY supersampling or virtual upscaling and enjoy the game better than on any console.

[@tristman8413]

For just triple the price 🤦‍♂️

[@christinaedwards5084]

There is no 2k (unless you mean the developer) QHD or quad high definition or 4 x 720p. 4k is 4 x 1080p.

[@tristman8413]

@@christinaedwards5084 I think he means 1440p

[@goofed86]

Midfield has failed! The days of good Bethesda rpg's is over

[@philthethotdestroyer4194]

you havent even seen anything lol shut up

[@reubenslabbert1446]

Nah

[@Uknown76]

Prove it

[@AlejandroGonzalez-ww6tz]

Let me know how does it play on PS5 oh and enjoy paying 30 bucks more for that shit PS plus that´s doesnt even include PS best sellers

[@tristman8413]

​@AlejandroGonzalez-ww6tz even with a £30 increase its still less money and more value that gamepass... And how does ff7 remake or ff16 or horizon or God of war or demons souls or sifu or kena or spiderman run on xbox? Xbox get 1 half decent game and suddenly playstaion are what 3rd behind xbox and Nintendo 😂😂😂 get over yourself little boy

[@krinodagamer6313]

PC MASTER RACE, XBOX DIDNT KEEP BETHESDA ALIVE PC DID WITH THE MODDING COMMUNITY

[@squirrel_disaster]

I hope it comes out on ps5 soon, even if it's 30 fps. The only issue I have with the ps5 is that I need 60 fps on everything because for some reason 30 fps tears awfully on my tv. Yet 30 fps on the ps4 is fine. I might have to get a hdmi 2.1 tv.

[@Kieren02]

Its highly unlikely the game will EVER release for Playstation tbh.

[@Ankur10798]

At this point the way these console wars are going it's better to have a PC. Xbox games almost always release on PC simultaneously. PlayStation games do not always release on PC simultaneously but eventually they come out on PC in some years. So, on PC you get all the Xbox exclusives simultaneously and if you wait some time you get all the PlayStation exclusives too. TBH, the reason Xbox sells less than PSs is because of PCs.

[@jerrypetrov6594]

@@Ankur10798I agree but most people still can’t dish out that kind of money. It’s also way too complicated to actually start appealing to average gamers in mass.

[@DepresjaToFikcja]

PS5 not need 30 fps new exclusives lol

[@Ankur10798]

@@jerrypetrov6594 That's true. But if you can build a PC, then it's the best. Considering the fact that GPU prices have fallen down, you can probably build a PC with the same capabilities at around the same price. I built my gaming PC recently for around $700, it performs far better than PS5.

[@sonavagun9283]

I'm not a pc gamer really. I have an Asus laptop with 980m that I bought in 2015 and at the time, it was about as good as you can get for a laptop and really only used it for music production. I play xb series x for games. It was time to upgrade to a desktop pc and so I bought a 4090 with ryzen 9 7950X3D 64gig 2tb ssd. I way over did it I know. I get it in 10 days. It better be the baddest mf pc for the price, over 4.5k. I already kinda regret it

[@justinthematrix]

Dang dude and I thought I was bad I just dropped 1200 on a g14 laptop. At least it wasn’t 4500 lol. Still have my pc too it has a 3080 and 5800x

[@dangerzone6481]

You over spent you could get a top of the line pc for half that

[@b4ds33d]

13900k, 64gig ram, beefy nvme with 2tb empty, 4090 water cooled. Can’t wait to see how this will play.

[@Playradise]

I'm gonna enjoy the denial fest by heartbroken Bethesda's bootlickers 😂

[@Uknown76]

Knock it off

[@tristman8413]

It's a 10/10 game of perfection what are you on about 😂

[@Playradise]

@@tristman8413 you mean paid reviews? Let's see how many bugs this broken game has before it gets patched into oblivion 🤣🤣

[@Uknown76]

@@Playradise seems pretty stable so far performance could be better on lower end gpus but overall a solid launch much better than Jedi survivor