Starship Congress 2017: Miguel Alcubierre, "Faster Than The Speed Of Light"

[@emefcue]

great talk! I learned alot. thank you

[@rhondabonner9856]

only 200 views!!? for the real-life zephram Cochrane?!!

[@HebaruSan]

Except in the Star Trek universe he builds and uses the drive instead of publishing one paper and never returning to the subject. ;)

[@matthewdavies2057]

More like the real life Richard Daystrom.

[@matthewdavies2057]

ZC in more ways than one.

[@patriciachang8666]

@@HebaruSan The way zephran cochrane was portaid in star wars was the most unreal. From shock that there were alliens to building from practical 0??? And the other academixs??? the divulgation?? the theory??

[@tijman1]

Best explanation of this subject, thank you

[@wulphstein]

Did you ever consider that you might be able to use a plasma field to raise the standard model fields that your spaceship is made of to a higher energy so that it can travel through air or water without colliding with air/water molecules?

[@sergioderegules]

The special theory of relativity is very general, and the general theory of relativity is very special.

[@damienturchi]

Awesome to hear him speak!

[@rexprangnell6815]

There was a young lady called Bright Whose speed was faster than light She departed one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night She had forgotten to turn off the light

[@1WaySafe]

" Thank You for your hard work". :)

[@MM65629]

Miguel Senor, If fate has it and we build something similar to a warp drive, I will construct a monument of yours taller than the statue of liberty, and name it - Statue of Space Exploration. Semper Exploro People.

[@matthewdavies2057]

And Miguel will want to measure it with a microscope.

[@TMPCarbs]

Great video on Miguel's warp drive kzbin.info/www/bejne/jp3QlaecaLqVo7M

[@stewartprofessionalservice9806]

"I don't want to be a statue!" Zefram Cochrane the inventor of Warp Drive. Star Trek 1st Contact. Xie Xie! Happy New Year

[@Constantinesis]

Yes, he deserves the Nobel Prize! Why wasn`t he awarded?

[@emanueldelacruz1101]

@@Constantinesis Well, it's his fault for being Mexican.

[@FalloutYakuza]

3:32 Isnt it 1.08 billion km/hr not 1 million km/hr? (300,000 km/s * 3600 sec/hr = 1.08 *10^9 km/hr or 1.08 billion km/hr) en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light Wikipedia says the same thing, but it usually isn't that reliable

[@brendosapien]

I love your MO guys.

[@robertmeshew1935]

Nuclear powered tubes in a circular pattern would create a wormhole in the center. Then you need a craft that could fall in every direction (zero gravity) you could go thru it. But I do not know where or when you would go?

[@radioflyer68911]

It's all very interesting theory, but no one is discussing exactly how it can be done. How will you warp space? How will you control the formation of the warp bubble? How will you navigate to your selected destination? How will you prevent overshooting your destination? How will you protect the passengers from the effects of the warp bubble? How will you power the thing? Nothing that detailed is ever discussed.

[@thatsalotofdamage8568]

John Tminustwentyminutes Mercier negative energy

[@mre2u2]

Search: Albecuirre Frontig drive

[@TMPCarbs]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iZmse4ami5h1f6s

[@TMPCarbs]

This video discusses the Albercuirre Fronting drive kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGSbkoNoqbeCeNE

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

Look at related video by Dr Sonny White at Eagleworks.

[@robertmeshew1935]

I witnessed a UFO go thru a wormhole. This is not a joke. In the years I have seen other craft in the area and have heard other people describe UFOs in the area as well. I would like to describe the event to you just to hear your opinion? A few times I have had witnesses with me or around me but not always!

[@sietze.temporary]

Well, actually, there are energy optimizations. It seems Eagle Works has worked out a solution that requires considerably less positive mass and way less negative mass. If used in this way, it would still be a load, but it could be spread out over more time than we would have a non-action reaction drive. This also means we need negative energy or an analog to that well, we have the Casimir effect ( possibly the dynamic Casimir effect, which causes quantum zero-point fluctuations ). If we can switch fast enough, it might be, even if done right, a better option. Of course, a zero point vacuum energy device is, in theory, also a negative energy analog, although probably not possible still with current technology. Given this, we would need a system with a kind of bipolar Tesla coil and a Casimir effect system to try something in a small fashion. Fill this bubble with photons and collapse the bubbles, and you will either have a well sub-space radio based on photons or gravity waves if the bubbles collapse. Another point here is that the original alcubiere metric is just one of a host of solutions now even neatly captured in a software model. Aside from that, having, let's say, layers of energy inside a gas-filled tube with certain waves going through it would possibly make a huge stack of Casimir plates not in a physical medium anymore. Then one would have more Casimir plates thus a larger effect from way more non-physical plates inside a tube so that almost sounds like a setup Nicola Tesla could have built he already spoke about certain effects faster than light he also said I have seen the past and present and future if there where particles to go way slower then light one could just move a certain amount of short distance and see the past through them and if one where to discover some means that go faster than light one would be able to see the future, in theory, well Nicola Tesla said some remarkable things about our current day his future so, in theory, one could work with small warp bubbles and not even need dark matter. Considering that most of the missing mass of the universe has been found in gas clouds, one could, in theory, understand that if they turn into a low-energy plasma considering their size, they can attract or repulse on things as well, making for a lower need for dark energy.

[@rebelforgod]

The Disappearing Horizon Problem, that's the Wormhole,,, but how to select it's length, that's my question.

[@patrickryan1690]

would the energy costs also apply to the alcubierre/froninng drive?

[@ahmetakgun7709]

Clicked the video faster than light! Allow me to be your assistant reascher Dr Alcubierre

[@rebelforgod]

A spinning Black Hole drags gravity horizontally in the direction of spin, so particles falling in will be gravitationally drawn in the direction of that spin. Another effect is, near the poles of the Black Hole, Virtual Particles that emerge from Quantum Fluctuations are pulled apart and get separated enough to radiate away, rather than re-annialating back into the Quantum Fluctuation noise. The Polar Radiated Virtual Particles must somehow lead to Real Particles being emitted. This is my theory on what causes Polar Jets to emit from Black Holes. If Polar Jets occur only with an Accretion Disk, then the presence of Virtual Particles may be dependent on that disk's presence or influence.

[@KraussEMUS1]

If you click on the purple channel icon to the left you can see a rough prototype ion thruster that is able to lift its power supply against earths gravity! Additionally it could alternatively carry a small propellant tank. It is well proven to work an apparently can accelerate 6 orders of magnitude faster than the Dawn ion propelled spacecraft!

[@rebelforgod]

If Quantum Flux Virtual Particle-Pairs were separated instantly as they appeared, to prevent Annilation (as near the poles of a spinning Black Hole), would they both Virtual Particles fall into the event horizon, or would the Virtual Anti-Particle repel the Event-Horizon gravitation to get radiated out of the Black Hole's pole?

[@D.Enniss]

I hope one day humanity will look back on this epoch and say _"It took us centuries, but we were on the right track then, we're there now, we did it!"_ just as we look back at Newton and Galileo etc and use their ideas to shape our everyday lives like it's nothing 😁🚀

[@1WaySafe]

some day, someone will write a book on that which is not "Seen" and our knowledge will compound and congrue, exponentially.

[@LeonHoogland]

Why is he not talking about the work of Sonny White at NASA? White has simulated a working warp drive by pulsing the warp field. According to his calculaions, you can have a warp drive with the energy of current day rockets.

[@wishmaster7062]

LeonHoogland He probably doesn”t believe him. Also no more news from White after his Em Drive tests

[@LeonHoogland]

There's nothing to believe. He used the Alcubierre theory and used an oscillating field instead of a steady field. In the simulation this resulted in a warp drive that was far more efficient. It's an improvement on Alcubierre's theory.

[@wishmaster7062]

LeonHoogland Eeh.. To be honest i didnt understand, how his work, how was he able to generate negative energy field? Or were they trying to measure the speed of photons passing trough casimir cavity or something?

[@LeonHoogland]

This is all still mathematical, done in computer simulations.

[@wishmaster7062]

LeonHoogland I have read on nasaspaceflight that they made an interferometer device to measure the effect, so i assume mr. White actually already have a test setup.

[@sarelarbin]

Missing the concept of origin theory for conceptual paradoxes

[@becon1436]

If you expend or contract space, than it should have density. Density, in its turn always has properties of a medium, whereas space does not have any properties, whatsoever. The so called "speed of light" is relative to density distribution.

[@rebelforgod]

If Quantum Flux Virtual Particles are prevented from Annilation, do they create quarks, muons, etc?

[@antonellodigioia]

Any energy you use (positive or negative) to create the curvature of space time move toward at speed light, any distortion in the space time go away at speed light then you have to use again other energy to reproduce the distortion. The energy used to reach the place where you make the distortion move it at speed light. Then there is no way to maintaining the streching of a space time toward a specific direction then your ship move in pulsed curved space time but near at speed light and not faster than light.

[@herrietako]

It is like surfing in the space :) you create a space wave. I guess if you are going faster than light you should have same doppler effect but with the light waves... I think you only need to create the depression of the front once, then the wave will propagate alone, and to cancell it create another wave in opossite direction... I love science fiction :)

[@aliensoup2420]

54:23 "...the galaxy would have been overrun a long time ago, and it hasn't been" How do we know it hasn't been colonized already? Just because from our tiny speck of a solar system WE haven't seen anyone else, doesn't mean they are not out there. Humans are newborn babies in the universe just beginning to open our eyes. Total human centric presumption on his part.

[@KingB.C.]

Well because that's all the evidence we can produce refers to that. We have yet to find any evidence that says otherwise.

[@supersleuth3527]

Icarus Interstellar - Does time move faster near the galactic center than at the outer arms where we live? Relatively speaking. I’m asking based on how things move slower at the center of an album than at the edge. Since speed effects time, what are the effects based on location (I.e. could earth have progressed faster than a civilization toward the center?

[@sgtjonmcc]

Yes and no there are many problems with living near the center of the galaxy, one the center doesnt necessarily move slower, stars closer to the super massive blackhole at the center are moving at incredible speeds. But the amount of cosmic radiation would likely sterilize any planets too close to the center, not mention if there were planets around stars there they would have likely been riped away from their host star shortly after formation do to the proximities of stellar masses, just to name a few.

[@JJs_playground]

Time should move slower since there's a massive black hole at the centre of our galaxy. So time should slow down.

[@thuddpucker11]

The Alcuberre Froning drive is the superior safer method of FTL.

[@Technofier]

Which builds on Alcubierre's original work...

[@TMPCarbs]

This video discusses it kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGSbkoNoqbeCeNE

[@enriphonejuarez8440]

Bien ahí viejon

[@haripurwantoui]

I'm gonna build these machines 😁👍

[@bluedot6933]

How do they know it connects another universe? I thought there was one universe.

[@rebelforgod]

If Quantum Flux Virtual Particles get separated, how do they compare to Real Particles? If they act like Real Particles do they become Real Particles? If not, how are they different?

[@leighbarton7064]

Before we start trying to go faster than light it would be advisable to put a working infrastructure to facilitate transportation within the solar system. Something like magnetic levitation catapults at the equator the Earth, Moon, Phobos or Deimos, up the side of Olympus Mons,with reactors to power them.

[@michaeljanos8424]

Is NASA actually hoping to have a warp drive spacecraft operational before 3000? If so, when roughly? And would it be an unmanned probe or a manned starship? And to where?

[@Inertia888]

NASA has a hard enough time keeping its goals through each President's stay in office... 🤦‍♂️

[@robertcoyle1532]

Why do all these people always spend half their time re-explaining light cones... relativity... etc, when anyone interested in FTL propulsion should already be way familiar with all these aspects?

[@leslianajoaomarques421]

I know how to do the space fold, it works fine. all I need to do is make it happen on a larger scale all I'm doing is smaller scale.

[@Mr.Thrilll]

How?

[@matthewdavies2057]

If it ends up looking like a 2 inch paper football you're doing it wrong.

[@eagle___shadow]

Nice video👍👍

[@MisterTrotts]

9:55 my inner intellectual coming out: But we also know that light can be slowed due to refraction, is the speed of light of that photon not different, and thus not a single, absolute speed? or is the light then not traveling the 'speed of light'? I'd be very interested to know how that works.

[@fusion9619]

i've wondered about this too. My feeling is that from the perspective of the photon, it is still moving at the constant c, but reconciling that with the rest of the universe trips me up. I hope some kind person can shed some light (har har har) on this for us

[@javierruiz9023]

www.askamathematician.com/2011/08/q-if-light-slows-down-in-different-materials-then-how-can-it-be-a-universal-speed/

[@javierruiz9023]

No different than you pulling down your window shades so light cannot pass. If the shade is translucent, some photons will pass some will collide with atoms of the window shade. The absorbed photons are what heat up your shade, the photons that make it through are represented by the illumination you see through the window shade. An analogy would be you riding your bike on asphalt and then you encounter a muddy patch that slows you down, (you being the photon) once you exit the muddy patch then you resume your normal speed.

[@fusion9619]

It's so much simpler than i thought it would be! Thank you!

[@JJs_playground]

Light or photons aren't traveling slower than C (they can't by their nature). They just have molecules/atoms of the defraction material (i.e water) standing in their way. So they have to bump through some of them to make it out the other side. Take the photons coming from the sun, some can take up to 1 million years to reach the surface of the sun and eventually hit earth. Does that mean light has slowed down that much, no.

[@stephenangus7296]

The tachyon is time related energy/matter, this maybe in the warp bubble structural formation. Starting to look at this along with the horizon issue. Thanks for the heads up.

[@johnderhammer7530]

With all due respect, the temperature within would exceed 10 E-30 within the capsule. A Pulsar Simulator requires in excess of 275tev of energy and the wormhole thereby created could theoretically be opened for approximately a femtosecond. Any craft would be gamma-irradiated and spaghettiphied by gravitational/inertial centrifugal vortices. Look at how you Earthlings have erred with Hydrogen-Oxygen propulsion. Magnetohydrodynanic Propulsion can be difficult if the Rutherford Cup is off-center by a picometer. Can we say Positron?

[@aliensoup2420]

If space is a thing that can be moved and stretched like a 'fabric', what makes it any different from the discarded notion of the Ether?

[@stargot1]

We can see the past but we cannot travel onto.we cannot see the future but we can travel to.

[@keithmoorechannel]

Where is everybody? We have met everybody and he is us.

[@marionpettersson6575]

"Not travel FASTER than the speed of light?" One cannot REACH the speed of light whith a limited amount of energy. What happened to Burkhard Heim's theories?

[@harrismain6600]

Marion Pettersson if you actually watch the video and do research you’ll find that it moves space not the spaceship

[@marionpettersson6575]

@@harrismain6600 Of you had read my note thoroughly you should know I wrote a mass cannot reach the speed of light whith a limited amount of energy! I wasn't talking about moving space! Spacetime itself can reach any speed, even way beyond the speed of light! And I Still wonder what happend to Burkhard Heim's theories?

[@lenorejohnson5428]

How can eye help?

[@williamlevine5440]

A few years ago I had a "dream" or "OBE" that (in retrospect) took me through that process described in the previous "warp" process summarized in the Asteronx video. I'll describe the process (sometime when I have time!). I went to the future (I believe) to Jerusalem. The humans seemed different (distorted)...again I'll have to postpone describing my recollection of my experience. I want to add though, that why must scientists and other scholars consider faster than light speed (or warp) as the objective, when we should be proposing the concept of the "speed of thought"?

[@javierruiz9023]

Maybe because we are not from Tau Alpha C...

[@MM65629]

Do you remember the dream properly ? I would like to know about it completely

[@LukePawlowski8]

TLDR - Miguel Alcubierre, "The Alcubierre Warp -Bubble- is just my fun thought experiment, and I don't expect it to work."

[@user-wy4mp9ts3u]

But light does change speed and always does relative to the permittivity and permeability of free space according to Maxwell's equations;but the secret is that time changes so ones perception of speed does not change.We know how to make light travel slower than the speed of light and we know what we must do to make it travel faster but we don't know how to evacuate space so as to reduce the permittivity and permeability but if we can then we can travel much faster than light,well relative to an observer although the observer would never be able to see it but within the bubble of space time the speed will still be limited to the speed of light only the rate of time flow will have changed and that relative of course to outside the bubble.

[@josephwotherspoon9635]

anyone else triggered by the guy in the front row who takes 20 fcking images of the same slide???!!

[@lilrabbit8203]

Funny he takes a picture of almost every slide like hes going to build it in his backyard. Funny but annoying

[@rebelforgod]

If Quantum-Fluxuation Virtual Anti-Particles have Anti-Mass(respond negatively to gravity), then an Event Horizon would form a cloud of Virtual Anti-Particles escaping the Gravity-Well. This would be from Warped Space-Time-Sifting of Random Quantum Flux Particles at their moment of creation, preventing their recombination and annilation. Personally, I think both Virtual Particles have positive mass(are attracted to gravity), or we'd see haze coming from Black Holes even when they aren't feeding(or perhaps virtual Anti-Particles don't emit radiation unless interacting with something else).

[@danielash1704]

Looking for those micro wave signals from space is covered up with X-ray and many others .We are all traveling the speed of light the trick is standing still.

[@scmacsart]

If space time is curved like the diagram you would still go to the same universe. To go to another universe it would be a different layer of space time.

[@matthewdavies2057]

I wondered why he doesn't do events. Now I know.

[@MisterTrotts]

1:00:30 if you could string multiple impacts together at extremely acute angles, something like 1 or 2°, and then used some sort of ablative shield to absorb the energy, maybe you could have a highly efficient engine with high efficiency, but you would be talking about mN of thrust in vacuum. Much like an ion thruster, when comparing Efficiency and thrust, with much more engineering and power being necessary. simply accelerating those particles would consume millions of joules of energy.

[@BAGSHAWL.A.]

1000 subscribers.. your welcome lol🔥🔥🔥

[@kevbef12345]

why are those people so smart and i in comparison so dumb? :3

[@juanmf]

Speed is m/s we see C constant because our m changes. So our rule in m/s trick us. see Konstantine Meyl extended field theory (Objectivity).

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

WHY is the meme "go back in time, kill your grandparents: contradiction"? Why isn't the mem simply "go back in time, kill your(other) self: contradiction!" ? Making that point to include one's grandparents seems unnecessarily complicated.

[@sergioderegules]

Well, obviously, because killing your grandparents is less frowned-upon than killing your parents or your younger self. Duh...

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

@@sergioderegules ??? What? No. How the f is that "less frowned-upon"? Killing yourself is FAR less frowned upon than MURDERING ANOTHER.

[@Snorkeldykkeren]

This Alcubierre drive idea is funny, especially when they proclaim an A.I has to be captain of the ship, navigating using what kinds of signals...? If nothing can penetrate the proton shield created around the ship and it collapses if it isnt complete, how will you navigate a ship flying faster than the speed of light? Assure you dont hit any of the numorous huge asteroids and comets, planets or stars?, which will destroy the ship

[@SuperDipMonster]

From the point of view of the crew if the ship, the Universe is being moved around the ship. This means it isn't travelling FTL.

[@truthtellerable2713]

Contradiction. He claims to not believe or endorse the multiverse theory but he used it in his explanation of black holes and wormholes... 34:30

[@jaminewman9278]

heck Miguel I have a star powered project coming out that bases off of your theory just star powered. gravity motor even works today threw quantum entanglement of solar waves that have saturated sace to a static point

[@becon1436]

That feeling when somebody's trying to cheat you. That's not the way the universe works but rather the official "science" trying to convince you it is the only way it works for some reason.

[@denislambert233]

Huuum First let tell you that i am fascinated by astrophysic, quantum physic and quantum mechanic. But you know it is not because you are talking about the speed of light that you have to talk at the speed of light Geees ! Even whit the subtittle «sap» i have hard time following you we are not all astrophysicens, we need time to comprehend the subject. Well I guess speed IS realy a relativity matter, because maybe for the scientific communaty your speed of talking is relativitly slow, but for the nerdy geek like me who diden't major in astrophysic and whit french's mother tongue it is quiet fast. ;-) Never the less fascinating !

[@rebelforgod]

If one Folds Space, the Virtual Particles escaping Quantum Annilation will be Negative behind you to create Negative Gravity, and Positive in front of you to create Positive Gravity,,, if Antimatter has Negative Gravity/Mass.

[@LostAnFound]

2:20

[@normanchilds251]

Imagine going the speed of light, you come upon a dust cloud of various sizes of sand, pebbles, and rocks. It like being blasted by a huge shotgun.

[@Stickman_Productions]

I think they also made a photon shield that makes rocks and astroids go away in another design

[@MisterTrotts]

Oh, I don't know, sending probes to other universes seems quite useful, actually. xD

[@hughslone5072]

Just plain nutty

[@GM-rs2fv]

Dude taking a bunch of pictures was obnoxious. Otherwise awesome content

[@joemasters2270]

The real-life Zephram Cochrane. 😉

[@DSRRingMaster]

Saying to go faster then light is to go backwards in time is not definitive but he says it as if it is. According to his light cone you could go forward and backwards it time depending on your direction in space. When in reality light has no since of direction. Light expands outwards in all directions from its event and with his own cone he states light goes forwards and backwards it time. If that is the case you would see the light before the event which is never the case. Light always goes forwards in time from its event. To go faster then light is to get somewhere before light does. If FTL travel is possible time would have no effect on it nor would FTL have any effect on time. Especially when you take the fact to move at the speed of light in any given craft. The craft would be destroyed by being ripped apart. Unless you eliminate time from the equation. But by doing so you then eliminate space itself according to Einstein's professor. Which is where this whole theory falls apart. A bubble.... No... you cannot make a single invisible bi-functional bubble that can push space away in front and pulls it together on the other side. To do this you would need electromagnetism which no matter the angle you face it can only create a toroid shaped bubble, in which the center of the craft would be ripped apart due to the difference in space/time. Because space is filled as fast as it is moved, just as in any other fluid. You cannot make an empty pocket of space. You can cancel space/time. By doing causes space to fill itself in from all directions including from the opposite side of a craft thus pushing said craft past the void as it it was never there.

[@DSRRingMaster]

Dr MKUltra my comment does sound complicated but simplified... For FTL you need to displace or destroy space in front of the craft... time actually has nothing to do with FTL. His double sided light cone is invalid.

[@DSRRingMaster]

Space can be destroyed we are just unaware how. Possibly by canceling all frequency waves in that area.... Which would mean space itself doesn't actually exist as physical spot we can occupy... rather an area we disrupt. If this is true space moves around us not us in it.

[@DSRRingMaster]

Also if nothing can be destroyed then nothing can be created... Which this theory of space still works. But if that's the case how where we created? Or the universe for that matter.

[@DSRRingMaster]

Doing it that way would no doubt destroy every universe lol... but if nothing can be destroyed there is no "if you have enough energy" but yes using that much energy in 1 place would no doubt suck all matter into 1 blank void before another (big bang)

[@DSRRingMaster]

Dr MKUltra and I do agree with you that everything can be described as fields... As I'm sure you know fields can be cancelled out

[@travisbehringer7170]

think of this if all things in the universe are positive energy then perhaps the universe or fabric there of could be negative, positive cannot exist without negative for balance.please research and let me know. or perhaps the ship your in could some how be made negative. check out t townsend brown work.

[@robinhyperlord9053]

666 subs...

[@RobertHarrisMIB]

I dont understand how you one can take such an exciting concept and morph it into a snooze fest! Lol, I found it boring.

[@cyberneticinterfacemodular3996]

Not an Engineer.

[@someynamero3346]

Hmm... If we cannot travel faster than light then how aliens come in their UFOs?

[@JJs_playground]

Maybe they have warp drive or matter/anti-matter drives

[@michaelspeakman8924]

We need a force shield. Or your fiction means absolutely nothing

[@davidmadison9369]

The ancient aliens already told us how to do this but we forgot. 🤦🏾‍♂️

[@stephenangus7296]

negative mass and or negative energy is any mass or energy less than one. Simply put 0.9 is negative. 9 x 1/10 or 9 x 10 to the power of negative one. This becomes more obvious as you explore the values of the nanometre, or the scale of the atom, the quark. This is very important as well as significantly impactful on the geometry or measurement at the subatomic scale. When actual values at the scale of the atom balance with or cancel out far larger values. 1000/1 is nullified by1/1000. Think about it. A kilometre being rendered as one metre by the action of 0.1 of a millimetre. Seems impossible. Irrational. When you follow the understanding, the explanation of the purpose of prime numbers. Unending decimals or fractions that are not simplified. In fact, you start seeing what anti-matter is mathematically. Gravity waves appear oddly.

[@HebaruSan]

Less than one what? One kg? One newton-meter?

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

Angus: NOBODY UNDERSTANDS NOR GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOUR UNIMPORTANT BABBLE!!!

[@elizabetha8565]

Galileo gets all the credit for so many stolen ideas.

[@D.Enniss]

All humans do is "steal" ideas from the past. *We stand on the shoulders of giants*

[@radykakapur78onamikathakur78]

The stupendous cloud conventionally concentrate because humor histochemically surprise pro a waggish active. careful, amazing velvet

[@michaelspeakman8924]

Lie more,

[@SuperTomcatUk]

Anti Gravity was conquered in 1957. So get your facts straight..... S Greer

[@stephenangus7296]

Disturbing to hear someone who is working with gravity scientifically to say gravity is weakest of all energies. What holds the earth together and keeps the earth orbiting the sun? LoL No wonder you cannot find gravitons and you get paid, went to Uni. How did you come up with the theory of warp ,etc.

[@richardobousy3910]

Of the four fundamental forces of nature (gravity, electromagnetism, weak nuclear, strong nuclear) gravity is one thousand trillion trillion trillion times weaker than the next 'weakest' force. So he is correct to say that.

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

+Stephen Angus It's disturbing to hear somebody who shows NO MATH to go around calling PROFESSIONAL PHYSICISTS "disturbing" for not agreeing with your IDIOCY BULLSHIT SPECULATION. Show us YOUR MATH that claims that gravity is NOT the weakest of all FORCES (not "energies")

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

+Alexey Dragunov Good for you, Alexey, for calling Stephen on his bullshit. But YOU are just as bad. First, what a DUMBSHIT comparison: Tesla and Einstein worked on separate problems. Tesla was an engineer: trying to solve certain physical problem. Einstein worked on solving certain theoretical problems. ALL are necessary. NOTHING of Einstein was "plagiarism". Show me where he did NOT give credit where it was due. Yes - MANY mathematicians and physicists discussed and worked on overlapping problems. But, EACH CONTRIBUTES THEIR OWN ORIGINAL PIECE of the puzzle. Einstein just happened to contribute the BIGGEST piece, the BIGGEST connection. Telsa did not understand SHIT about relativity.

[@janreznak881]

Nice try Schlomo. I'm sure you'll get an extra shekel for that one at the JIDF. And you squat like western spy. Heels to ground cyka!

[@Tempestni02]

It's weak because you can pick up a metal ball with a simple magnet against the gravitational pull of the entire Earth.