Status 8 July 23: Status -- Being Shadow Banned

[@tucsonguy62]

Truth is shadow banned.

[@manipulativer]

Mike McCulloch connected casimir effect and hubble constant and found quantized inertia. He has 2 working proof of concept experiments of propelant-less propulsion

[@rdistinti]

I will take a look -- thank you

[@DeathValleyDazed]

I’m not a scientist or engineer so propelantless-propulsion sounds like a perpetual motion scam? Hope I’m completely wrong with my knee jerk reaction🤞

[@manipulativer]

@@DeathValleyDazed Actually people doing electron tunneling using casimir effect and literally getting energy out of vacuum. (this is a very recent experiment) Personally my belief is that its not free energy but relocation of energy - meaning that you are slowing down inertial processes to gain electricity or perhaps heat losing energy and becoming cold in the process. There are also claims that if you were to have inertial propulsion you could expand x amount of energy to lift a weight and collecting y gravity energy where y>x But ultimately inertial propulsion is meant as use x amount of energy to gain z amounts of speed without needing a propelant. We cant go to the nearest star with propelant propulsion as you would need millions of tonnes of propelant with you where as Mike McCulloch propulsion, using nasa's nuclear reactor as energy source we could reach alpha centauri in 12 years with deaceleration included.

[@DeathValleyDazed]

@@manipulativer thanks for your detailed comment.

[@driatrogenesis]

@@manipulativer electron tunneling and negative resistance are nothing new at all so your theory sounds nice and all, but i dont see humans even going to mars anytime soon

[@weinerdog137]

I found you(thank Fractal Woman) so your challenges are diminishing.

[@gcerri524]

Mr Distinti, how do you explain the absence of ether 'friction' in interplanetary space (analog to aerodynamics on earth)?. If there is an ether that drag us to earth why this drag is absent on interplanetary space? if we move thru interplanetary space at high rate of speed, the relative ether speed would be faster than the ether speed falling to earth; why we do not have loss of speed on the ship? we just experience inertia when speed changes, but no drag maintaining the speed thru space, or is it?

[@rdistinti]

The gravity is not ethereal drag -- acceleration relative to the medium is inertia which is the force of gravity (not the field of gravity -- explained in the electrogravity series -- see the updated channel www.youtube.com/@etherealmechanics5686 ). velocity relative to the medium is drag which is exceptionally small and its effects are too small to measure directly.

[@gcerri524]

@@rdistinti Understood, but that is not what you showed in one of your videos; the one with graph paper, the nut and the ship frame…the graph paper (ether) moving down dragging the nut was analog to gravity, or was it?. (Video EM03 01). Was not the earth consuming ether the reason for gravity? I may have miss-understood you explanation…

[@rdistinti]

@@gcerri524 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mmbdZJ2geb2sgLM I explicitly state that in the analog, the velocity of the paper represents ethereal acceleration. The Earth consuming the Ether generates the gravitational field. the Gravitational force is inertia. Earth consuming ether causes ether to accelerate earthward. Acceleration of the medium relative to an object is inertia which is how a gravitational field couples to matter. need to separate the cause (field) and effect (force)

[@gcerri524]

@@rdistinti I see what you are saying...the differential of speed (acceleration) produces a sort of an induction of inertia on the mass, like you comment on other videos.

[@michaelw4442]

I suggest 10pin SWD... And FreeCad to replace Fusion 360

[@rdistinti]

Thank you

[@asfnobambu]

I understood less than 10% of it... but love anyway. Thank you for your dedication. When you have a Free Energy generator I will be inline to order one. As I do now own a credit card can not be a "Patreon". If one day you start accepting crypto let us know... Best.

[@Jsmith32t]

Can send cracked Catia if want

[@The_Green_Man_OAP]

Get on to John Chappell and do a talk. That might help you.

[@rdistinti]

Never heard of John Chappell? I will look him up -- thank you.

[@noneofyourbusines244]

take a breath... "man forms the tool, then the tool forms man" m mcluhan... dont get lost in the data acquisition.... faraday had no adc to prove his theories.... your theories should be more important than the platform that proves or disproves them