Stephen Hawking Lecture - How to Escape Out of a Black Hole

[@MuonRay]

Rest in Peace Professor Stephen Hawking after a lifetime of Physics, Astrophysics, Quantum Mechanics and the Mysteries of the Cosmos.

[@Howard.jr.Wilson]

Muon Ray rest in peace ❤

[@arunsookoo4902]

wtf dude, don't joke about that

[@luvbird]

Read his name... Just ignore these kind of people... Focus on the positives and continue to ignore the negatives. Let us not waste our limited energy on simple minds.

[@sethamine]

Mass Shootings??? NOT MY PROBLEM!!! You’re edgy af

[@luvbird]

SethDorito He already got reported so don't worry about it just keep him off this page and stop replying to him. Only draws his attention back here.

[@YouHolli]

Actual talk starts at 05:50

[@michrain5872]

I wish i read the comments before lol

[@timelkin838]

YouHolli you saved my life!!! At least 5 minutes of it. Thank you. Every moment counts.

[@220p2]

i did not hear anyone talk

[@aristes1880]

Thank you!

[@rileybaker329]

Thanks for that😃

[@austinroberts5957]

After his passing I always find my self coming back to a few videos, including this one. It all seems empty knowing we lost a man that gave everything it seemed possible to try to further humanity. Farewell Professor Stephen Hawking, you’ll be missed.

[@sapphic_seraphim]

Came back to this lecture shortly after the news of Stephen's passing. May he rest peacefully amongst the stars from whence we came. Thank you for being a teacher and an inspiration to us all. Your work and legacy will live on for generations to come.

[@thetoad7367]

Orion Jackson why you talking like that for? Y'know, using words like "whence" why not just say "from where we came"

[@sapphic_seraphim]

Cause I can? Is there a problem?

[@arunsookoo4902]

if you gonna complain, do it somewhere else.

[@gunnerapple6173]

he inspired me to never watch star wars. lol

[@Shawn6751]

He isn't resting among the stars. He has been played like a fiddle and I can tell that he was a horrible human being outside of the public eye.

[@adrianomondini8795]

Today the Professor is passed away..... Its all very sad. Thank you very much for your genius. Thanks

[@adrianomondini8795]

? Can you read my words? I am very sad for him...

[@formerunsecretarygeneralba9536]

galaxybeing1 someone is only dead when he's forgotten.

[@formerunsecretarygeneralba9536]

galaxybeing1 you do know that's metaphor right? Do i really need to explain what i meant. Well it meant if someone is still persuading his hopes and dreams (that is to understand the universe) that he's never truly dead (metaphorically) since his hopes and dreams still lives on. One day he'll influence others just like how einstein was an influence to him.

[@MuonRay]

Professor Stephen Hawking gave this very interesting and fun lecture at the University of Southern California College of Letters, Arts and Sciences in which he gives us a brief history of black holes and a way in which we might be theoretically able to travel through them. “If you feel you are in a black hole, don’t give up,” says Professor Hawking. Black holes are the remains of stars that have collapsed under their own gravity, producing gravitational forces so strong that even light can’t escape. Anything that falls inside is thought to be ripped apart by the massive gravity, never to been seen or heard from again. What you may not know is that physicists have been arguing for 40 years about what happens to the information about the physical state of those objects once they fall in. Quantum mechanics says that this information cannot be destroyed, but general relativity says it must be - that’s why this argument is known as the information paradox. Now Hawking says this information never makes it inside the black hole in the first place. “I propose that the information is stored not in the interior of the black hole as one might expect, but on its boundary, the event horizon,” The event horizon is the sphere around a black hole from inside which nothing can escape its clutches. Hawking is suggesting that the information about particles passing through is translated into a kind of hologram - a 2D description of a 3D object - that sits on the surface of the event horizon. “The idea is the super translations are a hologram of the ingoing particles,” he said. “Thus they contain all the information that would otherwise be lost.” In the 1970s Hawking introduced the concept of Hawking radiation - photons emitted by black holes due to quantum fluctuations. Originally he said that this radiation carried no information from inside the black hole, but in 2004 changed his mind and said it could be possible for information to get out. Just how that works is still a mystery, but Hawking now thinks he’s cracked it. His new theory is that Hawking radiation can pick up some of the information stored on the event horizon as it is emitted, providing a way for it to get out. But don’t expect to get a message from within, he said. “The information about incoming particles is returned, but in a chaotic and useless form. This resolves the information paradox. For all practical purposes, the information is lost.” Last year Hawking made headlines for saying “there are no black holes” - although what he actually meant was a little more complicated, as he proposed replacing the event horizon with a related concept, an apparent horizon. “The message of this lecture is that black holes ain’t as black as they are painted. They are not the eternal prisons they were once thought,” Hawking said. “Things can get out of a black hole both on the outside and possibly come out in another universe.”

[@sherlockholmeslives.1605]

I am glad that there are people who are cleverer than me.

[@ossiedunstan4419]

Stephen hawking is an absolute fucking joke , he thinks he is a god but in reality is full of shit, I lost all respect for hawkings when he named a radiation that has not been found to date after himself how fucking religious or god like is that . hawking is no longer a scientists to me but the leader of the hawkings cult, he is almost as bad as that dumb cunt machio kaku

[@sherlockholmeslives.1605]

Ossie! Please relax yourself into facts, these famous theoretical physicists such as Stephen W. Hawking and Machio Kaku are the cleverest people on the planet! I am clever but I am not really comparable to men as great as these!

[@ossiedunstan4419]

i did not say they where not famous i said they are fucking ego masturbaters, maichio`s who do science no favors. Machio`s only claim to fame is in a paper from the 70`s concerning string theory of which he did very little work on. Machio is no more a fuckign scientists than god is real. when make judgement and try to convince the public of hollywood prop into what it actually is when the original man describes very clearly is not a fucking scientist.Hawking was good scientist until his ego took over name a product of nature with no evidence after himself is ego maniacal bordering on declaring himself a god. i cannot have any more respect for scientists of this standard any more than i can have respect for flat earthers. get over it my view is mine and i take that view from watching these pair of assholes degenerate science to a form of religion. They are bye far not even closest to the cleverest people on earth, hawking is not even close to the highest IQ on the planet and machio well his claims , show his IQ sub 30 at least. Real science gets my respect not aliens , light sabers or fucking hawking radiation claims

[@ossiedunstan4419]

no not at all i do not make claims and then name after myself, Einstien never named the theory of relativity , Einstiens relativity. And from reading some of his last papers , yes i so think i am smarter than he was at the end, the claims he makes in his last paper border on religious fanaticism. I am a free being and i can make any comments on someone who makes claims based on his fame

[@mikej941126]

Rest In Peace Stephen Hawking. The lectures will forever exist to teach and influence many~ And many condolonces to the family

[@bobbillings]

Rest in peace Dr, Hawking. You are an infinite legacy..

[@cml7422]

Rest In Peace Stephen Hawking

[@CreativeQueenx]

Respect to this man. He has always been a legend and devoted all his life on research for us people. RIP. 😯😢

[@MuonRay]

Very well said, I think he will be immortal by his work and impact as a working scientist and as a messenger of science to a global audience.

[@bobdarbo7801]

Muon Ray everything he "invented" is all theory and guessing, not science.

[@gav3396815]

I have just seen this (as it always does) when i fell upon it through the all amazing Face book links :-) AND i am so happy that i have this opportunity. Incredible soul and i am presently studying with Dr & Master Rulin Xiu and what an incredible journey it is walking the bridge that is between Science and Spirituality -- GUT and String Theory -- The yin/yang and SO much more. YET the one quote that is said daily by the whole team is that which Stephen speaks about the "Cosmos" -- "YOU are infinitely LOVED, Supported & Protected by the WHOLE Cosmos, ..... Divine ...... & Tao" --- You are an incredible Soul Prof Stephen Hawking and what an honour to listen to your wisdom. TY TY THANK YOU for the contribution to humanity now and for ever more.

[@ablebaker8664]

The IQ of the comments section varies in inverse proportion to the educational interest of the video.

[@mandarindrago165]

Doinks tho

[@maro4241]

Me explaining to my parents that an online game can't be paused

[@kamalmanzukie]

'there is no space for a creator' the crowd goes wild

[@coreydallmeyer67]

Professing themselves to be wise,they became fools

[@mrpk123456789247]

STEPHEN HAWKING R.I.P. AGE 76 14/03/2018,

[@bizajunior]

03 :)

[@Slap7481]

mrpk123456789247 03/14

[@DMV8662]

Do gematria on these numbers... =666

[@jonipradhan239]

Stephen hawkings actually speaks at 5:50

[@GalacTHIQQ]

RIP Stephen Hawking. He's in a better place now.

[@Grimace_Integ420]

a place where he can actually move, talk, and be normal, hopefully

[@Grimace_Integ420]

a place where i bet he wished he was in the first place, but to me honest, speaking with artificial intelligence is awesoe sounding, dontcha think?!?!?!

[@DeepSingh-hz4nu]

No he is not. Once your dead, nothing exists. Did you not listen to the lecture? There is no space for a creator.

[@DMV8662]

@@Grimace_Integ420 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 do you really think that??? He denounced God his entire life??? Shame on you....🙄

[@funluvnrm]

You are loved & will be missed, brightest blessings always. 1 of your predictions did not turn out, as you thought you would have passed sooner, but you did not & I am so happy that on this prediction that you were wrong, even though I wish it would had been longer as you will be missed by many, ;)... You have a very wise mind, big heart & a spirit of the known, as well as the unknown by many, as well as a soul full of gold... ~"RIP Stephen Hawking's"~

[@josimatson7564]

Hawking protecc . . Hawking attacc . . . But most importantly, Hawking said black holes ain’t so blacc!

[@stephanegagne403]

A great human being who made his mark in science dispite his handicap and far beyond predictions medically given 2 years to live ..he was a strong willed and determined person ..rest in peace Steven you will eternally be remembered for all of your works and lifehood contributions

[@DMV8662]

Hes not resting in peace I bet... Anyone who denounces the creator God suffers eternal damnation in the Lake of Fire... Sweating his little nuts off I BET...🙄🙄🙄

[@deutch8bp175]

Steven hawkings will start to speak at 5:52

[@johnthompson2002]

Rip Stephen Hawking truly the greatest man of the 21st century

[@joemasters2270]

RIP Prof. Stephen Hawking - I love how this was not only informative but he drew a few laughs from the audience. :)

[@madatchatur222]

Dr. Professor Stephen Hawkings, the whole planet misses you! May be you left this planet to meet with Albert Einstein? No words to describe your ingenuity!

[@srinivasaraghavan4837]

Cosmologist Stephen Hawking is in characteristic best presentation...good show on black holes

[@Krillep]

It's the power of Hulkamania right here, brother.

[@ivan3562]

Rest in peace prof. Howling. You were and will be an inspiration for many people...

[@DMV8662]

Hes HOWLING in the fire pit. He denounced the existence of God. Sooooo???🙄

[@barbarayoung2846]

@@DMV8662 Most scientists do. Because there is no evidence for the existence of God.

[@_half_space]

I had this thought once that if gravity is weaker as you move to the center of a mass then space and time pressing against a planet could be the reason why we have gravity. I imagined it as a very thin substance, and i once also had a pipe dream that we could escape a blackhole on purpose. It made me kind of sad to know that light was constant and that it could never escape which would mean that we could never do it, but people like this trying to prove it is possible make me happy. You guys are so fucking rad.

[@wasimakramullah176]

Hawking mind is brilliant 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

[@LindsayKay]

Only synth voice that ever gave me warm fuzzies.

[@kaleemelahiamjad8455]

Hawking is ,no doubt all times the great mind

[@-_Nuke_-]

*In ancient times* the Earth was thought of being the center of our solar system (or whatever people called then - what we now call a solar system). The problem with that model (apart from being false) was that gave these philosophers a difficult time, formulating a working model that would abide with observational evidence from the planets in the night sky and be simple enough to make predictions with... Their solution sadly, was to use circles... Their saying was that circles could solve everything, and if you ever encounter a planet or a moon that seems to go this way and then turn around and go the other way and then back again (as we observe them to do) or show some other similar anomaly in their path in the night sky, the answer could be given if we think of their orbits as part of circles within a circle within a circle and so on... Now, that way of thinking was difficult, confusing and wrong at the same time and seemed to be "working" only for the standards of the time. But inevitably, it was just false. The correct answer was that we are just not the center of our solar system and its the Sun that is in the center and we are orbiting the Sun and not the other way around. And if you allow for that, you no longer need this intricate, weird and complicated method that was used before to explain planet orbits. You just have a simple, elegant model of the entire solar system, that requires just one thing. To dare to accept that you are not in the center of the universe or the solar system for that matter. That was a tremendous roadblock for philosophers that just couldn't go beyond this unintuitive (for the time) realisation. But it's true! It's not the Sun that orbits the Earth, its the Earth orbiting the Sun. Our own perception was the very obstacle between a simpler model and a huge philosophical (and egotistical) let down. *The second time* this happened was with Einstein. Gravity before Einstein was thought as a force that pushed or pulled objects downwards, or towards each other (if placed in a vacuum in zero G). But Einstein found something very surprising about Gravity that nobody before had even thought of! In Einstein's view of the universe, it's not the apple falling towards the Earth, its the Earth "rushing upwards" and meeting the apple! What!? How is that so? Most people even today cannot understand this revolutionary way of thinking from Einstein, because our very perception is obscuring our vision of our reality... But as Einstein showed, if we let an apple fall in a vacuum, we can make the experiment in a curtain way, so there is no way of knowing if the apple falls in a vacuum inside some gravitational field, or just dropped in a room accelerating upwards in zero gravity! Therefore gravity doesn't exist! Gravity is just an illusion of our perception. The tough part was to understand, that when you leave an apple fall in a vacuum, what happens is that the apple doesn't fall! It stays stationary in the same position where you left it! Exactly because there is nothing attached to the object, there are no forces acting on the object. So why should the object move? Exactly, it shouldn't! Its stays stationary. The thing though, is that everything moves in both space and time (for example... the Earth), but if you have something that suddenly only moves in time and not in space (as the apple does) and if space and time are curved, then you get the illusion of a falling object, where instead you are moving in both space and time, and the apple only just in time and not in space (remember there are no forces acting on the apple when you let it) [...] [...] That would mean that if you follow a straight path in a curved spacetime (in both space and time) and the apple only follows a straight path in a curved spacetime but only moving in the time dimension and stays stationary in the other 3 dimensions of space, you *as an inside observer* will see the apple fall, when in reality its *you* that fall towards the object and not the other way around. The reason why you can't observe it, is that spacetime has 4 dimensions and you can only see 3 of them. But Einstein was right! Spacetime is indeed curved by mass and Gravity is not a force. Its an interaction between mass and spacetime. Nothing is pulling the object down, in fact the object doesn't even move. That is also the explanation to why inside a vacuum, both a feather and a mountain will fall at *exactly the same rate and hit the ground at exactly the same time* (if you could fit a mountain and a feather inside a vacuum that is...) Why is that so? Well it's because none of the "falling" objects, actually fall. The don't fall, as we said that's just the illusion of our perception. What happens is (as we said) that they (the objects) follow straight lines in curved spacetime. And since their movement in space is zero (because they don't fall) and they both move in time at the same rate (because all objects age at the same rate (!)) we see this weird result! Both a feather and a mountain age at the same rate, and because this movement in time is translated by our senses as "gravity" we see them fall together at the same rate *exactly because* the age at the same rate! It has nothing to do with their mass or anything else! And everything to do with time! So both the Heliocentric model and Einstein's general theory of relativity, went beyond our primal perception of the world, showing us how the world really works not matter how absurd it might be to our senses! *So where are we now...?* Right now, we are trying to explain everything with particles... And so far that seems to work pretty good for us, except that it doesn't... And quantum mechanics is the tale tale sign of that problem. From our first ages of philosophy we trying to invision that everything consists | and can be explained with, particles within particles, within particles... First was the atom, that was latter shown to consist of smaller particles called protons, neutrons and electrons... They too are now thought to contain even smaller particles called quarks... And we didn't stop there! Every single force can be (and shoul be) explained by particles, (apart from Gravity) in fact we try to force Gravity to abide to that rule and so far we've failed... Maybe we are facing again just another obstacle of our perception... Maybe there is some kind of simpler model our particles and forces that we hadn't think of, because like the heliocentric model and like the non falling objects idea it's just too wild to even think of it. Maybe exactly like we can't explain everything with circles, within circles within other circles (like the philosopher of old did) we can't explain everything with particles, within particles within particles... And its maybe in vain and wrong trying to understand the universe like that.

[@HieiYoukai]

32:56 best part :)

[@richardt8604]

I have been in a black hole for years , very difficult to get out of ! didn't get any sound psychiatric advice from this lecture !

[@drwho6908]

Mr.Hawking Rest in Peace.

[@kritagyagurung1194]

I wonder how hard it was and how many years it took for him to find out about this If he wasn’t like this at age 21,He could’ve found out alot of other things.All thanks to his caring family/parents/everyone who helped him.Doctors said he was going to leave for two-years but look at this perseverence.

[@MommaWolf1967]

You can not and I repeat can not escape a Black Hole

[@radhammaa8733]

RIP stephen sir

[@nightrous3026]

I beleive black holes are universes themselves, because our universe also has an event horizon, because the farther out stuff is, the faster its expanding. And there is an area where all light is redshifted because of this. And just beyond that zone of redshift, is just blackness; an event horizon. Because space is moving at the speed of light there, so light cant get to us, and mass moving at that speed becomes pure energy anyways, so theres nothing to observe other than energy, but you cant observe that energy, because again, space is moving at C. Again, an event horizon.

[@Chemistry99978]

Very nice discussion 👍

[@sheenufilms]

RIP Steven Hawking

[@Nightweaver1]

So Hawking says that black holes are "voids" in space, but that really can't be true. There must be some super-dense object at the center, a source of the gravitational well.

[@paulinecole7747]

Thank you. It is very relevant stuff to use with someone who is at giving up point. There is no space for a creator, the laws of physics are sufficient to explain the biggest question. Laws of physics have equations. The most fundamental equation for me is: zero = infinity. What I get out of this equation is that the creation of numbers in the mind of living creatures, based on the concept of a number line, is the fundamental step. Purely my thoughts which can probably not be proven right or wrong, however, I simply wanted to share them in case others would like to reflect on this suggestion.

[@ruthruthie2931]

Pauline Cole secular science will prove the existence of a creator, soon.

[@stinkypinky1443]

What the fuck are you talking about. In no way does zero equal infinity.

[@Oozes_Dark]

Meaningless

[@mokaska]

-Multiverses (there is a universe where the same bit of information is preserved, ie. it's not sucked in) -Holographic principle. It's "painted" on the event horizon. Kurzgesagt has a good video on how this might be possible (titled "Information paradox").

[@coopergates9680]

Jacob - He probably means projective geometry, such as the singularity of a stereographic projection, or maybe other singularities.

[@adamkunzun]

Love u Mr. Hawking cool guy. sincere reasonable rational & logical Minded Among the physical scientist who served humanity .👍🌷👏👏

[@ricvel690]

If someone tries to imitate him, I believe that maybe the absence of this unique 'sense of 'humor"' could give a clue...

[@latteboyssmile]

Thank you for your satisfaction of work.

[@emrahkorkmaz87]

It was such a nice guy; I really miss him.

[@rayzorrayzor9000]

Now a post with my science head on, we link space and time together as one , spacetime, but isn’t time just a mere way of measuring change ? For instance if everything was static in the universe then we would measure no change so “time” would not exist. If you keep this idea in mind then understanding why “time” changes from different perspectives becomes a lot easier to grasp. Ooops I gotta go I’m late, I’m running out of “time” lol

[@Kimtwister]

REST IN PEACE STEPHEN HAWKING

[@omkhard1833]

Can we get the information of black holes from its image.

[@kennethchow213]

Kruskal Co-ordinates of Schwarzschild spacetime, Kerr black hole geometry, and Reissner NordStrom geometry, all imply that black holes are not one-way cul-de-sac, but that matter falling into a lack hole, are recycled back through "Einstein Rosen Bridge", commonly called "worm hole" out of a back door of the black hole, called "white hole", in the form of beta decay radiation. This should be the real origin of Hawking Radiation, not the origin, viz, virtual particles pairs, one going into the black hole, the other escaping becoming a real particle, etc.,as described by Hawking himself, or by Bekenstein.

[@Inertia888]

Prof. Hawking on the Comet Rocket, falling into a black hole^^

[@jaysilverheals4445]

Stephen Hawking is the greatest no doubt about it however it causes confusion to the public that they are not told how his voice is done. The public has a right to know that he is not twitching muscles or "thinking thoughts''--that then come out as words. The perception of the public is that he sits and speaks through a device. The fact is that the keepers found a robotic voice that the public is comfortable with and then they write the speech--based upon his writings and run it. The speech is then delivered with a robotic voice instead of a narrator..He is not literally sitting giving the lecture--he simply is sitting there but the odds are high he can hear and understand whats being said. Its quite well documented that he has a device next to his cheek muscle to respond "yes or no"--however he has no device reading his thoughts which then speak through a device. He has no device that can deliver a full address flawlessly--they are prepared-glitches fixed--put in the can then the robotic voice is played to the audience. Hawking then sits during the speech.

[@mntutube]

Thank you for your explanation. As I can I understand he hears everything what is said around him. What I don't understand is his responds. How is he responding to the questions? Question is given him in advance so that he can prepare an answer. Or he he is responding real time by using face reading machine. Is there a system that reads his thoughts? Would you further explain please. Thank you.

[@wendyallman7141]

Can’t believe he’s gone 😢😢😢😭😭😭

[@aleafonatree1889]

Teacher: so class what is a black hole That one smart kid:

[@huejazz6939]

Sweet, this will come in handy if my planet breaks down.

[@bratton79]

Rest in Peace, Stephen Hawking.

[@brainbash4551]

Nice job

[@ghirardellichocolate201]

School children agreed every so often to knock me down. Both me and my brother.

[@spicypickle666]

this lecture is actually from 2009, not 2015

[@azharabbas5108]

and i am watching in 2016

[@rillloudmother]

I always secretly hope that your channel name is a pun on Man Ray.

[@ivorywhite892]

Oh Steven ,if the USA published the hole in the atmosphere is heating the world up. Then you know a hole would release heat and we would be very cold. Steven you are correct have less than you calculated. You knew it though.

[@timmahoney2541]

Two things. Since no one, including Hawking, has any cognitive relationship with a duplicate of himself, or anyone else, the theoretical existence of a multiverse, or parallel universes containing another "version" of themselves is inconsequential, if not absurd. If the alternate conditions in this "other place" could contain one's "soul" (the same soul?), yet allow that the alternate individual manifestations would result in different outcomes, and, they don't talk 🤫, how could it possibly be the same "person"? Certainly, why would it matter? Secondly, lest you say, "But Tim, Hawking theorizes that we might be able to traverse a black hole and be magically transported to another world (Universe), so we must stay open to the possibility that we could someday meet our doppelganger.", I say, nonsense. No human, in present physical form, is ever going to survive the physics of a black hole, assuming that it could even be a wormhole (or any functional equivalent that you might want to define). I am certainly no Hawking, but I am aware enough to know the basic limitations of our physical world. If you want to live in a theoretical place and imagine that anything is possible, more power to you. But know that your hypothetical, undiscovered, alternate selves will never know what your thinking, nor will you know what's on their minds,

[@jamesmterrell]

Now that he has left this mortal coil, he will really know whether his faith was correct.

[@tonyjohnson9889]

Reading title and immediately thought swim perpendicular to the current or plasma flow...

[@angelinalu7414]

wow mind-blowing

[@SuperNovaJinckUFO]

Theoretically, you could go into a black hole in our universe, come out in another universe, and then go into a black hole in that universe that's not in ours and come back.

[@acarvey]

*wormhole. As far as anyone knows, the tidal forces of any modest black hole would rip and tear your body apart before you reached even close to its depths.

[@ASWAJA2023]

but there are many black holes so which one we can know that black hole connects with our universe?

[@hannahpumpkins4359]

But as Hawking stated, a super-massive Black Hole would not; you could easily reach the Event Horizon, and then enter. Hawking also has stated that he believes that before the singularity at the 'end' of the BH, there will be a Worm Hole which would allow you to escape, though who know where that WH would lead to.

[@merlinjones2660]

one still thinks of you professor your job was to understand a blackhole my job was to prove your thesis by getting the human race there to prove it safely and use it for space farming

[@SOLARWARDEN4KHDR]

Mr Hawkins Was A Alien!

[@virakthong8022]

I like it when he says the last word ( No creator ) Did you hear that Christian Missionaries?

[@FlibbidyFleu]

What does Mr. Hawkins opinion have to do with Christian Missionaries?

[@FlibbidyFleu]

Also the question, from a USC student, was deliberately provocative, and very worded poorly. It was more of a statement than a question. Mr. Hawking's position on God/creationism is well known, and is of little consequence.

[@gabcalvert5856]

I think what mr.Hawkings means is like a painter without canvas.

[@jaferalesh3058]

Go to hell you and your professor

[@Jamil_Biz_Talk]

Read Quran GOD says everything about big bang black holes sun moon earth everything before 14 hundred years ago. Then u believe God is creator.

[@muhdadifarman1669]

I want to see Professor stephen Hawkins

[@jasonbishop1092]

he's right about A Star.... that burns up there gas...

[@uwotm8929]

"even a light can't escape" Albert Einstein (triggered)

[@louisbarasa5741]

Good QCD Talk!

[@markmd9]

Uncertainty principle was formulated by someone who could not understood quantum mechanics, I mean it is wrong by formulation, and Stephen based his whole theory on an uncertain stuff.

[@rayzorrayzor9000]

My last post, I promise. As we look to the stars we realise that everything goes through cycles of change, nothing is static. From the smallest virus to the biggest stars one thing is always common, they change or you could say they like everything evolve .With this in mind then why do we expect the laws of physics to be the only constants in the universe. Perhaps the “gaps” in our understandings are simply due to the fact that we haven’t allowed for the laws of physics to be not so much set in stone but more like a fluid. The laws of physics might change over a big enough time scale, this certainly would account for ‘Dark energy’ and ‘Dark matter’ to name just two mysteries. So given enough time then that apple that hit Newton on his head might replay out as Newton’s head jumping up and head butting the apple whilst it’s still on the tree lol, You May think I’m talking sh*t but it’s sh*t that does makes you think, also don’t forgett great discoveries have been made by scientists challenging the norm instead of believing the same same as everyone else. It certainly does make you think doesn’t it and anything that makes people question things can only be a good thing . OMG I’ve just thought of a downside, I’ve just given flatearthers some fuel to power thier ideas , oooops, I’m so sorry . Do not like or share this comment , the sanity of the rest of us now depends on flatearthers NOT reading this lol

[@ps-ub9tj]

I learned Steven hawking in school

[@Catsincages]

Cheeky.

[@MuonRay]

+Catsincages Stephen Hawking has a great sense of humor.

[@Sumit_Jethuri]

Being Nerdy works😅

[@datrandomdoucheontheintern8103]

Breeki.

[@theboldguy.]

one day i thought about black holes and i got the exact same theory without even study physics ....

[@mariamkamran1388]

Plz tell me how to get out!!!!!!!?!

[@muhdadifarman1669]

I never see professor Stephen Hawkins

[@3John-Bishop]

Steven can walk now, he got out of that wheelchair and is free now.

[@DMV8662]

Anyone that denounces the VERY EXISTENCE OF GOD does not have that luxury... Sorry... Hes in Hell....

[@lydsylver9304]

les étoiles filantes sont des étoiles qui se sont bloquées dans le déplacement de l'univers comme un baton planté sur une plage sur un retour d'une vague

[@jonaskong8123]

May he rest in peace.

[@armand-itomani3047]

Thank you very much👍🌟🏅

[@KungFuChess]

Safe journey into the next dimension.

[@sonitsonita50]

Úžasné!

[@awaisahmed2907]

Great personality

[@jeet5205]

I love you physics and black hole

[@arashsabour8399]

main message the cosmos doesnt care about itself or anyone else one bit and is a complete failure in every way with a 360 spin on it

[@raymondkowal8379]

What happens in space time stays in space time

[@Oozes_Dark]

Raymond Kowal *a bottomless hole in spacetime

[@lilith7247]

Take a shot every time he says "black hole".

[@joshuamagmar7373]

press F to pay respects

[@arashsabour8399]

a blackhole is a reality suffered by cosmic creation who live soulessly tortured in them

[@solbentley9132]

May he rest in peace

[@moviesfever3243]

I will understand one day.

[@IAmNotHim97]

R.I.P Stephen

[@seadhajdarbegovic]

Hawking is either crazy or smartest man on planet,the one who see what nobody else does

[@rayzorrayzor9000]

Forgett all that science teaches us if you want to know the meaning of life cos it’s staring us right in the face it’s just that we as humans want to feel ‘important’ so we massively complicate what the answer could be, and are you ready for the answer to the meaning of life ? . . . Brace yourselves, infact You had better sit down first , Are you ready ? ? ? . The meaning of life is . . Is . . . Is . . Simply to survive long enough to do it all again tomorrow . Think about it ! Can you prove me wrong ? Now that you realise you can’t then the answer although not automatically correct does suddenly make a lot more sense . So if you too do wake up in the morning then congratulations. . . YOU ARE THE RESULTANT OF THE MEANING OF LIFE . (Sweet dreams) . R.

[@darciedeemorris5951]

why didn't he get a nobel prize???

[@ktsenya2]

Maybe we will meet on the other side, but who really knows?