This is absolutely brilliant, thank you so much! I was completely overwhelmed when I first saw the DNALC video elsewhere, and although it was amazing to watch, I wasn't sure how I was going to learn how any of it worked. Watching it again at the end of the video, I could immediately recognise and name the units :)
@lmtrevino73 жыл бұрын
That was really great! Now I know DNA from the very beginning DNA strand, DNA polymerase, Primase, DNA holoenzyme Pol III, DNA Holder, DNA Sliding Clamp, T, synthesize DNA, base pairs, template (toppled into a Primer-Template Junction) (PTJ), helicase, ATP hydrolyzed and the release of junction and clamp occurs.
@jackyjack96602 жыл бұрын
Its so annoying that people get to think they know dna from very beginning by watching a single video on KZbin... Order of reaction and thermodynamic parameters?... ∆G and binding energy?... Enzyme kinetics?... Nothing is explained in all aspects.. So when you say you know the dna from the start you're wrong...
@patldennis2 жыл бұрын
@@jackyjack9660 You just gave me douche chills. Why not give her some encouragement for being curious and excited about the topic and tell her there's a lot more interesting tstuff to learn about rather than stifling her enthusiasm?
@elfullin Жыл бұрын
@@patldennis preach
@prashantkaushik53907 жыл бұрын
Thanks for such a clear talk
@salahudinbholai66223 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining the various types of dna. Great lesson will rewatch!
@mxmajewski6 жыл бұрын
Simply epic, imma show it to everyone at my molecular biology class
@asishku.pattnayak7643 жыл бұрын
Po
@asishku.pattnayak7643 жыл бұрын
po
@asishku.pattnayak7643 жыл бұрын
P
@asishku.pattnayak7643 жыл бұрын
P
@soldieroflife44494 жыл бұрын
So how did this evolve? I mean how did the DNA evolve machines that read and replicate it? How is it possible for mutations to come up with such a complicated Intelligent process? Blows my mind.
@Drifter4ever Жыл бұрын
It couldn't evolve. But you are not allowed to say that :-)
@joshuasukup24889 ай бұрын
Over time traits that increase replication should become more common. Seems like probabilities to me.
@joshuasukup24889 ай бұрын
Heard initially organisms used RNA for genetic info and enzymes, but then it specialized into DNA (more stable than RNA) for genetic information, and amino chains for enzymes (it is unclear to me why aminoacids became enzymes, but I imagine the choice of 20 bases as opposed to 4 made for more differentiation).
@BushCampingTools7 жыл бұрын
So the sliding base clamp here is paramount. Under what natural conditions (if any) does this fail or are we only talking experimental conditions, in order to elucidate the mechansim(s) here?
@TheRealBrandonGlenn5 жыл бұрын
I understand that the DNA clamps speed up polymerase activity, is it really necessary for the lagging strang to have a DNA clamp? Okazaki fragments are short and shouldnt really require many bases be added. The way it looks in the presentation is that there is a DNA clamp for each Okazaki fragment, how are they all removed?
@rtx40943 жыл бұрын
this until in the loop when the direction is from 5`-3` the polymerase must synthesis the dna strand thats why we need clamp there too and when the pol reaches to the other primer it falls off
@geezerdombroadcast7 жыл бұрын
Think I need some remedial DNA training. Got my Okazaki fragments confused with my polymerases : (
@DrPiero Жыл бұрын
Awesome presentation I really enjoyed watching it as an update on replication and please know I’m a trombone player
@itamar.j.rachailovich2 жыл бұрын
Is there a video explaining about DnaA , DnaC and helicase?
@pramitbanerjee7 жыл бұрын
its my second favorite professor from MIT! (the first is Erik lander)
@BushCampingTools7 жыл бұрын
Sorry my stupid question below, I see if eg ATP transport fails, then no attachment of the sliding clamp, via the loaders , yes?
@michaelvickers86912 жыл бұрын
Sure sounds a lot like a technical lecture involving complex engineering. Imagine trying to design such a complex system then building the various components using bio or synthetic chemistry.
@KenJackson_US6 жыл бұрын
One error per 10^10 replicated base pairs is absolutely ASTOUNDING! The whole design is astounding.
@patldennis2 жыл бұрын
Yet if there were no errors we'd all be genetic clones. Sharing that status with you gives me cold chills. Perfect polymerases obviously are selected against since none are. and wouldn't a supernatural polymerase have 0 errors?
@KenJackson_US2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for reviving my old comment, @@patldennis. It's fun to see that six people agreed with me, probably shortly after I posted it four years ago. It's not clear what point you're trying to make. From prior comments, I assume you're trying to squirm out of the reality of a supernatural creator, regardless of the overwhelming evidence. If that's your aim, you're doing a poor job. We don't know what would have happened had the first couple, in their perfect state, had not sinned. Some theorize that polymerase only became erroneous after that. It seems logical, but there's no data and no way of analyzing it. No experiment is possible, so science must remain mute on that topic.
@patldennis2 жыл бұрын
@@KenJackson_US 6 people agreed with you but look at all the similiar comments that got more likes. Too bad you didn't have the balls to be more explicit in terms of supernatural jibber jabber.
@patldennis2 жыл бұрын
@@KenJackson_US How does sin affect the function of polymerase?
@KenJackson_US2 жыл бұрын
You missed the key points, @@patldennis. I said, _"We don't know ..."_ And also, _"... , but there's no data and no way of analyzing it. ..., so science must remain mute on that topic."_
@graemelaubach31063 жыл бұрын
Wild! Great effing lecture, my man.
@mamltr6 жыл бұрын
A very nice talk.
@peter_smyth5 жыл бұрын
2:40 "Bumbling mass of mutagenised cells" is a great insult!
@paulwary4 жыл бұрын
We need another series of Blackadder.
@mindyourbussines86983 жыл бұрын
Or maybe say cancer lol
@Zelda4564 жыл бұрын
Thank you !🙏
@reinaldolrivera-figueroa72675 жыл бұрын
But is this in eukariot?
@rockapedra11303 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks!
@salahudinbholai66223 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sara Thornton
@markoconnell8042 жыл бұрын
How does the Topoisomerase evolve? If it requires ATP to operate how does it do so during this evolutionary process?
@patldennis2 жыл бұрын
Well in light of the fact that there are multiple topoisomerase in any cell; species or taxon it's pretty obvious they evolved based on their sequence relationships- individual topoisomerase types take on more specific functions in derived taxa. If it uses ATP it is probably a member of the ATPase superfamily of proteins which do lots of different things but have an ATP hydrolyzing domain in common with additional domains tacked on over time.
@rogerscottcathey4 жыл бұрын
ok, that one error bugs me.
@alihasandw955 жыл бұрын
Poor guy when reading the script lol! The course is amazingly helpful tho. thanks
@Isaiaswolf665 жыл бұрын
What happens with 5' primer ?
@patldennis2 жыл бұрын
Ribonuclease H recognizes the specific topology and cuts it out. Short length repair polymerases can then fill that in with DNA.
@aradhyatripathi73267 жыл бұрын
How the ter tus complex replicate DNA ?
@Thomaaasooo7 жыл бұрын
it does not replicate DNA, it stops the replisome in procaryotes from replicating more than half (or a little more) of the cccDNA
@ameliac5043 жыл бұрын
Helicase runs on leading strand
@joshuasukup24889 ай бұрын
That is what I was taught as well, maybe this is a newer understanding?...
@marlenesoifer72194 жыл бұрын
Please contact me want to Have more information as assembly , vaccines as much DNA replication as possible thankyou thus far
@willmcconnell60084 жыл бұрын
Out of curiosity what level of education is the demographic watching videos like these?
@joshuasukup24889 ай бұрын
1 year of technical college general cell biology class
@saramalik54404 жыл бұрын
Do you have notes for this
@samdoors51322 жыл бұрын
Individuals that don’t believe there is a God I hope this kind of knowledge that is passed on to you will change your mind.
@hashhoomy2 жыл бұрын
سبحان الخالق العظيم!
@Drifter4ever Жыл бұрын
He's wrong. There's much more DNA in the human body. You could go back and forth to the sun 500 times instead of just once.