Steve Weinberg - Toward the Unification of Physics | Interactive 2013 | SXSW

Recent news from the CERN laboratory in Geneva has revealed the existence of a heavy unstable particle that had been predicted by the theory that unifies two of the forces of nature. This is the last missing piece of our current theory of known elementary particles, the Standard Model. But there is much left to be done before we have a thoroughly unified theory of all matter and force, and some of this will involve observations from space.

[@biffy7]

No slides, no fancy graphics, pure genius. Damn impressive.

[@uploadJ]

And attributes "dark matter" to a certain un-discovered 'particle' rather than the non-radiating state of Hydrogen known (in some circles) as the "Hydrino".

[@frankdimeglio8216]

@@uploadJ Einstein never nearly understood TIME, E=MC2, F=ma, gravity, or ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. He was, in fact, a total weasel. c2 represents a dimension ON BALANCE, as E=MC2 IS F=ma in accordance with the following: UNDERSTANDING THE ULTIMATE, BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma: The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS this proves the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. SO, ON BALANCE, this proves the fourth dimension. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! By Frank DiMeglio

[@hyunsikjung387]

We need more people like dr. Weinberg in this world.

[@dahghamar]

we have

[@askformyname.4599]

Jesus loves you

[@TaylorMater]

"We still need to look for evidence of gravitational waves." Consider that done Dr. Weinberg.

[@AxelBliss]

the video has (if compared with the average KZbin video) low volume audio, thus it should be louder , there are many programs who can fix it. you simply cut few bass frequencies a little bit, add gain around the 1kHz region, and general gain. You mildly compress to avoid digital distortion. What is that SW something which doesn't understand fundamental sound engineering? Steven Weinberg MUST be audible at ANY African tablet! We love him!

[@dczheng6926]

Dr. Weinberg is good man!

[@TakeTheRedPill_Now]

Wisdom and knowledge without hubris. Not without merit .

[@enlongchiou]

g(p)*(4*3.14/3)/137.036=3.4*10^26=1000*c/pl neutron decay which take 1000 second about 15 minutes within proton pl=g(p)*(4*3.14*pm/3)/c^2 by strong force g(p)=g*m^2/pm^2=g(pl/(4*3.14*l/3))^2=1.13*10^28 from graviton g*m^2 oscillating between proton (pl), Planck’s scale l=gm/c^2=(hg/(2*3.14*c^3))^0.5 deduce 2*3.14*g*m^2=ch=8*3.14*g*(m*c^2/2)^2/c^4 Ludwik’s solution of GR field equation unite 4 force of nature.(c=299792458, pl=8.8*10^-16, pm=1.67262*10^-27, m=2.17647*10^-8, l=1.616*10^-35, g=6.67408*10^-11, h=6.62607*10^-34,)

[@mikhailpavel21]

I had heard his lecture on UTA also. A great mind. He shared his dissatisfaction on failure to build the super collider in UTA also. And the day Higgs Boson discovery was announced, the ghostly tunnels of the collider were printed on the newspaper. That day, I felt a kind of loss and for a moment, I had the feeling that It could have been US and Texas. But again knowledge is knowledge and it should have no boundaries and or any nationality.

[@roystonito]

Overstayed your welcome Steve? I could have sat here all night listening to that fountain of knowledge.

[@starfox1]

actually, the hadron collider's collision energy is in tera electron-volts (TeV)

[@luisfabricio6439]

Rest In Peace 💔

[@doncourtreporter]

Mark, I read that book long, long ago and heard recently that it was out of print. Guess I'll go look again.

[@jeffcolorado]

Great talk, but it would be good if you gave us subtitles for the q & a portion. I couldn't hear the questioners.

[@kennethchow213]

Mass(in kilograms)= Charges squared(in Coulombs squared) x 10 to the power 7 divided by distance(between the charges in meters). That's how Newton's Law of universal gravitation is equivalent to Coulomb's Law, and works for NASA.

[@jalalkhosravi6458]

Most intellectual person in present century,

[@chriss6356]

such a brilliant man. i hope to meet him some day. the man who actually unified 2 of the 4 forces he mentioned, electroweak.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

The page Nexus of Physics has now given the following two writings the thumbs up on their page. ALSO consider this: E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE UNIVERSAL AND MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are described and represented by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational (IN BALANCE). Objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS the SPEED OF LIGHT is RELATIVELY CONSTANT AS WELL. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. In fact, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. So, THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are not "falling" in what is "curved SPACE" in RELATION to what is THE SUN. This is nonsense. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. This truly explains PERPETUAL MOTION. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. By Frank DiMeglio EINSTEIN NEVER UNDERSTOOD PHILOSOPHY, MATHEMATICS, AND PHYSICS, AS HE HAS BEEN TOTALLY OUTSMARTED BY SIR FRANK MARTIN DIMEGLIO: The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is ESSENTIAL. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE. Dream experience is/involves true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. MOST IMPORTANTLY, in dreams, BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE. IMPORTANTLY, dream experience is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. THE EYE is ALSO the body. Dreams improve upon memory AND UNDERSTANDING. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the GENIUS of dreams. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/with what is THE EARTH. NOW, get a good LOOK at what is the translucent, SEMI-SPHERICAL, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE sky. Excellent. The DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. THE EARTH IS also BLUE (as water). F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that, why, and how ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, and describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, it is NECESSARILY a matter of precisely how these equations are understood in a BALANCED, EXTENSIVE, AND INTEGRATED fashion in RELATION to/with WHAT IS THOUGHT. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Get a good LOOK at what is THE EYE. POINTS are points. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. OPEN your EYES. NOW, LOOK at what is the FLAT, SETTING, AND ORANGE SUN (with the SPACE around it THEN going invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE). This ORANGE SUN manifests or forms at what is EYE LEVEL/BODY HEIGHT as well. This ORANGE SUN is manifest ON BALANCE as what is NECESSARILY the BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE of THE EARTH/LAVA. The viscosity of LAVA IS BETWEEN what is manifest as WATER AND THE EARTH/GROUND. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. F=ma AND E=mc2 do provide absolute, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, and CLEAR proof that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THEREFORE, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent with/as what is F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are NOT "falling" in what is "curved SPACE". In fact, this is nonsense. It is PROVEN. By Frank DiMeglio

[@chriss6356]

@@frankdimeglio8216 Slow down on the crack pipe my guy.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

The page Nexus of Physics has now given the following two writings the thumbs up on their page. ALSO consider this: E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE UNIVERSAL AND MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are described and represented by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational (IN BALANCE). Objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS the SPEED OF LIGHT is RELATIVELY CONSTANT AS WELL. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. In fact, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. So, THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are not "falling" in what is "curved SPACE" in RELATION to what is THE SUN. This is nonsense. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. This truly explains PERPETUAL MOTION. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. By Frank DiMeglio EINSTEIN NEVER UNDERSTOOD PHILOSOPHY, MATHEMATICS, AND PHYSICS, AS HE HAS BEEN TOTALLY OUTSMARTED BY SIR FRANK MARTIN DIMEGLIO: The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is ESSENTIAL. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE. Dream experience is/involves true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. MOST IMPORTANTLY, in dreams, BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE. IMPORTANTLY, dream experience is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. THE EYE is ALSO the body. Dreams improve upon memory AND UNDERSTANDING. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the GENIUS of dreams. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/with what is THE EARTH. NOW, get a good LOOK at what is the translucent, SEMI-SPHERICAL, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE sky. Excellent. The DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. THE EARTH IS also BLUE (as water). F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that, why, and how ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, and describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, it is NECESSARILY a matter of precisely how these equations are understood in a BALANCED, EXTENSIVE, AND INTEGRATED fashion in RELATION to/with WHAT IS THOUGHT. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Get a good LOOK at what is THE EYE. POINTS are points. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. OPEN your EYES. NOW, LOOK at what is the FLAT, SETTING, AND ORANGE SUN (with the SPACE around it THEN going invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE). This ORANGE SUN manifests or forms at what is EYE LEVEL/BODY HEIGHT as well. This ORANGE SUN is manifest ON BALANCE as what is NECESSARILY the BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE of THE EARTH/LAVA. The viscosity of LAVA IS BETWEEN what is manifest as WATER AND THE EARTH/GROUND. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. F=ma AND E=mc2 do provide absolute, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, and CLEAR proof that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THEREFORE, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent with/as what is F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are NOT "falling" in what is "curved SPACE". In fact, this is nonsense. It is PROVEN. By Frank DiMeglio

[@MARKCREEKWATER1]

HIS BOOK "THE FIRST THREE MINUTES" IS GOOD ... SHORT-ENOUGH TO READ IN 1 OR 2 SITTINGS, AND CLEAR + SIMPLE ENOUGH FOR A NON-SCIENTIST TO UNDERSTAND ... YET THERE'S ENOUGH IN IT TO HOLD THE INTEREST OF A PARTICLE-PHYSICIST AND/OR AN ASTRO-PHYSICIST AND/OR A COSMOLOGIST AND/OR ASTRONOMER

[@Trp44]

Great thinker ...Communicator...

[@JeraldMYates]

Thankyou Mr. Steve Weinberg ! A good follow up, in my opinion, to these subjects .... on the web, FRACTALFIELD .........on KZbin, DAN WINTER.

[@uploadJ]

Audio Engineer: WATCH your VU meter and make SURE you are putting down sufficient AUDIO so we all don't have to crank our VOLUME sliders ALL THE WAY UP!!!

[@MeanFaces23]

All praise be to SCIENCE!

[@cosminvisan520]

For consciousness, see my papers, like "Meaning and Context: A Brief Introduction".

[@DrDeuteron]

the problem is, we used to unify by theorizing and experimenting with reality...and then came the revolution a la Newton. Now, we're demanding unification and working backwards. Good Luck.

[@schmetterling4477]

In other words... you didn't pay attention in science class. ;-)

[@brunodoussau_from_tyumen]

Je suis fan de ce mec

[@GuillermoPussetto]

Father of the Standard Model, a mind to listen and respect. He said "We have been looking at this problems for a long time and haven't made progress. Some theorist have tried entirely new approaches called String theory (new physics, the extension of the Standard Model) made the best effort that can be done but they aren't getting anywhere. They are not producing any predictions that can be compared with observations. They haven't come up with one theory that shows the 4 forces are unified."

[@JeraldMYates]

Optics ?

[@kennethchow213]

Unification of Weak interaction with electromagnetism was deemed to have been accomplished in about 1970 by A. Salem, S.Weinberg and S. Glashow. In the 1980's it was projected that at Planck energy of 10^19 joules, the Strong, Weak and electromagnetic forces will merge in magnitude. As for gravity: Mass(in kilograms)= Charge squared(in Coulombs squared)x10^minus 7 divided by distance between two charges in meters. Thus all 4 interactions are in fact identical.

[@23plumber]

***Dr. A. Salam

[@schmetterling4477]

Yes, that looks good on a blackboard and doesn't work in reality. ;-)

[@janmejaysingh7402]

Great lecture,although kind of lost him for a short time around the 20th minute mark

[@DrDeuteron]

read about isospin, and compare to spin, e.g., in math terms, the neutron and proton are the same particle, they just point in different directions in "isospin" space, which isn't a physical space...but the math is identical to a spin-1/2 particle in real space.

[@MeanFaces23]

Science be PRAISED.

[@vdoubledot]

"The only movies I've ever made are of close relations." I don't get it. Could someone please explain.

[@TheHartleydog]

Family videos.

[@keepcalmycarryon]

Agreed, his Science is impeccable. As for you, "Александр Лебедев," what say you for a midnight liaison over a steaming cup of "Cornish Cream Tea," if my drift is to be caught? Good Day.

[@maxcohengeniuus]

Weinberg good scientist

[@GuillermoPussetto]

Another thing that he is saying is that we need more energy but unfortunately the energy levels are huge, see a comparison : About the mass of the proton = 1 GeV = a billion electron volts. Upgraded LHC = 14 x 10^3 GeV (7 before upgrade, 14 in 2015) Planck scale = 10^18 GeV

[@maujo2009]

Why is this comment section out-dated?

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio has unified physics.

[@DrDeuteron]

Someone is jealous of the name of the higgs. He's right though, Higgs isn't 1/2 the physicist Weinberg was (but who is?)...But there is a Weinberg angle. (And a Cabibbo angle ...the 1st hint of mixing in the weak interaction (it mixes everything)....and Cabibbo got SHAFTED by the Nobel Prize, big time. See: Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa Matrix)).

[@schmetterling4477]

Dude, physicists don't do physics so they can get a Nobel one day. You need to grow up.

[@schmetterling4477]

@@DrDeuteron Then the people with the massive egos need to grow up, too. :-)

[@rodneykawecki1770]

Your right - physics is close to finish - thinking about the length of it - it seems we can't observe something you can't see. Darkness seems to allow us to see darkness but darkness doesn't allow us to see light or does it?

[@uploadJ]

Either: You know you are sh!t, or You know your sh!t. Which is complementary?

[@uploadJ]

re: "physics is close to finish " Then take a look at GUTCP, written by Dr. Mills with a basis in the work by Prof. Herman Haus.

[@starfox1]

"the only movies i've ever made are of close relations" LOL does that mean what I think it means? Hilarious, I love it !

[@anthonyedwards1936]

Yes but the math is fun.

[@GuillermoPussetto]

No errors in Maxwell equations needed, anti-gravity is legitimated in General Theory of relativity,

[@zissou6928]

Apparently there are errors in Maxwell's equations that make antigravity possible

[@uploadJ]

Cite the err?

[@uploadJ]

11 mos later and NO CITE.

[@AjitisnotamanHeislongdeadBir]

Question s. 1.what creates Motion ? 2. Is motion neither born or dead ?.3.what is light ? A thing in itself or is the property of some other object? 4.why does it travel or speed ? Does it need to travel? 6. What is Sun? A property of some other object or it is a thing in itself? 7. Where from does it get the energy ? What is the secret ?.8 is there black lights? What is Blackhole? 9. Is Blackhole anty to light and Sun ? Or Sun and Blackhole's complement each other? What is Gravity ? What is anty Gravity? How many types of Gravities are there ?. What creates Gravity ? Is it self contained object.? What creates Magnetism? Electricity? Energy ? Matter? .what are anty Magnetism, anty Electricity anti matter ? 9.Who creates ice water and Oceans ? 10. What creates life plants animals And Men ? 11. What constitute Space? Is it growing or is it dying ? 12. Is space a thing in itself ? 13. Why Time is linked to Space ? Is Space a dead matter or a live matter ? 14.what is universe ? Why is it linked to Space? What is negative Space ? 15. Is there a Scientific language to describe the above problems?. Are these problems of Physics ? AjitBir Author Scientist Philosopher Artist Play wright lives in Bhubaneswar India.

[@uploadJ]

You do not grasp the simplicity of some of the elements you question; until resolved, wander in the desert, searching for the wrong meaning.

[@schmetterling4477]

Or... you could have paid attention in high school. ;-)

[@casacara]

Saying that the ISS has produced nothing of scientific interest is a profoundly ignorant statement for someone so well educated. It's also confusing that he would criticize spending on space, when the budget of (at least in the US) the space program is less than half a percent of the discretionary budget. It would make far more sense to criticize a truly wasteful expenditure, like the bloated budget of the U.S. defense department. Instead, he tries to tear down other people who struggle for funding as hard as he does. It's very disappointing to hear something like that from someone so clearly brilliant.

[@schmetterling4477]

This didn't age well. Ukraine shows you why you need to carry a big stick.

[@GuillermoPussetto]

In my opinion, the fact that we cannot get the necessary data to study unification (because the energy levels are beyond what we can generate at this time) it is never ever an excuse to avoid falsifiability, as String Theory in doing. Science without falsifiability is worst than religion and I rather prefer to believe in Greek mythology than in not falsifiable science.

[@AjitisnotamanHeislongdeadBir]

Philosophically Motion is a root unifying object. But is.Motion a thing in itself or depends on some other object? Motion depends on Ky Current and Ky Current means Space has to be a Biophysical object or Mother Fluid. If this is accepted this Ky Current is the universe of Physics. Ky Current creates a wide variety of things through Ax and Dx Currents. To find this super Current creating Sun Blackholes PoleStar and Electricity. Milkways and things beyond We need Some Satellites to trace this Super Current controlling Gravity Magnetism

[@apburner1]

Steve Weinberg May 3, 1933-Jun 15, 2015 RIP

[@Kolinahr1701]

apburner1 Still alive.

[@vadinhopsc]

YUP! 83.

[@MARKCREEKWATER1]

FORGET ABOUT "ANTI-GRAVITY" !! U PROB'LY DON'T KNOW ENUFF PHYSICS TO UNDERSTAND IT, EVEN IF IT EXISTs !! LEARN MORE OF THE BASICs !!