Engel v. Vitale, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Cases]

[@Zeenault]

Please keep making these videos they are the reason I'm able to do well in my classes

[@abrambooth5588]

He's still at it. Thanks for your help wise one

[@xeo8471]

i love you once again, my teacher doesn't have this style of teaching so these videos really help me understand the concept. thank you!!

[@jlawrence0181]

Interesting videos. I really like the fact that you discuss the dissents to the majority opinion. Often, they are cited in later cases, especially when the decision is overturned.

[@actanonverba3041]

Small error: the Due Process Clause incorporated the Bill of Rights freedoms against the states, not the Privileges and Immunities Clause (which makes no sense, but neither does SCOTUS half the time).

[@user-otsun]

thank you so much for this video and the review packet! you are so incredible for sharing this!

[@kaia_tp]

thank you so much these help me so much!

[@nathanhightower595]

thanks for the vids u do be a life saver bruh

[@kooroshheidari5975]

First thank you so much for these videos

[@heimlershistory]

You’re most welcome!

[@Joe-INFP-Mediator]

Am I the only one that notices the “Why It Matters” transition slide plays twice?

[@elliotlikescoasters]

you are a lifesaver 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@Galaxy-jk3xh]

This helped me understand Defeating Darwinism thanks

[@bb3ll07]

I’m here because my friend said BUSH TOOK PRAYER OUT OF SCHOOL 😂😂 I guess he hasn’t heard of this case😆

[@chamomiletea758]

Thank you!

[@salenamae80]

Question What would happen if the children didn't have permission to not read the prayer? Would they go to juvie or have to pay a fine because it was the law?

[@brettdobson3122]

What about Hylton v. United States? Did Marbury v. Madison really "invest" the power of judicial review? Or did Hylton do that?

[@sana7105]

Marbury V Madison was the key start of judicial review...

[@faizandewan9520]

I mean...Marbury v. Madison was the first case ever where judicial review was used and established because of the judiciary act of 1789 being null and voided by the SC.

[@JamesFrew-j1s]

kai asks is this an old video?

[@user-jb7pe7wf1z]

new york made students do a non denominatal prayer - violated establishment clause: congress can not establish a religion (but New York is a state) - 14th amendment says states need to give citizens bill of rights - yes, it violated the first amendment - separation between church and state why it matters - individual liberty > social order

[@RichardSorel-r1c]

He Drinks Tim Horton's before each video.

[@jlawrence0181]

Why were there only seven votes??

[@alexdiflorio5141]

I was wondering how a 6:1 decision is made. Weren't there 9 justices?

[@spektree8448]

i think 2 just didnt participate or sumn

[@DrPrism.]

@@spektree8448 yep you're right

[@swans444]

they can choose whether or not they want to participate

[@user-pt4kp7zb1v]

justice stewart is the one dislike

[@vaushbad2971]

I guess justice stewart has been sent straight to the shadow realm now

[@xStarz05]

@@vaushbad2971 lol

[@georgetwilight7732]

Sorry i was a little confused on why it was a 6-1 decision if there are 9 Justices

[@mr.m_photographs]

I believe 2 justices didn’t vote for other reasons. I saw the reasons somewhere I just don’t remember what they were. (I think one my have missed the oral arguments, and the other one may have been sick -I don’t know those are just guesses)

[@z72219]

all justices dont always vote

[@mattjohnstonz8858]

🐐

[@TazKidNoah]

Engel v. Vitale outcome was given & correct but latter cases arent the same; that's the problem;their is intent to not recognize differences between cases. THere is soo much ignorance within the political spectrum in US, outcomes are just going to be contradictory as time passes

[@localoca3009]

o lawd

[@sdfjsd]

0:32 Not everyone believes in God

[@RoadetallSnow-xo7xr]

Believe in Jesus and be save

[@josequillman7606]

I would really appreciate it if you would remove your bias from this specific court case concerning state sponsored religious prayer. When you speak about it, you provide sympathy to the state sponsored prayer by stating that the prayer is not a big deal in the grand scheme of things but in fact it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ILLEGAL, you are making it seem like it is okay when it fact it is NOT. I thought you provided BIAS FREE educational content but in fact you do not and insert your own political bias and ideas.

[@nightfall4434]

??? Sounds like a you problem cause I’m not finding bias anywhere

[@slendertrn1479]

Is not that political

[@josequillman7606]

@@nightfall4434 read my comment

[@brianu451]

I'm religious but I don't see any bias, it's not that deep..

[@That_CatGir1.]

Where is the bias? He talks about the case and how it was unconstitutional