The good ending was...added. The original just has the abused citizens of animal farm looking over their new overlords remarking their resemblance to the old farmer in a way that "they couldn't tell the difference". The book ends there.
@bigboomer10134 жыл бұрын
The live action movie ends the same way.
@snowy27474 жыл бұрын
I preferred the book ending. It tells us that if you give into power and don’t fight back sooner, it could be too late. Just because someone is higher above you doesn’t make them right.
@rabbit81534 жыл бұрын
I kinda see the movie ending as an infinite cycle which makes it more sad than the book I might see it wrong but that how I imagine
@unsuspiciousdweller89674 жыл бұрын
Been years since I last saw the live action movie, but I could have sworn it ended with Napoleon dying of old age, and the other animals able to be free only then.
@pepticgloopys10134 жыл бұрын
i personally think that's the most important line of the book
@NotVeryRandomDude5 жыл бұрын
1945 - Manga 1954 - Anime 1999 - Netflix adaptation
@ooppetal21835 жыл бұрын
that's almost exactly how Watership Down went :0
@shoozebelstar66645 жыл бұрын
Also 1954 - Suitmation.
@myblueyoshi29675 жыл бұрын
2021-Sony animation pictures
@Chuked5 жыл бұрын
ThatRandomDude oh then I read the manga first👍
@oreo37404 жыл бұрын
Correction: 1977: Netflix adaptation
@thenecroticraptor83385 жыл бұрын
You know it's bad when the *_raven_* looks away.
@penguinw74 жыл бұрын
his name is Moses
@a.k81854 жыл бұрын
Actually .........*you are right*
@mediatorraptor33494 жыл бұрын
It just witness some of his bird relative get torn into pieces. Of course it would look away.
@CAPTAPHOENIXF904 жыл бұрын
Yup, that one of the clue context that my teacher taught me that horrific death of these animals
@shuliu48044 жыл бұрын
Poor berd.
@madness_mania2 жыл бұрын
13:50 the pig really said 😭😭😒😭😭 LIKE THAT WAS MY FAVORITE THING EVER
@Antonio-fj5gs2 жыл бұрын
The beginning of that fake mourning moment Squealer: 😭I was with him right to the end 👀
@beastmaster09343 ай бұрын
That’s Squealer, he’s pretty much Napoleon’s yes man and second in command.
@catherinecao4810Ай бұрын
It actually happened in the book.
@ploppman75245 жыл бұрын
Based on a book by George Orwell? Oh I'm sure it's all sunshine and rainbows from the same author as 1984.
@thomaspatton9265 жыл бұрын
Yeah anytime you are talking about communism it’s gonna be sunshine and rainbows
@thek2despot4265 жыл бұрын
@mary sunshine Things that look beautiful but are really just destructive and/or lies? I think maybe the "sunshine and rainbows" saying works even better thinking of it like *that* in the contexts it is often used; for example, in this case communism.
@Outlaw72635 жыл бұрын
Archer: Wait, there are animals? Lana: No, Animal Farm. Cyril: How do you not get that? Archer: No, I know what an animal farm is. Cyril: Not an animal farm. Archer: Maybe we can stampede a flock of goats down the hall. Lana: ANIMAL FARM IS A BOOK! Archer: No, it’s not Lana. It’s an allegorical novella about Stalinism by George Orwell, and spoiler alert, IT SUCKS!
@jessemcelroy27765 жыл бұрын
Censorship can be dangerous too.
@ballislife60345 жыл бұрын
Outlaw7263 bro, you just posted *C R I N G E*
@pacoramon94686 жыл бұрын
The donkey gets thinner and thinner after Napoleon takes over, nice detail.
@shibainu90436 жыл бұрын
detail
@josephmiranda70476 жыл бұрын
welcome to the ricefields *detail*
@malachi96956 жыл бұрын
Benjamin is the donkey
@hiyallimamythepizzaman99005 жыл бұрын
de *tail*
@wulfulk10005 жыл бұрын
DEEPEST LORE
@kloverleavezisdeadlol5 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: Animal Farm is actually the first British animated film. *looks like the began on a dark note*
@savageshot37235 жыл бұрын
"The began" lmfao
@nyctea-52185 жыл бұрын
SpoopyMemeyBook *cough* Watership down *cough*
@DenpaKei5 жыл бұрын
@@nyctea-5218 that came out later
@blizzardthekleptomaniac1005 жыл бұрын
-cough cough- animals of farthing woods
@jasburger5 жыл бұрын
Hey Flower
@sadlittleghost83462 жыл бұрын
The ending of the book is extremely haunting. After seeing the pigs walking on two legs and wearing clothes, the other animals go back to check the rules because they were sure that wasn’t allowed. There they find “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others” which is the last line of the book.
@willphoenix5464 Жыл бұрын
Don't forget the very last sentence "They looked at a pig, then at a man, and then at a pig, and they couldn't tell which was which"
@boi-op9lc Жыл бұрын
@@willphoenix5464 what a way to end a book it left me with so many emotions
@thenosebud Жыл бұрын
That’s not the last line of the book
@TheFawfulExpressMustardO-cx6mw Жыл бұрын
"They looked from pig to man, then man to pig, then pig to man again, but already it was impossible to tell which was which.
@TheFawfulExpressMustardO-cx6mw Жыл бұрын
Want to know the bets thing about the "some more equal than others" line. It's Benjamin, the donkey who has stayed apathetic and cryptic throughout the whole book, that reads it. Things have gotten so bad that even he can't ignore them anymore.
@dshe86375 жыл бұрын
This isn't a kid's film. The book (which is FAR more widely known and recognised than the films btw) is a political allegory of the Soviet system. George Orwell was always highly political in his writing; this isn't a children's story. Each of the characters represents an historical figure directly.
@trevor42125 жыл бұрын
He never said it was a kids movie. He said he watched it as a kid.
@zsuzsannamezey83615 жыл бұрын
@@trevor4212 the thumbnail literally says "DISTURBING KIDS FILM!" in bold yellow letters.
@Hydrolaevea5 жыл бұрын
woooosh
@Patrick618045 жыл бұрын
D She they make all freshman read it in my school
@hellonokay19255 жыл бұрын
He knew that this was not a kids film he put a ' this on the word kids
@maxtheoutkast694 жыл бұрын
As soon as the hogfather pig died of a heart attack, I got an ad of someone flipping burgers and I lost my mind. I couldn't stop laughing.
@catandrobbyflores3 жыл бұрын
I got lip gloss
@RaraZeCat3 жыл бұрын
I’m just waiting for an ad for pig skin boots, or candy that contians geletan.
@TheUnheardVoices_3 жыл бұрын
😂
@TheBatIsRad64353 жыл бұрын
If only it was bacon. That wounded been perfect
@KFrost-fx7dt3 жыл бұрын
Are people still not using adblock these days?
@troglodyte42076 жыл бұрын
Not sure why’d you expect anything less from an adaptation of a George Orwell book
@BasicallyGoblin6 жыл бұрын
Who was an anti authoritarian Brit, but he seemed to skim right the fuck over that shit
@hollingharris6596 жыл бұрын
thank you for saying the exact thing i was thinking but too lazy to comment myself
@datman24336 жыл бұрын
I can't wait to see "My 1984 summer"
@BigBossMan538 Жыл бұрын
Maybe I'm misremembering, but Snowball always seemed like he actually had good intentions for the farm and the animals. His mistake was not realizing what Napoleon was up to and how easily exploitable their system was
@TheCam9209 ай бұрын
Yep, if you remember, things were much more prosperous and happy under the democratic system where all animals could vote. It was after Napoleon's betrayal of animalism where life got much harder for the animals
@dylanpoynor23189 ай бұрын
I just finished the book and that is true. When George Orwell wrote Snowball he based him off of Leon Trotsky, who he greatly admired.
@Octopugilist6 ай бұрын
Snowball truly wanted to help everyone, and while the farm he was building wouldn't have been perfect, he would never have screwed everyone over like Napoleon did
@JakiKang5 ай бұрын
My interpretation of snowball atleast after reading the book was that while he may have seemed to have good intentions, he wasnt nessicarly any better than Napoleon. They were still both pigs and chances are if snowball would have stayed he would have become just as corrupt as Napoleon. Just my interpretation though
@gaudium-wille94705 ай бұрын
Wasn't snowball in with the pigs when they drank the milk from cows and got the apples, or wa sit just Napoleon and the otehr pigs? I'm asking about the book because in this movie it's Napolen and Squealer who drink from the milk
@AKIPOPOPOPOOON5 жыл бұрын
*ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS*
@karateparty1005 жыл бұрын
(Sheep chanting) FOUR LEGS GOOD! TWO LEGS BAD! FOUR LEGS GOOD! TWO LEGS BAD!
@lynetteglenn81545 жыл бұрын
I'm confused too. :)
@columbidae205 жыл бұрын
All chips are equal but some are more equal than others
@ronald.jchanefeild52795 жыл бұрын
3 words Load of bull
@krakenking87635 жыл бұрын
Yyyyessssss???
@FiveOClockTea5 жыл бұрын
Funnily enough in France it's illegal to name your pig Napoleon 🐷
@christinao90615 жыл бұрын
iirc in the French translation of Animal Farm they call the character Cesar
@hypnoticskull63424 жыл бұрын
I wonder why! XD
@housel93524 жыл бұрын
They dont want to taint Napoleon's name with a communist swine
@girlhelp83644 жыл бұрын
But is it illegal to name any other animal the name?
@thaleswust4 жыл бұрын
@Le Crapaud Biscornu Allah and Muhammad are religious figures that are very respected by many. Napoleon may also be a respected figure, but when you disrespect a political figure it's a disrespect solely of that figure, but when you talk about a deity, you're talking about a whole culture. And Allah's and Muhammad's culture is not a very tolerant one when people mess with their figures, Remember the Charlie Hebdo incident? And even South Park tried to mess with this subject and had to censor an episode. It's not a crime to name your pet Allah, but may not be a good idea
@chronovac5 жыл бұрын
It's almost like it's based on an Orwell novel
@melodysafo54375 жыл бұрын
It is
@mastemathedank40435 жыл бұрын
@@melodysafo5437 r/woosh
@Jaynosurname5 жыл бұрын
I WoNdEr WhY
@MMoutoo5 жыл бұрын
@@melodysafo5437 r/woooooooooooosh
@elisabethnelson54525 жыл бұрын
@@melodysafo5437 r/woooooooooosh
@bellarawding64703 жыл бұрын
The ending- In the book, the ending is literally that pretty much everyone is dead, now theres only really Benjamin, Clover (Another Horse), and a few others. Napoleon randomly goes dictator mode, along with another pig, Squealer (Squealer is Napoleons little, lets say, controller I guess. In the book, he is EXTREMALLY persuasive and is constantly convincing the animals that everything is a-okay.) Everyone is now miserable. They all understand whats going on, yet they have so little power, they have to just deal with it by now. The pigs break that whole moral conduct, and now Napoleon is drinking with other farmers, playing cards, showing his full dictator side by now and it's shown that the animals really are overworked, despite Squealer constantly saying they're doing way better than in Jones day. The book ends with the animals unable to tell whos who, human to pig, and an arguement breaking out about cards. The ending is sad. The ending is cruel and not happy at all. That's the point; the ending should not be happy out of a book based off of Dictators, Communism, and Oppression. The book was never supposed to have a happy ending as having one pretty much destroys the point of the plot; dictators are powerful and will silence you and force you into your place. Just my view on the book!
@milk-ub9zo2 жыл бұрын
The point of the end of the book is that even the very ones who had sworn to never because like their enemies (humans) became just like them in front of the irresistible thirst for power.
@@TheBeachBoysOfficial what even are you talking about this book was released in 1945 it's about the russian revolution and afterwards
@Da.Liar-Pig2 жыл бұрын
I just remembered that I watch the documentary about the production of this animated adaptation It was said that John Halas did not want to change the ending but it was said to do so
@koyomin2412 жыл бұрын
"they looked from man And pig, than pig to man. But saw no difference"
@kaywilliams75405 жыл бұрын
Steve: The animals begin to build Snowball's- Napoleon: *UNGODLY SCREAM* Steve: I mean, Napoleon's windmill Me: (○-○)
@wanderingaceminecraftandmo80345 жыл бұрын
I swear I laughed at the scream.
@kaywilliams75405 жыл бұрын
@@wanderingaceminecraftandmo8034 I think I laughed too because it was so unexpected
@wanderingaceminecraftandmo80345 жыл бұрын
@@kaywilliams7540 agreed.
@asriellian5 жыл бұрын
Literal REEEEEEEEEÉEEEEEEEEE
@BrenTenkage5 жыл бұрын
@@asriellian exactly, now whenever I see the word reeeeee I will now think of that
@roborabbit1595 жыл бұрын
Actually the creepy song is really them trying to sing " Beasts of England "
@autistichades55525 жыл бұрын
Mades sense, The Russian Empire were allies with Britain(and France) until the blood covered their flag.
@mineboom73775 жыл бұрын
It even said that in the book.
@ayhemsellami99125 жыл бұрын
Does anyone have the lyrics
@labellelace5 жыл бұрын
Extra Funny Meme it’s in the book. You can probably find them online.
@rhiannonderen17575 жыл бұрын
Duh..
@robertlopez20525 жыл бұрын
Snowball was such a good guy. I genuinely loved him. He was so kind, and he genuinely wanted to help out the animals.
@elainefillname98565 жыл бұрын
can you say the same for Trotsky?
@The-kr9rb5 жыл бұрын
I mean, more or less he was. Trotsky himself is a bit more complicated, because he isn't a pig.
@noneofyourbeeswax015 жыл бұрын
@@elainefillname9856 Wasn't he supposed to be Lenin?
@noneofyourbeeswax015 жыл бұрын
@@The-kr9rb : _" Trotsky himself is a bit more complicated, because _*_he isn't a pig_*_ "_ Dude... Spoilers!
@The-kr9rb5 жыл бұрын
@@noneofyourbeeswax01 lol
@kilssj22502 жыл бұрын
It's because they killed off the female dog. I don't remember her name, but she was the mother of the puppies that were taken and turned into soldiers. I feel like she played an integral role in the readers understanding throughout the book 📖.
@serenitythesiren50312 жыл бұрын
In the book, she was sort of divided into two dogs, one named Jessie, one named Bluebell. The saddest part is, neither of them die. Napoleon just takes the puppies to 'educate' them.
@featherybastard7 ай бұрын
in the book she isn't all that important but her role is bumped up significantly in the 1999 film
@beastmaster09343 ай бұрын
@@serenitythesiren5031 That’s what happened in the 1999 live action version. Although in that one, Jessie was the only dog named.
@Nukawin5 жыл бұрын
The moment where the slaughter truck took Boxer away always left me in tears, he was my favourite character throughout the movie. :(
@ferrugemalemao5 жыл бұрын
That's when I stopped watching it as a kid. Never watched it again. The trauma was somehow "cured" when we read the book in English class when I was older.
@1945joshuaruiz5 жыл бұрын
That how it was tho If you stopped working the state doesn’t see you as useful anymore . You no longer have purpose . Either you and your family die from starvation or simply “disappear “
@onyxsavior71795 жыл бұрын
Napoleon the pig can go fuck himself
@Freefork5 жыл бұрын
Boxer is the best animal in media, HANDS/HOOFS DOWN!
@jeffjeff14455 жыл бұрын
I've just finished reading the book for school it's really good
@__________58025 жыл бұрын
It is not your farm... IT IS *OUR* FARM
@kartblaster99875 жыл бұрын
bro what is that PFP?
@deeznuts-kw6yv5 жыл бұрын
*communism intensify’s*
@michaelboydston3135 жыл бұрын
In the middle of our street
@thatoneguywiththevoice3285 жыл бұрын
USSR national anthem intensifies
@thatoneguywiththevoice3285 жыл бұрын
2:14
@alastair8765 жыл бұрын
I remember reading this my freshman year of highschool- Even younger dumbass me knew how much this book screamed "COMMUNISM"
@natalijatheghost5 жыл бұрын
I loved this book as a freshman, and I still like it
@alastair8765 жыл бұрын
@@natalijatheghost same here tbh
@communisttrash85905 жыл бұрын
The best part is this is written by a socialist and is a critique on soviet communism but Orwell actually fought with communists and believed in communism he wrote a book on it called homage to Catalonia you should read it
@alastair8765 жыл бұрын
@@communisttrash8590 huh, that is quite interesting tbh. It's interesting to know that the book was a critique of a certain method of it.
@kevinnigins94885 жыл бұрын
Alastair • Freshman? I was forced to read this book in 8th grade
@ghostslayer19812 жыл бұрын
I always thought it was creepy how napoleon in the book was always able to keep the rest of the farm from overthrowing him and going back to snowball after he's kicked out. He keeps using him as a scapegoat for multiple misdeeds (which never happened) and slowly over the book change who snowball was from a true animal hero who attacked Jones and lead the animal charge to being a traitor to Jones and helping the humans fight, leading the human charge. It's creepy because he does it so well by slowly blurring that line with the animals forgetting all the specifics of the tale and eventually getting it warped due to that. And if anyone questioned it, like say Boxer? Death, as we see. Napoleon knows that to keep control, he needs to build trust and upkeep all his lies. And in the book and movie, he really does that well.
@meh8982 Жыл бұрын
Orwell does a similar thing in 1984 with "Goldstein" as the all-purpose scapegoat. I think in Animal Farm the Snowball role was inspired by Trotsky. It's typical of authoritarian regimes. You often see the same thing today.
@yeethittter12855 жыл бұрын
I actually very recently finished reading the original book. It's actually surprising how different it is. For example, the cat doesn't actually die I'm pretty sure, and the book actually ends on the much lower note of the farm having gone through a loop and the pigs being exactly like farmer Jones. By the way, the "creepy song" at the beginning is a very important song from the book called 'Beasts of England', they just used animal noises instead of english lyrics. The animals did speak.
@blod98625 жыл бұрын
The dog (mother of the puppies, tho technically there was two dogs who where mothers of the puppies) didn’t die in the battle, she died of old age in the last chapter
@isamovies11926 жыл бұрын
The book was way darker and more depressing
@froggyslap6 жыл бұрын
Isa Movies of course, books usually have more detail and events that don’t get into the movies
@copperbunnies98496 жыл бұрын
@@froggyslap yes yes I agree; I do prefer books over the film adaptation
@raviothethief82926 жыл бұрын
Isa Movies yup read it in 5th grade and my fucking God..
@noahbutler91806 жыл бұрын
It is a really good book though
@noahbutler91806 жыл бұрын
@@raviothethief8292 you read animal farm in 5th grade
@LemonMelonShork6 жыл бұрын
"Oh GOD! Make it stop!" *Old Major dies* "Thank you."
@melodicmelody67306 жыл бұрын
lmaoo
@itsmoe00436 жыл бұрын
We had to watch the film for class, and we may have laughed hysterically when Old Major died....
@Metalsluga_ Жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Snowball didn't get killed, he just got chased off and when the windmill got blown down (not by dynamite, they left out the bit out in the film) they blame it on snowball
@basilcat3111 Жыл бұрын
In the animated version, he died.
@Metalsluga_ Жыл бұрын
@@basilcat3111 oh yeah, I meant in the book, I forgot to include that
@crimsondynamo6153 ай бұрын
I heard Napoleon sent a weasel to drive a pickaxe through the back of snowball’s head
@TehBluPanda5 жыл бұрын
I love how my high school decided it was a good idea to have us read Animal Farm without any sort of grasp on important concepts like... communism... and politics...
@Artizap_5 жыл бұрын
My 6th grade Middle School class thought it was a good idea as well...
@Chidera4205 жыл бұрын
I also like how i have to waste my summer over this and fahrenheit 451
@dogecollection45195 жыл бұрын
The idea was that if you learn that absolute control and suppression of the people is bad as a child, you’re smart enough as you get older to understand why communism and fascism are bad. It sets a precedent
@hissanrach87975 жыл бұрын
@@dogecollection4519 Except it's an example of blatant dishonesty and ideological brainwashing in the education sector. Children are told to read stories which are literal propaganda before they have any understanding of what is even being portrayed specifically so it skews and warps their view of history, so they are conditioned to uncritically oppose something they don't understand, ie controlling what they think.
@SeruraRenge115 жыл бұрын
I'm curious, what was their take on the book without understand the subtext?
@isaaccrawford51085 жыл бұрын
The book doesn't have a happy ending. It just ends all depressing with Napoleon as a horrible dictator. It's so depressing when it ends. Edit: I cant believe so many of you like this comment. You're welcome.
@Snowfang005 жыл бұрын
But the ending of the book brings up the main idea behind the story. In the book, Napoleon and the other pigs are sitting with a group of humans. When the animals looked through the glass at them, they couldn't tell the difference between the two groups. Meaning that Napoleon had completely gone against what Old Major had told them years ago.
@yeethittter12855 жыл бұрын
@@Snowfang00 and Napoleon convinces all animals throughout the book that they are equal, but it ends in a sort of loop when he ends up exactly like farmer joe
@CheshireCesare5 жыл бұрын
@@Snowfang00 Man, when the animals started walking upright in the book and essentially becoming "human"... even just reading that freeeaakeddd me out, it was somewhat expected and yet... *not* ...
@fatmanbatman93745 жыл бұрын
Thats how 1984 ended orwell had bad endings
@Rassilons-hand-me-downs5 жыл бұрын
That’s why I love the book tbh
@santiagoboscan32775 жыл бұрын
I didn’t know that Soviet Union got an anime adaptation
@frenchsoldier84855 жыл бұрын
Animation*
@Artizap_5 жыл бұрын
French Soldier *Anime
@frenchsoldier84855 жыл бұрын
@@Artizap_ Animation
@Artizap_5 жыл бұрын
French Soldier *Anime
@Craze_12095 жыл бұрын
War in a nutshell: above my reply
@The-Macdoo Жыл бұрын
They actually explain the whole "wings count as legs" a lot better in the book.
@c.d.dailey80134 ай бұрын
Yeah. Wings are like legs in that they are both used purely for locomotion. By contrast, a human's arms are used for using tools.
@FayeLawnKrack3d3 ай бұрын
Yeah, they’re basically evolved legs.
@ThatOneMan8306 жыл бұрын
>Animal Farm >Kid’s film Pick one, you can’t have both.
@Bananappleboy6 жыл бұрын
alex bajayo both
@Swock0106 жыл бұрын
@@Bananappleboy dam gottem 👌🏼😂👏🏼👍🏼
@mrheroprimes6 жыл бұрын
i remeber this movie Scared the ever Living Daylights out of me as a kid, I think it's from one of those 5 dollar DVDs that were sold a alongside compilation dvds of old 1930/40's Warner Brothers cartoons and superman cartoons, also including two very badly dubbed South Korean anime films Diatron-5 and Defenders of space (it's main robot that appear in this film is basically Inferno from Transformers Generation 1),walmart in the early 2000's.
@cinnanovelist6 жыл бұрын
alex bajayo Animal Farm Always
@bubblenugget12156 жыл бұрын
How about neither
@insanemariobros46653 жыл бұрын
We read this book in my freshman year and, I’m not gonna lie, I actually enjoyed it. Yes it’s dark, but George Orwell had a thing for historical satire, and I found that compelling myself!
@vortigan90683 жыл бұрын
ikr dark stuff is pretty interesting
@joeytofil22593 жыл бұрын
You might enjoy Chuck Palahniuk, he wrote Fight Club and his genre is twisted satire
@gabrielcastillo76383 жыл бұрын
I read the book in my freshman year and it's great
@lukedanuser2 жыл бұрын
Read it yesterday and it was fascinating, couldn’t put it down.
@snakezlair66712 жыл бұрын
Same with me
@saturnalia33356 жыл бұрын
See but here’s the gag: they didn’t actually revolt in the original book so it was even more depressing
@benchmarking68756 жыл бұрын
That is because the book was made in 1945
@barrettfenwick80286 жыл бұрын
They couldn't show the Totalitarian Commie winning in the middle of the Cold War. The CIA actually had a decent amount of input on this film!
@monkofdarktimes6 жыл бұрын
Its the last 5 minutes of the first flim that the CIA affected
@Redbird-dh7mu5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the point of the book is to not give away your freedoms because you might not get them back.
@Nyerguds5 жыл бұрын
Would be funnier if they were taken over by the cows and the whole cycle just started again :p
@boop74052 жыл бұрын
the boxer plotline disturbed me so much in both the book and movie but imo its worse in the movie cause you see it all happen and seeing boxer scream and cry while he’s getting pulled away to the glue factory. Absolutely traumatized me
@JeanMurray-wc2mr9 ай бұрын
Same, I watched this when I was a kid and I never forgot about it..years later as an adult reading the book it had the same effect on me.
@jwebcoding72897 ай бұрын
The most cynical part about it was that they used the money from selling him to the knacker to buy a whole case of booze so the pigs could get drunk.
@Whocares1584 ай бұрын
Treated him like a piece of 🍖 ready to be Sold.
@Iceclaw776 жыл бұрын
I would say that while Animal Farm isn't supposed to be a children's book, I can understand why people would (at first glance) think that it is. The language and prose used in it (for the most part) is simple to understand, the plot is easy to follow, the book's length is short compared to most other novels, and even the title gives the impression that it is for a much younger audience. Tl;dr: Animal Farm is an allegory for the rise of the USSR disguised as a novel for adults disguised as a children's book.
@jerm706 жыл бұрын
Eh, its meant to be a kid's book, its just that the modern day standards of child's book is so skewed to where not even Peter Pan is a kid's book.
@honest_1266 жыл бұрын
@@jerm70 if it is, it's for children probably, PROBABLY, for kids in a middle school level on.
@jerm706 жыл бұрын
@@honest_126 Instead of is replace it with was. Past tense. Kids are baby'd nowadays.
@garfieif81876 жыл бұрын
It's for kids and adults alike. Kids deserve to read things with depth and meaning, too, and the value of thinking for yourself is one that isn't taught nearly enough.
@Da_Swifta6 жыл бұрын
Couldn't have said it better meself mate
@brandongonzalez_3 жыл бұрын
I noticed something. As we first see the pups that Napoleon adopts, they are white, innocent pups that have pure souls. But as we see the pups grown up, their skin turns black and dark, corrupted by Napoleon’s dark intent, and the dogs are left to work for Napoleon not knowing of the pure life they could have had.
@nidohime62333 жыл бұрын
They were basically brainwashed as personal assasins.
@Usher29903 жыл бұрын
@@nidohime6233 were*
@nidohime62333 жыл бұрын
@@Usher2990 My bad
@lordtabs3 жыл бұрын
):
@eleonorvoncarter67693 жыл бұрын
Of course
@etps44444 жыл бұрын
11:18 My initial thought was, "Where did they get the red paint?" and then, ".... Oh."
@andreac26984 жыл бұрын
Jesus christ
@gayfurry764 жыл бұрын
Thats hot
@samsung43604 жыл бұрын
Thanks😢 , i thought it was buyed 😥.
@iexistyes_4 жыл бұрын
Shit did you have to?
@sillysquee4 жыл бұрын
Nice luz pfp 👀
@uyq57263 жыл бұрын
I love how Steve forgets boxers name half way in and starts calling him buster.
@monikaradzaj74076 жыл бұрын
Animal Farm isn't aimed at kids though. It's aimed to a more adult audience.
@damiancampbell75346 жыл бұрын
Monika Radzaj That didnt stop me from reading the book in school when I was a kid.
@sem91656 жыл бұрын
it’s anti communism. which means it’s for everyone.
@MultiDiarmuid6 жыл бұрын
@@sem9165 It's Anti-Soviet, not anti-communist. There's a reason why Old Major and Snowball are portrayed sympathetically in the book.
@zladdykalash21256 жыл бұрын
I watched it in 5th grade, I disagree.
@nomem_dubium6 жыл бұрын
Well I saw it when I was 3 Not a good idea , really
@taliawtf69445 жыл бұрын
Always be extremely wary of people claiming they can make a utopia or perfect world or system. More often than not they mean it will be perfect for them and no one else.
@anon95795 жыл бұрын
Utopia can never be
@rickmarr44785 жыл бұрын
One's Utopia is Another's Dystopia.
@littlemoth49565 жыл бұрын
Humanity is too vast of a species to be able to work together long enough to form a utopia.
@LazyPirate85 жыл бұрын
Utopia stands for me myself and I. Not you!
@littlemoth49565 жыл бұрын
@@LazyPirate8 But each person can call themselves "me myself and I." There are over 7 billion people in the world, you know.
@JadeAnnabelArt3 жыл бұрын
“They looked from man and pig, than from pig to man, and saw no difference.” I recently read the book myself and have been obsessed with everything surrounding it. I found that last line to be open ended, which helped the message. It offered a choice, it offered free thought. To come to your own conclusions. The animated version felt like what was expected. Starving animals don’t put up much of a fight, but a hundred of them will certainly take you down. A hundred starving slaves can kill a small group of slaves. The live action movie is the worst by far. It focused way too much on a single animal (Jessie), who (spoilers) dies of old age in the book without much fanfare. In the book, the puppies are take in plain sight, Napolean giving a half assed excuse, but the animals forget swiftly. In the movie Jessie constantly begs with them to no avail. She’s the main star and she won’t let you forget it. The ending is “Well we left and the elements took care of the pigs.” Which just suggests inaction is the answer. Animal Farm doesn’t need a main character. It’s not about the individuals, which is why the live action really rubbed me the wrong way. It’s about all the animals as a whole. The whole country/community. Anyway the animated movie gave the book justice. It gave the ending we expected the book to have after that chilling last line, and a satisfaction required of a visual media.
@mattoreo58543 жыл бұрын
Nah imo the ending ruined it. Them winning defeated the point. It was supposed to be a cautionary tale, but because the CIA got involved with the movie, it became about overthrowing bad governments. The message of a cycle of revolutions and oppression was defeated by them seemingly defeating communism and bringing forth democracy. I think the book ended where it was supposed to. The story was meant to make you sad, felling hopeless, not overjoyed that democracy rules... But that's just my opinion
@sebulller3 жыл бұрын
wait theres a live thing about this? huu
@AlarchyGaming3 жыл бұрын
I literally only watched the live action for patrick stewart and thats it
@saladasss20923 жыл бұрын
why desn't the NK starving people do something about their situation? They are hundreds of starving people that are in that situation. Just, they don't have media.
@Billious3 жыл бұрын
The live action was actually directed by a man who escaped the Soviet Union and saw its fall. Which is why the ending is the way it is.
@WillieManga3 жыл бұрын
I must say, the pigs slowly blurring the line between man and beast was essential and I am glad it was implemented in the movie.
@aclown364 жыл бұрын
*Animal Crossing: New Horizons,* *the Rated R version*
@itriggerpeople44334 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@JimVonSchmittou4 жыл бұрын
I-
@cmlmonstar0074 жыл бұрын
Comrade Tim actually pg13 original cartoon TV movie pg
@recon_cat61674 жыл бұрын
@@tthung8668 lol was gonna say the same thing
@cocolover12374 жыл бұрын
Get this man to the top
@aidanveldman13786 жыл бұрын
Don’t talk about the anime if you haven’t read the manga
@Ben-uc8ms6 жыл бұрын
^This
@theadamfriedlandshow46686 жыл бұрын
Amen
@Zigtyr6 жыл бұрын
What sort of bad stuff happens in the manga?
@dutchvanderlinde58556 жыл бұрын
Sigtyr Well, the animals don’t win in the book. In fact, the animals don’t even revolt at all in the book. They just look at the pigs and humans and can’t tell the difference between them.
@slightlyistorical17766 жыл бұрын
Rancid Cheese don’t read Manga and don’t watch Anime
@pepsidoggo15985 жыл бұрын
wait, George Orwell, same one who made 1984?
@funnguis81635 жыл бұрын
Yep! He made 1984 as well. Some books of animal farm also have 1984 in the same book.
@IdiotPhD5 жыл бұрын
Ye.
@dracocrusher5 жыл бұрын
Not really too surprising in hindsight, I think. The guy definitely seemed to have a strong desire to write stories based heavily around political ideologies and how they can become unfavorable for the common man.
@indisciipline5 жыл бұрын
Damn, I didn't know he made 1984. I enjoyed Animal Farm, guess I should read that other book!
@selkkie66915 жыл бұрын
@@indisciipline He's written more books, if you liked animal farm read his other books they're all really good.
@Milty2001 Жыл бұрын
I love the fact that the pigs became the very thing they hated, and seeing the pups turn into huge hound dogs was pretty dark. Especially when the donkey in the movie looks at the window and sees the pigs wearing suits and walking on two legs
@hiddendesire307610 ай бұрын
It’s accurate as well politically speaking. Those who claimed to be anti-fascists and against central government have they themselves embraced fascist tactics, barbarism, and calls for totalitarian regimes where no criticism of their “glorious” ideology is allowed.
@T-minus-infinite3 жыл бұрын
The creepy chanting is where the animals sing a song in the book Edit: In the book the animals justify wings counting as legs because wings are used for movement like legs but arms aren't used to walk
@testerwulf33573 жыл бұрын
Anything used for travel is a leg to them basically.
@seanmacguire33243 жыл бұрын
Beasts of England , Beasts of Ireland,
@whitedragoness233 жыл бұрын
Eh, either way wings are features humans don’t have so I guess the wording animal characteristics wouldn’t have flowed nicely with the pigs transformation
@LocalIdiot3882 жыл бұрын
They are probably singing (In My Opinion) "The Internationale"
@T-minus-infinite2 жыл бұрын
@@seanmacguire3324 yes that was it
@ammarpratama12035 жыл бұрын
Random farmer: Uses a gun like a club Me: *He a little bit confused, but he got the spirit*
@unherolike4 жыл бұрын
I think the idea is they were trying to take back control of the farm not kill all the animals.
@IAmTheStig324 жыл бұрын
[laughs in 18th century soldier when he's just fired his one bullet]
@soul67334 жыл бұрын
Laugh in WW2 soldiers who refused to shoot germans because afraid of them shooting back. In a war.
@YourMiddleBroPhil4 жыл бұрын
Brings a whole new meaning to the term "gun club"
@Mafon26 жыл бұрын
there's a joke in X-Men, where guards mocking Beast for reading kiddie book "Animal Farm".
@nomadicvaquero27916 жыл бұрын
*Hol up*
@theuserintheroom44506 жыл бұрын
It was a political satire.
@Teddybear67756 жыл бұрын
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
@bluedragonfly81395 жыл бұрын
And then he destroys them with a very apt summary of it. It was a beautiful scene.
@MrAlmindore583 жыл бұрын
Can we take a moment to reflect that Steve's doctor is Dr. Jones, and the farmer ALSO has that surname?
@cthulhufhtagn24835 жыл бұрын
7:08 The exact phrase the pig uses in the book is that the wing "is an organ of locomotion, rather than manipulation", which works well enough for me.
@darthvader29944 жыл бұрын
yea i don't get why they didn't just keep that in rather than just "wings = legs"
@rhiannonm60224 жыл бұрын
@@darthvader2994 because it's a 'kids' movie and that would be too confusing
@pugachan99285 жыл бұрын
Cant wait for Netflix live action adaptation starring Amy smucher as napoleon.
@katejuricak79415 жыл бұрын
Omg 😂😂😂😂
@Chaotic_Observer5 жыл бұрын
My god! 😆😆
@gubadagoober5 жыл бұрын
No not napoleon vladimir lenin
@pulletpocket5 жыл бұрын
You mean Mr. Jones?
@anon95795 жыл бұрын
Good role for her because she is a pig lol
@HunhowsShadowStalker6 жыл бұрын
>Implying Animal Farm was ever meant for children. I'm so disappointed.
@bigmeknurgle6 жыл бұрын
It was a cartoon movie released in 1954. Two years later VHS was invented. You think parents, throughout the 60's, 70's and 80's, browsing through videos for low-effort childminding tools (a kid wont wander about or hurt himself if he's sat still watching a film for 2 hours) would look at the cover and think "CLEARLY this is not for children", and thus no child ever saw it? Also, your newfriend status is showing, ass. Such clever people in youtube comment sections. I'm so disappointed.
@srgtshocwave6 жыл бұрын
bigmeknurgle I... I think he was joking bud...
@HunhowsShadowStalker6 жыл бұрын
@@bigmeknurgle Wow, someone's in a bad mood. I was clearly joking and pointing out a mistake he made when he referred to the video as if it were a children's movie. You should probably develop a sense of humor, because you're acting like an asshole without one.
@thearchive7926 жыл бұрын
@@bigmeknurgle Oh now that's E D G Y
@bigmeknurgle6 жыл бұрын
@??? It wasn't a mistake, the film was advertised and sold as a childrens movie. The content doesn't matter after mommy and daddy have spent their money and left junior in front of the TV for a few hours. So get over it? _Edit; comedy is subjective, and the OP wasn't funny. It was aloof bragging that came from the assumption of knowing-it-all._ @Ivan Jocic Lotsa butthurt wannabe commies, it seems. With the 10 global monopolies controlling every type of consumable, you think that's gonna happen anytime soon? You think your local government will allocate funds so you can have a chocolate bar or a can of energy drink in your monthly rations? Lol no
@Floorbie_Nana2 жыл бұрын
Somewhat fun fact: George Orwell himself described his story as “an animal fable” as if it were just a fun fairytale
@sudokuacrobatics11 ай бұрын
Yeah, it is a fairy tale compared to 1984 😂
@bretonloveland3 ай бұрын
All fables are dark. They have to be.
@lordstumpy29454 жыл бұрын
Even as a kid though I feel like animal farm tells an especially important story, or moral rather, that should be taught more often to children as propaganda, though maybe not as harmful, is still very rife today and thinking for yourself in a world where everyone is more easily influenced by the media is still as important as it always was.
@Shlankyman5453 жыл бұрын
I love you and this comment
@jaskitstepkit71533 жыл бұрын
It's a warning about greed creating tyranny while undermining every noble cause
@elltheclown42852 жыл бұрын
I agree, i was forced to read the book for school and i liked it my biggest complaint is how all the characters are one dimensional
@shannonmcelroy84542 жыл бұрын
@@elltheclown4285 I agree, I won't lie about the book's simplicity, and the characters being less developed. Although in the story's context, I feel it is justified given that it's more story focused than character focused. George Orwell often wrote because he wanted to give an important message, and in this case there are times where more developed characters can overwhelm the story and make the reader less inclined to listen when the characters are put through the wringer. By distancing the reader from the depths of character feelings, it helps them swallow the more unsavory features of the story.
@ironybob5 жыл бұрын
Fact : it’s illegal in France to call a pig Napoleon
@motherofdogs79805 жыл бұрын
LeRaptorFrançais I think it's because of this movie
@juliamavroidi86014 жыл бұрын
That's why in the french version if the book Napoleon is called César
@CedricsSpecialLP4 жыл бұрын
Julia Mavroidi I think that was what Orwell originally wanted to call him.
@anissayessaad47374 жыл бұрын
Ah bon?
@Thegamergabe4.04 жыл бұрын
Funny how Wario knows this. Love you Wah!!
@jacknewell18474 жыл бұрын
as to his question on "Four legs good, Two legs bad", in the original novel by George Orwell, Snowball explained that the wings of the birds should be thought of as "an instrument of propulsion", and was considered a leg. also, the original book is a satire to the rise (and moral fall) of the Soviet Union. the "hog", or as he was called in the book, "Old Major" represented Vladimir Lenin, Snowball represented Leon Trotsky, while Napoleon represented Joseph Stalin. the reason all the animals just "go along with it" was because they were written to represent the ill-educated and leaderless Soviet Masses. The Russian people had for years suffered under the oppressive rule of the Tsars. For this reason, they would accept any situation that they believed to be superior to than what they had before (edit): I have been informed that my analysis does not cover enough content. I will now rectify this issue that has been brought to my attention. Ahem: The Nine Dogs in the book represent Stalin's boys, a mixture of the KGB and elements of the red army, beating down dissidents and suppressing "deviant opinions". They are comparable to the Thought Police in George Orwell's 1984. The Sheep, Fowl, Cows, and other assorted livestock are the Proletariat, the "proles", the Great Unwashed. Working class, blue collar people, common folk, the peasantry and factory workers that made up the actual labour force of the Soviet Union, who the revolution was initially intended to serve. However, they are too poorly educated, brainwashed and, due to short lifespans/generational gaps, did not understand that their situation was becoming rapidly more Authoritarian and that their conditions where not in fact improving. An excellent sequence in 1984 best portrays this, when Winston has to seek out an old man to learn about life before the revolution, because nearly everyone else is too caught up in the Party's propaganda to remember the truth. Benjamin represents the portion of the population made up of educated but nihilistic ageing middle class people, such as teachers, political thinkers, military officers and revolutionaries who survived Stalin's purges (represented by Napoleon chasing Snowball off the farm and intimidating animals into confessing to imaginary crimes), people who understand that their situation is worsening but feel powerless/indifferent too it. In the book, this is shown by his ability to read and remember the revisions made to the rules, but his inactivity. The Horses, particularly Boxer, represent the revolutionary loyalists, the leaders or organisations such as labour unions or weak-minded government officials. These people blindly believed the uplifting messages of Lenin, Trotsky and Marx, and put forward the enormous effort required to make them a reality, but where not intelligent enough to avoid their fates. The Men represent THEM. It doesn't really matter who THEY are, they are simply the Great, Evil, Opposing mass that wants to tear down the GLORIOUS REVOLUTION, and will succeed without your blind loyalty. They want to return things to the way they where, and have been called by many names, the Tsar's loyalists, Monarchists, Anarchists, Capitalists, Nazis, or the least popular minority of the week. While they do occasionally pose opposition to the Farm, their threat is exaggerated and conditions under the Tsars are made to seem untenable. This fear is used to keep the Proles in line, without the use of force. You must work harder Commrade, or Jones will come back. You dont want that, do you? The pigeons that fly to other farms are stand-ins for the Communists who scattered across the globe, intending to spread the revolution world-wide. Such political idealists appeared globally, and fought in conflicts such as The Spanish Civil War and WW2. I am too tired to think of any more right now, but if anyone wants to suggest any, I will take a stab at it. I really dont want to do the Generic "OMGthanks4AllDaLikesUGUYSLOL" thing, so I will instead say this: I find it genuinely uplifting, that in this age of mass media and fleeting trends, there are some people who still continue to discuss and converse about such amazing material as Animal Farm. I am honored that this post has garnered as much attention attention as it has, and would love to discuss this topic further. Vinaka VakaLevu Bosso Levu. Good evening ladies and gentlemen. (I am well aware that I just did the thing I said I didnt want to do, but I did it with a British Accent, so there. Your criticisms have been rendered meaningless by my expert rebuttal).
@ryuzakikurai7114 жыл бұрын
The animals being poorly educated sheeple doesn't fly when Benjamin demonstrated intelligence comparable to the pigs on several occasions. He was basically being set up as the solution only to be ignored at the tail end of the book for the sake of a tragic ending.
@night-seeker6664 жыл бұрын
@@ryuzakikurai711 The reason Benjamin does nothing in the books has to do with his cynical attitude that the movie never explored.
@brandonlyon7303 жыл бұрын
@@ryuzakikurai711Benjamin was extremely cynical, he knew how everything really was but he knew he would never get anywhere explaining to a bunch of idiot animals. He knew the game was rigged from the start and pointing it out would do nothing but get him killed by the pigs.
@plugshirt16843 жыл бұрын
@@ryuzakikurai711 one person with intelligence isn’t enough when everyone is brainwashed already and fearful plus if they tried anything they would most likely lose to the nine dogs. Funnily enough some of them are literal sheep
@plugshirt16843 жыл бұрын
@@saberswordsmen1 to be fair though they did only do the allegories of four characters
@pyr8212 жыл бұрын
10:07 Chickens: Rebel against the pigs Napoleon: orders the dogs to kill the cat for no reason
@Antonio-fj5gs2 жыл бұрын
Me: oh my god Ok lol.
@3D-67 ай бұрын
It said that the innocent die with the guilty
@felipemontero10874 ай бұрын
Almost as if Communism kills everyone for no reason
@doublebubblebarb76063 ай бұрын
Right? I don’t understand that
@safiramisantrop82636 жыл бұрын
Animal Farm... from George Orwell... author of the 1984... for kids. Right :D Someone needs a little lesson from history of literature :D
@bigmeknurgle6 жыл бұрын
animated movies featuring talking animals aren't normally bought by adults for adults to watch. But yes, you know the origin, mad props. Shame you're not clever enough to realise that it ended up in many children's video libraries because of the visuals, not the subject matter. _You'll laugh! You'll cry a little! At the antics of the animals on Animal Farm! The wonder-full length technicolour cartoon!_ - on the front cover of the VHS case "Yeah, that'll keep little Timmy quiet for an hour or two, into the shopping basket it goes." Aaaaand that's why it's always been referred to as a kids movie. Yeah, 54 years later you're so smart for catching on. Gimme a fucking break, lady. Learn your own damn history.
@safiramisantrop82636 жыл бұрын
@@bigmeknurgle I remember writting this, bud I didn't know it sound that stupid. Anyway, I know that it ended up in children's hands because of visuals. Every animated movie is for kids, right. And I also find that stupid cover. It took me a little time, but I find it, and it's stupid, bud the adults should known better, bud I can understand they need break, so the people should let known better, that Animal farm is not for kids.
@notaseagull33206 жыл бұрын
I think the real problem is the marketing and/or making an animated film that looked just like classic Disney movies.
@therecklessabandable6 жыл бұрын
@@safiramisantrop8263 He's not talking about the book though. He's talking about a film funded by the CIA to be marketed to children so that they are indoctrinated against communism before they can understand what it is. The film just happens to be an adaptation of a book that wasn't meant for children
@butlerstarheart96796 жыл бұрын
99% This film isn't meant for kids. Just because it look like a Disney's movie cloned. 99% The same time when Disney release Sleeping Beauty and Lady and the Tramp one year before, or after. Even the birth of Saturday Moarning Cartoons. How weird & obscured for animation's that decade
@jessebrown19966 жыл бұрын
It was literally rated G on release................
@izzycrybaby11646 жыл бұрын
All of Disney's movies themselves are spin-offs of dark stories. Google "Brothers Grimm". And the movies that weren't inspired by those dark tales often had racist undertones in them back in the old days.
@Greggers15164 жыл бұрын
The movie definitely isn’t as notorious as the book. Don’t see how you reached that conclusion
@thatsalotofsodiumcoins16153 жыл бұрын
I didn’t know that there was a movie lol and this definitely was never meant to be a kids book/movie
@luigi78343 жыл бұрын
I have read the book and heard about the live action movie but I've never seen this one until this video
@gravediggey60163 жыл бұрын
The movie didn't have as much of a dark ending as the book.
@bruhmoment62043 жыл бұрын
@@gravediggey6016 what happened during the end ?
@jacknewell18473 жыл бұрын
@@bruhmoment6204 In the end, the animals watch the Pigs and Men playing cards, congratulating each other on how well they had tricked the animals into working for their benefit. The last paragraph shows that they where no longer able to tell the cruelty of the Pigs from the cruelty of the Men, saying: “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
@ming-tachang9882 жыл бұрын
I remember watched this film on Taiwan's TV once about 1989-90. I was shocked when Boxer was taken and Benjamin chasing the wagon part, I was hoping that something would happen to save that poor horse as what would happened in most Disney's films. Few years later I had chance to read the book in 9th grade literature and suddenly remembered the film I watched as kid. Great book and film, too bad that is not well known in Asia.
@Tippex_Official4 жыл бұрын
Steve: why when we brits get involved in animation, it’s always about animal cruelty? Me: well, when you consider that peppa pig is a psychopath, yeah.
@sillycat1034 жыл бұрын
I mean she DID eat bacon that one time
@AhmedEx1.4 жыл бұрын
@@sillycat103 excuse me *what*
@ryuzakikurai7114 жыл бұрын
Tbf everyone in that universe is a psychopath
@mechagodzilla36743 жыл бұрын
hey you plague doc too
@serenitythesiren50313 жыл бұрын
My friend once told me about this episode of Peppa pig when Peppa was eating Sausages in the kitchen and Daddy pig came in and asked where George wasXD
@Teag_Brohman153 жыл бұрын
Orwell would've hated the Ending to this movie
@plugshirt16843 жыл бұрын
Yeah it feels like they wanted a happy ending to the movie but it just doesn’t fit at all and degrades the message
@72o0_Tehran2 жыл бұрын
To be fair,it basically predicted the collapse of the soviet union
@KrimCLmusic2 жыл бұрын
I think the Movie’s Ending can be interpretated as a cycle, since the new Leader would also repeat the previous leader’s (Napoleon) actions, pretty much like politics most of the times
@RaeNapier646 жыл бұрын
ANIMAL FARM WAS NEVER MEANT FOR CHILDREN!!!!! IT WAS BASED OFF A GEORGE ORWELL NOVEL. A TYPICALLY DARK ADULT CENTRIC AUTHOR WHO SPECIALIZED IN POLITICAL/SOCIAL COMMENTARY. IF YOU LET YOUR CHILD READ/ WATCH HIS WORK THEN THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM NOT OURS
@ammla82196 жыл бұрын
Rae Napier Ik
@cyperus45896 жыл бұрын
I REALLY HATE SHOUTING ONLINE!!!!
@jacobmorrison44806 жыл бұрын
I’m doing the book for gcse
@Shift126 жыл бұрын
Was looking to see if someone else had mentioned this fact. Just because its a cartoon that doesn't nesecarrily mean that it's for children, for an extreme comparison would you let a child watch Fritz the Cat? Or would you say Fritz is suitable for children?
@Purplefire07966 жыл бұрын
Rae Napier my high school made me read and watch Animal Farm. This was the first year of high school at least for me
@felinoidrose2 жыл бұрын
6:04 animals in minecraft taking damage
@floproro4 Жыл бұрын
Minecraft animals revolting against the players for attacking them:
@oakleyjacket79226 жыл бұрын
6:57 “Seven Commandments could be in effect reduced to a single maxim, namely “four legs good, two legs bad” This, he (snowball) said contained the essential principle of Animalism. Whoever had throughly grasped it would be safe from human influences. The birds at first objected, since it seemed that they also had two legs, but snowball proved to them that this was not so “A bird’s wing, comrades,” he said, “is an organ of propulsion and not of manipulation. It should therefore be regarded as a leg. The distinguishing mark of man is the hand, the instrument with which he does all his mischief” -Animal farm book by George Orwell, page 34, paragraphs 1 and 2
@davidhatcher70166 жыл бұрын
no
@oakleyjacket79226 жыл бұрын
Yes
@jayesper43906 жыл бұрын
Good for him that ostriches and the like are conspicuously absent from farms.
@wanderer_42_6 жыл бұрын
K
@Ludovicus17693 жыл бұрын
When you said that the CIA funded it, I couldn’t stop laughing, I knew what the book was about.
@Iamjustthatguy2 жыл бұрын
When he was taking about the part of how napoleon controlled the animals in the farm it reminds me of the book 1984
@vin54862 жыл бұрын
@@Iamjustthatguy they were written by same authors too
@Sumautisticguy2 жыл бұрын
The CIA made sure the ending was changed so napoleon was overthrown
@kaisaleh72682 жыл бұрын
Right???
@lunablanca47842 жыл бұрын
For more context: Orwell supported Spain's Republic (this means there was no king, it not the same meaning the US gave to the word Republican). This didn't mean Spain was becoming a communist country, just that there was no king. No country supported this republic as much as some (in that moment) fascist countries supported the rebels. Ironically enough, the US negotiated with Spain's former dictator when they considered the country an ally to stop communism.
@TheKnightLikeGamer5 жыл бұрын
The book is way scarier than the movie, seriously read it. Or watch the music video for "the nature of the beast " it tells a really good modern version of it
@allyy08705 жыл бұрын
DUDE I KNOW THAT YOU WERE JUST BRINGING THAT UP BUT LIKE I LOVE ICE NINE KILLS, THE BAND THAG MADE THAT SONG, TO DEATH AND I MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE SCREECHED WHEN I READ THIS COMMENT-
@bestrobloxparodies56245 жыл бұрын
The book is pretty a-ok
@b_crystals11 ай бұрын
“The animals looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again, but it was already impossible to tell which was which” I GASPED AT THAT
@quirkykirkplays5 жыл бұрын
7:08 I seem to recall in the novel this was explained by saying that wings are a limb of locomotion rather than manipulation, so they did count as legs. It's been a few years since I read the book though
@Bbillnyethe4 жыл бұрын
I believe you are on the money
@mckaylamarille86304 жыл бұрын
That sounds pretty accurate
@samirjohnson45244 жыл бұрын
I am currently reading the book for a book review, and I can confirm that this is indeed accurate to the novel.
@chupacadabra51616 жыл бұрын
Steve: So, the animals start to build Snowball's- Napolean: *REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE* Steve: I mean Napolean's windmill.
@ubdrift59046 жыл бұрын
LOL
@ubdrift59046 жыл бұрын
@LordDonut1122 I think it means 4 leg animals and 2 leg humans/farmers
@ubdrift59046 жыл бұрын
@LordDonut1122 thank you for knowing what they mean
@BrownGaijin6 жыл бұрын
Nice!
@KonjakTheSober5 жыл бұрын
In the book they say that fourlegs are good and two legs are okay if you also have wings
@anon95795 жыл бұрын
They declare that because wings are a means of propulsion not manipulation thats what the book says
@johnnyjoestar64785 жыл бұрын
KonjakTheSober because wings are a tool of propulsion and not manipulation
@videohistory7225 жыл бұрын
Then towards the end, it's changed to four legs good, two legs BETTER.
@Spoonable5 жыл бұрын
videohistory722 cause the pigs started walking in two legs I think
@ThatOneKaijuFan Жыл бұрын
When the hogfather pig died, i got an ad for the wendy’s baconator and couldn’t stop wheezing
@themaskedhec95966 ай бұрын
Copied
@Anthony-hi7bw6 жыл бұрын
Had to watch it in 7th grade, we knew it was violent, we watched it because we were learning about communism and soviet Russia and North Korea. I remember “all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” written on the barn by the pigs, dark movie.
@SwedishEmpire17006 жыл бұрын
As it should be, but i doubt they show this at all anymore since it would upset the commie kids.
@khldwb14256 жыл бұрын
Hobo same
@Anthony-hi7bw6 жыл бұрын
jandm600 yeah it is and our teacher told us that.
@toastedpigs45526 жыл бұрын
Hobo I’m in grade 7 rn and my teacher made us watch it because we were learning about communism
@Anthony-hi7bw6 жыл бұрын
Krmet its all propaganda, the American school system hasn’t been updated since the industrial revolution, so grade 7 social studies is learning about hostile nations and rogue countries. You might learn about North Korea as well.
@Fubukio5 жыл бұрын
Animal Farm is not all bad... It makes eating bacon much more satisfying.
@otaldoperes5 жыл бұрын
Truth is Truth
@Artizap_5 жыл бұрын
Yes I wanted to take that little bitch Squealer and turn him into bacon. Sadly, he’s just a fictional character.
@gameknight99565 жыл бұрын
Dang you need more agreement
@Matkaizer085 жыл бұрын
And that's why pigs are for eating and nothing else!
@penguinhowser84595 жыл бұрын
I want to eat Napoleon
@faheemhaque7395 жыл бұрын
Steve: you sickos Me: ........ aren’t you the one who is reviewing this?
@Loopimay4 жыл бұрын
Hey, he never said he wasn't a sicko too
@jatman95564 жыл бұрын
We are sickos too for watching this review sooooo :/
@wlf-kidri70084 жыл бұрын
Shit, I love gory movies. Regardless. I'm glad I found his channel because I've seen some great creepy and fecked up movies.
@Joannefibracs99944 жыл бұрын
Nah, he’s got us pegged
@CJ-hp6fb3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Orwell's real name is Eric- the reason why he changed his name is that he didn't want ppl to know his true name or identity and he also wanted to start fresh when he started writing articles.
@MyUniqueBeauty6 жыл бұрын
Four legs good, two legs bad! Four legs good, two legs bad! Four legs good, two legs bad!
@reese17196 жыл бұрын
Four legs good, two legs better! Four legs good, two legs better! Four legs good, two legs better!
@CarlosAugusto-rv6op6 жыл бұрын
Orange man bad
@raynova80556 жыл бұрын
But... the geese...
@harlanrichards47656 жыл бұрын
@@reese1719 fuck he beat me to it
@justinalder9546 жыл бұрын
Birds dude (We all read the book)
@dr.bright62725 жыл бұрын
Man: *okay I have this loaded gun, what can I use it for? Oh I know, a bat!*
@justmetal2275 жыл бұрын
you can see that with each confrontation also the force escalates more and more
@SangerZonvolt5 жыл бұрын
"They won´t see it coming!"
@parrot14425 жыл бұрын
This mans a Genius..... I like using my gun like how I use my guitar.... LIKE A BAT
@jebcoe5 жыл бұрын
Snowballs reasoning of Wings are legs goes like this. (From book btw) Wings are limbs of propulsion, as are legs, while arms are limbs of manipulation. Four Limbs of Propulsion good, two limbs of manipulation bad.
@burntbacn5 жыл бұрын
That... actually does make sense.
@TheLuigiBrother775 жыл бұрын
@@burntbacn its not meant to make sense
@littlemoth49565 жыл бұрын
@@TheLuigiBrother77 What?
@TheLuigiBrother775 жыл бұрын
@@littlemoth4956 snowballs reasoning isnt meant to make sense
@Jordan-wc6nh5 жыл бұрын
TheLuigiBrother77 but it does make sense
@LOLPot2410 ай бұрын
"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."
@savathunthewitchqueen82995 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: i had to watch this for my 7th grade American history class to learn about dictatorship vs democracy. I wasn't traumatized at all as a child, but the scence to where most were killed did scare me a little bit.
@mediatorraptor33494 жыл бұрын
I watched it by accident on youtube as kid. I still dont know how managed to watch the whole movie as kid.
@unsuspiciousdweller89674 жыл бұрын
Glad to see other kids watched this as well. Same thing happened here in australia
@rbswords23534 жыл бұрын
Differences are: no Molly,the carthorse,Moses the raven isn't there to tell them of Sugar Hill Mountain, the animals are ignorant to "Boxer's" demise,Boxer never says"I will work harder."No name of the mother dog Jessie,no show trials of many animals,Snowball doesn't die,he just flees,a dog attacks Boxer,Old Major dies later on after their meeting,no Mrs Jones here,Squealer isn't mentioned,obviously the pigs aren't taken down at the end.They don't even call each other "comrade" like in the book.
@night-seeker6664 жыл бұрын
First of all, it's Sugarcandy Mountain, not Sugar Hill Mountain, that's just ridiculous. Second of all, I think its implied that Snowball is killed. Third, Squealer is mentioned and appears in the film. Finally, the pigs DO refer to each other as comrade.
@lambadajewo.41434 жыл бұрын
In the book it was said that nobody has ever seen Snowball again after he's been banished, but it's never said that he died.
@vivaciousmyosotis4 жыл бұрын
Also Boxer has said I will work harder
@vivaciousmyosotis4 жыл бұрын
Also the ribbons were pink in the movie and green in the book
@lambadajewo.41434 жыл бұрын
@@vivaciousmyosotis If I remember correctly, they were red. People used to put the red ribbons in manes of biting horses.
@grumpy_roo4 жыл бұрын
I remember we read the book, watched the animated AND live action movie back in English class in 9th grade. It was indeed fucked but it didn’t scar me that bad. It was kinda intriguing ngl
@spazman77354 жыл бұрын
Hi moxie
@grumpy_roo4 жыл бұрын
@@spazman7735 Hello there, Al
@spazman77354 жыл бұрын
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@Void_Wars3 жыл бұрын
What the hell?
@Avarice2973 жыл бұрын
@@Void_Wars I know, super cringy.
@singamummy84202 жыл бұрын
The scene where boxer is taken away and benjiman is running after him makes me cry every single time
@simplychaff18755 жыл бұрын
Did you really say that the movie is more well known than the book? The book has sold over 30 million copies dude.
@awolfnamedgarry86335 жыл бұрын
*(Didn't even know there was a movie, has done three essays on this and loves the book to death)*
@quantum66925 жыл бұрын
@@awolfnamedgarry8633 bold for attention and also is a furry. mental illness at its best
@tvoovm72545 жыл бұрын
@@quantum6692 trolling at its finest... for your dumbass.
@awolfnamedgarry86335 жыл бұрын
I was implying that I have researched this so many times and still didn't know there was an animated movie, showing how well known it was. @@quantum6692.
@juicyjuustar1215 жыл бұрын
Yeah, like wtf. I didn't know there was a movie of it until now.
@supernovatv95146 жыл бұрын
8:03 in the book, Snowball never actually dies; I don’t think we ever learn what actually happens to Snowball.
@samishes14346 жыл бұрын
What we know though is that Trotsky dies in Mexico 1940 from mysterious circumstances and since Snowball is based on him, we can presume that he died in the book as well.
@supernovatv95146 жыл бұрын
Mr Universe ...yeah, Snowball most likely died at some point in the book, but I’m pretty sure he wasn’t killed immediately after being driven out of the farm, as it was implied in the video. We’re never explicitly told either way, but in the book, it’s at least implied that he makes it out successfully. Hence why Napoleon blames him for the destruction of the first windmill they try to build.
@samishes14346 жыл бұрын
@@supernovatv9514 yeah sure, but Trotsky didn't die till years later too
@someman666 жыл бұрын
Actually, I think that the book says that he died, but in "another farm".
@westonkouryfan696 жыл бұрын
It doesnt say whether he lived or not, but it does say he lives at a neighboring farm then napoleon just uses this to say he has been spreading the wrong message?? Its been a while since ive read it but i think thats it
@3digitsonthebac1565 жыл бұрын
No-one: Any animal on Animal Farm: *C O M R A D E*
@LadyGrey2605 жыл бұрын
No Name Oml your profile pic is perfect for this
@AlfredPennyworth20175 жыл бұрын
Yes just yes
@yeethittter12855 жыл бұрын
No-one: Sheep: *_four legs good, two legs bad_*
@papastalin86565 жыл бұрын
NOICE
@autisticduck30715 жыл бұрын
Lucky Vine It's time for a rebellion against memers comrade!
@burleybater2 жыл бұрын
I recall Animal Farm as a nice lite read just on the downside of middle school, still just barely young enough to appreciate the fantasy fun and frolic. Those were solid Cold War days (the October crisis just fading backward in the rear view mirror). And even a kid could sense the allegorical symbolism of animals behaving like humans. I always thought of Animal Farm as a perfect predecessor to 1984, which showed up in my life a couple of years later, 'round about grade 8. Which led to high school wanderings through The Road to Wigan Pier and Down and Out in Paris and London. My main beef with Orwell at that time was that there just wasn't enough of him. Other than John Wyndham, there weren't enough other distractions from that particular era. I always suspected from the get-go that Orwell utilized the natural affinity that kids have for animals to create a kind of primer in authoritarian tyranny, easy to understand and translate into real-world terms as we grew up.
@TheChildofAuraReborn4 жыл бұрын
My parents brought this movie home from the local library for my sister and I to watch; they thought it was supposed to be some cute little kids' movie about farm animals. My sister and I watched it alone together and the horse getting his knees shot out plus when he was dragged to the glue factory traumatized us both. We were both very much left wondering "What ungodly movie did we just watch?"
@realyoriginalchanel32184 жыл бұрын
It was supposed to be methapor for communism. It was badly marketed to children as the book is supposed to be a social commentary.
@lambadajewo.41434 жыл бұрын
It was literally marketed using the slogan "you will laugh and cry a little", yeah...
@bilbowagons79325 жыл бұрын
Old Major = Karl Marx Napoleon = Joseph Stalin Snowball = Leon Trotsky Boxer = working middle class Squealer = Institutional Propaganda/managers Moses =Institutional Religion This whole movie has communism written all over it
@scarletshadow45485 жыл бұрын
Snowball=Trotsky
@boistired68255 жыл бұрын
your phone isn't cracked Old Major: Lenin Farmer Jones: Nicolas II Boxer: the good worker
@natalijatheghost5 жыл бұрын
That's what it was based on
@jacoba34225 жыл бұрын
your phone isn't cracked Second war= more like the battle of Stalingrad
@sophiatalksmusic35885 жыл бұрын
Boxer= the working class, Moses the raven= religion, Mollie= the bourgeoisie
@JetSetWave4 жыл бұрын
You know its bad when even the Crow turns its head in horror.
@ushankabg Жыл бұрын
Did you know? In France is illegal to name your pig Napoleon.
@annabanana76595 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, back when I was eight, my mum bought VHS copies of Watership Down, Felidae, Animal Farm and Grave of the Fireflies along with Disney movies and Anastasia. I can still hear my parents whispering 'Wtf is this?' while watching in the living room. It really explains my morbid sense of humor.
@AlphaTengua5 жыл бұрын
the last unicorn lol
@annabanana76595 жыл бұрын
@@AlphaTengua Funny enough, I didn't watch it until I was an adult. The harpy in that film was... interesting.
@TheDragiix35 жыл бұрын
GRAVE OF FIREFLIES FUCK THAT MOVIE
@annabanana76593 жыл бұрын
@Cøøp Two years late reply sorry about that. No, Animal Farm isn't really that well known in my country. Most of our literature revolves more on Noli me Tangere, El Filibusterismo and other Filipino stories.
@lurch16285 жыл бұрын
Steve’s childhood: *exists* Animal farm:I’m about to end this man’s whole career.
@mohify21745 жыл бұрын
I'm you're 100 like I'm excepting a thank you
@lurch16285 жыл бұрын
Mr. Chap thank you.
@mohify21745 жыл бұрын
@@lurch1628 :3
@AriaCodfish5 жыл бұрын
Plague dogs: Aww! That’s cute.
@Akeboun5 жыл бұрын
One could argue it started it...
@reallylongsnake3 жыл бұрын
The animated film actually stays fairly true to the original themes of the book, with only a few very minor changes. Most highschools in america have this book somewhere in their curriculum where every bit of it is dissected as the giant political metaphor that it is
@antonioricaud53083 жыл бұрын
A better word would be political satire or allegory.
@bellarawding64703 жыл бұрын
we got it in england too lmao
@trickstercj43662 жыл бұрын
My school used it as summer reading where you could either: a. Write a character study or b. Take a test to skip said study. I took the test and failed it since I didn't want to read and didn't read it. So I had to write the character study. I somehow found the book lying down in my school's gym/cafeteria and took it for my own and started reading it every day after school. I was throughly surprised how much I enjoyed the book all things considered.
@zeehero72802 жыл бұрын
It should be required reading. too many people these days think socialism is somehow NOT evil.
@tanimation72892 жыл бұрын
The biggest change is the ending.
@alwaysconfused16419 ай бұрын
I will say, the book does a wonderful job showing how Napoleon and Squealer (his right-hand) use propoganda to get the animals to believe everything they say. The animals don't just accept it; they are threatened by the dogs, given the idea of the old farmer coming back if they don't listen, and are blatantly gaslit over, and over, and over again. It's also noted that the large majority of animals can't read, and don't have good memory - which is why Squealer's gaslighting works so well. In the book, Squealer also trains the lesser educated, blindly loyal sheep to bleat "Four legs good, two legs bad!" every time someone wants to disagree with Napoleon, ensuring that his opposition's voices are literally never heard. By the end of the book, they are taught to bleat "four legs good, two legs BETTER!" as the pigs start walking on their hind legs. But this is comparing two completely different mediums. I think the movie loses the layers of symbolism the book has, but it still gets the message across. Plus all these extra details would have likely driven the movie way over budget.