Stop Misusing Quantum Physics: Consciousness Myth Debunked!

Рет қаралды 4,607

Astro Kshitij

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@Arpit_Explains Күн бұрын

Good work 👍👍👍 Keep it up

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

❌❌❌❌IF PROBLEM IS INTERACTION THEN WHY WAVE NATURE IS NOT COLLAPSING WHEN ELECTRON IS STRIKING SCREEN! IT ONLY CHANGES IT NATURE WHEN ITS EXACT POSITION IS TRIED TO "OBSERVED"!!! SO INSTEAD OF INTERACTION USE WORD "POSITION IS DETERMINED" AND THIS IS MAIN POINT THAT WAVE NATURE COLLAPSE WHEN IT IS OBSERVED AND PARTICLE REALITY APPEARS , IN CASE NO ONE TRIES TO DETERMINE POSITION IT WILL REMAIN WAVE AND" INTERACT" TOO WITH SCREEN OR WHATEVER IN WAVE NATURE ONLY

@aniketkoli4282 Күн бұрын

Heisenberg was influenced by conversations with Rabindranath Tagore, where they discussed the metaphysical ideas in Indian philosophy. The philosophical perspectives of interconnectedness and the nature of reality resonated with the emerging principles of quantum mechanics, which Heisenberg helped pioneer. He is claiming vedas are wrong by using vedas what a irony 😂😂 Arpit sir mohit guar pata hai

@HarshitB-nt1fm Күн бұрын

It may be possible that Heisenberg was influenced by philosophical ideas that but he had built up mathematical and physical backing of his theory by own.

@nilabhdash5461 Күн бұрын

@@aniketkoli4282 you literally proved kshitij's point of pseudo science 😂

@aniketkoli4282 Күн бұрын

@@HarshitB-nt1fm if that was illogical then he ignored vedas

@bigwiener-fr8gm Күн бұрын

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled. ☝🏻☝🏻

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@tgx6288 15 сағат бұрын

Like you bro

@Davinci9580 Күн бұрын

Sandeep maheshwari is doing the same on his spiritual channel, why is no one talking about that ??? 🤔🤔🤔 If u don't believe that then u can go watch his advanced spirituality part 6 . He was trying to explain the sound of silence mathematically 😢 ( I am not saying that he is completely wrong because that's not my expertise but some one should question him , he has a great influence)

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@CriticisedLoveGirl Күн бұрын

Yeah! We need a commentary of that!

@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc Күн бұрын

Sandeep is a evil person

@KaranKap Күн бұрын

Yes you are right, he is definitely a bigger threat than vishal chaurasiya.

@CriticisedLoveGirl Күн бұрын

We need to make this comment much engaged so that it comes on top and Kshitiz happens to see it!

@vickysaksena9568 Күн бұрын

YEH MIRROR 🎉🎉🎉KA EXAMPLE AAPNE BAHUT ACHA DIYA.. LAGE RAHEA AAP BAHUT AAGE JAYENGE GE ❤

@adnan.quddus 10 сағат бұрын

True. One of the best

@sidheart8905 Күн бұрын

knowing or making content about culture and religion is not bad, but they manipulate scientific theories according to their own need and misinform people , thanks for explaining in detail

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@eduviceya9647 16 сағат бұрын

Very Good,, keep uploading video like this,

@harshadmeshram6373 Күн бұрын

Hello Sir I Harshad from Nagpur pursuing my BS in Physics. I frequently watch your videos for my academics as well as for scientific temperament.And I am looking forward for my Ms in nanotechnology.So there is miniscule suggestion from your student, while giving any statement of any scientist there is necessity to come with written form in there book or an audio clip for that statement. I know it's not possible every time but as a student we must know the resources. And thank you for explanation.

@aryangautam_ 12 сағат бұрын

"Photons are everywhere, like in the form of visible light. So why don’t these photons interact with electrons and collapse their wave nature all the time? How does the wave behavior of electrons remain unaffected in everyday conditions?" I'm naive please don't judge if i have asked basic.

@astrokshitij 10 сағат бұрын

That’s actually a very good question, that’s why we conduct these experiments in noiseless environments. We always try to avoid quantum de coherence

@anoopsrana Күн бұрын

"Religion is where you follow everything. Science is where you challenge everything." ~A.S Rana

@kashanrizvi3419 Күн бұрын

So did you or he challenged every statement or theory or fact given by scientists or just accepted their sayings? Did you guys do lab tests to verify the concepts or not? Do you guys understand that religion and science don't share the same domian?

@rashidrazakhan9153 Күн бұрын

@@kashanrizvi3419knowledge has sources and authority is one among them.

@anoopsrana Күн бұрын

@kashanrizvi3419 Science is challenged everyday. That is why we were able to go to the moon, invent a covid vaccine etc. Religion is just people following the will of claimed god without asking why did god decided to kill 10 newborns in jhansi fire or why god just watched bilkis bano getting raped etc.

@JohnNobody_ Күн бұрын

@@kashanrizvi3419... No they don't, religion is concerned about morality and immaterial realm which science has very less to comment upon as it's primarily concerned with matter. That said, you clearly do not understand the concept of fact, theory and hypothesis. Facts are the basis, the foundation upon which one stands and measures the truth value of hypothesis which become a theory in case of a tautology and the model is constantly refined, this process does not claim infallibility like religion but always remains open to counter evidence which is convincing and capable of going thru the scientific process of validation and experimentation... Anyways, please tell me I'm not wasting my time on you as your mind is too thick with pseudo science and religion to even open up an inch to something called reason, as I'm clearly feeling by the end of this reply that I have wasted my time

@aniketkoli4282 Күн бұрын

@@anoopsrana then why still believes in big bang thoery ,

@humanjagriti Күн бұрын

Thank you sir bhout hi badiya video tha ek jabrdast jaankari mili hai sir ji,,,

@RajeshChhabra-yt5hv 2 сағат бұрын

Agar photon collide krta electron se to vo particle hota ... Jab hum koi light ni marte electron pr tab kya veh dark me tha .... ?? Means light to harjagah ha to electron tab kuy ni krta interact ...jab specially light ki jati tab hi kuy particle hojata?

@rohittekchandani5720 58 минут бұрын

Young's Double Slit Experiment ko bina light ke hi perform kiya jaata hai. Sirf screen par detectors hote hain jo interference pattern ko detect kar sakein. Koi additional disturbance nahin hota hai. Agar slits par detectors laga do to wave function collapse ho jaata hai, jis wajah se screen par interference pattern nahin milta.

@rivu9343 Күн бұрын

Oh man thanks, finally someone talked about this. The first time I heard about observer effect was from a reel where Neil deGrass Tyson was talking about it, and in that clip he said "How does the electron know that we are watching it" and the video ends. I wanted to know more about it and ChatGpt suggested Feynman lectures. I understood nothing but I kept at it and reread the chapters and then when things clicked. My first thought was that N.dg. tyson should have never said that...

@anoopkvpoduval Күн бұрын

When there's only single slit, and we trigger electrons without any pre-slit observations, we still get a single line on the screen. That means it's gone through the slit as a particle, not a wave. Why is this happening without any observation, any wave collapse ?

@pranav210591 Күн бұрын

The band pattern is a result of interference of two waves. For a single slit, there will be neither an interference nor a single band, but a diffraction pattern.

@LakshaySharma-gz9ky 20 сағат бұрын

@@pranav210591you are right

@LakshaySharma-gz9ky 20 сағат бұрын

quantam particles always act like a wave and in superposition only if we isolate them in experiments, quantam particles are not literally wave they just act like a wave mathematically and physically, and they always are in superposition, but when they have more than 1 probability (more than 1 slit) then they interfere with itself like a wave, that's why we see wave pattern on detector screen

@a-sk007 Күн бұрын

Thanks for this video. Nowadays Vishal has gone overboard with the idea that everything science has done is already available in vedas and related texts.

@thecontinental9670 Күн бұрын

WhatsApp university principal Sudhanshu bjp wala no harm here

@kakashi_vladivostok 4 сағат бұрын

Even the samajwadi party and tmc has radical madarsa graduates they are giving gyaan on Allah's world of gravity 😂😂😂

@semicolon6499 Күн бұрын

8:50 : कृष्ण कहते है की सब प्रकृति के गुणों से होता है । और हम जो चेतना है उसे हम अहंकार भी बोल सकते है उसे लगता है की मैं ने किया , मैं कररहा हू और Quantum mechanics का विषय लो तो मेने देखा इसलिए पार्टिकल का गुण चेंज हुवा 🤣🤣 ऐसे है हम अहंकारी ( चेतना ) । ये अहंकार के चलते हमारे मुर्ख धार्मिक लोग विज्ञान का अपमान करते है ।

@mukulrohilla9842 Күн бұрын

PBS vali video samajh nahi aayi, please make such explanation videos in Hindi.

@nilabhdash5461 Күн бұрын

Use gemini to translate and interprete

@shwetasinghnm 22 сағат бұрын

Wave travel karti hai to wave ki tarah ? Ye kaisi samajh hai. Jab tak observation nahi hua , tab tak particle exists only as a probability function , which can be said to be wave like. Particle existz in superpsition , meaning with probability less than one in all possible positions Copenhagen interpretation says that nothing can be said about what really happened on observation because the wave function is purely mathematical. Copenhagen interpretation is purely epistemological. It means there may or may not be a quantum world, QM just describes interactions in probabilistic / mathematical terms

@LakshaySharma-gz9ky 20 сағат бұрын

@ranjeetrawat9831 19 сағат бұрын

आम लोगों को ना तो sprituality का पता है न science या physics का। इसका फायदा ही विशाल जैसे लोग उठाते हैं।

@ipsitamishra0577 Күн бұрын

Thank Y🫡U...✍️🏾

@shwetasinghnm 22 сағат бұрын

Bhai. Aajtak koi consensus nahi hai about what QM means. Aapko saare interpretation batane chahiye. David Bohm 's pilot wave, Hugh Everett's many worlds, Chris Fuchs Qubism, Copenhagrlen. There is no correct interpretations

@VANSH760-o1e Күн бұрын

Bro love your videos

@shwetasinghnm 22 сағат бұрын

Bhai aap keh rahe hain " dekho saare bade scientist keh rahe hain ki consciosness ka lena dena nahi hai QM se to nahi hoga " . Ye kaisi argument hai. Aap bol sakte hain ki koi consensus nahi hai . Nobody knows hence hyperquest ko aise claims nahi karne chahiye

@darkjoker361 Күн бұрын

Conciousness has some role with quantum mechanics i read a research paper of on biology and quantum mechanics that has a possibility in making conciousness through superposition but its not proven

@dushyantdewangan294 Күн бұрын

wonderful explanation, sir🔥

@mrinmayroy3024 Күн бұрын

Thanks a lot to understand a easy way to confirm the correct

@achyuthcn2555 Күн бұрын

Bhakts are disrespecting Vedanta by comparing it with Quantum physics.... What Vedanta teaches is far advanced than science can ever discover.

@vikashpandey9230 Күн бұрын

Because bhakts don't understand even vedanta

@achyuthcn2555 Күн бұрын

@vikashpandey9230 Yes, They know nothing but proud of everything.

@upamanyu.baishya Күн бұрын

What Vedanta teaches is metaphysics and philosophy. Epistemologically it doesn't have much credibility. These are just few ideas in a cease pool of many different idea. You can choose to believe those ideas or not. Science deals with things we can verify. For example, it is scientific fact that life exists. We can verify it. Now what you make of life is a different question. You can find purpose or meaning of it but those are all metaphysical attributes. For example, you can believe god or some higher power has given you a purpose in life and you may do your best to find that and maybe eventually you'll end up finding that purpose but there is really no way to know if that purpose is truly your purpose or heck if even purpose exists or not. Therefore, you just have to belief in what suits you. Tell me one example of such thing that Vedanta teaches you which is more advanced that science and tell in what sense it is more advanced. this is a genuine question

@achyuthcn2555 Күн бұрын

@upamanyu.baishya , Read vedanta, For example Read Drg Drsya Viveka, Aparokshanubhuti, Aatma Bodha, Mandukya Upanishad etc books to know what vedanta is saying. Vedanta talks about "Brahman", the ultimate reality which is Ground of all being. Science has its limitations and hence it can never uncover Brahman. That's how Vedanta is far more advanced than Science. Purpose of life cannot be taken lightly as you put it bcz morals are based on what we think purpose of life is. Vedanta alsp gives us morals which Science can never hope to discover. So Vedanta is superior to Science in the matter of Ethics too..

@vikashpandey9230 Күн бұрын

@@upamanyu.baishya how much you have read vedanta ?

@AKA-f7p Күн бұрын

Bro why are you using wrong graphics for observed particles after double slit. That really causes major confusion among my classmates during the quantum mechanics course. Confusion was so much that a simple interpretation of low intensity photos and electron detection experiments was unacceptable to them. Please show them the gaussian distribution instead of two lines.

@shwetasinghnm 22 сағат бұрын

Also there is no correct interpretation of QM. Koi consensus nahi hai. Qubism is also an interpretation which brings in consciousness. Hugh Everett ki many worlds interpretation bhi hai which says quantum collapse is happening in multiple universes.

@randombooklover-r2t Күн бұрын

Please make a video on why people believe in pseudoscience.😊

@kashishjindal3258 Күн бұрын

I highly recommend you to make a review video on sandeep maheshwari advance spiritual 6th episode plsss

@kashishjindal3258 Күн бұрын

He talked about conciousness and quantum mechanic

@skumar8817 Күн бұрын

Squaring a circle-(Yajur vedam, Katyanana sulba, 3.14) , Pythagoras theorem - (ch 1.12 , Baudhayana Sutras, Kalpa , Yajur vedam) , GRAVITY - (4th shlokam,13th chapter ,Pancha Sidhantika) , Orbital velocity calculation - (5th slokam,2nd chapter,Surya Siddhantam), BINARY NUMBER SYSTEM (21st,22nd,23rd sutras,8th Chapter, Chhandas Shastra),Ascending Power of 10 -(Shukla Yajurvedam,17.2) , Sine wave ( 12th slokam,Gitika pada,Aryabhattia), Circling a square - (Yajur vedam,Katayana Sulba ,3.13)

@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc Күн бұрын

@@skumar8817 🤣😂🤣

@RamaChari-q5c Күн бұрын

Dekh liya kahi nhi diya hai

@darkjoker361 Күн бұрын

I saw but didn't find

@thecontinental9670 Күн бұрын

Abe chat gpt ke bhonde

@Vishalneet2025 Күн бұрын

tum reservation wale hote hi bandhmuddi ho

@Rupsadas-o1u Күн бұрын

Bohot bariya 👏👏👏

@aloneboy_0696 Күн бұрын

🔥❤️

@arjit-mi7rw Күн бұрын

bro sudhanshu trivedi ke tunni vigyaan par bhi video banao pls

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@luckysamal2823 Күн бұрын

Be rational⚛️❤

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@mrinmayroy3024 Күн бұрын

Curious 💫💫😀

@PrashantNanda Күн бұрын

ऊर्जा की अवस्था के कारण संवेदनाओं और चेतना में कुछ तो संबंध है ?

@anoopsrana Күн бұрын

"Religion has always been the hallmark of stupidity and foolishness. No other organisation keeps their people so paranoid as religion does." ~A.S Rana

@kashanrizvi3419 Күн бұрын

Nice try just look at the science lovers, they read bunch of papers released in some magazines like nature and believe in those. It's akin to what you believe that religion have books and texts and preachers which propagate stupidity and foolishness. Just in the case of followers of science, books are replaced by papers released in those magazines and preachers are replaced by scientists. These followers never verify the papers by conducting experiments or challenging the positions proposed. Oh sorry that's dogma. Multiverse can exist in view of many science followers. Pardon me did I just expose the dogma of science followers. Huh, science followers getting paranoid.

@meIanchoIia Күн бұрын

@@kashanrizvi3419bro after writing this bs paragraph 😎

@detectivesroy Күн бұрын

Mere opinion ko suite kare aise quotes likh deta hu cool lagaunga

@Jaat-jz8vg Күн бұрын

Meanwhile science: my body is 99 percent empty

@meIanchoIia Күн бұрын

@@Jaat-jz8vg why do you 60 iq people have to care about science's verdicts ? If i put you in a hydraulic press would your body get denser or not ?

@NirmayprasadYadav Күн бұрын

Bro's explanation 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿 Logic of sanatanis 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

@arjit-mi7rw Күн бұрын

Sanatanis ❌ Tunnis ✅

@NirmayprasadYadav Күн бұрын

@arjit-mi7rw ☠️💀 sanatuni

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@Doko_590 Күн бұрын

They are not to be called sanatani Black sheep of sanatan dharma

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@vinodswami4216 Күн бұрын

क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स का तो भाई ज्यादा मै कह नहीं सकता की कितना सच कितना झूठ है पर एक चीन शायद तेरी समझ में कभी भी नहीं आए पर कोशिश करना समझने की । वो बात ये है कि जिस कांशसनेस यानी चेतना की तू बात कर रहा है कि चेतना का क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स से कुछ लेना देना नहीं है और ऑब्जर्वेशन की तू बात कर रहा है तो भाई वास्तव में हर चीज सिर्फ इसकी बात नहीं को ऑब्जर्व करने वाली चेतना ही है । बिना चेतना के कुछ भी ऑब्जर्व किया ही नहीं जा सकता फिर वो वेव है या पार्टिकल क्या ही फर्क पड़ेगा । और जिस के बदबूते पर तू खुद का अस्तित्व मानता है वो शरीर नहीं है वो भी चेतना ही है ।

@skumar8817 Күн бұрын

“Access to the Vedas is the greatest privilege this century may claim over all previous centuries” is a quote by J. Robert Oppenheimer, the physicist who developed the atomic bomb. - J. Robert Oppenheimer , Now who is right J. Robert Oppenheimer or Kshitij ?

@SanjayKumar-nd7wz Күн бұрын

bro this quote is actually said by vivekanand

@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc Күн бұрын

Tunniyon ko sirf gapodna aata hai bas

@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc Күн бұрын

WhatsApp university graduate spooted

@rishabhprasad5417 2 сағат бұрын

Penrose also supports the idea that consciousness is linked to quantum physics( along with hameroff- although with few supporters in the academia) and prominent rationalist youtubers like sabine hossenfelder although expressing scepticism and reservations have opened upto the possibility that their may be truth to this idea. In lieu of Patricia Churchland's and dennetian propositions you have simplify accepted the argument that these ideas constitute pseudscience upfront. I mostly like you bashing religious interpretations and regressive intrusions infecting the public scientific discourse. I would argue you need to engage more with philosophers of science, postmodernist interpretations of science, a little bit of epistemic humility and digging deep into what experts themselves see gives a picture that *most* stuff in quantum physics, science of consciousness is *contested* right to the level of the very foundations .Also, popper's falsifiability criterion although important doesn't permeate everything and is actually questioned by most philosophers of science like sean caroll and Massimo pigilluci with many of them favouring quine's bundle of hypothesis, some following kuhnian ideas among others.

@Roohaaniyat Сағат бұрын

Nice comment brother. But it seems to me that youtuber will not get it 🥲

@huklo6331 Күн бұрын

Schrodinger

@AbcDef-tj3zt Күн бұрын

@Aashif316 Күн бұрын

Bakri

@huklo6331 Күн бұрын

?@@Aashif316

@whykoks 20 сағат бұрын

BINOD

@Currentlysad Күн бұрын

Jai Bhim Bhai

@ankitgrover-r6x Күн бұрын

😊

@ex_SoulLover Күн бұрын

16:51 Andromeda + Milkyway = Milkomeda galaxy 😂😂😂

@randomhooman3236 16 сағат бұрын

akhand milkyway galaxy 🤣🤣

@shwetasinghnm 21 сағат бұрын

Also, Einstein jaise scientist ko quote karke bolna ki inhone kaha hai dekho, to sach hoga is frankly very stupid. Einstein ne zabardasti cosmological constant bhi ghusaya tha apne equations mein because he 'believed' in a self-contained, static universe. Debunk Hyperquest's claim on logical grounds. Do not appeal to authority. Otherwise you are same as him. He says " Vedas say.... " , while you say " Einstein said.....".

@astrokshitij 10 сағат бұрын

Wasn’t the experimental setup explanation and discussion of quantum de coherence was used to do that?

@Roohaaniyat Сағат бұрын

@@astrokshitijNo. Please educate yourself before educating others.

@aniketkoli4282 Күн бұрын

Heisenberg was influenced by conversations with Rabindranath Tagore, where they discussed the metaphysical ideas in Indian philosophy. The philosophical perspectives of interconnectedness and the nature of reality resonated with the emerging principles of quantum mechanics, which Heisenberg helped pioneer. You're claiming vedas are wrong by using vedas what a irony 😂😂

@bodiminds6571 Күн бұрын

Nope , heisenburg pioneered the uncertainty principle in 1927 , and visited Mr Tagore in 1929 , so ur claim that heisenburg got influenced by metaphysical ideas given by Mr Tagore seems inaccurate to me

@aniketkoli4282 Күн бұрын

@@bodiminds6571 Indian philosophy, including ideas rooted in the Vedas, may not have directly influenced Heisenberg's scientific principles, his interaction with Tagore helped him connect the metaphysical aspects of Indian philosophy with his understanding of quantum theory. This meeting reinforced Heisenberg’s view that certain principles in Indian thought aligned with the emerging worldview of quantum physics.

@aniketkoli4282 Күн бұрын

@Darshanik-ved Күн бұрын

Bhayia you can correct me but i think hyper quest is not proving that quantum physics is in sankhaya darshan but showing that conciousness and quantum level mechanisms are similar both changes there property when they are observed and much more conclusion. Yeah may be my interpretation is wrong but using Science to understand some philosophical concept or philosophy to understand science is this good way i think it is beacuse people like Niel bohr also gone through Upanishads to discover new topic that can be aligned with science yeah subject is not same like conciousness and electron in quantum mechanics but there conclusion is what matter. And bhayia why you not try some philosophy like sankhya darshan i think it will give a broader view point.

@Darshanik-ved Күн бұрын

So to sum up that obviously sankhya darshan don't have formulize quantum mechanics but it explains the relation between consciousness and reality just like quantum mechanics EXPLAINS the electron and observer so the point of Hyper quest may be was he is just presenting that similar mindsets were involved in both things and he also confirmed in the video where he replied to expose and roast that he is not claiming science but trying to co relate the conclusions of science with Philosophy and I think great physict like Neil bohr and Erwin Schrodinger also done that with science and Indian philosophy and Upanishads

@mdxparadox6345 Күн бұрын

Can this proves that islam has a critical error ? In islam Allah is a all-knowing entity, as you know that in quran and hadith there are many lines written which can be used in a positive way as well as negative way. And as you know many people used these lines to kill millions. Allah already knew that if he wrote these lines then it leads to misconception and leads to mass killing, then why does he choosed to write in that manner even if he knew the brutal consequences. It actually shows that it actually not written by any higher entity like god , and the remaining writers left are no other than humans.🥳

@yourguyin2554 Күн бұрын

You don't need this to prove islam has critical error. 😂😂😂😂 Ask them for a scriptural evidence of Quran from 7th century. There is none.

@yourguyin2554 Күн бұрын

And btw, this all-knowing entity is not only in Islam but Christianity, Judaism and some hindu philosophies as well

@mdxparadox6345 Күн бұрын

@@yourguyin2554 yeah but in islam , the verses are too much misleading, even now

@kashanrizvi3419 Күн бұрын

Take the pain to quote some verses with examples and effects of misinterpretation leading to loss of life of millions. And as footnote take it. If you think Islam nd rulings are only from Quran then you are naive like 3rd garder trying to teach graduates in science. There is Quran and Hadith and seerah as well. If you say that but Quran has this or that then science also has books at different levels which doens't give clear and full understand of concepts which may lead wrong understanding.

@kashanrizvi3419 Күн бұрын

@@yourguyin2554 A simple youtube search shows we do have proof. The manuscript has been carbon dated to 6th-7th century by University of Birmingham and is held by the same.

@ra-mansteel Күн бұрын

Don't hit directly to grow channel..hit indirectly.

@tafseer_037 10 сағат бұрын

🤡 religion books are book of science Maine bhi logical fallacy padhi hai try harder

@PsychologyNutshelled Күн бұрын

Deepak chopra and HyperQuest are those chai ki dukan wale bahiya jinko jamane bhar ka gyaan pe se hi prapt ho gaya tha.

@Prajjwalaniket524 Күн бұрын

Chup raho astro kshitaj and don't try to become oversmart

@BiplabAditya-k6g 16 сағат бұрын

Kyaa oversmart hai iss video Mai, fool 😂 . Jaali na😂..

@kidsvideos4fun 2 сағат бұрын

Bhai Tera dimag av itna developed ni h jo darshano ko smjh sake 😂😂😂 Tu rehne de... Adhri gagri h tu jo sirf chalakta hai

@rohittekchandani5720 Сағат бұрын

Bhai Tera dimag abhi itna developed nahi hai jo Science ko samajh sake. Tu rehne de. "Naach na jaane aangan teda".

@kidsvideos4fun Сағат бұрын

@rohittekchandani5720 science v padhi h aur dharm v Tu sirf science padha h to chup hi reh

@rohittekchandani5720 54 минут бұрын

@@kidsvideos4funYahi to dikkat hai bhai teri. Tu andhere mein jee raha hai ki tune science padi hai, aur jab tujhe actually mein science padayi jaa rahi hai (jaise is video mein) tu tune bina koyi reason diye use nakar diya. Agar tune science padi hoti to tu actual mein video ke points par counter arguments deta ki vo kyun galat hai. Naaki illogical statements. Hamne bhi dharma pada hai lekin ham teri tarah confirmation bias mein nahin jeete. Jo galat hai usse galat hi bolte hain.

@pankajdwivedi6620 Күн бұрын

अरे तूने तो quantum wave function collapse की सही प्रमाणित interpretation दें दी है जाकर सीधे nobel prize ले, यहां KZbin पर बैठकर क्यों फर्जी ज्ञान पेल रहा है और लोगों को मूर्ख बना रहा है

@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc Күн бұрын

Tere tanatan granthon me sab likha hai toh tunniyon ne aaj tak koi khoj q nhi kiya.

@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc Күн бұрын

Tujhe ye video samjh bhi aaya?? Aisa lagta hai Tune poora video dekhe bina hi comment kar diya.

@pankajdwivedi6620 Күн бұрын

@@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc तू भी कोई नोबेल पुरस्कार विजेता वैज्ञानिक है क्या

@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc Күн бұрын

@@pankajdwivedi6620 tujhe video samjh aayi ki nhi nhi, nasamjh tunni

@pankajdwivedi6620 Күн бұрын

@@AbhishekPatel-wm1cc आजकल You tube पर बहुत से नोबेल पुरस्कार विजेता वैज्ञानिक बैठकर ज्ञान पेल रहे हैं, और तूने कौन सा अविष्कार किया है यह भी बता दे

@Skeptic_arun Күн бұрын

@astrokshitij Vedic Physics: Scientific Origin of Hinduism … Raja Ram Mohan Roy, 1999 Kindly debunk this book.

@darkjoker361 Күн бұрын

Raja Ram Mohan Roy toh 1840 me mar gya?

@Skeptic_arun Күн бұрын

@darkjoker361 wahi to doubt h bhai pr ye book to real h...ab uske ideas se bani ki kisi aur ne likhi wo maine pdha nhi hai.

@darkjoker361 Күн бұрын

@@Skeptic_arun yeah fake hi hoga raja ram mohan roy focused on philosophy and social norms in his life instead of logic

@Skeptic_arun Күн бұрын

@@darkjoker361 haan koi Arya samaji hoga. Recently someone mentioned this book during a discussion/debate/argument, with so much pride.

@semicolon6499 Күн бұрын

shri krishn : consciousness jesa kuch nhi hota sab natural hai

@kashanrizvi3419 Күн бұрын

Explain it further or else read again what you wrote and tell us does it make sense?

@semicolon6499 Күн бұрын

@kashanrizvi3419 हा, हमारे सब निर्णय और क्रिया के पीछे कोई चेतना नहीं है हम तो सब कर्म प्रकृति के गुण से , संयोग से और शरीर के रसायन से चलता है । हमारे विचार दूसरो पे निर्भर करते है , हमारे सब गुण दूसरो से और प्रकृति से संचालित होते है , और हमे ऐसा लगता है सब हम कर रहे है । पर कृष्ण बोलते है ये सब कुछ नहीं है । चेतना जैसा कुछ नहीं है

@rabisiddiqui6127 Күн бұрын

@@semicolon6499han ab jo cheez insane ki aqal se bhahar ha consciousness jiska science bhi pata ni laga payi to ap logo ne uska inkar kardiya gravity ka bhi ni pata how its work ye dekhti kese iska inkar q ni karte conciouseness ek realty ha lekin ye ek Mistry ha how it's work

@vikashpandey9230 Күн бұрын

@@semicolon6499कृष्ण ने कहा कहा की चेतना जैसा कुछ नही होता, उन्होने ये कहा कि अहम कुछ नही होता, यह "I" tendency hoti है, जो अपने आप को कुछ मान बैठती है है या तादात्म्य बना लेती है जिसे फिर conciousnes bol diya जाता, तो esi conciousness तो illusion hai, par अन्ततः to keval pure consciousness hi hoti jo impersonal hoti है,yahi ultimate hai everything whatever appears in the world is superimposed on pure consciousness, which also called aatma or brhman

@semicolon6499 Күн бұрын

@rabisiddiqui6127 आप थोड़ा आंख खोले देखेंगे की तुम जो कर रहे हो वो कहा से आरहा है तो पता चलेगा कि उस केलिए कोई चेतन चीज की जरूरत नहीं है , हम एक मशीन जेसे है , एक सुंदर लड़की दिखी तो अंडर से रसायन का खेल चालू होगया , और एक भद्दी लड़की देखो तो मूड खराब होगया तो बताओ ये कोई चेतना होके का प्रमाण है क्या ? ये तो शरीर गुण और सामाजिक कंडीशंन है । तुम्हरे विचार भी चेतन नहीं है , तुम्हारा दर भी चेतन नही है , सब बाहर से प्रभावित है । ये जो में बोल रहा हु उसे प्रयोग में लाना दिमाग फट जायेगा और समझ में आएगा की चेतना ( consciousness ) जैसा कोई है ही नहीं सब Ai जेसे प्रोग्राम है प्रकृति के द्वारा ।

@Strider5289 Күн бұрын

Dam hai to sudhanshu Trivedi per video banao . Google ka baap🗿🤣🤣❤️

@arjit-mi7rw Күн бұрын

Bro vo to bolta hai ki hindu dharm me pehle se nav grah diye hai par use ye nahi pata ki unhi nav grah me sun,moon bhi hai jo ki science ne planet nahi Mane hai aur rahu, ketu bhi hai jiska ko evidence nahi hai . Spreading pseudoscience only😂😂

@arjit-mi7rw Күн бұрын

Ohm =mc^2 Pseudoscience bhi usi ne spread Kiya Agar ye sahi hai to proof kha hai

@NirmayprasadYadav Күн бұрын

@@Strider5289 11 mulko ke veggayanik darthe hai he usse😅🤡🤡🤡

@DhruvChaudhary-of4qr Күн бұрын

@@NirmayprasadYadavWaah waah 😂😅

@aniketkoli4282 Күн бұрын

@@arjit-mi7rw kiddo grah is not equal to planet Graha means "to seize" or "to influence" in Sanskrit. It refers to celestial bodies or forces that exert an influence on human life and events on Earth. A planet is a celestial body that orbits a star, is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, and has cleared its orbital path of debris. Ek baar google kar lete mandbudhi😑