Phil, would you be willing to do an updated version of this great video?
@StrategyPerformance11 жыл бұрын
Hi Gary. The problem with many academic courses is that you have to demonstrate you learnt the material from the course. Then you have the right to talk about later developments. I made the same mistake ages ago - trying to show i knew more than the curriculum. The art is play the exam game and then apply what you really learnt to your business and real life. Good luck gary.
@inertmosaic222015 күн бұрын
Good presentation skills 🎉
@marlonricardovalientes70624 жыл бұрын
Thanks Phil so explaining BSC in a very clear way. Even those with zero knowledge will be able to easily understand the concept.
@StrategyPerformance9 ай бұрын
You are welcome
@barbaragambrell3049 жыл бұрын
Mr. Jones your explanation of the BSC has made it much easier for me to understand. I am currently on this topic as my capstone before receiving my BSBA. I have been struggling with this topic from the beginning and that is because the school started out teaching the old model. It just does not make much sense. You have brought much more clarity to the whole process. Thank you so much. Now, I will not fail this course.
@Elonmusk52212 жыл бұрын
I'm a final year business student and the lecturer still uses the old balanced scorecard. She is not very approachable and would not take kindly to being told she is 20 years out of date. i have my exams next week and I'm fairly sure this topic will come up, thanks for this easy to follow example. The shocking thing is I done a presentation on Blue Ocean strategy and she marked me down as she did not know what it was even though it is in our prescribed course book?
@lutherpi249 ай бұрын
Thanks Phil Jones, for your excellent presentation. Now i'm able to keep writting my thesis on the right path. Thank you!
@ruthcollantes69019 ай бұрын
Perfectly presented!!! Very clear links between different units of the organization. the process gives meaning to every person's contribution and they know how their performance (or lack thereof) impacts the accomplishment of organizational objectives and its business. Thank you so much! Now I understand why BSC did not appeal to me in its earlier introduction. I am a stickler for strategic planning and BSC just solidified what I have been learning and practicing for the past decades (from MBO to 4Dx and OKR). This version of BSC is comprehensive and simple. My left brain is satisfied. ^_^
@StrategyPerformance9 ай бұрын
Thanks Ruth. So many tried to copy the strategic balanced scorecard, missed the point, adopted simplified versions or simply choose not to read past page 9 of the very first book. I am pleased you found this so useful and clear.
@hachembabahabib90249 жыл бұрын
Thank you M Phil Jones your presentation is excellent and very clear. It's very useful for me.
@JonathanObise5 жыл бұрын
Nice & insightful presentation Phil.
@ericirafasha2886 жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr Jones for the clarification. I am taking the course relating to this video and it has made it clear.
@isofrata9 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation and a very clear explanation. Thank you very much.
@rotormeeeeeeee12 жыл бұрын
Thanks for uploading this video! It's loaded with practical, experience-based knowledge.
@FeezKhalifa6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant and sufficiently understood analysis!
@RomeshKumar4 жыл бұрын
Brilliantly explained ... Kudos
@mrrownel9 жыл бұрын
Great presentation. Clear explanation. Nice build-up.Well done and thank you!
@amsathyadevkidxplorerz48026 жыл бұрын
Being and Indian there is always a flipside of me inclined towards the British people...It is good to think as a Brit...Splendid Cracking the nutshell....Phil(anthrophy) of Knowledge...
@taracarter63610 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for doing this video. I am taking a graduate class that requires me to complete both a strategy map and scorecard. The instructor did not explain it as clearly as you did!
@StrategyPerformance7 жыл бұрын
Thank you Tara, I guess doing it for 20 years in practice helps me explain what is actually going on (as opposed to a theoretical understanding from a book)
@niico797810 жыл бұрын
Very clear presentation, Thanks a lot, spared me much time and confusement.
@thisisek12 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video well done. I guess we still have to do some work if the overall goal is not profitability
@ntehmbebwo85386 жыл бұрын
Outstanding! Helpful in understanding and writing applying bloom taxonomy in analyzing hospitals scorecard
@move4justice12 жыл бұрын
Great video ... very useful for Management accounting student
@rachelwatsky6835 жыл бұрын
Would be great if you could update this presentation
@StrategyPerformance5 жыл бұрын
What do you want as an update? All this is all still valid and many organisations and consultants still make the basic mistakes that I point out here. If you really want more information - visit my website. www.excitant.co.uk where you can read about the overall Fourth Generation Strategic Balanced Scorecard approach.
@stellaadesina44554 жыл бұрын
Thank you Phil. This is very helpful. I got an understanding that will last me a life time.
@StrategyPerformance9 ай бұрын
You are welsome
@SufiM3 жыл бұрын
Your video is spectacular, incredibly helpful and I'm thankful to know this wisdom of yours! Thank you!
@StrategyPerformance9 ай бұрын
Thanks
@openpharmacymolepolole6155 жыл бұрын
very insightful. Thank you
@StrategyPerformance11 жыл бұрын
Hi Ek, if teh overall goal is not profitablity (as in many cases) then there are ways to handle it. See my blog for details, especially in a NFP organisation.
@Nickaayish11 жыл бұрын
I would very much appreciate links to any articles with Phil Jones as author on this subject. I checked google scholar and didnt find anything. This is just great knowledge that I could use in my university papers on strategy. Would it be possible to find any articles anywhere from this author?
@StrategyPerformance7 жыл бұрын
Just go to my website www.excitant.co.uk there are over 300 blog articles there.
@apriantowiwarsono307310 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Phil. Your video is really helpful.
@kennethbeard55537 жыл бұрын
From the number of views this is not the most popular video on the subject but one with better content that actually follows the intended process to develop a BSC. As an experienced practitioner, the strategy map is the most important part of the PROCESS to develop a scorecard. It does need to be SIMPLE (simplified though focus by making tough strategic choices of the vital few CSF's / objectives) but NOT SIMPLISTIC (a picture of categories of measures that are not a cause and effect model). Once this cause and effect relationship diagram is completed, only then should the measures / KPI's be tackled as is said in the book and repeated in this video. If developed correctly the strategy map of integrated objectives will then lead almost automatically to a hierarchy of integrated cascaded measures. I have seen many "BSC" attempts that have been developed without ever considering the strategy map and it is not surprising that they don't survive. The one thing that is not available in the literature is a correlation of strategic objectives that allows the leadership team to assess and evaluate the overall impact of alternative initiatives have on the selected strategy.
@StrategyPerformance7 жыл бұрын
Thank you Kenneth,
@magilassalvacion19773 жыл бұрын
Hi Phil. In my organization, the top part is customer and finance is at the bottom bec we are a government agency... my question is do we really have to have finance on top? By the way... I like you4 explanations. Thank you for sharing.
@StrategyPerformance3 жыл бұрын
You are treating finance as an input. Typical accountants approach :) You have a responsibility for financial outcomes, you just call it surplus, (not profit) so it needs to be at the top ALONGSIDE custpmer (community) and social/environmental impact. (you may have some dvelopmental needs in finance, but that is simply one of many learning and growth capabilities to develop. Go to my website excitant.co.uk and search for public sector or third sector/NFP strategy maps. There is a whole section of my book on these as well.
@StrategyPerformance9 ай бұрын
A three part answer: 1) Having finance at the bottom is a typical accountant's view that the whole organisation is driven by the funds available. Putting leraning and growth at the bottom supports the question - what do we have to do to make this organisaton better by learning and growing new skills, knowledge and cultures. 2) Having finance at teh top dows not make it the ultimate target. The target of the organisation (Process to customer layers) even in the public sector is serving the community. Doing that efficiently is a consequence of the services. So the Financial consequences are not the ultomate target but a consequence of teh pay off between customer/community service and the costs of that setvice. Create surpluses and they are available for re-investment. 3) You better need the three part top layer: 1) Community/Customer - alongside finacial outcome and a third which represents environmental and social impact. See my book "Strategy mapping for learning Organizations£, or my website www.excitant.co.uk/fourth-generation-balanced-scorecard-approach/
@MarthaBegleySchade11 жыл бұрын
Hi Phil, I liked the content of your video so much that I have embedded it on our website on a page about What is strategy? I hope this will get you lots more traffic as it will get me lots of satisfied customers! Thanks for the great explanation! Best wishes Martha business-online-learning
@StrategyPerformance10 жыл бұрын
Thank you Patrick. You can find out more on my website www.excitant.co.uk, Cheers, Phil
@maraddiamandar8 жыл бұрын
sir, i have a question : does the perspective has causality relationship between each others?
@rmolag12 жыл бұрын
well done Phil
@RonHeartt3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful
@Drhhifnawi12 жыл бұрын
The video hangs at 11:40> Please reload it.
@StrategyPerformance11 жыл бұрын
You can find over 200 articles and posts by me, Phil Jones, at my website (see the video description for links)
@ntcuong01ct13 жыл бұрын
Dear Friends, If a company have many strategies: buy another company, build new factory, buy new warehouse, and I want to write it in a strategy map. How will I write?. Thanks.
@StrategyPerformance9 ай бұрын
These sund as if they are multiple strategy maps at different levels. Do not try to put all in one strategy map. Corporate mergers/acquisitions may be at different levels to mangfacturing/warehouse expansion. At the top level - you have growth in two ways. Lower down will be teh detail of the build new factory and buy new warehousing.
@gokcetuncer75687 жыл бұрын
Hi first of all, thank you for this video :) I would like to ask if an objective (process perspective) can directly link to an objective (finance perspective) without linking it to an objective(customer perspective). Thank you :)
@StrategyPerformance7 жыл бұрын
Hi Gocke, yes, you are right and of course they have a different meaning. I may have put in on the video, but (Put simply) there are basically two components to the finance piece - income (from your customers) and costs (from your processes), so yes it is normal (on more detailed strategy maps) to have some links to objectives from customers - "If they are happy they will give you money" and from internal processes "If this is produced more economically, then it saves costs". I hope that makes sense. Have a look in my book as it explains this in much more detail "Strategy Mapping for learning organisations" www.excitant.co.uk/resources/books/book-strategy-mapping/ . There is plenty of other stuff in my blog as well.
@thaihoaindustrialpark10228 жыл бұрын
Great. It is clear.
@tarek.grisha5 жыл бұрын
Thank you. very useful
@anushkawj10 жыл бұрын
Thank you soo much.. Really really helpful
@StrategyPerformance11 жыл бұрын
I suggest you try again Hany, as most people get through to the full almost 20 minutes.
@cherietidwell78215 жыл бұрын
this was excellent
@THEmarch1398 жыл бұрын
can we have our own perspective based on our strategy?
@StrategyPerformance8 жыл бұрын
Hana, I STRONGLY recommend you do NOT introduce a load of perspectives based on your strategy: rather lay your strategy across the perspectives, using the existing perspectives to explain aspects of your strategy. Think of your strategy sitting on top of the perspectives. (The video does say beware of trying to add extra perspectives and losing the underlying cause and effect model) To get more detail I suggest you read my book, "Strategy Mapping for Learning organizations" which explains how to do this in detail. www.excitant.co.uk/resources/books/book-strategy-mapping/ Good luck Phil
@preuValentino7 жыл бұрын
Very useful for me.
@AdelAlTamimi12 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@florianb79589 жыл бұрын
Nice job sir ! :)
@bingliu732611 жыл бұрын
Yes, great video.
@elgenioist12 жыл бұрын
Excelent!
@AdventureIsWorthwhile10 жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@wildatlanticman1282 жыл бұрын
Quite a lot to process here. Excellent content however I do believe the text on screen is distracting, while you are talking - you should either stop at a new slide or simply discuss specifically.