Structures of the Archetypal Realm; How Nothing Becomes Something

[@Formscapes]

Thanks to everyone for watching! Consider supporting me on Patreon; patreon.com/Formscapes?Link&

[@Lesser302]

Finally someone who will understand I hope. If one was to say the nothing is the limitless possibilities of something ❤😢😊 How dose one show the nothing with something that came from an unknown Impossible to date Until now 👍🏽 great job brother Have you seen the inner light of a dice drilled out yet. With a marble and a light one can see a projector or hologram if used and focused right join the dots with in 🎉 Nice video 🥳

[@ready1fire1aim1]

In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's Monad (first emanation of God), from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together with the Strong Nuclear Force: 1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the Strong Nuclear Force. 2) Interconnectedness: In the Monadology, monads are interconnected in a vast network. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together. 3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions. 4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the Strong Nuclear Force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter. 5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz. 6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics. 7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions. em·a·na·tion noun an abstract but perceptible thing that issues or originates from a source.

[@ready1fire1aim1]

Metaphysics Context The monad, the word and the idea, belongs to the Western philosophical tradition and has been used by various authors. Leibniz, who was exceptionally well-read, could not have ignored this, but he did not use it himself until mid-1696 when he was sending for print his New System. Apparently he found with it a convenient way to expound his own philosophy as it was elaborated in this period. What he proposed can be seen as a modification of occasionalism developed by latter-day Cartesians. Leibniz surmised that there are indefinitely many substances individually 'programmed' to act in a predetermined way, each substance being coordinated with all the others. This is the pre-established harmony which solved the mind-body problem, but at the cost of declaring any interaction between substances a mere appearance. Summary The rhetorical strategy adopted by Leibniz in The Monadology is fairly obvious as the text begins with a description of monads (proceeding from simple to complicated instances), then it turns to their principle or creator and finishes by using both to explain the world. (I) As far as Leibniz allows just one type of element in the building of the universe his system is monistic. The unique element has been 'given the general name monad or entelechy' and described as 'a simple substance' (§§1, 19). When Leibniz says that monads are 'simple,' he means that "which is one, has no parts and is therefore indivisible". Relying on the Greek etymology of the word entelechie (§18), Leibniz posits quantitative differences in perfection between monads which leads to a hierarchical ordering. The basic order is three-tiered: (1) entelechies or created monads (§48), (2) souls or entelechies with perception and memory (§19), and (3) spirits or rational souls (§82). Whatever is said about the lower ones (entelechies) is valid for the higher (souls and spirits) but not vice versa. As none of them is without a body (§72), there is a corresponding hierarchy of (1) living beings and animals (2), the latter being either non-reasonable or reasonable. The degree of perfection in each case corresponds to cognitive abilities and only spirits or reasonable animals are able to grasp the ideas of both the world and its creator. Some monads have power over others because they can perceive with greater clarity, but primarily, one monad is said to dominate another if it contains the reasons for the actions of other(s). Leibniz believed that any body, such as the body of an animal or man, has one dominant monad which controls the others within it. This dominant monad is often referred to as the soul. (II) God is also said to be a simple substance (§47) but it is the only one necessary (§§38-9) and without a body attached (§72). Monads perceive others "with varying degrees of clarity, except for God, who perceives all monads with utter clarity". God could take any and all perspectives, knowing of both potentiality and actuality. As well as that God in all his power would know the universe from each of the infinite perspectives at the same time, and so his perspectives-his thoughts-"simply are monads". Creation is a permanent state, thus "[monads] are generated, so to speak, by continual fulgurations of the Divinity" (§47). Any perfection comes from being created while imperfection is a limitation of nature (§42). The monads are unaffected by each other, but each have a unique way of expressing themselves in the universe, in accordance with God's infinite will. (III) Composite substances or matter are "actually sub-divided without end" and have the properties of their infinitesimal parts (§65). A notorious passage (§67) explains that "each portion of matter can be conceived as like a garden full of plants, or like a pond full of fish. But each branch of a plant, each organ of an animal, each drop of its bodily fluids is also a similar garden or a similar pond". There are no interactions between different monads nor between entelechies and their bodies but everything is regulated by the pre-established harmony (§§78-9). Much like how one clock may be in synchronicity with another, but the first clock is not caused by the second (or vice versa), rather they are only keeping the same time because the last person to wind them set them to the same time. So it is with monads; they may seem to cause each other, but rather they are, in a sense, "wound" by God's pre-established harmony, and thus appear to be in synchronicity. Leibniz concludes that "if we could understand the order of the universe well enough, we would find that it surpasses all the wishes of the wisest people, and that it is impossible to make it better than it is-not merely in respect of the whole in general, but also in respect of ourselves in particular" (§90). In his day, atoms were proposed to be the smallest division of matter. Within Leibniz's theory, however, substances are not technically real, so monads are not the smallest part of matter, rather they are the only things which are, in fact, real. To Leibniz, space and time were an illusion, and likewise substance itself. The only things that could be called real were utterly simple beings of psychic activity "endowed with perception and appetite." The other objects, which we call matter, are merely phenomena of these simple perceivers. "Leibniz says, 'I don't really eliminate body, but reduce [revoco] it to what it is. For I show that corporeal mass [massa], which is thought to have something over and above simple substances, is not a substance, but a phenomenon resulting from simple substances, which alone have unity and absolute reality.' (G II 275/AG 181)" Leibniz's philosophy is sometimes called "'panpsychic idealism' because these substances are psychic rather than material". That is to say, they are mind-like substances, not possessing spatial reality. "In other words, in the Leibnizian monadology, simple substances are mind-like entities that do not, strictly speaking, exist in space but that represent the universe from a unique perspective." It is the harmony between the perceptions of the monads which creates what we call substances, but that does not mean the substances are real in and of themselves. (IV) Leibniz uses his theory of Monads to support his argument that we live in the best of all possible worlds. He uses his basis of perception but not interaction among monads to explain that all monads must draw their essence from one ultimate monad. He then claims that this ultimate monad would be God because a monad is a “simple substance” and God is simplest of all substances, He cannot be broken down any further. This means that all monads perceive “with varying degrees of perception, except for God, who perceives all monads with utter clarity”. This superior perception of God then would apply in much the same way that he says a dominant monad controls our soul, all other monads associated with it would, essentially, shade themselves towards Him. With all monads being created by the ultimate monad and shading themselves in the image of this ultimate monad, Leibniz argues that it would be impossible to conceive of a more perfect world because all things in the world are created by and imitating the best possible monad.

[@ready1fire1aim1]

[2D is not the center of the universe, 0D is the center of the mirror universe]: The mirror universe theory is based on the concept of parity violation, which was discovered in the 1950s. Parity violation refers to the observation that certain processes in particle physics don't behave the same way when their coordinates are reversed. This discovery led to the idea that there might be a mirror image of our universe where particles and their properties are flipped. In this mirror universe, the fundamental particles that make up matter, such as electrons, protons, and neutrinos, would have their charges reversed. For example, in our universe, electrons have a negative charge, but in the mirror universe, they might have a positive charge. Furthermore, another aspect of the mirror universe theory involves chirality, which refers to the property of particles behaving differently from their mirror images. In our universe, particles have a certain handedness or chirality, but in the mirror universe, this chirality could be reversed. Leibniz or Newton: Quantum mechanics is more compatible with Leibniz's relational view of the universe than Newton's absolute view of the universe. In Newton's absolute view, space and time are absolute and independent entities that exist on their own, independent of the objects and events that take place within them. This view implies that there is a privileged observer who can observe the universe from a neutral and objective perspective. On the other hand, Leibniz's relational view holds that space and time are not absolute, but are instead relational concepts that are defined by the relationships between objects and events in the universe. This view implies that there is no privileged observer and that observations are always made from a particular point of view. Quantum mechanics is more compatible with the relational view because it emphasizes the role of observers and the context of measurement in determining the properties of particles. In quantum mechanics, the properties of particles are not absolute, but are instead defined by their relationships with other particles and the measuring apparatus. This means that observations are always made from a particular point of view and that there is no neutral and objective perspective. Overall, quantum mechanics suggests that the universe is fundamentally relational rather than absolute, and is therefore more compatible with Leibniz's relational view than Newton's absolute view. What are the two kinds of truth according to Leibniz? There are two kinds of truths, those of reasoning and those of fact. Truths of fact are contingent and their opposite is possible. Truths of reasoning are necessary and their opposite is impossible. What is the difference between Newton and Leibniz calculus? Newton's calculus is about functions. Leibniz's calculus is about relations defined by constraints. In Newton's calculus, there is (what would now be called) a limit built into every operation. In Leibniz's calculus, the limit is a separate operation. What are the arguments against Leibniz? Critics of Leibniz argue that the world contains an amount of suffering too great to permit belief in philosophical optimism. The claim that we live in the best of all possible worlds drew scorn most notably from Voltaire, who lampooned it in his comic novella Candide.

[@jmp01a24]

Lion of Light, I came to man to enlighten. Bring the Sun to the hearts of mankind.

[@claironaut]

You must be the Gandalf of this world. I've never found such a concise and clear understanding of mystics and psychology like in your videos. You're describing what's incredibly hard to describe. Thank you for your work

[@Formscapes]

Thank you so much! Unfortunately I don't have any wizard-powers yet, but I'm working on it! lol

[@meowluminals2557]

@@Formscapes working on it? Can we manifest wizard powers as we r limitless?

[@Formscapes]

@@meowluminals2557 only one way to find out; gotta learn the arcane secrets of the universe!

[@Meta-trope]

I'm particularly skeptical of Any information I interact with, even though I entertain the transmitted thoughts without any compulsion to accept them. However, I second this comment and add that it is an exquisite pleasure to connect with the videos on this channel due to various mentioned and unmentioned attributes. I find time windows when I can fully delve in listening them. The producer of them has my respect and gratitude.

[@zilianthegreat]

you're the first person I've seen put into words the things I've been thinking about lately I often think in terms of possibility spaces, where I am able with my capabilities, to sculpt this space into anything I can imagine. When I play the piano, I think about the entire space of possiblities the keys and pedals can represent, and then I sculpt this space through rhythm, chord changes, melodies, and dynamics into a specific song. I've applied this way of thinking to many skills I've learned throughout the years, and it always helps me conceptualize from the ground up what kind of space it is I'm actually dealing with.

[@starxcrossed]

I love your blank canvas analogy. I often use black canvas to start a painting. All the shadows are already there, all I need to do is add the light. It really can be anything Everything and nothing are the same thing. That is profound.

[@Formscapes]

You ever get completely overwhelmed by the blankness? Like you stare at it for a minute trying to figure out what you want to make and then it slowly dawns on you that it could be ***anything*** and then you start to feel like changing that pristine, pure possibility is a way too big of a task for anyone... I get that sometimes when I'm trying to make music and I find myself just staring at a blank MIDI clip, completely paralyzed lol

[@starxcrossed]

@@Formscapes YES like… I can paint ANYTHING? And I can’t turn off the tap once it’s open, then the possibilities paralyze me so if I get started I better finish as fast as possible because the ideas are still coming and god knows I will move on faster than I can keep my attention. That’s the allure of midjourney however I am lately realizing it’s not a total cure 😂 I find that actually making money off art is the only practical way to get a thing done

[@Formscapes]

@@starxcrossed Having a deadline definitely teaches you how to just shut off your brain and do the dam thing. I used to very rarely write bc of this but then I got a job writing essays for college kids for a living (which was literally my full-time job for like 6 months lol). Then when there was money on the line, I suddenly found it pretty easy to bang out 20-30 pages every week. Funny how that works lmfao

[@starxcrossed]

@@Formscapes something you said gave me one of those lightbulb feelings… like it means something to be ultimately grounded in what life wants. One could be limitlessly creative but unless it comes to material fruition or expression it’s *almost* meaningless. Life wants to live, imagination wants to imagine, but life has the ultimate say in what you have to do. I always go back to origin of life. What do you make of the metabolism first theory ?

[@Formscapes]

I suspect the metabolism first theory is probably true in essence, but simply because the Cosmos is fundamentally metabolic by default anyway. I feel like the origin of life remains mysterious bc we still don't really understand the real history of the earth, and in particular how the "laws" which govern electrical/chemical processes may have themselves evolved over time. We assume that the same processes at work now were operative billions of years ago, but there is really no reason whatsoever to believe that to actually be the case.

[@leodalionful]

By the way, thank you for having a mind that has the capacity to inquire about large topics and not killing it by thinking like a robot. It’s refreshing and not something I come across often. :’)

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@leodalionful]

You’re welcome! I believe I have deeply understood much of this in past lives, as its so familiar. I feel at home listening to it. 🥰

[@жизненный_опыт]

lmao@@leodalionful

[@riqo4877]

Yo! THIS HAS DESTROYED MY PROCRASTINATION. This is a classic…like it’s a masterpiece I swear. Does anyone realize how much POWER is within this video? This is profound and I’m here for it.

[@Formscapes]

Hahaha thank you so much. Glad you Liked it!

[@murderedsun7367]

You made it happen to where you watched the video, and created a reality sequencing in your own subconscious to remind yourself of your own power. You did this my friend, this is your dream...

[@JaeLenMitchell]

i have been searching, i shall tune in

[@SuicideApple-wm6et]

Destroyed your procrastination? Do you mean that all your procrastination was because you unconsciously wanted to understand what is going on but this video gave it all to you

[@Elsie144k]

I’m about 48 minutes in. This video is like a master class. So grateful for this incredible synthesis of information. It’s helping me a great deal to make sense of my trauma and my life’s journey. Regarding trauma- an Aha! Moment for me during this video was when I realized that I probably have some work to do around the warrior archetype. The confirmation came when I realized that my Chiron is in Aries in the 4th house along with Mars ! And Mars is the Warrior! The wound of Chiron in Aries 4th is Anger- both being the Victim of anger and succumbing to anger as a default emotion. I feel like my Chiron is the wounded warrior who couldn’t protect herself, vs the wounded healer. I hope this revelation is helpful to someone else. Would love to know if anyone else’s archetype and Chiron match up

[@occultst921]

WOW! This is extremely profound! I have been wanting to express these ideas in someway for a while now and you’ve done it perfectly. The level of detail and depth is astonishing. This is seriously the best content on the site!

[@etruscanetwork]

No, mom, I'm not doing drugs, I'm watching a very well made video about how nothing becomes something

[@444ui]

Your intro is one of a kind. It's hypnotizing.

[@DavidVega-wi5pr]

It's people like YOU who should be flooding KZbin with your idea and concepts of higher wisdom seriously

[@Bunny01879]

If i could identify with any past archetype, it would be the turth seeker. Lately these ideas have, to put lightly, breathed life into my soulless mind. As if all my searching and attempting was for me to find these pieces of modern and ancient synthesis. Thank you for being someone who feels for the truth beneath the facts. I dont think i had any effort left to give once i stumbled on my knees at this door. I couldn't even reach out to knock. Yet others have already thrown this potential open for me. Again, thank you for helping my efforts regaining mental vigor again. I feel child-like and i can finally see the wind in my sails

[@Formscapes]

Follow the white rabbit. Don't look back. It goes far, far deeper than what I've been able to give voice to thus far.

[@starxcrossed]

My daughter used to like meditation music to fall asleep to, now she likes Formscapes and I’m not mad about it 😅

[@Formscapes]

That is beyond adorable lol 💙💙💙💙💙💙

[@Charlie-Em]

God bless her

[@ketoonkratom]

God Bless

[@loki-uw6tg]

I can make you fat

[@nirvanacrown6516]

So cool! Good on her❤️. How about you?

[@Noelciaaa]

I'm about halfway through and I must say... WOW.... I already know your videos are excellent, the subject matter very informative and enriching, with a deep and holistic understanding from you creating a very immersive and helpful presentation. But this one is something even more... it feels like the best therapy ever. Usually I enjoy the intellectual satisfaction but this feels like it's genuinely helped me emotionally... I've been going through a genuinely very difficult time in life that I was already aware also has a potential to be deeply and positively transformative if I play into it right and keep going down the right path of confronting these things. But it still felt so scary and I felt so lost without having much guidance in the form of a conceptual framework that can give me insight on the whole of the experience. But this is it... I can see where I am right now and why it feels like the darkest chapter is approaching... and so it gives reassurance to know how the whole process works and the different strengths i gain by going through this cycle. As well as confirming my suspicion that at current moment gathering allies and knowing my adversaries well is key. I'm a pretty solitary person, so it is a genuine struggle but lately somehow it's coming more naturally and seems like pushing through apprehension is the way to go.

[@Formscapes]

For the record, the path that lead me to my current cosmography began during one of the most utterly bleak periods of my life - I was a homeless, raging alcoholic. My parents and grandparents had all passed away within a span of about 3 years. I had just gone through a very, very messy breakup. My car got repossessed lol. Literally the entire ground of my life had completely disintegrated, and getting out of the oblivion I had fallen into took the better part of 4 years.

[@Noelciaaa]

@@Formscapes Oh wow, yeah, that does sound like a true very long dark night to pass through. It's so inspiring though that you've managed to get out of it and use the newfound strength to reach a state in which you can be the one shining a light that others can use to navigate out of their darkness. Definitely so wonderful.

[@sibntw]

I've watched this video 3 times now, it is only right I join the channel! Thank you for this content, it is thought provoking and enriching without the doom and gloom

[@Formscapes]

Welcome aboard! Glad to have you here!

[@dddono]

Making art is like talking and using words to come to an understanding. Your understanding of the individual words is subjective, but the pattern of words used to get to the idea funnels your subjectivity closer to an objective area. So all the paint strokes do the same thing but for understanding the picture. So while the viewer is the last element in the art piece, the art itself is self referential with your understanding in a way where you have the capacity to "fully understand" what the artist intended simply because you're viewing the art similar to how we have the capacity to fully understand what we say to each other while not guaranteeing that we do. I think :P Symbolic vs Pictorial communication.

[@HamletsMill1969]

When our perception is tested, we are in a state of mental duality and we are thrilled for all we gain in knowledge but we also cry as we grieve for our loss of who we used to be and let it go. Shakespeare asked, “To be or not to be?” It’s a choosing of becoming new, like a new growing inside us. We decide everyday how far we grow.

[@melancholia34]

It's been 9 months since my experienced oneness/pure electric blue energy. letting go of the self after realizing the ultimate nature of our shared identity feels like killing a child. now I realize it's more an evolution into a new archrtype of human identity

[@IntelligentFoool]

Only 10 minutes in and im always glad to find like minded people, but wow I didnt expect this video to be so good. Honestly amazing work. I have always found it somewhat difficult to put a lot of these concepts into words so its refreshing to hear them from someone else. Thank you

[@leifbeyond]

I watched for the archetypes to better my understanding of how they influence holotropic breathwork. I was a pleasantly surprise that you went there and beyond with Tarnas and Groff. 🙏✨⚡️🔑

[@Formscapes]

Holotropic breathwork is something I need to do more. I've really only done it once, but it was super intense. It definitely has a profound impact on one's awareness.

[@dabrupro]

Always appreciate your work. Thank you. "To expound and propogate concepts is simple, to drop all concepts is difficult and rare." -- Nisargadatta Maharaj, I Am That

[@pluvio7208]

First minutes I thought it was Terrence McKenna talking :) Damn I have real problems with understanding complex things, kind of dyslexia of thinking. Thank you a lot, my fellow human friend, for your precious time, for dissecting those incomprehensible concepts that digestibly and so so so poetically. It was not only informative but so beautiful, I cried a lot. I feel I’m not alone when I stumble upon such masterpieces. You have a talent of a teacher, of a master. Thank you

[@Formscapes]

Thank you! Glad you liked it

[@paradigmshift3879]

Secrets in our DNA = 185 = 5, English, In Chaldean = 56 = (11) Archetypography = 186 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 56 = (11) Projected reality = 186 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 56 = (11)

[@rujanalexandrabeatrice1339]

Thats not dyslexia of mind But your mind isn’t acknowledged with this information so you need to give it more reading on the subject! Mind is used on a frequency witch ain’t used to the information presented! Happened to me with the bible,couldn’t understand anything first time I’ve read,started to make sense only years after when probably my mind “grew up”?!😂😅😂

[@SkullyTheHypnoSkull]

It's better than a Terrence McKenna A.I.

[@chickenbiscuitbabyyewww9580]

You can definitely tell the speaker was heavily influenced by Terrence right dow to the pauses and ways they pronounce words, but I’m not mad about it! Terrence is one of the greatest minds of all time

[@MattieGRRRL]

I was very pleasantly surprised to see an image of Ananse the spider included in your explanation of Uranus, very well done! You have condensed an immense amount of information into this video!

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@dallaslove-n3b]

HANDS DOWN…. Best video I’ve come across thus far. Thank you so much!

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@tazzyel]

Read Grof’s work a few years ago on the perinatal matrices and found it so fascinating… the way you just integrated it from me blew my mind lmao. It’s all starting to become clearer now

[@Formscapes]

Thanks!

[@demiandelossantos6268]

Same ❤

[@astergirma1968]

I am thankful for your work that is elegantly done and help me to grow in my journey. I have been noticing after experiencing stillness within me, something emerges from the void infinite possibility & then the body/mind achieve joy , love - exuberant. Thank you for sharing.

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@BeatdownBabylon]

I found when I need it. This information was beyond valuable, I'd say it is imperitive, to understanding the current quest I find myself cycling through. Having the necessary effect today of reinforcing the deep, primal understanding of the self masked by projections, tainted with the doubts cast forth by this earthly realm of wild, beautiful interesting and dangerous material. Thank you from the bottom of my heart :)

[@Formscapes]

Thank you so much! All of our journeys weave together and I'm glad to see that my work has brought our threads into contact

[@BeatdownBabylon]

@@FormscapesThreads weaving together; I certainly think so as well! Threads for the win! That whole string theory was always a hard sell for me 😂

[@Formscapes]

@@BeatdownBabylon Yeah string theory was a pyramid scheme unfortunately but the metaphors are still just as useful as they were before String theory was cooked up lol

[@BeatdownBabylon]

@@FormscapesWe see through the same veils on this topic 100% :)

[@Stuugie.]

Gonna watch later, always excited for a new video though

[@Formscapes]

😎👉👉

[@KoalaProductions]

did you ever watch it

[@AshrafMoTacky]

What an amazingly perceptive and informative passing of priceless knowledge. My choice of words are an understatement about the value of this knowledge.

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@FreemindTv11]

I’ve watched this at least 5 times now and I still have bearly scratched the surface in understanding it. I love it. Good content

[@emanuelpetre5491]

Probably your best yet. Really impressive stuff

[@Formscapes]

😎👉👉

[@thenobody_]

Agreed and that's saying a lot given the quality of the rest of the channel's content.

[@liz-lk2wx]

Phenomenal work man, I appreciate how easy you make it to learn!

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@davieboy3814]

I’m working my way through all your videos so I can have the proper foundation. I keep getting sidetracked by doing homework on the various ideas and thinkers you feature.

[@CGMaat]

Wish we could have had these lecture in our education - mind expanding. Great presentation- thank you.

[@Formscapes]

Thanks fam

[@WaterholeExchange]

Thanks for sharing, great work. I am grateful and blessed to have watched this information.

[@liamgkelly]

Damn that's crazy like two years ago, I charted out planetary archetypes practically identical to how you are presenting them. Great presentation man!

[@bloomfusion]

Well done! 👏 Some of my favorite topics, but with some new and original insights!

[@Formscapes]

Thanks, fam 😎

[@metatypology]

intriguing synthesis of frameworks. i too see the planetary archetypes as fundamental axioms of meaning and appreciate the sources you bring in to explicate it

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@redmoonrevivalastrology2020]

As an Archetypal Astrologer, I simply love your channel and all that you explore. Thank you

[@Fullmetaltracer]

Thank you for taking the time give us new ways to look at the same old topics. I love coming to youtube challenge my belief system these patterns are everywhere.

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@demiandelossantos6268]

Thank you so much for your time, exposing incredible piece of wisdom/art. Got me on insight tears!! Cosmic love for the mind behind Formscapes ❤ and boundless gratitude ! 🙏

[@BrianNarron]

Mathematically, the summation of infinity, or adding all possible numbers, equals zero, because any possible number has a symmetrical negation. So, in a sense zero can be viewed as the union of all numbers and any other number can be viewed as a breaking of the symmetry of zero ( 0 - [-1] = 1 or one is zero minus negative one or one is the union of all numbers except negative one). I have been wondering if the question, how do you get something from nothing, is in fact as nonsensical as, what happened before time. What if the answer is ,why do you think there can be nothing, what is generally called "nothing" is everything. Thank you for this channel it is refreshing.

[@mopycbaby811]

I've only gotten to half the video and felt compelled to comment. Amazing work. I have subbed to your channel.

[@amanitamuscaria7500]

That was very interesting. A cut above. thank you.

[@Formscapes]

Glad you liked it!

[@JN-pc8qq]

An interesting take. Thank you. Some of your correspondences are off and contradict years of contemplation by many others who are in agreement about their traditional designations. Metaphysics and the philosophy that emerges from its interpretation are subjective, however, and you have brought light and beneficial insights to these ideas. Thanks again.

[@katelambros2454]

May all those involved be covered in safety and protection for in their efforts to save another they knowingly put themselves at risk - this is what a global sense of kinship looks like, the highest form of Love we can bring into this World 💜🕊️💜

[@bettysue8671]

Yes! Especially the AI experts

[@michaelschuetz8890]

Wow, I love the way you articulate complex and important thoughts. I think that healing can emerge through articulation. I would suppose that that is one of your underlying themes. It is working for me, in any event, as I'm the type of guy to blast off to Neptune or Pluto, on occasion, then always returns to earth, wondering what happened. Your analysis brings to light some of what happens. What I derive from such explication is that what is needed is confrontation rather than shame. And with this I can deal. You, my friend, are a healer.

[@Footnotes2Plato]

amazing. so glad to see this go viral.

[@Formscapes]

This whole thing is also inundated with your influence if that wasn't abundantly clear lol

[@jeffxanders3990]

In the dream of life, nothing is everything and everything is nothing.

[@Vshamann336]

This was pretty good man. Glad I found you. Thank you

[@Formscapes]

Glad to hear it!

[@NotIT777]

Wow! You got it. Subscribed and ready for more. Great work here!

[@Formscapes]

thank you!

[@stephenprentiss4421]

Checked earlier no video just checked back and 😊one of best channels

[@Formscapes]

😎👉👉

[@heraclitus_o]

What a great subject. This is perhaps the single favorite question of my meager mind for now. I imagine an infinite variety of forms that we call "non-existence", merely because we are blind to their possibility from our particular flavor of "existence." The infinite varieties of Non-existence are truly and literally inconceivable to us. Hence, their "non-existence" more about seman tic tautologies than ontology.

[@TheArchetypalist]

I love this video. What not many seem to know or remember is that reality itself it encoded within the archetypes, and I mean that which people so generously ridicule nowadays, the Tarot. It has been abused and misused in the new age but was the guiding force in Ancient Egypt to walk the path of Enlightenment, the path of purification and ascension. Once you open up to archetypal numerology, you see the blueprint of the Earth interconnected with the blueprint of the human form and they CAN only ever ascend together. Each planet has a main species it is entangled with, inseparably. The blood alchemy and how to do it is encoded within the archetypal numerology, each archetype of the 21 that are shown in this realm contains an initiation spectrum to refine and develop one's level of consciousness and blood alchemize oneself into a higher expression of the human body form/blueprint. Two vital archetypes have been suppressed and even deactivated in this realm for a long time, the archetype 22, one of purification and ascendion (or descension and materialism) and the archetype 23, which is Unity spectrum consciousness, the lifting of the veil itself, basically embodying Christ/Solar Consciousness. And from there on, the archetypes progress into refinement and into the higher realms, spiritualizing back "up". Each archetype holds the initiations and spectrum key codes for the blueprint to activate further and for the alchemical process to commence and finalize on its given level. Not only the planets initiate, the archetypal forces are encoded in reality itself (you can calculate each archetypal DAY initation plus your unique blueprint initiation that interconnects with it to see what lessons you are supposed to learn), and the Archetypes themselves came from Source which went through the archetype process first. Not many know this. Source/God went through the archetypal initiation. That is also encoded in the archetypes. It is a code language, the archetypes are an energy language that if you remember how to read, you hear the Song of Creation itself.

[@Allyourheroswenttohell]

You don't understand anything about their science. Human beings aren't more important than any insect. We are the planets and stars and they are us. The cosmos is a reflection of everything that is. What is a main species? The Egyptian royals would have had no clue what you're talking about.

[@leodalionful]

I’ve had these exact same realizations you are talking about. Glad to see I’m tuned in. 😉

[@mithras666]

This channel is a gem. Thank you for not falling for the simplistic hippie-style "vibrations and frequency" type of philosophy most Gen Z thinkers seem to go for. I have subscribed and will definitely be watching your videos from now on

[@Formscapes]

Thank you! There's alot more where that came from

[@nianatura]

What? Do you just not like the terms vibration and frequency lol?

[@kartoshka253]

@@nianatura I have distaste for hippie philosophy like that because of looking at people who preach it, but it does make sense

[@tjcarney6776]

Wow, that was an immensely well done cohesion of ideas

[@kevinhowe3280]

I freaking love this video. I've watched it 3 times now lol

[@Formscapes]

Well you're gonna love the sequel if I can ever get the editing done for the dam thing lol

[@kevinhowe3280]

@@Formscapes can't wait. I've never seen th planets and archetypes described so well. I can't remember which doctor whitehead I think was his name, he repeated pretty much th conclusions I had come to on my own. Through diffrent experiences I had, it just became clear to me that all creatures arise from this same force and sound or csyonics is th key to understanding nature. It was amazing to hear things that were already in my head repeated so elegantly.

[@OregonTransfer]

It's refreshing to listen to someone who understands that, in order to understand existence we have to understand ourselves. It's hard to put this into words but I think most try to separate human existence from the rest of existence when in actuality they have a deep relationship with one another (or rather that human existence has a deep relationship with the rest of existence). I guess it seems "too good to be true", that we can understand reality through the lens of our own existence - probably because of scientific progression that removes human biases out of the equation when it comes to understanding existence in a practical way (not knocking science obviously, lol). But it's all self-evident in a very subtle way, it's corny to say but "we are the universe experiencing itself". Apologies if my comment came across as misinterpreting you. I found a lot of things said in your video relatable and sensible to the things I've come to find on my own "spiritual journey", even if I can't understand it fully since I'm not really familiar with mysticism, jungian thinking, etc.

[@Formscapes]

Kant asked "What must our consciousness be like in order that the world should appear to us as it does" Schelling asked; "What must the world be like such that it could condition the possibility of our consciousness"

[@NeroKaligula]

I know this sounds condescending but understand yourself more by reading a chemistry book and after that biology, physics and so on infinitely more valuable than this random mental masturbation of fairy tales, machine gun of roughly associated terms and correlations that sadly you can spin in another 5 hundred directions and with a confident tone would sound just as profound

[@OregonTransfer]

@@NeroKaligula You're not wrong or invalid about understanding oneself more through those sciences, but I think you've missed the point entirely. This video in question touches on a lot of ontology, as well as deeper aspects of the human mind that are still obscure to science right now and may very well be forever because of the nature of these questions. These questions are not spurring you on to buy crystals to heal your "inner chakras" or whatever. It's more genuine than you think. In essence the question is "why, how and what are we the way we are". Understanding ourselves and the "human situation" can only start with self exploration and these questions. Meditating on this, figuratively or literally, is how you gain a holistic perspective independent of human biases. It is the same objective as science, just at times counter-intuitive and sadly easily spun into pseudoscience. You have to remove the human element to understand the human element.

[@OtisSchmakel]

@@NeroKaligula a bit heavy-handed but Spot On... the kid did a great job tho - this can save a lot of people a great deal of time things that save a lot of time are very useful - and folks can get back to bookin' : Biology, Chemistry, Physics etc.

[@2013Arcturus]

So when I first found your channel a couple of months ago, I had literally just watched a video by Jeffery Kaplan called "Russels Paradox- a simple explanation of a profound problem." In it he explains that set theory has a paradox at its core that's equivalent to "this sentence isn't true." It can't be defined away, and it's axiomatic. There is another such paradox in logic. It got me thinking about paradoxes, what if we misunderstand what they're telling us, and the term _"infinite unstable recursion"_ came into my mind. Basically, paradoxes are axiomatic to existence, and it's the infinite, instaneous fluctuations between polar impossibilities that is the structure of "is." There is no dynamism without the universe being incapable of coming to a permanent stability or rest. Without that instability we would have "infinite stable recursion" and maybe this what entropy is. Now I'm just spit balling. But anyway I've had that bottled up a couple months, and was just thinking about your channel today and you post a video exactly on a topic I could comment my paradox idea on. Love synchronicity.

[@Formscapes]

I think you're definitely on the right track. These strange self-referential paradoxes, loops and asymmetries pop up everywhere. It's like there is this "friction" within the realm of pure form itself which then allows pure possibility to become actuality by negating itself. It's a very Hegelian idea. There's something similar in music as well; lots of these "quirks" which prevent theoretical structures in music from ever being perfectly geometric. Again, these seem to imply that even at the most perfect resting states we can imagine, there is still a "tension" which drives metamorphosis.

[@2013Arcturus]

@@Formscapes Yes, tension seems to be an underlying motif of the whole cosmic symphony. Another example of the "tension between the possible and impossible is of course _i,_ a number which can't be properly logically defined and yet is essential to all complexity, buried right there in the heart of the fractal equations. The square root of negative 1 made me fail sophomore math cause I checked out when my math teacher couldn't explain "imaginary" numbers, I felt a little insulted and my 15 year old self spent class writing poetry. I was such a little asshole lmao, but I've never dropped my resentment for the _term_ "imaginary number" cause it feels like it blockades us for getting at the truth of what _i_ must be. Same as the term paradox which inherently implies some level of "this can't be true, CAUSE it's a paradox," instead of trying to see them as something more fundamental.

[@CariMachet]

Absolutely love synchronicity and scream “synchronicity” when it happens often like screaming a cheer yay yay yay!!!

[@Formscapes]

I should do a video on Synchronicity but I wanna wait till I have more subs so that I can ask people for personal stories 🤔

[@ianharrison5758]

I had a near death experience in 2018 and after my heart stopped I “experienced” oblivion. It wasn’t an experience as much as it was a transition of awareness after the fact. I don’t “remember” what I experienced but I know what nothing “looks” like. To this day I can’t describe it, or how I retained any awareness of the experience, but best way ig is to imagine how it feels to lucid dream, or be between consciousness and complete unconsciousness. You know how you can wake up with a vague impression of the thoughts you had but can’t ever recall them in a way you can voice to others? It’s like I “remembered” the experience bc it stayed on the tip of my tongue and that’s where it’s been ever since. The experience itself is even harder to describe bc by the nature of what I’m trying to describe, doing that at all means I’m not describing what I experienced. Imagine seeing the reflection of your shadow without a mirror. That’s the best I got for how mind fucking the experience was. I saw the unseeable without the means to do so and I’m ngl the fact I can even have that kind of experience trips me out regardless of why

[@Formscapes]

You should check out Chris Carter's book on NDEs. It's a very thorough breakdown of the literature on the subject with alot of good stories.

[@ianharrison5758]

@@Formscapes what is an NDE?

[@Formscapes]

@@ianharrison5758 "Near Death Experience"

[@Art.Official.Musiqk]

You really channeled a level of akashic genius in this video! I don't know if you actually realize what you are tapping into with this line of meditation and reflection, but i must insist that you please spend more time meditating on all of this and then on ways to relate it to people in the Simplist way possible! Humanity needs these teachings true meanings explained to them right now! It is much more serious than most people realize that we get these teachings embedded into the collective consciousness! This may sound crazy but I can assure you all with great authority that humanity is at a crossroads right now! We have been here before, however it has not been recorded in our mainstream history. So far everytime we have gotten to this point we have destroyed ourselves and sent ourselves back to the "stone age"... We have the opportunity to "accend" to a higher level of "consciousness" or spirituality in a form where we with our minds are capable of everything that science is attempting with technology! I know that sounds like insanity and stupidity to most, i understand. I would ask that you meditate on "has humanity been at this point before" not what happened or anything negative, just have we been here before in a collective consciousness manner. I suggest that you will be shocked at the answer your intuition gives you! Don't let the "rational mind" destroy that knowing that comes from the intuition of that meditation. Of course the mind will say its none sense, because the mind had been programmed since birth with a mental download designed to keep us from believing our intuition! It is not our fault and the people that scoof at those of us that know this stuff, it is not their fault that they are that way so have empathy and compassion towards them even when they persecute you... BACK TO THE MAIN POINT FOR THE CONTENT CREATOR, you are taping into something huge and humanity desperately needs this video explained much much deeper with correlations that connect to everything in their daily psych and behavior and shows the behavior of the collective and what sepiroth they are operating from! This is a lives work right here! Books and books can be written on this! We need to bring all the secret teachings together in one simple to understand system! Once we do that it will be easy to prove the correlations to the system/map and where a persons consciousness and behavior is at on the map! Its very hard to explain this in a text message, but i know that if you read this and meditate on what i am saying you will see the truth in it and find the urgency in getting this new refined teaching out to the collective! Stay away from teaching about the "magic" and all that you will uncover on this journey, the collective is not ready for that, except the "magic" of healing oneself and others. Just make a simple to be understood "map" to show everyone where they are and where they can go! If we don't get the majority of the collective to rise above the current division that is being forced on us we will destroy ourselves again! You have a gift! Idk if you know it or not, but you do, and with that gift comes a karmic responsibility to help humanity at this crucial moment we are in! Im doing my part everyday the best i can and this is one of the ways i help is to tell people that are more talented than me that they are more talented than they even realize! You have a lifes work here with this video as the premise! It is fun to you to do this anyways, you like it because it is your calling! We all need to teach the collective its actual power! Right now we are using that power to destroy ourselves (again) and 90% don't have a clue they are doing it, while the 1% have already made their underground cities to survive and emerge on the surface in say 100-200 years as gods over the primitive humans that survive and boom we are right back to where we started! We must break this cycle! The power is with us, but we don't know it at all and we are using it to destroy ourselves! We have to teach people how the mind really works and how reality really works and fast! Otherwise we will be reincarnating into a new stoneage wasteland with these same families having all the knowledge and power with technology to make us think they are actual god's and worship them for thousands of years until we get to the point we are now and they decide to influence us to destroy ourselves again! This had happened to many times! So i implore you to tap into that intuition you have about this video and follow thru with bringing all the teachings together into a simple easy and almost undeniable truth about the mind and its powers! We can create something so much better if we all just knew that we are the ones creating this with our belief and intentions! Anyways i know i wrote a book and chances are you won't see this because this video is to old, but im just doing my part... Either way im not scared, we have all of eternity to figure it out so humanity will ascend eventually... Well... Unless we completely and literally blew up the planet and our whole species lol then idk what will happen, but im not scared and thats the very first strategy in this "war" its the fear that is their greatest weapon against us, if we all stopped being scared at the same time for one hour across the entire planet i don't think "they" could ever regain control. Either way don't worry about my "conspiracy" just know you have a gift with this and you can really help humanity if you perfect this video into a new map and practical system to travel the map! A modern one with modern language that teenagers and older folks all simply understand! I can go on forever so i will go now and before you think it, yes im already writing books on this and doing it myself too! I can't do it alone tho and you are better at this video than i am! Blessings 🙏🙏🙏

[@Speed001]

Tldr?

[@MaxineMadine]

Dear lord. Use spacing, learn to summarize, and condense your writing. Purdue Owl probably has a video on it

[@okthisisepic2928]

The Bible is the best preserved ancient document with Plato and astrotle and many other ancient historical figures works having their earliest surving copies dated to around 1000 ad, with only at most a few dozen manuscripts. The bible has thousands of early copies and the new testaments earliest surving books can be dated to around 200 ad. However there are a huge number of variations in word choice that are different from one another in the manuscripts. This is due to natural translation and scribal error. However we can analyze all these copies to find the words that are in error. The basic truths remain the same even if we went and randomly deleted half of the scriptures in the 4 gospel accounts. If im not mistaken the kjv translates from Greek to english. Why were the disciples willing to suffer and die horribly, not for something they were told, but for something they literally saw. They knew if it was truth or not. A conspiracy to suffer right? If the gospels were fake why didn't the thousands of people that witnessed Jesus spread the memo that the gospels were actually fake? Do you lie, lust or sloth? Even if you are sometimes good you have failed the second commandment love your neighbor as yourself. For example by working hard you could become a doctor and save alot of improvised children from malnutrition if you give most of your money away. But you don't. So what? you say "sometimes I do good even in cases were it's not mutually benificial" and "the bibles definition of good is not what I belive". Indeed you follow your yourself instead of god making yourself your own god. What of the most important commandment? “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind" Instead of following him people reject thier creator who is not an indifferent God, but loves you so much to become a man and die for you and who also wants a relationship with you. If you sin in this life who says you would turn from your sin given more time? Can you pay hells price? Jesus came down, not as a worldly conquerer or king but as a generous teacher, yet he is the most influential man ever. All major religions try to incorporate jesus into thier own, both those that came before and after christ, as some sort of wise teacher or prophet(besides judism obviously) yet christs stance is "no one comes to the father but through me." All major religions preach a salvation where you save yourself yet christianity preaches that a loving God came to save you and he already paid the price for salvation. "Seek and you will find" According to my understanding, God is a God of love, creation and existence and sin is rejection of God, and leads to destruction, nothingness and emptyness. According to the Bible Jesus is coming before the generation of those alive during 1948 passes away. A good source for further research is cold case christianity

[@Speed001]

@@okthisisepic2928 so if he doesn't arrive in 20 years you'll admit you're wrong?

[@Art.Official.Musiqk]

@@MaxineMadine mind your business lol. I'll write however I see fit silly.

[@adonaiblackwood]

I follow sidereal astrology. This video and the “actual magic” video are my favorites ✌️ thanks for your great work, stay well!

[@kxlot79]

This was incredibly well done. Thank you very much for sharing!❤

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@cristin9285]

Please add subtitles to this, it s the best thing i watched and i want to understand it clearly. Thank you for your work!

[@Formscapes]

I'll see if I can make that happen at some point. I still have the script in text format so maybe doing subs won't be too painstaking

[@sandmanenters4187]

Happy to have found this channel, awesome content.

[@Constantinesis]

This is fantastic! I`ve been thinking about how and why primordial archetypes emerge and their relation with the laws of physics. This the only place i`v found this explanation! Thank you for this beautifully crafted video!

[@joshuacollins2392]

Very well made, and articulates the fractals in everything.

[@cityjawn]

So greatfull to find you! Thank you for this work and for sharing with us. 💚💚💚

[@Formscapes]

You're welcome!

[@natanfriedrich89]

Amazing! Great Video! very clear, informative and inspiring! 🙏💜🙂

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@nothing2442]

I can listen to your voice like all day. Thank you so much for your love to Humanity,.🌎🌕🌞✨🌈

[@SGBD8933]

This was great! Peak Content! ! 🙌

[@Formscapes]

Thank you 🙌

[@DavidVega-wi5pr]

Very good video many people throughout time have severely confused this idea

[@PerseyBoi]

What a way to start my day! 👏✨ Infinite thanks for this well-spoken knowledge TROVE! I am truly blessed to just casually come across something like this on here. Amazing. 🔥

[@Formscapes]

Thanks!

[@kevinbrizuela2409]

Your channel a gem! Keep up the good work brother 🖤

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@GhERM2SOIED72]

It's important to point out that many of these patterns come out of our understanding of the world, rather than the world itself. We can point out why Cyan or Pluto are important within a list or continuum, but we are the ones who decide that they are distinct worthy entities. Ultimately, semiotics is useful for teaching humans about themselves, and, as we are one with the universe, we can uncover all knowledge from this-- but we need to include "the thing as itself" as well as "the thing as representation" in order to finally build the world. There is no end to how deep it goes- illusion after illusion after illusion- we can just love where we are and elevate it alongside ourselves.

[@Formscapes]

You are assuming that the structures of valuation which condition our experience of the world issue forth exclusively from the ego rather than being continuous with the valuative structures which condition the unfolding of nature.

[@GhERM2SOIED72]

@@Formscapes I am absolutely saying that the structures of nature are continuous with our will, hence my assertion that all knowledge can and has been gained through the self. I am only establishing the primacy of will since that framework allows for the most autonomy. We willed ourselves into a logically valid world that follows determinable laws of physics with certain constants, we also willed this world to be potent with symbols- but symbols lose power without the things themselves, so its important to recognize them. The moon loses a lot of meaning when it isn't just a white-ish sphere that gets lit differently every night. I would say that knowing more about things in themselves allows for even more potent connections to be made.

[@Formscapes]

@@GhERM2SOIED72 Oh ok, yeah I think I agree with what you're saying.

[@S1rRender]

Yes! The only meaning or definition of anything is simply the one you give it!

[@ChaoticNeutralMatt]

The picture response when you mentioned Being, actually brought me to mind that everything was in essence part of its structure (there's a touch of nuance, but even the frame is relevant, additive, if not core)

[@ChaoticNeutralMatt]

Coming back to this to rewatch. When I try to imagine 'nothing' I typically try to imagine a lack of potentiality. I'm not sure if I actually succeed, but it is different from a void or blackness. It feels.. odd.

[@S1rRender]

That is the fractality of the structure of the universe. It's self reflecting on all scales from infinity and folds inward and outward respectively

[@notloki3377]

my man, we are kindred souls. i've come to many similar conclusions to you. the archetectonics of the cosmos are universal, eternal, fractal, and personal. i'm glad to see someone else is on the right track.

[@Formscapes]

I love the word architectonic. Makes me think of glacial, seismic processes that arbosulte titanic in scale. Very appropriate

[@ThouArtEverywhereAndNowhere]

I remember doing a slideshow presentation in 6th grade It was called “What is Nothing?” Regardless of how you put it, the only thing that can be nothing is ‘no thing,’ even in which case that is still some thing. There is not nothing and yet there is not anything.

[@S1rRender]

Exactly our own minds limit our understanding. Another example is numbness. Numbness is defined as the lack of feeling. But you can still feel when a limb goes numb! The lack of feeling is still a feeling!

[@prometheus010]

No space, dimension, spatial relativity or time

[@toreeschiellerd4680]

copper also blooms (tarnishes) green, that color of fecundity.

[@Formscapes]

Exactly. I also was gonna say something about the state of liberty being venusean, but I ended up editing it out for time

[@caronpotocnik9851]

Fabulous video with wonderful insights thank you

[@Formscapes]

Thanks!

[@MIOLAZARUS]

This was beyond brilliant!

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@BillM-hf4zj]

Wow! This will take more than one viewing. Excellent.

[@babybabybabybaby12]

Well done! I really enjoyed watching the video! In my opinion, you have brought everything together very coherently into one picture.

[@Formscapes]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@jasonmenmuir1980]

A refreshing Outlook on our reality, well done sir! Namaste

[@Formscapes]

Thank you much!

[@-0mon]

Void state! The void of all creation ^0^ Pure consciousness!!!

[@myla6135]

Excellent. Thank you. I just love Abstract Expressionism and it's that "absence of form" and an indeterminacy as you described it that makes those paintings so amazing. Classical Chinese Landscape Painting does something similar..... although depicting landscapes with form of one sort or another but also blank spaces galore allowing for indeterminacy in another way. Those landscapes are not painted standing looking at something and painted it the way Western landscapes are. They are more a collection of memories over time that are then captured on paper (or silk, or whatever). Nor do they use perspective in the way Western painting does. In fact you can go for a walk in the Chinese landscape as depicted and travel to who knows where whilst with the traditional Western landscape you are an onlooker and not a participant. Well, that's how it seems to me.

[@soundmind69]

I believe the idea of fires shining through the stars I was doing dishes the other day Theres a light above where i do dishes I had a bowl filled with water and under the bowl i noticed the shifting and dazzling light changing the appearance from above but projected onto my baking sheet looked just like a star you would observe through a telescope

[@SliversRebuilt]

I like your mind.

[@soundmind69]

@@SliversRebuilt thanks c: I like it too

[@SliversRebuilt]

@soundmind69 haha well at least you love and appreciate yourself! No one else ever possibly could in quite the same way, despite the presumptive delusions of language ; )

[@Kuto152]

You have no idea how useful this video has been for me. It reminds me of carl jungs idea of Aions, if I understand it correctly its the fact that there are these stages of transition so to speak within which humanity as a collective move through which we can observe through the current patterns we elicit in time and space. It's this death and rebirth process, the hero's journey. I've I'm correct I believe the current Aion we are entering or alexy entered is Aquarius..-I dunno exactly how that corresponds to the earth element or material element u described but interesting thought

[@Formscapes]

As I understand it, we are in the process of turning back "upward" towards consciousness of what esotericists call the subtle planes (archetypes and morphic fields and auras and all that). Auquarius is air/water - mist - which we could see as reflecting the astral and etheric realms together. Much to speculate about ofc

[@TheMoopMonster]

Fantastic stuff, no higher intellectual aspiration then to grasp at the infinite mystery. Subscribed.

[@Formscapes]

Welcome aboard, fam!

[@0therun1t21]

Great video! One purpose of this diagram is for you to be able to rearrange it to make sense regarding a natural process, it's not inherently incorrect, and you neing able to rearrange it is one of it's functions. (There's another word I would rather have used instead of "function" but it poofed right when I needed it, apologies). The outer planets get rearranged depending on which body is actually furthest away, sometimes Neptune, sometimes Pluto. I've extrapolated weather patterns from it, it's fun to think about as long as you don't cosider it as absolutely rigid. It's a vastly functional template. I absolutely love the way your brain works, I admire how elastic it is and that you're able to put all of this in one logical video. Thank you!

[@Formscapes]

I just cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would think that they should determine such attributions on account of which planet is further away... I feel like there is a fundamental misunderstanding in Kabbalah about what the diagram actually represents or a fundamental misunderstanding about what the planets actually are, or both. The tree of life diagram is thousands of years old. The Kabbalah tradition is only slightly older than the printing press. I really don't think we should be regarding Kabbalist doctrine as word of God. They were literally just nerds who lived in Madrid during the late middle ages. There is a very real chance that they knew basically nothing about astrology. Esotericists reaaaaaally need to get over this arbitrary dogma that whoever speaks first is automatically right just bc of chronology. That's really just not how the world works. Mystics can be wrong, just like they can be con artists and sexual predators. They are human. They do things for dumb reasons sometimes.

[@0therun1t21]

​​@@FormscapesI think your right, just saying that's what they do, and I know about the nerds you speak of, I was one of them. I didn't mean to get on your nerves, I do admire your mind, so, I apologize if I did. I came here to learn from you but I already made you mad I'll just leave. I don't want to be somewhere I'm not wanted. Thank you for taking the time to reply to me, I wasn't expecting that.

[@Formscapes]

@@0therun1t21 Nah you're fine. No worries. Just voicing my opinion. We're all nerds here

[@0therun1t21]

@@Formscapes Awesome, thank you!

[@seankuszak8447]

I have always been told that amongst other things "GOD" is essentially an ENERGY. So if the "all is, all was, all to ever be sum of EVERYTHING, is "ground" and all "energy" as a rule always takes the most direct path of least resistance to "ground" it sure does in a sence make something that has always seemed to be completely benevolent now seem very tangible.

[@CollectiveHealing8]

I'm a Sag Uranus Rising, exact..(Aquarius Sun/ Mercury) I've felt this BURST OF ENERGY that Uranus harnesses..it's been quite uncomfortable as a Being to Live as..however, I'm finally integrating this Prometheus Archetype into my Misson along with Acceptance into my Personality. But I do Believe this is also my Power. Thank you for your Miraculous Perspective!

[@OmarOHara]

An intriguing exploration of archetypal structures, but it's worth considering that these frameworks may be less about revealing universal truths and more about humanity's psychological need to impose order on chaos. In a universe trending toward maximum entropy, these archetypes could be seen as our cognitive tools for creating local pockets of 'meaning' in an otherwise indifferent cosmos. While the video offers various lenses to make sense of the world, it also inadvertently highlights our collective struggle to accept the unsettling notion of a meaningless universe.

[@Formscapes]

I vehemently disagree with this interpretation in every single way. What exactly would distinguish a "meaningful" from a "meaningless" universe? The very idea off a meaningless universe must already admit that the phenomenal realm which we actually encounter empirically is necessarily inundated with signification. The idea of "meaninglessness" then necessarily presumes a world which lies beyond the world of phenomena; i.e., a world which we by definition can never actually encounter. A world which is theorized to exist beyond the one we actually experience as real. The evocation of "entropy" is also a cheap trick which has become far too normalized by a deeply dogmatic academic community; as though the same logic invented to make sense of steam engines can be extrapolated to the destiny of the cosmos. Think about the fact that the "refutation" of Maxwell's demon relies on the presumption that nature has no inherent memory. Think really hard about what that actually means.

[@OmarOHara]

Thank you for your detailed response. While I appreciate the intellectual rigor behind your arguments, I believe there's a crucial distinction to be made between speculative metaphysical frameworks and empirically grounded scientific principles. The archetypal structures you present are undoubtedly fascinating, but they risk being perceived as universally applicable truths rather than as human-constructed lenses for making sense of complexity. Regarding the concept of 'entropy,' I agree that it's a term rooted in thermodynamics and not directly applicable to existential or metaphysical questions. However, its invocation serves as a metaphorical counterpoint to highlight the speculative nature of the archetypes discussed. It's a reminder that while these archetypes may offer profound insights into human experience, they are not on the same epistemological footing as principles that have undergone rigorous scientific testing. Your point about nature's 'lack of memory' and its implications for Maxwell's demon is thought-provoking. But it also underscores the need for caution when extrapolating metaphysical conclusions from speculative reasoning. Theories about realms beyond empirical experience may be intellectually stimulating, but they remain unverifiable and thus should be distinguished from demonstrable scientific facts.

[@Formscapes]

@@OmarOHara I'm not speculating about metaphysical realms beyond human experience. I believe that reality is fundamentally experiential, as per Whitehead, Bergson, Hegel, Goethe, etc The idea of a "meaningless" world can only apply to a world which is somehow "behind" or "beyond" our experience. That is a world which by definition cannot be empirically observed. We can only infer its existence in a purely abstract manner and then speculate that it might be "meaningless" or devoid of "consciousness". The argument you are making is fundamentally Kantian, and the argument I am making is that the Kantian bifurcation of phenomena and noumena necessarily negates itself - as we see illustrated in The Phenomenology of Spirit. You also seem to be misunderstanding my point about entropy. I am not saying that entropy applies to a physical world which must be distinguished from a metaphysical world; I am saying that there is one world, and the "laws" of entropy simply do not apply to it, bc reality is not a giant steam engine. It is an organism, and the 19th century metaphor of the mechanical universe has been completely outmoded by science itself, to say nothing of metaphysics.

[@Formscapes]

@@OmarOHara the "laws" of thermodynamics were developed in order to mathematically model engines, in an age of engines. The age of engines is over, and we are making a mistake when we attempt to carry forward such questionable metaphors into the realms of biology and cosmology.

[@ChaoticNeutralMatt]

I suppose I would only point out that this itself (the original post) is itself a perspective. That's one thing we also don't really move beyond. Anyway. 'Empirical experience'. That's a curious thing I'm going to consider for a little bit.

[@chartingwithliv]

Amazing breakdown of the eclectic knowledge we know currently :)

[@Formscapes]

Thank you!

[@NinlilsLittleEnby]

Your take away that understanding archetypes is important because everything that exists exists within said archetypes is truly a message that needs to be heard and spread

[@Formscapes]

Hopefully it wil!

[@cerveraux]

I can tell by the structure of your thought process that you are deeply aware of RS ideas. What a "pleasure" to listen something that it's rooted beyond the duality of earth (crow) though.

[@Formscapes]

We are definitely gonna be doing alot of Anthroposophy on this channel moving forward

[@cerveraux]

It's interesting where you place the second guardian. In my understanding the second guardian is not beyond this and the pure spiritual plane, it's beetwen the spiritual and beyond, the meta of the meta, the "pelican" is the first Guardian and the "Phoenix" is the second. Since you are starting with colors... have you ever tried the thought path of the colors of the first class mantras? It's really interest to put side to side RS notion of color with Goethe.@@Formscapes

[@AwareLife]

What a great work! Thank you! Subscribed. 🙏🙏🙏

[@Formscapes]

Thanks fam!

[@fatboyoficiale]

This is my favorite album. I will be periodically relistening to this until I am 100 at least

[@thewolfmanhulk2927]

Thank you for making these, introducing people to people like jung and such, and wanting to learn and read is the key of humanity. Thank you for these

[@Formscapes]

Thanks for watching!

[@ywtcc]

I thought of this idea, it's an abstraction of a timing array. The idea is there's some finite number of poles, and each one of these poles produces timing pulses in response to absorbing energy. Using these timing pulses as asynchronous data streams, the information is integrated to create a map of reality of complexity proportional to the number of poles used as sensors. The thing about this timing array device, is it's really useful for orienting yourself. My hypothesis is that EVERY sensory device is some variation of this form. That's pulsar timing arrays, photoelectronics, optical nerves, and EVEN FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES must have this internal structure in order to interact with spacetime. A particle with poles in two fields will only have structure in those two fields. It's not just sensory when it's on the level of particles, it also explains the projected spacetime they inhabit. So, that's a kind of automaton definition of spacetime, whereby spacetime is defined in terms of the device that senses it. Something like a cross between Turing and Platonic solids. Note: causal set theory is exactly the solution to the ordering problem of asynchronous timing pulses. Also, there's uncertainty principles all over the place in this one, and there's an underlying ordering uncertainty principle that's being illuminated by the device. Not all the ordering problems are solvable, nor should they be.

[@OtisSchmakel]

Think U R ON to something here... "spacetime is defined in terms of the device that senses it." I am sensing it. You are sensing it. We are sensing it. THEY are sensing it.....

[@S1rRender]

Now think about if Space defines matter rather than the other way around. We mistakenly believe that the objects taking up space are defining factor but I think that is incorrect and it's really weird that everyone just assumes and I haven't found anyone who thinks different